John Hennessy on Charlie Rose declares that the best and brightest are Chinese and that they will control America technologically and that this is Stanford’s mission. Hennessy said the mission statement of Stanford is to do what the Chinese government wants and to promote the ethno interests of Chinese. Stanford is now an outpost of the Chinese intelligence service. It serves its interests and is part of a pipeline of Chinese ethnocrats, and know-how and people pipelines.
Hennessy said Chinese are the best and brightest. Hennessy implied Chinese only policy in Ph.D. programs in science, math, engineering and business is where Stanford is headed to the extent possible. He said the purpose of business in Silicon Valley was to open branches in China and transfer technology and know-how to China and Chinese.
(Note that the superior and best and brightest Chinese for some reason need know-how transfer from the whites they are replacing at Stanford.)
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
Declined to State 9.5%
Hennessy said that Chinese are the top source of grad students at Stanford followed by India, if I remember his remarks appropriately. The implication was that the grad school was more non-white than whites. Hennessy said Stanford had the best and brightest in its grad school. He said the whole future was in China and that all new tech companies had to have a branch in China.
The Operations Research dept at Stanford
Ph.D. students are mostly non-white.
Its similar at OR at Princeton.
OR is a large part of practical math, constrained optimization. Database mining by government or industry is operations research to a large extent.
Its a field most people don’t know about. Very few Americans now are taught in it. The people controlling how to data mine databases and optimize them are these people. They control the databases. They write he code that helps decide what offers to make to which consumer segment by the programs they write, or who INS will stop on their way into the country, or how well an electronic fence will work v. increasing the border patrol.
China has intentionally spread nuclear know-how to Muslim states to use against whites, Christians and Jews. See
==Also this comment at Commentary Magazine
Stillman case against CIA etc
Danny B. Stillman v. Central Intelligence Agency — Memorandum Opinion
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
Mar 30, 2007 … Declaration of Danny B. Stillman (“Fifth Stillman Decl.”) ¶ 3. In China, Stillman visited nuclear weapons facilities and test …
http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/stillman033007.pdf – Similar pages
Danny B. Stillman v. Department of Defense
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
Plaintiff Danny Stillman is a former employee of the Los …… Aly Decl. at ¶ 14(b). These conclusions about the importance of …
news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/dod/stllmndod61002opn.pdf – Similar pages
These were in 2001 before and after 9/11.
CIA was in with Pakistan ISI in 1980’s and 1990’s. They covered up for Pakistan to get
money while China was giving it nukes. CIA was completely complicit in Pakistan’s activities and was trying to suppress that. See Complete 9/11 Timeline. The pressure on Stillman was in 2001 before and after 9/11.
Search Pakistan sanctions unjust. I have some links here:
Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001
NEW YORK: The Bush administration is preparing to lift punitive sanctions imposed on India for its nuclear program. But clearing this hurdle to bolster political, economic and military ties with India while maintaining even sterner sanctions on Pakistan would be seen throughout the Middle East as discrimination of the first order. Islamabad would be pushed in dangerous directions, particularly toward increased reliance on its nuclear and missile programs.
Further crippling a weak Pakistan, perhaps to the point of state failure, would invite its myriad problems to spill over into other countries. Islamic militancy, arms and drug trafficking and religiously motivated sectarian violence could have devastating consequences for India’s economic prospects and cause trouble in important Islamic oil-producing countries. Risks to U.S. forces and interests in the Middle East would be a virtual certainty.
This was week before 9/11. One hypothesis: Pakistan ISI head came to DC asked to lift sanctions and give money. US said no. So he gave go ahead to 9/11. Following week US agreed. Then he gave go ahead to anthrax letters to divert attention from terrorism from abroad to domestic terrorism.
Stanford spreads out know-how to China that gives it to Pakistan and Iran and other Muslim terror states and groups. China has an easy to make nuke specifically for Muslim states. That is what it gave to Pakistan which passed it on to Iran. That is Stanford doing that.
Assuming Pakistan was behind 9/11 and the anthrax attacks to extort money and end sanctions for its nuclear test in 1998, that makes Stanford a co-consprirator in 9/11 as part of this overall plan to ethnically cleanse whites.
We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
This is Stanford’s plan according to Stanford president John Hennessy. It was amazing the facial expressions he had while Charlie Rose exposed that at Stanford whites were a minority as undergraduates.
Hennessy also grinned while saying every company has to open a branch in China and transfer know-how to China there. Does that include Boeing? Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin? Los Alamos National Laboratory as well? Or just the feeder companies and universities that gather the know-how for China? Hennessy sounded like and in fact is, a propagandist for China and Chinese ethno-interests.
The above is opinion, hypothesis and speculation. Restate all statements as questions. All other disclaimers apply. This is part of a petitition to Congress to end immigration and investigate the influence of foreign governments and entities at US institutions including educational ones, financial firms and technology companies.