Leon Panetta criticism of Obama is because Russia has kompromat on Obama?

October 10, 2014

Is the reason that Leon Panetta is out criticizing President Obama while still in office because Russia has kompromat on Obama?  This arises from the Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer appointments?  Obama has become an accessory to the plot and this is complicated by his being a former paid employee of University of Chicago, a co-conspirator with Russia against the United States?

University of Chicago was involved in numerous incidents in economics and physics including atomic espionage aided by plagiarism kompromat starting in World War II and the possible Markowitz Roy Cowles Commission incident in 1952, Oehme and Edge of the Wedge, Stanley Fischer plagiarism and more reason incidents.

Panetta’s actions are very unusual.  This is covered on TV and Kelly File where questions are raised about Panetta’s loyalty to make this criticism of Obama as weak.  Is the weakenss from kompromat on Obama?

Leon Panetta was head of the CIA and DoD. So he would know about some of the plagiarism kompromat discussed here.  Panetta was at the Stanford SIEPR Day where Stanley Fischer was given an award and 100,000 by Stanford while Stanford was acting as a co-conspirator with Russia to cover up and to engage in further acts.  These include those involving Darrell Duffie and further iterations of the plagiarism starting possibly with Markowitz, then Stanley Fischer and Paul Samuelson and then of portfolio theory dynamic optimization with stochastic interest rates.  Markowitz Roy was one period optimization, Hakansson was multiple period and then the case of stochastic environments leading to dynamic portfolio rules was a third iteration in this series of plagiarism of the portfolio optimization.

Russia used this to get the Nobel Prize nominations for Kantorovich in 1975 from Samuelson and Arrow.  Then to get IMF loans in the 1990s. Now to influence Duffie and Moody’s to lower Ukraine’s credit rating ahead of S and P and do less to lower Russia’s credit rating.  They also have kompromat over Obama over the Stanley Fischer appointment. That is linked to the murder of Berezovsky if that is the case.  Obama has potentially become an accessory to criminal acts. Eric Holder as well may be. That may be the reason he has to resign.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Kennedy Khrushchev removed from power Who Whom

October 10, 2014

Kennedy Khrushchev brought the world to the brink in 1962.  In 1963, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas.

Kennedy ignited the world’s youth in a crusade against Communism world-wide.  Kennedy’s inaugural and his speech in Berlin presented the Soviet Union with a mortal threat.  Kennedy was a messiah of antiCommunism. He fused his appeal as a Catholic, an antiCommunist, a capitalist, and a sex symbol to ignite the youth of the world to revolt against Communism. the old men of the Kremlin were now presented with a fusion of religion, ideology, charisma and sex appeal that could topple them in an instant.

The leaders of the Soviet Union never felt safe. They never felt it was stable.  They were paranoid the whole time. It was a nation of paranoia.  They knew they had enemies.  As the 1950s ended, China turned against them too.

See Khrushchev link below for following quote.

The Soviets had planned to provide China with an atomic bomb complete with full documentation, but in 1959, amid cooler relations, the Soviets destroyed the device and papers instead.[243] When Khrushchev paid a visit to China in September, shortly after his successful U.S. visit, he met a chilly reception, and Khrushchev left the country on the third day of a planned seven-day visit.[244] Relations continued to deteriorate in 1960, as both the USSR and China used a Romanian Communist Party congress as an opportunity to attack the other. After Khrushchev attacked China in his speech to the congress, Chinese leader Peng Zhen mocked Khrushchev, stating that the premier’s foreign policy was to blow hot and cold towards the West. Khrushchev responded by pulling Soviet experts out of China.[245]

Kennedy Speech Berlin June 1963

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZItzF0ldAUo

Kennedy was an existential threat to Russia.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/oEX2uqSQGEGIdTYgd_JL_Q.aspx

I am proud to come to this city as the guest of your distinguished Mayor, who has symbolized throughout the world the fighting spirit of West Berlin. And I am proud to visit the Federal Republic with your distinguished Chancellor who for so many years has committed Germany to democracy and freedom and progress, and to come here in the company of my fellow American, General Clay, who has been in this city during its great moments of crisis and will come again if ever needed.

Two thousand years ago the proudest boast was “civis Romanus sum.” Today, in the world of freedom, the proudest boast is “Ich bin ein Berliner.”

I appreciate my interpreter translating my German!

There are many people in the world who really don’t understand, or say they don’t, what is the great issue between the free world and the Communist world. Let them come to Berlin. There are some who say that communism is the wave of the future. Let them come to Berlin. And there are some who say in Europe and elsewhere we can work with the Communists. Let them come to Berlin. And there are even a few who say that it is true that communism is an evil system, but it permits us to make economic progress. Lass’ sie nach Berlin kommen. Let them come to Berlin.

Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect, but we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in, to prevent them from leaving us. I want to say, on behalf of my countrymen, who live many miles away on the other side of the Atlantic, who are far distant from you, that they take the greatest pride that they have been able to share with you, even from a distance, the story of the last 18 years. I know of no town, no city, that has been besieged for 18 years that still lives with the vitality and the force, and the hope and the determination of the city of West Berlin. While the wall is the most obvious and vivid demonstration of the failures of the Communist system, for all the world to see, we take no satisfaction in it, for it is, as your Mayor has said, an offense not only against history but an offense against humanity, separating families, dividing husbands and wives and brothers and sisters, and dividing a people who wish to be joined together.

What is true of this city is true of Germany–real, lasting peace in Europe can never be assured as long as one German out of four is denied the elementary right of free men, and that is to make a free choice. In 18 years of peace and good faith, this generation of Germans has earned the right to be free, including the right to unite their families and their nation in lasting peace, with good will to all people. You live in a defended island of freedom, but your life is part of the main. So let me ask you as I close, to lift your eyes beyond the dangers of today, to the hopes of tomorrow, beyond the freedom merely of this city of Berlin, or your country of Germany, to the advance of freedom everywhere, beyond the wall to the day of peace with justice, beyond yourselves and ourselves to all mankind.

Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free. When all are free, then we can look forward to that day when this city will be joined as one and this country and this great Continent of Europe in a peaceful and hopeful globe. When that day finally comes, as it will, the people of West Berlin can take sober satisfaction in the fact that they were in the front lines for almost two decades.

All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin, and, therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words “Ich bin ein Berliner.”

http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/Historic-Speeches.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy#Assassination

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy

Russia’s hands were all over it, but the US blinked and ignored it.  Oswald came back from Russia. Oswald went to the Soviet embassy in Mexico before the assassination.

He also attended Cuban related events in Mexico City.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2013/11/philip_shenon_s_a_cruel_and_shocking_act_stunning_reporting_in_new_book.html

Kennedy was a mortal threat to Cuba and Casto but also to the Soviet Union and the Kremlin’s leaders. Kennedy was bold, inspiring and ruthless to defeat Communism.  The overthrow of Castro could help put the Communists on the defensive and lead to a military coup in Russia.

The Soviet Union dissolved at the end of 1991, 28 years after Kennedy died.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union

If Kennedy had lived, it would likely have ended sooner, perhaps even in the 1960s.

Khrushchev was another leader whose liberalism and possible instability was seen as a threat to the old men in the Kremlin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikita_Khrushchev#Removal

==Excerpt

Beginning in March 1964, Supreme Soviet head Leonid Brezhnev began discussing Khrushchev’s removal with his colleagues.[246] While Brezhnev considered having Khrushchev arrested as he returned from a trip to Scandinavia in June, he instead spent time persuading members of the Central Committee to support the ousting of Khrushchev, remembering how crucial the Committee’s support had been to Khrushchev in defeating the Anti-Party Group plot.[246] Brezhnev was given ample time for his conspiracy; Khrushchev was absent from Moscow for a total of five months between January and September 1964.[247]

Nikita Khrushchev with Anastas Mikoyan in Berlin

The conspirators, led by Brezhnev, First Deputy Premier Alexander Shelepin, and KGB Chairman Vladimir Semichastny, struck in October 1964, while Khrushchev was on vacation at Pitsunda, Abkhazia. On October 12, Brezhnev called Khrushchev to notify him of a special Presidium meeting to be held the following day, ostensibly on the subject of agriculture.[248] Even though Khrushchev suspected the real reason for the meeting,[249] he flew to Moscow to be attacked by Brezhnev and other Presidium members for his policy failures and what his colleagues deemed to be erratic behavior.[250] Khrushchev put up little resistance, and that night called his friend and Presidium colleague Anastas Mikoyan, and told him,

==

Khrushchev may have gone quietly because he had ordered the Kennedy assassination.  He may have felt somewhat to blame as well as the possibility it could be used against him. They would claim he did it for personal reasons and exposed the country to war.

If the Kremlin was a place of such intrigue and uncertainty and risk, they may have felt emboldened to go after Kennedy. They saw him as a threat just like Khrushchev.  Given the Kennedy brother efforts to have Castro assassinated, they may have felt Kennedy was fair game.

So Kennedy and Khrushchev were removed.  The Kremlin settled down to almost 25 years of quiet until a new reformer, Gorbachev and a new antiCommunist destabilized the Soviet Union and ended it.

Did the Kremlin remove two men who were a source of instability and a threat to their rule? One in America, one in Russia?

Overwhelmingly, Russia and Cuba benefited from the removal of Kennedy. Oswald showed support of both and met with both before the assassination.

What of Jack Ruby?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ruby#Associations_with_organized_crime_and_gunrunning_allegations

Discussion of Ruby’s ties to Cuba, mafia, etc.

Russia has a pattern of assassinations world-wide stretching back even to Tsarist times.  Anarchists from Russia also were part of assassinations in the US, including attempted of Frick and President McKinley.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Goldman#Homestead_plot

We know that Putin carried on this tradition with Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2225249/Explosives-traces-crashed-jet-killed-Polish-president-Russia.html

Berezovsky seems likely to have been killed as part of the return of Stanley Fischer to the US, since Berezovsky likely had used kompromat on Stanley Fischer to get IMF loans in the 1990s.  Russia and Israel were covering that up. Obviously, elements of the US government know of this now and likely some have known since the 1990s.

Clinton may have used it to help get IRS audits of Paula Jones because Larry Summers was head of the IRS reorg in the late 1990s including in 1997 and the IRS was without a commissioner during that time.  At that time, Paul Sameulson uncle of Summers was linked to the Fischer plagiraism and Russia’s use of plagiarism. Also possibly involved were Kenneth Arrow and possibly Summers’ own parents as go-betweens in the 1970s to get Arrow to nominate Kantorovich for the Nobel Prize in econ to help get Samuelson from being exposed by Russia then.

LTCM bet on Russia government bonds likely knowing of this history and even being part of it. That was covered up and concealed by Congress including by the Federal Reserve then or since then.

That gives Putin huge leverage over the US establishment.  Leverage he counted on to invade Ukraine and get away with it.

Did Putin invent such bold acts as shooting down MH17 and possibly MH370, Polish airplane, Boston Bombing, etc?  Or was this small change compared to killing Kennedy?  Putin may not be a bold innovator but simply following in long established tradition that has already led to the greatest assassination of the Cold War and which may have given the Soviet Union an extra 10 or even 25 years.

What about other mysteries?  Did al Qaeda get support from Russia? Perhaps intelligence passed through before 9/11?  Did Israel give Russia intel from US that Russia gave to a front group run by a Russian Private Security company like Mongoose or Mangust?  That is linked to Renova Group, Viktor Vekselberg and Alexander Zyurikov.  They have an extensive history in Central Asia and the same places as the Boston Bombing group spent time in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories#Soviet_government_conspiracy

Much later, the highest-ranking Soviet Bloc intelligence defector, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, said that he had a conversation with Nicolae Ceauşescu who told him about “ten international leaders the Kremlin killed or tried to kill”: “László Rajk and Imre Nagy of Hungary; Lucreţiu Pătrăşcanu and Gheorghiu-Dej in Romania; Rudolf Slánský, the head of Czechoslovakia; and Jan Masaryk, that country’s chief diplomat; the Shah of Iran; Palmiro Togliatti of Italy; American President John F. Kennedy; andMao Zedong.” Pacepa provided some additional details, such as a plot to kill Mao Zedong with the help of Lin Biao organized by the KGB and claimed that “among the leaders of Moscow’s satellite intelligence services there was unanimous agreement that the KGB had been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.”[385] Pacepa later released a book, Programmed to Kill: Lee Harvey Oswald, the Soviet KGB, and the Kennedy Assassination, in 2007.

Pavel Sudoplatov was a Soviet intel officer involved in assassinating Trotsky in 1940 in Mexico City. He also was involved in atomic espionage. His book Special Tasks said Oppenheimer, Fermi, and Szilard went along with spying for Russia.  This book came out in 1994 and caused a sensation in the US among physicists who denounced it on PBS News Hour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavel_Sudoplatov

Stanley Fischer became the Deputy IMF Director at IMF in 1994 and Summers handled IMF and Russia at US Treasury.  The big loans from IMF to Russia then started in 1995.  Berezovsky got his loans for shares in 1995.  He was putting pressure on Fischer and Summers it appears.  Vekselberg who was a math Ph.D. in Moscow then rose in mid 1990s likely because he knew Berezovsky in the 1980s when Berezovsky was at the Institute of Control Sciences which did optimization work such as of use in transportation the area of the Moscow university that Vekselberg got his Ph.D.

Zyurikov had a history at cites in Russian Central Asia linked to Russia’s secret scientific work likely including some of the work in Russia’s use of plagiarism kompromat against American profs to get atomic secrets and Nobel Prize nominations and then IMF loans.

Russia’s history of plagiarism kompromat goes back to the 1920s and is closely linked to atomic secrets and economic intrigue at IMF and World Bank.  A soviet spy helped found both of these, Harvard econ Ph.D. Harry Dexter White.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Dexter_White

Harry Dexter White was born in Boston, Massachusetts, the seventh and youngest child of Jewish Lithuanian[3] immigrants, Joseph Weit and Sarah Magilewski, who had settled in America in 1885.

Same background as Stanley Fischer but later and his parents went to Rhodesia where he was born. He then later went to Israel and then MIT in Boston where he plagiarized Nils Hakansson in his Ph.D. and involved Paul Samuelson so that Russia could apply leverage on him. This may have been a joint Israel Russia operation.  Samuelson’s first Ph.D. student was a Communist who then went to Cowles Commission at U of Chicago. Some act possibly of plagiarism occurred there possibly involving the Harry Markowitz thesis at U of Chicago. The Stanley Fischer was copying Hakansson’s extension to multiple periods of the one period portfolio optimization of Roy and Markowitz. The Roy and Markowitz papers were both edited and published at Chicago in 1952.  After that two people were fired by Cowles and the editorial office of Econometrica which published the Roy paper moved to Northwestern from U Chicago. Markowitz could ont get his Ph.D. approved until Cowles left Chicago in 1955. Markowitz got his Ph.D. the first quarter after Cowles Commission left.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Klein

Klein briefly joined the Communist Party during the 1940s, which led to trouble years later.

Paul Samuelson was president of the econometric society around 1952 the time of the firings and possible plagiarism. The same profs who sponsored Hakansson’s thesis that was plagiarized also sponsored that of Markowitz at Chicago, including Koopmans and Jacob Marschak.

Koopmans helped Kantorovich get the Nobel Prize in econ in 1975 and shared it with him. Hakansson was at Yale from 1967 to 1969 with Stiglitz while this was happening.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Marschak

Jacob Marschak (until 1933 Jakob) was born in Kiev as a son of a jeweller. During his studies he joined the social democraticMenshevik Party, becoming a member of the Menshevik International Caucus. In 1918 he was the labor minister in the Terek Soviet Republic. In 1919 he emigrated to Germany, where he studied at the University of Berlin and the University of Heidelberg.

So it all one twisted ball for Russia.  The Kennedy assassination could fit onto a crowed dance card of crime.  Moreover, Kennedy was a threat to Russia. He also might have found out about some of these plots.  If Kennedy had lived he would have been president while the MIT caper was starting in 1967 and 1968.  Kennedy was bad news for Soviet intel ops all around.

Academia in the US was still full of Soviet spies and those who knew but said nothing in the 1960s.  Kennedy was a crusading antiCommunist who inspired the young. He might have cracked much of the Soviet continuing spy apparatus in the US. That in turn could have led to exposure and another crisis with the Soviet Union.  Kennedy’s death ended that possibility.

At any one time, Russia has multiple conspiracies and plots in various stages. These go from planning to cover-up.  At any one time, they may feel that some person is a threat to these plots and remove them.  This has been the entire history of the Soviet Union and to some extent even the Tsarist secret police had a history of operations abroad including in Paris before WWI as well as Central Asia.

The sooner the Stanley Fischer situation is exposed by the universities, Moody’s or the FBI and MI5 the sooner some of this is nipped in the bud. Allowing Russia to get away with these activities, whether Kennedy or not there are enough others, leads them to act more boldly.  The more Russia thinks the FBI and MI5 are covering up for them because of politicians on the top exerting pressure, the bolder they will become. MH17, MH370, Boston Bombing, Berezovsky killing and Ukraine invasion may be part of that boldness from inaction by FBI and MI5.

Putin is former KGB.  To Putin, if the FBI and MI5 help the politicians cover-up it shows the US and UK are paper tigers and he can do anything, even shoot down airplane(s) and get away with it.  He can also feel he can kill inside our countries and get away with it.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

More on Cowles Commission in Chicago.

http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/55495/1/1985-225.pdf

.


Stanley Fischer and Berezovsky death indicate likely linkage

October 5, 2014

Stanley Fischer resigned unexpected in January 2013 the week after I sent an email to MIT asking he be investigated for plagiarism and Russia’s possible use of it to get IMF loans.  I asked them to investigate if Berezovsky was involved.

Berezovsky then dies in March 2013.  Fischer is nominated at end of year for Fed Vice Chairman.  At that point, Berezovsky can’t be questioned by MI5 on behalf of FBI about the hypothesized pressure by Berezovsky and Russia to get IMF loans from Fischer in the 1990s.

Putin brings up Anatoly Chubais after the Boston bombing, just weeks after the death of Berezovsky.

This seems too much for chance.

Once one accepts it is not chance, it implicates Obama in a coverup.  In effect, Obama, Israel and Russia are co-conspirators in killing Berezovsky to cover-up wrong doing by Stanley Fischer.  Obama already has liability through the Larry Summers appointment.

Usual disclaimers.


Isis shows that Muslim immigration is unsafe because change of state can be rapid

September 10, 2014

The sudden rise of ISIS or ISIL is why Muslim immigration is unsafe at any speed.  They can instantly become a powerful force of terrorism and warfare.  Virgil Goode was right. Stop Muslim immigration.  

The New Jersey man illegally fired for burning the Koran by Chris Christie shows who the authorities are targeting.  The continued Muslim immigration after 9/11 while fighting one war after another with Muslims in practically every country they inhabit in numbers shows the insanity of our “leaders”.  Instead those who say the truth like Virgil Goode are treated as insane. This is like the Soviet Union.

 


Case Closed Anthrax Blog one of best public service science detective blogs ever

September 10, 2014

The blog Case Closed by Lew Weinstein featuring comments by Dxer and sometimes others is one of the great public service blogs in the area of science and detection in history.  It has kept alive the 2001 Anthrax attacks, their linkage to the al Qaeda 19 hijackers including their leader Atta, and to the wealth of evidence connecting the attacks to the 19 hijackers.  

FBI agent Van Harp invented a single grower mailer theory not based on considering the evidence for all different theories but simply as an act of will.  Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung is not how to decide to close off investigative options as Harp evidently felt.  The lone mailer idea was contradicted by the evidence from the get-go.  This includes

  1. the injuries to the hijackers consistent with anthrax infection documented by medical authorities,
  2. their location near AMI in Florida,
  3. the timing link to 9/11,
  4. the hoax letters from St. Petersburg Florida to Tom Brokaw who got a real letter when this was not public information,
  5. the evident early lead of the AMI letter,
  6. the testimony that it was the J-Lo letter that was the powder that affected the person who died Robert Stevens,
  7. That all the Florida cases were inhalation anthrax not skin anthrax as were all cases known to be linked to the letters mailed September 18, 2001
  8. The quality of the mailed September 18, 2001 letters sent to New York as Purina Dog Chow, i.e. not capable of spreading inhalation anthrax
  9. The second wave of letters in October that were of the same inhalation quality as AMI earlier
  10. The timing of the AMI letter received September 4, 2001 which adding 7 days for the onset of skin anthrax gives September 11, 2001, which hijackers hoped to time with the attack, but the letter was mislaid
  11. The amount of material which the government’s publication later showed would take longer than a weekend and would be highly variable with many duds,
  12. The presence of high levels of silicon in several letters which shows it is not measurement error. Those silicon levels could not be reproduced in many tens of runs by the government,
  13. The distribution of anthrax to government labs still being covered up in at least one case
  14. The allowing of Muslims and Arabs to gain access to the US biological system in and out of government,
  15. The denial of reality in the name of PC and fear of being fired in and out of government,
  16. The evidence of careful and long term planning of the attacks,
  17. The extensive linkage of the hijackers and al Qaeda to anthrax
  18. The high tech biology research of Alibek and his students who include at least one Muslim likely linked to bad actors
  19. The extensive involvement of the well connected in the research program that allowed this access to Muslims and which even today denies the risk and the loss of know-how
  20. The evident ability of Muslims and suspicious persons to gain access to US government stocks of anthrax,
  21. The poor policing of the entire research of anthrax in and out of government before the anthrax attacks, which is still being denied and covered-up,
  22. The fact that the timing of Ivins time in the labs corresponds to animal checks as shown by Dxer and not to the steps of growing anthrax and producing powder
  23. The inability of Ivins to produce the quantity of anthrax in the letters
  24. The inability of Ivins to turn it into a quality powder fro the lyophilizer not being available
  25. The almost near alibi for Ivins to have reached the unlikely Princeton mailbox for him,
  26. The St. Petersburg hoax letters he could not have sent
  27. The J-Lo letter most likely sent from Florida by the hijackers
  28. The need of the hijackers to commit an illegal act prior to the hijackings that would come out later but was known to the hijackers before the attack so as to prevent them chickening out of the suicide attacks,
  29. The J-Lo anthrax letter met this need.
  30. The timeline corresponds to the hijackers, al Qaeda
  31. The return of Alibek to Kazakhstan where he has a high level position despite Russia’s claim he was leaking state secrets when he came to the West
  32. The need of al Qaeda to show it had anthrax to thwart an invasion of Afghanistan
  33. The need of Russia to show it was involved in a deniable way, but consistent with their MO in the last year and in intervening years such as poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko in London
  34. The mass of evidence and information posted by Dxer
  35. The complete absence of support for the FBI theory from the scientific community except for those employed by the FBI or close to them
  36. Plain common sense that it was al Qaeda that knew of the hijackings beforehand,
  37. The absurd approach of the FBI to discard evidence item by item based on a preconceived management position of a lone mailer instead of comparing the entire set of evidence of multiple people to the set of evidence for a lone person
  38. The failure of the government to explain the science and manner of the making of the high silicon anthrax to this day.
  39. Any lab can try to create high levels of silicon in harmless substitutes for anthrax such as subtilis. To this day, no lab in the world has reported growing such high percent by weight or so many spores as a percent having silicon.
  40. The silicon tin combination which suggests transfer of know-how from Russia, directly or indirectly through intermediaries.
  41. Known linkages from Russia to al Qaeda in the 1990s.
  42. The obvious lying by the government at the time of claiming Ivins did it when they said he had no reason to be in the labs. They had already asked at that point how long it takes to do animal checks to at least one scientist, which indicates they knew of Ivins animal checks already prior to his death. They lied in their press conference and posted materials by concealing this knowledge.

http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/the-holes-in-the-fbi-case-against-ivins-are-huge-will-gao-point-this-out-when-will-gao-report/

No one has kept this alive, gathered more evidence, explained it more or had a better place for debate than the Lew Weinstein blog.  The Meryl Nass blog came close at the time of the Ivins death and some other blogs like Emptywheel can be noted, but none like the Case Closed blog and Dxer.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


More on J-Lo AMI Anthrax Letter and skin v inhalation anthrax

September 9, 2014

The people at AMI in Florida who got anthrax all got inhalation anthrax.  This is true whatever letter they got it from whenever it was sent.  (Assuming a letter and not someone spiking the building directly.)

The J-Lo letter had baby soap like powder which one expert said is how anthrax powder would seem.  Yet the people who handled the J-Lo letter did not get cutaneous anthrax, ie skin anthrax.  Robert Stevens handled the J-Lo letter and he got inhalation anthrax.  

Some might be tempted to say, no one who handled the J-Lo letter got skin anthrax, so the J-Lo letter was not anthrax.  These people have a problem though if they go onto another letter idea. Why didn’t the people who handle the next letter get skin anthrax?   If we assume the AMI anthrax cases all came from letters, then we can’t choose between letters based on people not getting skin anthrax, because no one at AMI got skin anthrax from all letters combined.  

The J-Lo letter did contain toys to attract hands.  This could have caused skin anthrax.  If skin anthrax had resulted, then it would have shown symptoms faster, within 7 days according to the Mayo Clinic link in prior post.  So the mailers may have been hoping to get a skin anthrax case within 7 days of the J-Lo letter reaching AMI on September 4, ie on September 11, 2001.

As it was, the letter was not opened until later, no one got skin anthrax from any anthrax letter at AMI, but at least two people got serious cases of inhalation anthrax.  Inhalation anthrax as the Mayo Clinic link points out can take weeks to develop. Whether the mailers understood this distinction, we don’t know.  But it seems they were planning for September 11 to get anthrax cases if we assume the J-Lo letter was anthrax.

The AMI anthrax was not spread by copier paper, because in a large building, copy paper is distributed in boxes not in individual reams.  So the anthrax could not be spilled into every box of paper.  At most it could get into one box in the mailroom and even that is unlikely.  Instead, the copy machines pull anthrax spores from the air because of some part being electrically charged.

A better timeline should have been constructed at the start of the case.  Instead of assuming a lone mailer, the FBI should have built a timeline of the case from the point of view of each possible suspect.  This would have included the hijackers as a group as well as for a lone mailer.  Then one compares each party’s timeline.  

The J-Lo letter matches up with a hijacker timeline.  It also serves the purpose of the hijackers already committing conspiracy to commit murder before the hijackings. This way, they won’t get cold feet.  Recall that they had made martyrdom videos which were later released.  Having made martyrdom videos clued them in these were suicide jobs.  The martyrdom videos are also meant to shame them into carrying out the suicide attack.  The J-Lo letter as an anthrax letter sent before the attacks does the same thing.

They thought on the morning of 9/11, the anthrax cases would be coming out about that time and so they might as well do the suicide attack and go out with glory as opposed to be arrested for the anthrax letter.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Amerithrax J-Lo Letter was timed to give onset of anthrax on September 11, 2001

September 8, 2014

The J-Lo Letter or Jennifer Lopez Letter was received at AMI on September 4, 2001.  The peak time for anthrax onset is 7 days, so that would put the onset of anthrax from that letter targeted on September 11, 2001.  

According to a source, 

According to the Mayo Clinic, “In most cases, symptoms develop within seven days of exposure to the bacteria.”

http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/J-LoLetter.html

http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anthrax/basics/symptoms/con-20022705

In most cases, symptoms develop within seven days of exposure to the bacteria. The one exception is inhalation anthrax, which may take weeks after exposure before symptoms appear.

 

The J-Lo letter arrived at AMI on September 4, 2001.  Thus going by the first figure, there should have been cases with symptoms on September 11, 2001.

Thus the anthrax onset and the planes hitting World Trade Center would happen at the same time.  

When September 18, 2001 came around, no anthrax cases were reported. So the mailer sent out poor quality material from Princeton and possibly another letter to Florida.  The Princeton letters were all to New York City and they were of low quality as far as can be told.

So these could have been test runs not used that were still available. So they sent those out. If they had a little of the good stuff left, they may have used that in another letter to AMI.

When the September 18 letters seemed to fail, they created another good batch and sent that out.

http://www.postalmag.com/scenario.htm

http://thirdring.wordpress.com/the-letters/

http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/reminder-the-nas-on-demand-meeting-with-the-fbi-is-scheduled-for-tomorrow/comment-page-1/

http://fas.org/irp/threat/cbw/anthrax.pdf

Note it appears the copier machines would attract airborne anthrax and this is why they had spores. Copy paper is distributed in boxes and so it would not be possible for one letter to get into reams which are sealed and are in boxes.   

The mail room itself likely had more copy machines and so attracted more of the spores.

One of the sources says that AMI had a special heavy duty air circulation system.

The sources also give the September 4 date as the date the letter was received at AMI.  So it was sent before then.

Bob Stevens, the only one who died, is known to have closely looked at the J-Lo letter because he was near sighted.  This gave him the most exposure.  The other two who showed signs were mailroom employees.

The J-Lo letter was a honey trap. It had toys to play with and open to insure they got the powder on their hands and inhaled it.  These were inhalation cases showing it was high quality not the Purina Dog Chow quality in the New York media letters sent September 18, 2001.

The J-Lo letter was likely sent from Florida by the hijackers who were nearby. One of the sources indicates they likely bought medicine for anthrax in late August.  This would correspond with their growth of it or receiving it from the grower more likely.  Since the last batch came from Princeton, that might indicate the grower was near Princeton.

The hoax letters that were sent to overlapping people were from Florida and were sent before the public knew of the real anthrax letters.  That may have been intended to heighten awareness.

No AMI letter had a warning unlike all the others.  This would be consistent with it sent before September 11 so as not to alert authorities but to time the onset of anthrax with the hijacking on September 11, 2001.

It also had the effect of sealing the deal. The hijackers could not back out at the last minute, because they knew the anthrax letter had already been set. So they were already in for felony murder charges and conspiracy on that.  This is one reason to have the hijackers be involved in the letters, so they don’t get cold feet at the end.

Anyone who backed out would know the anthrax letters could be traced back to the hijackers through the Florida mailing and the medicine they bought and the ER visit and other traces they expected FBI to track down.

As it was, this obvious point was apparently never considered by the FBI because at a higher level it was decided the anthrax letter was from a lone scientist mailer and not the hijackers. This was against the evidence they had, such as hoax letters to the same people in some cases like Brokaw, going by memory.

The anthrax itself could not be grown in a weekend, and the hijackers knew it. It also had a silicon tin signature which was intended to send a signal that “We have this anthrax, and it is beyond US technology to prepare.” That was intended to cause great fear in the US government.  

Apparently, to damp that down, the high level people made up the lone mailer idea. When Ivins killed himself, that let them pin it on him.

There was never a time in the case that a lone grower and mailer made sense given the evidence at that time. This was forced down on the FBI investigators by a higher level person.  It was never based on science, only on authority.  In fact, it has been plainly contradicted by the evidence the whole time. This is indicated in the various blogs and articles going back to 2001 which state valid evidence then which has held up that it was not a lone mailer.

The insistence on a lone mailer from the top before the evidence was in shows bad faith on the part of the leadership of the government. They wanted to limit fear, particularly since they realized they were not going to solve the anthrax case in a neat package like they later tried with Hatfill and Ivins.  This is consistent with their coverup of the Pakistan and Saudi Arabia involvement documented in the unreleased Senate document.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Does Russia have Caucasus Code Talkers to defeat NSA and MI5?

September 6, 2014

Does Russia use obscure Caucasus languages to defeat the efforts of NSA?  Is this a reason they use Chechens? They can speak one or more of these obscure languages?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_the_Caucasus

The Caucasian languages are a large and extremely varied array of languages spoken by more than ten million people in and around the Caucasus Mountains, which lie between theBlack Sea and the Caspian Sea.

Linguistic comparison allows these languages to be classified into several language families, with little or no discernible affinity to each other. However, the languages of the Caucasus are sometimes mistakenly referred to as a family of languages.

..

Since the birth of comparative linguistics in the 19th century, the riddle of the apparently isolated Caucasian language families has attracted the attention of many scholars, who have endeavored to relate them to each other or to languages outside the Caucasus region. The most promising proposals are connections between the Northwest and Northeast Caucasian families and each other or with languages formerly spoken in Anatolia and northern Mesopotamia.

Perfect for Russian intelligence work.  These languages are so obscure that very few Westerners are aware of their existence let alone can speak them or read them.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Caucasian_languages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Caucasian_languages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Caucasian_languages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Caucasian_languages

The use of such languages and records in them would allow Russia to keep operations secret.   This could let them get away with some of what has happened.

  1. 9/11 support?
  2. Anthrax attacks 9/11
  3. Assassinations such as Boris Berezovsky
  4. MH370
  5. MH17
  6. Other terrorist attacks? 

 This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


What Russia does in secret in Central Asia stays in Central Asia?

September 6, 2014

Russia uses Central Asia for its deep projects?  Things it wants to hide for extended periods of time from Western eyes.

  1. Russia’s use of plagiarism kompromat against academics is heavily done from institutes in Russian Central Asia?
  2. Russia’s use of Muslim front groups to commit terrorist acts inside the West or 3rd world is done from Central Asia?
  3. Russian private security companies like Mangust aka Mongoose of Alexander Zyurikov and Viktor Vekselberg operate in Central Asia to do this?
  4. The anthrax attacks of 9/11 were ultimately through front groups traceable back to Russia?
  5. Even 9/11 was in part plotted by Russia and implemented through front groups?
  6. The killing of Boris Berezovsky?
  7. Other killings?
  8. MH370?
  9. MH17?
  10. Renova Group has been given airport contracts in Russia and possibly in nearby Central Asian republics.  Is it involved?

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Kenneth Alibek made the round trip Russia to US to Kazakhstan

September 5, 2014

In October 1992 he emigrated with his family to the US, despite being forbidden to do so by the KGB.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Alibek#Work_at_Biopreparat-Moscow

 

Kenneth Alibek is back in Kazakhstan.

http://sst.nu.edu.kz/sst/Academics/departments/Biology/Biology_People/KennethAlibek

Alibek has two linkedln profiles. One is current based on back in Kazakhstan.

http://kz.linkedin.com/pub/kenneth-alibek/39/402/530

One says he is in DC, but is stale.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kenneth-alibek/12/803/896

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks

==exceprt

The FBI lab concluded that 1.4% of the powder in the Leahy letter was silicon. Stuart Jacobson, a small-particle chemistry expert stated that:

“This is a shockingly high proportion [of silicon]. It is a number one would expect from the deliberate weaponization of anthrax, but not from any conceivable accidental contamination.”[91]

Scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Labs conducted experiments in an attempt to determine if the amount of silicon in the growth medium was the controlling factor which caused silicon to accumulate inside a spore’s natural coat. The Livermore scientists tried 56 different experiments, adding increasingly high amounts of silicon to the media. All of their results were far below the 1.4% level of the attack anthrax, some as low as .001%. The conclusion was that something other than the level of silicon controlled how much silicon was absorbed by the spores.[91][92]

==end excerpt

There is more on silicon at the link. Basically, the US government does not have the know-how to replicate the high silicon content of some of the recovered sample(s).  The only country with more know-how on anthrax is Russia.  The person who headed their program is Alibek. He is now back in Russia.

The AMI letter(s) had to be before the second batch of letters were sent.  

==excerpt

The anthrax attacks came in two waves. The first set of anthraxletters had a Trenton, New Jersey postmark dated September 18, 2001. Five letters are believed to have been mailed at this time to: ABC News, CBS News, NBC News and the New York Post, all located in New York City and to the National Enquirer atAmerican Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida. [16] Robert Stevens, the first person who died from the mailings, worked at a tabloid called Sun, also published by AMI, died on October 5, 2001, four days after entering a Florida hospital with an undiagnosed illness that caused him to vomit and be short of breath.[17][18] Only the New York Post and NBC Newsletters were found;[19] the existence of the other three letters is inferred because individuals at ABC, CBS and AMI became infected with anthrax. Scientists examining the anthrax from the New York Post letter said it appeared as a coarse brown granular material looking like Purina Dog Chow.[20]

Two more anthrax letters, bearing the same Trenton postmark, were dated October 9, three weeks after the first mailing. The letters were addressed to two Democratic Senators, Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Patrick Leahy of Vermont. At the time, Daschle was the Senate Majority leader and Leahy was head of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Daschle letter was opened by an aide, Grant Leslie, on October 15, and the government mail service was shut down. The unopened Leahy letter was discovered in an impounded mail bag on November 16. The Leahy letter had been misdirected to the State Department mail annex in Sterling, Virginia, due to a misread ZIP code; a postal worker there, David Hose, contracted inhalational anthrax.

More potent than the first anthrax letters, the material in the Senate letters was a highly refined dry powder consisting of about one gram of nearly pure spores. A series of conflicting news reports appeared, some claiming the powders had been “weaponized” with silica. Bioweapons experts who later viewed images of the attack anthrax saw no indication of “weaponization”.[21] Tests by Sandia National Laboratories in early 2002 confirmed that the attack powders were not weaponized.[22][23]

==end excerpt

AMI building was closed until 2007. NBC, CBS,  and New York Post buildings were never closed.  The Senate buildings and AMI were closed for extended periods.  Thus the AMI had to be subjected to high quality anthrax not just Purina dog chow quality.

This creates some problems for the Ivins theory.

Suppose Ivins had started growing the first letter anthrax on Friday September 14, 2001 in the evening. He then centrifuged it on Saturday night and spread it out to dry on paper towels.  Then on Sunday night he put the letters together and mailed them Monday night.  Suppose that this drying plus any speed vacing or heating led to Purina dog chow quality.  In that case, the AMI building would not have been needed to be closed for an extended period like the Senate building.

==excerpt

Dozens of buildings were contaminated with anthrax as a result of the mailings. AMI moved to a different building. The decontamination of the Brentwood postal facility took 26 months and cost $130 million. The Hamilton, New Jersey postal facility[180] remained closed until March 2005; its cleanup cost $65 million. TheUnited States Environmental Protection Agency spent $41.7 million to clean up government buildings in Washington, D.C. One FBI document said the total damage exceeded $1 billion.[181]

The principal means of decontamination is fumigation with chlorine dioxide gas.

== end excerpt

http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/formeramibldganthraxfree.html

=excerpt

Former AMI building declared free of anthrax contamination

By Gretel Sarmiento, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Thursday, February 08, 2007

WEST PALM BEACH — Federal environmental experts have concluded that the former American Media Inc. building in Boca Raton has been cleared of the anthrax spores that killed a photo editor more than five years ago and shuttered the tabloid publisher’s headquarters.

The 160-page report was sent to Dr. Jean Malecki, director of the Palm Beach County Health Department. She will review it and decide by next week whether the building, which she ordered closed on Oct. 10, 2001, can reopen.

Malecki did not indicate Wednesday what her decision would be, but her reaction after getting the positive assessment was clear.

“It was a relief,” she said. “It’s been five years of my life. But it will be over soon, I guarantee it.”

The report’s conclusion: “In summary, based in the information available, the technical working group concludes that the measures used to treat and remove B. anthracis at the former AMI building at 5401 Broken Sound Blvd. were successful.

“The technical working group believes that the building can be safely reoccupied, normal working activities resumed, and building contents reused.”

== end excerpt

So the AMI building had to be subjected to high quality anthrax powder not Purina dog chow. CBS, NBC were never closed.

The person at AMI was already dead before the second letters were sent. Those also tie to a certain period of time of Ivins in the hot suite. So Ivins did not have the opportunity at another time to send the high quality AMI letter(s) or however anthrax arrived at AMI.

The hours of Ivins in the B3 Suite preclude him having done a high quality mailing prior to the second batch, and so Ivins is ruled out. Someone had to send a high quality letter(s) or delivery means to AMI to kill the first person October 5, 2001, 4 days before the second letters were sent.

The AMI letter must have been dried using a lyophilizer.  It could not be turned into high quality powder by simply letting it dry on a paper towel or heating it crudely.  Ivins did not have access to a lyophilizer into the hot suites at any relevant time.  Thus Ivins could not have sent the AMI letter(s) if it was letters or delivered it by some other means.  

Ivins did not have a lyophilizer for the second batch either, and so that is also outside his means.  The second batch at a minimum was a lyophilized.

It would appear the CBS, NBC, Post letters may have been done by letting the anthrax dry after centrifuging or some other ad hoc method that did not include a lyophiilizer.  Ivins never had access to a working lyophilizer in the B3 Suite.  The Purina dog chow anthrax is what you get without using a lyophilizer.  The Senate anthrax and AMI required at least a lyophilizer to dry them.  So Ivins is out.

It seems likely that there were 2 mailers. The first may have been 9/11 hijacker types or others linked to them. They sent the Purina Dog Chow quality anthrax.  

Another group sent the high quality including the high silicon.  That would appear to be either Russia or some group receiving aid from Russia directly or through a front group. That could be from a Russian private security company like Mangust or Mongoose. Alexander Zyurikov of Mongoose has a career that overlaps with Kenneth Alibek in Soviet Central Asis during the USSR.  

Russia could have sent the high silicon anthrax to send a message that only they could do that. They had the motive to tell the US not to pressure them, because they could do terrorism through front groups. Boston bombing, MH370 and MH17 follow that same MO.  Possibly the same for the killing of Boris Berezovsky and possibly others in 2013.

Alexander S. Zyurikov
Deputy Chairman of the Executive Board, Director for Security Born in 1951.

Graduated from Omsk Higher School under the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs,
Academy of Management under the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs. Worked in detective force of law enforcement agencies in the Novosibirsk region, Uzbekistan, USSR/ Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs. Headed a branch directorate of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Since 1997 €“ General Director of OOO Mongoose-Service (private security firm).

==

Alibek Wiki

==excerpt

Youth and early career[edit]

Kenneth Alibek was born Kanat Alibekov in Kauchuk, in the Kazakh SSR of the Soviet Union (in present day Kazakhstan) to a Kazakh family and grew up in Almaty, the republic’s former capital.

His exceptional academic performance while studying military medicine at the Tomsk Medical Institute and his family’s noted patriotism led to his selection to work for Biopreparat, the secret biological weapons program overseen by the Soviet Union’s Council of Ministers. His first assignment (1975) was to the Eastern European Branch of the Institute of Applied Biochemistry (IAB) near Omutninsk, a combined pesticide production facility and reserve biological weapons production plant intended for activation in a time of war. At Omutninsk, Alibekov mastered the art and science of formulating and evaluating nutrient media and cultivation conditions for the optimization of microbial growth. It was here that he expanded his medical school laboratory skills into the complex skill set required for industrial level production of microorganisms and their toxins.[2]

After less than a year at Omutninsk, Alibekov was transferred to the Siberian Branch of the IAB near Berdsk (another name of the branch was the Berdsk scientific and production base). With the assistance of a colleague, he designed and constructed a microbiology research and development laboratory that worked on techniques to optimize production of biological formulations. After several promotions over a short period of time, Alibekov was transferred back to Omutninsk where he quickly rose to the position of Deputy Director. He was soon transferred to the Kazakhstan Scientific and Production Base in Stepnogorsk (another reserve BW facility) to become the new Director of that facility. Officially, he was Deputy Director of the Progress Scientific and Production Association, a manufacturer of fertilizer and pesticide. AtStepnogorsk, Alibekov created the most efficient industrial scale assembly line for biological formulations. In a time of war, the assembly line could be used to produce weaponized anthrax. Continued successes in science and biotechnology led to more promotions which resulted in a transfer to Moscow.[3]

==

Mangust or Mongoose now operates from Kazakhstan among other places in Russia and Central Asia including Uzbekistan.  So it may be that Mangust aka Mongoose Zyurikov and Alibek were responsible for the high quality anthrax attacks possibly through al Qaeda front groups.  This would be similar to the Boston Bombing being manipulated through front groups by Mangust or Russian FSB/SVR.

==

Russia wanted to send a signal with the high percentage silicon that they were ultimately behind the anthrax mailings through front groups or however.  This was meant to say to the US not to exploit the situation after 9/11 against Russia’s interest.  

After the Boston Bombing, Putin brought up Anatoly Chubais to implicate Shleifer as a CIA agent. Russia blamed the Moscow Apartment bombings in 1999 on the CIA as well as arranging the killing of Dudayev to be on a day Bill Ciinton was in Russia while he was president.  Strobe Talbott wrote in his book before Boston Bombing that Clinton congratulated Yeltsin on the kill.

The high level silicon and high quality powder and Alibek going back to Kazakhstan are consistent with Russia being behind the anthrax attacks directly or indirectly.  

Alibek sort of defected to the US, then returned to Kazakhstan. Alibek revealed the extent of Russia’s anthrax program. Russia did not kill him like it did Alexander Litvinenko even though Alibek returned to Kazakhstan after revealing state secrets.  

It has been suggested that Russia sent Alibek to reveal its anthrax program in the 1990s to tell the US not to take advantage of the fall of the USSR.  Alibek sent the message, “We have this anthrax.” The mailings with high silicon said Russia has this anthrax and it is willing to use it on the US Senate.

It is known the US won’t release the Senate report on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in the 9/11 attacks.  The US government is thus known to conceal information about foreign governments participating in or assisting in attacks on the United States or Americans.

It is possible that parts of the US government think Russia was responsible for the anthrax attacks or part of them, directly or indirectly.  Following the same protocol as for Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the US could then withhold information it has on the involvement of Russia (or Pakistan as well with front groups or Saudi Arabia) in the anthrax attacks.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.