Brit establishment: American Pan 103 victims just typical bigots

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6794382.ece?token=null&offset=12&page=2

Philippe Naughton London Times.

Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi Pan Am 103 Lockerbie bomber may be freed because of cancer.

(Spoof)

Minister for Political Correctness:  Ian Sneed

BBC host of “You are a white bigot”, David Overlordovitch, short form David Ovitch

David Ovitch:  You are having trouble from Americans in releasing Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi.

Sneed:  You know how they are.

David Ovitch: Southern white bigots who think these are still the days of slavery.

Sneed: Exactly.

David Ovitch: I understand that al-Megrahi has cancer and just wants to be with his family.

Sneed:  Everything he did was for his family.

David Ovitch: He might even be innocent.

Sneed: Yes, the trial was under difficult circumstances.

David Ovitch: The Southern white bigots were overbearing and forced a conviction on a reluctant court.

Sneed: Basically.

David Ovitch: A typical Klan type lynching.

Sneed: I am not sure I would go quite that far.

David Ovitch: That’s why the BBC hires me.

Sneed: I suppose.

David Ovitch: So the little Klansters won’t agree to let al-Megrahi out now?

Sneed: They are making it difficult.

David Ovitch: How can they know what its like to be an authentic voice of the resentment of indigenous people?

Sneed: Unless we have walked in their shoes ..

David Ovitch: We can’t judge the shoe bombs they use.  (both laugh)

Sneed: I wouldn’t quite put it that way.

David Ovitch: But the BBC pays me to.

Sneed: I have to be more diplomatic.

David Ovitch: With the American Southern swine.  By the way, do you capitalize the swine in American Southern swine?

Sneed: I wouldn’t.

David Ovitch: It was the Americans who attacked the Libyans in the first place wasn’t it?

Sneed: The Libyans may see it that way.

David Ovitch: They stole their oil.

Sneed: That’s going farther back in history than I want to go.

David Ovitch: Its really the Americans who create the Qaddafis in the first place.  Its their fault.  What do they expect?  Don’t they think indigenous people saw what was happening in Vietnam?

Sneed: It would seem they would put that together, yes.

David: Yes they would.  Yes they can do something about it.  This is the age of Obama now.  These relics from the Ku Klux Klan, you know they have a senator who was in the Klan, did you know that?

Sneed: I believe from one of the Southern states.

David: The swine.  These Americans. They are the worst bigots.  Stupid too.  The man was innocent.  Morally so, if not literally.

Sneed: Americans see guilt in a literal way.

David: Of course the little Klansters do.  Their little minds can’t see it any other way.  Well indigenous people are going to show them.   They are coming.  Even to Westchester County that bastion of white pride and overbearing arrogance.

Sneed: I don’t follow their news in that detail.

David: I do.  The little BNPsters are complaining about public housing coming to their perfect little white schools.  Obama is president now.  Its they who lack a birth certificate in the new world order.

Sneed:  You are going a little fast for me.

David: That’s fine.  You just release al-Megrahi.  I will do the thinking about the new world order.

Chicago Tribune says that Media Matters only targets right

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/horoscopes/sns-200908111354tmsmbazerctnmb-a20090811aug11,0,7741023.story

“Take Media Matters. It’s an organization that honorably subjects itself to listening to and transcribing every hate-filled far-right comment made at any time in America. If you made a hate-filled, far-right comment last night at dinner, check the Media Matters Web site; it should be up there.”

Mark Bazer

Bazer says that Media Matters targets the right.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/horoscopes/sns-200908111354tmsmbazerctnmb-a20090811aug11,0,3095493,comment-display-all.story

Great comments. Some summarize case and facts very well.  Facts the Chicago Tribute should be documenting itself.  One important comment:

Perhaps the Tribune can find out from the Obama Admin why they can’t let America know the name of the Hospital where Obama was born, you know, so the plaque can be placed honoring the birth of the first Black President. Or, it would be nice to know who delivered Obama, like we know all about the births of all of our other Presidents (GWB was delivered by a woman, surely a rarity in 1946 (Dr. Maggie Tyler). So, who delivered Obama and why won’t he tell us? Only President who is hiding his history from Americans. Hmmmm. . . . . .

ElainaVer (08/11/2009, 9:05 PM )

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=105612

Posted: August 03, 2009
9:21 pm Eastern

By Drew Zahn
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

The third president born in a medical facility, George W. Bush, was welcomed into the world in 1946 at the Grave-New Haven Community Hospital – later renamed the Yale-New Haven Hospital – in New Haven, Conn.

