Israel Self Delusion about Condoleezza Rice and Muslim Future

Israel’s future under the Rice plan is as a unified and unitary Muslim dictatorship. This is the only future that is possible under her program. Israel is in almost total self-delusion on this.

Following is mind numbing denial of reality staring Israel in the face. Rice thinks of Israel as an apartheid regime of European colonists that must be removed by force and a dictatorship of the Muslim proletariat freedom fighters in the brown black alliance established.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=961229

The causal line between Rice’s formative years and experiences and her subsequent policy preferences is largely one of speculation.

Really? When has desegregation or de-apartheid ever meant anything different then ethnic cleansing of whites? Anywhere? Anytime?

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/939202.html

search Bush Knesset Condoleezza Rice segregation Palestinians

…From First Haaretz link:

Until further notice, the Israeli-Palestinian peace process is the centerpiece of Rice’s agenda for her final year in office.

Bumiller’s and Kessler’s books are very different, but they do share a few common anecdotes and conclusions. One of them is that getting the green light to move on Israeli-Palestinian peace was central to Rice’s agreeing to take up the appointment at State during the Bush second term, and pursuing that goal has now become, to quote Bumiller, “a race with time.”

This means Target Israel is the Rice Project for 2008. Rice operates on hate. She wants to finish Israel off because she hates Jews for being part of slavery and just existing.

Rice has two arrows to get the European colonists. One is Iranian nukes. The other is Palestinian and Arab demography. She knows that is the better weapon in the long run for total extinction. That is why she wants Turkey in Europe.

Rice is the one who has protected Iran’s and Pakistan’s nuclear program. Rice is the one who wants to see Europeans fried under a Muslim Mushroom Cloud. That’s her idea of a picnic.

==

Rice knows she will need Muslims to root out the last white person on earth.  Iranian or Pakistani nukes, which she has protected, can only go so far to achiever her ends.  That is why she wants Turkey in Europe.  That is why she wants the Arabs in Israel.

==

We are considering here hypotheses.  One is that Rice is the same as Kissinger or anyone else.  The other is she is different.  PC says she is the same, uses the same methods, and pursues the same ends.

==

Who understood the races better?  The whites in the old South or the whites of today?  The whites of the old South are being shown by science and experience to have been right on everything.  That they were right on segregation can be tested with Rice’s own actions from before 9/11 to now. Rice has been a pivotal figure in Bush ordering no profiling of Arabs and Muslims before 9/11. That is likely why he didn’t respond to the warnings of 9/11, because he was already on record from Rice that it would be racist to do so.  That is why Pakistan and Saudi Arabia got away with 9/11, because it would be racist of a white like Bush to call them out on it.  That is why the Iranians can build a nuclear bomb.  That is why the Arabs have control of Gaza now.  That is why Bush pushes for Turkey in Europe. That is why Bush said Islam was a religion of peace.  All of these test who was right about the races, the whites of the old South or new South whites like Bush.

==

The above is hypotheses, opinion or speculation.  Hypotheses may be stated starkly to assist in testing them against PC hypotheses.  All statements should be restated as questions or hypotheses.  All other disclaimers apply.

Arne Naevra White Polar Bear bitterly clings to ice, God and guns

Arne NaevraShell Wildlife Photographer of the Year

http://rawstory.com/images/new/bear.jpg

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2069092.ece

http://images.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=Arne+Naevra&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

http://weehaggis.wordpress.com/2007/10/

White Ku Klux Klan Nazi Storm-trooper BNP Hitler David Duke loving polar bear clings to its last bit of segregation and apartheid instead of joining the sea of color around it. What a racist bear. This bear is a white nationalist bear that won’t accept the end of segregation. We have seen its like before.

As Barack Hussein Obama has said, bring down this white supremacist bear. Bring it down now. As Condoleezza Rice has said, we are everywhere to fight these bears. Whether its Zimbabwe or South Africa or Israel or Birmingham, Alabama or Loudoun County or Lewiston, Maine or West Virginia, the brown black Islam alliance is there to end this white apartheid regime. We shall overcome.

==

This white clinging to ice shows how whites are ice people not sun people. This white clings to cold ice instead of welcoming immigrants and people of color. This white knows its days are numbered and its white cold heart will be buried forever beneath the sea, mourned by no one except other cold hearted ice white people on their way out as well. This is what white racist denial of truth has got them.  Whites hate the truth and they shall suffer for it and go extinct for it. Inshallah.

Bush drinks Condoleezza Rice Kool-aid on Israel and Islam

Diana West has a column on Bush’s comment to the Knesset that Israel in the last 60 years is Islam in the next 60 years. Actually, its the opposite. Islam will erase what Israel has accomplished in the last 60 years, if it can. Islam for the last 600 years has been the same force for change, of what is good in the West for what is bad. Islam has been the driving force behind slavery for the last 1000 years.

Where does Bush get his ideas on Islam and Israel? From Condoleezza Rice who just sees in Israel Apartheid and Segregation of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. The reason they have to be kept apart is they are criminals who would kill Jews in a second if given the chance, and have shown it over and over.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/did-condoleezza-rice-racism-lead-bush-to-surrender-to-islam/

Some of the hypotheses at the above link can be restated for Islam or Arabs or Turks for the purpose of testing against PC hypotheses of sameness or of the same frequency distribution applying to different groups. The history of the Arab Muslim expansion dated from 622 A.D. or year 1 in their calendar can be used to test the PC hypotheses v. the non-PC hypotheses.

Diana West on Bush before Knesset:

http://www.townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=19e60d3b-eae4-48f5-afdd-a7735417dffc&t=c

This must be an enduring puzzle to Bush, for just as he seems blind to the singular qualities of Judaism that root Israel within the Western tradition, he seems blind to the equally singular (but not overlapping) qualities of Islam that leave it outside. Distinguishing between the two traditions is the height of political incorrectness, let alone shattering to the multicultural vision of the Middle East that the Bush administration has made the basis of its democratization policy.

Where does this come from? We consider the following hypothesis. This can be contrasted to the idea that Rice’s views are the same as whites, or the same as the whites at Stanford, two distinct hypotheses to be sure.

Hypo: The Bush Knesset speech comes from Rice who is anti-Western to the core. Rice is anti-white. Rice identifies with Islam and the Arabs because they are anti-white, anti-Jewish and anti-Western. That is Rice’s self-identity, the fight against whites and everything white. The hatred Rice has for whites and their civilization is in fact the same as the hatred that Muslims have for both. In each case, their hatred of Jews is just a more intense form of their broader hatred of whites.

Lawrence Auster

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010622.html

Does Condoleezza Rice secretly believe that Zionism is racism? She seems to think Zionism is apartheid and segregation and the Klan. Doesn’t she equate all those with racism?

Search: Condoleezza Rice Israel segregation

Results 1 - 100 of about 86,000 for Condoleezza Rice Israel segregation.

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/brenner301207.html

==

Ehud Olmert suddenly announced after Annapolis that “if the day comes when the two-state solution collapses, and we face a South African-style struggle for equal voting rights, then, as soon as that happens, the State of Israel is finished” (“Olmert Warns of ‘End of Israel’,” BBC, 11/29/07)

Is that what happened to the US from the 1964 Civil Rights Act and from integration and from immigration and affirmative action? Aren’t those the end of America as we knew it?

==

In private conversations — and as she said in Annapolis — Rice tends to compare the Israeli occupation in the territories to the racial segregation that used to be the norm in the American South. The Israel Defense Forces checkpoints where Palestinians are detained remind her of the buses she rode as a child in Alabama, which had separate seats for blacks and whites. This is an uncomfortable comparison, of course, for the Israelis, who view it as “over-identification” on her part with Palestinian suffering. (Aluf Benn, “What’s the Hurry?” 12/27/07)

Removal of these protections has had the same result in Zimbabwe, South Africa, and America. Israel is next on their program. It too would then disappear as we have known it. At what point do we wake up? There will always be those willing to destroy us and telling us we are bigots not to let them. But that doesn’t mean we have to let them or help them.

The fight to preserve our civilization, which depends on our genes, is not evil but good. Its those who destroy both and lie about their intentions who are evil. We have seen them over and over again in the 20th century and in centuries past. Islam is a perfect example of their thinking and this is why those who seek to destroy us today make alliance with Islam, they know its implacable hate and its willingness to lie about its intentions and its practices when it wins.

==

The Arne Naevra photo of a polar bear forlornly clinging to bit of ice is a symbol of whites everywhere, if we continue to agree that stopping our extinction is bigotry, by us.

http://rawstory.com/images/new/bear.jpg

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2069092.ece

http://images.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=Arne+Naevra&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

http://weehaggis.wordpress.com/2007/10/

We see a white polar bear in trouble clinging to his last bit of ice. What does Condoleezza Rice see? She sees the white Klan bear engaging in apartheid and not allowing Palestinians and blacks onto his or her last bit of white ice.  Until the white bear goes down, its an angry white clinging to segregation, guns and God in desperation out of its changing circumstances.  Obama sees it clinging to bitterness towards those who look different and immigrants.

The above is hypotheses, opinion or speculation. All statements in the positive should be restated as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Should US toss countries without freedom out of G8?

They could use the army’s slogan, a G8 of 1. G1. If you use Roman numerals, its GI.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorius_Nekschot

Some vulgar images and according to Dutch police, some unPC

http://www.gregoriusnekschot.nl/blog/

Search Dutch cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3257

What about tossing out all the G8 that practice genocide against whites? Then its the G0? Or maybe the GI with Russia as the only member?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24665094/

http://danishaffairs.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/henrik-nordbrandt-a-danish-poet-who-dares/

Islam is the religion of liberals who hate the West.

search Islamsterdam

If Dems have it all in 2009 they will do nothing

If the Democrats don’t have a Republican president to blame in 2009, then they will do next to nothing.  They will restore the higher tax rate on the wealthy of the 1990’s.  They will talk to Iran.  They will do little else.  McCain gives them cover to do harm to us.  Bipartisanship is a conspiracy of the two parties against the people.

When the people are divided and the parties united its called tyranny.  The elites are then free to do what they want to the rest.  Their choice of weapons are immigration, affirmative action, integration for middle class whites, and low cost imports.  Those are their policies of jobcide, whitecide, and wages-cide.  If McCain is president that is what we get.  Vote Chuck Baldwin and the Constitution Party to avoid being complicit with it.

Did Condoleezza Rice racism lead Bush to surrender to Islam?

==

We must first give praise to PC.

All statements are hypotheses. All comparisons among groups are about frequency distributions. Hypotheses may be stated sharply for the purpose of falsification and model building. Individuals can vary and no individual can be judged by their group. Individuals also vary over time and circumstance. All groups contain subgroups that differ. Some hypotheses are stated starkly to contrast with PC for developing comparative tests.

==We restate the fundamental hypothesis of PC for convenience of readers.

All people are the same. They treat each other the same.

In what follows we consider alternatives to this fundamental truth, not because we doubt it, but by disproving the error of other ideas we give greater glory to our sameness and prove our tameness.

A watered down version is:

All people are independently identical drawings from the same frequency distribution and no person treats another differently because of any characteristic nor attributes any differences to group characteristics.

At times in what follows, unPC hypotheses are considered. These are stated so that by disproving them we give renewed confidence in PC from which all our freedom and security comes. Disclaimers are repeated so that the feeble minded, such as heads of government departments, will not think they are true because they are written.

==

The Bush presidency has been a long cover-up and denial of the evil and bigotry of Islam, Arabs, Pakistanis and others hostile to the West. In almost every case, the Bush administration has put out the most extreme anti-Western line. This has been fed by Condoleezza Rice to Bush from before Bush became president. Rice instructed Bush in liberal anti-Westernism.

Bush promised to stop profiling Muslims and Arabs in the 2000 election race. Did Rice tell him to? This was to her the same thing as growing up in “segregated Birmingham”?

search Condoleezza Rice “segregated Birmingham”

Results 1 - 100 of about 1,690 for Condoleezza Rice “segregated Birmingham“.

search Condoleezza Rice segregation Israel

Results 1 - 100 of about 85,800 for Condoleezza Rice segregation Israel.

Colin Powell was a passive abettor of Rice’s active anti-white racism?

search Colin Powell segregation

http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/pow0int-1

Plessy vs. Fergusson, in 1896, sanctioned separation on the basis of color. As long as you treat the races equally, then you can separate them. But the whole reason to separate them was to treat them unequally. It essentially validated Jim Crow segregation, disenfranchisement of an entire group of people who were black, giving them no economic opportunity. “Don’t educate them. Continue to treat them as tenth class citizens.” And it rested on the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which was founded on the Constitution. And that continued up to my lifetime.

..

So in 1963 when I came home from Vietnam, having served my nation, having sworn an oath to the Constitution to serve my nation, I came home and was denied access to restaurants and refused service in hotels and motels.

So in 2001, when Saudi Arabia and Pakistan attacked the United States through a proxy they funded and supported where was Powell? With Rice telling Bush whites were racist. We can infer the advice they gave from Bush’s “Religion of Peace Speech”. They weren’t holding Islam or Saudi Arabia or Pakistan accountable, but blaming white America.

For Powell and Rice, this was the chickens of racism coming home to roost. America was getting the same treatment it had dished out to others. The idea of fighting back against the Saudis or Arabs or Islam made no sense to them because it was their unquestioned belief that there was a world wide brown black alliance against whites, i.e. against racism.

That was their entire self-identity, the world wide war against racism, i.e. against whites. 9/11 was part of their side attacking whites. They identified both the Pentagon and the World Trade Center with the white establishment. Even though they seemingly were part of it, they never identified themselves as part of it.

This is also why Barack Hussein Obama can’t register the anti-black racism of Arabs or Muslims including in Indonesia where he grew up. He simply has transferred everything done to him by Muslims or Asians to whites. This is the same with Rice and Powell. They equate whites with the cause of all evil.

Rice is a committed anti-European? She wants genocide of whites and of European civilization, which she hates and wants everlasting revenge against for slavery and superiority? She was never Stanford material (nor was Powell) and she knew it. She was an affirmative action provost of Stanford. She was there to be a face for Stanford.

Rice’s mission has been to make George W. Bush anti-white and anti-Western, anti-Europe, and anti-American. She succeeded. Bush is all those things. So was his entire administration from start to finish, with some exceptions. Bush surrendered to Islam and welcomed in Islam and Muslims because of Rice’s hate of whites.

==

All statements are hypotheses. All comparisons among groups are about frequency distributions. Hypotheses may be stated sharply for the purpose of falsification and model building. Individuals can vary and no individual can be judged by their group. Individuals also vary over time and circumstance. All groups contain subgroups that differ. Some hypotheses are stated starkly to contrast with PC for developing comparative tests.

==

The Powell Rice 8 years from 2001 to 2009 are a period of black nationalist policies. On immigration and Islam those were deadly to the whites and their civilization everywhere in the world. That was the intention.

The hostility and hatred of black nationalism is a powerful force in American and white history. It has been ignored out of white arrogance and for other reasons. Its a constant attempt to drag white America and whites in general down. We should face this, because eventually it will succeed if it hasn’t given us a mortal blow already. Black nationalism has targeted whites for extinction world wide. We should wake up and realize we fight such a foe. Islam has the same intent.

Whites who play matches with these gasoline containers for fun or anticipated profits are fools. These are not just inert combustibles to change metaphors. Black nationalism is a powerful force that can’t be bargained with or negotiated with. Its not just like a terminator, it is a terminator. It will terminate whites and their civilizations unless stopped. This seems to be a lesson that each generation has to learn over again. Time is running out because its been given control of the levers of power for the last 8 years and its taken its shot with the instinct for what kills.

==

All statements are hypotheses. All comparisons among groups are about frequency distributions. Hypotheses may be stated sharply for the purpose of falsification and model building. Individuals can vary and no individual can be judged by their group. Individuals also vary over time and circumstance. All groups contain subgroups that differ. Some hypotheses are stated starkly to contrast with PC for developing comparative tests.

==

Affirmative action blacks don’t identify with white institutions or whites or white America. That is what Rice, Powell, Michelle Obama, and Barack Obama have shown to us over and over. They hate us and don’t identify with what they were given, but keep on coming to get those who gave it to them. Appeasement by affirmative action not only doesn’t satisfy the crocodile of black hate of whites, the real original sin in America, but simply brings it on.

Black hatred of whites is not something that can be bargained with, channeled or negotiated with. its not caused by slavery or anything whites do. It has existed from the beginning. Slavery was a response to it, not the cause of it. Whites discovered black hatred and used slavery as the only way to deal with blacks. Blacks had already made that discovery themselves millenia ago. Their hate is within them and part of them. It applies to other blacks as much as to whites.

Seemingly civilized blacks like Rice or Powell or Michelle Obama or Barack Obama or Reverend Jeremiah Wright show it sooner or later. This is part of who they are. Its not a reaction to slavery or white racism. Slavery was a black reaction to their own nature and own inability to trust other blacks. This made blacks unfit for market institutions which depend on trust encoded in DNA. Blacks don’t have that like whites do, so they can’t function in a market economy with its institutions as whites do. Whites have to learn the same lesson over and over again each generation. They think their ancestors were racists who made this up. Its fundamental truth is shown how black societies recognize it and demonstrate it as well white ones.

Trust is something in the DNA. So it trustworthiness. Unfortunately, whites have both and blacks don’t in the same way whites do. This is a chemical difference. Its not a reaction to slavery. Reparations only intensifies it. But in the end, it can’t be educated away, negotiated away, affirmative actioned away or otherwise bargained with or reasoned with.

==

All statements are hypotheses. All comparisons among groups are about frequency distributions. Hypotheses may be stated sharply for the purpose of falsification and model building. Individuals can vary and no individual can be judged by their group. Individuals also vary over time and circumstance. All groups contain subgroups that differ. Some hypotheses are stated starkly to contrast with PC for developing comparative tests.

==

Nothing shows this more than the games of, Its racism, or That’s racist, or He is racist. Those games are not about bargaining fairly for an exchange based on trust and mutuality. Those are hostile games. But they are the games that all interchanges with blacks take. These are the same as muggings. Educated blacks have learned to use these as a more successful tactic to mug and intimidate whites. All relations to blacks revolve around these games. This shows there is no real trust or mutuality as whites understand it and live it.

Relations with blacks are reduced to the black level of intimidation, violence, threat and taking. This is why blacks enslaved each other millenia before whites came into contact with them. This is because this is how blacks relate on a DNA level. Its not a reaction to slavery. Its coded into blacks in their DNA. Whites who try to placate them simply are handing over their wallets and often their lives and always their security and ability to feel safe and natural. It isn’t possible for whites to feel safe around blacks, anymore than blacks can. This is because of black DNA.

==

All statements are hypotheses. All comparisons among groups are about frequency distributions. Hypotheses may be stated sharply for the purpose of falsification and model building. Individuals can vary and no individual can be judged by their group. Individuals also vary over time and circumstance. All groups contain subgroups that differ. Some hypotheses are stated starkly to contrast with PC for developing comparative tests.

==

The above is draft and preliminary. These are hypotheses or opinion. All positive statements should be restated as questions.

Tar Baby and the Inner Racism of the Left

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/16/rep-tom-davis-uses-term-tar-baby-in-gop-memo/

Logan Murphy on Friday, May 16th, 2008 at 6:20 PM - PDT

The Politico:In a 20-page memo on GOP electoral woes, Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) repeatedly misspells Barack Obama’s name – it’s one R, congressman, not two — and then manages to use the racially charged term “tar baby” in a paragraph about Obama and immigration.

“Remember,” Davis writes, “Hispanic voters are a swing group in this election and future elections. John McCain, being from a border state, may be out of sync with many Republicans but he has standing among Hispanics. Barrack Obama has not made the sale to Hispanic voters. Thus, this issue is a tar baby for anyone who touches it, with land mines everywhere.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_baby

Tar-Baby was a doll made of tar and turpentine, used to entrap Br’er Rabbit in the second of the Uncle Remus stories. The more that Br’er Rabbit fought the Tar-Baby, the more entangled he became. In contemporary usage, a tar baby refers to any “sticky situation” that is only aggravated by efforts to solve it.^[1]

Although the term’s provenance arose in African folklore, some now consider “tar baby” to have negative connotations revolving around pejorative images of African-Americans.^[2] Specific reasons why the term developed negative racial aspects are difficult to identify. In recent years, several politicians who have publicly used the term have encountered some controversy, mocking, and censure from African-American civil rights leaders, members of the popular daily media, and other politicians.^{[3][4][5][6][7][8]}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Remus

Comment 100 posted at their thread by OA

Isn’t the real racism here the racism on the left?  They take a phrase like “tar baby” and try to turn it into some twisted racist meaning because they themselves have negative views of blacks.  Anything bad that somehow is Africa or black in some way they turn into racist.  Its their own inability to admit what they think about race that is the root of their silliness.  Its obvious for everyone to see.

