Archive for the 'Madoff' Category

Palestinians the Bernie Madoff of countries

March 28, 2009

Taki at Takimag on Israel as the Bernie Madoff of countries.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/israel_the_bernie_madoff_of_countries/

Lawrence Auster:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/012846.html

As we show below, Taki has it backwards.  Its the PLO, Hammas, etc. that are the Bernie Madoff of countries.   They are the false claimants to be a country as a legal moral ethical entity that spreads and rewards good and stops the spread of bad internally, externally and into itself.

The Palestinian authority is the Bernie Madoff of countries.  This is because a country is supposed to be a legal moral entity that upholds both law, morality and justice.  Palestinian entities do the opposite.  A portfolio manager is supposed to invest your money not steal it. So its Palestinian entities who are BM of countries.

Palestinians teach hatred, genocide, immorality, blood lust, and murder.  They teach that intentionally to children.  They are a pathogen of history.

One can analyze human affairs and history in terms of genes.  But then one must choose.  Its not that every gene is equal.  Its not that whichever gene wins, its the same.  Its not that whatever gene occupies a land should own it.  Genes are not rooted to land.

Genes spread, everywhere and always.  Its a question of which ones.  That is the real issue of morality.  Helping bad genes exist means helping bad ones spread. That means the end of human civilization. Spreading bad genes means the end of goodness, morality, law and ethics.  Thus to support the victory of bad genes over good can’t be justified on moral grounds, since its the destruction of morality itself that it leads to.

Human development means weeding out bad genes.  Human destruction means the spread and even persistence of bad genes.  Bad genes that persist anywhere will spread.  Thus human development means the spread of good genes and their replacement of bad genes everywhere.  That is morality.

Genes that are the carriers of morality must replace those that are the enemy of morality.  That is the only moral course.  There is no morality at all in genes that undermine morality replacing those that do. To let such genes persist anywhere is to let them spread everywhere.  Thus morality requires their being culled out. That is the only possible morality. Anything else is the end of morality itself.

Opposing genes that carry morality and supporting those that oppose morality is to oppose morality.  Liberalism is about opposing and destroying morality.  Liberalism is amoral.   Liberalism is actually evil.  It casts itself in the role of Satan.   It uses lies as its preferred method.  It says it will do good but delivers evil.  The outcome is always evil but the promise good.  This is the essence of Satanism and is what Bernie Madoff has pled guilty to in the instances in his plea.

Morality is about self control.  Palestinians are about the opposite.  Palestinians have shown their lack of self control and that they idolize violent emotion and physical violence over education, work and cooperation.  They have intentionally chosen violence over cooperation.

Whatever money Palestinians are given, they waste.  This is whether it comes from Arabs, Christians or Jews.  The result is the same.  They are incapable of being good stewards of money. Or of land. They destroy and despoil any land they are given.  When Gaza was given to them by Israel, the Palestinians proceeded to destroy the buildings and improvements to the land.

Taki’s fallacy is useful because it leads us to the truth.  This is like much of neoconism.  A neocon is someone who advocates defeat against every foe that threatens the West while pretending to fight at least one of them.  A conservative is someone who advocates publicly the measures needed to defeat at least one foe of the West.  There are few conservatives.

For example, a conservative advocates drafting 2 million men, invading Iran removing its nuclear program, surrounding and blockading Pakistan to do the same, and the invasion of Saudi Arabia to remove Islam at the source.  Or a conservative advocates the end of 3rd world immigration and measures that will remove the 3rd world invasive population over time from the West.  A conservative is against know-how transfer to China and for stopping Chinese immigration and the gradual return of Chinese to China, because they are a fifth column in the West.  There are few conservatives.

Taki is at his core the same as Frum. Takism and Frumism are at the core the same.  They both shy away from advocating victory for the West.  Or rather, Taki shies away, and Frum is an opportunist as Auster has pointed out who is really the deadly enemy of the West.  Taki is a dilettante who can’t remember his lessons.  One hopes he can learn, but it never happens.  Taki is a perpetual C student on Western survival and anything else which requires a combination of theory and fact.  Auster on the other hand is excellent and a fearless realist on that combination when analyzing the threats and remedies the West must pursue.

Madoff deserves segregrated prison as do all

March 12, 2009

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=asmcBPMTWqWI&refer=home

March 12 (Bloomberg) — Bernard Madoff, scheduled to plead guilty today to masterminding the largest Ponzi scheme in history, may have to fight off prison inmates who want to squeeze him for money or blame him for the Wall Street crash.

Its really blacks and Hispanics that will bother him.  It was Justice Ginsberg who did this to him. She said prisons could not separate the races despite the prison authorities of all races thinking it was the only rational way to run a prison based on experience.  Instead of the cruel guards and wardens, it turns out that they are the ones who want it better for the prisoners.

Its Justice Ruth Ginsberg (and Breyer, O’Connor, Souter and Kennedy) who wants to hurt them for the sake of cruelty itself.  She turns out to be the evil person not the guards or wardens.  Its the Supreme Court that is the evil one.  How familiar that is.  It legislates against the facts, morality and the law.

Steve Sailer:

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050227_segregation.htm

Links to data etc:

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/prison-rape/

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=at3&num=100&q=human+rights+watch+rape+prison+&btnG=Search

This has parallels to the Chandra Levy case.  Levy was killed by an immigrant, Ingmar Guandique, from Salvador.  The majority of Jewish activists support immigration.  Levy was Jewish and was killed by him.  He also attacked two blonde women who fought him off.  The Levy family still blame Condit and have not spoken out against 3rd world immigration.

Like Justice Ginsberg and Breyer, the Jewish supporters of immigration end up hitting their own.  Now its Madoff facing prison conditions.  Because his sentence will be long, he may not get a safer prison.

In effect, although this is harsh, the Jewish supporters of immigration wanted the two blonde girls to be the victims of Ingmar Guandique.  Instead it hit a Jewish girl.  But like 9/11, they see Virgil Goode as the real enemy and keep supporting immigration to finish off Goode and his ilk.  But they hit their own as well.  When will they wake up and see that?

Continuing to support immigration after Levy was killed is saying they want to get the two blonde girls still that fought off Guandique.  Its the same as those who said Virgil Goode was a bigot, which I believe included Paul Wolfowitz.

The intent of 9/11 was to kill more Jewish people on one day than any day in history.  The average for the Holocaust was about 6000 killed a day.   If the Jewish ratio killed in 9/11 at WTC was 1/4, then 24,000 killed would have been enough relative to the average Holocaust day, and 50,000 total, would have exceeded the peak day.  This was the Muslim intent in coming here.  Yet many Jewish people, including Paul Wolfowitz, say that Virgil Goode is the real bigot and their real enemy.

They also see the two blonde girls as their real enemy, and want them to suffer the same fate as Chandra Levy, and being attacked is already bad enough.  Now its Madoff who is the collateral damage.  The problem is that immigration makes everyone collateral damage, even the non-whites.  It makes it a genetic graveyard.  All genes here and all those that come every year go extinct.  Only hate can motivate someone to support immigration.  Only hate that will see their own destroyed to get the others.

http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem

June 4th, 2007 Assume that

  1. Population is bounded from above
  2. The flow of immigrants is unbounded from above
  3. The survival probabilities of the genes of each immigrant are equal.

Then

For any given cohort of immigrants at time t, the survival probability of their genes at T > t, p(t,T) must go to zero as T goes to infinity.

How many Chandra Levy’s must die for them to learn?  How many 9/11’s for them to learn?  How many Madoffs subjected to brutal conditions from blacks and Hispanics in prison for Justice Ginsberg to learn?  Hating whites and wanting them raped hits your own.  That’s the lesson to learn.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9900E0D8163DF937A15751C0A9639C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Of course, it wasn’t just Ginsberg.  Breyer, Souter, O’Connor and Kennedy were also part of the self-hating whites who did this to other whites.  They all have done the worst a judge can do.  They have inflicted their own hate on prisoners who can’t do anything about it. This is worse than Gitmo.

Jewish activists for racial integration in prison are the ones who are doing this to Madoff, as well as others.   They really need to ask themselves what their motives are.  Why do they keep making things worse for Jews and non-Jews alike?  Why do they think they are not full of hate?  (Others too can ask themselve that.  But the point has to be made to Jewish activists as to why they are doing what they are doing for them to stop.  Why are they hurting their own with 9/11, Chandra Levy rape and murder, and now Madoff subjected to Hispanic and black gang rape risk in prison?)  As Human Rights Watch points out, its black and Hispanic gangs that rape whites in prison.  It is racist.

http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2001/prison/

Why have the same hate for whites that Eric Holder has?  He hates Jewish people as much as other non-blacks.  Probably more.  Obama too sat in that church and heard South Side Sermons for 20 years.  In Sum, Jewish activists for immigration or against segregration have to ask themselves, why?  Why are they for 9/11?  Why are they for the killing of Chandra Levy?  Why? Why do they keep saying Virgil Goode is the real bigot?  Their real enemy?  Or Sarah Palin?  Or whoever it is this month?  Why do they need an Archie Bunker figure to hate?  Even though the consequences are so harmful to Jewish people?

Bernie Madoff should go to a decent prison, not one with Hispanics and blacks who form gangs and rape whites.  Prisons should be segregated as much as possible.  Given the excessive population, caused by 3rd world immigration which brings the violent as well as cuts off chances for those here already, prisons could be segregated down to small ethnic groups.  A separate Jewish prison is where Madoff should go.

Every white ethnic group should get a separate prison. So should separate Asian groups and Latinos.  So should different black groups, e.g. Somalis and Haitians.  The same should apply to schools and colleges.  Separation and segregration is the way to fairness.  History shows that is what people want and that divesity is itself cruel punishment.  People strive to make it unusual not usual.  Its only cruel rulers who try to make it usual.

The guards and wardens should be of the same group as the prisoners.  Just like there are women guards for women’s prisons.  This is the way to ease things.  Finer distinctions can be made as to education, IQ, etc within groups so that the prisons are small and manageable.  The worst prisoners should go in separate high security facilities.  Madoff is obviously not in that group.

Most non-violent prisoners should be kept out of prison entirely.  The size of Madoff’s fraud makes it harder for him to fit that group and the chance that he has additional assets off shore.  One of the reasons to keep the non-violent out of prison is so they are not subjected to the harsh condition of diversity.

Segregation in prison would also make them better places for people to learn.  More could learn new skills, job and personal, by being in segregrated prisons than the current ones.  Black and Hispanic gangs make prisons intolerable. Those gangs should be separated so that blacks and Hispanics have a chance as well, or more of one.

Like can teach like.  They will find more inspiration from their own than from others.  They understand each other better and interact better. The result is better results.   Prison reform can be a model for society.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.