Philly Fight Night: Dems Spar Over Electability
Dems Last Chance to Settle Scores Before Pennsylvania Primary
By NITYA VENKATARAMAN
April 17, 2008
Debate Gets ‘Bitter’
Obama defended recent remarks at a San Francisco frundraiser where he characterized small town voters as “bitter” saying they “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them …as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Obama said “that, when people feel like Washington’s not listening to them … then, politically, they end up focusing on those things that are constant, like religion.
“They end up being much more concerned about votes around things like guns, where traditions have been passed on from generation to generation,” Obama said.
Clinton said she understood why people were “taken aback” and “offended” by Obama’s remarks.
Obama asked about his pastor Rev Wright’s remarks:
Full debate video:
These were good questions by ABC. Obama has shirked and skirted the truth on his past. ABC’s mistake was going half way. They should have studied the details of all Obama’s statements and pointed out the inconsistencies. If ABC had scored clean hits on Obama, no one would be saying they had bad questions. They just didn’t get into enough details and inconsistencies in Obama’s statements.
ABC should have read over the Steve Sailer columns more times to get
down the Obama inconsistencies.
search Steve Sailer Obama Wright
The reason the left is upset over ABC questions is that they make the point that the Democrats are an anti-white racist party that has no answers for middle class and working class people. The Democrats offer hate as a platform. That is what the left hates to have exposed.
In Pa. Debate, The Clear Loser Is ABC
By Tom Shales
Thursday, April 17, 2008; Page C01
ABC News, which hosted the debate from Philadelphia and whose usually dependable anchors, Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, turned in shoddy, despicable performances.
Because ABC asked Obama about calling working class whites, in effect, bitter troglodytes, Shales gets unhinged. This is because Shales despises working class whites. Shales can’t admit he is biologically connected to working class whites who he regards as subhuman. This is why he goes crazy when ABC a major news organization asks Obama about this.
The entire left liberal spectrum of hate was on display in the attacks on ABC. They were attacking Charlie and George for betraying the left by asking these questions. This was a betrayal at the DNA level. Because the left is in denial that its white or that its from the same stock as the white working class. This is the ultimate put down to a person on the left, especially at WaPo, to be told they are just the same as white working class pretending to be sophisticated by betraying their own people.
This is the part in particular that Shales is going cracy over and the rest of the left. Obama exposed that they do betray the white working class and do try to distance themselves from it precisely by their betrayal of it. By betraying the white working class, the left proves its different and superior. Obama’s marks lifted the veil on this practice. Its Shales and the others attacking ABC who are despicable.
The UK Guardian has betrayed working class whites in the UK the same way. Their hatred of BNP is precisely the same as Obama’s hatred of working class whites revealed in the bitter comment.
== Huffington Post
The left hates being exposed. This is as bad for them as the Stalin show trials or the Hitler Stalin Pact. It shows who they really are and what their real intentions are.
What a contrast. Only a few weeks ago, we were presented with what was considered by many to be a historic speech by a presidential candidate on race in America — historic for its substance, tone, delivery, and stark candor.
Obama said whites are racist, in effect repeating what Rev Wright said in different words. That is the problem. The bitter comments came after this speech and showed that is precisely what Obama and the left think of working class whites.
So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Those are words of hate. That is the hate the left has for working class whites around the world. Its from the UK Guardian to WaPo. These words exposed the real hatred of the left towards whites. This is where the genocide by immigration comes from. This hate.
Obama on Charlie Rose in 2004 on working class Americans:
This turns into the bitter remark in 2008:
Or it shows what he thought all along. What the left thought all along.
Pat Buchanan on Obama’s bitter comments.
Tavis Smiley had a show where he commented on this article by Pat. This is the worst to the left. Buchanan the defender of the white working class (WWC) is shown to be right and shown to be the one who was for the white working class all along. The Democrats and left are exposed as the enemy of the white working class all along. They want to genocide the WWC by immigration. They hate the WWC.
This the left can’t stand. This is why they can’t stand ABC continuing the story. ABC is supposed to be part of the left. Asking more about it is a betrayal of the left. This is why the left is raining down hate on ABC. The comments make no sense, they are pure hate.
When does the left bring up that men’s median wages are the same as in 1973 even though productivity doubled?
The graph on page 16 shows men’s median wages the same as 1973 and that women’s median wages stopped converging towards men in 1990. But productivity has gone up 50 percent since 1990. But men and women’s median have not budged since 1990, but immigration has been huge since 1990. Women’s labor force participation rates stopped increasing much from 1990, so women in the labor force doesn’t explain the median wage data since 1990, but immigration does.
These graphs are never shown on debates. Why don’t the left get angry that the graph isn’t asked about? Because that is the real question the same as the Obama bitter question. It shows the left is not on the side of the white working class, but has hurt them and is wiping them out by immigration. That is why they turn on ABC for still asking about Bittergate. That is why it is Bittergate. This exposes the hate in the left for the white working class. That is what Bittergate is.