ACLU Eliasberg argues separation must be total

October 7, 2009

Mojave Cross or Secular Cross Case.  Salazar v. Buono, No. 08-472.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/08/us/08scotus.html?hp

Published: October 7, 2009

The question of the meaning of a cross in the context of a war memorial did give rise to one heated exchange, between Justice Scalia and Peter J. Eliasberg, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California, who represents the plaintiff in the case.

Mr. Eliasberg said many Jewish war veterans would not wish to be honored by “the predominant symbol of Christianity,” one that “signifies that Jesus is the son of God and died to redeem mankind for our sins.”

Justice Scalia disagreed, saying “the cross is the most common symbol of the resting place of the dead.”

“What would you have us erect?” Justice Scalia asked. “Some conglomeration of a cross, a Star of David and, you know, a Muslim half moon and star?”

Mr. Eliasberg said he had visited Jewish cemeteries. “There is never a cross on the tombstone of a Jew,” he said, to laughter in the courtroom.

Eliasberg is basically saying the separation he wants is total.  He wants a total separation with Christians.   He intends that to mean the extinction of white Christians.  His basic argument is that Jews here means Christian symbols can’t be here.

http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/26453238/controversial-cross.htm

This case was discussed earlier

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/the-white-race-on-the-cross-of-immigration/

Eliasberg has proven that just as Jews and Christians must be separated in death so they must be separated in life.  In fact, Eliasberg has proven that Jews and Christians must be separated in many ways.

  1. Separated in death.
  2. Separated in memory.
  3. Separated in the sight of God.
  4. In particular Christians and Christian crosses profane and desecreate Jews and everything linked spiritually or physically to a Jew.  Its like some Jews can’t use electricity because its fire.  Eliasberg is saying Jews can’t be linked to the Cross or to Christians that the cross represents.
  5. The cross by its presence desecrates the graves of Jews.
  6. The cross in a Jewish cemetery is the same as pigs digging up their graves.
  7. The cross in the middle of a desert where no Jews are buried or even go desecrates and defiles all Jewish graves everywhere in the same country.
  8. The same applies to any cross anywhere Jews are or might want to go.
  9. The same applies to any thing that symbolizes Christianity even the 10 commandments in a courthouse in a Christian county.
  10. The Christian cross defiles as the Christian defiles food or anything else the Christian touches.  The Christian defiles like a pig.
  11. So do any words of the Christian.
  12. The Christian Cross is unclean.  It is impure.
  13. So is the Christian.
  14. So are the words of the Christian even when from the Old Testament.  When a Christian says them or writes them or displays them, they defile.  This is the case with the 10 commandments in court houses or schools.
  15. The ACLU is going about removing any touch of the Christian anywhere.  This is the Lemkin definition of generalized genocide.
  16. Jews and Christians must be separated in memory.
  17. Separated in honor.
  18. Separated when they pay their respects to the dead.
  19. Separated in how they honor the dead in war.
  20. Separated at birth, since birth is honored by religion.
  21. Separated when they come of age which is marked by religion.
  22. Separated in death which is marked by religion.
  23. Separated in the living memory of those who knew them in life.
  24. The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Future and their Jewish equivalents are fated never to meet.  They are separated forever.
  25. Separated in the meaning of their deaths.
  26. Separated in the meaning of their lives.  The meaning of their lives is tied to their religions and the cross of the Christian which by its presence defiles Jewish memory.  Thus the meaning of their lives must be separate as must the meaning of their deaths.
  27. They can not both die for the same country, because their death is tied to their religion which must be separate.  Therefore the meaning of their death must be separate as well.  Therefore they can not die fighting together as part of the same army.  That means they can’t be part of the same army.  Therefore they can’t be part of the same country.
  28. Again, Christianity’s Cross and all its symbols, words, etc. profane anyone Jewish who comes into contact with them at any moment of life or is reminded of them when they don’t want to be in any moment of life.  That means in school, during a Mel Gibson movie or any other time.
  29. Separation must be total, must be permanent, must be at all times and must be eternal.
  30. This is God’s Will and the Constitution and it is both a religious and secular commandment that the separation be total and complete.

This was the basis of the attacks on Palin including her fifth child.  She defiled the country to be in it to many Jews just by her Christianity and her five children.  The outpouring of hatred of her from Jews especially elite Jews is still going on.   Palin’s presence defiles them to be in the same country with her.

The same applies to birthers.  Their presence defiles America. Because they insist on seeing Obama’s birth certificate with doctor signature, Jews and the ACLU ridicule it and refuse to allow it to happen, even though two lawyers pursuing it are Jewish.  The elite Jews attack the Southern Whites.

The same applies to Virgil Goode.  The same applies to Joe Wilson.  The same applied to Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan.  Anyone who represents us especially if they oppose our genocide even symbolically they consider defiles America and TV by their presence.

The same applies to the Confederate Flag.  Every symbol of us defiles them to be in the same country as them and so is forbidden.  This is their approach to everything to do with us.

Even pure white Christian companies separate from them defiles them to be in the same country as them.  They forbid them to get federal contracts.  What they are doing is generalized genocide.

==Generalized Genocide is what Eliasberg is demanding

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

http://blog.aclu.org/2009/10/06/you-always-wonder-is-there-some-question-i-havent-thought-of/

And anyone who is directly affected by government favoritism of one religion can and should be able to sue, if our constitutional freedom of religion is to mean anything. Otherwise, a Jewish student “offended” by school-sponsored Christian prayers, for example, would have no legal recourse.

==

Thus even one Jewish student has the right to impose his national pattern over that of Christian whites and really its just non-Jewish whites we are talking about.  This is national pattern supremacism.  One of the oppressors group has standing to object to anything in the national pattern of the oppressed group and then it has to go.  Its any one of the oppressor taking offense that matters.  Then out with the national pattern of the FSA’s and in with that of the oppressor’s group.

=

Even a cross in the middle of a desert is too much according to Eliasberg.  This means there is zero tolerance for the Christian or the symbol of him or anything linked to him.   He can not be honored in war even by a cross in the middle of the desert.  This is a powerfully symbolic position to take.  It means separation must be total.  It means even if only God knows about it, its too much.  It means the separation is because God can’t abide to see the cross even in the middle of a desert in the same country as a single Jewish person.

Eliasberg demands the essential destruction of the national group. Eliasberg has argued the case that there must be separation between Jews and non-Jewish whites because Jews can’t stand the national group retaining its essential nature including its religion.  There must be separation between Jews and non-Jewish whites is what he has proven.

This is National Pattern Supremacism.  NPS is Generalized Genocide.  National Pattern Supremacism leads to our being ethnically cleansed from Harvard a university that Founding Stock Americans, Christians, founded out from nothing.

==The ACLU Eliasberg Harvard

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

White minority at HarvardWhite minority at Harvard

(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

==More from Lemkin definition of generalized genocide:

“Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

The elimination of the national pattern of the oppressed group, in this case non Jewish whites, and the substitution of the national pattern of others is what we call generalized genocide.  Generalized genocide is an operator that acts on the state of the system to transform it from the national pattern of one group to that of some other group or coalition of groups.  In this case, the Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews is the supplanting group.  They are effectively dominated by Jews as the data at Harvard shows.  So does the data on the leading pundits, Hollywood, major law firms, ACLU, etc.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/re-%E2%80%9Cthe-atlantic-50%E2%80%9D-pundit-demographics-by-steve-sailer/

Sailer identifies 25 of the leading pundits as Jewish.  They are almost all heavy advocates of legal immigration.

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/09/demographics-of-top-50-pundits.html

The 25 Jewish pundits are advocates of eliminating the national pattern of Founding Stock Americans and of non-Jewish whites just as the ACLU is.  Just as Jewish dominated Harvard is.  Harvard was founded by FSA’s and non Jewish whites.  Now their national pattern is removed there and Harvard used to spearhead its erasure in the entire education system.

==Even at US Naval Academy eliminating the national pattern is the top priority

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/10/07/racial-preferences-at-the-naval-academy/

–All excerpt below:

[Steve Sailer] @ 7:33 pm [Email author[Email this article] [Print this article] [Print this article]

Bruce Fleming, a civilian English professor at Annapolis, has been pointing out how the Navy is corrupting itself in pursuit of Diversity:

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead announced in Annapolis recently that “diversity is the number one priority” at the Naval Academy.

He has a new post up (in hard to read typeface). I liked this comment on Thomas Rick’s blog on Foreign Policy from Geschichtlich:

As a fellow USNA professor, I must concur entirely with Bruce’s assessment. Don’t underestimate the impetus of the Superintendent behind the current policy. The man is committed to gaining a fourth star, and cynically understands that the current course is likely appeal strongly to the current administration.

–end excerpt

==

More from Sailer on eliminating our national pattern (not in those words) and eliminating our genes themselves.

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/090927_wasp.htm

==

It is as if the cross is already off Harvard and now is being erased even in the desert.  The national pattern of Founding Stock Americans is being erased at Harvard.  The national pattern of Christian whites is being erased at Harvard.  The national pattern of whites is being erased at Harvard.  This is generalized genocide.

Boxing up the cross in the desert and taking it down is national pattern supremacism, but the supremacism of a national pattern that is not ours.  Its a national pattern that insists on erasing our national pattern.  That erasing is generalized genocide of whites.

It shows those doing it sense themselves as alien and not part of us.  That is why they insist on the supremacy of their national pattern over ours, even in the middle of a desert.  That is supremacism.  Not even in a desert can we have our cross.  That is erasing our national pattern.

==

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/to-greenspan-stop-immigration-is-the-answer/

The ACLU Solution to the Christian White problem:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

The genocidee has the right to be separated from the genocider.  Jews under the leadership of Eliasberg are genociding whites.  We have the right to be separated from those genociding us.  He doesn’t just intend it, he is succeeding as the Harvard numbers show.

Eliasberg Supremacism doesn’t stop with the cross in the middle of the desert.  It didn’t start there either.  The cross in the middle of the desert being forbidden is almost the end.  Just as the white Christian being ethnically cleansed from Harvard is close to the end.  The Wright Island Model math proves this is the goal.  The information from the census is telling us this is happening.   We are being genocided.

We the genocidee have the right to demand separation from the genocider.  That should be on the basis of the genocider leaving.  He could never have been part of the country given such a belief.  We can tell the belief from the actions as well as the words.  As well as from the outpouring of hate against Palin, Virgil Goode, Joe Wilson, Pat Buchanan, James Watson and all those who symbolize us.  This is genetic based and perpetual hate.   This is why they insist on genocide by immigration even after the evidence is everywhere. That is why there must be separation.

That they won’t agree to stop immigration even as non-whites achieve one majority after another show its intentional to make us a minority.  That is the definition of genocide.  The erasing of our national pattern is part of the definition of genocide.  They won’t stop even as we go down.  That shows its intentional.  It shows it comes from hate.  Even when we are down, they keep hitting us.

They have affirmative action for every non-white including immigrants.  Every non-white comes before every white.  The numbers at Harvard show that. That is what is taught at Harvard.  That is what is taught everywhere.  That is what their case is saying.

We can’t even have a cross in the middle of the desert.  They do it intentionally to symbolize our impotence at our own genocide.  Its symbolic of their erasing our national pattern just as in the definition of genocide.  This is knowing hate that comes from millenia of hate.  They have desired our destruction and now our close to achieving it.

They don’t stop as we go down, instead they rub it in. Even a cross in the desert we can not have.  What more symbol do we need that they are erasing our national pattern and us to zero.

They are telling us they are the master in what was once our house.  The numbers at Harvard show that.  The affirmative action for every non-white immigrant shows that.  They are saying they won’t stop until we and our memory are erased completely. That is what taking down the cross in the middle of the desert symbolizes.

Right now the cross is inside a box by court order.  That is us inside the box by court order.  That is us inside a box in the middle of the desert.  We would defile the air if we breathed it.  They mean to remove us even from inside our box in the middle of the desert.  That is our national pattern inside that box in the middle of the desert.  That is then the end of our national pattern when that box with the cross in it are removed.

Photo of cross in the box with story:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6266291/Mojave-Cross-memorial-to-WWI-dead-violates-first-amendment.html

The difference between a cross in a cracker jack box and the one in the box in the desert is that the cross in the desert is not meant to be taken out but put away, forever.  Just like us.  They are putting away our national pattern forever. That is the definition of generalized genocide.

Photos of the Cross in the Box

http://images.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=cross%20box%20desert%20mojave&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

http://www.faithandaction.org/tag/aclu/

The attack on the cross is an attack on our national pattern.  That is the definition of generalized genocide.  The insistence on immigration and affirmative action for all non-white immigrants but not white immigrants shows that genocide is the aim just as the Wright Island Model says it is.  We the genocidee have the right to separation from the genocider.  We have the right to demand it.  We have the right to insist on it.  If we don’t, our national pattern is erased along with our genes.  The theorem says so.  So do those doing this to us.

==

Our national pattern and our genes are both being eliminated and replaced in California.  See Patrick Cleburne discuss this.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/10/05/who-killed-california-the-neocons/

But faced with the lethal threat of inundation by economically low quality Hispanics, Californians reacted wisely. They were robbed of the fruits of that wisdom by Neoconservatives, who proceeded to block reconsideration at the State or Federal level for almost a generation.

The problem is still here – only massively worse. No wonder they don’t want to talk about it.

California was settled by Founding Stock Americans who built great universities to rival Harvard like Berkeley and Stanford.  There too, they are being replaced along with their national pattern.

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5.  The 20 percent Jewish at Stanford is not in the following list but is a reasonable estimate.  The result is the same whatever number within reason is used as a plug.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

http://collegeprowler.com/uc-berkeley/diversity/

Whites at Berkeley are 31 percent.  That includes Jews.  Take out 20 percent and you are down to 11 percent like Stanford.  This is a university founded and made great by non Jewish whites from nothing.

http://berkeley.edu/about/fact.shtml#freshman

70% have at least one parent born outside the U.S. (2008)

Living alumni: 431,500 (August 2009)

http://metrics.vcbf.berkeley.edu/Berkeley%20Template.pdf

Race/Ethnicity

Counts for the Fall 2003 entering class shown in the graph above:

Total 24,636

African American / Black 841 3%
American Indian / Alaskan Native 126 1%
Asian / Pacific Islander 10,272 42%

Hispanic 2,839 12%

White 7,755 31% •

Race/Ethnicity Unknown 2,017 8%

Total Citizens and Immigrants 23,850 97%

International 786 3%

==

http://www.oid.ucla.edu/publications/teachersguide/policies/universitycontext/index.html

Ethnic minorities constitute over one half of the undergraduate student population. As of Fall 2006, the UCLA undergraduate student body, excluding transfer students, was 44% Asian American, 31% White, 13% Chicano/Latino, 2% African American, less than 1% Native American, 3% International, and 7% Other/Unknown.

==

The Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews is eliminating whites from the universities whites founded.  Note the 31 percent number for whites.  It was 31.5 percent white at Stanford and 31 percent white at Berkeley.  That is before subtracting out Jews.  Once that is done one is down to under 20 percent whites, likely 10 percent whites.  Harvard was 48 percent white gross minus 31 percent Jewish for 17 percent white net.

The Slicer Coalition is blacks and Hispanics taking off the bottom and Jews and Asians off the top.  Jews are left in control by verbal dominance and their networking skills and group cohesion.  They bully the others and thus control the coalition.  Thus Jews have replaced whites at the elite schools in terms of control.  They erase the national pattern of whites and replace it with that of their own.  The removal of the cross in the Mojave desert, now on the way out of California for whites, symbolizes this complete erasing of the national pattern of whites.

This is why we have the right to separation from blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews. They are erasing our national pattern. That is generalized genocide.  That is followed by imposing their pattern.  That is followed by their replacing our genes by their own coalition.  That is guaranteed by new immigration according to the Wright Island Model and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

Since Asians and Jews tell us they are smarter than us at math they must know that our extinction by immigration is a math theorem before we do.  (Even though its named for a white.) Thus erasing our national pattern is intentional for them to erase our genes as well.  That is why we have the right to be separated from this coalition that is genociding us.

They won’t stop as long as they are in the same country.  Their national pattern doesn’t allow them to let us exist.  Their coalition insists on the complete erasure of our national pattern and us by continued immigration and the other abuses.  This is why we have the right to separation from them.  The genocidee has the right to separate from the genocider.

Their rhetoric is absolute.  They insist on their priority over us.  Every non-white immigrant gets affirmative action over every white.  Every white, immigrant or not does not.  This is stark genocide.  Whites have longer and harder searches for jobs and promotions because of this statistical pattern.  This is particularly true since whites are a minority.

The Slicer Coalition dominates the elite universities.  Those are their clubs.  They control the fast track in government, industry and education because the fast track is hired from elite schools.   Thus they are the elite establishment with a priority to hire only their own.  This is replacing our national pattern by theirs.  This is replacing us by them.

The old rationale for affirmative action was the elite schools and fast track jobs were controlled by whites.  Now that this is no longer true they still keep affirmative action as a requirement.  This shows genocide is their goal.  Its not making up for whites dominating elite schools and thus the fast track at companies and government who decide who to hire from non-elite schools.

Now its they are the insiders at elite schools with a mandate to hire non-whites first.  Eric Holder is Attorney General and says laws don’t protect whites.  That’s what it means.  When the law is specifically against whites on hiring and on hate crimes, it sends a message that law doesn’t protect whites.  The Slicer Coalition are the ones to be judges and prosecutors.  They choose who to protect and who to prosecute.  They are showing its not whites.  They are replacing our national pattern and our genes as fast as they can.  This is why we have the right to complete separation from them.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/pbs-the-extraordinary-journey-celebrates-ethnic-cleansing/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/john-hennessy-stanford-ethnically-cleanses-whites/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojave_Desert

The Mojave was crossed by FSA’s on their way in.  Now they cross it on their way out. The ACLU is telling Founding Stock Americans fleeing California, take your World War One cross on the way out of California.  No national pattern of FSA’s is to be left in California.  California had vets in World War One.  It was a paradise then for FSA’s to live in.  It was their and our national pattern there.  Now its being erased and replaced by that of the oppressor coalition.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/tom-friedman-you-are-not-part-of-we/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/population-genetics-island-model-one-way-migration/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/detroit-the-body-of-cities/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-big-schlei-1965-immigration-act/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/roman-polanski-leopold-loeb-schumer-schlei/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/re-goldberg-fox-tea-parties-represent-america-pre-ethnic-cleansing/

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

Assume the population is bounded from above.  If there is a group of immigrants whose annual inflow is bounded from below and such that a multiple of the genetic survival factor of each year’s inflow bounds that of any other annual cohort (here or flowing in) then the genetic survival factor of every cohort and thus every gene asymptotes to zero.

One can think of each gene as getting a base serial number and bequeathing that base serial number to its daughter genes and adding the date of creation.  A gene crossing the border gets a new base serial number in sequence of base serial numbers and the date of crossing.  Thus any gene’s serial number consists of its base and all the creation dates in its lineage from start date for those here already as of that date or its border crossing date.  In this case, every base serial number eventually goes extinct from immigration.

This is the mathematical genocide of every gene.  We don’t survive in a mixture. Each individual serial number of us goes extinct.  Just like our cross in the box.  Our DNA numbers are in the same box.  They go with our cross.  Just like the definition of generalized genocide says.  Erasing the national pattern is how genocide of the serial numbers of our DNA is done.

Take away our pattern and then eliminate our genes.  The Harvard diagram shows its happening.  We see it every day. We see it at the hospital when we die. We see it when our few little ones are born.  We are dwindling.  Our national pattern is being erased.  This is intentional.  They don’t let up as we go down, instead even a cross in the middle of the desert has to go.  That is just like our last DNA serial number has to go by more immigration.

The cross was put  there in 1934 by the living veterans of World War I.  They chose the cross to symbolize our national pattern as it was in that war.   They were not Buddhists.  Its defiling their memory to put up something else.  Its defiling their memory to take down the cross.  Putting up something else or taking down the cross are both taking away our national pattern.  That is generalized genocide.  That leads to the genocide of every gene of every serial number on our DNA.

The Slicer Coalition is inherently genocidal towards whites.  Their leaders are demanding removing the cross in the Mojave as whites flee across the Mojave from California.  This is symbolic of the Lemkin definition of generalized genocide.

==Repeat  from Lemkin definition of generalized genocide:

“Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

Repeat from Wright Island Model

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

We have the right to separation from those genociding us.  The genocidee has the right to ask for separation from the genocider.   We who can see this have the duty to demand it.

==

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/24/style/weddings-catherine-dent-peter-eliasberg.html

The bridegroom is the managing attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, in Los Angeles. He graduated magna cum laude from Yale and Harvard Law School and was a law clerk for Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Los Angeles. Judge Reinhardt participated in the ceremony.

The bridegroom is the son of Ann Pringle-Harris and Jay Eliasberg, both of New York. His mother is a freelance newspaper and magazine writer. His father retired as the vice president for audience research in the broadcast group at CBS in New York.

Since Eliasberg is magna cum laude from Yale and Harvard Law School he is smarter than us.  So we could hypothesize he already knows the math of the Wright Island Model and the Lemkin definition of generalized genocide.  Since his father was a Vice President at CBS, we can hypothesize that he is better informed and has known this his whole life.

We can also hypothesize that he is aware of non-Jewish whites being almost eliminated from Harvard.  Those hypotheses would imply he has dedicated his life to erasing the national pattern of Founding Stock Americans and to their complete genetic extinction by immigration.  This would imply he knows we are down but he keeps on hitting us while we are down.  He does it to show us who is master in what was once our own house.  He takes away our cross to finish the erasing of our national pattern.  He does it as part of the pattern of Harvard being turned against us to erase our national pattern.

==

The above is draft and preliminary.  These are hypotheses and speculation.  Comments and corrections welcome.   This is not meant to disparage any person.  Please restate all statements as questions or hypotheses.  All other disclaimers apply.

2 Responses to “ACLU Eliasberg argues separation must be total”

  1. Eloise Says:

    We stumbled over here by a different page and thought I might
    check things out. I like what I see so i am just following
    you. Look forward to looking into your web page again.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: