Adil Khan ‘nowhere to hide’ genocide British stock

July 12, 2009

“Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police”

“”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

(Note his address to “you”.  Whom is he talking to?  British people?  White people, British and American?  More on this later.)

Khan if we could only hear you now:–I-Spit-My-Last-Breath-at-TheeWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Ricardo-Montalban-is-the-Man-

Patrick Cleburne updates us on the sentences of the two bloggers prosecuted for hate speech in the UK.  Their sentences were long and harsh.

Also see Nicholas Stix

“Simon Sheppard, 51, of Selby in North Yorkshire, received four years and 10 months, and Stephen Whittle, 42, of Preston, two years and four months.”

Kirk: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”  For the heretical two now sentenced to long terms in prison this quote fits.   To fight for your freedom and the survival of your race is the greatest thing we can do.  Now these two are in prison for having fought for our freedom.  The quote is from Tale of Two Cities and refers to the French Revolution.  We are in such a time of revolution now.  We are fighting for our freedom and our survival yet again.

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.
Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
English novelist (1812 – 1870)–It-Was-the-Best-of-TimesWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-

“That, said Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police, makes their conviction a first.”

“I’ve done far worse than kill you. I’ve hurt you. And, I wish to go on hurting you. I shall leave you as you left me–as you left her–marooned, for all eternity, in the center of a dead planet: buried alive.”

Adil Khan has done something far worse than kill the two bloggers, if he could have, he has killed British Justice.  That was something uncommon although it was called the Common Law.  But British Justice is something Adil Khan and his country didn’t invent and don’t have.

They only had it when the British ruled there and only where the British ruled and when the British ruled.  Since then its back to Islamic Law, which is what the two bloggers were practically imprisoned under.  They were imprisoned under the law of Adil Khan.  Khan is the law and they are his prisoners.

Take away the British, the real ethnic British, and leave Khan’s lot in charge and you lose British Justice straight away.  Faster than you can say Sheppard and Whittle.

Adil Khan is put over British, ethnic British, as part of their ethnic cleansing.

Judge Rodney Grant “which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.”

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

Adil Khan is one of the colonizing oppressor’s own nationals.  He is not British ethnicity.  He is genociding the British by Wright Island Model immigration.  This an intentional policy.  Khan’s job is to do what the definition of genocide above says.

“Adil Khan, head of diversity”

“destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group;”

Khan is engaged in genocide under the definition.  He is paid to do this.  The oppressed group are 011 British, i.e. ethnic British stock.

The two bloggers were exercising a fundamental right, the right to use humor against those engaged in genocide of them.

Kirk: “Khan — I’m laughing at the superior intellect.”–Laughing-at-the-Superior-IntellectWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Nerds-

That isn’t hate speech by Kirk, that’s the right to fight back.  The right to make jokes at those ethnically cleansing us is the right to keep our culture as we fight back.  Its the right to organize unity in our group to repel the invaders.  That is why they make it illegal.  They know that already.

Adil Khan.  Evil Khan.  Evil Adil Khan.  Adil Evil Khan.  Now look what has happened.  Khan would call it hate speech.  He would target it, yes he can.  In Britain he can.

If the hate speech bill passes in the Senate then yes he can and Eric Holder and Obama can in the U.S.  Because Khan doesn’t allow such hate speech, not for British or Americans.  White ones that is.  He allows himself all the hate speech he likes.

Eric Holder spelled that out specifically in his testimony to Congress.   Target whites, preferably British ethnic stock or something close to it.   Some of the links point to his testimony.  Holder said that Holder can call America a nation of cowards or whites a nation of cowards all he wants.  Yes he can.  But white Americans can’t say anything about blacks, no they can’t.  That is the Holder Rule.  He spelled it out to Congress.

Holder did that because he was sure the bill would pass and he wanted a legislative record for Sonia Sotomayor and other Hussein appointments to point to in their decisions so as to apply the law only to whites, because Holder said in his testimony to Congress it is only to whites.  Think University of Chicago Constitutional Law Lecturer Barack Hussein Obama pointed out to Holder that he should put that into the legislative record so that judges could point to Holder’s testimony, that the law targets whites only?

The Wright Island Model should have been used as a defense to this law and to charge Adil Khan.  That should be done in the US if this is tried here.  Blair, Brown, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Bush Sr, Kennedy, McCain, etc are guilty of genocide under the law already.   Clinton’s frequent statements of his intent to make whites a minority and his taking money from Saudi Arabia and UAE which continued immigration to the US after 9/11 shows that.

This is part of a petition to Congress to stop Wright Island Model immigration to the US and stop so called hate crime laws which are themselves genocide under the above definitino and mathematical theorem.

“It is important to remember this is a separate bill from S.909, the “Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act”. Some commentaries confuse the two. HR 1966 has so far made little progress, whereas S.909 has cleared the House and is very close to getting through the Senate.”

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.  Also, have you watched the shocking video that shows Attorney General Holder saying there is no equal protection under the hate bill?  It’s on the home page at””

Call Senate Judiciary to stop hate crime Bills Monday July 13 2009.  One day before July 14 the anniversary of liberating the Bastille, which had only two prisoners.  They were

“Simon Sheppard, 51, of Selby in North Yorkshire, received four years and 10 months, and Stephen Whittle, 42, of Preston, two years and four months.”

Members of the
Senate Committee on the Judiciary



  • Patrick J. Leahy (Ver.), Chairman
  • Herb Kohl (Wis.)
  • Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)
  • Russell D. Feingold (Wis.)
  • Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.)
  • Richard J. Durbin (Illin.)
  • Benjamin L. Cardin (Maryl.)
  • Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Is.)
  • Ron Wyden (Ore.)
  • Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)
  • Edward E. Kaufman (Dela.)
  • Arlen Specter (Penn.)
  • Orrin G. Hatch (Utah)
  • Charles E. Grassley (Iowa)
  • Jon Kyl (Ariz.)
  • Jeff Sessions (Alab.)
  • Lindsey Graham (S.C.)
  • John Cornyn (Texas)
  • Tom Coburn (Okla.)

Call now to liberate Americans from hate crime bills in honor of Bastille Day.  Call your Senator but especially if on Senate Judiciary.

For now, the following page is full of videos and information on this bill.

Note 011 British is a US Census Code and thus directed into the forum of the United States.  011 British should not be ethnically cleansed from America the way Adil Khan is doing it in the UK.  Sonia Sotomayor and Adil Khan are the same, ethnic cleansers of 011 British world wide.  They are generals of genocide of 011 British.  Call your senator to oppose Sonia Sotomayor for confirmation to the US Supreme Court as well.  Its like putting Adil Khan on the US Supreme Court.  We might as well give them the keys to US and UK subs with nukes next.  In fact, a Muslim born in Iran is head of FBI WMD, Vahid Majidi.

Think it matters?  Saudis and UAE were gotten out of US after 9/11.  Pakistan ISI General Ahmed was in US in week before 9/11 to demand US lift sanctions on Pakistan’s nuclear program, or it would be unjust.  That is what was written in US papers and Pakistan papers.  Then they did 9/11.  Think this doesn’t matter?  This matters.  Think of the time its cost you since 9/11 at airports.   Think of the several days delay when only Saudi nationals were allowed to fly in the US making their escape out.  It matters.  Adil Khan is here to genocide us physically not just mentally.  He works together with bin Laden. When you ride with Adil Khan bin Laden rides with the three of you.  Pakistan, UAE and Saudi links to 9/11 are documented here.

Senator Schumer has taken down his press releases on Saudi links to 9/11. Schumer saudi arabia 9/11

This may be a transition to a new website, but I didn’t find these ones spot on Saudi Arabia and 9/11 at the new one.


    Mar 19, 2003 SCHUMER: US MUST SHOW 9/11 FAMILIES THE BLUEPRINTS OF SAUDI SUPPORT FOR AL QAEDA. New US documents identify Saudi Arabian families as among…/PR01566.html – Similar


    A key figure in the 9/11 report that was released yesterday is reportedly living in Saudi Arabia and should be brought back to the United States for further…/PR01893.html – Similar


    Sep 10, 2003 Experts agree that Saudi Arabia is the epicenter of Wahhabist belief and that Zionists were responsible for 9-11 and claimed that Saudis…/PR02009.html – Similar

If Schumer is afraid, if its not just a website move, then what about you?  Adil Khan rides with the Saudis, UAE and Pakistan ISI to come after you.  This is your chance to seize the day and stand up for Liberty.  Be a Son or Daughter of Liberty.  Now is the time to be a Summer Patriot Caller to save our freedom of speech that once again has been stolen by the British government, this time by Adil Khan, the new overseer of 011 British.  Want one of those here.  Sonia Sotomayor is one.

This is the Summer of Freedom Fighting in America.  Call Senate Judiciary especially if in your state.  Let your voice be heard.  Phone calls count the most.  One phone call in a year is better than 12 faxes.  So make your call this week.  Think of those who sacrifice limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They sacrifice for what?  For your right to call your Senator in the Summer of Freedom from hate laws and hate judges like Sonia Sotomayor and hate overseers like Adil Khan.

“Khan: “Kirk, you’re still alive, my old friend.”  Kirk: “Still! Old! Friend!””–Still-Old-FriendWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-

“Who will raise their voice?”

If you are 011 British or are with them, don’t let your kind be subjected to hate speech laws, which means advocating your survival is hate speech.  This is the time.  Every phone call counts.

== Pakistan nuclear sanctions “unjust”

Hypothesis: Pakistan. Timeline: Week before 9/11/2001, the head of Pakistan’s ISI came to the US and met with US leaders to try to get sanctions lifted. That failed. He gave the go-ahead for 9/11 to al Qaeda in the DC area.

Then he met with US intensively following few days. US agreed to life sanctions and pay money to Pakistan. He then gave the signal to the anthrax team to mail the anthrax on 9/18. Reason? 9/11 was to turn on US concern for al Qaeda and that they needed Pakistan’s help to get to Afghanistan.

Once they got the money they sent out anthrax made from spores from a US lab to turn US attention to domestic terrorism. Once they got the money they wanted to turn attention away from Pakistan. It basically worked.

Before 9/11, there was talk the US might lift sanctions on India but not Pakistan. Pakistan already considered the sanctions unjust. The head of ISI was a fundamentalist and unjust in that context means its not just ok to kill but whatever it takes is required to do to remove the unjust situation.

Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001

NEW YORK: The Bush administration is preparing to lift punitive sanctions imposed on India for its nuclear program. But clearing this hurdle to bolster political, economic and military ties with India while maintaining even sterner sanctions on Pakistan would be seen throughout the Middle East as discrimination of the first order. Islamabad would be pushed in dangerous directions, particularly toward increased reliance on its nuclear and missile programs.

Further crippling a weak Pakistan, perhaps to the point of state failure, would invite its myriad problems to spill over into other countries. Islamic militancy, arms and drug trafficking and religiously motivated sectarian violence could have devastating consequences for India’s economic prospects and cause trouble in important Islamic oil-producing countries. Risks to U.S. forces and interests in the Middle East would be a virtual certainty.


Search Pakistan “sanctions lifted” 2001, and other similar searches. Toss in nuclear, IMF, etc. Pakistan’s central banker on 9/11 later wrote a book and said Pakistan was unable to continue w/o lifting sanctions. That meant Pakistan would have to give up its nuclear program but India wouldn’t. That would be “unjust”.

has info on Pakistan and 9/11. Can look up meetings ISI and US after 9/11 before 9/18. Also has an anthrax timeline.

By Sep 23 2001 Sanctions lifted in the news.

Pakistan knew that before 9/18/01. There were also anthrax incidents in Pakistan in 2001 after 9/11. Pakistan ISI was capable of getting anthrax from a US source and then producing it. Only Pakistan and the others involved in 9/11 could plan it all out in advance and be ready to mail on 9/18 from NJ and from Florida the fake letters to same people, e.g. NBC.

Only Pakistan had a motive to divert attention from 9/11 on 9/18 because then they had the money and sanctions lifted deal. Means, motive, opportunity, timing. It all fits Pakistan.

Pakistan also has the MO before 9/11 and up to now. In 1999, Musharraf invaded Kargil and said Pakistani troops were terrorists. India won and wanted to return the bodies of Pakistan soldiers, but Pakistan still said they were terrorists and wouldn’t take the bodies of their own soldiers.


The Heretical 2 case:

Judge Rodney Grant told the men their material was “abusive and insulting” and had the potential to cause “grave social harm”.

He added: “Such offences as these have, by their very nature, the potential to cause grave social harm, particularly in a society such as ours which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.

‘Groundbreaking case’

“These are serious offences. I can say without any hesitation that I have rarely seen, or had to read or consider, material which is so abusive and insulting… towards racial groups within our own society.”

“Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001”

Almost the same language from Adil Khan and his pet judge and Pakistan on Sep 7 2001 to the US with former CIA James Woolsey on the side of Pakistan ISI delivering in effect was an ultimatum on the United States.  Atta was in the DC area the week before 9/11. He came up from Florida on his way to New Jersey.  When the US didn’t agree to life sanctions, did ISI General Mahmood Ahmed (also spelled alternative ways) then give Mohamed Atta the order?

Pakistan nuclear sanctions unjust

How long until the above speech is labeled hate speech against our ally Pakistan and its ISI?  How long until the website Complete 9/11 Timeline is hate speech?  How long until the BBC takes down its webpages that have links to 9/11 and Pakistan ISI?  Senator Schumer has already removed if it isn’t just a move his webpages linking Saudi Arabia to 9/11.  After 9/11, only Saudis and UAE could fly and that was to leave the US.

The Saudi Ambassador’s wife had given funds to the handlers who met the hijackers in California before 9/11.  How long until that becomes hate speech against Saudis and Islam? How long until stopping Muslims is a hate crime?  Atta was thought a hijacker by an American official but he didn’t stop him because that would be racist.  How will it be after Eric Holder and Barack Hussein Obama get their hate laws going?  How long until using Hussein’s middle name will be hate speech?  If you want your freedom and your life call Senate Judiciary this week or call your Senator if not on Senate Judiciary.

Do you want Adil Khan giving diversity training to our security people at airports?  You want Adil Khan praising them for searching Al Gore and for not stopping Atta?  You want Khan to say the agent who thought he was racist to want to stop Atta was right, he was racist and now is in prison?  Think it can’t happen here?  9/11 did happen here.  Call those Senators.  They practically work for Saudi Arabia as it is already.  Let them know they work for you.  Let them know you want your freedom and your life.

And you don’t want to wait at airports when the real hijackers go in without being stopped.  Think that’s racist? Adil Khan does.  Atta was one of the hijackers.  He wasn’t stopped because the agent thought it was racist to stop him.  Think Adil Khan will change that when he is in charge?  Think Vahid Majidi has changed that?  He already is in charge of FBI WMD.  Call your Senator.

==Quote Vdare inside this section

David Hench of the Portland Press Herald interviewed U.S. Air ticket agent Michael Tuohey in 2005 and recounted that fateful encounter.

“Then [Tuohey’s] eyes locked on Atta.

“’It just sent chills through you. You see his picture in the paper (now). You see more life in that picture than there is in flesh and blood,’ Tuohey said.

“Then Tuohey went through an internal debate that still haunts him.

“‘I said to myself, “If this guy doesn’t look like an Arab terrorist, then nothing does.” Then I gave myself a mental slap, because in this day and age, it’s not nice to say things like this,’ he said.”   [More]

==End quote Vdare

Who is laughing at this? Adil Khan is laughing.  He is laughing all the way to the next terrorist attack.

Khan: “Time is a luxury you don’t have.”–Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan-Ricardo-Montalban-Khan-Noonien-Singh-Time-Is-A-Luxury-You-Do-Not-Have

Call your Senator.

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.  Also, have you watched the shocking video that shows Attorney General Holder saying there is no equal protection under the hate bill?  It’s on the home page at””

The right to stop the terrorists is the same as the right to laugh at jokes about them.  They are one and the same.  Adil Khan knows that.  He is following the playbook of the Left to colonize the West.   Adil Khan’s colonization isn’t nice.  Its the same as bin Laden’s.  Adil Khan is a more effective bin Laden.


Khan “”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

Wonder who he means by “you”?  Sort of odd expression for a policeman isn’t it?  Aren’t they supposed to wait for a crime and investigate it?  When do they issue general threats for speech they don’t like?  Who does he mean by you?  Would that be British citizens including non-whites?  Or would that be British as in:

“Mumbai Terrorists Told to “Kill Whites, Especially British and Americans””

Did Adil Khan have these same chaps in mind when he said “you”?

==Just to repeat

“”From hell’s heart, I stab at thee. For hates’ sake, I spit my last breath at thee.””

“thee” and “you” and “kill whites preferably British and American.”  All the same?  What type of American is that?  US Census Code 011 British perhaps?  Or other census codes will do in a pinch?  Like German perhaps?  Or French? Just possibly?  Like Barack Hussein Obama not having dinner with the President of France when he visited France after Hussein’s Cairo speech to the Ummah?

The Ummah that includes Adil Khan and whoever issued instructions to “target whites preferably British and American.”  There seems some confusion in the reporting whether it was kill or target whites and whether it was preferably or especially.  But no confusion about who they meant by British and American.

They didn’t mean Adil Khan that is for sure.  Adil Khan understood whom they meant.  He meant them too.   They both think as one on who whom.   They are on the same page on that.  Funny how that is isn’t it?  Almost like they shared something in common.  Funny, Adil Khan probably insists he is British to the whites on the force.  But then again, when he says “you”, he means something a little more specific.

Adil Khan: target whites, preferably British and American.  Works for him.

In the world of Adil Khan, Eric Holder and Barrack Hussein Obama, “target whites, preferably British and American” is not a hate crime.  “It is a consummation devoutly to be wished.”  Sonia Sotomayor joins in that too.  She also knows who whom.  In Obama’s case, he makes it clear.  He gave fellow Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain the finger in public and called Sarah Palin a pig, all in public on videotape.

Just because Obama makes a face doesn’t mean he didn’t know it.

You can drag it to second 48 and see him put his hand over his forehead when he implies Sarah Palin is a pig.  That’s with him saying the words.
Obama giving McCain the finger

Obama giving Hillary the finger

We know who he was targeting then.

Let’s hear Khan say it, say it for all of them:–I-Spit-My-Last-Breath-at-TheeWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Ricardo-Montalban-is-the-Man-


Adil Khan works to make permanent what bin Laden made temporary, terror in our hearts so that we lose the will to fight back.  Of the two, Adil Khan is the more deadly by far.  When Adil Khan wins, all our people will die.  Slowly to be sure, but the end is certain.  All 011 British die under Khan.  All whites in the West die under Khan.  Slowly.  With much unpleasantness, but the end is certain.  Unless you call your Senator to stop the hate crimes bill and stop the Adil Khans in their track.


More commentary on the case here:


“”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

So who is Adil Khan addressing when he says “you’ve”?  White British?  Wouldn’t that make it a hate crime for a policeman to target white ethnic British that way?  Doesn’t sound very fair.  Could Adil Khan be charged for this remark?  Can it be used in an appeal to show bias on Khan’s part?  Bias in Adil Khan?  I’m shocked.

What about Eric Holder’s testimony and Obama’s not rescinding it?  That the law targets whites?  Isn’t that conspiracy to deny whites their civil rights?  You don’t get to violate the law just because you are Attorney General and President do you?  Holder’s testimony and Obama’s not contradicting it especially after the Nation of Cowards speech show an intent to apply the laws unevenly against whites.  That is conspiracy to deny whites their civil rights.  That can be charged by state and local prosecutors not just federal prosecutors.  They can convene a grand jury and have Obama and Holder indicted.


Kirk: “I don’t believe in the no-win scenario.”–Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan-William-Shatner-Admiral-James-T-Kirk-I-Do-Not-Believe-in-the-No-Win-Scenario

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.”

Stop the no-win scenario that Adil Khan thinks he has set for us.

This is draft and preliminary.  Comments and corrections welcome.  All other disclaimers apply.


One Response to “Adil Khan ‘nowhere to hide’ genocide British stock”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: