Mass Brown over Coakley shows GOP wrong on non-white immigration

The defeat by Scott Brown of Martha Coakley by 52 to 47 shows again how stupid the GOP is to seek voter replacement of whites by non-whites.  It was white votes that elected Brown, not non-white votes.

Steve Sailer on the Sailer Strategy with an Asian focus

http://vdare.com/Sailer/091011_asians.htm

Asians are becoming another intelligent minority that is anti-white.  They thus reinforce Jews in that role.  This was likely the original Jewish idea in supporting Asian students at universities where Jewish faculty pushed for this.

The search Sailer strategy brings up interesting hits.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Sailer+strategy&aq=f&aql=&aqi=&oq=&fp=e8d6ef47431c6a4a

http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/090920_2050.htm

Whites need a country of their own.  That means kicking non-whites out of this one or splitting it and getting a whites only portion.  That could then lead to taking back the rest.  We must keep the nuclear weapons and other infrastructure.  So if did do a push out of the non-whites, then one is to take the lower part of California and lower part of Texas and make those for non-whites.  All Hispanics and blacks and most others would go there.  If they then wanted to go back to their home countries then that is where they can leave from.  There might also be small zones such as parts of Detroit, the South Side of Chicago, etc. as a temporary set of non-white zones.

Given the enforcement problem though, it would be better to simply send the Hispanics into Northern Mexico and keep the current USA borders.   But we might retain a strip on the Rio Grande to limit immigration into the ersatz southern edge zones.  These need not be contiguous or cover the entire border.   These might be dot zones at intervals.

The above are hypotheses and are meant for discussion purposes only.  This is draft and preliminary and subject to revision.  All other disclaimers apply.

France orders US out of Haiti

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/haiti/7020908/US-accused-of-occupying-Haiti-as-troops-flood-in.html

President Sarkozy gave a news conference in Paris.

Sarkozy:  France has a zone of influence in Haiti.  The American occupation is an affront to France.  Therefore I order the Americans out.

Fred the unShred:   Won’t that lead to chaos?

Sarkozy: America spreads chaos wherever it goes.  Look at Iraq.

Fred: American casualties were zero for a month for the first time.

Sarkozy: That is American.  You destabilized the Middle East.

Fred: Not safe for nail board wielding sheiks?

Sarkozy:  I am not here to debate Iraq but Haiti.  We can not tolerate an American occupation of Haiti.   They must go.

Fred: And bring back all the Haitians in America too?

Sarkozy: Of course.  Haiti is their country.

Fred: But won’t there be chaos in Haiti?

Sarkozy:  They are free to choose.

Fred: Like the 100 car burnings a month.

Sarkozy: Who tells you cars are still burned in France?

Fred: Search cars burned France.

Sarkozy: I do not do searches in English.

Fred: Well try voitures flambées  France or voitures brûlées  France.

Alors que l’année 2005, marquée par les trois semaines d’émeutes dans les banlieues, avait été qualifiée d’exceptionnelle (45 588 véhicules incendiés, dont 10 000 pendant les émeutes), la tendance est restée globalement défavorable, très loin des statistiques évoquées en 1999 par le chef de l’Etat. Encore 44 157 voitures brûlées en 2006, 46 814 en 2007, un peu plus de 40 496 en 2008 et probablement plus de 40 000 en 2009, si on en croit les premiers chiffres rapportés par Le Figaro.

http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2010/01/05/en-une-decennie-le-phenomene-des-voitures-brulees-s-est-etendu-et-banalise_1287638_3224.html

Sarkozy: I do not believe in Le Figaro.

Fred: Looks like Haiti is in France already.   By the way, 365 days times 100 per day is 36,500.  So its over 100 per night in France that are burned.

Al Franken v Jim Webb on whether white votes count

Al Franken says the (white) voters of Massachusetts voting against Kennedy health care don’t count.  He will pass it over their opposition.

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/01/19/franken-confident-about-health-care-bill/

Jim Webb says the votes do count and that they can’t use gimmicks to pass health care when the voters are against it.  Specifically, the voters of Massachusetts get to vote on health care by their chosen person not someone chosen by party insiders, Paul Kirk.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/01/19/webb-no-health-care-action-until-brown-is-seated/

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0110/On_to_Plan_C.html

By voting for Scott Brown and against Martha Coakley voters of Massachusetts voted against health care reform, amnesty, Haitian refugees, Barack Hussein Obama II, the hiding of the birth certificate, the hiding of the school records of dual citizenship, the bailouts of the banks, the spendthrift stimulus, the Bernanke reappointment, Geithner and Summers and the Democratic Party’s platform of race replacement of whites by non-white immigration and affirmative action.

Al Franken’s approach is the same as Norbert Schlei.  He is against us and doesn’t care what the votes are.  He takes his chance to destroy us when he has it.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-big-schlei-1965-immigration-act/

David Axelrod and Obama agree, white votes don’t count on health care.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31693.html

White House senior adviser David Axelrod told POLITICO: “I think that it would a terrible mistake to walk away now. If we don’t pass the bill, all we have is the stigma of a caricature that was put on it. That would be the worst result for everybody who has supported this bill.” He said the administration will work with Capitol Hill to figure out how.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31693.html#ixzz0d9stqU96

Obama Voodoo Panels set up in Haiti

White House.  Robert Gibbs enters to brief the press.

Fred the Unshred:   I hear that Obama is setting up Voodoo panels in Haiti.

Gibbs: Is that in the new Palin book or did you hear it on Fox?

Fred:  This is solid reporting.  Its coming from DHV.

Gibbs: DHV?

Fred: Department of Homeland Voodoo.

Gibbs: There is no such deparment.

Fred: Look at the little government phone book.

Gibbs: There is no little government phone book.

Fred: Well, the big one.

Gibbs:  DHV.  It really exists. Department of Homeland Voodoo.  How did that get there?

Fred:  Some Haitian spell if you ask around.

Gibbs: This is the Obama House.

Fred:  Department of Hussein Voodoo?   Department of Haiti Security.  Do you see those?

Gibbs: They are in there.  This is an April Fool’s joke.

Fred: Its not April.

Gibbs: So what gives?

…

Fade out and we hear:

Gibbs is in the Obamazone.  The Haitian earthquake ripped a hole in time.  Now Haiti rules Obama’s destiny.

Gresham’s Law of Race Replacement, bad people drive out good Haiti

A few days ago this blog discussed the proposition that libs create Haitis all over the place to displace whites.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/libs-created-haitis-all-over-to-displace-whites/

In a brilliant article, Steve Sailer provides some ammunition to support this view at least in part.

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/100117_haiti.htm

Haiti’s Malthusian poverty is the default state of mankind. Its rapidly growing population is kept fed by the more than 10,000 foreign charitable organizations active in the country.

Virginia Dean Abernathy has pointed out studies that show that aid increases fertility and the increasing percentage of non-whites flows from aid.

http://www.virginiaabernethy.com/publish.php

In particular, “The Demographic Transition Revisited: Lessons for Foreign Aid and US Immigration Policy.”

http://www.virginiaabernethy.com/publishdetail.php?publishid=22

Sailer shows however that Haiti has had a reverse policy of good people driving out bad, by promoting European immigration and deporting illegal Haitians.

Haitians to get Obamacare

Obama has legalized Haitians “temporarily”.  Patrick Cleburne deconstructs this at Vdare.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/01/16/obamas-hatian-aid-amnesty-and-more-immigration/

True to the war-cry of White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, the Obama administration is not letting the Haitian crisis go to waste. It has seized the opportunity to grant amnesty to the substantial quantity of illegal Haitian immigrants in this country, including those already caught and slated for deportation.

Patrick Cleburne also has done research and found that the Dominican Republic is keeping Haitians out.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/01/17/wiser-than-america-neighboring-dominicans-refuse-haitian-influx/

This exercise in public-policy-as-emotional-catharsis will inevitably lead to a huge increase in the highly dysfunctional and violent Haitian community in America.

Putting it all together, Obama is going to extend Obamacare to Haitians in this country and many more he brings here.   That means care we don’t get.

Search on Haitians Obamacare.

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=Haitians++Obamacare&btnG=Google+Search

Obama is not letting this crisis go to waste, he is  using it to dispossess whites in the tradition of mulattos in Haiti.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

“the slaves killed 2,000 whites”

Haiti “mulatto uprising”

http://www.google.com/search?q=+Haiti+%22mulatto+uprising%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=iOW&num=100&sa=2

One in 1799 and 1806.  The Haitians killed the mulattoes.

A good review of the history of Haiti’s revolution and the killing of whites and mulattoes is by James P. Lubinskas, American Renaissance, April 2001, “The Revolution in Haiti”.

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/01/the_revolution_1.php

With the defeat of the whites, mulattos expected to rule in their place, exploiting the labor of black slaves, but the blacks, led by General Pierre Dominique Toussaint L’Ouverture (1743–1803) and supported by the French government, rose up against the mulattos. Badly outnumbered and without allies, “the yellow caste” soon met the same fate as the whites. L’Ouverture and his troops slaughtered them by the thousand.

…

Dessalines, who crowned himself Emperor Jacques I, wanted to break all ties with France. One symbolic step was to change the name of the colony to Haiti, which is what the Arawaks called the island. He guaranteed safety to whites who remained, and even encouraged more to come, but this was a ruse. In early 1805, he ordered their extermination. A French officer who escaped described the carnage:

“The murder of the whites in detail began at Port-au-Prince in the first days of January [1805], but on the 17th and 18th of March they were finished off en masse. All, without exception, have been massacred, down to the very women and children. . . .”

With this final slaughter, French San Domingo vanished from history and the black nation of Haiti arrived.

Africa in the New World

Haiti was the second nation in the Western Hemisphere—after the United States—to gain independence, and Haitians will officially mark their bicentennial in 2004. It is unlikely that even Afrocentric blacks will celebrate this milestone with much enthusiasm. After 200 years of black rule there is little of which to boast. A United Nations report says Haiti may soon be incapable of supporting human life.

…

Of course, we need not look as far as Haiti to understand the link between race and civilization, and what it means for America. Haiti is nothing more than Camden or East St. Louis writ large, and without the surrounding white society to support it. Africans remake Africa wherever they may go.

(hat tip http://www.nationofcowards.us/)

There is a comment thread above at Amren on the article.  The article in another format is also here:

http://www.amren.com/ar/2001/04/index.html#cover

Jewish right to Israel Morality of Consequences

One of the arguments for the Jewish right to Israel is that they have done more with it than the Arabs have done with their lands.   They can point to their achievements, including Nobel Prizes, etc. and say they have a superior right to the land over the Arabs because they are superior and have done more with it.  This argument is made from time to time.  What are we to make of it?

Suppose we nullify it.  Civilizational aptitude has no bearing at all in the right to a land.    In that case, the worst of the earth have as much right to land as the best.  This is what liberals say while partly denying the worst of the earth are in fact the worst.

If mankind is to have a future that is upward then civilizational aptitude must count.  The consequences of who has a land for present and future generations must count.  The alternative is to give up discrimination and descend into chaos.  The worst will then take over if the good have to just stand by and let them.  This is the road to end the civilization of the West as we know it and descend into barbarism.  In that case, the strong will emerge and impose their will.

So we come back to who the people are is fundamental to their claim.  The consequences of the allocation of the land matters.  If the consequence is civilization destruction, then its immoral.  If its civilization enabling then its moral over civilization destruction.

Non-white immigration into America, Canada, Europe,  and Australia has the consequence to degrade and extinguish the greatest civilization and race that mankind has seen.  Whites are the very source of the moral insights that liberal whites so admire.  The non-whites in their coalition are motivated by greed, envy, and hate.

Whites have a moral right to keep their lands.  That means sending the non-whites out of them.   This flows from the morality of consequences.  The morality of an action or non-action is based on the consequences of the action or non-action.

The destruction of the white race and its civilization is a negative outcome.  This must not be allowed to happen.  So non-whites must leave all Western lands, with a few minor exceptions.

False Driver ID is a weapon of mass destruction

Brenda Walker points out that a false driver’s id got two of the terrorists onto planes that she points out they used as weapons of mass destruction.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/01/16/this-just-in-from-the-ivory-tower/

Thus their false driver’s ids are weapons of mass destruction or at least an auxiliary to WMD.  Why don’t they ask Vahid Majidi head of FBI WMD, a native born Muslim like Obama, but born in Iran unlike Obama.

Libs created Haitis all over to displace whites

Libs have a common plan or method to displace whites by increasing the non-white population everywhere.  The Wright Island Model proves this common plan or method.  The form most suited to this analysis is the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

Non-whites increase above replacement while whites don’t.  Eventually non-whites displace whites completely.  The survival factor of white genes asymptotes to zero.

Its a common plan or method for libs to create Mexifornia, Haiti, Egypt, Nigeria, Indonesia, etc.  They intentionally spend their resources on operations whose sole purpose is to increase the number of people living on a dollar a day.  This is the lib plan.

Eventually bad people drive out good.   This is the liberal version of Gresham’s Law.  Gresham’s Law of Race Replacement, bad people drive out good.

As a side effect, the huge number of dollar a day people the liberals intentionally bred results in their overpopulating the earth.  Thus they live in marginal places like Haiti and other trouble spots.  When disaster strikes, the libs dollar a day people go down in droves.  The libs don’t really care.  Its just a chance to drain more resources from whites and thus substitute for whites with non-whites.

Libs have created an oversupply of dollar a day non-whites.  This is a permanent force to displace whites.  These people will die in misery in large numbers anyhow under the lib  plan.  That is built into their overpopulation strategy.

This is an extension of the Trotsky racism strategy.  They simply over produce dollar a day non-whites and the whites disappear from substitution pressure.  Spending resources on Haiti is part of that common plan or method of libs.

Martha Coakley Prosecutor Charisma

Lawrence Auster on Coakley’s mien not working for her.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015357.html

Disdain for the white working class is the Kennedy way today.   Doesn’t seem to be working.  The Massachusetts establishment has one policy for working class whites, dispossession and race replacement.  That comes across in the look of disdain the establishment has for the people.   Hate shows itself.  Racial dispossession is hate.  The program of hate is showing the looks of hate.

Obama giving Hillary the finger:

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Obama+Hillary+finger&aq=f&aqi=g10&oq=&fp=df82d86320cf60e9

The white working class is picking up on the hate.  The Democrats can’t hide the hate forever.  It comes out.  The whole Democratic program is hate of the white working class.  That also includes the white working class.  Non-Jewish whites are 20 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Hard to hide that.

===Following from

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/generalized-genocide/raphael-lemkin/

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

White minority at Harvard

(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

==

Racial dispossession of whites is the Democratic program in Massachusetts.  That fact is obvious in every way.  Whites who want government jobs may be thinking the Steve Sailer way, that Democrats are against whites getting government jobs, one of the last refuges of the middle class.