Archive for November, 2012

Ian Jobling done in by no pay blogging

November 29, 2012

Ian Jobling has become lost to our movement.  Even while in it, he was irksome to many.

=Excerpt Occidental Dissent

H/T White Reference

If you remember this guy, he used to run “Inverted World” and “White America.” I sparred with him quite often. He used to defend the Iraq War and post absurd articles that invoked John Rawls to justify racialism.

Update: Auster on Jobling.



  1. Blogs are low status.
  2. If you blog too much it hurts your sales of whatever you sell.
  3. Too big a blog and people read your blog instead of purchasing what you sell.
  4. People will read your blog, like what they read and have contempt for you for providing it for free.  They will then pay money for a book they don’t like, don’t agree with and from someone they consider an enemy.  This is how they are programmed.  They can’t behave differently.
  5. This is how people react, it does not matter how they should react.
  6. Jobling’s writing was too good for a blog.  He was too good a writer and took too much care with his writing and self editing for it to be acceptable for him to provide that for free.
  7. Thus the very quality of his writing and self editing made people despise him even as they read everything he wrote, thought it was well written, and agreed with him.  They are status driven and can’t react differently.
  8. Our movement can’t support people financially.
  9. People get desperate and offer for free what they should charge for, their time and the product of their time.
  10. The inconsistencies and unfairness of this built up for Jobling until he could not handle it any more and quit.  He then turned on us for doing this to him, even though as status monkeys we are incapable of doing otherwise.
  11. We lack a monetized network where we can sell to each other for good value and support each other.


  1. Blog less.
  2. Write e-books.
  3. Write physical books as well.  These have more status than e-books.
  4. Don’t expect people to behave different than their programming.
  5. People are status monkeys incapable of behaving otherwise.  If you expect them to, you are the one making the mistake.
  6. Work at whatever makes money for you.
  7. Sell your books, services, etc. by giving talks and the traditional methods.
  8. Charge what you are worth.  This applies to books, lectures, services, etc.  If you don’t charge enough, you won’t work hard enough selling it.
  9. Price what you create high enough to pay for everyone who would normally contribute to it, even if that person is you.
  10. Network.
  11. Boost others to sell their product, services, books, consulting, etc.
  12. Acquire skills and credentials that let you sell.
  13. Charge the market rate.
  14. Do an extra good job.
  15. Network among our people.
  16. Do an extra good job for them.
  17. Don’t give up when others let you down.
  18. We are in a downward spiral because of the external forces on us.  The math of immigration is replacement math.  We are feeling this.  Rise to the challenge.
  19. Exercise, cut back on alcohol.  Cut back on caffeine after noon.  Sleep well.
  20. Invest back into the network of our people.  Use their services and products and if good recommend them in person and on Amazon, or Yelp or whatever is appropriate.
  21. Save money.  Spend your money on the products and services of those in the movement.
  22. Do a little to fight your tendency to disdain or fight others in our movement because of your status programming.
  23. We need real networking, commerce, monetized interactions and the patience of Job.

The reality of low wages, low employment to population ratios for men, intermittent employment, financial instability, damaged marriages that result, and the ramifications are piling up.

The provident Whites have fewer children.  The improvident non-Whites will stop having children when the government collapses financially.  This has to happen because the Wright Island Model implies mathematically complete replacement of every gene of every person of every race and every mixed person.  Every gene line goes extinct.  As this happens, bad behavior will increase.  But it can’t be stopped until immigration is stopped, whatever the racial composition of the immigration.  This is math.


Note also that Hunter Wallace and Occidental Dissent are not anti-Semitic and that it is inappropriate to label them that way.  It is legitimate to discuss each group and their interactions with others in a multigroup situation.  This means the grievances of one group can’t be dismissed with a special name as not valid and indicating of mental illness or of deviance that takes them beyond the pale.

The same applies to Kevin MacDonald’s work, which is legitimate scientific work.  One can disagree or not with it, but to label it with a special name as deviant is not appropriate.  It has to be met with on the basis of facts and arguments not designating it as beyond the pale and leaving off.  This is what SPLC specializes in as a method and in fact all Liberal thought control elements do that.  They don’t admit evidence or rational debate.

Labeling systematic analysis of one group in a multigroup game as deviant by a player is not scientific, but it is a move within game theory to gain advantage.  Thus such a play itself is evidence of a type of move in a multi-group game.  That type of move can be studied and doing so is legitimate. When that study is then labeled as deviant by a player in the game, that is simply part of the game and thus part of the study.

In multiple move games, behavior over time is the basis of moves and strategies by players. So if one player or group consistently favors its own or harms another particular group, then game theory implies that the target will analyze this, publish it to its own group, and impose costs and sanctions on the group or individual doing this to them.   It then goes back and forth.  This is game theory and to label it as deviant is just a move, not science or reason.

Moreover, game theory implies that the target group would react more to such a move of labeling them as deviant to notice and respond to bad behavior directed at them systematically from one group.  Thus Kevin MacDonald’s work is the rational response within the game from the target group.  So are bloggers who notice and point this out.

Those who want to dispute Darwin or evolution should also have a greater tolerance for the scientific views of others.


The voting pattern of Jewish senators for affirmative action and immigration is sufficient basis to conclude that the Jewish group player in the game is acting to reduce Whites to a minority.   This is an adverse event for Whites.  This opens the door for systematic study by Kevin MacDonald or bloggers.

Jewish humor against Whites is also systematic and documented.  So this is sufficient to allow Whites to study this as a game move and to respond with their own humor as a game move.

Moreover, Jews by their immigration policy and affirmative action policy have increased Diversity and thus group solidarity and conflict.  They know by their history that this is what happens when that happens.  So it is part of the game to study it and to respond to it.  That includes with the literary and other arts, which Jews use against Whites.


Game theory and evolution are linked subjects and obviously link to genetic based group differences.  It is therefore a valid part of studying evolution to study conflict between groups which can be distinguished in terms of genetics, whether current or lineage.


Not to defend the above is to fold on scientific method, the right to have our own literary works which express our group experience and point of view, and to participate in the game for our group.  In the evolutionary game, such a disarmament would imply group extinction for Whites.  Free speech is a mechanism for group survival and we should not give it up without being defeated totally.  This includes scientific and literary work that express our experience, our conflict with a specific group, and that group’s own literary and labeling efforts against us.

Moreover, a demand from a group we do that would itself be evidence of that group’s intention that we go extinct as a group.  Actions by that group to carry out sanctions on Whites for expressing our group experience and point of view in conflict with that group would also be evidence of intention.  This is what Kevin MacDonald and others do.


The fact that we have to keep coming back to our group’s right to notice and comment on the hostility of another group towards us is itself evidence of a problem and systematic moves by the other group against us.  Since when is noticing obvious harm inflicted on us such as Senate voting patterns for affirmative action and immigration a sign of mental deviance or of improper behavior?  Game theory says we should notice it. So does evolution.  So does common sense.

The Declaration of Independence was not a declaration not to notice systematic harm or abuse directed our way by another group.  It was the contrary.  Moreover, the DofI says where such conflict is sustained and systematic such as in Senate voting patterns on immigration, separation is the correct solution.  This is our founding document as a country.  So we can invoke it to justify our own response today.

Moreover, reducing us to a minority is part of reducing us to an absolute despotism, and certainly a relatively greater despotism than in 1776.  This has in fact already happened and is growing worse. Thus we can resort to the arguments and remedies of the Declaration of Independence.


Are game theory and evolution, at least when applied to humans, to be thought crimes because one group sees them as adverse to their strategy and tactics?   Can they be labeled as deviant with a special word for that?   Can they be labeled as deviant when applied to one group to analyze it, but as non-deviant when applied in the same way to another group to analyze it?

Isn’t this evidence of a strategy by the group in question?  A strategy adverse to the target group? And if maintained over time and by different individuals of that group, then it is a group strategy and even a group strategy?  This is the Culture of One Way Critique?  What you do is bad based on science, but what we do you can’t talk about.  Is this not a strategy and an adverse one to the target group?  So the target can analyze it and notice it and discuss it and develop a strategy to take account of it.  Separation is the obvious strategy that comes to mind.  Whether separation by country club, office, and school or by country this is the indicated solution.

Dispossession of White Christians from Harvard is an example of how they lost in this group struggle.  It is an example of adverse action by the other group to dispossess us.  We can notice it and analyze it.  Kevin MacDonald or bloggers have every right to.  Moreover, to receive funding in grants to do so.

Trying to label him as deviant or this work as deviant to deny funding is a move in the game and we can analyze it and receive funding to do so.


Dying to tell you I’m not dead

November 13, 2012

Sorry to disappoint, I have to tell it true

I haven’t died yet

And you’ll have to muddle through


Oh what a foul it is to die as a blogger.

Not to care at all.

To be called a bloody brute

who never thinks of y’all.


Of course, for my ‘umble self

I leave off a month or two

No one seems to notice

Myself included too.



Dedicated to all the blog gents and ladies who have left off blogging without a word.

No obligation to tell us anything.

If you go on the great walk about of regular life, you don’t have to tell your friends in blog space.

We do it too.


Take your occasional comment poster.  They go off and never say a word.  How do you know what happened to them?  No way to know.

Now does anyone post about lost commenters?  Do we contact random funerals, asking them are you the commenter who left off my blog back in ’08?  Cause I’m mighty curious, don’t you know?

Or say Fred left off commenting.  Now do I think, he left a name of Fred, so I’ll read the obits for Freds and then contact their families.

Dear Family of Fred,

Wot I want to know, if you’d be ever so kind, is to tell me true if your Fred in the ground is my Fred who left comments at my venue?

Sincerely yours,

Ever so anxious to know

Old Atlantic


An if I get no response, do I then blog up about how Fred is the rudest commenter I ever knew?  He left off commenting and now I don’t know if he is dead or wounded or captured by natives.


Now I admit, every so often a regular Mary Poppins may have a blog and leave off, and then we have to wonder where she went to.    So when your Mary Poppins blogger is gone, just hum a little tune.



In every blog that must be done
There is an element of fun
You find the fun and snap!
The blog”s a game

And every post you undertake
Becomes a piece of cake
A lark! A spree! It’s very clear to see that…

A Spoonful of blogger helps the White man in town
The White man in gown
The White man who frowns
Just a spoonful of sugar helps the White man who’s down
In a most delightful way


And so when Mary Poppins is away, we’ll just have to do our best today.

No need to abuse your mates or fret about her fate.  We’re all going to go missing too. Get on with what you have to do.

Romney stripped northern factories sending some South some to Asia

November 8, 2012

Some of the factory jobs stripped out of the North and Midwest went to the South. This included foreign car manufacturers who picked the South for many of their factories.

So the North was actually ravaged more by Romney’s Bain Capital than the South.  The South was benefiting from some of Romney’s predation in the North.

The towns Romney flew into for asset stripping in the 1980s and 1990s were towns in the North and Midwest. He stripped them down.

Thus the North and Midwest saw the worst of Romney in the 1980s and 1990s.  It made sense for them to vote against Romney.

The South were partially benefiting from Bain Capital asset stripping the industrial North and Midwest in the 1980s and 1990s. So their voting for Romney was based on not seeing his worst side.

Romney intended to finish them off with legal immigration, but they apparently could not calculate that far ahead.

Voting against Romney was what all Whites should have done.  Southern Whites should have voted for Goode to send a message not to Obama but to Romney and the GOP.

Until Southern Whites vote 3rd party types like Goode who are their own people advocating an end of green cards, they will be chumps to the Romneys and Roves.  It is Southern Whites who hurt our people by voting for Romney, not Northern Whites who voted for Obama to cling to their health care after Romney stripped their factory jobs.

Romney is still sitting on his loot in the Cayman Islands and not paying much tax on it.  Voting for Romney is voting for the thief who stole your town’s factory and left it devastated.  Romney was called a raider for a reason.  Romney was like a raider who burned and salted the earth to prevent you farming again.  Romney was the worst pillager in history in that sense.

Voting for Romney is like voting for the worst of barbarian invaders to come back.  It really made no sense.

I voted against Romney in the primary and in the general.    That is what made sense.

Southern Whites need to switch out of a GOP sending us Rubios and Jindals and Haleys.  Not voting for Goode was the stupidest mistake Southern Whites have made in a long time. All it has gotten them is the next wave of Rubios and Christies thrown at them by their neocon overlords.  This alone should convince them they made the wrong choice to vote for Romney over Goode.  They really voted against themselves. That is how the GOP sees it.

If the South had voted Goode, the GOP wouldn’t be talking Rubio. They would be talking getting Goode back in the party. They would be talking Buchanan as elder statesman.  That isn’t happening. They are talking Jeb Bush, Christie, Rubio.  That proves Southern Whites voted wrong.

Romney offered White working class and middle class loss of job from immigration

November 8, 2012

Romney saw legal immigration as the way to keep wages low for working class Whites and middle class Whites. To Romenemy, firing Whites at age 40 and replacing them by young immigrants at lower wages is wonderful. What makes it more wonderful is if Medicare is a voucher that pays less and less.

This was Romney’s program.  Northern Whites voted against it.  This is because they are not beset by diversity that they have to vote White no matter how bad the White is.

It was Southern Whites who voted Romney who should have voted for Goode. Goode was the revolution Trump was talking about.   If Southern and Mountain state Whites had voted Goode and Northern Whites Obama, Romney would have been left with nothing.

That would give you a revolution.  That is what should have happened.  Southern Whites made the mistake of voting for someone that Northern Whites recognized as their enemy.

Romney spent the 1980s and 1990s flying into towns in the North and Midwest and taking away their factories and shipping them out.  Northern Whites saw through him as their worst enemy.

Southern Whites were the ones who couldn’t see that or act on it, which is worse.

Northern Whites voted for Obama because they need health care because Romney shipped their factories to other countries in the 1980s and 1990s.  That left them dependent on government.

Northern Whites and Midwest Whites have seen the means of production shipped out.  That leaves them with government as all that is left to cling to.

Romney didn’t offer to end immigration and give Northern Whites the chance to rebuild their own secure jobs.  Romney said he loved legal immigration to keep Northern Whites coming back from what Romney did to them in the 1980s and 1990s shipping their factories out.

Yay Romney lost

November 7, 2012

Romney was no friend to White working class or White middle class.  Romney despised us.  Romney disowned us multiple times.  Romney called our flag, the flag of hate.
Do I wish I was pawned by Romney for his tax cuts?


Do I wish Romney brought Somali gangs to attack White children in Maine?

Despite Whites in Maine voting for it, no.

Romney never showed loyalty to a White job.

Romney intended to green card staple and fire Whites at age 40 from good jobs and replace them with cheap Asians.

Romney intends an all Asian Stanford and MIT.

No to Romney.  Another anti-White like Boehner defeated.

We should tunnel within the GOP to use it for our own purposes while voting for 3rd parties and helping them with our money.

Romney was never going to govern to help us.  Good riddance to him.

When Romney lost, did he tell the truth in his farewell speech?


Romney never intended to tell the truth about what is happening to Whites.

Nor do anything about it.


Chris Christie promoting Obama no surprise

November 4, 2012

Chris Christie can’t stand the WASM.   Ha Ha Ha.

Irish Catholic father.

Jeb Bush family vendetta to turn Texas blue revenge against Perotistas

November 4, 2012

The Bush family vendetta against White Americans who voted against Bushes is coming closer to fruition in the Jeb Bush mind.

Steve Sailer writes at Vdare on Jeb Bush’s latest premonition.

This blog has pointed out for years that the Bush family have a vendetta against Whites for voting against GHWB in the 1960s in Texas.

n 1964, Yarborough again won the primary without a runoff and went on to general election victory with 56.2 percent in LBJ’s 1964 Democratic landslide. His Republican Party (GOP) opponent was future president George Herbert Walker Bush who attacked Yarborough as a left-wing demagogue and for his vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Yarborough denounced Bush as an extremist to the right of that year’s GOP nominee for president Barry M. Goldwater and as a rich easterner and a carpetbagger trying to buy a Senate seat.

Thus was formed the Bush aversion to the right wing and to the White wing at the same time.


Bush was elected in 1966 to a House of Representatives seat from the 7th District of Texas, defeating Democrat Frank Briscoe with 57% of the vote;[17] he became the first Republican to represent Houston.[13] Bush’s representative district included Tanglewood, the Houston neighborhood that was his residence;[18] his family had moved into Tanglewood in the 1960s.[19] His voting record in the House was generally conservative:[13] Bush voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1968, although it was generally unpopular in his district.[13] He supported the Nixon administration‘s Vietnam policies, but broke with Republicans on the issue of birth control.[13] Despite being a first-term congressman, Bush was appointed to the powerful House Ways and Means Committee,[12] where he voted to abolish the military draft.[12] He was elected to a second term in 1968.[20]

Bush immediately betrayed his constituents on Civil Rights and other issues.This set the Bush pattern of revenge against Whites who elect them because of the Whites who voted against Bush in 1964.

This was then cemented in 1970 when Bush lost another Senate race.

The Declaration of White Independence from Diversity and White Unification

November 3, 2012

The Declaration of White Independence from Diversity and White Unification

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for White people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with Diversity and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of Whitekind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation from Diversity and White Unification.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all White men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are White Life, White Liberty and the pursuit of White Happiness. — That to secure these White rights, White Governments are instituted among White Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the White governed, — That whenever any Form of Diversity Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the White People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new White Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their White Safety and White Happiness.

White Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Diversity Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that Whitekind are more disposed to suffer Diversity, while  the evils of Diversity are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the Diversity forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of Diversity abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Diversity Despotism, it is their White right, it is their White duty, to throw off such Diversity Government, and to provide new White Guards for their future White security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these White Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Diversity Government. The history of the present King of Diversity is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these White States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has ordered Stand Downs to take away rescue from Whites in harm’s way of Diversity.

He has left Whites in Staten Island without power at the behest of the Mayor of New Diversity.

He has left millions of Whites in the long term unemployed while importing millions of Diversity to take jobs.

He has given over STEM jobs and careers to Asians, denying them to Whites.

He has crushed state and local government under an avalanche of Diversity that has bankrupted them.

He has given his assent to a new entitlement to Diversity that will break the medical delivery system for Whites.

He has imported millions of hostile Diversity under the name of Asylum and Amnesty who have then chased Whites out of schools and homes.

He has given arms to hostile Diversity.

He has overturned friendly governments to institute hostile Diversity in their turn.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to enforcing laws against Diversity Flash Mobs.

He has refused his assent to Diversity Flash Mobs killing Whites being a Hate Crime.

For quartering large bodies of armed Diversity among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the White Inhabitants of these States:

For transporting Diversity from beyond Seas to attack us for pretended offences:

For taking away our White Charters, abolishing our most valuable White institutions and altering fundamentally the Forms of our White Assemblies, Schools, and Universities:

For giving over the rule of our Universities to hostile Diversity to teach Hate of Whites

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries of Diversity to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has excited domestic Diversity insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers and interiors, the merciless Black and Muslim Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free White people.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United White States of America, in General Congress, White Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our White intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good White People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united White Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent White States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to Diversity, and that all political connection between them and the State of Diversity, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent White States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our White Lives, our White Fortunes, and our sacred White Honor.

%d bloggers like this: