re Guy White Black-Jewish Relations post-1968

December 27, 2009

http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/black-jewish-relations-post-1968/

“Dell” argued in his comments that Jews are responsible for affirmative action. In fact, affirmative action has been the reason for the Jewish-Black split. Without a doubt, black power was promoted by Jews prior to the late 1960s. Similarly without a doubt, the Jewish-Black relations (which exception of some radical liberals who never see blacks) has been extremely hostile.

Approximately 80 percent of Jewish people voted for Obama.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1034574.html

http://jta.org/news/article/2008/11/05/1000800/op-ed-why-jews-voted-for-obama

Obama is affirmative action personified.  His administration is pushing it.  Nation of Cowards Eric Holder personified it as Deputy Attorney General under Clinton and now as Attorney General.  Staffing choices such as US Attorney for Manhattan show that.

http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys/index.html

Preet Bharara

United States Attorney – Southern District of New York

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/obama-cabinet-shy-southerners-whats-yall

Jews helped fund the defeat of Southern White Virgil Goode because he said stop Muslim immigration.

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=Actblue+Virgil+Goode&btnG=Google+Search

http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/4357/jewish-pac-money-flowing-to-democrats-once-again/

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=Jewish+support+Democrats+money&btnG=Google+Search

By almost 80 percent of Jews voting for Obama and giving to Democrats a lot of money, this proves Jews support affirmative action in fact.  Obama is the affirmative action president.  He is pushing affirmative action through the system, government and private.  He is staffing the institutions with these people and they are pushing it.  Obama and his wife are all the affirmative action elite.   Jews voted for it, paid for it, and staffed and managed his campaign and his White House and key positions.

This supports the Slicer Coalition hypothesis that Jews run the slicer coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Muslims and Jews.  They slice out non-Jewish whites from major universities and every elite higher from those universities.

Non-Jewish whites are approximately 20 percent at Harvard, Stanford, UCLA and Berkeley undergrad programs.  This slices them out of the fast track jobs at elite institutions, public and private.  The ones hiring are the non-whites going through those institutions.  They get the power slots in government, academia and industry.  They hire South Asians and East Asians, Jews, Muslims, etc.  They don’t hire non-Jewish whites.  They are being dispossessed by the Slicer Coalition. That Coalition is led by Jews and funded by Jews.

===Following from

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/generalized-genocide/raphael-lemkin/

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

White minority at HarvardWhite minority at Harvard

(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

==

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5.  The 20 percent Jewish at Stanford is not in the following list but is a reasonable estimate.  The result is the same whatever number within reason is used as a plug.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

http://collegeprowler.com/uc-berkeley/diversity/

Whites at Berkeley are 31 percent.  That includes Jews.  Take out 20 percent and you are down to 11 percent like Stanford.  This is a university founded and made great by non Jewish whites from nothing.

http://berkeley.edu/about/fact.shtml#freshman

70% have at least one parent born outside the U.S. (2008)

Living alumni: 431,500 (August 2009)

http://metrics.vcbf.berkeley.edu/Berkeley%20Template.pdf

Race/Ethnicity

Counts for the Fall 2003 entering class shown in the graph above:

Total 24,636

African American / Black 841 3%
American Indian / Alaskan Native 126 1%
Asian / Pacific Islander 10,272 42%

Hispanic 2,839 12%

White 7,755 31% •

Race/Ethnicity Unknown 2,017 8%

Total Citizens and Immigrants 23,850 97%

International 786 3%

==

http://www.oid.ucla.edu/publications/teachersguide/policies/universitycontext/index.html

Ethnic minorities constitute over one half of the undergraduate student population. As of Fall 2006, the UCLA undergraduate student body, excluding transfer students, was 44% Asian American, 31% White, 13% Chicano/Latino, 2% African American, less than 1% Native American, 3% International, and 7% Other/Unknown.

==

The Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews is eliminating whites from the universities whites founded.  Note the 31 percent number for whites.  It was 31.5 percent white at Stanford and 31 percent white at Berkeley.  That is before subtracting out Jews.  Once that is done one is down to under 20 percent whites, likely 10 percent whites.  Harvard was 48 percent white gross minus 31 percent Jewish for 17 percent white net.

The Slicer Coalition is blacks and Hispanics taking off the bottom and Jews and Asians off the top.  Jews are left in control by verbal dominance and their networking skills and group cohesion.  They bully the others and thus control the coalition.  Thus Jews have replaced whites at the elite schools in terms of control.  They erase the national pattern of whites and replace it with that of their own.  The removal of the cross in the Mojave desert, now on the way out of California for whites, symbolizes this complete erasing of the national pattern of whites.

This is why we have the right to separation from blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews. They are erasing our national pattern. That is generalized genocide.  That is followed by imposing their pattern.  That is followed by their replacing our genes by their own coalition.  That is guaranteed by new immigration according to the Wright Island Model and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

Discussion in above paragraphs is taken from:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/aclu-eliasberg-argues-separation-must-be-total/

==

Jews are practicing generalized genocide on whites by erasing their national pattern.  Affirmative Action is part of that.  Norbert Schlei a Jew wrote it.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Debate thread on Slicer Coalition

http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/why-i-always-wind-up-defending-the-jews/

==

==Slicer Coalition is Generalized Genocide

Subtitle: Cut off the genetic head and the white ethnic stock is dead.

This is part of Lemkin’s Generalized Genocide.

“Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group;”

Removal of the native stock from its dominant position at the universities it founded and created out of nothing is a critical part of Generalized Genocide.  It removes leadership.  It puts the non-native group on the fast track into government and industry where they hired their own from below top schools.  Rest of Lemkin quote just above.

the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

==

The Slicer Coalition is alive and working.  Its led and funded by Jews.  A Jew wrote the 1964 Civil Rights Act.  Its upheld and defended by Jewish justices like Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

=

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Am a Product of Affirmative Action

Jul 8, 2009 Emily Bazelon has an interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Tuesday’s New York Times, in which she talks with the judge about both Sonia
http://www.politicsdaily.com/…/ruthbaderginsburg-i-am-a-product-of-affirmativeaction/ –

==

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/07/08/ruth-bader-ginsburg-i-am-a-product-of-affirmative-action/

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

The data at the universities shows what is happening.  The use of affirmative action by the Slicer Coalition to remove whites from top jobs in academia, business and government is the dispossession of whites from their land.  Those institutions then support ethnic replacement immigration.   This is math.  Why aren’t these supposedly smarter Jews and Asians pointing out the Wright Island Model says non-white immigration is genocide of whites?  Why aren’t they pointing out its already happening at top universities?

http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2009/11/quick-links-22-nov-2009.html

Substitute “jewish” for “islamic” and you get… Choosing the chosen people – The Daily Princetonian – a student body that’s 13% jewish isn’t good enough, it should be 25% jewish like Harvard, Brown, Columbia and Penn. Commenters clash.

The same math is at Princeton, just not as severe as elsewhere.  Jews are leading the Slicer Coalition before us on the Internet at Princeton.

Posted by
Old Atlantic

Princeton stats by ethnicity here, page 3 of pdf:

http://registrar.princeton.edu/university_enrol…

Whites are already under 50 percent at Princeton as undergrads. Subtract out the 13 percent Jewish and non-Jewish whites are under 37 percent.

At Harvard, non Jewish whites are about 18 percent compared to Jews of about 30 percent. At Stanford, non-Jewish whites are under 20 percent. Similar numbers at UCLA and Berkeley. The data are below. For Jewish percentages you can find Jewish groups with estimates.

Harvard stats:

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsh…

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergradua…

http://www.oid.ucla.edu/publications/teachersgu…

http://metrics.vcbf.berkeley.edu/Berkeley%20Tem…

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2004/may5/breyer-55.html

But his most frank comments came when asked by moderator Charles Ogletree how he came to reach his decision in last year’s Grutter v. Bollinger case that upheld the right of Michigan’s law school to consider race in its admissions decisions.

“I think it’s the most important case that I’ve participated in since I was appointed to the Supreme Court,” Breyer told a crowd of about 400 people gathered in Memorial Auditorium Saturday morning. “A lot turned on that case, and I don’t think it was an easy case.”

Breyer said the case centered on the court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause and also, to a lesser degree, the notion that an entity like Michigan’s law school has a right to determine its own policies. Breyer said he believed that the school’s affirmative action policies were sound efforts to level the playing field for disadvantaged minorities — “not to say that the law will protect you any less, but to give you the opportunities that everybody else has so that you can be treated equally.”

As the above stats show, non-Jewish whites are down to 20 percent at Harvard where Breyer taught.  Whites are being locked out of being involved in decisions involving affirmative action by the Slicer Coalition run by Jews.  Jews want that and are the leaders of it.  They are benefiting.  They get to control Harvard and the Federal Reserve by squeezing whites out of elite academic institutions.

Whites can’t get that Harvard or Princeton degree and become head of the Fed or write the decisions on the Supreme Court that dispossess whites.  Protestant whites are almost banished from the court.  That happened by the Slicer Coalition.  It was intended.  That Court is genociding whites as the theorem and the statistics and the Lemkin definition show.  They are not struggling with anything but the elimination of the residual of whites who once owned this country.

Saying Jews don’t support affirmative action is part of the art of the Big Schlei.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-big-schlei-1965-immigration-act/

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/23/us/norbert-a-schlei-73-legal-adviser-in-kennedy-johnson-era.html

Schlei was the principal draftsman of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 (corrected).

“I felt I was lucky,” Schlei told the New York Times in 1995, “because I was able to turn what ability I had to something important.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article865261.ece

As Assistant Attorney-General Schlei persuaded Congress to accept changes in American immigration law that have transformed the population; as many as 23 million immigrants are said to have been admitted as a result of the changes.

In 1995 Schlei’s career received a devastating blow when he was tried and convicted of conspiracy and securities fraud …

==

Jewish support for Asian immigration undermines claims they are against affirmative action.  Jews are for Asian immigration to take away slots from whites at elite institutions.

Jews are for the entire bundle of affirmative action combined with Asian immigration to take slots from the top from whites and other non-whites to take slots from the bottom from whites under affirmative action.  This entire bundle of affirmative action and the various types of non-white immigration result in whites being sliced down to 20 percent at UCLA, Stanford, Berkeley and Harvard.  Jews are for all of that.

Jews are trying to reduce whites to a minority at elite institutions and they have succeeded.  This shows they don’t consider themselves white.  They don’t identify with whites but instead identify with the cause of the dispossession of whites as the oppressor of whites.

Jews see themselves replacing whites at the top.  They see this as their chance.  They see removing whites from even deciding affirmative action cases at the Supreme Court or even analyzing them at elite law institutions.   They see this set of related methods as a way to decapitate whites.

Whites are removed from all elite institutions as any effective group and the remainder of white proles die in the fields and factories, where they are replaced by non-whites of Jewish choosing.  There is no place left for whites in this plan.  Jews support the whole bundle as shown by their 80 percent support of Obama.  This is their plan.  Obama is the perfect person to implement their plan.  They staffed his campaign and his White House.  This is their operation and their man.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “re Guy White Black-Jewish Relations post-1968”

  1. cheerfully anonymous Says:

    “Jews see themselves replacing whites at the top. They see this as their chance. They see removing whites from even deciding affirmative action cases at the Supreme Court or even analyzing them at elite law institutions. They see this set of related methods as a way to decapitate whites.

    Whites are removed from all elite institutions as any effective group and the remainder of white proles die in the fields and factories, where they are replaced by non-whites of Jewish choosing. There is no place left for whites in this plan. Jews support the whole bundle as shown by their 80 percent support of Obama. This is their plan. Obama is the perfect person to implement their plan. They staffed his campaign and his White House. ”

    One hopes this isn’t so, but even if it isn’t the effect is much the same. Whites need to try and convert Jews to the observation that the West is wealthy and different because of whites and their cultural traditions and that peoples are not mere replacement parts. If a signifigant numbers of Jews had spent the last thousand years in a place like Africa, I’d imagine they’d tell people like Abe Foxman much the same thing: “stop this madness, we are going to ruin this place that we have elected to live in”.

    What whites need to do (aside from converting Jews to the notion that all whites are not secretely would-be followers of fascism), is to cultivate a positive white consciousness and identity movement that emphasizes white achievements historically, culturally, and scientifically. They need to use cultural outposts like churches, myspace pages, facebook, and white dating sites as places where assortive mating amongst their own can take place and the movement needs to emphasize the need for plenty of whites to have a third child if possible, but at least two children. Whites need to be made fully aware of their declining demography and what a replacement birthrate is, and the notion of, “strength-in-numbers” needs to be instilled within them. In other words, they need to sort of emulate the Jews. Im fairly certain that the cultural smog that has given whites a cough will give the other races pneumonia over the next 100 years. I imagine the birthrate decline of other races, with less future-time orientation and more impulsiveness, will fall off more dramatically than white race fertility has in the past 30 years here as the new century gets into its second half and they lose their religous beliefs. The forces of PC no doubt, will be displeased by this and will try to get them to breed more, but once the lid is taken off pandora’s box and feminism is introduced within a population, a result like that of Korea, Japan, and Iran (1.7 birthate in Iran) is probably a barely avoidable consequence. A white “boosterism” movement replete with scholarships and networking amongst white people of european decent need not be a ‘hate’ oriented movement and could really be a respite from the choking air of obvious PC lies and misinformation. Whites, in short, need to strive to become an elite in and of themselves. The internet, with its plethora of learning resources, is there to give a drastic advantage to any youths who simply are willing to use it.

    Whites need to emphasize Christianity even if they dont believe in it to keep fertility up and the patriarichal-nuclear family prevalent. White males in the West who decide to marry non-white females need to take special care to raise their children in the traditions of the West so that their half-mestizo, half-asian, or half-whatever kids see themselves as white westerners, and adopt white culture and traditions as much as possible so that these kids dont get lost in the groundswell of the cultural smog that the MSM feeds them and identify with “the other”.

    Most importantly some white conservatives with the money to do so need to start looking for ways to buy up some of the media in this country especially. One network and a daily newspaper in every major city that is supportive of the West could do so much to gut the cultural smog of PC. It only takes a little light to dispell a lot of lies and false notions spread about by the idea-mandarins we have now.

    I think the most important idea espoused above (other than having a positive white consciousness movement arise) is the prosetlyization of jews to the notion of American and European whites are not secretely nazis waiting for whatever event to galvanize themselves into some sort of fascist movement against the rest of humanity. The years between 1934-1944 were a anomaly brought upon us by a very bad post-war treaty, poverty, and some very crafty scapegoating instilled by a professional propaganda campaign directed at a financially distressed people who were encouraged to see themselves as victims. It was one of the first really effective mass psy-ops in history and got a traditionally even-tempered folk to act irrationally. It is very unlikely anything like that would ever happen again in the age of television and the internet. Whites would do well to disabuse Jews of the notion that we are so liable to lash out like that in the rest of the west.

  2. Sidearm Says:

    The only thing I want to convert jews to is the belief that the game is finally up. I think some of them are beginning to wonder/panic


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: