http://stagheath.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/bailouts-based-on-urban-legend/
David Stockman would not have bailed out AIG. The Stag Heath blog is full of brilliant comments. He names his blog Stag Heath but signs stagheath one word lower case. Using stagheath would be best for search engines.
Results 1 – 41 of 41 for “stagheath”.
Auster comments on a Stag Heath article:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/08/avlon.tea.party.future/
This is the crowd that carries the signs comparing Obama to Hitler and communists, while proclaiming themselves patriots. Their extremism will ultimately lead the movement to self-destruct unless it is clearly repudiated.
Actually, this is the Tea Party and they need to clearly repudiate Dick Armey, white race replacement and John Avlon.
Neocon and Rudi race replacer Giuliani acolyte John Avlon vents hatred at the real core of the Tea Party movement whom he calls the fringe. Every advice he gives to the Tea Party should be reversed. Avlon is anti Tea Party just like Dick Armey.
While Tax Day 2009 Tea Parties attracted some 300,000 people nationwide, this convention accommodated just 600 people, who paid nearly $500 each for the privilege of attending the populist conference.
600 times 500 dollars is 300,000 dollars. Sarah Palin got 100,000 dollars. How much did George Washington get for attending the Continental Congress? How much did Thomas Jefferson get for writing the Declaration of Independence? At these rates, its time to repudiate Sarah Palin as the same sort of leech as neocons, whose philosophy she happens to share. The Tea Party should not pay Neocon Welfare.
Frum-ling Avalon records the horror of extremists at the Tea Party
Former congressman Tom Tancredo accused the president of being a “committed socialist ideologue” and proposed a civic literacy test for voting.
WorldNet Daily founder Joseph Farah used his post-dinner speech, covered by C-Span, to repeat inane “Birther” claims.
Alabama gubernatorial candidate and former state Supreme Court chief justice Roy Moore said Obama had “ignored our history and our heritage, arrogantly declaring to the world that we are no longer a Christian nation.”
…
For the Tea Party momentum to continue in a constructive way, it will need to take at least two further steps: First, repudiate the unhinged Obama-haters and then focus its anger at fiscal irresponsibility into policy proposals instead of bumper-sticker platitudes.
The Tea Party movement is not unhinged Obama-haters. This is a Neocon Lie from the practitioners of the Big Lie.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-big-schlei-1965-immigration-act/
http://www.frumforum.com/author/JohnA
Ten years ago, before the Bush/Cheney/Rove/DeLay-era, centrist Republican congressmen and mayors dotted the Northeast – and only two states north of (and including) Pennsylvania had Democratic governors. Today, they are an endangered species. The phrase “urban Republican” – an idea once embodied by Rudy Giuliani and Steve Goldsmith – sounds more and more like an oxymoron.
Wasn’t that the Frum Axis of Evil Neocons Era as well? Neocons who invited the world to race replace whites in America, Europe, Canada and Australia? Who can’t see White Farm Murders in South Africa as the terrorism that never dies?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Avlon
http://rawstory.com/2010/02/christians-claim-hate-crimes-law-effort-eradicate-beliefs/
There is a hate thread at Raw Story against white Christians. At the bottom of each page, click load more comments. It goes on and on. The hate against white Christians from the Left is what Eric Holder and Barack Hussein Obama were tapping when they got the Democratic Party in Congress to vote for the Hate Crimes bill. This was a hate bill against whites and Christians. Democrats voting against the hate crimes bill like Jim Webb and Mark Warner of Virginia were voting for hate against whites and Christians. This thread proves it.
== Press Release excerpt Thomas More Center
http://www.thomasmore.org/qry/page.taf?id=19
The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor Michigan, this morning filed a federal lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., challenging the constitutionality of the recently-enacted federal Hate Crimes Act. The Act criminalizes so-called “bias” crimes motivated by a person’s “actual or perceived” “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” and thus elevates those engaged in certain deviant sexual behaviors to a special, protected class of persons under federal law.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, on behalf of Pastor Levon Yuille, Pastor Rene Ouellette, Pastor James Combs, and Gary Glenn, the president of the American Family Association of Michigan (AFA-Michigan). [Read Complaint].
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, and a former county prosecutor, commented, “There is no legitimate law enforcement need for this federal law. Of the 1.38 million violent crimes reported in the U.S. by the FBI in 2008, only 243 were considered as motivated by the victim’s sexual orientation. Moreover, Eric Holder himself testified at a Senate hearing that the states are doing a fine job in this area.”
Thompson continued, “This is part of the list of political payoffs to homosexual advocacy groups for support of Barack Obama in the last presidential election. The sole purpose of this law is to criminalize the Bible and use the threat of federal prosecutions and long jail sentences to silence Christians from expressing their Biblically-based religious belief that homosexual conduct is a sin. It elevates those persons who engage in deviant sexual behaviors, including pedophiles, to a special protected class of persons as a matter of federal law and policy.”
http://www.thomasmore.org/downloads/sb_thomasmore/Complaint-HateCrimes2010.pdf
==End excerpt
==OA comment at Raw Story and replies
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 20 hours ago
Hate crime laws are just race replacement of whites.
Flag
Reply Reply
#
HeilMary1 [Moderator] 19 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
No, Moldy ASSlantic, hate crime laws are about preventing Nazi traitors like YOU from murdering or encouraging the murders of peaceful non-whites, non-christians, and born hermaphrodite (gay) people. You are a disgrace to whites, christians and straights!
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 19 hours ago in reply to HeilMary1
Whites and Christians are not protected by the Eric Holder Obama hate crime law.
Flag
Reply Reply
#
dennycrane [Moderator] 9 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
….only by fascist corporations, which we shall soon see. Plus, those lying commercials about abortion that your Capitalist Broadcasting System presented today on the “Whitey Bowl.”
Flag
Like Reply Reply
Replying to dennycrane
Logout
Registered OldAtlantic (change name or picture)
930 comments 562 liked 124 points
Share on Share this comment on…
Configure options…
Post as OldAtlanticCancel
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 0 minutes ago in reply to dennycrane
The bowl seems to be picking up African culture not the other way around.
Flag
Edit Reply Reply
#
LumberJock [Moderator] 16 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
Holder & O’Bama didn’t ‘write’ the law. It was there before they were in office.
Good thing you’re at the head of the truther brigade — so others know just how whacked out you are!
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#
* Expand ⇗
* Registered
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 15 hours ago in reply to LumberJock
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/26/a-g-h…
26 June 2009
A-G Holder: No Hate Crime Protection for White Christians or Servicemen
[Patrick Cleburne]
Flag
Reply Reply
#
dennycrane [Moderator] 9 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
…the key here, as it started out: “blog.”
Flag
Like Reply Reply
Replying to dennycrane
Logout
Registered OldAtlantic (change name or picture)
930 comments 562 liked 124 points
Share on Share this comment on…
Configure options…
Post as OldAtlanticCancel
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 0 minutes ago in reply to dennycrane
Its the blog section. NYT has blog in URL as well. Search NYT blog.
Flag
Edit Reply Reply
#
HeilMary1 [Moderator] 18 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
Whites and Christians should NOT get get-out-of-jail passes from Eric Holder when they excuse their crimes based on being “white” and “christian”, you dumb ass bigot!
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 18 hours ago in reply to HeilMary1
Holder said that its not a hate crime under his law for whites or Christians to be targeted for being white or Christian. Black rapes of whites are an example of what is not protected. Blacks pick out whites to rape them based on their being white.
Flag
Edit Reply Reply
#
Lyman [Moderator] 20 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
HeilMary1 liked this.
Go smoke your tea bag.
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 18 hours ago in reply to HeilMary1
Holder said that its not a hate crime under his law for whites or Christians to be targeted for being white or Christian. Black rapes of whites are an example of what is not protected. Blacks pick out whites to rape them based on their being white.
Flag
Edit Reply Reply
#
Lyman [Moderator] 20 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
HeilMary1 liked this.
Go smoke your tea bag.
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 19 hours ago in reply to Lyman
I drink iced tea, I don’t smoke lib fallacies.
Flag
Reply Reply
#
dennycrane [Moderator] 9 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
Go smoke those “fish” symbols.Yeah, I know they are too hard to keep lit.
Flag
Like Reply Reply
Replying to dennycrane
Logout
Registered OldAtlantic (change name or picture)
932 comments 562 liked 124 points
Share on Share this comment on…
Configure options…
Post as OldAtlanticCancel
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 0 minutes ago in reply to dennycrane
Burned some Christian symbols have you?
Flag
Edit Reply Reply
#
HeilMary1 [Moderator] 18 hours ago in reply to OldAtlantic
You smoke Nazi fallacies, you tea bag on ice!
Flag
Like Reply Reply
Replying to HeilMary1
Logout
Registered OldAtlantic (change name or picture)
932 comments 562 liked 124 points
Share on Share this comment on…
Configure options…
Post as OldAtlanticCancel
#
OldAtlantic [Moderator] 0 minutes ago in reply to HeilMary1
There is a blizzard.
==
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/06/16/eric-holder-demagogues-hate-crimes/
Links to Cleburne series at Vdare on hate crimes bill in 2009
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/hate-crimes/
Eric Holder whites hate crimes
http://araceagainsttime.blogspot.com/2009/06/attorney-general-holder-whites-not.html
http://araceagainsttime.blogspot.com/2009/09/hate-crime-reporting-deck-is-stacked.html
Bob Unruh letter Feb 3 2010 to Mark Warner.
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=48778&letter_id=4628763031
The thread at Raw Story shows that lib hatred of Christians is really hatred of whites. They are engaged in ethnic cleansing of whites. That is admitted in the following thread at Raw Story:
http://rawstory.com/2010/02/nigerian-militants-claim-attack-shell-oil-pipeline/
Scroll down to comments responding to Old Atlantic. Many libs admit they are advocating ethnic cleansing and genocide of whites and the white race. When the Democrats in Congress voted for the Holder Obama hate crimes bill, they were voting for genocide and ethnic cleansing of whites. That was they cast their votes for.
This proves that whites who think its safe to keep quite while Congress legislates the genocide of whites are mistaken. Sarah Palin is mistaken to not take the white side in this fight. The Tea Party is mistaken not to take the white side in this debate. They are white and they are targeted for ethnic cleansing by the Democrats and Left for being white.
The Republicans in Congress go along with it. The Tea Party has decided to follow the GOP example. Its being misled by Sarah Palin. Corporate lobbyist Dick Armey got in early to misdirect the Tea Party movement away from white rights and white survival.
Armey’s cooption and corruption of the Tea Party Movement is discussed with links to sources here:
The Tea Party movement is ending up just holding the bag for the CEO Pac, GOP and Democrats. Its paying lip service to the left. As Auster would say, its liberal through and through. This destroys it from stopping the real problem, genocide of whites. Its the race replacement of whites that is causing the bankruptcy of our institutions and the loss of our leadership in the world and dominance in manufacturing, science and technology.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
The genocide and race replacement of whites has a name in science, Wright Island Model. The hate crimes bill of Obama Holder is part of the war on whites. That is what the Democrats in Congress voted for when they passed it. That is what Jim Webb and Mark Warner voted for when they voted for it.
Clemons says Core Chicago Team Sinking Obama Presidency. He is right. It starts from the real core, Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Louis Farrakhan and Saul Alinsky. Trotsky was never in Chicago but he is on the team.
Steve Clemons
Publisher of “The Washington Note”
Posted: February 7, 2010 12:05 PMFinancial Times Washington Bureau Chief Edward Luce has written a granularly informed insider account about those who hold the keys to the inner most sanctum of Obama Land — Rahm Emanuel, Robert Gibbs, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod.
The Tea Party convention met during a jobs depression. Private sector jobs are barely over what they were in total numbers 10 years ago. But population is over 25 million more. Over 1 million legal immigrants enter each year. Others not classified as immigrants enter legally as well. Many of them take jobs of one type or another.
The Tea Party did not call for a legal immigration moratorium nor even a decrease. It didn’t call for ending H-1b. Narrow official unemployment is on the order of 10 percent. U-6 is on the order of 15 to 20 percent. Actual unemployment is far greater. Underpayment of those with jobs except at the top is widespread. All are caused by legal immigration and the descendants of post 1965 immigrants or entrants, legal or not. The Tea Party has no relief for this. When is the Tea Party going to be for us on jobs, wages, and race replacement by immigration if not now? We are in a jobs and wages crisis now.
The Tea Party is for fiscal restraint while states like California go bankrupt from non-white immigration? There are teacher furloughs in Hawaii from non-white immigration and state collapse. State pensions present an increasing burden that will crowd out schools. How do these non-white immigrants get educated with teacher furlough days? What about eliminating science because it helps whites in California?
For the Tea Party to claim to be for fiscal constraint while its not trying to end non-white immigration is to be a fraud. If they can’t speak up against non-white immigration while California is going bankrupt and schools in California and other states have fewer days for white and non-white students because non-whites are bankrupting California is to be a fraud.
If the Tea Party can’t speak up during a jobs depression, during teacher furlough days in California, during the bankruptcy of states from non-white immigration, when will it? If the Tea Party can’t be for us now on jobs, wages, and the bankrupting of states, when is it going to be for us? Its a fraud.
The mis-leaders of the Tea Party movement like Dick Armey and Sarah Palin have joined with the new Wall Street CEO Pac to take jobs from Americans by immigration. The Tea Party supports the same race replacement of whites by legal immigrants as the Wall Street CEO Pac does. If your job requires a mind, Palin and the Tea Party have someone from India or China to take it. If your job requires a back, they have someone from Mexico to take it. They are on the same page as the Wall Street CEO Pacs and Michael Steele and New Gingrich.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015344.html
Paul K transcribed Sarah Palin on Glenn Beck on immigration
Palin:
Let me address legal immigration. We need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty. The immigrants, of course, built this country, and I think Republicans, conservatives, are at fault when we allow the other side to capture this immigration issue and try to turn this issue into something negative for Republicans. I think we need to recognize that, again, immigrants built this great country. There are rules to follow if you want to be part of this great country–let’s be sure people are following those rules–but let’s welcome this.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/02/07/opposition-notes-palin-wobbly-on-immigration/
7 February 2010
Opposition Notes Palin Wobbly On Immigration
[James Fulford] @ 1:06 am [Email author] [Email this article] [Print this article] [Print this article]It’s worrisome that Tamar Jacoby isn’t worried about Palin, while Paul Streitz is.
http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/profiles/blogs/ct-citizens-for-immigration
Paul Streitz:
Sarah Palin is now aligned herself with several bad actors. What should this be called, the Rinoization of Sarah Palin? Governor Perry of Texas has always been an open borders advocate. And Bill O’Reilly has always been lukewarm on immigration.
In the intervening months, she has done little but promote herself as a celebrity, known because her brief time on the national political stage.
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=b4cc03dbd6820b4b82cb77f47573dce2
Immigration “is one of our main issues in the state of North Carolina,” said David DeGerolamo, co-founder of Tea Party group NC Freedom, in a phone interview. “And what it comes down to is that the United States is a republic based on the rule of law. What part of illegal is right?”
People who say that are following the Lou Dobbs line which supports legal race replacement immigration. Legal immigration is over 1 million per year. All by itself it leads to minority status for whites. Keeping a white majority requires not just stopping legal non-white immigration but reversing past non-white immigration. The Tea Party is another PC anti-white movement in substance just like Palin. They are preventing a real revolution to save the white majority.
Joining a grass roots political movement to be afraid to speak out is to be against oneself. The Tea Party is joining the establishment in opposing white racial interests. Whites need to assert their white right to be the majority not become part of the McCain Steele Palin neocon line for race replacement of whites. A white who says he is only against illegal immigration has sacrificed every argument, racial or economic or genetic, against immigration. Being against illegal only immigration is to concede the argument for legal immigration and for whites to be a minority at Harvard and in the country and in every department of government and of banks and corporations.
http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/dick-armey-to-visit-tampa-taxpayer-tea-party
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-brody/dick-armey-discusses-the_b_446482.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/the-corporate-lobbyists-b_b_186367.html
FreedomWorks is run by ladies’ man (and registered lobbyist) Dick Armey, and if they’re not “organizing” the Tea parties, it’s news to him. From a letter he wrote on March 10:
FreedomWorks has been organizing many of these “tea parties” and we are listing the details on our website IamWithRick.com
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/a-teabagger-timeline-koch_b_187312.html
A Teabagger Timeline: Koch, Coors, Newt, Dick Armey There From The Start
The movement was infiltrated from the start by agents of influence of the establishment. This is why it is neutral, which means for, legal immigration and non-white immigration and for whites becoming a minority. Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey are for a white minority.
The Tea Party “Movement” is funded and organized by Dick Armey’s lobbyist run think tank “Freedom Works”.
Dick Armey, who is ranked as one of DC’s top “hired guns,” is a corporate lobbyist with a history of directing FreedomWorks to support the goals of his lobbying clients.
Momma Kass
Dick Armey immigration Tea Party
All immigration votes of Dick Armey:
http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=TX&VIPID=915
Nearly doubled H-1B foreign
high-tech workers in 1998 Rep. Armey helped the House pass H.R.3736. Enacted into law, it increased by nearly 150,000 the number of foreign workers high-tech American companies could hire over the next three years. Although the foreign workers receive temporary visas for up to six years, most historically have found ways to stay permanently in this country. Rep. Armey voted for more foreign workers even though U.S. high tech workers over the age of 50 were suffering 17% unemployment and U.S. firms were laying off thousands of workers at the time.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
The Tea Party is another group that is for this by legal immigration.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-236.pdf
Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, see graph page 18. The Tea Party is for this by legal immigration just like the CEO Pac is. They are the same. The Tea Party movement is afraid to be for itself.
Jobs barely increased in the last 10 years while population went up over 25 million. The Tea Party is for that to continue. Non-Jewish whites are 20 percent of undergraduates at Harvard, Stanford, UCLA and Berkeley. Chinese and Indians get Ph.D. fellowships at these schools in math and science instead of whites. The Tea Party is for that to continue.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/total-10-year-job-gains-negative-203k/
Links to stats on whites at colleges at link below.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/us/politics/04conservative.html
The organizers, including former Senator Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the senior policy adviser to Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign, describe their emerging American Action Network as a center-right version of the Center for American Progress, the six-year-old group for progressive policies that was founded by John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and an informal adviser to President Obama.
They are the same PAC in fact. They both support race replacement immigration and keeping wages low. Just like Sarah Palin does.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015612.html
Palin’s in it for the money like the libs say. She is cashing in and abandoning us.
Norm Coleman’s votes on immigration:
http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=MN&VIPID=1082
Voted on Senate floor in favor of guestworker-amnesty bill by voting in favor of a motion to bring bill to the Senate floor for a debate and a vote in 2007
Voted in favor of bill to increase immigration and grant amnesty to illegal aliens in 2006 Sen. Coleman voted in favor of final passage of S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. S. 2611 would dramatically change most occupations and communities in America with the largest movement of foreign workers in world history. Specifically, S. 2611 would: reward approximately 10.2 million illegal aliens with an amnesty allowing them to permanently take American jobs and become U.S. citizens; entice millions more foreign workers to illegally enter our communities, crowd the housing and schools, take the jobs and depress the wages because they reasonably can believe they eventually will be given an amnesty, too; double legal immigration from 1 million to 2 million a year; give out permanent green cards to up to 66 million foreign workers and dependents over the next 20 years. The main difference in terms of numbers between the final version of S. 2611 and the version of the bill when the cloture motion was invoked was that the Bingaman Amendment to cap the number of employment-based visas for workers, spouses and children at 650,000 was adopted after cloture but before final passage. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation estimates that the Bingaman Amendment would reduce employment-based visas available under S. 2611 by about 150,000 a year. S. 2611 passed by a vote of 62 to 36.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02611:
This is another reminder of why the immigration restriction movement and pro-white movements are making a mistake not to push the Wright Island Model. Its a math theorem that shows that legal immigration and anchor baby both by themselves cause our race replacement. Our movement can’t even get the Tea Party to acknowledge this. The reason is because it won’t use authoritative science that is in its favor. The WIM proves as a math theorem that non-white immigration is about race replacement of whites. But our side won’t use it to make even the Tea Party admit that. That’s moral failure.
Obama has repeated the worst mistakes of Bush and Clinton.
Obama has not repeated Clinton’s successes.
Clinton stands out as the best president of the last 20 years. Bush Sr increased legal immigration and so stands out as bad as well.
Jeffrey Imm disputes the idea that partial inequality is optimal.
http://www.realcourage.org/2010/02/supremacism-is-always-wrong/
This in his discussion of Jared Taylor and the American Renaissance Conference that Imm at one time claimed to have gotten removed from the Dulles Westin. The phrase partial equality appeared in my earlier post.
I started with the title for the post that equality, liberty and diversity are not compatible with the others. This is in the sense that each is a cost to the other. Diversity is itself a bad not a good. This is shown by history, Putnam’s study, the attempts of people to live with their own, voting for their own for office, etc. It is embedded genetically in us. It is not limited to humans, although some species are less sociable.
In writing the post, I realized, however that the relationship was not in one direction between equality and liberty. Excessive equality will clearly make Liberty impossible. This is true of any system, it doesn’t have to be humans. Take a set of numbers, two will suffice. If the numbers are equal, the degrees of freedom of one is not two. Thus equality has eliminated liberty completely. This applies by induction to a set of n numbers.
We can then extend this to anything we can measure by numbers. Partial equality would be a state where the set of numbers are partially constrained but not fully constrained. Thus a departure from equality is necessary for liberty.
However, extreme inequality in human societies also reduces liberty. Think of a set of particles. If one particle has all the kinetic energy and momentum then the others are at rest. Thus extreme inequality causes almost a total loss of liberty.
Money or wealth can substitute for energy. In a society where one person owns everything, liberty is low for the rest. Thus extreme inequality can reduce the number of degrees of freedom of the social system and thus of liberty.
If liberty is extreme, then equality will be low.
Equality is zero is no real desirable equality, particularly if it means equality in the form of equal non-existence. That is what immigration gives us, see the Wright Island Model discussion below.
To summarize:
Liberty implies inequality. So inequality is a necessary but not sufficient condition for liberty. Liberty and equality are not consistent. a large dose of one implies a substantial shortfall in the other. Some states of inequality may imply a low level of liberty,
in particular extreme inequality implies low liberty.
So we are left with moderate inequality if we want substantial liberty. But an excess of inequality will work against liberty.
Moreover, search is part of optimality. Randomness is necessary for dealing with high dimensional problems. Human society is a high dimensional problem. It requires search. But it also requires keeping good searches not losing them to theft or chaos. That is where diversity comes in, especially for whites. Third worlders destroy the results of successful search by white societies, including of genes favorable to white concepts of civilization.
This is seen in schools, areas that were white and then ethnically cleansed by non-whites, etc. Posner has commented on the loss of competence in our country. This is caused by diversity. Corruption has been associated with diversity. Putnam has documented that diversity, especially adding non-whites to white societies increases distrust. This is no surprise since it increases measured social dysfunction.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/black-crime-rate-1900-1958-2005/
Black crime has been documented as consistently very high for over 100 years. Jared Taylor has contributed to that analysis.
== Some links from above article
http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2008/06/achievement-gap-circa-1900.html
“Will Education Solve The Race Problem?
By Professor John Roach Straton, Of Mercer University”
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm
“
In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites
“
I work out from BJS DOJ stats that the average of violent
crimes per black man is 4 to 8 over his lifetime.
Jared Taylor “Color of Crime”
http://www.amren.com/ar/1999/07/index.html#cover
==
Diversity harms liberty for whites. It also harms equality. That is why Bill Gates is in favor of it. Bill Gates has non-white only scholarships after he sponsored H-1b’s to keep down white wages.
http://www.nationofcowards.us/?p=4423
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-236.pdf
Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, women’s the same as men’s were in 1963. This is caused by immigration and in particular non-white immigration from the 3rd world. America has been kept down as Japanese officials have tried to tell us from time to time, including their Justice Department.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/
Immigration implies that the survival probability of every lineage here asymptotes to zero. This is a form of equality, but not of liberty. This loss of non-zero equality and liberty is what is offered by liberalism. Its just race replacement as the math shows. It erases successful searches, ie the evolution of genes and culture. Whites have traveled a unique road of human evolution.
The common law, Bill of Rights, altruism, etc. are the virtues of white civilization. But immigration erases them.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/
==Generalized Genocide quote from Wiki (they don’t use that term but we define the following as generalized genocide)
Lemkin’s broader concerns over genocide, as set out in his “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe”, [5] also embraced what may be considered as non-physical, namely, psychological acts of genocide which he personally defined as:
Appendix
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/
http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm
White minority at Harvard(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)
Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates. Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.
http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem
30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.
==
http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html
Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%
Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5. The 20 percent Jewish at Stanford is not in the following list but is a reasonable estimate. The result is the same whatever number within reason is used as a plug.
http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem
http://collegeprowler.com/uc-berkeley/diversity/
Whites at Berkeley are 31 percent. That includes Jews. Take out 20 percent and you are down to 11 percent like Stanford. This is a university founded and made great by non Jewish whites from nothing.
http://berkeley.edu/about/fact.shtml#freshman
70% have at least one parent born outside the U.S. (2008)
Living alumni: 431,500 (August 2009)
http://metrics.vcbf.berkeley.edu/Berkeley%20Template.pdf
Race/Ethnicity
Counts for the Fall 2003 entering class shown in the graph above:
Total 24,636
African American / Black 841 3%
American Indian / Alaskan Native 126 1%
Asian / Pacific Islander 10,272 42%Hispanic 2,839 12%
White 7,755 31% •
Race/Ethnicity Unknown 2,017 8%
Total Citizens and Immigrants 23,850 97%
International 786 3%
==
http://www.oid.ucla.edu/publications/teachersguide/policies/universitycontext/index.html
Ethnic minorities constitute over one half of the undergraduate student population. As of Fall 2006, the UCLA undergraduate student body, excluding transfer students, was 44% Asian American, 31% White, 13% Chicano/Latino, 2% African American, less than 1% Native American, 3% International, and 7% Other/Unknown.
==
The Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews is eliminating whites from the universities whites founded. Note the 31 percent number for whites. It was 31.5 percent white at Stanford and 31 percent white at Berkeley. That is before subtracting out Jews. Once that is done one is down to under 20 percent whites, likely 10 percent whites. Harvard was 48 percent white gross minus 31 percent Jewish for 17 percent white net.
The Slicer Coalition is blacks and Hispanics taking off the bottom and Jews and Asians off the top. Jews are left in control by verbal dominance and their networking skills and group cohesion. They bully the others and thus control the coalition. Thus Jews have replaced whites at the elite schools in terms of control. They erase the national pattern of whites and replace it with that of their own. The removal of the cross in the Mojave desert, now on the way out of California for whites, symbolizes this complete erasing of the national pattern of whites.
This is why we have the right to separation from blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews. They are erasing our national pattern. That is generalized genocide. That is followed by imposing their pattern. That is followed by their replacing our genes by their own coalition. That is guaranteed by new immigration according to the Wright Island Model and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.
Discussion in above paragraphs is taken from:
==
Jeffrey Imm partly debates his critics at Hunter Wallace’s Occidental Dissent.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/31/real/
Also see this discussion:
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/the-fbi-and-white-nationalists/
In the above post I link to the former Chief of Counter-intelligence of the US, Joel Brenner who said Russia had cold war levels of activity in the U.S. But the FBI has not brought any cases. Why is the FBI so concerned with White Nationalists? China too is taking our secrets and is actually conducting cyber war against the US military and government as well as private entities. Yet the FBI has to go to a college because of something scrawled in a bathroom. Eric Holder is Attorney General and he said to the DOJ and implicitly the FBI that they were cowards on telling the truth about race. That was in Black History Month 2009. Well, we are speaking up. Nation of Cowards is a whole blog devoted to that.
Bringing people north of Juarez means we can’t go East of Suez. If we want to go East of Suez we have to send the Hispanics back south of Juarez and send the Asians back West of Berkeley.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/feb/02/america-europe
Simon Tisdall
America is broke, and needs its old friends
The US badly needs its European allies to help redress its loss of balance and stem the haemorrhaging of its international clout
…
On present trends, Obama’s America badly needs the allies of “old world” Europe to help redress its loss of balance and stem the haemorrhaging of its international clout. With wolves at the door, the transatlantic relationship, often dismissed as moribund and unimportant under George Bush and Obama, may be coming back into its own.
Obama does not seem to realise this yet, with the state department announcing this week, for example, that the president will not attend a US-EU summit in Spain in May.
Give him time. As the bills pile up and threat levels rise, America may remember who its real friends are.
One more reminder that Obama is not an American. Obama spurns Europe. Obama hates Europe because its white like America, which Obama hates for the same reason. Obama’s real baptism is one of hate in America in Muslim Indonesia. That is why the Founding Fathers required the president be a natural born citizen, born in the US of 2 citizen parents and raised in sole loyalty to the US from time of birth to becoming president. Any lapse disqualifies the person from being Commander in Chief under Article II.
Brenda Walker on Ciudad Juarez, the drain of our pain, if we send them back.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/24/mexicos-image-circling-the-drain/
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/05/25/meltdown-in-ciudad-juarez/
A commenter at Lawrence Auster earlier transcribed a portion of the Sarah Palin peon to immigration on Glenn Beck.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015344.html
Paul K transcribed Sarah Palin on Glenn Beck on immigration
Palin:
Let me address legal immigration. We need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty. The immigrants, of course, built this country, and I think Republicans, conservatives, are at fault when we allow the other side to capture this immigration issue and try to turn this issue into something negative for Republicans. I think we need to recognize that, again, immigrants built this great country. There are rules to follow if you want to be part of this great country–let’s be sure people are following those rules–but let’s welcome this.
This was discussed earlier here:
Allan Wall at Vdare discusses the same portion of the Glenn Beck program.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/02/01/sarah-palin-on-legal-immigration/
Rereading the passage, the following fallacies stand out.
If we follow the same line of loose thinking, consider that immigrants today are tearing down this country. Are the immigrants who tear down the country the same as the ones who built it up? Clearly not. Are they following some rules to be part of this country? Other than the rule of erasing the national pattern of those who came before them?
Immigrants do not have a common identity by being immigrants. Animals and seeds also are immigrants, but that doesn’t make them have a common identity with each other or with us. Invasive species of fish do not have a common identity with each other or with native species.
Those who built the country in the past are the natives today and the immigrants coming here are tearing the country down. The immigrants today are an invasive species. They are erasing the national pattern of the native founding stock Americans. So did the immigrants of the late 19th century and early 20th century.
Emma Goldman came here from Russia and participated in an assassination conspiracy on Frick. That inspired a son of immigrants from Poland to assassinate President McKinley. Were those rules to be followed to be part of this country? Or rules to race replace the people who came before and erase their national pattern? Leon Trotsky came in 1917 and later developed the words racist and racism to race replace Founding Stock Americans, a separate nation of their own.
The assassinations, including Wall Street bombings later, were not building the country up, it was tearing it down. It was an attack on the social fabric. Moreover, they intended it that way. They intended to ethnically cleanse the Wasps and with Trotsky inventing the words racist and racism to race replace whites in general, particularly non-Jewish whites.
Maps of settlement in New England show this pattern, e.g. in Boston and in parts of New York City. Wasps are now almost completely cleansed from New York City, a city they founded and Boston. Non-Jewish whites are 20 percent at Harvard, so Founding Stock Americans are less than that, say 10 percent. That is erasing the national pattern. Founding Stock Americans built Harvard. Now their national pattern is erased by immigrants from Eastern Europe as well as from the 3rd world.
Immigrants have no common identity. No more than all flying things have a common identity or all walking things or all swimming things have a common identity. In each case, they feed on each other. That is not common identity.
Species replace others in the air, land and seas not because they are the same, but because they are different. So it is with immigrants. They replace the gene lineages. They erase the national pattern. They prefer their own as Obama and Sotomayor do.
The one thing that binds the recent immigrants together is hatred of those who have come before them and a determination to erase them from Harvard, Standford, Berkeley and UCLA so that they can erase them from Boston, New York City, Los Angeles and San Francisco-Oakland and vice versa. What unites the immigrants of the recent past and those of the turn of the 19th into the 20th century is a common determination to race replace those who came before them. That is the fundamental rule they have.
Trotsky was just playing race replace the previous immigrants the same thing by inventing racism and racist. Trotsky was just another immigrant to the Americas pursuing race replacement of those who came before his race. Trotsky was just putting his people first like other immigrant cohorts do that are distinct by race from those already here.
Their rule is race replace those here. Their rule is use the resources of society to have a higher birth rate and race replace those here. Their rule is erase the national pattern of those who came here before. Rename the streets. Claim they built America when they didn’t.
Their rules are lie, steal and corrupt. Lie about who built the country. Lie about the uniqueness of the people who built. Lie that its a proposition nation when in fact its not.
Their rules are as follows. Steal the land. Corrupt the government to favor them. Tax and eliminate those who came before them. Those are the rules immigrants who came after the founding of America have played by. Consistently and to the last.
The result is plain in the maps of ethnicity around America and in the proportion of non-Jewish whites at Harvard, Stanford, UCLA and Berkeley. The percentage of FSA’s is even lower, in the 10 percent range at universities their ancestors founded for their posterity, their genetic posterity.
Sarah Palin is playing by their rules.
We need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty
The immigrants reclaimed the Statue of Liberty as theirs. They changed its meaning from a gift from the French people to Founding Stock Americans to them. That’s how immigrant cohorts lie. They claim the Statue of Liberty as a symbol to them when its a symbol of the friendship of the French people and Founding Stock Americans. It was not friendship between the French people and Jews. It was a lie to say it meant 19th century immigrants and not Founding Stock Americans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Lazarus
Lazarus was the fourth of seven children of Moshe Lazarus and Esther Nathan, Portuguese Sephardic Jews[4] whose families had been settled in New York since the colonial period.
She invented the lie that the Statue of Liberty represented late 19th century immigrants and not the Founding Stock Americans. She also showed that despite her lineage being here from the founding, she didn’t identify with Founding Stock Americans but with Jews from Eastern Europe. Those were her people. Those are who she identified with. She invented the lie that the Statue of Liberty symbolized her people and not Founding Stock Americans.
Her lie was a denial about what the Statue of Liberty really represented, the Founding Stock Americans and their alliance with the French people. An alliance is about the two parties to the alliance, not about abstract alliances independent of the parties.
Her denial of which people and which nation the Statue of Liberty represented was part of erasing the national pattern of FSA’s. It was about erasing their nation and what it really was, the creation of a distinct people, and replacing it by her people, her nation, and saying it was about them. It showed that her people, despite living here since the founding, had never identified with the Founding Stock Americans.
Her lie about which people the Statue of Liberty represents is part of the race replacement of Founding Stock Americans by her people. Its the race replacement of one nation by another nation. We see that on the ethnicity maps of New York city and the statistics on students at Harvard and elsewhere.
It is a lie when the 19th century immigrants, the race replacers of FSA’s, say on the Fourth of July that it symbolizes them. They lie on TV. Their politicians lie. Its not about them. Its about Founding Stock Americans. They are race replacing FSA’s as the statisics from Harvard show and as the ethnicity maps of New York City and Boston and coastal New England from Boston to New York City show.
Its a lie when Jews say the Statue of Liberty symbolizes Jews and not Founding Stock Americans. Trotsky came to New York in 1917. As an immigrant to the Americas later he invented the words racist and racism precisely because his fortunes now lay with race replacement of the Wasps who came before the Jews. There is a line that connects Emma Lazarus to Emma Goldman to Leon Trotsky to Emanuel Cellar to Norbert Schlei to Charles Schumer.
The very words racism and racist were invented by Trotksy as words to lie with about race replacement. Denial of ethnic and racial identity is part of the lies of Marxism. That is a war on the people themselves. It is why Marxism has contempt for the petit bourgeois and the working class alike.
Marxism’s contempt and disdain for the middle class and working class turn into hate and are hate. This is the same process we see in Congress where disdain and contempt by Senators and Congressman for voters who vote for them after they vote for race replacement of the voters turns into hate and a physical need in the rulers to harm the ruled. The same pattern played out in Russia under Trotsky and the Bolsheviks. Race replacement in America is the same movement as Bolshevism and has common players like Trotsky.
More on the Statue of Liberty and the lies and tricks of 19th century immigrants to falsely misrepresent its meaning and which people it symbolized.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/statue-of-liberty/
The Statue of Liberty symbolizes the victims of race replacement immigration, the Founding Stock Americans. Hispanics also don’t identify with it the way Jews in New York do. Jews in New York have turned it into their symbol just as they have taken over the city and ethnically cleansed FSA’s from it by using follow on immigration since 1965.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin
That is exactly what is done by saying the Statue of Liberty represents late 19th century immigrants and not FSA’s.
Also see here
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/generalized-genocide/
Liberalism celebrates Greensboro Four
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/02/01/greensboro.four.sitins/
Sit-in vet: ‘Never request permission to start a revolution’
By Matt Cherry and Emanuella Grinberg, CNN
February 1, 2010 — Updated 1612 GMT (0012 HKT)
Guilty verdict and photo of perp and photo of victim:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014748.html
From
‘Never request permission to start a revolution’
to
‘Never request permission to start a rape torture murder’
in two generations.
List of black fake race crime hoaxes
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008983.html
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2009/11/ann-pressly-trial-day-4.html
Here is an account of the fourth day of the trial of Anne Pressly’s killer. Kristen Edwards, who was raped by the defendant a few months earlier, testified.
Nicholas Stix on hate crime bill with mention of Anne Pressly.
http://www.vdare.com/stix/090701_usccr.htm
==Excerpt above
Additionally, the Commission said:
“We regard the broad federalization of crime as a menace to civil liberties….
“While the title of [the Hate Crime bill] suggests that it will apply only to ‘hate crimes,’ the actual criminal prohibitions contained in it do not require that the defendant be inspired by hatred or ill will in order to convict. It is sufficient if he acts ‘because of’ someone’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. Consider:
==end excerpt
http://www.vdare.com/stix/090217_coulter.htm
Nicholas Stix
While reporting interracial murders and attempted murders carried out by black men against white women, I have noted a pattern involving certain aspects of the crime, the official response or lack thereof, and responses by different elements of the public.
The murder typically is extreme in its brutality, with the killer inflicting the maximum in pain and humiliation on his victim. The authorities stonewall the public—unlike their reactions to deaths or assaults committed against blacks by whites, when they strive for a maximum in publicity and transparency. When they do speak, it is often to lie, adamantly denying that the crime was “racially motivated”—even though they have no problem calling (statistically rare) white-on-black murders “racially motivated”—and claiming either that the motive was “robbery” or that they can’t imagine what the motive might have been etc. etc.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media and their blogosphere comrades will mock and denounce any whites who state the obvious as “racists,” “white nationalists,” “Nazis,” etc.
Black-on-white torture murders of females invariably follow the rape and/or sodomy of the victim: The Wichita Massacre; the Knoxville Horror; the Columbia University rape-torture-attempted murder; the Winchester Atrocity (in which the gang-rape victim was the black wife of a white man). The sexual humiliation doubles the murderer’s pleasure.
Liberal lies about race and crime can hurt you.
==Excerpt below from Peter Brimelow on Jared Taylor
http://vdare.com/pb/taylor_review.htm
First published in National Review, January 18, 1993
[Peter Brimelow writes: While I congratulated American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor on his outing Bill Buckley for cowardice on immigration (August 23, 2000), I realized that we hadn’t posted my review of his remarkable book on race relations, Paved With Good Intentions. So here it is. That this book did not transform public debate on the topic is a signal condemnation of American intellectual life. All the major papers refused to review it, the Los Angeles Times saying frankly that it was impossible in the aftermath of the Rodney King riots.
“WAS THE MUGGER black?” asked my wife sympathetically. As a Canadian newly arrived in Manhattan, she honestly didn’t know that you must Never Ask. Her hostess, caught off balance in mid-crime story, admitted that he was. Then she hurriedly covered herself: of course, she said, this meant nothing.
Besides being a Canadian, however, my wife was and still is in some respects invincibly innocent. And now she was really puzzled. “But aren’t most muggers in New York black?” she inquired. Her hostess was outraged. “I don’t believe that,” she snapped.
The single greatest strength of Jared Taylor’s Paved with Good Intentions is its massive and merciless crushing of this type of hysterical denial, which currently paralyzes all discussion of race relations in America.
==End excerpt
Now back to celebrating the Greensboro boys breaking down the protections that whites in the South had erected by a painful struggle for their civil rights after the unCivil War. The White Civil Rights movement under occupation is the greatest civil rights story never told. That is the one true great civil rights movement in American history. That is the real civil rights story we must learn from. That is the civil rights story we must apply the lessons of.
