Archive for November, 2007

Turning off Sunday Talk Shows

November 25, 2007

Another Sunday, another set of meaningless discussions on Sunday talk shows in the U.S. The one exception was Chris Wallace taking on Fred Thompson and losing. Fred handled Fox. If Fred can handle Fox, then he can handle Pakistan’s Nukes and Mexican Immigration? It seems like he is the best choice of the establishment candidates.

As to the press, they can collect another week’s pay for keeping immigration from being talked about in any serious way, except for Fred bringing up that even National Review admitted he had the most serious plan for dealing with immigration. Like white nationalism, you can talk about the positives of Fred without being a Fredhead.

Matt Taibbi on Mike Huckabee

November 25, 2007

http://alternet.org/story/68057/?page=1

“Mike Huckabee Is Not a Sane Man”
By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted November 24, 2007.

Page 4 of above has comments:

http://alternet.org/story/68057/?page=4 

Comments at Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/41133.html 

An earlier post that has some info on Huckabee’s immigration record.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/pharisee-arrogance-on-immigration/

==Huckabee’s record on immigration from that post

==Huckabee

http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/000718.html

Gov. Mike Huckabee on Thursday heaped criticism upon immigration legislation in the Arkansas Legislature, describing it as “inflammatory . . . race-baiting and demagoguery.” He also challenged the Christian values of its main sponsor.

Huckabee said the bill, seeking to forbid public assistance and voting rights to undocumented immigrants, “inflames those who are racist and bigots and makes them think there’s a real problem. But there’s not.”

Was that voting rights you said Mike?

Friday, Jan 28, 2005

By Doug Thompson
Arkansas News Bureau

LITTLE ROCK - Gov. Mike Huckabee Thursday denounced a bill by Sen. Jim Holt that would deny state benefits to illegal immigrants as un-Christian, un-American, irresponsible and anti-life.

Holt, R-Springdale, replied later that Christian charity does not include turning a blind eye to lawbreaking.

Senate Bill 206, filed Wednesday, also would require proof of citizenzhip to register to vote and would require state agencies to report suspected cases of people living in the country illegally.

“Somebody needs to ask Sen. Holt what welfare this bill would stop,” Huckabee said in a question-and-answer period with reporters on Thursday morning. Many aid programs are state-administered but federally funded and are mandated to be available to people in need, Huckabee said.

Even if benefits to people who are in the U.S illegally could be stopped, “I don’t understand how a practicing Christian can turn his back on a child from this or any other state,” Huckabee said.

Huckabee said he took exception to characterization of immigrants in the bill and by its supporters as exploiters of social programs.

“Something that’s not worth sharing is not worth celebrating,” Huckabee said. “This is the kind of country that opens its doors. This bill expresses an un-American attitude.”

http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/28/News/316347.html

Draft Left Defines White Nationalism

November 24, 2007

The left approximately follows the following escalating levels of attack on whites. This doesn’t apply in all cases, but illustrates the phenomenon. We can formulate the following

Leftist Escalation of Attack Words Hypothesis

  1. Bigot or Nativist: Under leftism, any white who speaks up or about what is happening to whites, without using the word white.
  2. White nationalist. When the white uses the word white and just reports or repeats a fact incident, the left calls them white nationalist.
  3. White supremacist. If they say it should stop, the left calls them a white supremacist. If they propose specific action to make it stop, the likelihood of being called white supremacist goes up.

An example is the attacks on Brussels Journal, Vlaams Belang and Paul Belien by some at LGF. They were all attacked as white supremacist for not just saying what was happening to whites in Europe, but that what is happening to whites in Europe should stop.

Lets analyze the above paragraph. LGF reports on what is happening in Europe and condemns it. What is happening to whom? Its being done to white Europeans. But to say that is beyond the pale to LGF. Why does LGF condemn what is done to whites but that to say the victims are white Europeans they condemn? If they condemn what is done to whites, are they not saying it should stop being done to whites? But don’t want to say that explicitly?

Why do they say that stopping what is being done to whites in Europe is white supremacy? Filip Dewinter said he didn’t want his daughter to marry a black, and that is called white supremacism by his critics. But isn’t it rational?

As Steve Sailer documents, regression towards the mean in IQ means that children of black parents regress towards the mean of black IQ which is 85, 15 points below the white average. Thus a child of a white and black parent will, from this effect, tend to have a lower IQ than the white average. LGF condemned Filip Dewinter for wanting to avoid that. Why shouldn’t he?

Isn’t it irrational to want a lower IQ for your grand child? It would seem the definition of rationality would imply preferring high IQ to low IQ. Since marrying a black implies regression towards the black mean of lower IQ of 85 as Steve Sailer points out, this is irrational. Note that the black IQ is 85 in the U.S. In Africa its much lower. Europe has immigration of blacks primarily from Africa, so the black IQ there might be as low as 70. There has also been much less time for mixing there than in the U.S.

Being white and knowing the truth about statistics and data sources already makes you a covert white nationalist in the mind of the left. If you say the word white in relation to the victims identity, the left goes crazy. Even though they publicize hate crimes with black victims, if a white talks about white victims they are a racist to white nationalist to white supremacist. Saying the victims were white as a stand alone sentence is considered racist by many.

==Summary

If you tell what happens to whites in an incident or generally, the left calls you a bigot or nativist. If you use the word white while doing so, they call you a white nationalist. If you say it should stop, they call you a white supremacist. Listen to them. Observe them. This is real not just a joke. They are deadly serious.

==This is real

The EU has made it at least a draft policy to eliminate the white race in Europe and replace it with a mixed race.

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/11/wealth-of-mankind.html

VA quotes the following

EU Proposal for Mestizo Europe

BRUSSELS, July 27 (Reuters) - The European Union should admit up to 75 million immigrants over the next 50 years and be prepared to become a racially hybrid society, according to a paper to be discussed at an EU ministerial meeting on Friday.”

That’s a real government saying this as policy. They are doing it. They are doing it after the attacks in Malmo, London, Madrid, the car burnings in France, etc. After all this, they make it policy to eliminate the white race. This is the real thing. Its happening now. They are open about it.

The EU has taken ownership of London, Madrid, Malmo, the car burnings in France. The EU has said these are their policies. Listen, observe, believe. This is what is happening now. They say so.

==Following was after reading following discussion

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/11/america-people-of-no-race-no-nation.html

So is there something wrong with the term ‘white nationalist‘? I would say only the fact that it is necessary to prefix the term with the word ‘white.’ Old-style American nationalism (which undeniably many people find a negative word, preferring the term ‘patriotism’ which they find more positive) implies an identification with the traditional Anglo-Saxon culture of America.

Tanstaafl

http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2007/11/white-nationalism-and-anti-semitism.html

MM identifies Lawrence Auster, Vanishing American, John Savage, New Sisyphus, Age of Treason, and Old Atlantic Lighthouse as white-nationalist blogs.

Mencius Moldbug

http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/11/why-i-am-not-white-nationalist.html

I am not a white nationalist, but I do read white-nationalist blogs, and I’m not afraid to link to them. The undisputed champion in this department is Larry Auster. I am also fond of Vanishing American, John Savage, New Sisyphus, Age of Treason, and Old Atlantic Lighthouse. The two central organs of intellectual white nationalism in the US are American Renaissance and VDare. If there is a European equivalent, it is probably Brussels Journal. On all these sites, you’ll find thoughtful, well-written commentary that will expand your mind. I’m not sure all these writers would accept the white-nationalist label - this is just my own description.

..

This is rather academic. Another approach is to say that white nationalism is what people who call themselves “white nationalists” believe. John Savage has a good link summary, featuring a friendly debate between Steve Sailer (who is perhaps best classified as a Sailerist, a label I’m not at all afraid to stick on my shirt) and the editor of American Renaissance, Jared Taylor.

Perhaps the best summary of the white nationalist case I’ve seen, however, is this essay by the Norwegian blogger known only as Fjordman.

==Old Atlantic and White Nationalism?

OA like Vdare does not adopt the term white nationalism. This is a term for discussion. I, like everyone else, am trying to sort this out in my mind as to where we are, where we are going, and what will happen. I appreciate the writing of Vanishing American and the others listed above on this subject.

I do support almost zero immigration, not 250,000 per year. Under the Wright Island Theorem and Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem that inflow would still result in genetic replacement and zero survival factors for genes, even allowing for some outflow. We are not at a point of circulation.

White nationalism as an idea I consider to be a positive one, not a negative one. I see nothing wrong with those who adopt the term, simply from doing so.

I hope the break up of the U.S. can be avoided. I don’t want to see an Islamic Europe that has British and French nuclear weapons and wants to attack New York City because of the people who live there, or other American cities. This does require people in the West to help each other survive liberalism.

The people of the West do have to wake up. It does need to keep white majorities. There is a reality outside liberal TV shows that can’t be ignored. We do have to say we want to keep white majorities to actually keep them.

Those who want to stop terrorist immigration need to recognize that to do that you have to stop all legal Muslim immigration. Under liberalism, the only way to stop all legal Muslim immigration is to stop all legal immigration.

People have to see an upside to their own efforts. Fighting in wars, being called bigot and racist to stop immigration are not something people will do so that liberals can stay on top calling them names. They will do it for the survival of their own, not just for some abstract principle the writers of All in the Family cherish. The purpose of life is not to avoid being called names by liberals. That is not the purpose of the universe either.

==Mexican and Muslim Nationalism are the real thing

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/11/advice-from-legal-immigrant.html

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/11/preview-of-things-to-come.html

http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=5148

==Can we test the hypothesis?

Because nativist and bigot are used almost as standard terms for anyone the left disagrees with on immigration, we would expect these terms to dominate the terms “white nationalist” and “white supremacist”. So in looking at results we have to adjust for that.

Note the initial work didn’t look at racist in the searches, but that has been added in some cases. This seems to be the word of choice still. One can consider the hypothesis that the left just uses whatever word is in vogue, and they copy each other and the words they use are not used for their meaning but just because it makes them feel good to say them.

SPLC searches were not done initially but added after the strange Ron Paul results were found.

==Amren

Results 1 - 100 of about 67,000 for amren racist.

amren nativist

Results 1 - 46 of 46 for amren nativist.

amren “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 23,200 for amren “white nationalist.

amren “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 19,900 for amren “white supremacist.

==Jared Taylor

Results 1 - 100 of about 35,200 for “Jared Taylorracist.

“Jared Taylor” nativist

Results 1 - 100 of about 643 for “Jared Taylornativist.

“Jared Taylor” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 11,200 for “Jared Taylor” “white nationalist

“Jared Taylor” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 11,200 for “Jared Taylor” “white supremacist.

==Lawrence Auster

Results 1 - 100 of about 28,500 for Lawrence Auster” racist.

“Lawrence Auster” nativist

Results 1 - 100 of about 677 for Lawrence Auster” nativist.

“Lawrence Auster” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 63 of 63 for Lawrence Auster” “white nationalist.

“Lawrence Auster” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 807 for Lawrence Auster” “white supremacist.

==James Watson

“James Watson” bigot

Results 1 - 100 of about 22,600 for James Watsonbigot.

Results 1 - 100 of about 152,000 for James Watsonracist.

“James Watson” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 62 of 62 for James Watson” “white nationalist.

“James Watson” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 820 for James Watson” “white supremacist.

==Peter Brimelow

Results 1 - 100 of about 27,500 for Peter Brimelow” racist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 9,590 for Peter Brimelow” nativist.

“Peter Brimelow “white supremacist”
Results 1 - 100 of about 995 for Peter Brimelow “white supremacist.

A quote mark was left out after Brimelow, so we can repeat this:

“Peter Brimelow” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 611 for Peter Brimelow” “white supremacist.
Results 1 - 100 of about 41,000 for Peter Brimelow “white nationalist.

==Steve Sailer

Results 1 - 100 of about 108,000 for “Steve Sailer” racist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 25,800 for “Steve Sailer” bigot

Results 1 - 100 of about 745 for “Steve Sailer” “white nationalist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 821 for “Steve Sailer” “white supremacist.

==Virgil Goode

Virgil Goode said stop Muslim immigration. He said nothing about whites or anything about race. But Goode did say stop something. What was he called?

Results 1 - 100 of about 41,800 for Virgil Goode” racist

bigot “Virgil Goode”

Results 1 - 100 of about 20,400 for bigotVirgil Goode”

Islamophobe “Virgil Goode”

Results 1 - 100 of about 972 for Islamophobe “Virgil Goode”.
“white supremacist” “Virgil Goode”

Results 1 - 100 of about 661 for white supremacist” “Virgil Goode”.

“white nationalist” “Virgil Goode”

Results 1 - 19 of 19 for white nationalist” “Virgil Goode”.

==Senator George Allen

Results 1 - 100 of about 168,000 for George Allenracist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 71,000 for George Allenbigot.

Results 1 - 100 of about 15,100 for George Allennativist

Results 1 - 100 of about 606 for George Allen” “White nationalist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 15,300 for George Allen” “White supremacist.

George Allen just used the word macaca.

Results 1 - 100 of about 164,000 for George Allen” macaca.

Results 1 - 100 of about 783 for George Allen” macaca “white supremacist

The hate against George Allen and Virgil Goode was a national obsession. The instant association of both with white supremacism and white nationalism is extreme. The searches could be repeated with -ism instead of -ist. Both Allen and Goode are from Virginia.

==Vdare

Results 1 - 100 of about 157,000 for Vdare racist.

Vdare nativist

Results 1 - 100 of about 9,320 for Vdare nativist.

“white nationalist” Vdare

Results 1 - 100 of about 10,100 for white nationalist” Vdare.

Vdare “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 12,300 for Vdare “white supremacist.

Vdare has used the word white, said what is happening to whites using the word white, said to stop it and proposed specific action. They are called white supremacist more than white nationalist.

==Lou Dobbs

Results 1 - 100 of about 379,000 for “Lou Dobbs” racist.

nativist “Lou Dobbs”

Results 1 - 100 of about 52,300 for nativist “Lou Dobbs”.

Lou Dobbs does not describe his victims as white and does not propose remedies for preserving whites qua whites. He emphasizes amnesty but also discusses guest worker programs as harming Americans, independent of being white or not.

“Lou Dobbs” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 734 for “Lou Dobbs” “white nationalist.

“Lou Dobbs” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 32,200 for “Lou Dobbs” “white supremacist.

“Lou Dobbs” Nazi site:splcenter.org

Results 1 - 33 of 33 from splcenter.org for “Lou Dobbs” Nazi.

Results 1 - 24 of 24 from splcenter.org for “Lou Dobbs” “white supremacist”.
Some results talk about guests on Lou Dobbs show. But it seems that we are seeing the emergence of support for a hypothesis that they don’t stop at calling someone white nationalist but move right up to white supremacist.

== Pat Buchanan

Results 1 - 100 of about 262,000 for Pat Buchananracist.

“Pat Buchanan” nativist

Results 1 - 100 of about 42,500 for Pat Buchanannativist

“Pat Buchanan” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 10,400 for Pat Buchanan” “white nationalist.

“Pat Buchanan” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 24,400 for Pat Buchanan” “white supremacist.

Results 1 - 54 of 54 from splcenter.org for “Pat Buchanan” Nazi.

Results 1 - 35 of 35 from splcenter.org for “Pat Buchanan” “white supremacist”.
Pat Buchanan has explicitly talked about what is happening to whites and the West and said it should stop. The results in his case are that he is called white supremacist more than white nationalist. So this supports the hypothesis.

==Tom Tancredo

Results 1 - 100 of about 530,000 for Tom Tancredo” racist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 83,900 for Tom Tancredo” bigot.

Results 1 - 100 of about 45,800 for Tom Tancredo” nativist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 808 for Tom Tancredo” “white nationalist.

“Tom Tancredo” “white supremacist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 33,300 for Tom Tancredo” “white supremacist.

Results 1 - 13 of 13 from splcenter.org for “Tom Tancredo” “white supremacist”.

Results 1 - 39 of 39 from splcenter.org for “Tom Tancredo” Nazi.

==Brussels Journal

Results 1 - 100 of about 182,000 for Brussels Journalracist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 30,300 for Brussels Journalbigot.

Results 1 - 100 of about 801 for Brussels Journalnativist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 21,400 for Brussels Journalindigenous.

Results 1 - 75 of 75 for Brussels Journal” “white nationalist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 793 for Brussels Journal” “white supremacist.

We see that there is almost immediate escalation from white nationalist to white supremacist.

==BNP

Results 1 - 100 of about 702,000 for BNP racist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 17,800 for BNP “white supremacist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 24,300 for BNP “white nationalist.

Results 1 - 29 of 29 for BNP Ballerinawhite nationalist

Results 1 - 62 of 62 for BNP Ballerinawhite supremacist.

==Ron Paul

Results 1 - 100 of about 234,000 for “Ron Paulbigot.

Results 1 - 100 of about 37,600 for “Ron Paulnativist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 1,550,000 for “Ron Paulracist.

“Ron Paul” “white nationalist”

Results 1 - 100 of about 51,100 for “Ron Paul” “white nationalist.

Results 1 - 100 of about 58,200 for “Ron Paul” “white supremacist.

How did Ron Paul get labeled with over 1 million hits on racist and over 50,000 hits on White Supremacist? He is not even a particularly strong advocate for immigration restriction relative to the other Republican candidates. He is against amnesty, but has supported H-1B and legal immigration. The most he has done is be against anchor baby.

Hypothesis: The enormous number of hits on Ron Paul shows its being white and not part of the establishment that gets you labeled. It doesn’t matter what you really say or do. White, non-”mainstream” and you are racist and white supremacist to them.

“Ron Paul” site:splcenter.org

One of the hits:

Extremist Group Announces Speech by Congressman | Hatewatch

Ron Paul is not necessarily a racist for one speech with this group, The SPLC should come to a Ron Paul New York meetup group meeting or listen to those
www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/10/08/extremist-group-announces-speech-by-congressman/ -
Hypothesis: This is smear by association. Ron Paul will talk to anyone as a person and not call them names but say what he thinks without telling them what they want to hear. This makes him racist and “white supremacist”. The failure to condemn those he should condemn, and treating everyone with civility and talking to them on an equal level using logic and facts is all that it takes to be named racist and white supremacist.

“Ron Paul” Nazi site:splcenter.org

Results 1 - 4 of 4 from splcenter.org for “Ron Paul” Nazi.

==Christian

Results 1 - 100 of about 627 from splcenter.org for Christian Nazi.

SPLCenter.org: Christian Identity

Christian Meeting Turns Into Attack on Gays. BRIEFS. NSM Attack Sparks Rift · KKK Suit Ends With Award to Victims · Neo-Nazi Financier Arrested
www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=632 - 40k - Cached - Similar pages
Christian Nazi site:splcenter.org

Results 1 - 100 of about 306 from splcenter.org for Christian “white supremacist”.

SPLCenter.org: The Big Lie

Murder victim Channon Christian was the focus of a rally by white parroting the key white supremacist talking point, characterizing the Christian-Newsom
www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=819 - 51k - Cached - Similar pages

One of the hypotheses was that just to know the truth and speak the truth would get you attacked.

==Jesus

Results 1 - 61 of 61 from splcenter.org for Jesus “white supremacist”.

Results 1 - 83 of 83 from splcenter.org for Jesus Nazi.

==God

God Nazi site:splcenter.org

Results 1 - 100 of about 143 from splcenter.org for God “white supremacist”.

Results 1 - 100 of about 290 from splcenter.org for God Nazi.

==

Results 1 - 100 of about 813 from splcenter.org for “white Supremacist”.

Thus a little more than 1 in 6 times that “white supremacist” is used by SPLC on their website, God is associated with it.

Results 1 - 100 of about 1,720 from splcenter.org for nazi.

Thus a little more than 1 in 6 times that Nazi is used by SPLC on their website, God is associated with it.

==

God, then Christian and Jesus were searched at SPLC after the Ron Paul results were found and then others checked at SPLC for Nazi and “White Supremacist”.

==Analysis

The original hypothesis has some support but is clearly only partly valid. The main problem is that the left in general and SPLC in particular want to ramp up to Nazi and white supremacist rather quickly. The term racist is still the preferred term for any comment from the right on the topic of immigration, crime, etc. The Delaware State and Washington public school programs that teach all whites are racist also prefers that term to saying say that all whites are Nazi or all whites are white supremacists.

Despite the randomness in the use of these words, there is still some tendency to escalate in rhetoric in the way the original hypothesis outlined. If you talk about what is happening, say its happening to whites, say it should stop, and say the white race deserves to live and to continue, and that its appropriate to act to do so, you are almost certain to be called a bigot or nativist, and have a good chance of being called a white nationalist or white supremacist. Distinguishing between white nationalist and white supremacist may be something only specialists do. It seems once they go for “white nationalist” they immediately go to “white supremacist”.
Those who call for ending the white race are usually cheered. Its very rare they are criticized. Nor is any term like white ethnocide or racecide, whitecide or white zeroist used to describe this in any standard way. Even though its openly advocated, planned, and announced by the EU as draft policy.

Bill Clinton also cheered it and in effect admitted that it is the policy of the U.S. government to make whites a minority in the U.S. Since the US engages in affirmative action and other acts, this amounts to making whitecide US government policy. This is because the cumulative effect of this policy is to reduce European white fertility to below replacement, which it is now world wide in almost every country if not every country.

If you listen to what they say about whitecide, repeat it, say you disagree with that policy, say you want to oppose the policy and propose specific action to stop whitecide, then they say you are a white nationalist or white supremacist with a good probability. It would be interesting to check what SPLC and ADL use for these individuals on their websites. This can be done by adding site: and the name of the website.

Basically, if you speak up, say what is happening, say its happening to whites, say whites have a right to survive and propose specific measures to stop it, then they are going to go after you as a white supremacist. They also will go quickly from nativist and bigot right through white nationalist to white supremacist without pausing. They are ready to pounce on anything a party or well-known person says to immediately push them all the way to white supremacist. Bottom line, if you speak up and out they are going to target you and they want to escalate to white supremacist. Other searches would be on Nazi, which likely has similar results.

==

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1213928

The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.

The above implies that if you have two genes in some frequency in the immigrant population, that under one way migration that frequency becomes the frequency on the island.

From PDF, conclusion:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/island-model/

=

If the EU bothered to read science articles on the internet, they would find out the end result of their actions is not a new race of white and non-white, its just elimination of whites. That is what the math says. Its a theorem.

== Random, Emotion, Civility, Failure to Condemn Hypotheses

The above analysis and searches leads to some new hypotheses to consider.

Hypothesis: Racist is the preferred term for attacking whites who talk about any subject involving race, immigration, etc. If the person says something like macaca, stop Muslim immigration, don’t use the Koran for oaths, etc. they will be deluged with racist.

Hypothesis: The use of the words white nationalist, white supremacist is almost random and independent of what the person said. Instead, these terms reflect the emotion of the leftist.

Hypothesis: Nazi is also a word that just means the leftist is too angry (or full of hate) to stop at racist and has to say more.

Hypothesis: The attack on Ron Paul and association with racist and white supremacist shows intent to smear. Ron Paul is a very mild mannered man. His main issue is smaller government. He is also anti war. He is for immigration restriction. He is anti big government in all forms. He treats everyone with civility. He will, if he has time, talk to anyone about anything, listen to them, and treat them with civility and as serious whatever the person says. He does not condemn people. Ron Paul then says what he thinks and tries to use reason and facts to persuade those he disagrees with instead of calling them names. This whole set of attributes produces an extreme reaction of what might be called hate but definitely fear. His civility and rationality, fairness and openness to everyone threatens the whole rule by smear and fear official information complex.

Hypothesis: There is no strategy to keep from being called white supremacist, white nationalist, Nazi, racist, bigot, nativist, etc. if you want to say anything that is non-establishment or if you will treat anyone with civility and not condemn them as a person for what they say. If you adopt civility towards all, are willing to listen to anyone, and will respond with civility and reason, they will go ballistic and start calling you racist, Nazi, white nationalist and white supremacist.

Hypothesis: There are funded groups that try to organize attacks on leaders like Lou Dobbs, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, as well as Lawrence Auster, Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, the BNP Ballerina, etc. These attacks follow a script and the script ends up calling them Nazi, white nationalist, white supremacist. The script doesn’t call for waiting at white nationalist, but as the numbers indicate, once they use white nationalist, they go to white supremacist. Racist is used without any compunction as an entry level word.

Hypothesis: Attacks using Nazi, white nationalist and white supremacist may be used partly to get attention from search engines. The use of the word racist doesn’t get enough identification. SPLC has a high revenue stream. Just using words like racist or bigot isn’t going to get as much attention in search engines as Nazi and white supremacist. They may want to use stronger terms to get more attention and then more funding. This also may be why God and Nazi go together so much at the SPLC website.

This is draft and preliminary. All statements should be restated as questions or hypotheses. This is subject to revision. All comments welcome. All other disclaimers apply.

Mankind ’shortening the universe’s life’ Dent Krauss Fallacy

November 23, 2007

“This is really weird, this scientist claims the more we look at the universe the faster we cause it’s destruction. It’s way over my head!” By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 12:01am GMT 21/11/2007

“The damaging allegations are made by Profs Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and James Dent of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, who suggest that by making this observation in 1998 we may have caused the cosmos to revert to an earlier state when it was more likely to end. “Incredible as it seems, our detection of the dark energy may have reduced the life-expectancy of the universe,” Prof Krauss tells New Scientist.”

The interpretation of quantum mechanics used by the authors of this article is not appropriate for this application. Quantum systems evolve without human observation. The authors claim the universe had already switched from one state to another before humans.

Now they claim because humans observe the universe for the first time this causes a change of state by that alone, not the measurement apparatus itself. Cosmic rays already produce high energy events. The electronic apparatus used to observe dark matter is all composed of molecules acting at normal energy levels.

X-ray observations can’t do what they say. “Five years ago, a team at the University of Alabama in Huntsville lead by Prof Richard Lieu reported finding large amounts of extra “soft” (relatively low-energy) x-rays coming from the vast space in the middle of galaxy clusters. Although the atoms that emitted them were thought to be spread thinly through space (less than one atom per cubit metre), they would have filled billions of billions of cubic light years.”

The observation used normal electronics to measure x-rays. We create x-rays on earth at x-ray machines. X-rays are part of atomic and molecular physics and are created and absorbed throughout the galaxy.

The particular x-rays here were created in a supernova far away. All humans did was collect the x-rays here and look at their coherence properties to understand the meaning relative to a supernova. The scientists are, in effect, claiming that this activity by humans is changing the quantum state of the universe with regard to a deep parameter.

However, the information about the super nova already exists in the coherence properties of the x-rays as they spread across the cosmos, its not created by the measurement. All the other x-rays from the event not looked at still have the same coherence properties. Thus the universe has already registered the state of the information from the supernova long before humans figure it out using normal electronic detectors operating at normal energy levels of atoms and molecules.

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/41099.html

read more | digg story

==

The original paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1821

Peter Woit implies that the Telegraph does not interpret the paper correctly.

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=621

The above analysis is based on the Telegraph article, i.e. whatever Dent Krauss wrote, the Telegraph article contains a fallacy which is refuted above. Whether Dent Krauss expound that fallacy or not in their paper is a different issue.

Woit also has a column on the death of Sidney Coleman, a well-known math physics quantum field theorist at Harvard.

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=620

I had heard the story that when Steven Weinberg lectured on quantum field theory at Harvard, Coleman sat in the class and asked him questions. He also was famous for smoking cigarettes. He died at age 70.

http://images.google.com/images?svnum=100&um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=Sidney+Coleman&btnG=Search+Images

There was a cartoon of Coleman smoking a cigarette, saying “Its as easy” relative to a problem in math/physics. This doesn’t seem to be on the internet.

http://www.physics.harvard.edu/QFT/sidneyfest.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Coleman

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-hed_coleman_20nov20,0,7943823.story

==A comment at Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/41099.html 

November 23rd, 2007 at 17:39:54 From: TonyRage
 
Fallaci Admirer. I think you missed the anaology to Schroedinger’s Cat. The scientists are saying that by ackowleding the existing of dark matter, and the effect is has on the expansion of the universe (which can apparently expand only so far before… implosion?), we have created the possibility of increasing the speed at which the universe is heading towards it’s end. Basically, we looked in the box, and saw the dead cat. Before that, the universe existed in two states simultaneously. The good news is that the difference between time at which the two universes will end, while possibly huge, is stil irrelavant because mankind will not be along to experience it. Something will smash us from space long before that happens.

The Cat issue relates to say a measurement on say spin of an electron that can be up or down.  The photons in this case have spread out all over the universe.  The coherence properties used to make the inference are already in the x-rays at space like separations.  Thus its long past the point at which reduction has happened when the light gets here.

There are plenty of x-rays from the nova not observed by us, which have the same coherence properties.  We therefore didn’t change the state of the universe, it had already registered the needed coherence properties of the light long before the measurement was made.

The paper by Einstein Podolsky and Rosen can be referenced on this and Wiki or others should have articles on EPR.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox

Pharisee Arrogance on Immigration

November 23, 2007

Pharisees, whether religious or atheist or in-between think that they control God or the universe or society. Liberal pharisees are engaged in racial-engineering. They are creating a new race, in the liberal image. This is a race never before seen.

Vanishing American discusses this”

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/11/wealth-of-mankind.html

VA quotes the following

EU Proposal for Mestizo Europe

BRUSSELS, July 27 (Reuters) - The European Union should admit up to 75 million immigrants over the next 50 years and be prepared to become a racially hybrid society, according to a paper to be discussed at an EU ministerial meeting on Friday.”

As VA makes clear with other examples, the racial engineers are making their program of manipulation blatantly clear. They have declared their goal to eliminate the white race, the racist race, completely. They will call anyone who opposes their new racial purity code a white supremacist. Any white without a drop, and more than a drop, of authentic indigenous DNA is denied food salt and water and has 3 days to leave the planet, without anyone’s assistance in the process.

Mike ‘umble Huckabee is an example of a modern Christian day pharisee race engineer.

Lawrence Auster discusses Huckabee and a Jonah Goldberg column on him:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/009270.html

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=ron_paul_isnt_that_scary&ns=JonahGoldberg&dt=11/21/2007&page=2

Goldberg on Huckabee:

In this respect, Huckabee’s philosophy is conventionally liberal, or progressive. What he wants government to do certainly differs in important respects from what Hillary Clinton wants, but the limits he would place on governmental do-goodery are primarily tactical or practical, not philosophical or constitutional. This isn’t to say he - or Hillary - is a would-be tyrant, but simply to note that the progressive notion of the state as a loving, caring parent is becoming a bipartisan affair.

According to race-engineers like Huckabee, anyone not part of the new race they are creating is not an authentic indigenous human, especially if they are white, the ultimate inauthentic non-indigenous human. If whites want to have a place to be indigenous to, they better speak up now, because they are about to be pushed off the planet by the new racial engineers.

The left talks about white supremacists, but a more accurate term for the left, including Huckabee, is pharisee supremacist. To them, the rest are all to be discarded.

== Comment left at VA link above:

Good post VA. We should also remember, the asymptotic (long term) state from immigration is not a mixture of old and new, its only new. This is the Wright Island Model.

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wor…-way-migration/

The elites who think they will get a mixture should read the science journals first. They can’t control this process, the process takes over and controls them.

==Pharisee mindset

  1. Their purity means they control what God or the universe or society does.
  2. They control the present and thus the future and the interpretation and meaning of the past.
  3. There is no force or power, whether God, the universe, or in-between that they do not interpret and control.
  4. What they set in motion, they control, it never controls them.
  5. They don’t have to read what is in science journals, or statistics on government web-sites, or the opinion of those beneath them.
  6. What they swear by themselves using their oaths of purity is all that we or they need to know.
  7. All that are beneath them are dust. What is beneath them can be molded as putty into whatever form suits the whims of the pharisees at the time, and then changed to any new form. The putty has no memory of what form it was, it only knows what the pharisee molds it to be.
  8. They exist and have power for eternity independent of any basis in physical reality. They did not gain power by any process that could take it away. They are eternal and immutably in power and control. They are the universe. They are society. They are God.

==Huckabee

http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/000718.html

Gov. Mike Huckabee on Thursday heaped criticism upon immigration legislation in the Arkansas Legislature, describing it as “inflammatory . . . race-baiting and demagoguery.” He also challenged the Christian values of its main sponsor.

Huckabee said the bill, seeking to forbid public assistance and voting rights to undocumented immigrants, “inflames those who are racist and bigots and makes them think there’s a real problem. But there’s not.”

Was that voting rights you said Mike?

Friday, Jan 28, 2005

By Doug Thompson
Arkansas News Bureau

LITTLE ROCK - Gov. Mike Huckabee Thursday denounced a bill by Sen. Jim Holt that would deny state benefits to illegal immigrants as un-Christian, un-American, irresponsible and anti-life.

Holt, R-Springdale, replied later that Christian charity does not include turning a blind eye to lawbreaking.

Senate Bill 206, filed Wednesday, also would require proof of citizenzhip to register to vote and would require state agencies to report suspected cases of people living in the country illegally.

“Somebody needs to ask Sen. Holt what welfare this bill would stop,” Huckabee said in a question-and-answer period with reporters on Thursday morning. Many aid programs are state-administered but federally funded and are mandated to be available to people in need, Huckabee said.

Even if benefits to people who are in the U.S illegally could be stopped, “I don’t understand how a practicing Christian can turn his back on a child from this or any other state,” Huckabee said.

Huckabee said he took exception to characterization of immigrants in the bill and by its supporters as exploiters of social programs.

“Something that’s not worth sharing is not worth celebrating,” Huckabee said. “This is the kind of country that opens its doors. This bill expresses an un-American attitude.”

http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/28/News/316347.html

Under Huckabeeism, its God’s job to know the math. In Huckabeeism, you don’t have to worry about the consequences of what you do, just do what feels good. In Huckabeeism, you do what feels good, and its God’s job to fix it after you break it.  In Huckabeeland, you break it, God own’s it.

Black Friday Made in China

November 23, 2007

Chairman Mao:

The former capitalist will buy poisoned toys for his own child.

How to find American made toys:

http://childparenting.about.com/od/toys/a/toyrecalls_2.htm

Can buy direct

http://www.unclegoose.com/

http://www.usmadetoys.com/

Internet search “American made toys

No knowledge or recommendation, just a search result:

http://www.madeinusa.org/nav.cgi?data/toys&

http://www.stillmadeinusa.com/toysngames.html

Following seems very good with quality traditional makers of US toys that go back generations in some cases:

http://www.howtobuyamerican.com/bamw/bamw-051112-toys.shtml

search “made in America”

Search Toys R Us KKR

Look for the Henry Kravis Doll, it destroys good jobs for Americans and outputs poisoned covered beads to sell to kids.

If retailers owned by Wall Street don’t want to sell made in America toys, then buy them on the internet. The internet is still made in America, even if AEI neocons say its racist not to have it programmed by Chinese and Indian H-1B’s.

The Henry Kravis Doll and the saying attributed to Chairman Mao are satire, and neither should be attributed to the other.

Britain can’t forgive Ian Smith for its betrayal

November 23, 2007

Britain’s establishment still can’t forgive whites in Rhodesia and South Africa for having betrayed them.  When will Britain’s establishment forgive the white British people for betraying them by immigration?

When will Enoch Powell’s name not get a candidate for Parliament sacked by the Conservative Party?  What is conservative about the CP?  Doesn’t it have the same immigration policy for Britain as the Communist Party?

Lawrence Auster on Ian Smith:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/009276.html

Stephen Glover in the Daily Mail gets it right, Ian Smith was right at the time, when it mattered.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=495502&in_page_id=1772&in_author_id=244&in_check=N

I realised then that, whatever might be said against Rhodesia, it had a sophisticated civilisation that was worth preserving.

Where he was undoubtedly at fault, however, was in not encouraging the growth of a moderate, educated, black middle-class with democratic values.

Actually Mugabe was educated in Rhodesia at college to be the moderate middle class.  But the Soviet Union offered them power and they took it.  The way you get a middle class is paying people for their work and having a safe society.  Its then up to the people to respond to the incentives.   Rhodesia and other colonial powers educated black leaders at college and what they got was Soviet sponsored revolutionaries.

Auster is right now when it matters and was right in 1990 when it mattered on immigration.   If Bush Sr. and the Republicans had listened then, we wouldn’t have lost the 3000 lives in 9-11 from the 19 Muslim immigrants who came after the WTC 1993 attack by Muslim immigrants.

Failing to connect the dots 9-11 immigration

November 23, 2007

The US intelligence community’s national director has said it failed to connect the dots before 9-11.

http://reason.com/news/show/123018.html

Rant: Unconnected Dots

Why the FBI failed to stop 9/11

Jeff Taylor | December 2007 Print Edition

For years federal authorities have argued that antiquated laws kept the cops from stopping 9/11. They said the failure to prevent the terrorist attacks demonstrated the need for the PATRIOT Act and every other proposed expansion of the government’s surveillance powers. But in testimony before Congress in September, Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell changed tack, saying “9/11 should have and could have been prevented” after all; the authorities simply “didn’t connect the dots.”

Why not now? Terrorism here comes from immigration. The way you stop terrorism here is you stop immigration here. Bush has said that Islam is a Religion of Peace and therefore he needs to take away our civil liberties here. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have said the same thing.

How do we deal with Bliarisms and Bushisms? We have to speak up and tell the truth. We can’t be protected from Muslim immigration unless we say the truth, we want it stopped. If we can’t say it, we can’t get it. If we can’t get it, some of us will die.

That’s what happened before 9-11. The FBI didn’t connect the dots, and 3000 people died in America. Not connecting the dots is fatal. Muslim immigrants came here to kill us. We need to stop Muslim immigration. This is a war that started in 622 A.D. when Muhammad went to Medina. Within 2 years he was killing Jewish men and taking their women and children as slaves. Its time to wake up to what we are fighting. Its the Religion of Attack.

On 9-11, they said America was under attack. It still is. The West still is. Time to connect the dots. Islam immigration immolation of the West. Connect the dots. Stop all immigration. Call your rep. They won’t stop only Muslim immigration so the only way to stop Muslim immigration is to ask them to stop all legal immigration.

Muslims come by legal immigration, asylum, family reunification, H-1B, guest worker, diversity visa, etc. Ask your rep or senator to stop all legal immigration and list all the categories.

Bush says we have to give up our civil liberties to keep our security and Muslim immigration. In fact, we get neither. The only way to have our security and our civil liberties is to stop all Muslim immigration. The only way to stop all legal Muslim immigration is to stop all legal immigration. Free fax to your senator and congressman to stop legal immigration:

http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter

Remember, amnesty is just another form of legal immigration. America is a terrible thing to waste. Virgil Goode was right, stop all Muslim immigration. But the establishment said, its stop all legal immigration or none, its “racist” to stop only Muslim immigration. So we must ask them to stop all legal immigration. That is what they told us to ask for.

Tom Tancredo asked for a total moratorium and was not attacked for that. Tancredo was attacked for his ad on Muslims and his statement to nuke Mecca if they attacked us here again. The establishment said they wouldn’t strike back if they attacked us here. They heard that. That means we have to stop them coming here. The establishment has said, its all legal immigration that is stopped or none.

The only way to stop terrorist immigration is to stop Muslim immigration. The only way to stop Muslim immigration is to stop all legal immigration. The only way to stop all legal immigration is to tell your senator and congressman to stop all legal immigration and vote for candidates who advocate a moratorium like Tom Tancredo.

http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter

Thanksgiving

November 21, 2007

Days of Prayer and Thanksgiving began in England before they began in the American colonies.

http://chi.gospelcom.net/GLIMPSEF/Glimpses/glmps071.shtml

The Inverted World has suggested that humility was part of what gave the West an advantage. Humility is the admission of not-knowing. The Chinese test system was the opposite at the time. It emphasized that what was worth knowing was already known.

Liberals seem to lack humility. They have been calling the rest racists, bigots, white supremacists, etc. for decades. They have created TV shows based on liberals making fun of non-liberals, such as All in the Family. That show was responsible in part for not stopping Mohammed Atta on 9-11. The agent said he felt it was wrong to stop Atta because he was Arab, not because he was Muslim. It was being racist the man was afraid of, not being Islamophobic.

A Day of Prayer and Thanksgiving can be an occasion for humility or pride. Liberals seem to take pride. Their can be pride in humility. Without a farther out goal to strive for, goals can become wrapped around competition over almost anything.

Liberals say the goal is not to be racist. For them this comes before survival. This leads them to pursue policies that will eliminate whites from a majority and thus eliminate liberalism. Lawrence Auster has pointed this out many times.

The Fermi Paradox is the calculation that if other advanced civilizations exist, then they should be here. But they aren’t. So either we are the first and only to exist anywhere near here, or advanced civilizations destroy themselves. Liberals don’t recognize a long term survival probability of advanced civilization as a goal.

A long term survival probability for civilization to last 1 billion years means not doing stupid things. Third world immigration is stupid. Letting China and India take over our universities and technology and factories is stupid. These are not increasing the long term survival probability of civilization but putting it at risk.

Hispanic and other 3rd world immigration that is low IQ and low in other civilization qualities as Auster calls them is a mistake. It too lowers the survival probability of civilization. When we use the long term survival probability of civilization as a goal, we can change our decisions.

Rhodesia, South Africa, and Israel all contributed to civilization. Rhodesia and South Africa were allowed to fall. C. Rice is now pushing for the fall of Israel. The Palestinians are not contributing to civilization and they and the entire Islamic world are a risk factor to civilization’s survival.

Quantum mechanics tells us that there is an information function that contains the entire information content of the universe. This function is given a variety of names. These include state vector and the somewhat misleading wave function. This function evolves in time. From a qm point of view, meaning is in this function.

This state function or information function contains every person according to qm. It is the hopes and fears of all the years literally. It is sometimes said that humans are the way of atoms have of knowing about atoms.

Atoms already know about atoms in the sense of forces or potentials or interactions. Its knowledge in a different sense that humans have. Humans store knowledge of the universe’s history and some of its future in their mind. This is a type of self-awareness different than just knowing another particle by its potential.

One purpose for the universe is to increase the self-awareness coded into the information function to a maximal state. That would also involve maximizing the self-control of the universe over itself. This would reflect “values”. To achieve such self-awareness, one value must be self-knowledge. Knowledge in general must also be a goal.

Some things to do with this maximal self-awareness is to survive any fate of the universe like a big crunch. This might be to create new universes, make use of higher dimensions, code some sort of information into tiny elements of the universe, code the psi function to survive a big bounce, put information into black holes, although they may have finite life, make use of lower levels of quantum information we may discover, such as strings.

Liberals don’t identify any of this as important to them. For them, the goal is not to be racist. For that, they would allow civilization and human life to end and the universe to become a non-self-aware universe, i.e. a dead universe. If humans are the only life to arise capable of advanced civilization, this would waste the universe. Perhaps its the only one.

The universe may arise from math. We don’t really know the meaning of existence. It may be that all mathematical objects exist and the universe is one of those. This does not mean it is arbitrary. Its nature, i.e. definition, may make it non-arbitrary.

Whatever one’s reaction to these logical possibilities, its clear that liberalism is myopic. Liberalism is about feeling pain at the suffering of others and elevating the relief of that to the prime directive. For this purpose, liberals will sacrifice civilization and those who contribute or maintain civilization. The Buffet Gates foundation is focused on short term pain not on civilization.

Alleviating short term pain does not minimize long term pain or achieve other useful goals. The liberal ethics really has no long term forward looking component. Liberalism can’t say some people are part of advanced civilization more than others or are more necessary than others for the survival and advancement of civilization or something like the state of the qm information function.

Liberalism, as stated before, is remarkably myopic. It doesn’t really think in terms of structure, incentives, or the state of the system, whatever system is at issue. Liberalism is happy to destroy schools, turn over know-how to hostile forces, and to create whites as a minority in their own lands. Zimbabwe and South Africa show that non-whites will choose their own leaders, even if they will choose self-destruction for those societies over whites.

Detroit shows the same thing. Liberals try to blame Robert Mugabe on Ian Smith. Liberals can’t blame Detroit on Ian Smith. They just don’t show it. How many reports have we had on any news show on the state of Detroit? Why not show Detroit if they show New Orleans?

Even New Orleans is only mentioned as a drive by racism accusation. To actually report on New Orleans in-depth raises issues inconsistent with liberalism. The MSM quickly realized that they had to drop coverage of Katrina because it was showing reality they had been denying. So New Orleans disappeared from our TV’s because it showed the MSM were not showing Detroit or major parts of our cities.

Those city sections are not just spoken of. Why can’t whites go into large zones in America? Why are more such zones being created in LA or other cities? Why are entire states to become the next no-go zones? These are not questions the MSM wants people thinking about.

The MSM simply blanks out the truth about out country. The MSM wants each story to stand alone without any meaning. Meaning is not something the MSM does. This is because when you put the information together, it shows what polls show, the country is engaged in self-indulgent self-destruction.

The MSM is behind that as is corporate and university and education system and political system America. These systems concentrate on each thing as separate and don’t teach integration, i.e. to put it all together and ask what it means. Asking what it means would lead to realizing the West is engaging in suicide by immigration from the third world and from Asia. The third world is destructive, and China is actively hostile and taking over our universities, factories, technical