Can Jews reconcile with Whites? A program to consider.

October 20, 2010

Can Jews reconcile with Whites? Is it possible? Are Jews by their nature alienated from Whites and unable to resist trying to undermine White control of White countries?

The following would be a possible program for Jews to adopt to show they can reconcile with Whites.

==Reconciliation Program of Jews with White Christians. Jews would adopt the following:

America would become a White Christian country.

All persons would swear loyalty to America as a White Christian country.

Whites would maintain voting control of America regardless of their numbers.

End non-White immigration, student visas, family reunification, asylum, refugees, guest workers, Agjobs, etc.

Start process of blacks, Latinos and Asians returning to their own continents. Acknowledge they already have the largest continents and don’t need ours and that their taking ours is ethnic cleansing.

Support return of Muslims and non-Whites in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand to their home continents.

Acknowledge that the White Race is the result of unique evolution and that it must not be permitted to be lost in mixing with the other races. Acknowledge such mixing is itself a crime against humanity and a crime against evolution.

Segregation of schools, prisons and the military by race and religion.

Declare Islam not a religion and require Muslims to leave. All mosques would be forfeit.

End anchor baby.

Acknowledge and teach in the schools that Whites had to take measures to protect themselves.

Support the return of White rule and Apartheid for South Africa.

Break up the large banks and make the banks small. This could mean state or regional banking.

Restore Ivy League and 19th century colleges to be White Christian colleges. The Ivy League should specifically uphold White Protestant America. They would be majority Founding Stock Americans in students and faculty and over 90 percent White Christian students and faculty.

End affirmative action.

Segregate the military. The military academies would be White Christian academies.

Allow freedom to study and write about Jews (and others) and their role in history and to maintain any position about them or others.

Allow free commenting about the role of Jews or other groups without having comments deleted or losing jobs or being subjected to persecution or fear because of it.

==end of program

The above program would show that Jews were loyal to White Christian America. If Jews were to adopt this program, then reconciliation would likely happen, especially starting from the current situation.

In fact, Jews are opposed to almost every one of these positions. This is true of Jewish organizations and with rare exceptions, Jews themselves oppose most of them is a reasonable working hypothesis.

Jews have worked and contributed money and time and even been killed in the 1960’s in the South to undermine and reverse White Christian America and take away everyone of the freedoms and rights listed above from White Christian America. Jews have contributed fanatics to the causes of taking away these freedoms and rights from Whites which amounts constructively (or deconstructively) to taking away America from Whites.

Jews have also used their opportunities as lawyers, judges, legislators, aides, professors, staffers, etc. to undermine White Christian America and take away the rights and freedoms listed above from White Christians. This has amounted to a program of dispossession ending in ethnic cleansing of White Christian America.

Jews have supported dispossession of White Christian America and are now among the leaders in supporting its ultimate conclusion of genocide of White Christians by race replacement substitution. This now means the loss of Social Security and Medicare to White Christians and leaving them destitute in a country they founded and let be taken from them.

One could say that Jews have long since decided which side they were on in this struggle. It is a war since its outcome is the dispossession and ethnic cleansing of a people of their country. Jews have supported that dispossession and ethnic cleansing of Whites and have furnished some of its most important leaders.

Jews openly lead for all these rights and freedoms to be lost forever to Whites. That Jews have taken a side and it is against White Christians is thus a fact at the present time. Whether Jews can switch or not is open to debate, but that they have chosen the side against White Christians is a fact already determined.

It would take a monumental reverse of direction for Jews to switch sides from being for White Christian dispossession ending in the ethnic cleansing going on now to being for White Christians and to stop and reverse the dispossession and ethnic cleansing of White Christians. Being on the side of White Christians does not mean finishing them off slowly or the status quo but reversing it along the lines of the list given above. That is what it would mean for Jews to reconcile with White Christians.

Note that no reconciliation between White Christians and Jews is possible as long as Jews oppose the right of White Christians to speak openly about Jews. That includes Rick Sanchez and others. If Jews oppose freedom of speech for White Christians to state their grievances with Jews and their perception of the role of Jews in the dispossession and ethnic cleansing of White Christians, then Jews have already ended the possibility of reconciliation and of ever being on the side of White Christians or for the restoration of White Christian America.

Reconciliation can openly come from open dialogue between White Christians and Jews. If Jews response to such dialogue is to simply shout anti-Semite and threaten jobs and doing business, then they have already closed off reconciliation. That approach to dialogue by Jews is not approaching reconciliation with a serious intent, but simply continuing the dispossession and ethnic cleansing of White Christians. This is what we have now from Jews. This shows that as of now, Jews are still pushing dispossession of Whites and the ethnic cleansing of Whites now underway.



Frum is feeling the heat from his irrelevance. He now acknowledges the multicult has failed in Germany.

Of course, the Frumbag is half empty because he still doesn’t say stop immigration and reverse it. Maybe its 2/3 empty. He could also say to stop and reverse it here too. So maybe its mostly empty.


Jeez, what a moron you are. Frum has been against mass immigration and multiculturalism for the last two decades. He writes anti-immigration articles that could be published at, if they didn’t have his name on the byline. Obviously he’s not in there with Alternative Right, but he’s very clearly anti-immigration.

You’re so dumb you’re not even lying when you spout this nonsense. I guess that’s something you can be proud of.

The following are some comments at Alternative Right by OA and a short quote from one by Aaron on David Frum.

“Frum has been against mass immigration and multiculturalism for the last two decades. ” Aaron.

Can you cite an article from 1990 where he opposed mass immigration? Bush Sr. increased immigration in 1990. Did Frum oppose that?

“Public Law 101-649 (Act of November 29, 1990), which increased the limits on legal immigration to the United States” From USCIS. Nov 29, 1990 is within 20 years going back. That falls within your window. So you should be able to find an article by Frum opposing that act.

” How I Rethought Immigration
One Man’s Confessions
By David Frum | National Review
Monday, June 25, 2007 ”

“The last time America debated amnesty for illegal aliens, I was on the other side. The year was 1986. I was a student at law school and an occasional contributor to this magazine. I believed then that immigration was a great thing, the more the better. ”

In September 2010 there was a CIS conference on immigration where Frum spoke.
Transcript and video here:

Search on “Can Conservatism Survive Mass Immigration” to find out more on it. One hit is here at Vdare:

“Based on the good things Frum and Ponnuru said towards the beginning of their remarks, it is clear that they understand that mass immigration poses a huge threat to this country. But not only are they unwilling to fight for this country, they are undermining and attacking those who do. ”


As long as Jews continue to throw at us anti-Semite when we discuss our views of them and their actions, we know they are not interested in reconciliation but are still pursuing our dispossession and ethnic cleansing. When Jews seek to take away our right to have a side in the dialogue, we know by that alone that it is not a reconciliation dialogue but the continuation of our dispossession and ethnic cleansing. That is what we have now.

== More at Alt Right with Aaron


That 2007 article is probably the main source. I’m not going to go reread it or reread any other article now. I didn’t follow the VDARE links, but I do remember a very tendentious and dishonest article there by Sam Francis about something Frum wrote on immigration, I think in National Review. Francis and others at VDARE obviously had an ax to grind for Frum (justifiably). They smeared him as he smeared them. You can’t take their word on this any more than you can take Frum’s word in “Unpatriotic Conservatives”.


OA reply to Aaron:

Thank you for your constructive comment. The article Unpatriotic Conservatives is here:


In 1991 Pat Buchanan had accused the neoconservatives of enforcing the “limits of permissible dissent.” The paleocons were now defying those limits with ever-increasing gusto and boldness.

“The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of the creating people.” — SAMUEL FRANCIS, SPEECH AT THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE CONFERENCE, MAY 1994

OF all the limits against which the paleoconservatives chafed, the single most irksome was the limit placed by civilized opinion upon overtly racialist speech. Francis’s speech at the 1994 conference of the white-supremacist American Renaissance organization, for example, ultimately cost him his job as a staff columnist at the Washington Times.

end quote


This is how Frum ends that piece:


There is, however, a fringe attached to the conservative world that cannot overcome its despair and alienation. The resentments are too intense, the bitterness too unappeasable. Only the boldest of them as yet explicitly acknowledge their wish to see the United States defeated in the War on Terror. But they are thinking about defeat, and wishing for it, and they will take pleasure in it if it should happen.

They began by hating the neoconservatives. They came to hate their party and this president. They have finished by hating their country.

War is a great clarifier. It forces people to take sides. The paleoconservatives have chosen — and the rest of us must choose too. In a time of danger, they have turned their backs on their country. Now we turn our backs on them.

end Quote

That seems a definite taking sides by Frum. Who is the fringe and who decides who is the fringe?

Frum’s answer is that Canadian Frum is the center of America and that White Christians with an explicit White Christian identity and advocacy are the fringe. Pat Buchanan whose ancestors fought in the civil war is unpatriotic fringe and Frum turns his back on Pat Buchanan and all those Buchanan represents.


Sailer on Frum on immigration, Whites and pro-White advocates:

Frum hates Whites. Frum hates Whites who advocate for White rights and the right of Whites to keep their lands. Frum opposes the idea of Whites with White identity possessing America as theirs.

This amounts to opposing the survival of a people or race of Whites who have a self aware and expressed White identity possessing the country in their own name.


Sephardi leader Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews

October 18, 2010

JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat,” he said to some laughter.

Is he afraid he will lose his job? Does he have to apologize. Ask Rick Sanchez. Ask Derek Fenton. Ask James Weinstein who fired Fenton. Ask Jonathan Klein who fired Lou Dobbs.

At 10/19/2010 6:32 PM, Anonymous Chris said…

Former Chief Sephardic Rabbi last week: “Goyim were born only to serve us.”

This isn’t some obscure nut in a basement but one of the most influential spiritual leaders in Israel.

Israel requires a loyalty oath to Israel as a Democratic Jewish state.

Note that Frum in effects calls Whites who are pro-White racist and White supremacist. Others will call them anti-Semitic. The above program might be called anti-Semitic by many Jews. This just shows that a reconciliation dialogue is not even possible. Israel has a loyalty oath for non-Jews and yet to discuss a loyalty oath to White Christian America while White Christians are dispossessed and ethnically cleansed is racist or White supremacist or anti-Semitic, assuming such a criticism is mounted.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: