Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Barack Hussein Obama agreed that the Muslim population in the US was too dangerous to hold a trial in New York. Both support more Muslim immigration but agree on holding the trial somewhere where the cost of containing Muslim violence will be lower. So why won’t the Muslims make their attack in New York City anyhow? If that’s where the payoff is, why go to the courthouse when they can go to the Wall Street counting house or the White House?
Lower Manhattan is too vulnerable a target to protect during the trial. So hold the trial somewhere else and let the attack come in Lower Manhattan without any money spent for security there. This is liberal hit me where it counts stupid.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015547.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/nyregion/30trial.html?hp=&pagewanted=all
U.S. Drops Plan for a 9/11 Trial in New York CityBy SCOTT SHANE and BENJAMIN WEISERPublished: January 29, 2010
The Obama administration on Friday gave up on its plan to try the Sept. 11 plotters in Lower Manhattan, bowing to almost unanimous pressure from New York officials and business leaders to move the terrorism trial elsewhere.
The Feds and New York cops have said they can’t defend Lower Manhattan from terrorist attacks without a billion dollars. So they hold the trial somewhere else. But the attack will still come in Lower Manhattan. This is another test in common sense which is a hate crime under liberalism.
WaPo covers the move as well.
Obviously, I have no inside information on where or whether an attack will come. This is speculation and hypotheses. All other disclaimers apply.
