Is there any x such that Keep America .x white is not racist in the view of the critics? What value will satisfy their demands? Is it always a little less than the current value?
When x was approximately 9, so .x was .9, Kennedy said it had to go down. That was in 1965. For Kennedy, immigration quotas intended not just to preserve .x as .9 for whites but also preserve white ethnic group percentages was unacceptable. Well that issue is now gone.
Although .x is not yet below .5, Bill Clinton has already said he wants it below .5. When it is .45 will Clinton want it below .4? When its .35 will he want it below .35? Will Clinton say when its .45 that we have to stop non-white immigration to keep it from going below .4? Will SPLC say that? Will Charles Johnson say that at LGF? Bush? Hillary Clinton?
Will the RINO 4 say that? The RINO 4 are Fred Thompson, John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Rudi Giuliani. Giuliani has already called Tancredo a know-nothing for opposing any restrictions on legal immigration below what they are now.
Isn’t that the formula? Whatever it is now, restricting it from that is racist, nativist and Nazi? Which means when it was less in the past, it was racist, nativist and Nazi?
Where you draw the line is Racist Hypothesis.
Any thing bad for whites or any harm to whites that you say is the limit will be called racist, Nazi, bigoted and unacceptable to the liberals. This applies to white birth percentages, immigration quotas, white percentage in society, etc. There is no point you can make a stand that they won’t call white nationalist.
White Zeroist Corollary
If we aren’t called white nationalist, the white percentage will decline to zero.
Proof.
It takes an effort to stop the excess immigration, affirmative action, ER and welfare mandates that are substituting non-white births or immigration for white births. (See other articles on this.)
At any level the positive effort is made to halt the decline, those doing it and supporting it will be called white nationalist, Nazi, white supremacist, and bigot. (Especially if its a measure that works instead of a band aid for votes that doesn’t work.)
What works hypothesis, name calling as bad as what doesn’t.
If we pursue policies that actually retain the white ratio above 0, then we will be called racist, Nazi, white nationalist, white supremacist etc. as much as if we pursue policies that in fact simply slow the approach to zero, but don’t alter the convergence to zero.
==Vanishing Survival Example
Assume US population at 300 million was the maximum. If people live 75 years, then 4 million die per year. If 2 million enter then births = 4million deaths – 2 million entrants = 2 million.
The ratio of births to deaths is 2/4 or 1/2. The time from birth to parent is roughly 25 years. So in 50 years, one has 1/4, and in 75 years 1/8 of the starting genes.
Even if population went to 450 million, deaths per year are 6 million. With even one million entrants that gives a survival ratio of 5/6. So the number left after 25*n years is (5/6)^n which goes to zero as n goes to infinity.
It goes to zero rapidly in fact. Note that we can substitute an onshore source group for immigration if its fertility is pushed above replacement by affirmative action in education and employment, welfare, ER mandates, permitted verbal and physical violence against whites, etc.
==
http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/070524_nd.htm
Edwin S. Rubenstein
The number of non-white Americans exceeded 100 million for the first time in 2006, according to a just released Census Bureau report.
According to the latest figures, non-Hispanic whites accounted for 66.4 percent of U.S. population on July 1, 2006. Minorities were 33.6 percent of the total. As recently as 1990, 76 percent of Americans called themselves non-Hispanic white. In 1965, the American population was 88 percent white.
In 2006 white, non-Hispanics accounted for:
56 percent of persons 9 and younger
60 percent of persons 10 to 19
67 percent of persons 20 to 64
81 percent of persons 65 and older Based on 2004 fertility rates (the latest available), non-Hispanic white women will have 1.847 children; non-Hispanic Black women, 2.02 children; and Hispanic women, 2.82 children.[PDF]
In 2006 45.9 percent of live births were to minority mothers. That was up from 45.0 percent in 2005.
By 2021 more than 60 percent of births will be to minorities (Table 2.)
Of course, if immigration were completely cut off now, the date at which minorities would become the U.S. majority would be greatly postponed—probably into the 22nd century.
==The Wright Island Model Theorem
In population genetics, the case of one way migration is often treated in what is called the “Island Model”.
Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.
The Island Model with Stochastic Migration
Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1213928
The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.
The above implies that if you have two genes in some frequency in the immigrant population, that under one way migration that frequency becomes the frequency on the island.
From PDF, conclusion:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
==Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem
Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem
This adds to and is actually easier to understand than the Wright Island Model papers.
This is draft and preliminary. Although whites used, the same applies to all genes in the country at any point in time. Comments welcome. This is offered as science and math related to reform in US legislation on immigration, affirmative action and welfare transfers. This is subject to revision. All other disclaimers apply.
Amnesty and legal immigration expansions are going on all the time at Congress. Stopping it once doesn’t stop it. Please keep up to date.
http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter
==Added
“Keeping America White” at SPLC. Comments on Peter Brimelow and Vdare whom SPLC doesn’t want to Keep America White or Keep America .x white for any x greater than zero?
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=152
==Asymptotic Zero
Immigration bounded above zero does not produce a mixture of genes present or arriving at any time and later genes. The result is not a mixture, its asymptotic extinction of every gene at any point in time, and any gene arriving in any year. There is no mixture of genes now and genes to come. Immigration is a genetic graveyard, all genes that are here or come here go extinct.
The extinction isn’t pleasant for the people here or coming here. Every one is subject to wage and economic pressure and uncertainty to eventually substitute immigrants for births. This is why men’s median wages are what they were in 1973 and headed down for the last several years. This is why women’s wages are lower than men’s in 1960 and headed down for the last several years. See page 16 for the graph of men’s and women’s median wages since about 1960:
http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/p60-233.pdf
Going extinct in America isn’t pleasant for all but the rich. But even the rich are frogs in the water, slowly being cooked without knowing it. Millions without health care, oppressive bosses, repetitive motion injuries at work, lack of workplace dignity and security, lack of bargaining power, out of work relatives, loss of dignity for men, loss of meaning for men, crime and drugs, failing schools, know-how transfer to competing or enemy states, etc. are all the means by which the theorems are achieved.
This happens for more and more people, not just whites. All but a thin wedge at the top suffer this. More and more families find that Thanksgiving and Christmas are meeting places for the unemployed, discouraged, underemployed, and fearful. Men lack dignity and women lack men with dignity. This is what its like to live in a genetic graveyard, for all but the very rich and those with tenure at Harvard or think tanks or wealthy public interest law firms. In the SPLC version, Martin Luther King’s dream is we all go extinct together in a genetic graveyard, miserable and fearful and afraid to speak out.
This is speculation, hypotheses, opinion or tentative debate or analysis points. This is subject to revision. All comments welcome. All statements should be restated as questions. All criticism is rhetorical and to be restated as hypotheses or questions. All other disclaimers apply.
==Added 4:31 PM 1 Nov 2007
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/10/caucasophobia-accepted-racism.html
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2613
Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University, now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”
Some of the inventors of Whiteness Studies have stated their goals quite openly: “Abolitionism is also a strategy: its aim is not racial harmony but class war. By attacking whiteness, the abolitionists seek to undermine the main pillar of capitalist rule in this country.” And: “The task is to gather together a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white.”
