Anti-Christ tries to break the nations before Christ

May 26, 2011

Breaking the nations is done by the Messiah according to Psalms 2, but only at the end of times.

Breaking the nations before the Messiah is what the anti-Christ does. It is also what immigration lawyers do.

Break the nations rhetoric

Nation of immigrants.

Immigration forever.

Everyone supports legal immigration.

People on the other side of the border are just as valuable and cheaper.


What we have is an elite trans-nation of nation breakers. When the nation is saved from the nation breakers, the nation breakers must go.

See article and comments at

(Following was quoted by A3P but was subsequently removed as not representing their view.)

“At different times this country will need different levels of immigration, but we will always need new immigrants. People on one side of a border are not more “valuable” than people on another side of a border. ” These two sentences are among the worst. If they want to be our leaders they should think and say people on our side of the border are more valuable to them as our leaders. That means not taking their future and increasingly present by allowing immigration.

This is more like Libertarian boilerplate. People are interchangeable parts. This is like you go to a large company meeting to hear some rah rah and the management says they are the company and we are just components that can be replaced. This is what a multinational company says not an ethnopatriot party.

I want to hear that the Founding Stock Americans and those closely related to us from Europe who came after are a unique people and can’t be replaced. I want to hear that we are now our own old wineskin and that there will be no more new wine. Immigration implies as a mathematical theorem, the Wright Island Model, complete genetic replacement not a mixture of old and new as an asymptotic state. Isn’t A3P suppose to tell the mathematical and scientific truth that immigration is bad? Not some boilerplate written by immigration lawyers for H-1b, guest worker, student visa, etc?

These sentences they state are put forward as fundamental principles. Whereas the opposition to illegal immigration is based on contingent facts and is not a principle.

“People on one side of a border are not more “valuable” than people on another side of a border.”

Libertarianism and communism come together in this sentence as their founding principle that can’t be given up. They are flavors of economism. They are opposed to the idea that people are an organic biological entity that is unique and has a right to life of its own. Economism is the enemy of the organic people as a living entity with a right to its own separate identity. All versions of economism make the economy their fundamental principle and oppose the biological or organic conception of the people as a legitimate entity. Moreover, economism in all its flavors tries to break and destroy distinct peoples, with one exception of course.

More from A3p post

Meanwhile, the law abiding people that would like to get into this country legally are put through absolute hell. I used to practice law and I have filled out immigration forms. The process is a complete and total nightmare.

So we have been making it really easy for law breakers to sneak in the back door of our country and we have been making it really hard for law abiding people to get in the front door.

What in the world could be wrong about wanting to fix that?

Once many illegal immigrants arrive in the United States they either try to make a living legally (by directly competing with blue collar American workers for jobs and driving their wages down) or illegally by selling drugs or being involved in other kinds of criminal activity.

This is immigration lawyer pro immigration rhetoric. It is not fixing the border to make it easier to immigrate legally. It is breaking the nations with a rod of pig iron immigration. If that is hate speech, then so is Psalms 2.

Asians taking over Berkeley and engineering is part of beheading a nation. Fjordman wrote about beheading as a strategy at Brussels Journal in 2006. He was talking about taking our cities from us with immigration.

Harvard is less than 25 percent White Christian. That is beheading us.


One Response to “Anti-Christ tries to break the nations before Christ”

  1. Vanishing_1 Says:

    OA – thanks for writing about this and for the link. You make some very good points.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: