In his memoir, he wrote: “When I heard my father or one or one of my uncles refer to an honoured ancestor or a notable event from our family’s past, my boy’s imagination would conjure up some future day of glory when I would add my own paragraph to the family’s legend.”
Of all the claims in support of John McCain’s bid for the White House, perhaps none is quite as grand as this. As he arrived in London today, the publishers of his new book insisted the Republican senator’s family was descended from the Scottish king, Robert the Bruce.
- guardian.co.uk,
- Thursday March 20 2008
But McCain as policy supports immigration replacement.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
McCain is acting like an infinitely long lived individual in these quotes. But his policy of immigration replacement would cut that off for Scots Irish or English. Since they are going extinct, they have no line of ancestry to add to for a future young John McCain to want to emulate or even hear of.
The new immigrants will tell stories of their descent, from Aztec kings or from Muhammad or a Chinese emperor. Their loyalty will be to their group.
Replacement immigration means people don’t have the same incentives or rewards from their choices. So their rational behavior changes. As society adapts to that, its morality changes as well. Loyalty to old groups for example disappears, hastening their demise. People identify with new groups. Promises made to old members from old groups, Veterans benefits, social security and medicare, may not be honored by the new groups, who may have less money in any case to spend on the dying elements of other groups.
Vanishing American has a discussion of McCain and his Scots Irish ancestry.
http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2008/04/scots-irish-and-mccain.html
VA makes the point that many in the South are English, more so than Scots Irish and that this may apply to John McCain.
Some in the UK have noted that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are Scots who pursue genetic replacement immigration of the English. The Labour party depends on Scot votes, and would lose its majority without representatives from Scotland. It would in fact sink like a rock into obscurity without them.
Takemag had an article on Jim Webb who is Scots Irish.
What the Hell Happened to Jim?—James Webb Talks Like Pat Buchanan, Votes Like Harry Reid
Posted by W. James Antle III on March 17, 2008Webb enjoyed the support of many paleo bloggers familiar to readers of this webzine. The leading paleo magazines discussed his candidacy in the same glowing terms that once appeared in reviews of his books. My former boss, The American Conservative editor Scott McConnell, hoped Webb would be Virginia’s “most interesting emissary to the upper chamber since the 19th century” and jokingly asked the day after the midterm elections, “Is it too soon for a ‘Webb for President’ bandwagon?” Not to be outdone, I observed, “Webb is presented as a kind of folk hero, equal parts Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and—at least among his more conservative backers—Ronald Reagan.” The specific comparisons were made by my sources, but the high hopes were mine as well.If paleoconservatism is, as Chilton Williamson has written, “the expression of rootedness: a sense of place and of history, a sense of self derived from forebears, kin, and culture,” then Webb easily fits the bill—he was after all the author of books like Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America.So the question then becomes: Why has Jim Webb proved such a boringly conventional Democratic senator? Far from being some kind of right-leaning maverick, he has voted with his fellow Democrats in the Senate nearly 90 percent of the time. Were we wrong to ever expect otherwise?
McCain has made it clear his passion is amnesty. Hillary Clinton has made it clear her passion is health care. Expect a president to pursue the issue they identify as their passionate one if they get the chance. What other issue does McCain identify with so deeply?
From UK Guardian article
Durie added that despite his romantic reputation, Robert the Bruce was “an absolute scoundrel”.
“He changed sides five times and would have ended up making Scotland a vassal nation to the English if Edward I had supported his claim to the throne. The first thing he did after taking power was destroy Stirling castle and he was a self-serving, vainglorious opportunist who was determined to be king at any cost.”
Wallace evaded capture by the English until 5 August 1305 when John de Menteith, a Scottish knight loyal to Edward, turned Wallace over to English soldiers at Robroyston near Glasgow. Wallace was transported to London and tried for treason and the execution of civilians and prisoners at Westminster Hall where he was crowned with a garland of oak to suggest that he was the king of outlaws. He responded to the treason charge, “I could not be a traitor to Edward, for I was never his subject.” With this, Wallace asserted that the absent John Balliol was officially his king. Wallace was declared guilty.
Following the trial, on 23 August 1305, Wallace was taken from the hall, stripped naked and dragged through the city at the heels of a horse to the Elms at Smithfield. He was hanged, drawn and quartered — strangled by hanging but released while still alive, emasculated, eviscerated and his bowels burnt before him, beheaded, then cut into four parts. His preserved head was placed on a pike atop London Bridge. It was later joined by the heads of his brothers, John, and Simon Fraser. His limbs were displayed, separately, in Newcastle, Berwick, Stirling, and Aberdeen.
This is what happens when you lose your own country. “John de Menteith, a Scottish knight loyal to Edward” turned in Wallace. Being loyal to Edward in our times translates being loyal to immigration. That is why John McCain is called Juan McCain. Voting for McCain is like voting for John de Menteith. Readers may wish to click on the links above as to what was done to Wallace by the English. The words were implemented literally. Don’t vote for John McCain. Vote for Chuck Baldwin. Insanity is voting for John de Menteith and thinking you won’t end up betrayed like William Wallace.
Human Rights Watch has reported that blacks and Hispanics gang rape white men in prison. Where is the loyalty of society? To PC.
When the John McCains are silent about white men being raped in prison, and only say amnesty and legal immigration, you know where their true loyalty lies. Don’t vote for John de Menteith McCain. John de Menteith was the Scots knight loyal to immigration. So is John McCain. Vote Chuck Baldwin for the Constitution Party for loyalty. John de Menteith and John McCain have both substituted pride in immigration and invasion for loyalty to their people.
John McCain has substituted pride in amnesty for pride in ancestry. Indeed, John McCain would call pride in ancestry as a reason against amnesty as bigotry. That is where his true heart lies, when he calls us bigots. And the reward for bigots in John McCain’s mind is what was done to William Wallace. The rapes by black and Hispanic gangs in prison are what John McCain intends for us.
==
As a boy, McCain had pride of ancestry. As a man, he doesn’t. What changed? The hypothesis that immigration changes rational behavior and morality would explain it. Immigration means McCain won’t have descendants 700 years from now, the time since Robert de Bruce, to look back at him with pride. Instead, genetic replacement will have happened. So McCain has switched his loyalty to the immigrants.
Immigration has changed rational behavior, loyalty and morality. Ending immigration completely is needed to change it back. That is the wisdom America found in 1924. To change loyalty to be internal, we have to prevent family reunification immigration. We have to cut the chain outside. That means under 25,000 per year. The figure of 250,000 per year is the figure of immigration in 1957 when immigration stopped the rise in fertility and started it down. (The pill was not introduced until 1960, after the peak in fertility.)
25,000 per year, including illegal immigration, does send the message that immigration is over. That is the decisive act to change future expectations of immigration replacement. That is what the nation realized in 1924, that a future of immigration replacement means no rationality to loyalty and that the morality of society is no longer controlled by those here.
==McCain may actually be descended from the Menteith family
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.genealogy.medieval/browse_thread/thread/92a6385998975692
|
More options Mar 23, 2:13 am | ||||
Ahhhh… better yet.
I’ve found an ascent for Mary Louise (Earle) McCain to the Menteith family.
Here on OWT
_http://trees.ancestry.com/owt/pedigree.aspx?pid=33054670&st=1_
(http://trees.ancestry.com/owt/pedigree.aspx?pid=33054670&st=1)
==
Menteith, Monteith and Robert the Bruce all on this line:
http://www.countyhistorian.com/cecilweb/index.php?title=Mary_Louise_Earle&printable=yes
There also may be a Menteith Monteith variant in spelling.
Search Menteith John Mccain
So it appears John McCain is descended from the greatest traitor in Scots history, until Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
