Archive for May, 2009

Saving the white race is moral imperative of our time

May 29, 2009

Justin Raimondo at Takimag takes on the white race and its defenders in “Nationalists without a Nation”:

(It might be titled denationalists without a notion.)

He is answered by Prozium

Raimondo, Libertarians, and Paleos

May 28th, 2009 by Prozium

and also by Vanishing American

‘Nationalists without a nation’

The essays above are excellent as are the comments.  The following was inspired by them.


Race, segregation and exclusion are necessary for development.  The 3rd world is libertarianism in its raw form.  The 19th century was not libertarianism.  It was a century that built structure and order.  That was the basis of progress.  It was the West that brought structure and order to the 3rd world which led to 3rd world population growth.

Raimondo and libertarians who oppose the white race’s ability to segregate itself in its own lands are really opposing the large scale structure and order that the white West has developed.

This involves subtle balances.  The libertarians reject the check and balances on chaos that destroys order and large scale structure that is positive and human.  The white West found the right balance in many dimensions of society that allowed for its rapid progress.  The rest of the world and the other races are benefiting from that balance and have adopted what they could.

Immigration is the destruction of that order and the delicate balances.  Its a reversal of the effort of millenia in the West.  The West got close to it several times and then for one reason or another was not able to maintain that delicate balance.

Rome degenerated into an authoritarian empire like the Soviet Union.  Libertarianism seeks to destroy a structure of checks and balances in society that it resents.  Once those are gone, what is left is authoritarian and coercive power structures such as what Rome and the Soviets had.

The PC order rejects the elements in the West that are its superiority.  It in fact hates that superiority.  But that superiority is what raised the West above the rest.  Libertarianism is another variant of the ungrateful isms of ideology that seek to destroy the real basis of the White West’s progress.

Race and segregation from non-whites is an essential part of what made that progress possible for all mankind.  The rest reject that because they don’t want to admit it.

They seek with the race truth deniers to try to erase the superiority of the White West.  That has become a mission to erase the white race, because they recognize the truth that that is the basis of the White West’s superiority, the white race itself.

That the White West comes from the white race is analogous to the arguments for the existence of God.
The argument went that a watch requires a watchmaker, so the universe requires a creator.

The White West had to have a creator.  That creator is the white race.  That is what the rest know in their hearts. That is why they seek to destroy it, to strike down what is superior to them.  It is envy and resentment of what is superior to them.  This is the basis of these ideologies including libertarianism.

Now once again, the delicate balances that made the White West the garden of earth is again under threat.  Once again it is threatened with ruin.  This time the power of all it created is harnessed to destroy it.

The system of government, respect for law, education systems, universities, factories, market system, corporate system, volunteer organizations of all kinds and charity are all directed with a single focus to destroying the white race.  It is reversing this that is the fundamental task of preserving the White West.  All that it is depends on the white race being its overwhelming dominant majority.

The moral mission of our time is to preserve the white race, to keep it dominant in its lands, and to reverse the process so that non-whites leave and the white race is maintained.  The White West depends on the white race as a watch depends on its creator to be maintained.

The 3rd world’s chaos since decolonization shows what happens when the creator is taken from his position of power and made a supplicant in his own world.  That is the mission that liberalism and libertarianism have morphed into.

It is the essence of Luciferism as shown in Paradise Lost.  The libertarians and liberals are both the disciples of the Lucifer character in Paradise Lost.  They are both seeking to end Paradise and cast its people out, in fact destroy them to destroy Paradise.

Opposing them will require great courage, as it always has.  They seek to destroy what they could not create.  Their basic motivation is envy.  It reeks from them.  Raimondo’s essay shows that these thoughts are the essence of his philosophy.  This emotion is the spring of his movement.

This is what the West needs to do however to survive.  It needs to stand up to these would be Lucifers and cast them out or at least down from power.  It must stop listening to them and instead have a new birth of self confidence in their own race and their own right to exist and exclude other races from their lands.  This is what the White West must do to survive.  Its what the white race must do to survive.  It is the moral imperative of our time.


The evolution of large scale order requires the ability to exclude the forces of chaos that would destroy it.  It also means the right to exclude leeches.  The non-whites are leeches on the White West.  They suck its blood.

The elite universities have been ethnically cleansed of whites.  Harvard, Stanford, etc. were built by whites.  They became great institutions as white institutions.  Now the whites are being excluded.  This is part of the process of using every element of the society built by the white race to destroy the white race.

The wmd labs are likewise being staffed more and more by Chinese, Indians, and Muslims.  The head of wmd for the FBI is an Iranian born Muslim.   This is almost like the president of the United States.   Nuclear weapons are being spread by these advocates of the destruction of the West, not contained.  Bush helped Pakistan build more nukes and rewarded them for 9/11.  Bush ignored North Korea as Bolton pointed out.  This was under the tutelage of Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice.   Obama is more of the same.

The White West needs to restore itself.  It does that by restoring the white race to preeminence in the White West.  That means in practice the non-whites will have to go back to their own lands.  Only then can whites lead in their own universities and other places.  Only then can whites teach their children in every venue of society that whites are a great, creative and blessed people.  But that blessing requires a duty of responsibility to preserve the white race that the blessing of the white race can be passed onto their children and to future generations.  This is the greatest moral mission of our time.

Jared Taylor has been a great leader in this mission.  Raimondo’s attack centers on Taylor.  Taylor is a product of Yale when it was still a great white university.  Yale then possessed the true essence of elitism, the best of the white race.  That is now gone.  The concept is destroyed at Yale.  But it lives on in Jared Taylor.

This essence of the West, the white race’s best, is what offends Raimondo.  This is what he wants to destroy.  Destroying the White West is equivalent with tearing down Jared Taylor, the embodiment of the best of the West.  This is why defending our leaders who are attacked is a moral duty.  It is only by defending Taylor, James Watson, Buchanan and the rest that we can have a hope of surviving.  We need leaders like them.   We need more of us to do what little we can do.  Because these together build a movement.

The essays by Vanishing American and Prozium point out how the Raimondo’s and others have tried to expropriate the money of this movement that should go to building up the white racial movement to instead go to those who want to destroy the white race.   Raimondo in the end is looking for money.  His essay appeals to the antiwar left who are the basis of his fundraising.

Raimondo is selling out his race for money.  This is the same as the defense contractors who hire Chinese and Indians and give them our technical secrets that then go to their countries, their real countries.  That is where their loyalty lies.  That is shown by their words and their deeds.  We need leaders like Jared Taylor who are loyal to us and whose heart lies in the West.  For where your heart lies is where you will apply your efforts to build up.  And for Taylor that is here.  For the interlopers from foreign lands it is to their homeland and their race that their best efforts go.

So Raimondo in the end is the same as Haliburton.  He has adopted the methods of his enemy, race betrayal for money, celebrity and power.  This is where his heart lie.

The CIA contractors who engage in rendition.  Raimondo is renditioning the white race for money.    That is the same as Congress.  That is the same as Yale.  That is the same as the left, the libertarian movement leaders and the rest.  They are all renditioners of the white race.  They all tear it down for their own profit.

Is it any wonder that Raimondo’s spite should turn to Jared Taylor, the Jared  Taylor who looks the part of the elite leader of Western man?   Taylor doesn’t sell out his race for money.  Raimondo does.  The would be leaders of the Libertarian movement do.  Its they who are the heirs of envy and of leaders who led out of envy.  Those are the same leaders we have today in the GOP and Democratic Party.  They are the same ones whose hands are found in so many pots of money.

Jared Taylor’s movement seeks to rendition the feckless leaders of the West who have betrayed its people.  They are the ones who should be subjected to rendition just like Lucifer.  They should be cast out of Paradise and forced to think about what they lost.   Render them unto the chaos of the 3rd world that they seek to create here.  Let us keep the White West going by keeping the white race going.

Jared Taylor is right on target on that.  Miscegeneration of the West with the 3rd world is a crime against humanity.  It seeks to destroy what it took millenia to build up.    This super miscegenation is what liberals and libertarians alike hope to achieve.  Because it is this miscegeneration that will finally destroy Paradise.  It will destroy the White West by destroying the white race.

That is their goal.  Its the goal of Obama.  He shows it with his finger openly.  They do as well. The hate shines in their eyes and animates their heart.  This is what really moves them.  It is their fundamental animating emotion.  Just like Lucifer, their leader and hero.

The White West is the creation of the white race.  White racialists don’t have to show a civilization or culture other than the one the white race built.  The one still providing order, freedom and charity as it exists around the globe and at home.  The one shown in its full splendor now only in movies from decades ago.  That is the White West we seek to restore.  That is the moral mission of our times.  Jared Taylor has accepted this mission.  This is the new White Man’s Burden.  Will you take it up as well?  Will you take it up with Jared Taylor?  Will you take it up with Vanishing American? With Vdare?  With the others?  Will you take it up with me?

==Spencer at Takimag on Taylor’s article:

Jared Taylor essay at Takimag that has them all in fits:

A 2008 reply by Jared Taylor to Takimag discussions of white nationalism:

Interviews with Jared Taylor

Takimag has apparently removed public access to the old comments.  These had many important threads which are now taken from those who posted on them and from others to read them and judge for themselves.  That rendition of truth is the essence of the movement against the white race and the White West.  There is no West that is not the White West. There is no White West without the white race as its dominant race.

Paradise Lost is the epic of our time.  The moral choice of our time for a white person is whether to be part of the struggle to preserve the White West by preserving the white race as dominant in the White West.  No other issue comes close.    This is the essence of all politics in our time.  All struggles come down to this.  This is the fundamental moral choice each white person has to make in our time.

Will they join with Raimondo, Obama, and Bush to rendition the white race for money, celebrity and the approbation of the once elite universities?   Will they rendition the truth that when the white race loses power, the White West dies?  Will they rendition the truth that the White West is the font from which most of the blessings of the modern world flow? Will they rendition the truth that the white race is the creator of the White West?

Will they be cowards and rendition courage along with the White West?  Or will they stand up for truth and the white race?  That means the right of the white race to be the majority in its own lands and to exclude others?   Rendition the word is old.  It goes back to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and render unto God what is God’s.   Render under God the truth.  The truth is that the white race created the White West and must be preserved as the dominant race of the White West to preserve the White West.

Saga – Ode To A Dying People

Eyes shining bright with unspilt tears,
Thinking about all these wasted years.
Everything worth living for is gone,
Brother, i find it hard to keep fighting on.
Falling down towards the abyss,
The reaper embraces me with his kiss;
It makes me want to refuse to care,
To watch this all unfold – too much to bear.

If this is the way it ends –
If this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends – i can’t bear to witness

Disease encroaching on all i hold dear,
Somehow i gotta get my soul outta here.
Heart of agony, faint burning hope,
I’m finding it hard to try to cope . . .

Because liars own the world with conquering poise,
In a wasteland of meaningless noise;
We don’t stand a chance with dormant pride,
The heroes of our race have already died . . .

If this is the way it ends – if this is the way my race ends. . .
If this is the way it ends – i can’t bear to witness . . .

To imagine it has all come down to this,
Apathy and suicidal bliss . . .

It’s all over except for the cryin’,
With a whimper instead of the roar of a lion . . .

The greatest race to ever walk the earth,
Dying a slow death with insane mirth,
The tomb has been prepared, our race betrayed,
White man, fight the flight towards the grave . . .

If this is the way it ends – if this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends – i can’t bear to witness . . .
If this is the way it ends – if this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends – i can’t bear to witness . . .

Don’t let it end this way,
Don’t let it end this way,
Don’t let it end this way, i can’t bear to witness . . .

Also at White Nationalist Tube,

==Comment posted at Vanishing American (some repetition)

Raimondo is a denationalist without a notion. A lot of Raimondo’s donations come from the antiwar left. He is engaging in the extraordinary rendition of the white race to keep this money flowing. Same as defense contractors who hire those whose goal is to transfer the know-how to where their real loyalty lies.

Raimondo is the same as the neocons he detests. He is not loyal to the us that is the West. He does what he has to according to his business model. No more and no less.
Old Atlantic | Homepage | 05.29.09 – 10:18 am | #

==Comment posted at

Great essay.   Democrats engage in extraordinary rendition of white jobs for non-white votes. That is the essence of the Democratic Party.  GOP tries to be epsilon to the right of the Democrats. To defeat that strategy we need to have a party all the way to the white right.

Raimondo is doing the same as DemoGOP.  He positions himself where he will get the most money.  He needs left supporters money.  So he does like the neocons, he engaged in extraordinary rendition of white jobs and the future for the money of the far left who support his website,  This is just business for him. Same as for DemoGOP.  They position themselves where they raise funds.  That’s their epsilon delta calculus.


Justice Edward Coke v Sonia Sotomayor

May 28, 2009

Page 6 end of second paragraph (full or partial) from top:

“Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“Sir Edward Coke (pronounced “Cook”) (1 February 1552–3 September 1634), was a seventeenth-century English jurist and Member of Parliament whose writings on the English common law were the definitive legal texts for nearly 150 years.

On June 30th, 1606, Coke was appointed Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas. His tenure on the bench was marked by brilliant and innovative judgments in a number of areas of the law, as well as by jurisdictional conflict between the common law courts and the courts of Chancery, High Commission, and Admiralty

Coke’s efforts to limit the jurisdictions of these courts through the issuance of writs of prohibition ultimately caused James I to become involved in the conflict, and to assert a claim that he could decide disputes between his different courts, and even judge individual cases himself. To this Coke famously responded that:

the King in his own person cannot adjudge any case, either criminall … or betwixt party and party … but this ought to be determined and adjudged in some Court of Justice, according to the Law and Custom of England…. Then the King said, that he thought the Law was founded upon reason, and that he and others had reason, as well as the Judges: To which it was answered by me, that true it was, that God had endowed his Majesty with excellent Science, and great endowments of nature; but his Majesty was not learned in the Lawes of his Realm of England, and causes which concern the life, or inheritance, or goods, or fortunes of his Subjects; they are not to be decided by naturall reason but by the artificiall reason and judgment of Law, which Law is an act which requires long study and experience, before that a man can attain to the cognizance of it; And that the Law was the Golden metwand and measure to try the Causes of the Subjects; and which protected his Majesty in safety and peace.[4]

Your freedom today comes from the courage of dead white male Anglo Saxon judges.  It was bought and paid for on battlefields by dead white male Anglo Saxon men.

Spain was trying to end that freedom just a few years before Coke wrote these words.  Anglo Saxon men have been protecting freedom for five centuries but now the Latinos, Muslims, and others are in striking distance to destroy it.  All that stands in their way is a thin line of Anglo Saxons and other Europeans who have rallied to the Anglo Saxon cause of freedom stated by Judge Coke above.

Coke’s position on judges is the opposite of Sonia Sotomayor and of Barack Hussein Obama II.  The latter two believe in prejudice to decide cases for blacks and Latinos and Muslims against whites.  That is what Sotomayor did in the Ricci case.

The great judges of the last 500 years have been Anglo Saxons or other white men in the Anglo Saxon countries who adopted the Anglo Saxon tradition as their own.  Judge Posner should be appointed to the Supreme Court not Sonia Sotomayor.  Posner is the diversity candidate.  He never put his name on a book written by his law students at U Chicago and he doesn’t put his name on opinions written by his clerks.  That’s diversity.


Part of Coke comment above submitted to Raw Story currently awaiting moderation.

Also in comments at WaPo


abqcleve wrote:
OldAtlantic wrote:
…..Your freedom today comes from the courage of dead white male Anglo Saxon judges. It was bought and paid for on battlefields by dead white male Anglo Saxon men. Spain was trying to end that freedom just a few years before Coke wrote these words. Anglo Saxon men have been protecting freedom for five centuries but now the Latinos, Muslims, and others are in striking distance to destroy it. All that stands in their way is a thin line of Anglo Saxons and other Europeans who have rallied to the Anglo Saxon cause of freedom stated by Judge Coke above.


Keep on keepin’ on, dude! It’s opinions like yours that ensure the GOP will never rise again, very much like your beloved Confederacy. Please do not let my following observations discourage you from contributing many more comments such as yours above.

Having said that, I’m grateful for the timely reminder about Coke. Two things to note:

1) “On June 30th, 1606, Coke was appointed Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas. His tenure on the bench was marked by brilliant and innovative judgments in a number of areas of the law” Whoa there! You mean he was getting creative? I thought his job was to figure out “original intent.” Boy, I sure hope we don’t get innovation from Judge Sotomayor!

2) “…as well as by jurisdictional conflict between the common law courts and the courts of Chancery, High Commission, and Admiralty.” You mean, one of his great contributions was that he “set policy” for the courts?? You mean, just exactly like Judge Sotomayor observed our courts of appeal do???? Say it ain’t so!!!

5/28/2009 4:20:37 PM

==My Reply at WaPo

abqcleve wrote:

“Keep on keepin’ on, dude! It’s opinions like yours that ensure the GOP will never rise again, very much like your beloved Confederacy.”

What are some landmark decisions by Latina judges in the last 500 years?  Sotomayor in Ricci, that white men don’t have rights?  She upheld the lower court with a single paragraph.  That was in 2008.  She wanted Obama to appoint her to the Supreme Court so she sided with blacks against whites.  Is that whom you want making decisions?  She improperly said that baseball owners couldn’t hire replacement workers during a strike.  That was because baseball players were Latino.  That came from her experience as a Latina.

Compare her theory of judging with Coke’s.

“Then the King said, that he thought the Law was founded upon reason, and that he and others had reason, as well as the Judges: To which it was answered by me, that true it was, that God had endowed his Majesty with excellent Science, and great endowments of nature; but his Majesty was not learned in the Lawes of his Realm of England, and causes which concern the life, or inheritance, or goods, or fortunes of his Subjects; they are not to be decided by naturall reason but by the artificiall reason and judgment of Law, which Law is an act which requires long study and experience, before that a man can attain to the cognizance of it; And that the Law was the Golden metwand and measure to try the Causes of the Subjects; and which protected his Majesty in safety and peace.[4]”


Page 6 end of second paragraph (full or partial) from top:

“Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”


Coke’s opinion is why we can have judges and courts of law in the first place.  Sotomayor’s opinion is you vote for the Latino baseball players over the Gringo owners.  When before did a judge stop a company from hiring replacement workers in a strike?  That’s the right of employers.  A union doesn’t have the right to go on strike and then the employer can never hire another person forever until the union stops its strike.  That is contrary to the Constitution.  It gives ownership of the company to the union.  She sided with the black firefighters in Ricci to get Obama’s favor.  That is the opposite of what white Anglo Saxon male Coke said to the King.  He told the King to butt out of making court decisions.  Obama and Sotomayor say its our turn now white man.

“Keep on keepin’ on, dude! It’s opinions like yours that ensure the GOP will never rise again, very much like your beloved Confederacy.”

There is no point in giving up on the Anglo Saxon fight for freedom just because the powers against it are strong all over the earth.  Yes, Anglo Saxon freedom lost in Rhodesia and South Africa to be replaced by the long dark night of barbarism and the end of the rule of law.  But that is no reason not to fight for Anglo Saxon legal traditions here in America to survive against the Obama Sotomayor forces trying to destroy them and replace them with racist judges and racist laws that are anti-white in conception.  Obama hates whites and gave the finger to Clinton, McCain and called Palin a pig.  He did that all openly on video tape.  That is hate he can’t hide.  Fight for your freedom while you can. There is no value in giving it up to be ended on this planet by a tide who don’t care or even understand the Anglo Saxon tradition of objectivity and fairness.


Note how any defense of Anglo Saxon men, after being attacked by Sotomayor to La Raza at Berkeley, a racist organization whose name is The Race, and then deciding against white firefighters in Ricci without giving reasons why, is then attacked.  Moreover, he says that white men have to give up any rights or any nation at all.  He is saying their time is over, whether they speak up or not.  He is saying they will be ethnically cleansed and have no right to fight it and no chance.   He says that in a judicial appointee, i.e. conceding that the Sotomayor appointment by Obama is anti-white and part of the victory over the white race and its elimination.


In addition, the liberal at WaPo is saying you can’t say the plain truth.  Its a fact of where our modern legal concepts come from and who fought to secure them in the last 500 years.  They came from England.  They came from Anglo Saxon judges and were fought for by Anglo Saxon men.  Others it is true joined their cause and adopted their concepts of the law.

But now those are under attack around the world by opposite concepts of the law and judging.  Those are the concepts of Obama and Sotomayor and La Raza.  Those concepts call for the ethnic cleansing of the white race by immigration and not allowing Anglo Saxon men to even comment or speak up as their lands and rights are taken from them.  That is what the libs are fighting for.  That is what the Democratic Party is fighting for.  That is its platform. That is what immigration and uncivil rights laws mean to it.


The shocking truth: To assimilate into America means to accept the laws and culture of white people”

Joseph C. writes:

The abomination of Sonia Sotamayor to the Supreme Court, while disturbing, is not surprising to anyone who has followed Barack Hussein Obama’s career path and paid attention to his statements. What does surprise me is how the Republicans are “shocked, shocked” at some of her views.

The error that many faux conservatives make is one of omission. They state that a judge should apply “the law” evenly, that a judge should “interpret the Constitution” impartially, should not read their personal preferences into “our jurisprudence.” Of course, they never complete the thought–whether discussing affirmative action, judicial philosophy, etc.

The missing part of the statement, which many “conservatives” believe goes without saying, is that “the law,” “the Constitution” and “our jurisprudence” does not exist in a vacuum. It is the product of an Anglo Saxon culture from the dawn of the American Revolution times. Sadly, this does not go without saying, because unless it is said–and said again and again and again and again–it will not be understood. And true conservatives should not only state this but embrace it.

Yes, the role of an American judge is to interpret laws according to the Constitution–the Constitution written by white Anglo Saxon Protestant Northern Europeans in the 1700s. Yes, judges should apply the law–the law as written by white Anglo Saxon Protestant Northern Europeans in the 1700s, and as subsequently amended by a more diverse (but still predominantly white ) majority culture. True, a judge’s personal preferences have no place in our jurisprudence–meaning that nobody is qualified to be a judge if they are not going to follow the jurisprudence established by white Anglo Saxon Protestant Northern Europeans in the 1700s and maintained by a white majority culture.

When Obama speaks of “empathy,” what he really means is he wants a judge who will not be bound by a white man’s Constitution. In his words, he wants someone who understands what it is like to be a single mom, a minority, gay, handicapped, etc. What this translates into is that Obama wants a judge who knows what it is like to be a minority in a culture ruled by a majority, and will interpret the law from the viewpoint of a minority. Someone who will ignore the rules because they do not feel bound to uphold the white man’s rules. And when liberals speak of “institutional racism,” what they mean is that it is not enough for everyone to be judged equally according to “the law” because “the law” was written by only one segment of the population (in this case, white Anglo Saxon Protestant Northern Europeans in the 1700s).

Earlier in this thread, Larry G. asks:

“What exactly is this ‘richness of [Latina] experiences’ of which she speaks? Being beaten by a husband? Being impregnated and abandoned by a boyfriend who also molested her daughter? Living ten persons to an apartment with relatives who all entered the U.S. illegally? Failing an employment test and knowing–just knowing–that she was rejected because of her race, and not because she couldn’t correctly answer most of the questions? Or does it all come from knowing how to make enchiladas for dinner?”

The answer is–all that and more. Her experience consists solely of being a non-white viewing the law written by white people through the prism of a non-white. That was her prime qualification. In fact, I would guess it was her only qualification.

If there is one question worth asking this cretin during her confirmation hearings, it is this: “Judge Sotamayor, you took an oath to uphold our Constitution. That Constitution was written by people of a different gender, background, and experience than your own. Do you feel that you could uphold laws written by people so different from you, regardless of the impact of those laws on you and people like you? Do you, a resident of a white majority culture, feel obligated to uphold laws written by dead, rich white men, even though you are not white nor a man?”

==End quotation from VFR.  Please read the whole thread there.

Another important thread at VFR

“The left as an alliance of anti-white tribes”

Jeff W. writes:

You wrote: “that multiracial unum that so inspired [Horowitz] was a unum made possible by the anti-whiteness of nonwhites, and by whites’ approval of that anti-whiteness.”

Not all whites approve of the anti-whiteness of nonwhites. I know plenty of people who do not approve of it at all, and who wish that America could truly be the land of E Pluribus Unum. But there is a group of whites who are the allies of the nonwhites in their effort to seize control of government and use a tribal/racial spoils system to distribute America’s resources. Those elite whites want to participate in dividing the spoils. I might add that the current discussion about the Sotomayor nomination shows how far this spoils system way of thinking has advanced.

Tribalism is innate to human nature. People have always formed themselves into tribes, and the tribes have always warred against each other. I don’t believe anything can change that.

What has changed in our lifetimes is that the left has morphed from an international workers’ movement into an alliance of ethnic tribes and disaffected groups. The left now stirs up tribal hostility and benefits from the hostility it creates. This makes them more dangerous than they were in the old days when they used to sing, “Workers of the world, unite!” In those days they were working against the grain of tribalism; now they are working with the grain.

Rather than uniting the workers against property owners, the left now seeks to unite nonwhites, gays, Jews, atheists, feminists, government employees, environmentalists, leftists, convicted felons, the morally depraved, the poor, and any other disaffected persons they can find, against the remaining whites. (A good definition of PC speech rules is, “You can’t say anything bad about anyone in the leftist alliance.”)

I would also note that like pirate captains, the leaders of this motley leftist crew must constantly distribute plunder in order to prevent mutiny. Distribution of spoils is thus always uppermost in their minds.

The whites who are the targets of the leftist alliance can now be spotted at the gun stores, buying up all the ammunition.


Jeff W is really sizzling as are others at Lawrence Auster’s blog as well as Auster himself.  The discussion there has been the best on Sonia Sotomayor on or off the Internet.


The New Republic
The Case Against Sotomayor by Jeffrey Rosen
Indictments of Obama’s front-runner to replace Souter.
Post Date Monday, May 04, 2009


Identity Politics And Sotomayor

The judge’s thinking is representative of the Democratic Party’s powerful identity-politics wing.

by Stuart Taylor

Saturday, May 23, 2009

  1. bdbd Says:
    May 27th, 2009 at 11:00 am The 2001 speech by Sotomayor:


==Some questions:

Did Sotomayor decide the players v. Major League Baseball for the players to block MLB using replacement workers during a strike because baseball players are Latino?  Was that part of the difference between Judge Sotomayor and Justice Coke?

Did Sotomayor decide the Ricci case in favor of black firefighters in 2008 because she saw her only chance to the Supreme Court being an Obama victory?  She played the black race card to appeal to Obama to put her on the Supreme Court?  She pegged him right?  That is why he appointed her, her decision in that case.  She also issued no opinion in order to limit the ability of senators to question her on her reasons for that decision?  The other judges on the panel in the majority agreed with her in writing no opinion to help her get onto the Supreme Court?  The minority of that circuit said it was practically unethical not to give an opinion on why the majority came to its result.

==Excerpt from

Ricci and seventeen other white and Hispanic test takers, who would have qualified for consideration for the promotions, sued the city, alleging racial discrimination. The federal district court ruled for the city, granting its motion for summary judgment. On appeal, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Sotomayor, Pooler and Sack, JJ.) affirmed the district court’s ruling in a summary order, without opinion, in February 2008. However, after a suggestion[who?] that the court hear the case en banc, the panel withdrew its summary order and in June 2008 issued instead a unanimous per curiam opinion.

The panel’s June 2008 per curiam opinion characterized the trial court’s decision as “thorough, thoughtful and well-reasoned.”[4] The trial court’s opinion was adopted in its entirety by the panel.

Plaintiffs moved for a rehearing en banc, and the motion was denied 7-6, with Chief Judge Jacobs and Judge Cabranes writing opinions in dissent from the denial of rehearing, urging review by the Supreme Court.[5][6]

The Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral arguments on April 22, 2009.[7]


The appeals court was supposed to issue an opinion on a case like this.



Also interesting discussion with good links is at Michelle Malkin


[Ilya Somin, May 28, 2009 at 12:11am] Trackbacks
Sotomayor’s “Latina Judge’s Voice” Speech Revisited:

After some consideration, I have decided that Sonia Sotomayor’s 2001 speech, “A Latina Judge’s Voice” deserves more extensive analysis than I gave it in a previous post. I still believe that the speech shows that Sotomayor thinks that judges can often legitimately base decisions in part on their racial or ethnic backgrounds. I especially think that that interpretation is by far the most plausible reading of Sotomayor’s statement that she hopes that “”a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”


Sotomayor calls for prejudice and anti white prejudice in particular.  She calls for tearing down Anglo Saxon objectivity in law.  That disqualifies her from being a judge under an Anglo Saxon constitution.  They have to tear the Constitution down first.

Like Barack “give the finger to white people” Obama II, she doesn’t just talk the talk, she walks the walk.  She decided for Latino baseball players over Gringo baseball owners.  She made the decision that white owners can’t hire replacement workers when a union strikes for all eternity it would appear.  Once a union strikes, until it stops, the company can never hire another worker again forever.  That is until its Gringos striking a Latina owned company.  Then her wise experience will lead her to the wise answer, the Latina wins.

She decided Ricci in 2008 on the calculation that only if Obama could win could she make it to the US Supreme Court.  Why else not write an opinion on the case?  If she didn’t think she could get to the Supreme Court, why not take the opportunity to write her views of the law in the opinion?  Its because she didn’t want to leave a paper trail like her Berkeley speech to La Raza that she knows the Senate will go over.

She sided with blacks in the case to get Obama to nominate her. She wrote no opinion to make it hard for the Senate to stop her.  Her actions in the Ricci case are appalling.  They are the opposite of what Justice Coke did and said.  She says use your position to take advantage of your opportunities.  The white firefighters in Ricci were just there to be used as a stepping stone for her to win Obama’s favor by siding with blacks over whites.  It worked.  That’s who she is.  That’s who Obama is.

Threats to Judges, Prosecutors Soaring Immigration Hell

May 25, 2009

Threats to Judges, Prosecutors Soaring
Worried Court Personnel Resort To Guards, Identity Shields, Weapons

By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 25, 2009

Comment posted at WaPo

Comments that immigration is doing this are right.

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

Immigration creates a force that causes genetic extinction.  In fact, its worse than above theorem.  If we think of each gene as tagged with a serial number and the date it entered the US or today’s date, and when genes create another gene in the US it gets the entire string of numbers and dates of both genes plus the creation date, then each individual serial number and older dates eventually go extinct.  This is the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.  (Google it
for the proof and numerical examples.)

We are in a genetic extinction engine from immigration. Every gene here and every gene that comes here individually goes extinct.

“Ecclesiastes 9:11 (King James Version)

11I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.”;
The theorem catches them all.

The elites think the way you understand water boiling is you look at each molecule.  When water boils, some water molecules actually are going slower than before.  So the MSM says its a paradox.  But sciences uses theorems and the concepts of heat and temperature.  It is no paradox that water boils even though some molecules go slower.

Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973.  See p60-235.pdf graph page 19.

The elites think they are the molecule that escapes boiling. They think they have some sort of immunity. When they get boiled they are surprised.

Reporters lose their jobs because people can’t afford newspapers with 1973 wages.  They can’t understand it.  They don’t think they are linked economically to computer programmers, engineers, secretaries, women who want to be nurses but are displaced by H-1b nurses.  So the paper sides with the immigrants because it gives them joy to see the people they went to high school with suffer.  But the theorem catches up with all.  No one can escape a mathematical theorem.

Support NumbersUSA to free fax Congress to stop immigration. Support Vdare.

Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem

June 4th, 2007 Assume that

  1. Population is bounded from above
  2. The flow of immigrants is unbounded from above
  3. The survival probabilities of the genes of each immigrant are equal.


For any given cohort of immigrants at time t, the survival probability of their genes at T > t, p(t,T) must go to zero as T goes to infinity.

As well as those already here.  That includes judges, prosecutors, and congressman and senators who vote for immigration.  That includes activists for immigration.  That includes all of it.

Post a comment at Dan Stein

Saga  “Ode to a dying people”

An alternative version here:

Colin Powell joins increasing attacks on whites

May 24, 2009

Colin Powell has joined in the increasing attacks on whites that the candidacy and persona of Barack Hussein Obama II our first Muslim born president has made his life’s work.  Never does the one go anywhere or say anything but it sparks fresh attacks and demands on whites.  Colin Powell joins his own lifetime of resentment at whites, who promoted him on affirmative action.  This is standard for affirmative action hires and promotees, they resent the system and whites.  Its their own inadequacy they can’t forgive, so they project it on whites, the adult in the room.

Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and Obama show a lifetime of resentment and hatred of whites.  Obama shows it by giving whites the finger openly on video.

“Former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell affirmed on Sunday that he remains a Republican while asserting that his party should become more inclusive.”

How have pandering Republicans failed to be inclusive?  Steele is chairman of party.  Hispandering McCain was the candidate.  Hispanics voted for Democrats because they are anti-white.  McCain proved that.

The attacks on Sarah Palin proved that non-whites hate whites on the basis of race alone.  That is what Obama proved when he confirmed the attack as his own by calling Sarah Palin a pig.  Obama who won’t show his birth certificate and was raised as a Muslim in a Muslim country.

What Colin Powell is saying is that he sees the time to finish off whites.  He is demanding the country be non-white.  Colin Powell sees himself as the Nelson Mandela of America, sending whites into the ash heap of history as in the white farm murders in South Africa.  This is what Powell, Rice, and Obama all see.

Its what Eric Holder meant in his infamous Nation of Cowards speech.  That was a call for Rhodesia to Zimbabwe here in America.  Its the same call since Haiti revolted against the French.  This is the same call that made Rice tirelessly advocate for Turkey in the EU, so Turks could rape white women and end the white race.  Steele says the same things.  So does John McCain. So does his despicable dog, Lindsey Graham.

A very good article is here by Voting Female:


Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice aided and abetted George Bush to cover up the role of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and UAE in terrorism against the US before and after 9/11. That likely includes the 9/11 attacks.  They were indifferent before 9/11 and covered up after it.  They continued ethnic cleansing immigration including Muslim immigration after 9/11.

All of them joined the Muslim cause and consider Virgil Goode a racist and a bigot.  They think the same of everyone who looks like him or talks like him.  Their racism doesn’t allow whites any place of their own on this planet.  They will hunt them down wherever they are.   Integration is meant to do just that, to keep whites from organizing a resistance to being genocided.

They used torture so that they would be able to keep immigration.  More terrorist incidents in the US would mean the risk of stopping immigration. That risked the enterprise of ethnic cleansing of whites.   Colin Powell is the children of immigrants and he makes his allegiance to the non-white Ummah (nation) clear at every chance he gets.


Thanks to Patrick Cleburne for the link from Vdare.

Powell does indeed point the way to America’s destruction.  His indifference to holding the countries accountable for 9/11, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Pakistan shows that to him, its always America that is the problem.   This is what the Republican party has adopted as its way of thinking.  To the Republican party, patriotism means voting Republican.  The Republicans do need to be the white people’s party as Cleburne points out.  Their current course is to destroy themselves by pandering to non-whites as John McCain and Lindsey Graham do.

Cleburne insightfully points out how the MSM promote the RINO’s and exclude real patriots like Jeff Sessions.

Sessions is A+ in limiting immigration.  Support Vdare, they support our real leaders.

Debating torture while Pakistan builds nukes

May 24, 2009

Pakistan the country that likely was behind the 9/11 attacks in 2001 is build nukes as fast as possible.  Is this because they fear that the new administration may expose its role in 9/11?  As well as possibly the 2001 anthrax attacks?  Meanwhile the MSM elites debate torture.   They always try to keep us from focusing on what is destroying us, immigration, nukes in Pakistan, Iran’s nukes, etc.

The MSM have been saying for years we will just have to live with nukes in Iran, Pakistan and North Korea.  This shows they are basically disloyal.  They won’t fight for us, because they are against us.



==Older post

Hypothesis: Pakistan. Timeline: Week before 9/11/2001, the head of Pakistan’s ISI came to the US and met with US leaders to try to get sanctions lifted. That failed. He gave the go-ahead for 9/11 to al Qaeda in the DC area.

Then he met with US intensively following few days. US agreed to life sanctions and pay money to Pakistan. He then gave the signal to the anthrax team to mail the anthrax on 9/18. Reason? 9/11 was to turn on US concern for al Qaeda and that they needed Pakistan’s help to get to Afghanistan.

Once they got the money they sent out anthrax made from spores from a US lab to turn US attention to domestic terrorism. Once they got the money they wanted to turn attention away from Pakistan. It basically worked.

Before 9/11, there was talk the US might lift sanctions on India but not Pakistan. Pakistan already considered the sanctions unjust. The head of ISI was a fundamentalist and unjust in that context means its not just ok to kill but whatever it takes is required to do to remove the unjust situation.

Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001

NEW YORK: The Bush administration is preparing to lift punitive sanctions imposed on India for its nuclear program. But clearing this hurdle to bolster political, economic and military ties with India while maintaining even sterner sanctions on Pakistan would be seen throughout the Middle East as discrimination of the first order. Islamabad would be pushed in dangerous directions, particularly toward increased reliance on its nuclear and missile programs.

Further crippling a weak Pakistan, perhaps to the point of state failure, would invite its myriad problems to spill over into other countries. Islamic militancy, arms and drug trafficking and religiously motivated sectarian violence could have devastating consequences for India’s economic prospects and cause trouble in important Islamic oil-producing countries. Risks to U.S. forces and interests in the Middle East would be a virtual certainty.


Search Pakistan “sanctions lifted” 2001, and other similar searches. Toss in nuclear, IMF, etc. Pakistan’s central banker on 9/11 later wrote a book and said Pakistan was unable to continue w/o lifting sanctions. That meant Pakistan would have to give up its nuclear program but India wouldn’t. That would be “unjust”.

has info on Pakistan and 9/11. Can look up meetings ISI and US after 9/11 before 9/18. Also has an anthrax timeline.

By Sep 23 2001 Sanctions lifted in the news.

Pakistan knew that before 9/18/01. There were also anthrax incidents in Pakistan in 2001 after 9/11. Pakistan ISI was capable of getting anthrax from a US source and then producing it. Only Pakistan and the others involved in 9/11 could plan it all out in advance and be ready to mail on 9/18 from NJ and from Florida the fake letters to same people, e.g. NBC.

Only Pakistan had a motive to divert attention from 9/11 on 9/18 because then they had the money and sanctions lifted deal. Means, motive, opportunity, timing. It all fits Pakistan.

Pakistan also has the MO before 9/11 and up to now. In 1999, Musharraf invaded Kargil and said Pakistani troops were terrorists. India won and wanted to return the bodies of Pakistan soldiers, but Pakistan still said they were terrorists and wouldn’t take the bodies of their own soldiers.

Subtilis in letter tends to exclude Ivins

May 23, 2009

Re the 9/11 Anthrax case where the FBI has indicated they believe Bruce Ivins did it in the lab at Ft. Detrick working alone from Friday Sep 14, 2001 to Friday Oct 5, 2001.

Re the subtilis found in the letters.  Assume it was found in the second batch of letters.  This would be consistent with

a) first batch was disappointing

b) did experiment with subtilis in between and then did second round using that experience and know how.

c) Used same equipment for final anthrax run as did subtilis experiments on.

For Ivins this would mean he used the subtilis the last weekend September 28 to Sep 30.  But that isn’t time to do a full run from prep to dried spores.  That’s the same time as the first weekend Sep 14 to Sep 16 if he did it.  So he couldn’t have had a perfect run from Sep 28 to Sep 30 with subtilis from growth to dried spores.

The subtilis means someone did a practice run that worked perfectly.  If the practice run failed, you wouldn’t do a real run with anthrax, you would keep experimenting with subtilis.  So to get a perfect subtilis run he needed more than a weekend.

So the FBI would have to claim he did subtilis runs in the lab during the week from Sep 17 to Sep 28 and got a perfect run from growth to dried spores.

In this case, he was doing subtilis or anthrax constantly from Sep 14 to Oct 5.  In that case, it would have been noticed.

Its not like his lab mates had to remember from now back to 2001.  The anthrax was public knowledge shortly after the second mailing and they were involved in the investigation soon after.  So if Ivins had done an anthrax run Sep 14 to Sep 16, then subtilis runs during the week from Sep 18 to Sep 28 and then anthrax run from Sep 28 to Oct 5 they would have noticed.

The subtilis only makes sense as a practice run and they used the same equipment.  It only makes sense as a practice run if it really worked.  So they had to have time, which means they used subtilis from Sep 18 for at least a week to get a good growth and then get nice dried spores in the quantity of grams.

So whoever did it, was working in the lab with anthrax and subtilis from at least several days before Sep 18 to Oct 5.  That excludes Ivins doing it in his lab.


Ed Lake says that subtilis was in the first letters and not second.  In that case, Ivins would’t have had time to do a practice run and a real run from Sep 14 to Sep 16 2001.


Discussion of how Ivins could or couldn’t have prepared the dried spores in the second letter and added the silicon:’s-anthrax-investigation-have-been-raised-on-this-case-closed-blog/

The egg method so far has not been discussed:

Step 1 Have a chicken grow an egg, but first feed the
chicken silicon based feed.

Step 2 Inject the egg with anthrax to grow the anthrax.

Step 3 Hard boil the egg to dry out the anthrax and cause sporulation.  (Hot water doesn’t hurt bacteria method and simulates the Texas sun which can hardboil eggs. (Source John Wayne movies))

Step 4 Simply pour the powdered spores directly from the egg shell into the envelopes.

Mail at the closest mailbox in Princeton NJ.

(Some of the hijackers stayed in Northern New Jersey around 9/11.  An accomplice may have still been somewhere around NJ.)

Calling all the clans together to vote BNP

May 21, 2009

June 4, 2009 Vote BNP in the European Union elections to the European Parliament.  Vote for Nick Griffin.  Only in Britain.  This is your Declaration of Independence from LibLabCon ethnic cleansing of the British nation.

Vanishing American linked to this video this morning.

Wherever in Britain you live, vote BNP.  South North, East West.  Vote BNP.

You have to fight for your freedom.   Every person who wants to free and have their land free of invaders has to fight.   Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, and the rest are freedom takers, not freedom givers.

Your freedom doesn’t come from them, it dies in them.  They hate your freedom.   They hate British freedom everywhere.  They resent it.

They resent those who fought for your freedom in the past.  They call them bigots.  They resent those who fight for it now.  They call them bigots.

They resent your having any young ones to leave freedom to.  They call that diversity.  They call that immigration.  They secretly call it the end of you.

In secret they have stolen money all together.  In public they are stealing your land, all together.  Stand up for your freedom to say the truth.  Stand up for the freedom to say they are genocide deniers.

Stand up for your right to own the land, which means exclude others.  Stand up for your freedom.  Stand up now.  Take back the land that was not theirs to give.

You never know when the last chance to take your freedom may pass you by.  Freedom once lost is twice difficult to get back.  The same with land.  Vote BNP June 4, 2009.  Let that day stand with July 4, 1776.  Let that day be the day Nick Griffin is elected to the European Parliament.  Let that day be a new birth of freedom as great as 1776.

We hold these truths to be self evident that the British people are created equal and endowed by their creator with a land of their own, to hold and to keep and to exclude all others from.  That land is now in peril.  A great battle is taking place although few shots are being fired.  This battle will determine the future of Britain.

The battlefields of this war are fought on blogs and in minds.   They are won not on the playing fields of Eton, now enemy held ground, but on the play grounds of Birmingham and on the meeting grounds of Bristol.

This is a war that is for all the ages.  We fight to preserve the heritage of the past and the hope of the future.  No enemy has ever fought so hard to defeat.  Never have we been so deeply betrayed from within.  Never have the stakes been so high.  Our ultimate survival is at stake.  Without a land of our own, we can not be a people of our own.  We can not be.  We cease to exist.

That is the truth our enemies know.  That is the truth that those who come to destroy us know.  They come and come.   Look not to leaders lost to lead you.  You must lead yourself.  You must lead others.  History has thrust you into the saddle to fight or to flee.  But there is no where to flee.  Not over the sea.  Not anywhere.  Its the same battle in every land that British live in.  British must fight or die where they stand.  They know that and mean to take our lands from us everywhere.

June 4, 2009.  One of the great battle days of history.  Be there.  Be counted.  Vote BNP.  Britain past expects that every man will do his duty and vote BNP.  The men of history would not hesitate to vote BNP.  They know who is on their side and who betrays them in the midst of a great battle.

There is no doubt now that Blair, Brown and Cameron are the great knaves of the history of the greatest band of brothers to stride the earth.  Be part of that band.  Vote BNP on June 4, 2009.  Join the band that stretches over history.

The band that stretches back into the deeps of time when this race of warriors was forged.  This race of scientists was born.  This race of free men was grafted to this land to hold it forevermore.

You are one of that race.  Vote BNP on June 4, 2009 to preserve it.  Hand it on as it was handed on to you.  That is the duty of each generation.

Put your ballot to the sticking point and win this day for Britain past, present and future.  We across the sea look to you on this day to stand up for our freedom as we have stood up together in the past for our mutual freedom and survival.  This is just such a time again.

Vote for BNP.  Get others to.  Get them to the polls.  See that the ballots are fairly counted.

They call us bigots but they burn the ballot of truth, that they are genocide deniers.  Get thee to the polls and make June 4, 2009 a day that your grandchildren will ask you where you were and what you did on that glorious day.

You will say I voted BNP.  I got others to the poll to do the same.  I saw that the ballots were counted.  I stood in the long red blooded line that goes back to the beginning when men first set foot on this island and took it for their own.

This is my Britain and my people.  I fought for her in her hour of need.  Vote.  Gather the clans together to vote.  Make sure the ballots are counted in the light of day and not stolen in the dark of night like our land has been by the betrayers.

Make June 4, 2009 a day of victory.  Make it a day to shine across the sea and give light to Britons in far off lands.  Make June 4, 2009 the day that British stood up across the world and said this far and no farther.  We will not given an inch more. Vote BNP.

We are a great and powerful people.  When we are united, we can not be defeated.  History has proven this time after time.  When we are united right is on our side.   Vote BNP on June 4, 2009 for all the Britons in the world.  Vote for all the Britons of the past.  Vote for all the Britons yet to be. Their existence depends on you.

It comes down to the choice of individuals in the great uncertain moments of history.  Many on both sides have pushed their side to the point where history hangs in the balance.  Which way will you go?  Will you say I can only do a little so I won’t do that?  As it has been said, this is among the greatest mistakes we can make.  Your little counts.

This contest has now come down to the few.  The very few.  Not the many who are deluded or afraid.  We need you.  We need your effort.  We need your courage.  We need your voice.  We need you.  Be there.  Be there June 4, 2009.  Gather the clans together and vote BNP.

Obama America’s first Morlock born president

May 21, 2009

(Spoof) Barack Hussein Obama II was born as a Morlock.  His father was a Morlock.   He was raised as a Morlock although he denies it.  He was registered in school as a Morlock.  He was raised in a Morlock majority country that required a religious affiliation.  He bowed to the King of the Morlocks.  He gave the finger to Eloi.  He said America is a Morlock nation.  His books reek of his devotion to Morlock nationalism as shown by Steve Sailer.

Obama: I am not a Morlock.  I was never a Morlock.  Your president is not a Morlock.

The Eloi accepted that and even said it was racist and bigoted to bring the issue up.  Obama would never show his birth certificate which might reveal more of his Morlock identity or Indonesian Morlock Passport.  Instead he paid legal fees to fight the same case in many states, i.e. show his birth certificate, Indonesian passport, answer questions on his citizenship status in Indonesia, Kenya, Canada and British Commonwealth, which he shows such distaste for in his tacky gifts.

Sarah Palin was chosen by the 5th columnist Eloi John McCain as an authentic Eloi who would appeal to the easily fooled Eloi.   Which did boost his campaign greatly even though it was just an escalator for Eloi to be eaten.


This started from comment I posted at a thread at Nicholas Stix.


Nicholas said…
OAL, that would make it a parallel category to “Diversity kills.” Now, “race-blindness” and “diversity” used to be antipodes, but thanks to the pioneering work by mishmashologist David Brooks, the man who turned the likes of “Barack Obama” and his wife into “valedictocrats,” they are becoming identical.

OA: Good point. To pursue it in Auster terms, to the Eloi, race blindness is accepting the Morlocks as diversity. To the Morlocks its what’s for dinner.

==Use of phrase “first Muslim born president”  by

==Morlock and Eloi at Auster’s site:

Vanishing American article that had the first coining of phrase Race Blindness is a Social Construct.

See comments there along with those at Nicholas Stix.


And always remember, Eloi may hate you, but Morlocks will eat you.


It has been reported that what the Tricky One actually said was:

And remember, others may hate you, but they don’t win unless they eat you and then they digest you.

47 seconds final section, you can be the judge.

Full Farewell Adrress of

(And the reason Eloi will hate you is for telling the truth about Morlocks eating you.)

9/11 hijackers and anthrax connections

May 21, 2009

The 9/11 hijackers were around streets, schools, communities, etc. that had Glen, Green, and dale in their name.  Recall the return address on one letter was 4th grade Greendale School in Franklin NJ, but there is no such school.

You can do searches on the following themes

Glendale flight school Arizona

Glendale aviation school

Greendale school Maryland

One can also substitute other states they were in like New Jersey, Florida, Virginia, Arizona, and some others.

They went to all sorts of flight schools around Phoenix going back many years in the case of one of them, Hani Hanjour.

The “hoax” letters from St. Petersburg Florida, AMI as a target in Florida ties part of the action to Florida.

The envelopes tie part of it to the DC area, Maryland and Fairfax Va.  The hijackers were there in August and Sep 2001.

One hijacker is thought to have driven from Maryland to NJ in September.   (Hani Hanjour ?)

Some hijackers were in NJ.

The only people tied to Florida, NJ and Va/Md are the 9/11 hijackers.

One of the hijackers in Florida had the cutaneous cut that was thought later to have been probably anthrax. (Ahmed al-Haznawi ) That hijacker had a path of coming to Florida in June 2001 after passing around Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan, Afghanistan, UAE, Saudi Arabia, UAE, London and then the US.  So he could have picked up some anthrax and brought it from any of those places.

The “hoax” letters are unlikely to have been coincidence.  Ed Lake says something like 80 to 100 anthrax hoax letters are reported/sent each year.  That is every 3 to 4 days 1 is sent.

He says they are sent to schools, court houses, etc.  That is over 10,000 potential targets.  The letters to Tom Brokaw were sent Sep 18 from NJ and Sep 20 from Florida and so are within 3 days.  So that means 1 hoax letter.  If we multiply the prob of the same target we get 10^{-8}.  There was a second set from St. Petersburg and NJ the second time. So we get another low number to multiply into the first.

The J Lo powder letter the FBI claims did not have anthrax but another letter they hypothesize did.  Accepting that hypo as true for probability calcs, we get another factor of 10 to the minus 8 or whatever.  So we end up with
something like 10 to the minus 24 by one way of doing those calcs.

NAS should discuss different probability models for this calculation.  Whatever is done, all of the letters taken together are unlikely to be unrelated.

The hoax letters were written as if by a Russian.  The Trenton ones as if by 9/11 hijackers but as if someone trying to look like them but domestic.

I discussed in a prior thread that Pakistan could want to have used 9/11 to get nuke sanctions lifted.  In the week before, op eds supporting Pakistan were written by their allies in US.  The head of ISI came to DC the week before.  He didn’t get the sanctions lifted.  Several hijackers were in the DC area in Maryland, that includes Atta.

The go ahead call is thought to have come just shortly before 9/11.  So Pakistan could have ordered the go ahead after asking
for sanctions lifted the week before.  Then 9/11.  Then by 9/18 the US was going strongly to lift sanctions on Pakistan and give money.  So Pakistan orders the anthrax to look like domestic terrorists and divert attention.

Pakistan was at the verge of insolvency according to Ishrat Husain, central banker of Pakistan on 9/11 at the time.  Shaukat Azia was voted finance minister of the year by a magazine for the post 9/11 aid package Pakistan got and staving off bankruptcy.  He was then made PM of Pakistan while staying as Finance Minister.  He had experience in the US at a high level.

The Ivins theory can’t explain the link to the Florida “hoax” letters.  There is no tying Ivins to Florida at all.  No jot of evidence does that.  Ivins had too little time in the lab From Sep 14 to Sep 16 to do all he was said to in that time.  He had 2 1/4 hours each day to prep the growth media, stimulate growth, grow it, get it dried and turned into spores.  It also takes more days than that to do according to the government’s own paper that I referenced earlier.

There was anthrax later in Pakistan that year.  UAE and Pakistan and al Qaeda tie to bioweapons and anthrax at one time or another.   Pakistan and UAE and Saudis were the ones to know in advance according to many people’s assessment of the evidence.

All 3 of them would want to divert US attention away from the 9/11 attacks once Pakistan had its sanctions lifted.  All 3 had a stake in Pakistan having what was called by Pakistan’s own president “The Muslim bomb”.  They all had a stake to then divert US attention back to a domestic terrorist. Saudi Arabia and UAE had the money to buy the anthrax from someone willing to give it for ideology or money or the other classic motives.

There is really no evidence tying Ivins to the mailing.  No trace of anthrax at any of his locations, cars, etc. outside the lab.  He can’t have done the Florida hoax letter mailings.

Much of the above has a science dimension and is within the scope of the NAS investigation.

Pakistan had the MO for this type of attack in its war with India that it said was done by terrorists when it was Pakistan’s army.  That was 1999.  Sanctions were imposed on Pakistan in 1998 for its nuke test.  The same two people did the 1999 war and the coup as were in charge of Pakistan on 9/11.  Those were Musharraf and General Ahmed/Ahmad of the Pakistan ISI. Ahmed was in DC the week before 9/11.  He had to resign the following month because of his ties to the terrorists.

“The lie Cheney told about A.Q. Khan”
by Larisa Alexandrovna

==Excerpt quoted here:

In 2007, BBC’s Newsnight and the Guardian reported the following:

The Bush administration thwarted investigations of Dr. A.Q. Khan, known as the “father” of Pakistan’s atomic bomb. This week, Khan confessed to selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.

The Bush Administration has expressed shock at disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British news teams’ sources within US intelligence agencies, shortly after President Bush’s inauguration, his National Security Agency (NSA) effectively stymied the probe of Khan Research Laboratories, the Pakistani agency in charge of the bomb project. CIA and other agents told BBC they could not investigate the spread of ‘Islamic Bombs’ through Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.

Moreover, in 2003 it was Cheney and his team, including his former Chief of Staff I. Scooter Libby, who outed a covert operation tracking some – at least minimally – of the A.Q. Khan network. I broke this story in 2005 and here is what I reported then:

According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.

While many have speculated that Plame was involved in monitoring the nuclear proliferation black market, specifically the proliferation activities of Pakistan’s nuclear “father,” A.Q. Khan, intelligence sources say that her team provided only minimal support in that area, focusing almost entirely on Iran.

Although I was told a good deal more than this, including her then-most recent work on Iraq, I was restricted by my sources to reporting ONLY about Iran and ONLY touching on Pakistan. The nature of the “minimal support” remains highly classified.  I was also restricted from using certain words and still have not been released from that restriction.

==end quote from Rawstory


The Pakistan divert attention away from 9/11 after getting the money hypothesis is consistent with the letters.  The letters paint a picture of the lone wolf that the FBI is looking for.  The “hoax” letters and “real” letters both contain notes that lead towards lone wolf thinking.  It looks like someone trying to tag Russia or al Qaeda.  The letter from London to Daschle, also a hoax letter, also pointed towards a scientist at the meeting there.   Florida had also had a scientific conference in 2001 that some have discussed.

If Pakistan got anthrax from a US lab, then painting the picture of a US lone wolf would be relatively easy.  This may have been why they did the whole 9/11 operation, the ability to divert attention with something like this.  Although given their desperation to keep their nuclear program and get sanctions lifted, they likely would have done the main part of 9/11 anyhow.



FBI changes team, focuses on Hatfill; why?

Ike SOLEM: The initial FBI case was broken into two parts, Amerithrax I and Amerithrax II, which was a reasonable decision – one group went to work on forensics, the other on classic detective work. The field agents in the anthrax case did a very good job early on, even tracking the spores back to Princeton, NJ – and that’s when the FBI appointed a new lead, Richard Lambert. Richard Lambert took over immediately after the Princeton spores were discovered, and his tenure lasted through 2006, and he made sure that Hatfill was “the sole suspect.” I think the original FBI team (who only lasted for three months or so before being transferred off the case and forced into retirement, I believe) had the right answer, and everything since then has been a cover up effort, led first by Richard Lambert, and then by the third FBI team, leadership unknown. The sacking of the original FBI team and the replacement with Richard Lambert and the “lone wolf” theory of Steven Hatfill smells rotten. Who doubts that they would have declared ‘case closed’ had Hatfill committed suicide under pressure?


NYT report Florida anthrax not Ames

“Dr. Scott Lillibridge, the chief adviser on bioterrorism to Tommy G. Thompson, the secretary of health and human services, testified in the House today that the Florida strain was sensitive to penicillin and a variety of other drugs.

”That is not the hallmark of an engineered bio-weapon,” Dr. Lillibridge said.”

So they did actually have some experience with the Florida anthrax cases when they said this.

The 1950’s were a golden age is fact

May 18, 2009

Student Prince Golden Days Mario Lanza above.

These are comments from a discussion thread at Guy White and also at Vanishing American.

  1. I agree with Cabbage Roll’s comments and also VA, not to pile on. The conclusion seems to be get a LeBron t-shirt and tune out to whatever is happening. Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, see p60-235.pdf graph page 19. That is not a consequence of individual character failure. The Wright Island Model says that immigration causes genetic replacement. The mechanism is to take away our job security and job opportunity. This is a mathematical theorem that works inexorably.

    The takeover by Indians, Chinese and others of our universities, tech industry, banking, and government mandarin posts is a hostile occupation. They do discriminate and are racist and have power over us. Power they use against us.

    The ethnic cleansing of inner cities that has been going on for decades is occupation. The loss of rights is occupation. The bankruptcy of California is a consequence of this occupation. In the 1950’s, we were not being occupied. So it was a golden age in comparison to this.

    The golden age of Greece did look pretty golden compared to being occupied by the Romans and Greeks being slaves to tutor Roman children. The golden and silver ages of Rome looked pretty good compared to the fall of Rome and barbarian invasions. The population of Rome by 500 AD was far below what it was at the time of Augustus. Were people having hard times in 500 AD just examples of individual character failure? Or was it some larger process?

    What age is golden depends on where you sit. If you are in the process of being occupied by hostile barbarians, as we are, then the 1950’s is a golden age. It was an age of confidence. We didn’t think of India and China as our superiors. Nor did we think of Mexico as having a right to populate the US and to speak against it was racist. That would not have made sense to the Americans of the 1950’s. It shouldn’t now either.

    The reason to participate in politics is because the wider process overwhelms us. The Wright Island Model says that our genetic extinction is guaranteed from immigration. Character or not. The 1950’s is a golden age compared to experiencing genetic extinction from immigration and the evils inflicted on us by the immigrants to displace us.

  2. I’ll exercise the Cabbageroll option and add to my rant.

    There is a definite break point that occurs from 1964 to 1973 in our history. We were going up fast in the 1950’s and flat lined by 1970. Fertility crashed and burned. We really suffered the blows of “civil rights” and immigration. Both were responsible for stopping our upward progress cold. The only progress since has come from technology.

    Fertility graph from 1800 to 1990

    There is a huge drop in fertility from 1960 to the end of the 1970’s. This shows some powerful hostile force impacting on society.

    Graph page 19 shows that the upward slope of men’s median wages flatlines in 1973.

    The above two graphs document that the 1950’s were a golden age in terms of fertility and upward progress of wages. There has been progress in medical technology and other technology, but even despite that, the above graphs show that a powerful pathology hit our society between 1960 and 1970. That was “civil rights” which ended the white civilization as dominant and secure and renewed immigration. The bankruptcy of California and the banks shows that technology is not strong enough to overcome the impact of “civil rights” and immigration.

  3. Let me just add a link to the Wright Island Model. (More at link at my name)

    “We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

    Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

    The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

    Thomas Nagylaki

    Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

    Genetic extinction from immigration is scientific fact. Its a mathematical theorem. Experiencing it is distinctly not a golden age. Character doesn’t matter as far as the extinction goes. In my view, character is shown by opposing and reversing the conditions in the theorem that cause the extinction.

    That means stopping immigration at a minimum, but that probably means also sending our Indian and Chinese tech overlords back to their countries, as well as Hispanics if we don’t just want to see a takeover. Their invasion of us is shown by the theorem to be genocide.

    They also know that. They are not innocent to the genocide they inflict. They glory in it and hold it over us. They celebrate it. Obama’s inauguration was a celebration of it as was his entire campaign. The coronation at his convention was a celebration of it. That is what is celebrated on the t-shirts with Obama’s face on it.

    These are not the actions of immigrants to a dominant society but of occupiers. The entire system of PC MC, integration, affirmative action, etc. is occupation and ethnic cleansing leading to ultimate extermination of whites as the theorem says.

==I posted several comments at the Guy White blog. One comment I will add here. Fertility is graphed from 1800 to 1990 here:

It falls during all the time of immigration. It goes up during immigration restriction, somewhat delayed from the Great Depression. It reaches its peak in 1957 and then over the 1960’s and 1970’s falls dramatically. The bump up is the baby boom. The graph is evidence that the 1950’s were a golden age. The movies that Cabbageroll refers to are as well. We have also discussed the other movies that show San Francisco was a golden city in a golden age at the start of the 1960’s and isn’t anymore.

California was a golden country in the 1950’s. The movies from that time are the truth. All the evidence supports it. College was an opportunity for our people, not an experience of people from India and China getting the fast track in science, engineering, medicine and business. Stanford was overwhelmingly white as was Berkeley. As was UCLA.

The genetic force of extinction drives us all to behave out of desperation.  This leads to the difficult work environments and job environments that we all experience.  The legal profession is most sheltered from Indian and Chinese takeovers.  But as whites head into law, the legal profession becomes harder and harder.

There is also the unrighteousness of what is being done to us.  It is one of the great evils of history.  The bump up on the fertility graph is the visual confirmation of the golden age.  Opposing the forces against us is a righteous cause.  It is our duty to do it and reverse as much of what has been done to us since the 1950’s as we have strength to do.


The fertility graph may not be as dramatic as photos of Detroit, but they both tell the same story. The same as the theory.  We are going extinct. We are going to die, unless we reach our hand in with the icky spiders and pull the lever that liberals marked racism which makes it stop.  But we still have to get out of that hole.

Old movies show what our colleges were like before the non-white takeover of them.

They were golden days in the sunshine of our happy youth.  You couldn’t even imagine A Student Prince being about our current universities.     When people went to see that in the 1920’s or 1950’s, it was still not too far from the truth of what colleges were like.  Today it may seem like fantasy, but once it was close to reality.

Student Prince Student Drinking Song with scenes from movie.

There are many 50’s musicals that express the same message.  The 1950’s were a golden age.

Getty Images Hutton Archive of photos from 1800 to 1990’s.

Wimbledon images from Getty Hutton Archive

Berkeley with date setting from 01/01/1950 to 12/31/1959

Skating on Ice Rink Central Park 1950’s.

UCLA Marching Band 1950’s

UCLA History Project

The 1950’s really was the golden age for white people.   We need to tell young people that.  We need to tell them this was stolen by lies.  We need to tell them that the immigration that came was ethnic cleansing of white people, as was desegregation.

We need to tell young people that the 1950’s are their birthright.  They have the right to live in that country.  It was stolen by lies and crimes against humanity, a crime against them.  A crime of hate.  That crime has no right to hold on to its ill-gotten gains.  The 1950’s are the birth right of whites and the return to them is just.

Stopping immigration and repatriation of non-whites is a righteous cause.  It is also a duty to the past, the present, and the future.  We have a duty to civilization and generations to come.  The young white generation today that stops immigration and repatriates non-whites is the greatest generation.  This is their destiny and their duty.  We have to tell them that.

We have to show the young people the promised land.  We have to show them their birthright.  They will have to fight for it to get it.  It won’t be easy.  But it is within their grasp if they dedicate themselves to it.  We have to show them the vision.  We have to tell them its their right.  We have to tell them it was stolen.

We have to tell them that restoring it is their Constitutional God-given right, because reversing genocide, ethnic cleansing and invasion is a righteous and just cause.  This is especially true when its a barbarian invasion, i.e. one to destroy the most advanced civilization in human history.

It isn’t just a right to restore the civilization of the 1950’s in the White West, its their duty.  Its their duty to God and Country.  Its their duty to humanity.  Its their duty to the past, the present and the future.   It is a righteous, just and sacred cause.


The alternative is extinction.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Our goal is not to stop extinction half way or 1/4 left.  Its to stop it and reverse it all the way back to the 1950’s.

Stopping the extinction is not possible without restoring a society that cares about the survival of the white race and is oriented towards that mission.   There is not a simple reset button, but we have to restore most of what existed in the 1950’s in America.   This is not nostalgia but arises from the logic of nation states.  Without a country of their own, a people will be destroyed by others who care not for their survival.

The restoration of the 1950’s requires going through the logic of that society and restoring much of it because the logic of nation states impels the same conclusions and structures.  That is what the 20th century wars proved.  This returns us to the founding of the country which arose from the same logic as other nation states, a country to protect a people is essential.  That is the logic of the founding of the state of Israel, a people need a country.  They go together one to one.

Restoration includes a segregated society that protects and nurtures white people.  Without that, the society will genocide the white people.  We have seen that.

So when the 1950’s is restored, it won’t be restored exactly, which is impossible in any case.  But we will set up a government that won’t make the same mistakes.  That requires white dominance of the society and government.  Its fact that any other situation leads to the ethnic cleansing of whites by the non-whites and traitor whites.

All this has to be explained to the younger generation and older ones by those who understand it.  That requires showing what was lost.  That requires explaining what they didn’t understand that led them to lose what they had.  That means restoring as moral and just a white segregated society that understands its mission to protect the white race and keep it safe.  That means teaching that this is just and righteous.   All that has to be taught so that it may be done.

History proves that whites are ethnically cleansed by non-whites when non-whites are able to.  That is what non-whites are doing now.  This proves that whites have to have their own lands with their own government.  That means excluding non-whites from the white lands.  This is morally required because stopping the genocide of whites by non-whites is morally required.  This is the basic proof that whites need their own lands with their own people that exclude non-whites.  This was understood by many in the 19th century and for most of the 20th century.

It was understood by Ben Franklin and the other founding fathers.  They knew it and said it.  We have to go back to the beginning.  We have to set things right and not make the same mistakes.  This is what the Constitution promised.  Its the original intent of the Constitution. That original intent was not the ethnic cleansing of the people who founded the country and their being subjected to affirmative action, ethnic cleansing from Somalia, etc.

Read the Declaration of Independence.  It catalogs wrongs.  The things done to us today would be at the top of the list and are of the same type in some cases as those done then.  The ethnic cleansers call those parts racism, but they are part of the founding law and are the original intent.  They are law today.

==Declaration of Independence excerpt

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.


The wrongs done to us today are of the same pattern.  This means they are already a violation of the basic law of the United States.  The original intent of the DofI and US Constitution was that we needed to have our own country to protect us from this type of harm that others who are not us inflict on us.

=Additional quote DofI

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.


That describes the modern left and the modern US government.  Its already in violation of the basic law.  Its ethnically cleansing the founding stock Americans.  That shows its a violation of the original intent of the Constitution which is to protect the people and to implement what was promised in the DofI.

The DofI is a statement by and to the people.  Its a promise to that generation and to all future generations of what is their birthright.  That birthright is a country that protects them from the attacks listed.  The ethnic cleansing by immigration is the continuation of that. Settling Somalis in our midst is the continuation of that.

We have the right and the duty to restore the original intent and fulfill the promised birthright of the founding stock Americans, a country of their own.  In this case, this works out to a country for the white race with others excluded.  Only then can the ethnic cleansing of the founding stock Americans and other whites be stopped.  Only then can affirmative action and the other wrongs be ended.  PC MC is one of those wrongs.

The DofI makes clear that savage races have no place in America.  Its denial of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to be attended and inundated by a violent race that ethnically cleanses all others it comes in contact to.  Its the original intent of the DofI and the Constitution gives form to that original intent and is informed by it to protect and keep out all savage races from the land.

Its also the original intent to have a government and society that understand that.  It also applies to other races that seek the ethnic cleansing of whites and their disestablishment from government, universities, schools, work places, and religious places.

We can see why the left opposes original intent so strongly.  They use their tools of scorn and ridicule on original intent as being the slave of a dead hand.  We see why they oppose it.  They didn’t form that opinion before reading the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the writings of the Founding Fathers and their laws under them, but after reading those.

The left understands the birthright promise to the founding people was to exclude all that the left has done to them.  It is the original intent of the DofI and Constitution to exclude savage races, to stop ethnic cleansing of whites, and to have a society to preserve the white race.  That is set out clearly in the DofI and in the founding documents, laws, writings and practices of the founders who were, leaders and people, white.

This is why we must come back to this.  We must come back to it over and over.  Original intent upholds the justice of our cause.  It also upholds that its the law.  The Constitution is informed by the DofI and its original intent is what the DofI promises.  The Constitution promises to deliver what the DofI promised as a birthright.  The two documents go together.

The Founding Fathers and the Founding People never saw them as opposed.  Nor are they.  But to deliver the promise of the DofI and Constitution will require a great struggle by the generations coming of age and parting from the scene.  This is a greater time of threat and requires more sacrifice than any time in our history except for the very founding of the original colonies themselves.

The generations now present must be called to action. The clarion of history must be sounded.  They must be taught and reminded of what their duty is.  They must be reminded of the truths of history and the truths of the founding documents of this country.  They must learn or relearn the birthright promise and of the birth duty.  Those go hand in hand together.

Each generation present has its duties to the others and to posterity.  It is the duty of the oldest generations to tell the truths of history proven time over time and confirmed by the experience of ordinary life.  Every people needs its own country.  The white race is a people.

The white race needs and has a birth right to their own country.  That means the exclusion of all non-whites from that land.  That means a government of whites for whites by whites. That is the birthright promise of the DofI and Constitution.  That is the original intent.

It is now time to summon the generations now present to make the sacrifice, bear the burdens, and do what is necessary to actually deliver on that birthright promise of a country of their own for the white race, the founding race of this country.

It is time for the eldest to tell these truths to the youngest.  It is time for them to unfold their experience of life confirms the truths of history.  It is time for them to say that history teaches there is no other way for a people to survive, be secure and to enjoy the fruits of liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

A people must have a land and government of their own. They must have schools, universities and religious places of their own. Without these, the people die.  They are extinguished by others who care not for them.

This is the cold lesson of history.  It is what the DofI says plainly.  It is what was understood by the Founding Fathers and the generations then present.  It was understood so and transmitted by them to their children and succeeding generations.

It is what we were taught who are old enough to remember or wise enough to read.  It is what must be or we will go extinct.  There is no alternative and the evidence of our own time confirms it in abundance and in every land of this planet.  It is the duty of the oldest generation to tell this to the young and call them forth to fight for it.

It is the duty of the middle aged generation to lead that fight. That is what we must do now.  That is our duty.  We have no other alternative.  Theory and history and our own experience in our own time confirm that.  We have only to act.  That is all that is left to us.


All the generations of white flight from blacks prove these founding truths.  White flight from Hispanics shows they are an alien nation and can not stay in this land.  The ethnic cleansing of universities by non-whites shows they are alien and not of this people.

Original intent is the promise of life to the founding stock Americans.  This is why the ethnic cleansers ridicule it and forbid it to be taught.  This is why those truths must be taught by those who know of them.   Denying a land of their own to whites is to deny them all 3 of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.  All the experience of the past and today proves this.  Only the constant repetition of lies and the shriek hate attacks when a white says the truth keeps every white from saying it.

Its not white supremacism, its white survival.  Its the supremacism of non-white races to deny whites a land of their own which excludes non-whites.  Its the genocide of whites by non-whites to deny whites a land of their own that excludes all non-whites. All history
proves this.  Eveything in our own time proves this.  Our own everyday experience proves this.  Survival skills are this in our own daily lives. We know not to go in their areas.  That applies to all non-white groups.  They don’t want us and that shows they don’t like us.  It shows they are here to take this land from us and leave us nothing.  We will cease to exist. That is their plan and they celebrate it as it happens.

We know not to go in their areas.  But their areas are now becoming Harvard, Stanford and Berkeley.  Their areas are now computer programming and medicine.  Their areas are becoming government computers and databases.  They exclude us from all those areas.  They call our mentioning it racism.  Everything stops when we ask for what is ours back for them to call us racist until we wilt from the pressure and every white sees what happens.

This is the same as what happens when we go in their neighborhoods or lands.  This is their constant attack.  History shows this is what always happens.  A people need a land of their own or they die.  The non-whites mean to extinct us and to make us suffer as they gain more and more leverage.  Its cowardice not to stand up and fight now.  It will not earn any reward to keep silent.  It will only be worse to fight them later and reclaim what is our birthright and what is our due as to any other people on this earth, a land of our own to exclude all others, that means to exclude all non-whites.

This doesn’t mean we give them the nukes and biolabs.  It means they leave our land not we leave it.  It means they go back to their lands, which are most of the earth and have most of the people of the earth.  They go back to their lands and we keep ours and they are excluded from our lands.

That means from the schools and colleges as well.  Those are white only just like the country is white only.  That is the only way to keep them for whites and not against whites.  History shows that.  Once non-whites are let into the colleges, they become anti-white.  Whites are terorrized and subjected to fear and constant harassment at most of the colleges of the country, as they are in most of the public schools.

That’s the meaning of the indignities to whites that are reported and trumpeted by the GOP and PC anointed ones.  The meaning is not to get the GOP elected and PC anointed ones a steady stream of income from our outrage as we continue to suffer these assaults and dimish and go extinct.  It means we end the source of this assault, which is non-whites in our land.

They are ethnically cleansing us and show not the slightest hesitation to use every advantage they gain to do it.  They are waging a war of extinction on us and they celebrate every harm they inflict on us.  When they kill us, they call us racist.  When they kill cops who defend us, they celebrate.  They cheer when theirs murder ours. That is their nature and they can’t change it.  Nor can we.  That is why they must go.

All that they do to us is real and intended. We have to acknowledge that simple fact.  The conclusion from that is we need a land of our own. That is why we avoid their areas.  That is why we have white flight.  They call us racist for taking our homes.  Our beautiful 19th century and early 20th century homes that they took from us on the South Side of Chicago, Detroit and in every city.  They took them all and are taking more.

Now they are taking Berkeley, Harvard and Stanford.   The lesson is always the same.  Its the same as what we see each day.  Its the same that we read and see even on filtered MSM.  Its the lesson of history.  Its the lesson of the DofI.  Its the promise in the Declaration of Independence.  Its the compact between the leaders and the followers.  Its the original intent of the Constitution. Its the law.  Its violence to the law all that is done to us.  Its a violation of the law and Constitution and DofI what is done to us.  It won’t stop until we have a land of our own. That means their leaving our land to go back to theirs.

They call white survival white supremacism.  That shows they know what they are doing. It shows they intend to finish us off.  Each step they take they do more to us.  We are subject to massacres like 9/11 and told we are the racists.  We are subjected to the killings at Virginia Tech and the other killings. We are told over and over not to react that we are the racists and bigots.

The white who does speak out is the one attacked and condemned. This should teach us the truth, that we need a land of our own.  We need a whites only land with a whites only government with white only schools and colleges.  Its that or extinction.  That is the stark choice the non-whites and the traitor whites give us.

If we so much as raise the issue they stop all work to shriek hate at us.  That is why we need a land, government, schools and media of our own. Without these we have nothing.  That is what the Founding Fathers understood.  Its what they wrote in the DofI.  Its what they fought for.  Its what they handed down to us.  Now we are faced with the total loss of it and our extinction.  The mistreatment of us rises with each step they get closer to that extinction.  So its time to act.  Its time to speak out.  Cowardice doesn’t buy you peace or survival.  Silence doesn’t earn you peace.  They just take it as permission to do more.

We have to speak up for what is actually needed.  That is a white only land that excludes non-whites. We must have that to survive.   Its extinction or a whites only land.  That means sending them back, not our leaving.  They will never let us have a land in peace. We have to fight for it.

If we leave them the nukes they will use them on us.  They are many and we are few, so they will win.  That is their thinking.  Moreover, they show they hate us to the exclusion of all other goals.  Its what they want and crave.  All of their statements show it.  All of their “music” says it.  They repeat it endlessly.  Getting whitey. That’s their goal and their promise to their own that they will overcome us.

That is why we must keep this land and send them back to their lands.  There is no other altenative but total extinction and increasing servitude, fear and violence as extinction approaches.  South Africa farm murders show that.

This is why they forbid us to meet.  This is why they won’t let us have any meeting place.  This is why they took over the schools and forced savages upon us whose assaults and verbal violence keep us in check.

This is why we have no place of our own.  Even our religious institutions.  Even our homes at Thanksgiving and Christmas.   They have taken all of this from us.

This is because they intend to extinguish us.  They say it and do it.  Every chance they get they do more.  They never let up. They never show mercy. They never apologize for what they do.  Instead we are blamed as racist.  The one of us who speaks up is attacked.

There is a lesson in all this and that it is they mean to extinguish us and that cowardice and silence are no solution.  We buy neither peace nor security by silence and cowardice.  We have a slim margin to win back our security.  Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are all being taken from us. We have lost much of them already.  The final step is our complete extinction. They show no let up in that even as millions become unemployed.


We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.


Why don’t they stop immigration because of what is published in science journals?  Immigration causes our extinction.  Its been known for decades.  Yet they don’t stop it, they only increase it.  The above words show that they intend our extinction.  They have no mercy.

This is why we need a land of our own with no-whites.  We either have a country of our own or we go extinct. That is what the DofI says.  It says we are a people and need a land of our own.  That is what WWI and WWII show.  That is what we need now.  That is what we must work for.  That is what we must say we want clearly and unmistakeably.  That is what we must sacrifice for.

That must be our unwavering goal, just as it is theirs to take every sanctuary from us and inflict on us every tribe from every land on earth.  That is why we must speak up and stop being cowards.  We must not be beaten into passivity by those who hate us and want our destruction.

That is what the DofI says.  We were told by the Founding Fathers and even more by the generations before them that this is what we msut not give away.  They told that to the Founding Fathers who listened.  Now we have to listen to the earliest generations of Americans.

The first generations knew they were a people before they had a country of their own.  We must know it too.  Or else we die. That is what the left knows and what the non-whites know.  They intend to take all from us and make it worse for us as they gain more power.  From where we have come to this, and from where we are to the white farm murders and then we are gone utterly.  Its just like the theorem says in cold hard language.   A land of our own, i.e. all whites, or die that’s the choice.


What has been bequeathed to us is a fight for our survival.   Our position now compared to the 1950’s does make the 1950’s a golden age.  We are pressed far more now than then.  We have to really concentrate our minds.  Exinction does that.  We have to declare our goal is a land of our own.  Which land?  This land.  All of America.  All of our weapons.  All of our lands.  These are ours.

They must go back to their lands which are most of the earth.  That is what we have to say we want.  If we are afraid to say it, we can’t have it.  That is why the left attacks us.

They too study the 1950’s.  They too know that there were whites then who spoke the truth that the founders knew.  They too know that whites need to keep a land of their own. They too know that this means keeping this land for whites and sending non-whites back.  They know it because they study the 1950’s.  They study what is forbidden to us to read or believe or say.

They vilify our real leaders from that time constantly.  They attack any of us who stands up to say the same ancient truths.  They call the founding fathers bigots even as they pursue immigration proven to cause our extinction.  Showing them the article doesn’t change them for a moment.  Instead they celebrate it and celebrate our extinction.

The whites who really led and protected whites from the 1950’s or earlier are the ones the left attacks.  The ones who betrayed their people are the ones they praise.  Lyndon Johnson they praise.  Those who stood for their people are loathed and denigrated to no end.

But they didn’t stop with “equality”.  They took from us all right of association that they could then and have taken more since.  They keep doing that because their goal is to eliminate us.  They say it.

When one of our leaders stands up like Virgil Goode they become distorted with hate.  It shows.   The hate pours out.  The same was vented on Sarah Palin.  When Hillary Clinton was in the way, it went on our.

The one gave her the finger to the applause of his people.  The same he gave to John McCain and called Palin a pig.  The latest venting of hate on a white woman is Carrie Prejean.  But other white women are raped, mutilated and killed.

They say it isn’t a hate crime but a burglary gone wrong or she shouldn’t be out walking at night.  Because this land is one we are not safe in. That’s why we need a land of our own.  A land where we can walk anywhere.  That means whites only and excluding non-whites. Europe’s transformation shows that.  Our experience here shows it. South Africa shows it.  Its the same lesson everywhere and at all times.

They bludgeoned her to death:

They said its not a hate crime.  They said its no different than any other crime.  They said its no different to anything else they have done to us or taken from us.

They cheered OJ for getting off with killing another white woman.

The one gave her the finger
He called the other white woman he ran against a pig.

Then they elected him president.  He doesn’t speak for us.  He brings Somalis here to ethnically cleanse us.  To do the same as what was done to Anne Pressley and the other women and men.  Its the same as the white farm murders.  We need a land and government of our own.  That means a land of white people for white people.  That means non-whites have to go back to their own lands.   They mean to finish us.  That’s what the one has said and written his entire life.  That’s his religion.  That’s what his church is.

Obama’s first election was with the consent of Minister Farrakhan.  Wright, Farrakhan, Obama are a trinity opposed to us.   Its the same message over and over.  The latest hate was on Carrie Prejean.  Its the same thing over and over.  It never stops.


White farm murders (graphic pictures of murder torture of whites by blacks at bottom.)

Is this our future?  It is if we keep silent.  In fact though, this is not fiction.  This is the world today.  This is still going on.  Its happening here.

The Anne Pressley case that they say is not a hate crime was here.  The same people who launched the hate attack on Carrie Prejean. The same who launched the hate attack on Hillary Clinton.  They show no hesitation in attacking women.

They don’t fight by the rules of chivarly.  Those are just something to take advantage of.  Just like immigration.  Just like affirmative action.  Just like “civil rights” laws.  Just like integration.  Just like the OJ jury.  It saw its chance and took it.

The more chances they get, the more white farm murders there are.  The more finger pointing by the one, even after the Wright videos were exposed he was pointing the finger at John McCain.  He knew by then that he would win and his followers would vote for him even if he did it again.  In fact, because he did it again.

They never change.  Its a constant.  The attacks.  The violence.  The ethnic cleansing of whites.  Its perpetual.  Only a land of our own gives us a chance.  Even then it requires a constant effort to keep them out.   That’s what we need.

Silence doesn’t buy you anything but more white farm murders.  Anne Pressley never spoke out but she was killed for being white.  That was hate.  They are hate deniers. They are genocide deniers. They deny immigration is genocide. They cover up the murders and rapes of whites by non-whites.

They lie to the Kennedy Peace Corps recruits.  They send them to be raped and killed too.  They have no shame.  They have no mercy.

They just have hate.  That’s all they talk about.  Every issue comes down to their hate.  That’s why they must go from this land and it be white only.

I have had some trouble copying and pasting.  The entire comment thread from Guy White was pasted in at one point.  I have removed the part I didn’t intend to copy but it was long and I am not sure what I removed or not.     I also apparently copied in the entire article from Guy White when I did that and have removed that too.

==Comment at Guy White thread by AA Animus

  1. Old Atlantic writes:
    “Genetic extinction from immigration is scientific fact. Its a mathematical theorem. ”

    I think you’re overreacting.

    First, your use of that model makes a lot of assumptions, like an infinite continuous flow of Mexicans or Chinese,
    over an undetermined long amount of time. I get the
    point, but I’m not convinced that it means anything at a
    practical time scale, if we can stop amnesty and begin the process of reducing illegal aliens to a manageable level.
    That’s a big “if”, but if we don’t the model is pointless.
    We’ll be majority Latin American by immigration alone.

    Second, you seem to be assuming that any mixing is just
    plain bad. The Anglo Saxon race, which was one a race of
    world beaters, are a mixture of numerous tribes. Angles,
    Saxons, Jutes, various Celts, etc. I think this is a reason why
    Guy’s proposal on IQ (or an IQ proxy) as an immigration filter makes good sense, if we assume that IQ is largely

    I don’t think White separatism is a practical enterprise, and
    many White people find it abhorrent (I don’t) so I don’t expect that your ideas will gain much traction.

    As far as the nostalgia thing, I feel lots of nostalgia too,
    and there are lots of things I’d like to roll back, but I
    get the point that that’s a crummy sales pitch.


See John D’s response at that thread.   Part of it is quoted here:

John D

Great posts on this thread. I completely agree with Old Atlantic’s take.

You can lament as useless the heralding of an earlier time as a golden age, but it does serve a purpose. It can’t be the ONLY argument that you make to advocate for white interests, but it must be part of the argument, because you can show (prove) that it was indeed a far better time for white people, and the country as a whole back in the 50’s, very early 60’s. By every metric, it is true, for white people. And make no mistake, it was a white country then. Unabashedly, unashamedly. We were a proud country, preeminent in many respects. So you need that
“golden age” time as a reference to which you can compare this nightmarish multicult that we live in now.

You use that period to point out all the good things about it. Diversity fetishists point to it as a time of evil, and as cause to vilify whites. But the truth is on our side, as it was, in fact, superior in nearly every respect.

== I added the following two:


You raise some good issues which I can respond to. Link at my name has more detail, in fact many articles discussing these types of issues.

Suppose US population is stable at 300 million. If people live 75 years, 4 million die per year. If 2 million enter, and pop is stable, then there are 2 million births. 2 million births over 4 million deaths is a genetic survival ratio of 1/2. 25 years birth to parent, so in 75 years, 3 cycles leaves 1/8 genes. Even if pop goes to 450mm and 1 million enter, we get a fraction of 5/6 per cycle, which results in genetic extinction.

Also I have developed alternative assumption sets to prove the extinction which I call the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

Moreover, the genetic extinction is rolling. All genes that come here go extinct. Its not necessary that the inflow of genes be the same to prove the extinction. You can think of each gene as getting a serial number that includes the date of its arrival. When two genes form another gene, it gets both serial numbers and the date of formation. The inflow causes all the genes with dates prior to today’s date to go extinct over time. The same happens to all the genes that flow in each year. I call this the genetic graveyard effect.

The depression of fertility in the West shows that the effect is substantial. You can look at the Elderweb graph linked to above. Fertility has fallen except during immigration restriction. We are already seeing the impact.

John D’s comments are good. I don’t agree with immigration by high IQ since they are racist and hostile to us as shown by their behavior. They are already crowding out our own high IQ people from universities, tech jobs, everything but law. But law is overcrowded because whites go there as the last hope. Its getting worse.

High IQ immigration leads to cut off the genetic head and the rest is dead. That is what is happening to whites by high IQ immigration. The universities are now hostile to whites because of the huge non-white presence. This wouldn’t be possible if the universities were almost completely white as they once were.

I go into more detail on this at my blog.

The incoming groups are basically hostile to whites and ethnocentric. Moreover, the immigration of whites from Europe in 19th century is not a good example. Whites in Europe have less genetic variation than on any continent.


“Europe’s genetic variation is about a third of that of other continents.[2][3]”

“In 2008, two international research teams published analyses of large-scale genotyping of large samples of Europeans, revealing relatively little genetic differentiation between the various European populations sampled.”

Thus white immigration in the 19th century is not a good example for non-white immigration today to any white lands. The violence, loan defaults, and hostility to the civilization, culture and people of every white land when they arrive shows this over and over. They are substantially different and alien on a genetic basis and they are hostile because of this.

They ethnically cleanse whites from the downtowns of every city in a country as soon as they are able. This then destroys the European culture of cities. Hard to do cafe physics or philosophy or genetics if you are ethnically cleansed from the cities.


There are many good comments at threads at Guy White and Vanishing American.  We are not finished yet.   Whites are all noticing what is happening.

== From VA thread part of one comment:I, too, look to the past. Although my kids are aware of my cultural/racial views, I realize they have no comprehension of how different things were in this country. They have never known anything other than being in a minority (except at church). I had to run to Walmart to pick up some things for my son leaving for basic training, and perhaps one in ten shoppers appeared to be a white American – and this is in north Texas! I get depressed just leaving my house, because the Hispanics, the shuffling Asians, the saris and the hijabs are omnipresent (even at the gym).


“John D’s comments are good. I don’t agree with immigration by high IQ since they are racist and hostile to us as shown by their behavior. ”

Who? Which specific group of high IQ immigrants? Chinese? Indians? Germans? Russian Jews?

My own experience is that Indians assimilate fairly rapidly,
as have the Japanese. Koreans and Chinese less rapidly,
but I still see it happening. Intermarriage rates are a
good measure of assimilation. And East Asians typically
assimilate to White norms, not Black ones.

That said, I don’t think we should have large amounts of
immigration from anywhere. This country is full. But I don’t
see the problem with small numbers of high IQ immigrants,
as Guy said, 10 or 20 thousand a year max. It’s much more
important to rid ourselves of the tens of millions of
illegal immigrants. I’d think that even from a purely
mathematical “island diversity” standpoint, you’d agree.
Illegal alien amnesty is by far the biggest threat.

“They are already crowding out our own high IQ people from universities, tech jobs, everything but law.”

I went to a first tier tech school, and while there were
plenty of Chinese, we held our own. Many of the Chinese
ethnics were American, and had already assimilated.
I still work in tech, and I know of what you speak, but
I still don’t feel it’s as bad as all that.

I don’t want to be ethnically cleansed by any group, but
if my descendants have some fraction of Han Chinese
ancestry I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing.

a.n. animus,

“Cheng was born in Wujiang, Jiangsu Province (currently Shanghai) in 1918. He graduated from the Department of Physics, Zhejiang University in 1941. 1946, he went to Britain and studied in the University of Edinburgh, and obtained PhD in 1948 (advisor: Max Born). Then he became a researcher in UK.

Cheng returned China in 1950. ”

After Fuchs was arrested who was also a Max Born assistant.  Max Born had 1 assistant arrested in 1950, 4 then went to communist countries, 3 to China, and one lost his security clearance 4 years later.  More from Wiki on Cheng:

“Cheng returned China in 1950. He was an associate professor at Zhejiang University, then he went to Nanjing, became an associate professor in Nanjing University. Afterward he was promoted to full professorship in Nanjing University.

Cheng was a pioneer of Chinese nuclear technology and played an important role in the development of the first Chinese atomic bomb. He first calculated out the inner temperature and pressure for an antomic bomb blast in China. His calculation was an extremely heavy task and nearly manual, because during that time China didn’t have any computer or less calculator. He also solved the mechanism of the inner explosion, which could support the design of the bomb. He was the chief director for many nuclear weapon test fields/bases and their explosion processes. [2]

Cheng was elected to be an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. He was also a Standing Member of the Science and Technology Committee, Chinese National Nuclear Industry Corporation. He was former Vice-President of the Nuclear Weapons Research Institute, and the Deputy Chief Director of the Nuclear Weapons Research Institute, People’s Republic of China. [3]”

“In 1938, Peng was enrolled in foreign study program and went to study at University of Edinburgh in Britain, and worked with prominent physicist Max Born. ”

“He was involved in and led the development of China’s atomic bomb and hydrogen bomb.”

“In 1948, he received a PhD degree from the H. H. Will Physics Lab of Bristol University in the United Kingdom and continued his postdoctoral studies at Liverpool University where he coauthored the book of Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices with Max Born between 1949 and 1951.

In 1951, Huang returned to China to teach, and became a professor of physics at Peking University. In 1955, he became one of the first batch of academicans of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).”

Fuchs was arrested in 1950.

“Klaus Emil Julius Fuchs (29 December 1911 – 28 January 1988), was a German-born British theoretical physicist and atomic spy who in 1950 was convicted of supplying information from the British and American atomic bomb research to the USSR during and shortly after World War II. Fuchs was an extremely competent scientist. While at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Fuchs was responsible for many significant theoretical calculations relating to the first fission weapons and later, the early models of the hydrogen bomb, the first fusion weapon.”

“He earned his PhD in Physics from the University of Bristol in 1937, studying under Nevill Mott, and took a DSc at the University of Edinburgh while studying under Max Born. ”

“From August 1944 Fuchs worked in the Theoretical Physics Division at Los Alamos, New Mexico under Hans Bethe. His chief area of expertise was the problem of imploding the fissionable core of the plutonium bomb. At one point, Fuchs did calculation work that Edward Teller had refused to do due to lack of interest. He was the author of techniques (such as the still-used Fuchs-Nordheim method) for calculating the energy of a fissile assembly which goes highly prompt critical. Later, he also filed a patent with John von Neumann, describing a method to initiate fusion in a thermonuclear weapon with an implosion trigger. Fuchs was one of the many Los Alamos scientists present at the Trinity test.

From late 1947 to May 1949, Fuchs gave Alexandre Feklisov, his case officer, the principal theoretical outline for creating a hydrogen bomb and the initial drafts for its development as the work progressed in England and America. Meeting with Feklisov six times, he provided the results of the test at Eniwetok atoll of uranium and plutonium bombs and the key data on U.S. production of uranium-235. By revealing that America was producing just one hundred kilograms of uranium-235 and twenty kilograms of plutonium per month, Fuchs made it easy for Soviet scientists to calculate the number of atomic bombs the United States possessed.”

Fuchs work on theoretical calculations and Cheng’s overlap.  So did Fuchs work with Cheng to teach him the calculations in England during the late 1940’s?    Cheng return to China in 1950, i.e. after Fuchs was arrested in January 1950.

“Fuchs confessed he was a spy in January, 1950. Fuchs told interrogators the KGB acquired an agent in Berkeley, California who informed the Soviet Union about electromagnetic separation research of uranium-235 in 1942 or earlier. He was prosecuted by Sir Hartley Shawcross and was convicted on 1 March 1950.”

“In 1950 he left Canada and returned to communist Poland. ”

“Doctoral advisor     Max Born”

“One important “pupil” who paid Fuchs an early visit was Qian Sanqiang. In 1959 Qian was the designated mastermind of Mao’s A-bomb program. In July of that year, Qian made his way to East Germany, where he met with Fuchs at length. (H. Terry Hawkins, now a senior fellow at Los Alamos, told Stillman in 2006, “I read this report in an unclassified publication, that this meeting took place shortly after Fuchs returned to East Germany. Fuchs gave Qian information that greatly assisted the Chinese program.” Also see During those long summer days of 1959, Fuchs gave Qian a full tutorial on the design and operation of Fat Man. In all likelihood, he also added his thoughts on the role of radiation pressure in thermonuclear weapons.

Fuchs likely taught all of those who went to Communist countries atomic bomb calculations between 1945 and his arrest in 1950.  He indicated he would not reveal all to the British.

Max Born left Scotland as well after Fuchs arrest and went back to Germany.  Einstein couldn’t believe it.  But it got him close to the East German border, which was effectively an open border at the time.  Born got the Nobel Prize in Physics in fall 1954.  Oppenheimer security clearance was in spring 1954.

Of the above list none of them were born in the US, Canada or England.

The nukes made in Pakistan are from China in effect.  So the calculations used to make the nukes that will possibly destroy our cities were taught by Fuchs, an immigrant scientist, to the other immigrant scientists.

Max Born was an immigrant scientist.  One assistant was arrested for spying.  4 went to communist countries.  2 are credited by China with major contributions to their bomb program.  We know for sure Fuchs helped another.

“Qian went for France in 1937. He studied in Collège de Sorbonne and Collège de France, doing research under Frédéric Joliot-Curie and Irène Joliot-Curie. He returned to China in 1948.”

Remarks of Joel Brenner head of counter intelligence for the US about Russia and China’s spying in the US.

And there is more on the above topic but you can find more on the Internet or at my webpage under Russia Plagiarism Files.  Also some interesting discussion on Steven Chu.

A comment posted at my blog:

“You are disgusting. I’m a Chinese American with a full Top Secret national security clearance, as are many others in the CIA, State, DOD, Treasury, etc. And I wasn’t even born here. Dr. Chu was born and raised only in America.

You disgust me. The fact is, WE are the ones who TRULY love America, because we love the USA in spite of lifetime of racists like you (judging and grouping an entire race of people to behavioral problems/treason, yeah, that’s the definition of racism). ”

Notice an Asian face on its first webpage at this time.  Why would someone from China work at a weapons lab making nukes to be used on China?  Either they are a sociopath, a spy or pretty desperate for a job?  Why would a Chinese born here want to make nukes to be used on China?

HardLogic thanks and I like your ideas as well.

“#  In 1982 China’s premier Deng Xiaoping began the transfer of nuclear weapons technology to Pakistan and, in time, to other third world countries. Those transfers included blueprints for the ultrasimple CHIC-4 design using highly enriched uranium, first tested by China in 1966.
#  A Pakistani derivative of CHIC-4 apparently was tested in China on 26 May 1990.
#  After four failed experiments, Chinese researchers fired a successful enhanced radiation weapon, a neutron bomb, on 19 December 1984.”

China is intentionally spreading atomic know-how to Muslim countries so it will be used on the West including Israel.  The authors of this discuss more in their book.

When Americans die from a nuclear bomb it will be in part due to China.  The Chinese who got nuclear know-how in the West gave it to Russia as well as China in the 1940’s and 1950’s.  It was a joint spy operation.  Fuchs was under control of the Soviets in England and the US and East Germany and he gave secrets to Chinese at least in East Germany that we know of.  He probably also did detailed calculations with Huanwu Peng, Kaijia Cheng and possibly Kun Huang and maybe even Qian Sanqiang in England.

The students lined up at his desk practically to ask questions.  He must have been very busy with a full time job as well. (Almost as bad as writing a blog.) It was probably a study group that he met with regularly and whose attendance varied.    It would be interesting to know who else was in it.   Also who else had study groups.  Who else taught this one.

American cities being nuked is hostile action.  English too.    Its not cricket.

%d bloggers like this: