Archive for August, 2007

Senator Larry Craig

August 28, 2007

Who does he think he is, Kennedy?

Where did he think he was? The Senate men’s room? The page dormitory?  A K street lobbying firm?  A DC law firm?   Chappaquiddick?

What did he think he was doing?  Earmarks?  Toemarks? Handmarks?  Senate-marks? Senate hand signals?

Craig voted yes on cloture (vote here) on the immigration bill just like Kennedy, even though it was a 69-23 vote. S1348 votes here.

He also voted yes on cloture for S. 1639, the earlier version in 2007 and he voted for S. 2611 the 2006 Kennedy McCain version.

Terry Graham at Vdare comments on Craig’s voting record on immigration.

Invade Iran: Air Attack Won’t Work

August 28, 2007

The one benefit of Israel’s air attack plan in Lebanon in 2006 was to show to the US that an air attack won’t work now anymore than it did in the Battle of Britain or the air war over Germany.

Iran can respond to an air attack by unleashing the Mahdi army in Iraq.  It has Russian supplied anti-ship Sunburn missiles.  Iran is dangerous, more so than Saddam.  Iranians are more nationalistic than Iraqis, and this includes the Iranian diaspora and secular Iranians.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=384CFE53-5830-4377-B773-0F53C0602871 

Christiane vs. Christians and Jews

By Phyllis Chesler
FrontPageMagazine.com | 8/27/2007Christiane Amanpour’s hit piece on Christians and Jews and the West in general shows how a Christian Iranian ex-pat in the West identifies with Iran in a war with the West.  We should not expect anything else.  In a war with Iran, we need a decisive victory and occupation that renders Iran’s assets and resources useless.

Study: US preparing ‘massive’ military attack against Iran
Larisa Alexandrovna and Muriel Kane
Published: Tuesday August 28, 2007

http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Study_US_preparing_massive_military_attack_0828.html 

“Considering a war with Iran:
A discussion paper on WMD in the Middle East”
Embargoed to 01.00 Hours GMT
28 August 2007
Dr Dan Plesch and Martin Butcher
September 2007
1

Page 65 of the pdf covers Iran’s possible responses to an air attack.

http://www.cisd.soas.ac.uk/index.asp

Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy

When a man in a burqa

August 27, 2007

Mayor: “We don’t want any more trouble like you had last year in the Philmore District.”

Harry: “When I see a man chasing a woman with intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard.”

Lawyer: “How did you establish intent to commit rape?”

Harry: “When a man in a burqa is chasing a woman up an alley with a butcher knife and a smile on, chances are he’s not out collecting for the Red Cross.”

Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry

Conservative Libertarian Quotes

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066999/

 

Director:

Don Siegel

 

Writers:

Harry Julian Fink (screenplay) &
Rita M. Fink (screenplay) …
more

 

Release Date:

23 December 1971 (USA) more view trailer

 

Genre: American Crusader

You don’t assign him to jihad cases, You just turn him loose.


Detective Harry Callahan. He doesn’t break al Qaeda cases. He smashes them.Do you feel lucky, jihad punk?

With his .44 Magnum, the most powerful Christian gun in the world, Dirty Harry wipes out jihad to hell.


Clint Eastwood is “Dirty Harry.” And boy, does he get all the jihad jobs.In the year 1971, San Francisco faces the terror of a maniac known as Saudio- who snipes at innocent victims and demands ransom through Koran quotes left at the scene of the crime.The downfall of societal coddling of radical Muslims is the theme of the debut of Inspector Harry Callahan, who has no patience for Islam and less of such for revolving-door justice as well as “religion of peace” spouting politicians who wilt under the pressure of a deranged Islamist in white silk who uses a sniper rifle to kill several innocent people, only to go free because the incriminating rifle was obtained by an “illegal” search based on an NSA wiretap. Harry must break societal rules to stop the madman society allows to roam free.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Harry

http://www.filmsite.org/dirt.html

http://www.moviequotes.com/repository.cgi?pg=3&tt=55499

Saudio the Koran Killer playing in neighborhoods everywhere, for now. Can Harry stop him?

I know what you’re thinking, punk. You’re thinking, did he fire six shots or only five? Well to tell you the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement of internal struggle. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and will blow your jihad clean off, you’ve got to ask yourself a question: do I feel lucky? Well do ya, punk?

==Appendix

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017922.php

Russian Muslim arrested in Afghanistan on terrorism suspicions

Wearing a burqa, evidently.

This is more evidence of the international character of the jihad, belying claims that various jihads around the world are merely local insurgencies.

“Russian man arrested in Afghanistan over terrorism suspicions,” from ITAR-TASS (thanks to Twostellas):

ISLAMABAD, August 28 (Itar-Tass) — A Russian citizen has been arrested in Afghanistan as a suspected associate of terrorists, the Iranian news agency IRNA reported on Monday.It said the man identified as Andrei, who professes Islam, and two citizens of Afghanistan had been arrested in the province of Paktia near the border with Pakistan.

A representatives of the Paktia authorities said they had been arrested after about 500 kilograms of explosives had been found in their automobile.

The Russian man allegedly told police he had entered Afghanistan from Pakistan after trips to Egypt, Turkey, and Iran. He planned to travel to Tajikistan from Afghanistan and then to Russia.

According to police, all three men were wearing women’s clothes.

Posted by Robert Spencer at August 27, 2007 7:56 PM

Pakistan Horror movie, “Burqa Man”

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1632168,00.html?xid=rss-world&iid=sphere-inline-bottom

Mail and Guardian

http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=312241&area=/insight/insight__international/

Gonzales Resigns Questions for Chertoff if AG

August 27, 2007

The following questions are for Michael Chertoff. Note these are questions not assertions. All assertions should be restated as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

  1. Does Russia keep files on plagiarism by profs in the US?
  2. Does that include possible plagiarism by Stanley Fischer in his 1969 MIT Ph.D. thesis and Paul Samuelson in a 1969 MIT NSF grant.
  3. Samuelson is the uncle of Larry Summers.
  4. Did Russia use this to pressure Nobel Prize nominations from Paul Samuelson and Kenneth Arrow, uncles of Larry Summers in the 1970’s for Kantorovich of the USSR?
  5. Did this happen in part at an economics conference in Warsaw in 1972? There are living persons from that conference such as Martin Beckmann.
  6. Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer had control over IMF loans to Russia in the 1990’s. Did Russia use this information to pressure them?
  7. Did Harvard or the Clinton admin conceal this information from the USAO Mass investigation of Harvard from 1997 to 2005? This was led by Assistant US Attorney Sara Bloom.
  8. Did Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, or John Yoo know this and use it to get the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 or to influence Scalia in Bush v. Gore, or to influence Gore to give up and go away quietly?
  9. Was an agreement reached by George W. Bush and his staff as non-federal employees prior to Jan 20, 2001 to conceal this information from the FBI and Senate in nominations and from the USAO Mass investigation?
  10. Did George W. Bush and others form an agreement as non-federal employees prior to Jan 20, 2001 to allow Russia to continue its network of academics or others in the US?
  11. At this point, did George W. Bush and others become effectively linked to actions of the Russian government against the United States and become part of a conspiracy against the United States prior to Jan 20, 2001 as non-federal employees?
  12. Did Michael Chertoff become aware of this agreement at some time?
  13. Did Michael Chertoff fail to notify Congress of this in any prior nomination of Michael Chertoff?
  14. Did Michael Chertoff fail to notify Congress or act on this as an employee of the DOJ or DHS?
  15. Did Alberto Gonzales join this possible conspiracy at some point?
  16. Was the firing of US attorneys intended to further this conspiracy, and to further Russia’s ability to keep its network in the US intact?
  17. Did other nations, such as China, India, Pakistan or Mexico learn of this method of Russia in the 1940’s or 1950’s and then realize that Russia had reactivated this method in the 1990’s to get IMF loans?
  18. The USAO Mass investigation became public in 1997. In 1998, India and Pakistan did nuclear tests. Did they realize the Clinton team by 1998 had already concealed information from the USAO Mass investigation? Were they using that to do their nuclear tests?
  19. In August of 1998, al Qaeda hit US embassies. Was Pakistan relying on its information on the Clinton administration to get away with its support of al Qaeda?
  20. Did Harvard, the Clinton administration and others become accessories after the fact to Pakistan’s support of al Qaeda?
  21. Did they become accessories before the fact as Pakistan continued its support of the Taliban and al Qaeda from August 1998 to present?
  22. Did Bush and his team form an agreement prior to Jan 20, 2001 that they would not hinder Pakistan in its support of al Qaeda as part of furthering a conspiracy to use this information to gain the presidency or influence the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore or influence Gore not to protest in the Senate, an official act, or during the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act effort?
  23. After the 9-11-2001 attacks, did Bush’s team in a meeting with Pakistan’s General Ahmed of the Pakistan ISI allow Ahmed to use this record to get money from the U.S. and lifting of sanctions for its nuclear program, as well as get away with its support of al Qaeda and the Taliban and Afghanistan?
  24. Was this in furtherance of a possible conspiracy formed prior to Jan 20, 2001 as non-federal employees?
  25. Has Bush given India its nuclear deal to keep India from exposing this? Is not Manmohan Singh a former Indian intelligence officer who reverse engineered this for India prior to becoming PM?
  26. Did not Mexico through ITAM and Marcos Moshinsky learn of the 1947 Physical Review Fock Letter, Vainshtein publication in 1969/1970 Matekon and other acts of Russia?
  27. Did Bush give Mexico benefits including illegal immigration and a proposed amnesty and legal family reunification as part of keeping them quiet?
  28. Was Michael Chertoff prior to recent enforcement actions, giving Mexico a hands off policy on illegal immigration as part of this possible conspiracy to keep them from exposing it?
  29. Did Paul Wolfowitz learn of this from his father Jacob Wolfowitz as to events prior to Jacob’s death in 1981?
  30. Did John Yoo learn this from Berkeley econ/J.D. profs, including one who clerked for Scalia in the 1990’s?
  31. Did Scalia and other justices learn of this from econ Ph.D./J.D. clerks from the same universities that are involved?
  32. Has Russia used this to sell arms to Iran including Sunburn anti-ship missiles intended to sink US carriers which carry over 5000 men and women each?
  33. Was this not allowed by Bush and his team as an act in furtherance of their possible conspiracy?
  34. Does Iran know this? Has Iran used this to get away with its support of the insurgency and killing of US men and women in Iraq?

This is opinion, hypotheses or speculation. All assertions should be restated as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

West’s Rational and Irrational Choices on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan

August 23, 2007

We present a set of rational and irrational choices the West has for its policy in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, and the Persian Gulf.

Scenario 1: Bleed in Afghanistan.

US forces in Afghanistan, out of Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan to keep US monthly casualty rate high. Iran,Iraq, and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is supported by some Democratic candidates for president and some other leading Democrats. There is also some Republican support for this. This is also favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 2: Bleed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

US forces in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan and Iraq to keep US casualty rate high. Iran and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is close to a second choice supported by some Democratic and Republican candidates for president and some other leading Democrats and Republicans. This is also somewhat favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 3: Admit defeat and bring the war home.

US out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Persian Gulf. Iran and Pakistan nuclear. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq bases of international terrorism. US allows immigration and travel from Islamic lands to West.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Appeasing policymakers.
Advocates: Some in MSM, Some Democrats.

Variant of 1, 2 and 3: An ineffective missile and air attack on Iran leading to the Persian Gulf being closed to shipping and the isolation of US forces in Iraq, if any, and Kuwait from supply and naval support. This variant is somewhat unstable and leads either to war with Iran, or withdrawal from Iraq, Kuwait and the Gulf because of lack of supply.

Scenario 4a: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, Stay in Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US stays in Iraq and Afghanistan. Travel from Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq to West is not allowed. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4b: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, leave Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US leaves Iraq but stays in Afghanistan. Pakistan and Iran are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Iraq is a weak base of terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4a and 4b are logical and in our interest. Therefore they are scored as bigoted and racist and not possible by the MSM and Left.

Diagnosis: West is at war with Islam and won’t admit it. West is at war, demographically, with third world and won’t admit it. The mistakes in the Middle East are just more of the same as the last 50 years of 3rd world immigration. This demographic conflict is, in part, the West’s own making by its own expansion of the third world population bubble.

Senator John Warner has advocated changing Maliki and starting some withdrawal of US forces from Iraq. This is because Bush focuses on Iraq and won’t think about the rest. We have no rational policy. That leaves us in the Iraq irrationality that comes from Bush’s brain.

The following comment was posted at Raw Story and they pulled the entire thread.

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer
Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

If we do a missile strike on Iran, we have to pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf because of their antiship missiles. But then they can never go back in. We then can’t supply Iraq or even Kuwait. So we have to withdrawal completely from the Persian Gulf and abandon Kuwait and the Iraqi, Kuwaiti, and Saudi oil fields to Iran. This is actually worse than Saddam’s plan to take them.

The US is in paralysis because its in reality denial. We are in a war with Islam and the Middle East. They are at war with us. We are losing that war, primarily by immigration. We are going extinct from third world immigration as a mathematical theorem. We are unable to admit reality and so we can’t act on it.

We have allowed Pakistan to effectively extort money from us by the terrorism they have permitted since 1998 after they did their nuclear test. Pakistan had 38 billion in foreign debt on 9-11, with its interest greater than gross exports as its central banker wrote in a book. We let them extort money from us and they still are. We have to prevent Iran from getting nukes and denuke Pakistan.

Pakistan treats us with contempt because we have troops in Afghanistan but no ground supply route. The only way to get one is to invade Iran and position our forces on the border of Pakistan. Then we can, with India, surround and blockade Pakistan.

Instead, we are allowing pipeline deals through Pakistan to India that will further undermine our bargaining power. We allow arranged marriages from Pakistan and Afghanistan to people in the US as family reunification. We allow free movement to some terrorists from the Middle East to the West. We allow them on planes. We did so half-knowingly, in part, before 9-11.

We are fools. We deny reality. We deny our own biology. We think we can conquer death and the physical world by machines and know-how. Our entire lives have become a denial of reality. That is why our policies make no sense.

=

Senator Barack Obama advocates, in effect, our having a monthly casualty rate in Afghanistan pumped up by a nuclear Iran and nuclear Pakistan. This is now the consensus choice of the MSM and US establishment. They support continued appeasement and tribute to Pakistan. They support continued free access to the West by the Muslim world. They support our demographic suicide by immigration, and that’s a mathematical theorem, published in genetics journals.

See the Population Genetics, Wright Island Model, One Way Migration, and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

== Senator Hillary Clinton

Senator Clinton advocates something close to what Barack Obama advocates. She, like Obama, voted for the Bush Kennedy, McCain amnesty.

Senator John McCain is almost out of the race, because he advocated the same irrational mix Bush did, immigration and war. Obama and Clinton advocate that irrational mix as well. Almost every candidate does, except Tom Tancredo and a few others. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are antiwar, so they don’t advocate the full mix. Duncan Hunter is close to Tom Tancredo.

All major candidates, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Rudi Giuliani, Fred Thompson advocate war with at least one Muslim land, appeasement of the others, and allowing the Muslim lands to colonize us by immigration and for their young men here to kill us here.

Reality catches up with presidents, as Bush’s presidency shows. Advocating the irrational makes no sense. Now its in the open that both parties and all major candidates and the MSM are advocating inconsistent irrational policies guaranteed to fail.

The job is for the people to point this out in detail, in writing, on talk radio, in letters, faxes, phone calls, town meetings and other contacts with Congress, the executive, the MSM, etc.

We as voters have to know the facts, numbers, history, theory, etc. better than those we vote for, and then explain to them that their wrong statements are wrong and they aren’t good enough. We have to explain that to the MSM. It takes a village to teach our politicians, MSM, profs, etc. common sense, and rational decision making under uncertainty and under biology. These are things the MSM and elites would rather have us die from than be forced to admit they don’t know how to do it or are too lazy to.

We have to learn the numbers, history, facts, theory, etc. We have to put it together on the internet and elsewhere. We then have to force it down the throat of the MSM, Congress, President, and other elites including Wall Street.

==Iran and Pakistan are our Front line enemies.

We are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan in insurgencies funded and supported by Iran and Pakistan. Al Qaeda doesn’t come from the sky. They are supplied out of Pakistan and other insurgents are supported out of Iran or Saudi Arabia.

We can’t win insurgencies in the back countries of Iraq and Afghanistan while the frontline countries of Iran and Pakistan supply the insurgents and block us from effective action. We need to do a ground invasion now of Iran while its non-nuclear. Then we isolate Pakistan by surrounding it and blockading it.

Pakistan is not strong economically or financially. Pakistan without foreign aid or assistance or trade is not viable as the political entity it is. It will have to negotiate or face break up. We have to insist on our own removal and our own inspections of nuclear weapons.

As a surrounded and isolated country, Pakistan will not be able to maintain or develop its nuclear arsenal. Nuclear weapons decay, so will Pakistan’s. They will wilt, if we have the will to surround them and isolate them physically. That would also mean no arranged marriages from Pakistan to the West as part of family reunification.
==Appendix

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer

Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

Thread now gone:

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/36593.html

This was about John Bolton’s call for attacking Iran.

Virginia Dare’s Birthday at Vdare

August 18, 2007

James Fulford at Vdare discusses Virginia Dare’s birthday and links to articles at Vdare on that topic and the founding of Vdare.com by Peter Brimelow. Virginia Dare was born August 18, 1587.
http://vdare.com/fulford/070817_fulford_file.htm

Peter Brimelow’s book, Alien Nation (available for download) was published in 1995.

Peter Brimelow, Lawrence Auster, Roy Beck, Dan Stein, and many others were fighting this fight in the 1990’s and even in the 1980’s in some cases.
Fairus was founded in 1979. Fairus publications are here. Center for Immigration Studies was founded in 1985.

Dan Stein Report, where can post comments.

Lawrence Auster published “The Path to National Suicide” in 1990 (download here). Auster works. VFR.

Wiki on Auster.

Numbers USA “Our lost future” graphic. Jordan Commission 1994 report. Other Jordan Commission info. Roy Beck Case Against Immigration 1996.

Vanishing American reviews the Virginia Dare story with links to articles on Virginia Dare including the Saturday Evening Post article in 1941 on the Virginia Dare Stones:

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/08/virginia-dare-lost-colony-and-us.html

Vanishing American does a great job in bringing forward the contribution of many blogs on stopping immigration completely, not simply vague reform.

DHS Immigration Statistics.

http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/

33 million illegals and counting:

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/08/prospects-for-west-part-ii.html

Fred Elbel at American Resistance

http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/illegal_alien_numbers.html

Steve Sailer in 2005 reported that the Mexican government at that time estimated 20.64 million Mexicans living in the US.

http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/050821_chavez.htm

A Vdare reader estimates 40 million illegals in the US.

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_081407.htm

Above Replacement level Immigrants and their descendants since 1970 number about 50 million according to Roy Beck at Numbers USA.

The cost of post 1965 immigrants and their descendants may be 3/4 to 1.5 trillion per year. This top down estimate is discussed here. That estimate is based on 41 million foreign born. That includes legal and illegal.

http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign.html

http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/acscensus.cfm

http://www.cis.org/topics/currentnumbers.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Dare

http://the-lost-colony.blogspot.com/

http://www.lost-colony.com/

==Vdare’s Fan Club

Southern Poverty Law Center aka Southern Poverty Love Center

vdare site:splcenter.org

“Keeping America White”

“At a meeting of ‘paleoconservatives,’ former Forbes editor Peter Brimelow and others sound the alarm on non-white immigration”
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=285

Note that its a mathematical theorem that sustained one way migration will cause extinction of all genes in America or Europe or Australia or Canada. Thus one way migration is genetic extinction of all whites, as well as anyone else in those regions, and with a lag, everyone who comes there. This is in SPLC’s way of thinking, “normal”, and objecting to it by those in these lands is “racist”. See the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=286

Other SPLC Love targets

Taylor and the Pioneer Fund are attacked in the article on Peter Brimelow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Taylor

Taylor founded American Renaissance in 1990. Archive from 1990.

Pioneer Fund

http://www.pioneerfund.org/

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=105

“Into the Mainstream An array of right-wing foundations and think tanks support efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable”
By Chip Berlet

The Nativists
Around the country, an anti-immigration movement is spreading like wildfire. An array of activists is fanning the flames.
by Susy Buchanan and Tom Kim

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/population-genetics-island-model-one-way-migration/

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1213928

The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.

Prof Nagylaki didn’t make the 2005 list of Nativists compiled by SPLC, but maybe he can make the 2007 list? SPLC can search Wright Island Model.

“Results 1100 of about 1,990,000 for wright island model.”

Look at that, almost 2 million nativists, or a smaller number who are beavering away. Nativists seem to congregate in biology departments.

SPLC should compile a list of bigoted theorems.

Stalin’s henchmen also opposed genetics and biology in the 1940’s. See “Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939-1956: Books: David Holloway by David Holloway.” for a discussion of some of the strange goings on in Soviet science.

See this discussion of Lysenko, a true hero of PC thinking under Comrade Stalin.

The Soviet leadership sought an indigenous theory to counter the “capitalistic” works of Mendel and Charles Darwin and to separate evolution from genetics.

After this interruption for great moments in Stalinism, we now return to SPLC.

genetic site:splcenter.org

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=361

Race and ‘Reason’
Academic ideas a pillar of racist thought
By Barry Mehler

Does SPLC think there is any genetic basis for intelligence in biological organisms at all? Does SPLC think humans have a genetic difference in intelligence with other species? Does SPLC think that if humans differ from other species, that within humans there is perfect uniformity in a genetic basis of intelligence? If humans are not uniform, does the variation correlate to race? Does SPLC say that such statistics are bigoted and therefore false? Does Lysenko live in Montgomery Alabama in that SPLC building which is maintained, in part, by donations based on plagiarism of Colorado Media Matters research?

search Darwin bigot

Darwin site:splcenter.org

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp?S=MI&m=5

No one dared challenge Lysenko until 1964 – 9 years after Stalin died – even when he claimed, between 1948 and 1953, that wheat plants can produce seeds of rye. But, as the Encyclopedia Britannica observes, “he and his followers, however, long retained their degrees, their titles, and their academic positions and remained free to support their aberrant trend in biology.”

http://globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=1228&print=true

Maybe SPLC should be called part of the “Lysenko Nation” and should be called Lysenko Nationalists. Example, the Lysenko Nationalists at SPLC have mounted another fund raising smear against Peter Brimelow.

creationism site:splcenter.org

SPLC attacks whites who are against evolution as creationist Christian cretins. SPLC attacks whites who are for evolution as white nationalist bigots. Which is it? They don’t care, as long as they pay for that nice building? They have one box for donations against whites for evolution and another box for donations against whites against evolution. Pecunia non olet, money has no smell.

The more things change, the more the Stalinist left stays the same.

Blood on the Border

With racist rhetoric heating up and the American economy on unsteady legs, more anti-immigrant violence looms

Anti-Immigration Groups

SPLC plagiarism? SPLC appears to have used Colorado Media Matters research on its own webpage without citation in its dispute with Lou Dobbs on immigration bringing disease to the US, in particular leprosy. CMM and SPLC both compete for the same donations from the left. SPLC has a big building and brings in more more money to itself than CMM.

== Plagiarism of CMM?

search leprosy colorado media matters

leprosy site: colorado.mediamatters.org

leprosy site:splcenter.org

leprosy colorado media matters site:splcenter.org

“Your search – leprosy colorado media matters site:splcenter.org – did not match any documents.”

SPLC never cited CMM, despite apparently using its work. A comparison of the CMM and SPLC articles on leprosy, Lou Dobbs, the Peter Boyles Show, etc. shows that CMM was beating this horse long before SPLC and that SPLC appears to have used some of the same info. CMM is also more honest in linking to data that teaches away from its point of view, in particular a graph that labeled the big bulge of leprosy cases from South Asian immigrants related to post Vietnam asylum. SPLC didn’t cite that link because it teaches that legal immigration is the alternative cause to the spike in leprosy in the US instead of illegal immigration.

SPLC holds itself out as a public interest donation supported law firm. That is an ethical claim to a standard of ethics above a broadcaster like CNN that is for-profit. CNN reporters don’t hold themselves out as experts on leprosy. They also have little time for each story, and have to make nightly deadlines. SPLC has no nightly deadlines. They can take as long as they like to work on one of their pieces. They represent themselves as spending all the time required for a story, not doing the best they can subject to tight news deadlines.

Following have additional points on 60 Minutes and SPLC mining CMM research on the web w/o citation on this story.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/leslie-stahl-60-minutes-lou-dobbs-7000-leprosy-cases-dispute/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/part-2-leslie-stahl-60-minutes-lou-dobbs-7000-leprosy-dispute/

Also a note on SPLC here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/tag/allison-kunhardt/

Editor’s note: Based on evidence compiled by the Intelligence Report, the Southern Poverty Law Center is adding VDARE to its list of hate sites on the Web.”

Based on blatant plagiarism, the post-Lysenko Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian intelligence and Moscow State University are adding SPLC to their list of establishment plagiarism sites on the web, including Harvard University? Please send inquiries, and greetings on his 70th birthday, to Academician Valery Makarov at the New Economic School, Moscow.

More on SPLC

Other early voices to stop immigration.

Buchanan Speech in 1992 at Republican National Convention

http://www.buchanan.org/pa-92-0817-rnc.html

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Patrick_Buchanan’s_Speech_to_1992_GOP_Convention

http://www.buchanan.org/blog/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tancredo

Tancredo opposed bilingual education in the 1970’s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Buchanan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Sailer

Internet rankings: (To be used, not believed.)

http://www.quantcast.com/fairus.org

http://www.quantcast.com/vdare.com

http://www.quantcast.com/blog.vdare.com

Lou Dobbs joined the fight in 2003?

http://www.quantcast.com/keyword:lou+dobbs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Dobbs

He also regained the helm of the newly renamed Lou Dobbs Moneyline (which became Lou Dobbs Tonight in June 2003).

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2867

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1162

In Jan 2004, Dobbs started to be the target of hate profiles.

Extra! January/February 2004

Dobbs’ Choice
CNN host picks immigration as his ax to grind

By Peter Hart

With all the attention paid to the near-overt partisanship of the Fox News Channel, it’s important to remember that skewed reporting wasn’t invented by Rupert Murdoch’s cable operation.

In the last few months of 2003, CNN‘s Lou Dobbs Tonight

The selection of topics, the slanted sourcing and the occasionally inaccurate or incomplete information conveyed on the program all seemed calculated to convince the viewer that the U.S. is in the midst of a crisis that is, according to Dobbs, “changing the very nature of this country” (9/30/03). The title of a series on immigration, “Broken Borders,” conveyed Dobbs’ political position; immigrants were also routinely featured on his show’s regular “Great American Giveaway” segment.

devoted abundant broadcast time to what anchor Dobbs described as an influx of “illegal aliens who not only threaten our economy and security, but also our health and well-being. Millions of aliens crossing our borders.”

http://www.american.com/archive/2006/november/lou-dobbs

In December 2003, the show was reaching an average of 463,000 households a night; by August 2006, it was reaching 646,000 families, according to Nielsen Media Research. Dobbs’s audience share is only one-tenth as large as the average nightly news show on ABC, NBC, and CBS, and less than two-thirds’ the size of the competing Fox News program at 6 p.m. eastern time, “Special Report with Brit Hume.” Still, Dobbs reaches nearly twice as many homes as Chris Matthews, and Dobbs—unlike Hume and Matthews—has an audience that’s powerfully growing.

Casual channel surfers aren’t the only ones tuning in. Members of Congress say that Dobbs’s acerbic positions on his latest fascination, illegal immigration, have become increasingly influential on Capitol Hill. “I’d have to give him pretty strong points for being one of the singular figures to drive this agenda item in Congress,” said a prominent free-trade Republican congressman. Meanwhile, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado), whose views on immigration are similar to those of Dobbs, says he regularly overhears his colleagues telling each other, “If you do this Dobbs will go after us, or if you do this it will play well on Dobbs.”

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060828/eviatar

http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2005/02/lou_dobbs.html

Since 2003, his CNN news show Lou Dobbs Tonight has featured a recurring segment in which Dobbs and his team report on corporations sending jobs overseas. He has compiled an online list of outsourcers

PBS Armenian Genocide At Last

August 5, 2007

One of the ring leaders in the Muslim Turk genocide of the Christians was a Muslim Turkish doctor.

http://ermeni.org/english/vdadrian_harvard.htm

The two major perpetrators – the architects of the Armenian Genocide, Doctor Nazim and Doctor Sakir – in their consultations with their colleagues in the Central Committee, repeatedly declared in so many words that “Sultan Abdul Hamid did an unfinished job; we cannot be satisfied with partial results, therefore in order to be complete, drastic, and definitive about the destruction of the Armenians, we need criminals. We have to be merciless with women and children.”

search Nazim Sakir genocide

http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2006/03/coming_soon_to_viewers_like_you_the_armenian.html

http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2006/04/documenting_and_debating_a_genocide.html

Christian women were put into a harem, and those who were not “sufficiently submissive” were hung for the other women to see.

http://www.armenian-genocide.org/

We can only hope that this program will bring to the broader public’s attention the Turk Muslim genocide of Christians in the Ottoman Empire. This is part of a longer and continuous record of both Muslim and Turkish atrocities against Christians and Jews that started with Muhammad’s pogrom of Jews c. 623 A.D.

Previous posts at OA. These have links to references including New York Times accounts of the genocide while it happened during WWI.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2006/12/03/turkey-christian-armenian-genocide-sources/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/christians-and-jews-in-turkey-in-20th-century/

Andrew Bostom has written recently on the treatment of Jews by the Ottoman Empire from its founding to the 20th century.

http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/blogcategory/30/55/

Under Turkish Rule, Part II

By Andrew G. Bostom
FrontPageMagazine.com | 8/3/2007

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=3CA6CAE4-04C9-4AC6-BA1C-08B047719A1A

Under Turkish Rule, Part I Continued
Published: Friday, July 27, 2007

Search Condoleezza Rice Turkey

Rice supports Turkey in the EU. Even Nicholas Sarkozy realizes this is a mistake.

Search Nicholas Sarkozy Turkey

In testimony to Congress, one Turk said that to be a victim of genocide, the victim must be “totally innocent.” This is a Muslim concept. Any Christian who doesn’t submit to Islam is not innocent.

The Turk testifying said that it was only in Armenian areas that it happened. However, Constantinople was majority Christian at the start of WWI and genocides were reported in the New York Times during WWI as happening in Constantinople.

Why do the Turks deny the genocide? Because in Islam, Christians and Jews are not “totally innocent.” In Islam, Christians and Jews are at war with Islam and thus are never “totally innocent.”

Hrant Dink was killed in Istanbul in 2007 for telling the truth about the genocide. The person killing him said, “I shot the infidel.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/19/wturkey119.xml

search Hrant Dink “shot the infidel”

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/08/no_brakes_on_ge.php

One poster says Turkish children in school in Germany say

Turkish children taunt German children in schools, telling them that Germany will soon belong to Turks and Arabs because “You German pigs don’t have enough babies”. I have heard and read about this scenario time and time again.

Posted by kellye at 4:40 AM on August 19

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={F3F5C99B-338A-4BC1-A4B2-585EFE643619}

John Quincy Adams Knew Jihad

By Andrew G. Bostom
FrontPageMagazine.com | 9/29/2004

Adams on Jihad War, Dhimmitude, and the Muslim View of Non-Muslims; Examples of the Perfidy of Muslim States, Including the Ottoman Turkish State

“The last appeal of the Sultan to the fanaticism of his people, and to the protection of his prophet, has been vain. He told them, that since the happy time of their great prophet, the faithful Mussulmen had never taken into consideration the numbers of the infidels. He reminded them, too truly reminded them, how often they had put millions of Christians to the sword; how many states and provinces they had thus conquered, sword in hand.” 9 [p. 302]

“[More from the Ottoman Sultan’s pronouncement to his subjects]…‘all infidels are but one nation…This war must be considered purely a religious and national war. Let all the faithful, rich or poor, great or little, know, that to fight is a duty with us; let them then refrain from thinking of arrears, or of pay of any kind; far from such considerations, let us sacrifice our property and our persons; let us execute zealously the duties which the honor of Islamism imposes on us – let us unite our efforts, and labor, body and soul, for the support of religion, until the day of judgement. Mussulmen have no other means of working out salvation in this world and the next.’”

This was the Sultan in the early 19th century. At the end of the 19th century, another Sultan in the 1890’s ordered more genocide of the Christians. Then the Young Turks did it during WWI. The entire history of Islam and the Ottoman Empire is a history of atrocities against Christians, their oppression and ethnocide of the them by oppression. The only thing different during WWI was their impatience to get the job done.

They were at the Gates of Vienna in the 18th century. They have engaged in a systematic war of genocide and ethnocide against Europeans for over 700 years. They now covet the takeover of Europe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire

How they treat the Kurds today is how they intend to treat the Europeans when they get the upper hand? When have they ever acted differently? When have they admitted all they did from 1299 to present?

In their minds, Europeans are not “totally innocent.” This is the Muslim concept that Christians are at war with Islam by not submitting to Islam. The Turks know they stole their entire country by genocide and ethnocide.

Turkey is a crime against history and humanity. The population was majority Christian for centuries after the conquest. It took centuries of ethnocide and genocide to achieve the elimination of the Europeans. This was not a one-time crime. This was centuries of the same crime. Turkey is a genocide crime scene. That is what the country is. This is why they lied to Congress that it was only in the countryside and not in Constantinople that it happened.

Constantinople was majority Christian at the start of WWI. The atrocities there are reported in the New York Times, see the links below for links to scanned in NY Times articles and on population records showing the Christian majority in Constantinople.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2006/12/03/turkey-christian-armenian-genocide-sources/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/christians-and-jews-in-turkey-in-20th-century/

The Ottoman Empire had been Christian majority for centuries. It took centuries of ethnocide to change that. The same is true in all the lands that Muslims conquered from the first pogrom of Jews by Muhammad c. 623 A. D. in Medina. Every Muslim land is part of one giant genocide crime scene from c. 623 A.D. to now.

search PBS Armenian genocide site:jihadwatch.org

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/010391.php

Eurabia Update: “Anti-Semitic film cheered with cries of ‘Allah is great’: German authorities worried by audience reaction of Turkish movie goers to ‘Valley of the Wolves,'” from WND, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:

The raucous reception by some members of Germany’s 2.5 million-strong Turkish community to “Valley of the Wolves,” a movie depicting crazed U.S. troops in Iraq massacring a wedding party and a Jewish doctor removing organs from prisoners, has German politicians worried – so worried, Bavaria’s interior minister sent intelligence service agents to theaters showing the film to “gauge” audience reaction and identify potential radicals.The $10 million dollar film, by Turkish director Serdan Akar, has already been wildly successful in Turkey, where its debut was attended by the wife of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. “It is an extraordinary film that will go down in history,” Turkish Parliament speaker Bulent Arinc, president of the Turkish National Assembly told the Anatolia press agency.

Turks Germany site:jihadwatch.org

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017224.php

“Germany: Our turn will come”
Europe is under siege. “Terrorism: Germany Expects Attacks Like Britain’s Says Top Police Official,” from AKI:

Berlin, 2 July (AKI) – Terrorist attacks similar to the failed attacks last week in British capital, London, and at Glasgow airport in Scotland, could occur in Germany, federal police chief Konrad Freiberger said on Monday. There are some 100 individuals living in Germany who may have “the intention and the capability” to carry out such attacks, Freiberger told the Passauer Neue Presse newspaper. He underscored the importance of strengthening security measures to thwart terror plots, the chances of which he said have increased since the German army’s participation in peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan.

Let’s see how tough Ms. Merkel really is.

Crossposted from The American Israeli Patriot.

Posted by Jay at July 3, 2007 8:55 AM

Tom Tancredo against H-1B

August 5, 2007

Randall Burns by email has graciously supplied me with some information that makes the issue of Tom Tancredo and H-1B a little more complicated to understand.

http://www.zazona.com/NewsArchive/2005-09-21%20Tancredo's%20un-REAL%20GUEST%20Ac
t%20of%202005.htm
http://www.outlander.com/policy/imref.htm

and the following that I found in a search

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1054928/posts

Rather than characterize this material myself at this time, I will let the reader follow the leader, in this case Randall Burns, to these other sites.

== The post I had before the input from Randall Burns:

Tom Tancredo has on numerous occasions taken a strong stand against H-1B visas. The following shows that Tancredo has a strong record against H-1B.

Better Immigration has what appears to be an error in its grade for Tom Tancredo as a member of the Colorado Delegation.

For Tom Tancredo as a presidential candidate, they give him an A+ and a check on all items. This is a detailed list.

http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/TancredoPres08.html

http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html

For his individual record in the Colorado Delegation they show him with a B+/C+ on visa workers.

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=CO06&VIPID=146

Tancredo’s Numbers USA profile is all green as well:

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=CO&VIPID=146

This error has propagated to Wikipedia:

Tancredo was an early critic of H-1b expansion. However, his recent votes in that area have been only slightly more restrictive than the average member of Congress and earned a C+ from Americans for Better Immigration, a project of NumbersUSA, in that area of immigration policy.

In 2005, Tancredo sponsored legislation to eliminate H-1B visas for temporary workers[28].

Americans for Better Immigration has awarded Tancredo a career score of 100% and a career grade of A+ for his opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens [29], his efforts to eliminate the automatic granting of citizenship to the babies of illegal aliens[30] and for his support of the interior enforcement of United States immigration laws[31]. In 2007, they awarded Tancredo a “Congressional Immigration Reduction Grade” of A+.[32]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tancredo

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=CO06&VIPID=146

Randall Burns has written a recent column relying on the seemingly incorrect Colorado delegation record for Tancredo at Better Immigration, showing a poor voting record for Tancredo on H-1B. We find, as indicated above, with further research that that webpage appears to be inaccurate.

(In the google blog search engine, for Tancredo H-1B and some other searches, it picks up the Randall Burns quote, and thus gives an incorrect view of this column which finds no support for the poor record on H-1B indicated by the website Burns linked to.)

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=CO&VIPID=146

http://programmersguild.org/docs/Tancredo_18Jun2003.html

Tancredo Statement to House June 18, 2003

Reference: Congressional Record Online (highlighting added)

So I am saying that it is now approaching a million people, if not more, that are here under an H-1b program that are taking jobs in “that high-tech industry that no other American would take.” Does anybody really buy that?

What we know is that they are being given these visas because they will work for less. It is a cheap labor program.

http://teamtancredo.typepad.com/team_tancredo/2007/07/tancredo-on-c-3.html

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/08/05/ames-straw-poll-and-immigration/

Randall Burns]

Furthermore,despite his early attention to H-1b expansion, Tancredo’s recent voting record on H-1b expansion has been fairly weak. Paul has placed less emphasis on immigration, but has a stronger recent record on H-1b expansion.

Is this vote record on Tancredo accurate? It seems in conflict with the Numbers USA link above on Tancredo’s voting record and Tancredo’s statements on H-1B. The website Randall Burns references, Better Immigration, lacks a link to the House on actual votes of Tancredo.

Numbers USA does have links to the Library of Congress webpage.

====Excerpts Numbers USA follows==========

Cosponsored bill to reduce foreign worker importation by eliminating the H-1B program in 2005-2006
Rep. Tancredo was a cosponsor of H.R 1325, to repeal the H-1B visa category for temporary workers in specialty occupations. The H-1B program increases the number of high-tech workers allowed into the U.S; however, there aren’t that many high-tech jobs available in the U.S.Without evidence of a shortage of high-tech workers, and considering it is laden with fraud and abuse, there is no need for the H-1B program. H.R. 1325 recognizes the fact that the program is obsolete – if it was ever truly needed – and puts an end to the unfair job competition for America’s high-tech workers. Read a summary of the bill here.
Cosponsored legislation to protect American jobs by reforming the L-1 and H-1B visa programs in 2003-2004
Rep. Tancredo cosponsored H.R. 2849, the USA Jobs Protection Act of 2003. H.R. 2849 would have implemented reforms of the H-1B and L-1 visa programs aimed at preventing American high-tech workers from being displaced by foreign workers. The legislation included important protections for American workers, including prevailing wage and no-layoff provisions. It also extended current no-layoff provisions for H-1B dependent employers to all H-1B employers. A companion bill, S. 1452, was introduced in the Senate by Senator Dodd.
Cosponsored bill to abolish the H-1B program in 2003-2004
Rep. Tancredo cosponsored H.R. 2688, a bill to abolish the H-1B visa program. Introduced by Rep. Tom Tancredo, H.R. 2688 would have put an end to the H-1B foreign-worker importation program that primarily allocates visas to high-tech workers. The annual cap of 195,000 on H-1B visas returned to its previous level of 65,000 in October of 2003.

====Excerpts Numbers USA ends==========

Search H-1b at Numbers USA page on Tom Tancredo to find info on his record with links to House.gov.

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=CO&VIPID=146

WaPo article

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601814.html
House Votes to Toughen Laws on Immigration
One Setback for Bush: No Guest-Worker Plan

By Jonathan Weisman

Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 17, 2005; Page A01

http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm

H-1B are part of non-immigrant admissions. For the US government, immigrant means here to stay permanently. Even though most H-1B’s do, they represent they are here temporarily.

2005 Admission Numbers Page 3 of pdf:

The following are the flow for 2005, not the stock of total H-1B’s in the US in 2005, which was larger.

Temporary workers/trainees and families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .883,706

Specialty occupations (H-1B). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407,418

Spouses/children of H-1, H-2, and H-3 workers (H-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130,145

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/2005_NI_rpt.pdf

Edwin Rubenstein discusses these immigration numbers at Vdare

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/070731_nd.htm

see also his displacement index

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/08/03/july-jobs-american-worker-displacement-resumes/

Search h-1b Tom Tancredo

%d bloggers like this: