To Greenspan: stop immigration is the answer

October 4, 2009

Greenspan: But remember that unless there is a monthly increase of more than 100,000 a month, you’ve still got the unemployment rate continuing to rise.

Greenspan sees unemployment going up.  But he still advocates continued legal immigration.  That’s why the unemployment rate rises if 50,000 jobs are created a month, plus fertility of Hispanics already here.


Skilled Workers

Greenspan also endorsed an expansion of the H-1B visa program for skilled workers that is backed by technology companies such as Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp.

The 2007 legislation would have increased the size of the program to 115,000 annual visas, up from 65,000.

Greenspan said U.S. schools don’t produce enough skilled workers and the gap must be filled with immigrants who have advanced degrees.

“If we are to continue to engage the world and enhance our standards of living, we will have to either markedly improve our elementary and secondary education or lower our barriers to skilled immigrants,” Greenspan said.


White minority at HarvardWhite minority at Harvard

(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.


Greenspan says Harvard is more Jewish so keep immigration going to finish off the Founding Stock Americans.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

That is what Greenspan is pushing.  We have the right to separate from Greenspan because Greenspan advocates our genocide.  The We is non-Jewish whites.

Greenspan is an ethno-advocate for Jewish interests.  He advocates genocide of non Jewish whites by immigration so that Jews will have or keep their relative power in financial services, universities, etc.  Greenspan is advocatinge genocide of non Jewish whites to benefit elite Jews like himself.

That means that non Jewish whites have the right to advocate separation from Greenspan.  We have the right to be in a different country from a person and group advocating and causing our genocide.   That means we have the right to separate from the slicer coalition or affirmative action coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews.  Even in this crisis, Greenspan advocates continued legal immigration of skilled and unskilled alike.  The consequence as the theorem states is genocide.

Therefore we have the right to separate from Greenspan and the rest of the slicer coalition, i.e. the rest of the circle excluding us at Harvard, a university we founded and created from nothing and maintained and grew for centuries.  Now it has been taken over and turned against us as part of generalized genocide.

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

Greenspan is an advocate of the destruction of the essential life of non Jewish whites by H-1b, unskilled illegal Hispanics, and so on.  His group is taking over Harvard and has largely done so.  Harvard was colonized and non Jewish whites who founded it removed.  This is part of generalized genocide as defined by Lemkin above.

=Note added 6:48 pm

Greenspan was fed chairman and is an economist.  He can’t claim not to understand compound interest.  Nor can he claim to not understand the inverse.  Inflation is a way to model the inverse of accumulation.  Greenspan can’t claim not to understand inflation.  The math of the growth or decay of a population or subgroup is the same.  We see the impact on the pie chart above of proportions at Harvard.  We see the same everywhere.  Greenspan knows he is advocating the math of genocide for whites.  Its intentional.


7 Responses to “To Greenspan: stop immigration is the answer”

  1. Patrick Cleburne Says:

    Amazing how Moratorium is kept out of public debate.



  2. oldatlantic Says:

    I agree. We need to try to put it there. We need Moratorium Tea Parties. Thanks for the link from Vdare. You are doing great work.


  3. Moratorium for whom?

    Our country, an extention of Europe, was meant for the benefit of European progeny not for the progeny of some other country.

    It is high time we arrest and reverse current illegal and legal Third World immigration to this country before it’s too late.

  4. The Admiral Says:

    It is too late already, if you want to arrest and reverse the immigration invasion in a peaceful manner. First of all, for immigration to be arrested and reversed, we have to assume that patriotic Whites will take back the government, the security forces, and the military, which in itself implies some sort of violent break with the current regime. After that, going forward, any serious attempt to control immigration will be met by rioting and organized violence, possibly an insurrection, on the part of alien non-White population groups. Are White Americans prepared for this eventuality? More importantly, are White Americans MORALLY prepared to execute the actions required to liberate the country?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: