Archive for September, 2007

Simon Woolley: UK Collapse without migrants

September 30, 2007

Leader backs frontbencher over views on BNP votersTania Branigan, political Correspondent
Monday October 1, 2007
The Guardian

David Cameron yesterday backed a Tory frontbencher who sparked controversy by claiming that BNP voters had “some very legitimate views on race and crime”.

Race relations campaigners attacked Sayeeda Warsi’s comments, but the shadow community cohesion minister insisted she was no apologist for the BNP.

Simon Woolley of Operation Black Vote responded: “Pandering to the racist views peddled by the BNP and bought by the BNP voters is wrong … this country would collapse if it wasn’t for migrant workers.

Labour minister Phil Woolas warned: “You have to acknowledge the fears that people have that make them vote for the BNP. But effectively to endorse the BNP’s views is shocking.”,,2180764,00.html

“this country would collapse if it wasn’t for migrant workers.”

Everything they say about immigration and BNP should be presumed false after they say this. The only migrant labour that Britain has ever needed was the US army, navy and air corps during World War II.


Actually, its a theorem that one way migration causes genetic replacement. The theorem and graphs on fertility showing immigration depresses fertility in the US and UK is below:

== Contacting your Member of Parliament

==Fax Congress on immigration in US



Iran War Fatwa Hypothesis IWFH

September 30, 2007

Iran may have already prepared a secret finding, i.e. fatwa, that the Islamic Republic of Iran is at war with the United States and NATO. Iran doesn’t do anything without a ruling that it is Islamic, consistent with Islam to commanded by Islam. Iran is supplying arms to insurgents in Iraq. Thus Iran had to have prepared a finding that this was Islamic. Thus Iran has approved a finding that it is at war with the United States.

If Islam requires the Islamic Republic of Iran fight the U.S. in Iraq it would also command that the Islamic Republic fight the U.S. in Afghanistan. So the finding that Iran was at war with the U.S. in Iraq would also find that Iran was at war with the U.S. in Afghanistan.

If Islam requires the Islamic Republic to be at war with the U.S. in Afghanistan it also requires that it be at war with NATO, the military embodiment of Christendom as well. Thus Iran has prepared and approved a finding that the Islamic Republic of Iran is at war with the United States and NATO. This finding likely applies world wide, i.e. slay them where you can find them. But for tactical reasons they may limit operations to Iraq and Afghanistan for now.

We can apply to other incidents the principle that Iran doesn’t do anything without a legal finding that it is Islamic. After the students took the U.S. embassy in Nov 1979, Iran’s government subsequently took over the operation. It likely made a finding at that time that this was Islamic. From that time on, the government of Iran declared the U.S. the Great Satan. That phrase and the constant teaching of it in schools required a written finding.

This finding was likely made or approved by Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran from Dec 3, 1979 to June 4, 1989 . When Khomeini died, the Islamic Republic of Iran said it could not rescind the fatwa issued by Khomeini to kill Rushdie. That was a finding by Khomonei that Islam required Rushdie to be killed. The government of Iran said that this finding could not be reversed after Khomeini’s death.

Attempts to revoke the fatwa

On September 24, 1998, as a precondition to the restoration of diplomatic relations with Britain, the Iranian government, then headed by moderate Mohammad Khatami, gave a public commitment that it would it would “neither support nor hinder assassination operations on Rushdie.”[77][78] But the hardliners in Iran have continued to reaffirm the death sentence.[79] In early 2005, Khomeini’s fatwa was reaffirmed by Iran’s spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a message to Muslim pilgrims making the annual pilgrimage to Mecca.[80] Additionally, the Revolutionary Guards have declared that the death sentence on him is still valid.[81] Iran has rejected requests to withdraw the fatwa on the basis that only the person who issued it may withdraw it[80], with Ruhollah Khomeini having died in 1989.

A finding in 1979 or 1980 by Ayatollah Khomeini that Islam put the Islamic Republic of Iran at war with the United States, and that it designated the United States as the Great Satan, could also not be reversed after Ayatollah Khomeini’s death. Thus the Islamic Republic of Iran is at war with the United States and this war can’t be stopped. At most they can make a truce, but Islam prohibits the Islamic Republic making peace with the United States.

The designation of the United States as the Great Satan during Khomeini’s tenure as Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic would have required a fatwa issued or approved by Khomeini. This was taught to school children. Thus this fatwa too can not be revoked. Thus Iran can not make peace with the United States, NATO or the IAEA. They are tainted by the Great Satan.

To repeat the above argument, the Great Satan is not just a funny name. To teach it in schools and use it in parades in the 1980’s, and during the hostage situation at the U.S. embassy, the Islamic Republic had to issue a written finding that the U.S. was the Great Satan. This finding would have required the approval of Ayatollah Khomonei. This would be a finding that Islam made the U.S. the Great Satan. This could not be reversed after the death of Ayatollah Khomeini.

The following links make clear that a finding by Grand Ayatollah (marja) Khomeini as Supreme Leader of Iran can not be revoked. The identification of the United States as the Great Satan was likely a fatwa issued by Khomeini. That was a declaration of war and a finding that it was commanded by Islam. Thus the United States has been at war with the Islamic Republic and this war can not be stopped by any authority under the Islamic Republic.

The finding that the United States is the Great Satan and that the Islamic Republic is at war with it leads to the conclusion that this is the time of the return of the last Imam. This is why the President of Iran believes in that coming. This is the time for the climactic battle of good and evil. This is not just the view of the President of Iran, but a finding made by Grand Ayatollah (marja) Khomeini. It can not be reversed.

We call the above analysis the Iran War Fatwa Hypothesis (IFWH). It could also be called the Great Satan Fatwa Hypothesis (GSFH). The IFWH or GSFH if true imply that the U.S., NATO, and the West are in an irrevocable war with the Islamic Republic. This war is commanded by Islam. The U.S. is the Great Satan and this is the time of the final climactic battle of good and evil.

The U.S. can not continue to fight Iran in Afghanistan and give up its position in Iraq in these circumstances. Since Iran is at war with us, and has been since 1979, and this is an irrevocable war, we should not give up our position on both sides of Iran. Instead we have to draft 2 million men and invade Iran. There is now nothing more to talk about. This war must remove the Islamic Republic of Iran and substitute a non-religious government. The mullahs must be put in prison at Gitmo since there is no way for them to make peace with the United States, the Great Satan, ever. This applies to all the clerics in Iran. None of them can make peace with the Great Satan. Instead they are commanded to be martyrs in the fight with the Great Satan.

The President of Iran’s statements and evasions while on his trip to the United States are consistent with all of the above. Christiane Amanpour as part of CNN’s Special Investigative Unit, SIU, did a special, Ahmadinejad, Soldier of God, on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s trip to the United States and speech at Columbia University and the U.N. This special showed that Iranians are willing to be martyrs for Islam against the West.

Other articles on this trip: are at war with the Islamic Republic of Iran. We are on both sides of Iran now. That war can never be revoked by the Islamic Republic. No cleric in Iran can ever make peace, but must become a martyr against the United States. The same applies to all Shiites, including those in Iraq, and in Western lands.

==Added 2 Oct 2007 10:26 PM New York Sun 2006 analysis

New York Sun Editorial
May 11, 2006

President Ahmadinejad’s letter to President Bush, widely interpreted as a peaceful overture, is in fact a declaration of war. The key sentence in the letter is the closing salutation. In an eight-page text of the letter being circulated by the Council on Foreign Relations, it is left untranslated and rendered as “Vasalam Ala Man Ataba’al hoda.” What this means is “Peace only unto those who follow the true path.”

It is a phrase with historical significance in Islam, for, according to Islamic tradition, in year six of the Hejira – the late 620s – the prophet Mohammad sent letters to the Byzantine emperor and the Sassanid emperor telling them to convert to the true faith of Islam or be conquered. The letters included the same phrase that President Ahmadinejad used to conclude his letter to Mr. Bush. For Mohammad, the letters were a prelude to a Muslim offensive, a war launched for the purpose of imposing Islamic rule over infidels.

Much of the rest of Ahmadinejad’s letter is devoted to portraying Mr. Bush as an infidel. Given that Mr. Bush is not about to convert to Islam, what the letter presages is, if anything, an Islamic attack.

This is draft. The above is hypotheses or speculation. It is subject to revision.

“I am British” ethnocide

September 30, 2007

The increasing ethnic diversity of British society means it is difficult to define what makes someone British.

Prime Minister Tony Blair says that “blood alone” does not define national identity and that modern Britain was shaped by a “rich mix of all different ethnic and religious origins”.

The idea of Britishness as a unique and proud concept is out of date, embarrassing and downright rude to other people with different ethnic backgrounds. Heritage and culture are not important in this modern and enlightened age. The future is important – my future, your future and the future of society as a whole. People need to be more aware of themselves, their capabilities and achievements and not to live in the past.
Paul M Deakins, Manchester, UK

When I was growing up I had a great sense of pride in my country, Britain, where I was born. Since I have studied history I have realised that the truth is that we have no more and no less reason pride than any other nation.

Randy, UK

Search “I am British”

What ethnic group do people with ancestors in the British Isles belong to? Do people from Pakistani have Pakistani ethnicity and are British too? But people whose ancestry is in the BritishIsles now belong to no ethnic group at all?

How can an ethnic group cease to exist, other than by exterminating its members or pursuing policies that will shortly do so?

search Stephen Oppenheimer Origins British

In his 2006 book The Origins of the British, Oppenheimer argued that neither Anglo-Saxons nor Celts had much impact on the genetics of the inhabitants of the British Isles, and that British ancestry mainly traces back to the Paelolithic Iberian people, now represented by Basques, instead. He published an introduction to his book in Prospect magazine.[1]

Oppenheimer uses genetic studies to give an insight into the genetic origins of people in the British Isles and speculates on how to match this evidence with linguistic and archaeological data to give insights into the origins of Britain, the Celts, the Vikings and the English. He breaks down the R1b haplogroup into a detailed set of clans that are undefined.

Countries are usually named after ethnic groups. Ethnic groups are seldom named after legal entities. Nationalism is the doctrine that a state as a legal entity corresponds to a nation, i.e. a group of people. A nation is not a legal entity, its a group of people connected by common ancestry and culture. Britain is named after the ethnic group British. The ethnic group British came first and Britain as the name of a legal entity came second. In Latin, one had Brittania.

When Romans moved to Britain they didn’t stop calling themselves Roman and start calling themselves British. Britannicus doesn’t mean British it means conquered Britain.

Two years later, in 43, Claudius was granted the honorific “Britannicus” by the senate as a reward for his conquest of Britain. The emperor refused it for himself, but accepted it on behalf of his young son. This is the name by which the boy became known to posterity. According to Suetonius, Claudius doted extensively on Britannicus.

Someone who moves to Britain has as much right to call themselves Britannicus as British. In fact more right. Because Britannicus means conqueror of Britain. The Senate of Rome was not saying to Claudius that they had discovered in old genealogy records at the census that he was from Britain. They were saying he was named Britannicus for conquering Britain. So Britannicus would be a better name for a person who immigrates to Britain if a man, and Britannica if a woman. An alternative name would be Britannican. Britannican could also be used as an adjective. It would mean a non-British UK citizen. An alternative to that might by UKer or UKon or UKian.

US Census

Self-identified ethnicity in the US Census:

British 1,085,720
English 24,515,138
Scotch-Irish 4,319,232
Scottish 4,890,581
US Census Codes






They also have codes for Native American


Note that the US Census has different codes for Native American and British. Why? Are they racist?

I have at last got my hands on C. Capelli et al.: A Y Chromosome Census of the British Isles, Current Biology, vol. 13, 979-984, 27 May 2003.

The other controversial conclusion is that the German/Danish element in southern England (south of the Thames) is limited, and that the male ancestry of this area ‘appears to be predominantly indigenous’.

British DNA migrations Anglo Saxon

Britain DNA immigration

By Shawn Chang

We, the Voice of Britain’s Skilled Immigrants (VBSI) hold the view that the retrospective application of the changes of the rules to existing WP and HSMP visa holders is unfair and unjust.

Identifying British nationality by DNA:,,1366117,00.html

‘I am British. It’s a blessing, really’
Iman Naji is studying French with European Studies and Spanish at Surrey University. She hopes to become a languages teacher for disabled children

Friday December 3, 2004
Guardian Unlimited

I’ve only ever lived in Britain. I go back to Morocco every summer as a holiday but I can never see myself living there. I’m too used to London, I suppose. If I’m sitting down with my friends we look like a Benetton advert. We’re all in the same boat. It doesn’t seem that people are that interested in where my family is from. When you hear me speaking, you can’t tell where they are from.

I am British, but when you go into my house and you hear the language and look at the walls and you see verses of Qur’an and the food that we eat, it reminds you of where you’re from. So you are with that all the time.

I have been fasting since the age of 13. I pray. I don’t wear the hijab, but I will eventually wear it one day.

I do think being Muslim and being British are conflicting areas. Britain as a whole is multicultural.

So being Muslim is not multicultural but conflicts with multicultural.


In population genetics, the case of one way migration is often treated in what is called the “Island Model”.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.

The above implies that if you have two genes in some frequency in the immigrant population, that under one way migration that frequency becomes the frequency on the island.

From PDF, conclusion:

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

What this means is that the genes initially on the island, in effect, disappear. But the West is the Island, and we don’t survive in this model. We are being voted off the island by the genes of the immigrants. This never stops. Every cohort of immigrants is voted off the island in genetic terms by the following cohorts.


As the theorem says, immigration causes genetic replacement. The British Isles were not a nation of immigrants prior to the current immigration waves. Even the impact of the Vikings, Anglo-Saxons and Romans may have been small.

According to Stephen Oppenheimer, “The Origins of the British”, DNA studies show that the impact of Vikings, Normans, and even Romans, Angles and Saxons on British DNA frequencies were slight. However, this is not a consensus position at this point.

When non-British enter Britain and claim they are British and the theorem says that one way migration causes genetic replacement, we can characterize the immigrants not as benign but as pushing the genetic replacement. Those who come to a place and say the people there are not any ethnic group or different from those coming are engaging in immigration hypocrisy. The immigrants are engaging in genetic replacement as the theorem says.

When immigrants say the people living in the place are not members of any ethnic group, which they do by taking their ethnic group name as a generic name, then they are engaging in false statements on behalf of immigration. Since the theorem says that immigration causes genetic replacement, immigrants who take the name of the indigenous ethnic group as a generic non-ethnic group name are engaging in deception.

Notice these migrants do the opposite of what European migrants did when they entered lands. The Europeans didn’t say they were Mohawks or Apache. They didn’t deny that Mohawk was an ethnic group. Americans who go to Britain don’t announce themselves at customs as Mohawks.

But now the same immigrants coming to European lands who say all European migration in history or before history was racism say Europeans were racists who caused ethnocide of Mohawks and Apache. At the same time, they say that British is not any ethnic group. But the theorem says that these immigrants are causing genetic replacement and that over time this will be 100 percent.

the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

== Numerical Example for US

If US population was stable at 300 million and immigrants each year are 2 million, then genetic replacement is rapid. If people live 75 years, then 4 million die per year. With 2 million entrants that means 2 million births. So the ratio of births to deaths is 1/2. With a 25 year cycle from birth to parent, we get a survival ratio of 1/2 raised to the number of 25 year periods. So in 2 periods we have 1/4 and in 3 we have 1/8.

immigrant births

Births to illegal alien mothers—AKA “anchor babies”—accounted for a whopping 42 percent of all immigrant births in 2002.

915,800 in 2002 (22.7 percent of all births)

Births to immigrant mothers have quadrupled over the past three decades: [Table1, below.]

The number of non-white Americans exceeded 100 million for the first time in 2006, according to a just released Census Bureau report.

According to the latest figures, non-Hispanic whites accounted for 66.4 percent of U.S. population on July 1, 2006. Minorities were 33.6 percent of the total. As recently as 1990, 76 percent of Americans called themselves non-Hispanic white. In 1965, the American population was 88 percent white.

Births to white, non-Hispanic women have already started to fall in absolute terms. (Table 2) White, non-Hispanic mothers gave birth to 2,244,288 children in 2006. That was about 28,000 fewer births than in 2005, a decline of 1.25 percent.

Over the same period births to minority mothers rose by 2.78 percent.

In 2006 45.9 percent of live births were to minority mothers. That was up from 45.0 percent in 2005.

Here’s the next big headline (you read it on VDARE.COM first):

bullet If white births continue shrinking and minority births growing at the present rate, minorities will account for more than half of all births by 2011.

By 2021 more than 60 percent of births will be to minorities (Table 2.)

What the theorem says will happen is what is happening. Imagine that. We are seeing genetic replacement in the U.S.

Graph of fertility from 1800 to 1990 in the U.S. Fertility drops except when immigration was restricted when it rose. That was called the baby boom. So during immigration, fertility fell, just like the theorem says.


Suppose the UK had a population of 75 million, then with a lifetime of 75 years, one million would die per year. If immigrants were 500,000 per year, then one would have 500,000 births. So the genetic survival ratio per generation is 1/2. So in 75 years one has 1/8 of the starting genes.

A two-page report from the Office for National Statistics yesterday illustrated graphically how Labour lost control of immigration.

  • Immigration estimates out by 45,000 a year
  • Minorities fill 20pc of school places
  • Yesterday’s report puts the assumed annual net immigration figure closer to 200,000 – a four-fold increase in a decade.

    Because of emigration and immigrant births these estimates underestimate the extent of genetic replacement.

    At least 2.2 million migrants will arrive in the rich world every year from now until 2050, the United Nations said yesterday.

    The above is already surpassed.

    Net foreign immigration reached 340,000 in 2004 before falling to 290,000 in 2005.

    Graph of UK fertility shows drop since 1960. This is what the theorem says. Funny about these math theorems being proven right.

    The last decade has seen a 77 per cent increase in births by mothers born outside of the UK, with the figure climbing to almost 150,000, or over a fifth of all babies, last year.

    As Britain’s demographics change, Mohammed is expected soon to replace Jack as the most popular boy’s name. It has already pushed Thomas into third place.

    Is Mohammed a British name?

    Today’s “Times” is running a story about the Deobandis – an extremist Islamic group which control “more than 600 of the 1,300 mosques in Britain”.

    The centerpiece of the story is Sheikh Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq, a cleric with an intense loathing of the west and Britain in particular.

    According to ul Haq the demonic powers of the West have joined together in a concerted, potentially genocidal mission to humiliate, murder, rape and pillage Muslim lands and people. Their target is Islam.

    There are no white people working in the Immigration Department, that is why your letter went unanswered. A friend of mine spent 4 years trying to get a British passport. He had British grand parents, a first from Cambridge, lots of money, (he was a lawyer and an internet entrepreneur) but because he came from Zimbabwe, he was denied a passport. Never once did he see a white face when dealing with officials. He went to Australia. Write to your MP, in fact go and see him/her.

    The theorem doesn’t happen on its own. The people make it happen. This is what is happening. This is what its like to ignore theorems. You can ignore the theorem, but the theorem won’t ignore you.

    ==World IQ Graph

    Graph of European Fertility

    == Contacting your Member of Parliament




    Find your MP


    Enter your postcode to find the name and contact details of your local MP.

    Use the advanced search page to search by names, party, constituency or county.


    When to contact your MP

    Everyone has a right to contact their local MP to discuss issues affecting them, but they can?t deal with all your problems so make sure you?re going to the right place.


    Calling with a simple question might get a faster response than writing. You will talk to a relevant office or have to leave a message. Phone the House of Commons switchboard on 020 7219 3000 and ask for your MP by name. If you do not know their name then phone the House of Commons Information Office on 020 7219 4272.

    You may also contact your MP through their local constituency office. Addresses and contact numbers will be listed in local libraries, town halls, an MP’s personal website or through the House of Commons Information Office.

    By letter

    When writing to any MP the address to use is: House of Commons London SW1A 0AA. A letter allows you to explain yourself more clearly and in detail and the MP will have a record of your problem.


    The majority of MPs now have email addresses that you can write to our directory of MPs lists all available addresses.
    See the directory of MPs


    There is no general fax number for the House of Commons or listing of MP’s fax numbers – please telephone the MP’s office first if you need to send a fax. is a non-partisan website run by a charity which aims to make it easy for people to keep tabs on their elected and unelected representatives in Parliament, and other assemblies.

    This is a well organized website. You can cut and paste from Migration Watch or from this website or others in your letter to your member of Parliament or to use in a phone call. Keep your letters civil or your phone calls. That gives them more impact. The staffer may already be on our side, don’t alienate them.


    ==US You can send a fax

    The above have talking points for your phone calls and current legislation.

    Your ancestors and maybe your relatives or even you today are fighting for our freedom and our existence. They had to fight every day, they didn’t take many days off. There is a reason they call it “The Battle of Britain”.

    All we have to do is send a fax or call or write a letter a few times a year, but even once makes a difference. Be polite. Say you want to stop all immigration including asylum, family reunification, and work related.

    Remember, when you get angry write. When you get really angry, edit. When you edit so that its civil and fact and theorem based it has impact. You show your emotion by doing what it takes to make it translate into action, and that means editing. You will talk to staffers, who may already be on our side.

    ==When is the best time to call or fax or write?

    When its fresh in your mind and you can cite some of the numbers or references. Citing sources gives much greater impact. Copy the weblink for a source even if its not a live link they know you are backing up what you are writing. So when is the best time? Right now.


    You can cut and paste the above quotations from Nagylaki on the Wright Island Model. The textbooks in genetics are on our side. Copy in the weblink as well to the Nagylaki paper. We have to use the academic resources that are on our side. There is nothing they can say to answer this theorem. Push it. Push it hard but civil. The theorem applies to everyone, each year’s immigrant cohort will go extinct the same as those already here from future immigration.

    When dealing with your representatives or their staff never say I won’t vote for so and so if he doesn’t do such and such. Always make it sound like voting isn’t part of the equation and that you are just discussing the issue. Make it sound like you are positive towards your representative overall. You want them to feel that they can reach you and that you have an open mind on them as a person. Let them think your vote matters, don’t actually say it.

    No one wants to listen to someone who has a closed mind against them. So seem like you are mildly positive about your rep. If you talk to a staffer, by civility and tone of voice, make the staffer feel you are even more positive on them as an individual. Staffers may be of any ethnicity, but will likely mirror their district. If you have facts and theorems those will help you on your call whoever the staffer is. Calls have impact. So do letters that have quotes from science journals or other facts or data. Staffers are busy so you can actually help educate them. Not many are in the library checking genetics journals.

    Companies for immigration should leave

    September 29, 2007

    They should be delisted from all Western exchanges and have to leave all their know-how, i.e. people, and technology in the West. They should also be subject to tax. The CEO and board should lose Western citizenship and be banned permanently from all Western lands. On second thought, lets keep the companies and just send the CEO and the board away.

    This is just a joke guys.  We love our companies.  We just want them to love us as much.  If companies or CEO’s don’t want to be banished, why do they want us to be banished as employees?  It works both ways.  Companies want employees to love the company to the exclusion of all other companies.  We want the same in return.

    Baroness Sayeeda Warsi Listen to BNP voters

    September 29, 2007


    29 September 2007 21:33

    Cameron ally sparks immigration row: ‘We must listen to BNP voters’
    Remarks by Conservative peer on eve of party conference are labelled ‘grotesque’
    Brown calls ‘council of war’ to weigh up whether to announce a snap election
    By Marie Woolf and Brian Brady
    Published: 30 September 2007
    One of David Cameron’s most trusted and senior political allies has plunged the party into a race row by claiming that people who vote for the far-right British National Party (BNP) have “some very legitimate views” on immigration and crime.

    In an interview with The Independent on Sunday, Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, the shadow Minister for Community Cohesion, fuelled the already highly charged debate about immigration by arguing that it has been “out of control”.

    Lady Warsi, given a peerage by Mr Cameron so that she could join the Tory front bench, said that the “lack of control” over immigration was making people feel “uneasy”. She added that the “face” of some communities was changing overnight because of the sudden influx of people from abroad, adding that “the pace of change unsettles communities”.

    The Muslim peer’s comments, made as the Conservative Party kicks off a crucial party conference in Blackpool, will be interpreted as the clearest signal yet that key figures in the party want Mr Cameron to move to the right and return to what they see as core values.

    To have your say on this or any other issue visit

    Immigration… Immigration… Immigration: Cameron hoped to ignore it. But now it’s back with a vengeance
    Hailed by David Cameron as the face of the new, multi-ethnic Tories, the shadow community cohesion minister has reignited a debate that threatens to derail her leader’s attempts to shake off the ‘nasty-party’ image of the past and exposes the divisions between left and right. Marie Woolf reports
    Published: 30 September 2007

    Glance at the agenda for this week’s Tory conference and debates on the environment, the broken society and public services are advertised in bold. But where is immigration, the issue that once defined the Conservative Party? The answer: nowhere to be seen. Dogged by accusations that Tories have been obsessed for decades with the arrival of foreigners on our shores, David Cameron has tried his best to keep quiet on the topic in his quest to remould the Tories as the embraceable, “nice” party.

    Nina Lakhani

    Further browsing: Searchlight, the anti-racismgroup, at

    Note the link to the anti-BNP group

    but the reporter, Nina Lakhani didn’t give the link to the BNP website. Nor was there a link to the blog at Independent for readers to have their say. Wonder why?

    CNN SIU Murder in Hollenbeck

    September 29, 2007

    “Anderson Cooper goes inside an LA community terrorized by gangs – where thousands of law-abiding residents live in daily fear of stray bullets claiming innocent lives.

    Airs Sat 8p & Sun 8pm Sep 29 and Sep30 2007 Homicide in Hollenbeck”

    Anderson Cooper talks about the gang White Fence. One of the members says that he has a tattoo on the back of his dead and that he is at risk anywhere he goes. He says about this, “That should tell you everything you have to know.”

    A priest on the show says that when he buried his first teen gang member, “That is when the scales fell from my eyes.”  Father Greg.  Aaron Skiver of LAPD says Father Gregg is giving shelter. 

    If you watch this back to back with Christiane Amanpour on Iran you really see we are at war outside and inside. We need to wake up. We aren’t in the 1940’s of Ken Burn’s The War. We are now on the losing side of the war of our own time. Stopping all immigration, ending anchor baby, and deporting all illegals are required immediately. We have stirred a bitter cup out of our arrogance that we were invulnerable. Legal immigration from the 3rd world is a policy made by a teenage mentality.

    Iran Shiites want martydom with nukes not peace

    September 29, 2007

     Christiane Amanpour in a Special Investigative Unit report shows that Iranian Shiites seek martyrdom in war.  She interviews men who has teenage boys sought martyrdom in war with Iraq.   She talks to the mother of 2 boys who died.  The quote from Medieval history to glorify the death of their own sons and relatives.

    Deterrence in  nuclear war is based on each side not wanting to die.  A side that seeks martyrdom led by theocrats is not deterred by US nuclear weapons.  They seek martyrdom against the Great Satan. 

    This episode can still be seen the weekend of Sep 29 and 30, 2007.

    CNN SIU: Ahmadinejad – Soldier of God



    He wanted to be heard… and he was. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — now America’s nemesis. With his open defiance of the west, is he waging a new war?

    Airs Sat & Sun 7 & 11 p.m. ET

    Once one sees this program one realizes we have to use military force to remove Iran’s nuclear program.  We may already be at war with Iran.  Iran may have approved a secret fatwa declaring that Islam commanded them to fight us in Iraq and Afghanistan.   We can call this the War Fatwa Hypothesis (WFH). 

    Tories defiant despite new poll setback

    September 29, 2007

    “The Conservatives are now trailing Labour by 11 points, a new Daily Telegraph poll shows, leaving David Cameron on the brink of a landslide defeat if an early election is called.”

    By Andrew Porter, Political Editor
    Last Updated: 2:52am BST 29/09/2007
    UK Daily Telegraph

    == UK Guardian,,2180311,00.html

    Cameron meltdown as public urge early vote

    · Observer poll reveals Tories trailing
    · Brown trusted on key election issues

    Nicholas Watt
    Saturday September 29, 2007

    The true scale of David Cameron’s political crisis is revealed tonight by an Observer poll that shows the Tory leader trailing badly on nearly every indicator of public opinion. The poll also shows that voters overwhelmingly back a general election within the next year, with the largest number, nearly 40 per cent, backing a poll within weeks.

    Brown is regarded as best able to handle a crisis by 60 per cent of voters, compared with 13 per cent for Cameron and 9 per cent for Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell. The Prime Minister even leads on the crisis issue among Tory supporters – by 37 per cent to 32 per cent.


    Gordon Brown is disloyal by choice. David Cameron is disloyal out of ignorance there even is such a thing as loyalty outside of the history books.

    read more | digg story

    Labour’s secret plans to slash the Navy

    September 29, 2007

    “Ministers have drawn up confidential proposals to slash the number of ships in the Royal Navy, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose. In what is likely to be a “worst-case” scenario, with no further commissioning of ships, total numbers of what the MoD terms “platforms” is slated to fall steadily from 103 to 50 within 20 years.”

    By Melissa Kite and Patrick Hennessy
    Last Updated: 8:32pm BST 29/09/2007
    UK Daily Telegraph

    See how immigration benefits the economy. 1900 Britain ruled the waves. 2007 the immigration waves rule Britain.

    read more | digg story

    Conspiracy Theory Journalist Speaking Fees

    September 29, 2007

    Journalists who take speaking fees are walking conspiracy theories.  Russert takes 50,000 to 60,000 an appearance and strongly prefers a private jet to take him and his companion.

    %d bloggers like this: