Hawaii legal basis test error or fraud Obama birth certificate

The state of Hawaii has a legal basis to investigate and report on whether the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II posted on his website is valid or not. The State of Hawaii has said that only Obama or a family member can request a birth certificate. However, checking for error or fraud in a birth certificate used by Obama to obtain a benefit is something the state of Hawaii can do spontaneously.

The two primary purposes of not letting anyone get anyone’s birth certificate are privacy and to prevent fraud. Since Obama has posted the purported certificate, he has waived privacy. Since the state of Hawaii has already expressed the view that the birth certificate posted on-line lacks the seal and signature that is standard, they have a basis to suspect fraud.

The fraud purpose of the law is so that someone doesn’t get a birth certificate of another person and then use that to get a passport, driver’s license, etc. In this case, the question is whether the Obama campaign are engaged in fraud. So investigating the birth certificate, b.c., in this case is preventing fraud. Moreover, the risk of someone using an Obama b.c. to get a passport or driver’s license or job is already at issue.

Preventing fraud means when there is evidence of fraud its investigated. By not investigating evidence of fraud, the state actually emboldens potential fraudsters to engage in the type of fraud that Obama’s campaign is suspected of by some.

If the b.c. on the Obama website is fake, then there is likely fraud not just error. This is evidence tending in that direction.

The state of Hawaii does not need to prove fraud to correct error. If a b.c. is purported to be authentic in a public manner on a website and it lacks a seal that is a basis for the state of Hawaii to correct error. It has a public interest in doing so. The state of Hawaii has an interest in showing that it polices the use of its b.c.’s and prevents incorrect ones being used to get a job, security clearance, or for some other purpose.

The US government also has standing to investigate the use of a possibly fraudulent birth certificate or one that has errors. The federal elections commission presumably can investigate whether a person is eligible for office or uses documents that contain errors to establish eligibility.

Hawaii has standing to protect its own voters, ballot and those of other states. Voters in other states have standing to request an investigation.

Where there is damage, the state of Hawaii can correct error. The many calls to the office in Hawaii show that the public feels damaged by the possibly false b.c. Damage plus error gives the state standing to investigate and publish its results.

The state of Hawaii is holding a presidential election with other states. It has a duty under the U.S. Constitution and its own constitution and laws to prevent fraud in that election. It has an obligation under the 14th Amendment to prevent election fraud. As an election administrator, the state of Hawaii has an obligation to investigate where evidence of possible fraud, error, or eligibility for office is presented.

The state of Hawaii has already determined that the b.c. on the Obama web page lacks a seal and signature. It also has the word African for race which may be suspect. Note the b.c. was issues after 2001, so that the state of Hawaii may use African at the time the b.c. was printed instead of colored or Negro if those terms were used at the time of issuance in 1961, if one was issued in 1961.

At a certain level of evidence of damage or error, the state of Hawaii has discretion to investigate. At a higher level, it has an obligation to investigate and publish its findings. That level may have been reached. As an administrator of a presidential election operating under the 14th Amendment and with an obligation to other states that are co-administrators of the election including as operators and members of the Electoral College, the state of Hawaii has substantial obligations to voters in its own state, in other states, and to other states.

In the federal system, the states are given duties. Holding elections is one of the duties they are given, including federal elections, including president. They have to see that all laws are enforced in those elections, including what is specified in the U.S. Constitution. Because Hawaii has the b.c. of Barack Obama according to Obama’s web site, it falls to Hawaii to check the b.c.

This is an obligation it has under the U.S. Constitution as an election administrator, and under federal supremacy, and under the Constitution directly to see that Obama meets the requirements written in the U.S. Constitution. When state officials take an oath to the Constitution of the United States, they take on that obligation to make sure that anyone running for president of the United States meets all qualifications in the U.S. Constitution.

Because Hawaii is the alleged holder of the Obama b.c., it has the obligation to check its original. It has that obligation since its own officials have determined that Obama has posted a b.c. on his web page lacking the seal and signature. Hawaii has that duty as a direct duty under the U.S. Constitution. That preempts state law on b.c. privacy.

Others have standing to sue in federal court to get Hawaii to disclose the b.c. based on all the above if Hawaii doesn’t spontaneously investigate this itself. Hawaii should do so. It has the right to and the duty to. That comes directly from the U.S. Constitution. That preempts state law.

Obama by posting a fake b.c. may have engaged in some form of electoral fraud. This accrues as more information is posted. This accrues as his campaign knows the state of Hawaii has stated that the b.c. on the Obama web page lacks the seal and signature. The Obama campaign now has notice that the b.c. on the Obama web page lacks the seal and signature and that the state of Hawaii has said that.

That is additional evidence for the state of Hawaii to act. Its additional evidence for state and federal courts to act. Other state courts have jurisdiction to require Obama to give them a valid Hawaii b.c. So do other state electoral officials. Any state electoral official, local or state, has standing now to challenge Obama on the ballot because the state of Hawaii has said the b.c. on the Obama web page lacks the seal and signature.

Each state of the United States has an obligation to remove Obama from its ballot. This is an obligation under the U.S. Constitution on each state.

Moreover, Obama is not entitled to his delegates at the Democratic National Convention because he is using a b.c. on his web page that the state of Hawaii says lacks the seal and signature. Delegates pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States and most have sworn allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. They have an obligation to deny Obama the nomination while he is using a b.c. determined by the state of Hawaii to lack the seal and signature on his web page.

==

In fighting fraud, it obviously makes no sense to say only the person engaging in possible fraud can request an investigation of the possible fraud. If a state has any information from any source that indicates possible error, fraud, or harm to 3rd parties, that gives it standing to investigate.

A law designed to prevent fraud can not be used to perpetuate a fraud. The law against giving b.c.’s to others is to prevent their using it for fraud. But here the issue is that Obama’s web page may be harming others by error or fraud.

There need not be fraud. The same arguments apply to error. Innocent parties that may be harmed by error have standing to seek correction or confirmation. That is a right they have in state and federal court. The state of Hawaii has a direct obligation under the U.S. Constitution to avoid error or fraud in this case.

The state of Hawaii, other states, and federal courts and agencies have an obligation to weight the costs and harms. The harm of allowing a b.c. that the state of Hawaii has said lacks the signature and seal to be accepted when posted on a candidate’s web page is huge. That undermines the public trust in all b.c.’s everywhere for all purposes. It undermines the rule of law in elections. It perpetuates that candidates are not accountable to the laws before, while and after elected.

Obama has an obligation himself as an elected official and candidate to see that the laws are upheld by his campaign. Using a b.c. that the state of Hawaii has said lacks the seal and signature on his web page is a failure by him. It disqualifies him from being president on a moral level.

==Reference

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12944.htm

A senior official in the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, confirms that the image published and circulated by the Obama campaign as his “birth certificate” lacks the necessary embossed seal and signature. Backing away from a quote attributed to her that the image on the campaign site was “valid,” she told the St. Petersburg (Florida) Times in an article published yesterday: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”

http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12944.htm

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080422061946AAXTd5J

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/

“when the campaign declined to give us one, we were stalled.”

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/21/obamas-birth-certificate-bamboozle-cont/

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/12/what-does-an-authentic-hawaiian-birth-certificate-look-like/

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_antismear_site_relies_o.html

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/daily-kos-an-obama-activist-and-forged-birth-certifications/

http://dailymusings.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!EBAB74DA8F94C559!5351.entry

http://cyrilalmeida.com/2008/04/09/obamas-pakistan-visit/

Obama “birth certificate” Hawaii

Obama Pakistan trip 1981

fake birth certificate.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2036015/posts

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/24/hawaii-vital-records-question-1/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037867/posts?page=140

==Please give to Vdare.com they have a fund raising drive and need money.

http://www.vdare.com/

You can also buy on Amazon from their website link and they get a fee.
==

The above is hypotheses, speculation, or opinion. This is draft and preliminary. This is subject to revision. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate statements as questions. No criticism is made of any person. All other disclaimers apply.