The term that sticks here is “tar baby”.  Any discussion of race turns into a tar baby for the left as they reveal their own inner feelings which they twist and try to avoid admitting. If they said what they thought instead of condemning it in others they wouldn’t get into these tar baby situations.

Bush is appeaser of Iran by not having a draft

Appeasement at its core is not having a big enough military to stop an aggressor before they get started.  This is carry a big stick deterrence.   This is Teddy Roosevelt deterrence.    How do you spell deterrence to an Ayatollah, T.R.   “Perdicaris Alive or Raisuli Dead”

George W. Bush spells it, Islam is the Religion of Peace.  George Fatuous Bush. Bush the Betrayer.  Bush the idiot. Bush the surrenderer to Islam.  Bush the 15,000 Saudi students immigrationist.  We never needed Bush.  Bush was betraying us to Islam in the 2000 election.  Voting Bush was never a good idea.  It was revulsion at Clinton, but that is a separate matter.

We need to draft 2 million men, lay down conditions, appoint commissioners, and give Iran 6 months, which we need anyhow to draft and train our army.  Then we do a ground invasion, remove the regime, institute Christianity as the state religion, remove all their weapons above broom sticks and surround and blockade Pakistan to give up its nukes and bin Laden.

Neither Iran nor Pakistan respects us until we have a ground supply line we control to our troops in Afghanistan.  Until we have that, they think our troops in Afghanistan are their hostages.  You can’t negotiate with the perception you are a hostage.  You have to change it with facts and acts.  Draft 2 million men, give Iran 6 months and conditions and we have facts and acts.

Bush is the appeaser of North Korea, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.  Bush betrayed us after 9/11.  Bush said Islam is the Religion of Peace.  Bush invented 21st century appeasement.  Bush ordered no profiling of Muslims before 9/11 as a campaign promise, see Steve Sailer on and before 9/11/2001.

Its too bad the 9/11 Commission didn’t hire Steve Sailer to write its report instead of Bush appeaser and weasel Philip Zelikow.  Zelikow rhymes with Quisling, almost and means about the same, let the Muslims in your country and take money from Saudi Arabia or Bill Gates or something in-between.

We need a vote, draft, negotiate, vote plan.  Congress must vote a draft of 2 million men, conditions on Iran, and commissioners.  Then they talk.  After 6 months, Congress votes to invade.  Rinse and repeat with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.  That’s a plan.  Bush’s entire life has been appeasement from the time he was AWOL with the Air National Guard, making his draft evasion dishonorable and criminal.

Obama Sweetie violates leftism while G d America is ok

Barack Hussein Obama profaned the liberal gods by calling a reporter sweetie. Reverend Wright can God Damn America and the Weather Undergrounders Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn bomb the Pentagon and the Capitol, but calling a reporter sweetie is real profanity under liberalism. Obama could have multiple Black Nationalist eruptions and it would not count as much as one more Sweetie Eruption.

Bush dishonors American soldiers by letting in Muslims

The military derives its meaning from protecting the country.  When Muslims attack the United States, the military derives meaning by keeping them out.  When Bush lets them in anyhow, the military have no meaning in their service.  What protection is it when people attack and are let in and given a seat at the table and its bigotry to say otherwise?

After 9/11, Muslims, Arabs and Pakistanis should have been sent packing not given foot baths at airports while Gore and Italian lawyers are led away in shackles.  Bush inverts reality for his humor.  That Bush could do this and get away with it shows his superiority to us.  But it shows we have contempt for ourselves to let him get away with it.

At Walter Reed they have a transitioning warriors program.  What program is it to come back to a society that promotes what they fought?  Its a disorientation program.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,147027,00.html

In World War II, soldiers were fighting for home and kith and kin. The British were our cousins, at least then they were.  We were not fighting for immigration by our foes to our land.  Now we do, and our wars are meaningless.  Bush dishonored everyone who died in 9/11 and everyone who fought since by his Religion of Peace speech. So does the Red Crescent Memorial.