“Reader! Whoever thou art, remember this…’” Call Your Senator No Amnesty

Reader! Whoever thou art, remember this…’

from Vanishing American (with apologies for liberties taken).

“Before this day is gone,” Call your Senator, read our lips, no new amnesties.

“I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past.”

The 1986 Amnesty Act didn’t work and brought in more. Steve Sailer points out it led to Hispanic men bringing in women and a baby bubble that fed the LA Gang Bubble that started in the 1990’s and that now has blacks on Greenlight in LA as SPLC tells us, apparently without plagiarizing Colorado Media Matters for once.

Steve Sailer:

 

Demographers Laura E. Hill and Hans P. Johnson of the Public Policy Institute of California wrote in 2002:

“Between 1987 and 1991, total fertility rates for foreign-born Hispanics [in California] increased from 3.2 to 4.4 [expected babies per woman over her lifetime]. (“Understanding the Future of Californians’ Fertility: The Role of Immigrants”).

Today, California’s amnesty baby boom generation is between ages 10 and 19, entering their prime gang violence years.

== End Sailor Quotes

== SPLC’s own (non-plagiarized from CMM) material on LA gang warfare:

Gauging the Gangs
A respected writer spent five years studying the Mexican Mafia. What he discovered will shock even the most seasoned cop.
interview by Brentin Mock

SPLC does a much better job when they give credit where its due instead of skimming the work of others without citation.

== Back to Vanishing American

“Henry’s best known speech, from March 1775, just before armed clashes broke out between the British and the colonists, contains the immortal phrase, ‘give me liberty from amnesty, or give me death.” :”

The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the South will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms (or is it a giant sucking sound of our ER’s being taken from us)…Let it come. I repeat, Sir, Let it come…Is grass so long, or house work so bleak, as to be purchased at the price of the blood stains of the Virginia Beach Teens Allison Kunhardt and Tessa Tranchant? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me Liberty from Amnesty or give me my Senator’s stock portfolio!´´

Another quote:

…Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power, the telephone, fax machine, email, letters and office visits to our Senators. Three millions of people at Numbers USA and Fairus, armed in the Holy cause of Liberty from Amnesty, and in such a country as that which we possess, for the moment, are invincible by any force which our McKennedy enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up Virginia Dare friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave, the diligent telephone caller…”

If we admit this comprehensive amnesty of consolidated government, it will be because we like an end to what began so splendidly. Some way or other Kennedy and McCain must have a great and mighty stock portfolio; these Senators must have a ranch, a town house in DC, Georgetown, of course, one in Boston on Beacon Hill, a summer place at Chappaquiddick, and a number of servants and other things. When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, Sir, was then the primary object…But now, Sir, the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of amnesty, guest worker and legal immigration, is about to convert this country to a powerful and mighty Bush Rove McSlave Galley.”

“It’s a little-known fact that Henry left a message for posterity, to be read after his death:”

Near his last will, Patrick Henry left a small envelope sealed with wax. Inside was a single sheet of paper on which he had copied his Resolutions against the Amnesty Stamp Act. On the back, Patrick Henry left a message that he knew could only be read after his death, but not America’s he hoped. It began with a short history of his Resolutions against the Amnesty Z-Stamp Act, which had “spread throughout America with astonishing Quickness.” (by bloggers and not the MSM) As a result, the colonies were united in their “Resistance to Mexican Taxation by Immigration,” and won “the War which finally separated the two Countries and gave Independence to ours.”

Whether America’s independence “will prove a Blessing or a Curse,” Henry continued in his message to posterity, “will depend on the Use our people make of the Blessings which a gracious God hath bestowed on us. If they are wise, they will be great and happy. If they are of a contrary Character, they will be miserable under Political Correctness and a witness to their own omnia cleansing. Righteousness alone can exalt them as a Nation. Reader! whoever thou art, remember this, and in thy Sphere, practice Virtue thyself, –Call Your Senator– and encourage it in others. P. HENRY”

Its a little known fact that Henry had two middle initials, L.D., thought by some to be Lou Dobbs, from which initials he coined his famous phrase, “Give me Liberty or give me credit card Debt.” (Which your Senator owns through his stocks and gets your 18 percent on) by which he also meant, “Give me Liberty from working for Men’s Median Wages in 1973 forever, unless I fall into some other group that makes even less like women, Hispanics, blacks, Native Americans and many others.”

I ask Vanishing American’s pardon for reusing so much of his quotes and post, but I had a double espresso this afternoon. See his post for Patrick Henry in the original and the citations to his sources and forgive this Poor Richard’s use of his words, by which I am reminded: Early to Bed and Early to Rise helps you call your Senator against this Amnesty Act and will mean one day you and your descendant’s wages will rise above men’s median wages in 1973 (graph page 1 . And remember also that sage advice from Polonius, neither a borrower nor amnestier be, for amnesty doth lose both itself and votes.

NYT CBS Poll Q74: 69% Prosecute & Deport

In Question 74 of the New York Times CBS Poll, 69 percent of what were judged usable respondents said that illegals should be prosecuted and deported. This is reported in their lengthy pdf file available here.

74. Should illegal immigrants be prosecuted and deported for being in the U.S. illegally, or shouldn’t they?

• Should be prosecuted 69
• Should not 24
• DK/NA 6

5/18-23/07

Immigration Bill Provisions Gain Wide Support in Poll
By JULIA PRESTON and MARJORIE CONNELLY
Published: May 25, 2007
A careful analysis of the pdf and its inconsistencies is reported on at Times Watch:

The Poll’s Goals
“The New York Times reports its own poll on immigration, complete with slanted questions and a slanted cherry-picking of the answers.” Posted by: Tim Graham 5/25/2007 3:33:00 PM. Graham points out the inconsistency of the answers for Q74, not mentioned in NYT article, and other questions highlighted in the NYT article.

The NYT and its pdf give no information on how many people were contacted initially to come up with the final list of usable responses. Many of the questions are not reported even in the pdf.

Q74 is almost at the end of the NYT survey. This is after all the positive information on the bill has been given as part of or before other questions. At this point, the pollster can’t drop the person without losing all the time spent on the previous, apparently, 73 questions. A cynic might infer that the NYT poll couldn’t disqualify people for answering yes to Q74 without losing the answers they wanted for the other questions?
In some cases, the NYT CBS poll gave people information and then asked them questions in light of that information. This information was only positive for the bill? So it appeared to this reader.

What about giving information about jobs. Consider the following potential questions based on information provided.

Info provided:

The census, an office of the US government, reports that the median wages of men have been the same since 1973, see graph page 18. The increase in legal and illegal immigration started in 1965.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports (in an Excel spreadsheet) that since1965 the labor force participation rates of white men fell from 80 percent to 75 percent and black men from 80 percent, about the same as whites to 66 percent.

NYT CBS style Questions following this fact:

Do you think immigration is why 75 percent of white men and 66 percent of black men still have jobs?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

Do we need more immigration so that white and black men can keep the jobs they still have?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

Do you believe that median wages for men would be substantially lower except for the positive benefits of immigration on wages?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

Do you think that the only thing that can keep wages of men from going down is more immigration?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

Why do you think that 80 percent of black men had jobs in 1965, but only 66 percent do now?

1. Bigotry
2. Republican bigotry
3. Racism
4. Secret plan by Trent Lott and Strom Thurmond
5. Don’t know

Black wages are still below white wages.

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/p53b.html

black white median wage graphs

How many immigrants will it take to get black wages to converge to white wages?

1. 1 million per year
2. 2 million per year
3. 3 million per year
4. 4 million per year.
5. All of the above.

Why have the wages of women stayed below those of men?

1. Men are pigs
2. Employers are pigs
3. Secret plan by jocks who resent male teams being cut to comply with federal regs
4. Not enough immigrants.

Why did Black wages converge towards white wages before the 1965 Immigration Act but stop afterwards?

1. Klan was strong before 1965.
2. Public interest law firms can use 1964 Civil Rights Act to control principals and teachers.
3. Lack of multicultural education curriculum materials before 1965.
4. Blacks got poor education before 1964 in schools to keep their wages down.
5. Not enough immigrants.

The census graph shows that women’s wages still don’t match men’s, see graph page 18.

What will it take for women’s wages to converge to men’s?

1. 1 million immigrants per year.
2. 2 million immigrants per year.
3. We need employers to determine the answer and tell us.
4. Matching every willing immigrant to a willing employer.

A Canadian Harvard study shows that wages in Canada and the US are depressed by immigration. (See Patrick Cleburne at Vdare on this study.)

After hearing about this study do you think:

1. Canada needs more immigration to undepress these wages.
2. America needs more immigration to undepress wages.
3. America and Canada are the problem: Mexico is the solution.
4. Don’t know, Don’t care, bigot or otherwise unusable response.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that black men, white men, Hispanic men and Asian men will all have lower labor force participation rates in 2014 compared to 2004. This was before the 2006 and 2007 Bush McCain Kennedy Kyl amnesty plans.

Do we need more immigration to prevent this?

1. Yes.
2. No, but count it as yes anyhow.

–Information for next question

The top 1 percent got 20 percent of income before income restriction in the 1920’s, 10 percent and heading lower before the 1965 Immigration Act (legal immigration), and are now back up to 20 percent and headed higher.

Income Inequality U Shape Timeline

Would income inequality have been even lower in the 1950’s if there had been immigration at the bottom of the U?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

Is the only thing that is keeping income inequality from being higher today the high influx of poor people whose great number averages out with that of the rich to keep income inequality down?

1. Yes.
2. No, I went to school before they fell apart, but I’m sure if I went to them today I would answer yes.

If there are enough poor people, who are all equally poor, it doesn’t matter if there are a few rich people. Its just envy of the rich to disagree with this outcome, and bigotry of the middle class towards the poor to try to keep them out?

1. Yes.
2. I think I heard a luncheon speaker say this, it must be true.

–Next Question

7 of the top 8 wealthiest Senators voted for S. 2611, amnesty, affirmative action, non-deportable crime, and a pathway for the top 1 percent of households to continue to enjoy 20 percent of each year’s income, compared to 10 percent before Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. The only 1 of the top 8 who didn’t vote for S. 2611 didn’t vote, Jay Rockefeller. McCain is 7th and Kennedy 8th in wealth.

Worker Productivity Graph has gone up since 1973

Even though men and women’s median wages are the same or lower than men’s were in 1973 (graph page 18).

Open Secrets wealth of senators in 2005

2006 Amnesty Bill S 2611 Roll Call at senate.gov

Is it possible for us to pay our Senators enough for what they do for us?

1. No.
2. Yes, but count it as no anyhow. (We will.)

–Information Next Question

“Numbers Drop for the Married With Children
Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent”

By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03

PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.

The first census was in 1790. The census is reporting the unhelpful information that men’s median wages are the same since 1973, (graph page 18) and that women’s wages today, and blacks are lower than all men’s wages were in 1973.

How can we teach the census to do better work?

1. Get them to drop respondents who have the wrong answers.
2. Tell people with the wrong answers they are bigots.
3. Exclude blacks, whites, men, women, Hispanics, and Asians, unless they get speaking fees of $50,000 per lunch.
4. Find one lesbian Hispanic immigrant female who makes more than the median wage of men in 1973 and put her picture on census.gov in place of all these pdf’s full of wrong graphs (page 18).
5. If we had called Pat Buchanan a bigot one more time, we wouldn’t have these problems.
6. Restrict census data to the S & P 500.

What do you think of this poll?

1. More immigrants are the answer.
2. Invalid response.
3. Don’t know.
4. Survey respondent disqualified.
5. Spoiled survey ballot.
6. My chad is hanging.
7. Do pollsters get speaking fees?

Media pundits are paid $50,000 or more to speak at corporate lunches and ride corporate jets to and from them.

1. More immigrants are the answer.
2. Is this a question?
3. A prayer?
4. More immigrants are the answer.
5. Final Jeapardy, What is the reason the pundits support immigration?

==Appendix: others commenting on this poll.

Scott Rasmussen

“NY Times/CBS Poll Finds that 69% Believe Illegal Immigrants Should Be Prosecuted“

“Just 26% Favor Senate Immigration Plan“

Which Poll is Right on Immigration?

Posted by: Michael Medved at 10:29 PMMedved slams Rasmussen for not push polling for immigration. Instead Rasmussen just asks if they support the bill without giving them any information.

Lawrence Auster

“Do two-thirds of the American people really support legalization? “

“65 percent of Muslims seek strict application of sharia law”

Here are two data that blow out of the water the idea that most Muslims are “moderates,” i.e., that most Muslims believe in Islam only as an individual religion, not as a political religion. Andrew Bostom writes:

Polling data just released (April 24, 2007) in a rigorously conducted face-to-face University of Maryland/ WorldPublicOpinion.org interview survey of 4384 Muslims conducted between December 9, 2006 and February 15, 2007–1000 Moroccans, 1000 Egyptians, 1243 Pakistanis, and 1141 Indonesians–reveal that 65.2% of those interviewed–almost 2/3, hardly a “fringe minority”–desired this outcome (i.e., “To unify all Islamic countries into a single Islamic state or Caliphate”), including 49% of “moderate” Indonesian Muslims. The internal validity of these data about the present longing for a Caliphate is strongly suggested by a concordant result: 65.5% of this Muslim sample approved the proposition “To require a strict [emphasis added] application of Shari’a law in every Islamic country.”

Amren: “NY Times/CBS Poll Finds That 69% Believe Illegal Immigrants Should Be Prosecuted“

Vdare:

Immigration Restrictionists Dominate Slashdot Poll

Steve Sailer on “pollaganda”

http://www.cnn.com/2006/images/06/21/lou.dobbs.tonight.poll.results.pdf

Google News: immigration poll

poll site:numbersusa.com

http://www.numbersusa.com/search/?action=showresults&start=0&All=poll&searchType=www.numbersusa.com&Phrase=&Any=&None=&Submit=Search

Stein Report on NYT CBS poll:

http://www.steinreport.com/archives/010394.html

CIS executive director Mark Krikorian critiques poll at NRO. This is particularly informative and short.

Poll: Public Wants Illegals to Go Home
Public Prefers Enforcement, Not Senate Legalization Approach

http://www.eagleforum.org/alert/2007/05-22-07.html

poll site:fairus.org

poll site:vdare.com

The poll that counts: Call your Senators. Scroll down for lists of numbers to call, stop immigration free fax services, etc from Frosty Wooldridge:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty260.htm

Insightful comments on current and past polls related to immigration at Vanishing American.

immigration poll site:VanishingAmerican.blogspot.com

Worse, the more information the pollsters give those questioned — about current levels of immigration, alternative policies, fiscal costs — the more strongly they oppose the legislation. So you need to get hurry this bill through the entire legislative process before Americans learn what’s in it.

From:

The group portrait of British Muslims painted by YouGov’s survey for The Daily Telegraph is at once reassuring and disturbing, in some ways even alarming. http://www.steinreport.com/archives/010384.html#comments http://www.eontarionow.com/international/2007/05/23/user-comments-on-pew-research-centers-survey-of-us-muslims/ http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/pew_propaganda_spin.html May 23, 2007 Pew propaganda spin Richard Baehr Are Muslim Americans mostly middle class and mostly mainstream, as headlined by the Pew Research Center? Is there any other group which would be surveyed for which the labels “moderate” and “assimilated” would be used when more than one quarter of those under age 30 support suicide bombing attacks, and only 40% believe that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by Muslim terrorists? Cheerleaders for Pew: Tom Regan The Real Picture on Muslim Americans = .Survey: U.S. Muslims Assimilated, Opposed to Extremism. By Alan Cooperman Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, May 23, 2007; Page A03 “Though socially conservative, Muslims lean toward the Democratic Party, six to one.” “One of the poll’s most striking findings, Kohut said, is that African American Muslims are considerably more likely than immigrant Muslims to express support for al-Qaeda.” Comments OldAtlantic wrote: Will SPLC go on Lou Dobbs to point out the flaws in the Pew Poll conclusions? In particular, will Richard Cohen and Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center go on Lou Dobbs to correct the flawed conclusions of the Pew poll? They are good guys, they will want to correct this. ==Pew Puzzles Pew polls tend to be puzzles.   Their study on immigration and wages in 2006 was a similar puzzle set to the public.  They explicitly said they were not determining if immigration lowered wages overall in the US, just that where immigration was high didn’t result in lower wages there, according to their study.  Even if we accepted that result, we would still have the issue that the impact on wages was felt everywhere, which would explain why there is opposition to immigration everywhere.   Even if immigration impacted the place of immigration first, immigration started in 1965 so there has been plenty of time for the effects to spread out evenly over the whole country. V2: Ted the magic driver with a plan called amnesty May 22, 2007 Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a lamb called Kopechne, Little Georgie Junior loved that rascal Ted, And brought him strings and sealing wax and other fancy treads. oh Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a plan called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a lamb called Kopechne. Together they would travel on a boat with billowed sail Georgie kept a lookout perched on Ted’s gigantic tail, Noble kings and emirs would bow whene’er they came, Pirate ships would lower their flag when Ted roared out Jo’s name. oh! Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a plan called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a lamb called Kopechne. A drowner lives forever but not so little girls Painted wings and giant rings make way for other swirls. One grey night it happened, Mary’s vapor came no more And Ted that mighty driver, he ceased his fearless roar. His head was bent in sorrow, green tales fell like rain, Ted no longer went to play along the Chappie lane. Without his little girl friend, Ted could not be brave, So Ted that mighty driver sadly slipped into his cave. oh! Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist with a plan called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty. ==Note This is modified from version 1. ==Keywords Mary Jo Kopechne Edward M. Kennedy Teddy Kennedy Chappaquiddick George Bush Junior Bush Kennedy McCain Senate Amnesty John McCain http://www.ytedk.com/ Peter, Paul & Mary, Puff, the Magic Dragon Formatted lyrics “puff the magic dragon” Ted the magic driver with a plan called amnesty May 21, 2007 Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty, Little Georgie Junior loved that rascal Ted, And brought him strings and sealing wax and other fancy treads. oh Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty. Together they would travel on a boat with billowed sail Georgie kept a lookout perched on Ted’s gigantic tail, Noble kings and emirs would bow wheneer they came, Pirate ships would lower their flag when Ted roared out his name. oh! Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty. A drowner lives forever but not so little girls Painted wings and giant rings make way for other swirls. One grey night it happened, Mary’s vapor came no more And Ted that mighty driver, he ceased his fearless roar. His head was bent in sorrow, green tales fell like rain, Ted no longer went to play along the Chappie lane. Without his little girl friend, Ted could not be brave, So Ted that mighty driver sadly slipped into his cave. oh! Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty, Ted, the magic driver lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called amnesty. ==Keywords Mary Jo Kopechne Edward M. Kennedy Teddy Kennedy Chappaquiddick George Bush Junior Bush Kennedy McCain Senate Amnesty John McCain http://www.ytedk.com/ Peter, Paul & Mary, Puff, the Magic Dragon Formatted lyrics “puff the magic dragon” Kennedy Leftist Awakening: Irreversible Change by Immigration May 21, 2007 The 1920’s and 1960’s were worldwide leftist awakenings that wanted irreversible change. Teddy Kennedy is a leader in the Leftist Awakening of the 1960’s. The 1920’s leftist awakening used ethnic, religious, class, and troublemaker cleansings in many countries to eliminate the physical embodiment of the culture they wished to destroy. The 1960’s Left uses immigration to irreversibly destroy the physical embodiment of the culture it proclaims it wants to destroy. In China and Cuba, and some other countries, the 1960’s Leftist awakening used the same ethnic, religious, class, and troublemaker cleansings as the 1920’s leftist awakenings did. In the 17th century, the Puritan revolution was followed by the restoration which undid the extreme parts of the Puritan revolution. The French Revolution aimed for irreversible change. Their method was the terror, i.e. kill the physical embodiment of the culture of the ancien regime. A revolution to replace a king kills the king. A revolution to change a society has to kill the group or groups that embody the culture of the old society. Leftist Awakenings call themselves culture wars. Leftist Awakenings use some form of cleansings to eliminate the physical embodiment of the previous culture so that it can’t be restored. The Leftist Awakenings of the French Revolution, Nazi, Stalin, Mao, and 1960’s revolutions in the West and world wide all tried to eliminate the physical embodiment of the previous culture. Each of these Leftist Awakenings targeted the people or groups they thought were a threat to restore the previous culture in a Glorious Restoration. These can be the nobility, professors, priests, Jews, kulaks, capitalists, merchants, or Archie Bunker. The French Revolution had the “The Terror”. The Russian Revolution had the “Red Terror”, the Nazi Revolution had “The Holocaust” and killed not just 6 million Jews, who embodied the old culture, but also millions of others. The Mao Revolution had the “Cultural Revolution”. These were all Leftist Awakenings. The 1960’s Awakening is also a self-proclaimed Culture War. It targets the Archie Bunkers. It uses ethnic cleansing by immigration. It demonizes Bunker for speaking out. It demonizes Lou Dobbs as the Nightly Nativist. Immigration causes ethnic cleansing. If US population is 300 million and stable, then if people live 75 years 4 million die per year. If 2 million enter, then in a steady state, births equal 4 million deaths - 2 million entrants = 2 million. Births over deaths is 2 million/ 4 million. That is a genetic survival ratio per generation of 1/2. It is 25 years from birth to parent. In 2 cycles, the genes left are 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4. In 3 cycles its 1/8. So in 75 years only 1/8 of the starting genes are left. That is ethnic cleansing. That is irreversible change. That is eliminating the physical embodiment of the old culture. If population goes to 450 million, and entrants are 1 million, then 6 million die per year, so births are 5 million. We then have a per generation survival ratio of genes of 5/6. This then goes like 25/36, 125/216, 625/1296, 3125/7776, … In this Leftist Awakening, they use immigration to reduce the birth rate below replacement of the physical embodiment of the West. Its working. “Numbers Drop for the Married With Children Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent By Blaine Harden Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03 PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.” The first ever census is 1790. This is irreversible change by eliminating the physical embodiment of the old culture. Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973. See p60-231.pdf. Immigrants take away job security and that causes young adults to not marry, have children, stay married, and have more children. In All in the Family, the Left shows Archie Bunker with one child and one grandchild. This is how the Left ethnically cleanses their victim, Archie Bunker. Bunker is a nativist. Bunker is a bigot. Bunker must be cleansed. He is cleansed by keeping him to 1 child and 1 grandchild. His son-in-law has to live at home and has only one child. The Left uses immigration to keep down men’s wages. That keeps the number of babies below replacement. That ethnically cleanses out the physical embodiment of the old culture, Archie Bunker. Immigration is the Terror of the 1960’s Awakening. Call your Senator today. They vote on cloture tonight, tell your Senator vote no on cloture. That means they can’t move to the next step. == This post was also a comment at Front Page Magazine http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/index.asp?ID=28306 Title: Osher right: Noam Chomsky Leftist Awakening - Old Atlantic 5/21/2007 9:08:16 AM Lead in there to comment on: Causing Versus Defusing Rebellion - Osher Doctorow Ph.D. 5/21/2007 3:55:22 AM Great comments by Osher on Chomsky. Noam Chomsky was and is a leader in what might be called a Leftist Awakening. ==Patrick Cleburne on Steven M. Warshawsky Good thinking from “American Thinker” From a quality point of view, I do not think Steven M. Warshawsky’s posting yesterday on the American Thinker web site can really be bettered: Out-of-control immigration represents the greatest existential challenge of our time. By “existential challenge,” I mean a public policy problem that goes to the heart of what it means to be “American” and which threatens to fundamentally, and perhaps permanently, alter American society for the worse. (The Kennedy-Bush Immigration Travesty May 20 2007) ==The French Revolution and income inequality appears in an article today linked to by Vdare today. Immigration And Class Warfare Martin Hutchinson, who did an article for us once, has a Bears Lair column on immigration and it’s effect on the relatively classless society that has evolved in the US. [The end of the classless society, PrudentBear.com, May 21, 2007] ==Lawrence Auster has been using the idea of the Eloi and our inability to call our Senators to stop immigration and vote for candidates against immigration like Tancredo Eloi site:amnation.com search Eloi Morlocks immigration ==Lawrence Auster on their desire for irreversible change http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/007837.html For its supporters, this bill is the decisive act in that endeavor, breaking the old America in such a way that it will lose all power of resistance. That’s why they engage in any lie, any fraud, any violation of the normal deliberative process, in order to push the bill through. They are playing for keeps. Auster has been a leader in pointing this out. For Senator Lindsey Graham, its saying, “God, let’s see if you can fix what I break.” == Kennedy profits from his cleansing of us. The top 1 percent get 20 percent of national income now, 10 percent during immigration restriction, and got 20 percent before immigration restriction. http://www.cbpp.org/7-10-06inc.htm Ed Rubenstein at Vdare has commented on this U shaped pattern: “u shaped” site:vdare.com http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm Men’s median wages are flat since 1973. http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p60-231.pdf productivity and stock prices go up together, with the productivity of workers going largely into stock prices instead of median wages. http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2005/08/the_underreport.html == Open Secrets Rank Name Minimum Net Worth Maximum Net Worth 1 Herb Kohl (D-Wis) $219,098,029 to $234,549,004 Voted Yes S. 2611 2 John Kerry (D-Mass) $165,741,511 to $235,262,100 Voted Yes S. 2611 3 Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa) $78,150,023 to $101,579,003 Not Voting S. 2611 4 Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) $43,343,464 to $98,660,021 Voted Yes S. 2611 5 Lincoln D. Chafee (R-RI) $41,153,105 to $64,096,019 Voted Yes S. 2611 6 Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) $38,198,170 to $90,733,019 Voted Yes S. 2611 7 John McCain (R-Ariz) $25,071,142 to $38,043,014 Voted Yes S. 2611 8 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $19,189,049 to $93,043,004 Voted Yes S. 2611 Kennedy and McCain know immigration math. Median wages flat since 1973, productivity up, profits up, stock prices up. McCain: http://www.steinreport.com/archives/010372.html#comments “McCain: [Expletive] you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room” lets wordsmith this: “McCain: [Expletive] you! Morloch Senators like myself, Teddy Kennedy, and Lindsey Graham know more about this than any Eloi in the room” == Paul Nachman at Vdare says call your Senator today. http://www.vdare.com/nachman/070520_sellout.htm Postscript: OK, you want to know what I do, besides writing occasional pieces, gratis, [VDARE.COM note: we’ve tried to pay him!] for VDARE.COM? Last year I donated more than $11,000 (tax deductible) to the various organizations fighting for us and more than $5,000 (non-deductible) to political candidates who were focusing on immigration sanity. I’m on track for similar levels in 2007. No, I’m not rich, and I content myself with driving a trashed-out 1984 Mazda truck. This year I’ve made half a dozen 200-mile round trips to Helena to testify on Montana bills aimed at combating illegal immigration. Since the start of 2006, I’ve submitted about 85 letters to newspapers (with about 25 published), ghostwritten several published op-eds and letters, and had two op-eds published under my own name. I also send every NumbersUSA fax (n.b. after customizing them) and make most of the requested phone calls—the latter being a distinctly non-favorite activity. == I called Jim Webb’s Senate office http://webb.senate.gov/ and said to vote against the amnesty guest worker bill and uphold his promise to vote against guest workers. Call now Phone: (202) 224-4024 Fax: 202-228-6363. You can call the district offices if the main number is busy. Senator John Warner’s number was busy two times. http://www.senate.gov/~warner/ http://www.senate.gov/~warner/contact/offices.htm I called Warner’s main number again and it was busy around noon. Then I called a district office and got through. My message for the Senator was I was against amnesty and to vote no on cloture. Call now. Whenever you read this, call. I also tried calling the White House and the RNC. The White House just rang. The RNC I left a voice mail against amnesty. RNC 202.863.8500 https://www.gop.com/Secure/Splash.aspx White House Comment Line: (202) 456-1414 I tried to leave a message but it just rang and rang. ==Call Your state party GOP http://www.gop.com/States/StateDetails.aspx?state=VA Tell them you want no amnesty, no guest worker and no legal immigration until women, Hispanic and black median wages catch up with all men’s median wages. If they’ll listen also say you want all men, black, white, Asian and Hispanic men’s labor participation rates to get back to the 80 percent in 1965 before we have any more immigration. The misery index for a society is not the unemployment rate its 100 minus the male labor participation rate. Our society has a misery index that is running a huge fever. == Senator Jim Webb and Senator John Warner both voted aye on cloture.  Cloture meant to stop debate on the motion to allow the bill to come to the floor. This advanced the bill. Jim Webb promised to vote against guest worker. This bill has 400,000 guest workers with an adjustable cap. Both have supported this guest worker and amnesty bill that is harming Virginia. These are not the views of their constituents. Warner is the 21st wealthiest Senator as of 2005. Immigration keeps men’s median wages to the 1973 level and all others below that, women, black men, Hispanic men, etc. These Senators voted for their personal stock portfolios against the median wages of their constituents. Webb’s pledge to vote against guest workers was not upheld by his vote on Monday May 21, 2007. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:s.01348: == http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/21/senate-votes-for-cloture-on-amnesty-bill-69-23/ == http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1348 == “This Is the Year”Don’t expect Pelosi to kill semi-amnesty. By Mickey Kaus Updated Monday, May 21, 2007, at 5:57 PM ET P.P.S.: Will backers of “comprehensive” immigration reform continue to tout approving poll numbers from polls that specifically cited the now-defunct “back taxes” requirement before asking voters for their opinion about semi-amnesty? The CNN poll of May 4, 2007, for example, got a large favorable response when it asked if people favored “Creating a program that would allow illegal immigrants already living in the United States for a number of years to stay in this country and apply for U.S. citizenship if they had a job and paid back taxes.” [E.A.] I wonder what the response would be to a query about favoring “Creating a program that would allow illegal immigrants already living in the United States for a number of years to stay in this country and apply for U.S. citizenship even if they don’t pay back taxes.” http://www.pollingreport.com/immigration.htm ==What Republican candidates for President should say: No amnesty and pause all legal immigration including student visas until Median wages of blacks, Hispanics, and women catch up with those of all men. Labor force participation rates of black, Hispanic, Asian, and white men return to the 80 percent level before Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. Labor force participation rates including for men and women by ethnic group, black, Hispanic, Asian and white at BLS: www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2006/B40.xls (You can download an excel viewer) http://www.bls.gov/emp/emplab05.htm All 4 groups of men are projected to decline in labor force participation rates from 2004 to 2014 by the BLS because of immigration and illegals staying, one way or another. Men’s and women’s median wages graph page 18: http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p60-231.pdf Note that men’s median wages are flat since 1973. Bloomberg is considering running, presumably to guarantee that men’s median wages stay at the 1973 level by continued immigration and that stock prices continue their rise from the impact of legal immigration since the 1965 Immigration Act. == The way to acknowledge Nachman’s Contribution is to call your Senators today. Bush Kennedy Senate Amnesty Draft Text links May 20, 2007 The “Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007” in draft is available from the Truth Laid Bear: http://truthlaidbear.com/immigrationbill0518.php?page=281 Explanation of pdf available Friday May 18, 2007 “you can download here” at National Review Online == This should be distinguished from: S.1348 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 (Placed on Calendar in Senate) Beginning May 9, 2007 == See Hugh Hewitt:Sunday, May 20, 2007Summary Of The Fine Print Read, And NZ’s Easy To Use Text Posted by Hugh Hewitt | 4:02 PM == It is time for conservatives to stand athwart Teddy Kennedy yelling stop. http://www.townhall.com/blog/g/9b490f9b-a270-4da6-8770-63eb3931d9a8 == Bush Senate Z-Visas Allow Family Reunify No Touchback May 19, 2007 The Z-visa has 3 categories. The Z-1 is for anyone in the US illegally up to Jan 1, 2007. http://truthlaidbear.com/immigrationbill0518.php?page=260 (b) Definition of Z nonimmigrants- Section 101(a)(15) of the Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) is amended by inserting at the end the following new subparagraph14 “(Z) subject to Title VI of the [Insert title of Act], an alien who- “(i) is physically present in the United States, has maintained continuous physical presence in the United States since January 1, 2007, is employed, and seeks to continue performing labor, services or education; or “(ii) is physically present in the United States, has maintained continuous physical presence in the United States since January 1, 2007, and “(I) is the spouse or parent (65 years of age or older) of an alien described in (i); or “(II) was, within two years of the date on which [NAME OF THIS ACT] was introduced, the spouse of an alien who was subsequently classified as a Z nonimmigrant under this section, or is eligible for such classification, if- “(aa) the termination of the relationship with such spouse was connected to domestic violence; and “(bb) the spouse has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by the spouse or parent who is a Z nonimmigrant. == Based on the above, it appears that the Z-2 and Z-3 must have been in the US on Jan 1, 2007 and stayed here since then. ==Following was an earlier draft and now appears to be incorrrect. Z-1 Visa holders can bring in their family on Z-2 and Z-3 visas. This requires no touchback by the Z-1 Visa holder. When they tout the Z-visa as ending family reunification, they just mean you can’t bring in your adult brother or sister directly. But you can bring in your parent on a Z-2 and they can bring in their children on a Z-3, and your parents children often turn out to be your brothers and sisters. They say it ends chain migration. But as the above shows, it only makes it a little harder. Under current law, arranged marriage counts as family reunification. Under this law, you can likely have an arranged marriage, usually into Pakistan or Afghanistan, and that will still count. These arranged marriages are where the spouses have never met, but are married, the visas arranged, and they meet under the family reunification program for the very first time. The Y Visa “temporary guest worker program” is what requires the touchback. The Z-visa does not. GOP Sellout A senseless giveaway on immigration. By Brian Darling Title VI of a draft copy of the bill breaks down amnesty visas into three categories:   Z-1 — Illegal aliens present and working in the United States up to Jan. 1, 2007. Z-2 — Parents and spouses of illegal aliens qualifying under the Z-1 category. Z-3 — Children of illegal aliens qualifying under the Z-1 category.These “Z Visa” holders can stay in the “Z” status indefinitely, which means they never have to pursue “a pathway to citizenship.” They also would be able to get Social Security numbers and benefit from some welfare programs. Shockingly, there is no cap on the numbers of amnesty recipients in the draft language. The only thing the Z Visa holder can’t do is vote — until, that is, a liberal judge declares this limitation unconstitutional or until a liberal president can railroad through a “technical corrections” bill. White House disputes above, but not with same level of technical detail and doesn’t mention Z-2 visa, or Z-3 visa, just Z visa. http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/immigration/ FACT: Workers approved for Z visas will be given a temporary legal status, but they will not enjoy the full privileges of citizens or Legal Permanent Residents, such as welfare benefits and the ability to sponsor relatives abroad as immigrants. This gives a conflict with the other source above. Below is a reference to info from the White House March 30, 2007 proposal. That also has the language: “6- A Z visa holder cannot offer derivative status to family members who are abroad.” ImmigrateUSA Written by David Hart Friday, 30 March 200 The White House may be going by this March 30, 2007 summary instead of what came out of Kennedy’s plan. When the White House Summary was posted, the bill had not been finished. It may be that there are different drafts floating around or that the White House just reverted back to its earlier talking points. Its FAQ type format document may have been written in March or April 2007. Six Senators say wait for the draft to be available on the internet. http://www.redstate.com/files/051607Immigration.pdf Teddy Kennedy gave La Raza (”The Race”) and other special interest groups veto authority over the Senate compromise with “Republicans” led by Senator John Kyl. ==American Immigration Lawyers Association, AILA says there is a Z-2, Z-3 http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=1019%7C6712%7C8844%7C22365 Summary of Senate “Grand Bargain” Cite as “AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07051768 (posted May. 17, 2007)” Title VI This title provides a new visa for most individuals currently living within the U.S. illegally. Creates a new four-year, renewable “Z” nonimmigrant visa to address the undocumented population within the U.S. The visa is split up into three groups: a principal or employed alien (Z-1), the spouse or elderly parent of that alien (Z-2), and the minor children of that alien (Z-3). Probationary, the Permanent Z Status: Once an applicant submits a completed application, fingerprints, and is cleared by one-day background checks he will receive probationary benefits which can eventually be converted to a Z nonimmigrant status after all background checks are clear and the triggers set forth in Title I are achieved. It may be the White H