No plaques or monuments mark the hospital as Bush’s birthplace, though the communications office does have a 2-page information packet on the birth and the history of the hospital at the time, including a biographical paragraph on the doctor who attended the 43rd president’s birth.

“Margaret (Maggie) Tyler, M.D., delivered the president,” the packet explains. “Dr. Tyler was a member of the New Haven Hospital and then the Grace-New Haven Hospital medical staff in the department of obstetrics and gynecology from about 1922-1949. She served a residency in obstetrics at New Haven Hospital from 1919-21 and joined the staff in 1922 as an associate obstetrician.”

Tom Toles birth certificate death panel cartoon hate and ignorance his

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/opinions/tomtoles/

Tom Toles Birth Certificate and Death Panels Cartoon.  “Cradle to Grave Crazy.”

Political Cartoon below from WaPo shows what they think of us on birth certificate and the death panels.

The reality is we don’t even get a death panel. Foreign and non-white doctors and nurses simply decide we don’t get care.   That just increases under Obama.

The reality is that under Obamacare we have as much chance to find out what is being decided “for” us and make our case on the merits as we do to get the birth certificate.

Those pushing health care by calling us crazy know as little of the details of the health plan as they of the birth certificate.

==

The hate they have of us in this cartoon is the hate that denies us care and lies about it.  Its the hate that doesn’t let us see the 1961 doctor signed birth certificate from Kapiolani Medical Center because it doesn’t exist.       Nor let us see if Stanley Ann Dunham was admitted to Kapiolani as a patient.  She is dead now.  So whether she visited should be public.

Its only useful to conceal Dunham’s records to those who are engaged in fraud.  That fraud comes from the hate of whites shown in the cartoon. That’s the same hate in All in the Family. That’s the hate that let in the terrorists.

That’s the hate that keeps immigration going after immigration is destroying our country.  That’s the hate of ethnic cleansing of whites in Westchester NY that targets the most white areas.

The Washington Post was for release of the tapes when Nixon was president.  Now they ridicule release of the 1961 doctor signed hospital birth certificate from Kapiolani made at the time of Obama’s birth.  This document likely does not exist and never existed.  It might exist.  But more likely it does not.  Obama’s actions show that.

The WaPo showing hate to those who want documents released is the opposite of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  FOIA was about transparency and government openness.  Now WaPo is against that.  WaPo is for race replacement of whites by non-whites.  That is what the health care bill is about as well.

Obama has hate in his heart for whites.  He has shown that his entire adult life.  That is the meaning of his adult life.  Not releasing the birth certificate from Kapiolani if it exists just shows that.  The WaPo enables it.  The health care bill is that.  There are no death panels, just death from Obamacare.   That is the takeaway to remember.

Lee in the Mountains Anglo Celtic blog added to blogroll

http://leeinthemountains.wordpress.com/

This is a great blog from the Anglo-Celtic point of view.

Our people, white Anglo-Celtic Southerners, face cultural
destruction and our demise as a people.

David Frum has dedicated his life to bringing this to them.  Another dedicated to stamping out hate everywhere, i.e. Anglo-Celtic people everywhere is London Times David Aaronovitch who has a piece on stamping out us, i.e. hate, today:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/david_aaronovitch/article6790709.ece

The Wright Island model is math by an Anglo Saxon.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/population-genetics-island-model-one-way-migration/

Wright developed his model after 1920′s immigration restriction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewall_Wright

Lee in the Mountains:

For decades we have
suffered the scorn and abuse of liberal/corporate elites, a
spiritual assault which taken its toll on our morale and
spirit. These elites have used media and education to burden
us with racial guilt and belittle virtually all of our
folkways—in the name, most ironically, of tolerance.

Now the elites are upping the ante. Along with the
continuing psychological assault against the South, they
have unleashed mass Third World immigration against our
region, thereby shrinking our numbers and historic
territories. And it’s not just in places like South Texas
and South Florida. Growing swaths of the interior South,
from Arkansas to North Carolina, have become alien colonies.
This trend is only one thrust of an immigration invasion
which threatens the entire Western world.

Before us lies genocide, our systematic elimination
from the face of the earth. Mass executions need not be the
means.

Wright Island Model:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.  (Nagylaki)

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

To the corporate elites and their spokespress, Anglo Saxon math is hate.  Truth is hate in their world.  A world with no room for us, i.e. no room for hate.

Westchester agrees to ethnic cleansing with feds

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/nyregion/11settle.html?em

“Westchester Agrees to Add Housing in Desegregation Pact
By SAM ROBERTS
Published: August 10, 2009″

“
The overarching goal, though, is to locate them in the least racially integrated neighborhoods.
“

“Brokered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the agreement promises to spark challenges to suburban counties across the country that have resisted pressure to undo decades of residential segregation.”

““Residential segregation underlies virtually every racial disparity in America, from education to jobs to the delivery of health care,” said Craig Gurian, executive director of the Anti-Discrimination Center, which filed the suit under the federal False Claims Act.”

“The case was litigated by Mr. Gurian and the center’s lawyer, John Relman. Their argument that the county had largely ignored local impediments to affordable housing was based, in part, on testimony by Andrew A. Beveridge, a sociologist at Queens College of the City University of New York.”

“Bedford, Bronxville., Eastchester, Hastings-on-Hudson, Harrison, Larchmont, Mamaroneck, New Castle, Pelham Manor and Scarsdale.”

“The federal government deals directly with the cities in the county, among them Yonkers, which nearly went bankrupt before capitulating two years ago in a housing segregation case that dragged on for 27 years.”

Census Map percentage white alone:

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ThematicMapFramesetServlet?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-tm_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_M00627&-ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_&-_lang=en&-format=&-CONTEXT=tm

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ThematicMapFramesetServlet?_bm=y&-_MapEvent=displayBy&-errMsg=&-_useSS=N&-_dBy=795&-redoLog=false&-_zoomLevel=&-tm_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_M00627&-tm_config=|b=50|l=en|t=3307|zf=0.0|ms=thm_def|dw=0.13326557943692616|dh=0.07572412679837512|dt=gov.census.aff.domain.map.EnglishMapExtent|if=gif|cx=-73.8730954147836|cy=40.98475145554878|zl=4|pz=4|bo=|bl=|ft=350:349:335:389:388:332:331|fl=403:381:204:380:369:379:368|g=01000US|ds=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_|sb=47|tud=false|db=050|mn=20.3|mx=98.6|cc=1|cm=1|cn=5|cb=|um=Percent|pr=1|th=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_M00627|sf=N|sg=&-PANEL_ID=tm_result&-_pageY=&-_lang=en&-_pageX=&-geo_id=01000US&-CONTEXT=tm&-_mapY=&-_mapX=&-_latitude=&-format=&-_pan=&-ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_&-_longitude=&-_changeMap=Identify#?262,38

http://www.trulia.com/home_prices/New_York/Westchester_County-heat_map/

Living white alone is a federal crime.  You are targeted.  They have you mapped.  Your home is theirs.  Affordable housing.  Low income housing. Desegregation.  Integration.  White communities targeted.  Non-whites coming.  Welfare coming.  School integration coming.  Blacks and Hispanics are coming.  Feel the love.  Remember you white person, you are hate.  Your hate is targeted.  Because whites living together are full of hate.  That is why they are bringing love to your community.  To your school.  To your children.  Blacks even bring their love to old whites.  They don’t discriminate.  Think of the white farms in South Africa.

The people who live in those homes will be hired by your police and security guard company, issued a gun, and be patrolling your street to comply with licensing regulations and federal law.  And you will be paying for it.  They will be checking out your homes and your kids.  And you won’t be able to do a thing to stop it.

==

If this were based on reason, then they would think that high housing prices show that Westchester is full.  It already has full commuter trains.  They shouldn’t be adding any housing.  That is what logic would say.  But this is based not on logic but on hatred of whites.  This is an agenda of ethnic cleansing of whites by the DOJ.

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/04/lawsuit_will_fo.html

==

Westchester already has blacks and Hispanics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westchester_County,_New_York#Demographics

As of 2000, there were 349,445 housing units at an average density of 807 per square mile (312/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 71.35% White, 14.20% African American, 0.25% Native American, 4.48% Asian, 0.04% Pacific Islander, 6.63% from other races, and 3.05% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 15.61% of the population. 64.1% were Whites of non-Hispanic origin. 71.7% spoke English, 14.4% Spanish, 3.5% Italian, 1.1% Portuguese and 1.1% French as their first language.

By 2006 the population was 68.12% White, 13.91% African-Americans, 5.58% Asian, 0.16 Native American and 12.23% of other or mixed race. 18.54% of the population was Latino or Hispanic of any race.

There were 337,142 households out of which 34.00% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 53.90% were married couples living together, 12.20% had a female householder with no husband present, and 30.20% were non-families. 25.70% of all households were made up of individuals and 10.30% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.67 and the average family size was 3.21.

Guess who has the kids?  Guess the future of Scarsdale schools.  This is a way of life that is going with the wind.  Frankly my dear, the feds don’t give a damn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ7z6hpO57c

WND Jerome Corsi Obama mom at U Wash Aug 19 1961

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106258

Records from Univesity of Washington clearly show Stanley Ann Dunham registered in extension courses, which means night courses in Washington state, starting Aug 19, 1961.  Supposedly Obama was born Aug 4 1961 in Hawaii.

SAD was registed at U Hawaii only for Fall 1960.

SAD was reported to have come with a 7 month old baby when she arrived at U Wash and a woman baby sat for her.

The address given in the newspaper announcements for Aug 4 1961 in Hawaii was owned and lived in by a U Hawaii professor.  6085 Kalanianaole Highway.

6085 Kalanianaole Hwy
Honolulu, HI 96821

maps.google.com

This was owned and occupied from 1958 to the 1970′s by “Orland Scott Lefforge, a University of Hawaii professor, and his wife/companion Thelma Young”.

Obama Sr. had his own apartment the entire time from 1960 to 1962 at a single address at a separate location.  Barack Obama Sr lived at  “625 11th Ave. in Kaimuki, within walking distance of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, where he was enrolled for studies in the fall term 1959.”  He lived there to 1962 when he left for Harvard.

It appears this friendly prof let them use this address for the birth record announcement.

SAD may have had the baby earlier in 1961 in Kenya.  She may have met Obama Sr in the summer of 1960 is a possibility.   The met in Russian class later became a cover story.

SAD is only registered in Fall 1960 at U Hawaii until several years later.

Obama has claimed 4 items of information:

1. Born in Hawaii at Kapiolani Medical Center.
2. Barack Sr his father.
3. SAD his mother.
4. Born August 4, 1961.

Each of these items is of possible importance to determining eligibility for president and fraud and deceit about any one of them is fraud in the inducement to the voters and Congress and the states and voids his election.  He can not get equity, being president, by fraud.  If any of these fact claims by Obama is false, then he has gained the presidency by fraud and his taking the office is void and his acts as president are void.

David Frum: southern whites stupid birthers

http://usjf.net/archives/1319

Drew Zahn
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

In a recent telephone poll conducted by Research 2000 for the website Daily Kos, 58 percent of Republican respondents when asked if Barack Obama was born in the USA answered “no” or “not sure.”

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/08/08/conrad-black-why-america-is-sputtering.aspx

David Frum:

The crazy assertion is that Obama himself was born somewhere other than the United States.

…

The idea is so over-the-line nuts that it has been repudiated even by commentators who are themselves borderline nuts.

…

The white Southern base of the GOP strongly doubts the legality of the 2008 election and the legitimacy of the man elected. They see him as alien, foreign and suspect.

Is this mistrust racial? It sure looks that way. But there’s something else going on too: the trauma of a society adjusting to mass migration, 40-million newcomers since 1970. The people responding to the polls may be thinking: OK, maybe it’s legal for the President’s father to be a non-citizen from Kenya. But it shouldn’t be — the president should have deeper roots in the country than can be sunk in a single generation.

This is immigration Frum supported the whole time and called whites racist to oppose the whole time.

http://www.newmajority.com/davidfrum

Auster on Frum

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008610.html

Frum realizes mass nonwhite immigration is disaster for GOP

Reading a report by Democratic consultant Stanley Greenberg saying that voters under the age of 30 favor the Democrats by a margin of 19 points, David Frum does a shocking thing: he looks at the data in racial terms and draws rational conclusions about them. He finds that young white people actually favor the Republicans by a margin of two points, and that the big GOP disadvantage is to due to a 78 point anti-GOP margin among blacks and a 43 point margin among Hispanics.

Of course, Frum thinks Southrons are morons.  They are easily led and easily fooled in his view.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002325.html

Here is the transcript of the recent Center for Immigration Studies panel on Jews and immigration, featuring Stephen Steinlight, David Frum and Joseph Puder.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1361

==Comment at Vanishing American recently:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295….? ReleaseID=1361

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?

WHITE………….
NoColl Coll BrnAgn
Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Jew

Approve 49% 53% 26% 33% 46% 66%
Disapprove 42 42 65 57 45 30
DK/NA 10 6 9 9 9 4

Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job?

WHITE………….
NoColl Coll BrnAgn
Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Jew

Approve 36% 34% 21% 25% 35% 51%

Disapprove 54 57 70 65 56 41
DK/NA

Born Again Evangelicals disapprove the Dems in Congress and disapprove Obama the most. This disproves the Christians are the problem.

Born Agains and Protestants are also very close.

The two groups poles apart are Born Agains and Jews. BA’s are 26 for to 65 against on Obama or -39. Jews are 66 for to 30 against or +30. Thus BA’s and Jews are 69 points net apart.
The are also opposite in sign and extreme in size in their difference. So they are really two opposite poles among the Q classifications of whites.

On Obama, Jews cluster with Blacks and Hispanics for him. This is more meaningful than Congress on which some groups may think that Congress doesn’t give them enough, and others think Congress gives them too much so they both disapprove.

The idea that its Christians that are the problem is false. The voting analysis in 2008 I think was similar.
Old Atlantic | 08.06.09 – 3:09 pm | #

---

This shows we represent the thinking of our own people. We are not the fringe of our people, we are what our people think. In thinking about coalitions with other groups, we should realize that people from those groups who agree with us are the fringe of those groups.

This is why we should not give up our positions or curb our speech. We have to nail down exactly the situation from our group’s perspective so they can read it and see it in crystal explicit propositions. We should not hang back in fear or sugar coat it or defeat or our own message by hesitation or weasel words.
Old Atlantic | 08.06.09 – 3:20 pm | #

Interesting numbers, OA.
It’s rather reassuring to look at it that way; we aren’t the fringe. The people who have control of the media and government are the fringe.
-VA
Vanishing American | 08.07.09 – 12:00 am | #

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/vanam/6129201662381270796/

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2009/08/those-aggressive-progressives.html

Frum is the Fringe.  A truth whose time has come.

==

http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com/2009/08/david-frum-knows-not-whereof-he-speaks.html

Frum was so busy hating Southern whites and calling them stupid he forgot to ask if Obama ever proved he was eligible to be president by showing his 1961 birth year hospital issued doctor signed birth certificate.

Obama has implied or claimed the following 4 items

1. Obama was born at Kapiolani Medical Center.
2. Obama’s father was Barack H. Obama Sr.
3. Obama’s mother was Stanley Ann Dunham.
4. Obama was born August 4, 1961.

The requirement to be president as a natural born citizen can involve some combo of:

1. Place of birth.
2. Status of father.
3. Status of mother.
4. Date.

The first 3 enter into NBC status and the last one into the age requirement.  If he commits fraud on any one of these 4 items of information he has obstructed the verification of his eligibility.  He doesn’t get to change his story after he is found out as having engaged in fraud.  If he lied or deceived on any element, then he is a fraud and loses by default.  It doesn’t matter if he could have been eligible, if he committed fraud he loses.

Which particular scenario on NBC applies can depend on any of the first 3 items and possibly the 4th. So if he lies on them even though another NBC scenario works with his new story when found out, he defaults.  If he obstructs our verification by lying and by fraud and deceit then he loses.  Receiving equity requires doing equity.  By that standard, failing to release the b.c. and other files by itself disqualifies him in several ways.  A president must show he does equity.  Obama fails on that.

Obama death panels will not listen to you

We are not going to go before Obama death panels for ourselves or our family, because we will not be given even that much due process.  Foreign doctors and nurses will simply decide on rules that mean we don’t get care.  Unless you have 3 babies, you don’t get care type rules.  In any case, the rules won’t matter.  Whites won’t get care.  Its the Sotomayor tribunal that doesn’t even issue an opinion, just an order that you don’t get care.  That is what happened to Frank Ricci, she didn’t even write an opinion, just took away his merit based promotion.

http://unrepentantoldhippie.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/palin-hallucinates-about-obama-death-panel/

Sarah Palin is right about Obama Death Panels.  Ezekiel Emanuel is bringing us the Obamacaust on white people.

Obama Death Panels

1. Don’t have any due process.
2. You don’t get to make your case.
3. You don’t get to challenge the rules of who gets care.
4. You don’t even know the rules.
5. Those who make the rules don’t have to publish them or account for them.
6. Foreign doctors will make the decisions and don’t have to even write down why they decided to deny care.
7. You will never get to see the paper work.
8. You never even know who decided you don’t get care.
9. You don’t know who got the care instead of you.
10. Your family and lawyer can be excluded even when you are sick and weak.

It will be the same lies and stonewalls as with the birth certificate.  They will cite privacy so that your family and lawyer can’t see the paper work on your being denied or delayed care.

==

On August 10, the idea in the above post appears at Andrew Sullivan in an article by Robert Wright but twisting it to mean the current system.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/08/palinapproved-death-panels.html

I had also expressed that idea in comment threads.  In effect, others had too, that Obama’s system would act behind the scenes to terminate white life.

They present the idea as

1. this proves Palin is stupid
2. which to them means whites are stupid
3. which to them means whites have the right to die
4. which to them means whites have the duty to die
5. which to them means non white doctors and nurses and bureaucrats have the duty to terminate whites
6. which to them means that doctors and nurses and judges should be non-white.

They see this as a virtuous circle of the non-white replacing the white as doctors, nurses and judges and then terminating whites so that more non-whites can take their place from internal growth as well as migration.

This illustrates that gays often see themselves as leaders in eliminating the entire traditional society that produced them.   This is particularly true for open gay leaders.  Do they always turn or become militant gay leaders?  Is that the one constancy to Andrew Sullivan?

Dear Senator X, was Obama born at Kapiolani Medical Center?

E-mail your Senator or Congressman and ask them the simple question:

Was Obama born at Kapi’olani Medical Center?

http://www.kapiolani.org/

Dear Senator X,

Was Obama born at Kapi’olani Medical Center?

I have included a link to the hospital webpage.

http://www.kapiolani.org/

Sincerely yours,

Your name.

Dem webpage shows one of the newspaper announcements (Honolulu Advertiser) of Obama’s birth.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132×8530528

Note that the name of the child is not mentioned.  The name of the hospital is not mentioned.

Honolulu Star and Advertiser:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104678

Other questions to ask.

Dear Senator X,

Can you agree with any of the following statements:

Obama was born in Hawaii.

If Obama was not born in Hawaii, then he has committed fraud on the US Senate.

If Obama was not born in Hawaii, then he has committed fraud on me in my capacity as a US Senator..

Obama was born in Hawaii in Honolulu.

Obama was born in Hawaii on the island of Oahu.

Obama was born in the United States.

Obama was born on August 4, 1961.

Obama was born in August of 1961.

Obama was born in 1961.

Barack Hussein Obama II’s father was Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama was never adopted.

Obama was adopted.

Obama became a citizen of Indonesia.

Obama was never a citizen of Indonesia.

Obama was registered at school in Indonesia as a citizen of Indonesia.

Obama had an Indonesian passport.

Obama never had an Indonesian passport.

Obama had an Indonesian identity card showing Obama as a citizen of Indonesia.

Obama never had an Indonesian identity card showing Obama as a citizen of Indonesia.

Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 using an Indonesian passport or identity card.

When Obama returned to the US on that trip, there was no indication on his US passport, if he had one, of his trip to Pakistan.  Thus US Customs didn’t know he had been there and as a consequence didn’t search him or his possessions for drugs.

Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 using only a US passport.

Obama natural born citizen v natural born subject

Leo Donofrio at Natural Born Citizen shows that US legal decisions hold that Obama is a natural born subject of the British crown from birth.  This seeming tie is resolved by looking at original intent and by fact according to the argument below.  We can look to Obama’s actual behavior in fact to see if he exhibits loyalties and entanglements in Kenya and resentments of Britain hostile to the US alliance to Britain from the colonial history of Kenya and Britain.  We in fact find that.  Obama resents Britain’s colonial past and applies that to whites and then acts to harm our link to Britain.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/obama-was-a-natural-born-subject-the-founders-greatest-fear-as-to-commander-in-chief/#comment-8321

Natural Born Citizen v Natural Born Subject.

Tiebreaker:  Original intent is avoid entanglement.

Entanglement in Fact: Obama went to Kenya and was part of Kenya politics in the 2000′s with Odinga, cousin or not.  Obama also dissed the British after becoming president and excluded them at Normandy from some celebration, sent back the Churchill bust, and gave them cheesy insulting gifts.  He also wouldn’t have dinner with Sarkozy on that trip.  France and Britain are our oldest allies and its British law itself we are citing.  We are using our colonial relation to Britain to interpret our laws.  But Obama resents Britain’s colonial relation to Kenya and applies that resentment to disrupt the very tie of Britain to America we are using to interpret our laws.  Obama is not just entangled in Kenya but in a way to want to disrupt our relation with Britain out of his resentments over Kenya being a colony of Britain.  This shows he puts Kenya first.

Where the feared entanglement is shown by the actual conduct of the candidate in question, the tie is resolved that Obama exhibits in fact the divided loyalty feared.  The NBC clause in the Constitution is intended to achieve the result of avoiding entanglement.  Substance over form means the tie is broken that Obama is not NBC because he exhibits the entanglement and divided loyalty and even hostile loyalty that is the original intent to avoid.  Resolution is that Obama is not NBC in fact and is thus not eligible to be US president in fact.

==

Americans exhibit behavior: Because we were Britain’s colony, we apply her laws and concepts.  Those are us.

Obama’s behavior:  Because Kenya was Britain’s colony, he hates and resents Britain.  Obama is showing he does not identify with Britain but hates it. Thus Obama shows he is not us.

By showing his behavior that he is not us, Obama shows he is not a natural born citizen.

==

Americans identify with Britain and British because we are the same stock as them and the same people.

Obama resents Kenya being a colony of Britain because Obama considers Kenyans and British as separate and different people.  Obama considers British colonialism was racism because whites and blacks are different peoples and Obama identifies himself as black.  We consider British colonialism was not racism, because we consider we are the Colonists.  The Constitution was written by the Colonists upon becoming independent.

NBC is about people who are us transmitting us-ness.  This is particularly so in Article II which is about having a Commander in Chief CINC who is us. The original intent was to avoid a CINC who didn’t identify as us but identified with some other country or some other people.

Obama identifies with Kenyans as who he is us.  For Obama, “us” means Kenyan.  Obama is black because of his Kenyan father alone.  Obama identifies with black nationalism becuase of his Kenyan father.  That is the identification the Founders wanted to avoid in a CINC.

Obama even resents us because of what “we” did to “him” and “his” by “our” colonizing Kenya.  For Obama, Kenyans are blacks and are “us”, and we are whites and are “them”.   We are the same as the British because we are white and from British stock.  So he resents us and doesn’t identify with us.  This is what the Founders wanted to avoid in a CINC.

==

When Obama thinks of the relation of Kenya to Britain, Obama thinks of himself as Kenyan
and British as them.  When Obama thinks of Britain by itself, he reverts to this point of view, his resentment as a Kenyan of the British for colonizing his people, the Kenyans.

For us, Britain is the mother country. We show that by interpreting our laws and our Constitution based on British Common Law for centuries past.  We are them.  They are us.

Obama does not think of Britain as the mother country.  Obama thinks of Britain as a hostile colonizing power trying to rule his people, the Kenyans.   This despite being educated at Harvard Law School and teaching Constitutional Law at University of Chicago.

Despite all that, Obama identifies with Kenya as us and Britain as them.  This is not what the president of the US, or CINC, is supposed to feel.  Our courts are applying British law on natural born because they identify us with Britain as our mother country.  We are them.   To Obama, they are the enemy.  That makes us the enemy.  Obama shows that by his black nationalism.

To Obama, his black nationalism in Chicago for 20 years and Kenya’s struggle to throw off British colonialism, are the same thing.  That makes Obama not us and so he can’t be CINC.  The Constitution intends only someone who identifies as us can be CINC.  That rules out someone who identifies Kenyans as us and identifies white Americans as the same as the British and as Obama’s enemies who were tossed out of Kenya.

==

The Left sometimes admits this is part of why they resent this whole discussion or fear it.  They also sometimes celebrate Obama as not being us, white America especially British Americans who are the Founding Stock Americans who they equate with racism for black slavery.  The Left admits at times and celebrates at times that Obama is not us and does not have an identify of being an American in the sense of the Founding Stock who wrote the Constitution and created the country.  That is an identity the Left hates and denies. They deny the Founding Stock created America and that ultimately denies the identity of America as created out of being a British colony and as ultimately British in origin and identity.  They deny America has a British identity or white identity.

==

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/obama-fails-unitary-loyalty-test-to-us/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/common-controversy-standing-to-sue-obama-birth-certificate/