Panel May Have Few Good Options to Offer
Bipartisan Group’s Plan Expected in Dec.
By Michael Abramowitz and Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 12, 2006; Page A01
“After meeting with President Bush tomorrow, a panel of prestigious Americans will begin deliberations to chart a new course on Iraq, with the goal of stabilizing the country with a different U.S. strategy and possibly the withdrawal of troops.”
Many good comments above. Basically, the study group is pretending we are at war with Iraq and nothing else. This is the Religion of Peace PC. It means we can’t talk about anything.
Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan are free to fund insurgencies against us in Iraq and Afghanistan and to support genocide in Africa, and we can’t talk about it under the MSM Democrat Republican Cone of PC Silence. Of course, the original cone of silence was where you could talk truth without being afraid. Problem is that only happens on the Internet. We have to go to the source to win.
If in WWII we had stopped in N. Africa to nation build, we would have lost. We didn’t have a Powell to spout KGB propaganda of 3rd world liberation and reparations. Instead we just invaded Sicily, Italy, France and Germany. We didn’t nation build along the way.
Does anyone even know when the last US troops left North Africa? No. Everyone forgot N. Africa and we went on to win.
In this war, we nation build the first little countries we get to instead of island hop to Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia the countries that are the real source of what’s against us. The time to fight wars is when we lose 200 killed.
The Saudis are the source of the foreign fighters and money in Iraq. Go the source countries against us, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
We will fight forever until we go against those 3. We have to put them all out at the same time, its like John Wayne’s oil fire fighting movie, Hellfighters (1968).
Bakers realism only extends to the next check from Saudi Arabia.
By OldAtlantic | Nov 12, 2006 3:40:56 PM=
Lee Hamilton has already said that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia had no link to 9-11 that he could find. Evidently he couldn’t find the 27 pages of the 2003 Congressional report linking Saudi Arabia to the financing of 9-11.
He also can’t find the web site of the Complete 9-11 Timeline. Nor can he find Christina Lamb’s London Times article, nor it appears anything else that might interdict the money flow from Saudi Arabia to big Washington law firms like Baker and Botts.
Now Baker and Botts has a James A. Baker IV, head of the Washington office. If he is young enough to collect Saudi money for 40 years, then Baker III isn’t going to recommend any action against Saudi Arabia. Why don’t we send the partners of Baker and Botts to fight in Iraq against Saudi foreign fighters funded and supplied from Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Send the Washington Office of Baker and Botts to Afghanistan. How long until they recommend we take on Pakistan after that happens? A draft of their kids might wake up Washington to who is funding the killing of our kids.
search “James A Baker IV“
“Jamie Baker is partner in charge of the Washington office of Baker Botts, where his practice concentrates on international commercial and trade-related matters and transactions. His transactional practice relates principally to the energy and natural resources, telecommunications, and technology sectors of the economy, and involves contract negotiation and documentation of investment vehicles, business combinations, divestitures and operations, and various forms of corporate and project finance.”
“Mr. Baker’s recent representations have included transactions in the Arabian peninsula and North Africa, Central and East Asia, Europe, and Russia, many of which have involved negotiations between private concerns and government agencies or state enterprises.”
“From 1982 to 1985, prior to joining Baker Botts, Mr. Baker served as counsel to the U.S. Senate Majority Leader. He is currently co-chairman of the U.S.-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce, and he serves on the advisory board of Milestone Merchant Partners, a Washington-based investment firm.”
James A. Baker III at Baker and Botts
“Mr. Baker is presently a senior partner at Baker Botts. He is honorary chairman of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University and serves on the board of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. From 1997 to 2004, Mr. Baker served as the personal envoy of United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan in seeking a political solution to the conflict over Western Sahara. In 2003, Mr. Baker was appointed Special Presidential Envoy for President George W. Bush on the issue of Iraqi debt.”
Bush Pioneers and Jack Abramoff
Baker Botts defending lawsuit against Saudis for 9-11. Damaging admissions according to MSNBC.
“But in laying out their arguments, Sultan’s U.S. lawyers also presented highly detailed new evidence of the Saudi government’s role in funneling millions of dollars to a web of Islamic charities that are widely suspected by U.S. officials of covertly financing the operations of Al Qaeda and other international terrorist groups.”
==Saudi Arabia 9-11
“ Saudi Government Provided Aid to 9/11 Hijackers, Sources Say
By Josh Meyer
The Los Angeles Times
Saturday 02 August 2003
WASHINGTON – The 27 classified pages of a congressional report about Sept. 11 depict a Saudi government that not only provided significant money and aid to the suicide hijackers but also allowed potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to flow to Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups through suspect charities and other fronts, according to sources familiar with the document.
One U.S. official who has read the classified section said it describes “very direct, very specific links” between Saudi officials, two of the San Diego-based hijackers and other potential co-conspirators “that cannot be passed off as rogue, isolated or coincidental.”
Said another official: “It’s really damning. What it says is that not only Saudi entities or nationals are implicated in 9/11, but the [Saudi] government” as well.”
This article is hypotheses, speculation and opinion. All other conceivable disclaimers apply.