Archive for January, 2015

Security men directly in front of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev dropping backpack Boston Marathon Bombing

January 30, 2015

In the photo of Dzokhar Tsarnaev allegedly dropping the backpack in front of the Forum Restaurant there are two security men. One is right in front of Tsarnaev staring right at him it seems.  They might be 2 feet apart.

Martin_Richard_Suspect_Bombing_Boston_Marathon

If you right click and open in a new window it is larger.  You can see the bald man with khaki pants in front of Tsarnaev seeming to stare at him. Behind him is another security type with a backpack. The backpack guy with glasses might be wearing a sweater. He might not be a security type.  But who was he?  Since they both appear to be going bald in the same way, we will treat them both as security types together.

http://www.viralread.com/2013/04/19/photo-boston-suspect-places-backpack-bomb-next-to-8-year-old-boy-who-was-killed-in-blast/

Here is the photo link.

Dzhokhar Dropping Backpack in front of Forum Restaurant in front of 2 security men.

Here is the link explicitly.

http://www.viralread.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Martin_Richard_Suspect_Bombing_Boston_Marathon.jpg

Here is another article with that photo.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34730.htm

http://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/bag-5.png?w=468&h=393

Some observations.

  1. Was the bald headed khaki pants man a security man?  Craft international?
  2. What about the man behind him with the backpack?
  3. Who are they?
  4. Who do they work for?
  5. Were they interviewed?
  6. When?
  7. Will they testify?
  8. Doesn’t the other man’s backpack look closer to the black backpacks reported as the bomb backpacks?  Compared to the off white backpack of Tsarnaev seen in other photos?
  9. Would Tsarnaev drop his backpack while a security type was looking at him 2 feet away?
  10. Did that man not notice a foreign looking teen dropping a backpack?
  11. Tsarnaev has a white cap on backwards.  The security man appears to be staring at him.  How could he not notice a kid in front of him with a backward cap dropping a backpack?
  12. Didn’t the security men have instructions to report backpacks that were dropped?  Isn’t that posted everywhere?
  13. After the bombing, did these 2 security men report that a foreign looking teen dropped a backpack in front of them at the bomb location?
  14. Why didn’t these guys come forward to give a sketch of who they saw at that location who looked suspicious?
  15. Why didn’t they come forward when the FBI was trying to find people in the thousands of photos?
  16. They can also be asked if Tsarnaev still had a backpack on or was carrying one.
  17. The defense can bring them as witnesses to say that they would have noticed that Tsarnaev dropped his backpack and they didn’t.  Thus disproving this photo as showing Tsarnaev dropping a backpack.  Instead that backpack was already there or linked to one of the girls in front.
  18. The defense can bring them as witnesses to prove that Tsarnaev would not drop his backpack while they were almost in his face, with one seeming to stare at Tsarnaev in a belligerent manner.
  19. Why is the bald man with khaki pants the angry looking one?  He looks like he is violent more than Tsarnaev.
  20. If Tsarnaev didn’t drop the backpack then but continued walking as he appears to do, then he is out for dropping the backpack in front of the Forum restaurant.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Why is the FBI distrusted and suspected of False Flags?

January 27, 2015

The network of Moslems turned up by the Boston Bombing investigation are at best apathetic to White Christian America and at worst actively hostile to it. So why so much distrust of the FBI? Is the FBI not protecting us from them?

The leaders of the FBI, their political masters and former high level DOJ and FBI officials spout the rhetoric of multiculturalism, Diversity, immigration forever, etc.  Not just in math, but before our eyes, they are leading to the displacement of White Christians. Yet the rhetoric continues.

A population will not trust a government that ethnic cleanses it. Nor should it. Survival requires it to distrust it.

If the government ethnic cleanses the population by policy, and we see the results in the schools and public transit, we are going to distrust it. Nor will the new replacement people trust a government that ethnic cleanses its own people.

In the 1960s and 1970s, people talked about the population being alienated from the government and the FBI.  Often that meant Blacks in cities were alienated from it.  Now it means Whites.  It really means everyone.

The cities increasingly are hostile to Whites.  Those who occupy them are hostile to Whites and to the government.  They distrust the FBI by definition.

The Whites forced to suburbs and now to outer suburbs also distrust the government that forced them out of the cities. The government is on the side of the nonWhite immigrants displacing us. So naturally, we distrust the government.

When the government says Moslems did a terrorist act, the government then says the real bad guys are the Whites.  The government doesn’t stop nonWhite immigration after a Moslem terrorist attack, they continue it and increase it.

Liberals who push nonWhite immigration are hostile to the FBI and also hostile to the White victims. They are not going to trust the FBI, since they think they are hostile to the liberals doing this to the Whites, including turning cities into nonWhite areas.

Former FBI officials don’t come out and say stop nonWhite immigration. They are silent or continue to support White displacement and the loss of White cities.  They do nothing to connect to Whites or show they represent us or identify with us.

Rudi Giuliani did all he could to make clear that White Southern bigots were the ones he hated and the only people he hates on earth.  He was the one who sent the WTC steel to China before it could be analyzed.  So why shouldn’t we suspect him of a false flag.  He says he hates us and he shows it.

The network spreading out from the Tsarnaev brothers are no friends to White Christian America.  They did all they could to protect the Tsaranevs.  They disposed of evidence, didn’t report them, etc.  They acted like the hostile invaders the Koran says they should be.

But the high level FBI officials, current and retired, continue to push moderate Islam rhetoric and support more Moslem immigration. This is after every attack by Moslems against White Christians. So we have nothing to trust there.

The FBI can’t protect us from Moslems taking over our cities anymore than they could stop Blacks and Hispanics forcing White Christians out of the cities.  So the FBI leadership are simply part of forcing White Christians out of the cities. So there is no reason for White Christians to trust them.

An FBI leadershp that is kosher with White Christians being forced out is one that can be suspected of false flags.  They presumably are in it for the prestige and government contracting type money of a Chertoff Associates type gig in retirement.   So they have abandoned us. False flags simply increase their post retirement revenue and are good for their business.

Once the FBI leadership turned against Whites keeping their cities, distrust and alienation became a certain outcome. That has been the case for decades. Moslems are only the latest iteration of it.

The Tsarnaev network is dangerous.  They are hostile. They are not the friends of White Christian America. But so are the leadership of the FBI and DOJ.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev wants to take credit for the Boston Bombing, the question is why?

January 25, 2015

The note in the boat, the confession in the hospital and the request for court to clear out the conspiracy theorists outside the courthouse all show that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev wants to take credit for the Boston Bombing. The question is why. We need hypotheses and then evidence for and against each one.

  1. Tsarnaev did it alone with his brother and wants credit because he hates White Christian America.
  2. Tsarnaev did it with others beyond his brother, and wants to shield them.
  3. Tsarnaev’s role was smaller and he wants jihad credit for the work of others.
  4. Tsarnaev did some other crime like Waltham Murders and wants to go down for the Boston Bombing as well. This is like serial murders who claim crimes they didn’t do to increase their total.

Guessing is part of the process, but not the end of the process. The investigators have to try to find evidence for or against each hypothesis.

Tracing where the bomb was made, who made it, and how it got to the Tsarnaevs if they planted the bomb is key.

  1. Why didn’t they have 2 guns between them if they did the Boston bombing?
  2. Why didn’t they flee the country?
  3. Who made the bomb?
  4. Did they have the skill?
  5. Do the backpack remains match backpacks that can be linked to the Tsarnaevs?
  6. Who purchased the backpacks?
  7. Where and when?
  8. What was Russia’s role?
  9. What did Tamerlan know of Russia’s role?
  10. What about Moslem groups in Dagestan and Chechnya?
  11. Were they front groups for Russian FSB?
  12. How did they escape attention from NSA?
  13. Shouldn’t NSA be able to trace the purchase of the backpacks? Of the bomb making materials?
  14. Track every Chechen who purchased the materials used to make the bomb. Nails, container, etc.
  15. It doesn’t make sense they can’t put this together and find where the bomb parts were purchased and where they were put together.  This is a major mystery that has to be pursued into the future until  resolved.

It is good to believe a hypothesis for a short period of time, but bad to become stuck in anything not proven conclusively.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Doesn’t the CIA track whatever Russia accuses them of?

January 25, 2015

One would think the CIA has files on everything the Russians accuse them of.  This is not just to counter it, but as clues to what Russia is up to.  Russia has accused the CIA of a lot of things linked to Russia or Chechnya.

  1. Putin accused Shleifer and Hay and implicitly Summers and Fischer of being CIA agents advising Anatoly Chubais before the Boston Bombing.
  2. Russia accused CIA of involvement in the apartment bombings in Russia in 1999 that were used to justify the harshness of the 2nd Chechen war.
  3. Russia tried to link the CIA to killing Dzhokhar Dudayev in 1996.
  4. In 2013, Russia linked the CIA to MH370 and MH17.
  5. in 2013, Russia linked CIA to the alleged Nazis in Ukraine who overthrew the Ukrainian government.  (Evidence it was a Russian plot whatever the State Department thinks.)
  6. Linking CIA to JFK assassination.

Whatever the Russians are trying to link the CIA to should not be blown off as a stupid joke.  It should be tracked and linked to what they are doing.  It also helps show what they planned in advance. The Russians plan things with the idea of blaming them on the CIA.

In the case of the Boston Bombing of April 2013, the Russians may have known of the drill being done in advance.  They may have hoped that the CIA would be blamed for the bombing by some.  They also may be behind some rumors of it. This assumes the FSB planted the plan through Moslem front groups with Tsarnaev.

If the CIA and NSA do track what Russia links the CIA to, they should have been tracking Shleifer, Chechens, the Harvard and MIT economics departments, Berezovsky, etc. prior to the Boston Bombings. How did they lose track of that?

How did they ignore a Russian warning about a Chechen in Boston near the Harvard and MIT profs including near the home of Larry Summers in the gym they used.  Doesn’t make sense they didn’t keep track of that before the Boston Bombing especially after the resignation of Stanley Fischer a week after I sent an email to MIT asking them to invesetigate Fischer, Summers, and Russia and IMF loans.

Then Berezovsky died in March 2013.  That should have led to a very intensive monitoring.  Russia had been blaming things on these guys since the 1990s, so to drop attention from them after a warning about Tamerlan Tsarnaev who was near Summers, Shleifer, Harvard, MIT makes no sense.  Also Harvard Business School was close to the gym Tsarnaev used.  That should also have been an indicator to track the Tsarnaevs.

There should be a tree of accusations by Russia against CIA and everything that links to. This should have linked to Chechens in Boston and Harvard, MIT econ dept and HBS and to the Tsarnaevs who were near it after Russia’s warning.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Tsarnaev take credit scenario because were really guilty of Waltham murders anyhow

January 25, 2015

Another oddball scenario is that the Tsarnaev brothers were at the Boston Marathon with backpacks and not involved. Later when their pictures were published, they realized they would be caught for some other crime such as the Waltham murders.

They decided to make their epic run since they felt they would go out with glory.  Then Dzhokhar took credit for the Boston Bombing in order to leave a memory with jihadis.

This theory has the following benefits.

  1. It explains why the Tsarnaevs did not leave the country after the bombing.
  2. It explains why they could not find how they made the bombs or who gave them to them.
  3. Why they only had one gun.

As a logical possibility, this theory helps focus attention on evidence that links the Tsarnaevs to the bombing itself and not just the chase or the note or confession.

What did we learn from the note or confession?  Only things we already knew?

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Could the Tsarnaev role in Boston Bombing be to distract attention from others?

January 25, 2015

This is just a scenario.  Could the Tsarnaev brothers role been to attract attention to themselves while others planted the bombs? Their role was to ostentatiously wear backpacks to distract attention?  Then when they were the subject of mass attention, they panicked?  Or that was their role too? They volunteered for this mission as jihadis?

Or perhaps they were told to go to the Marathon wearing backpacks but that is all they knew?

Similar scenarios can be constructed.  The public would like to know if we can eliminate this type of scenario.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev seems determined to take credit and to shake off conspiracy theorist support. This suggests he is hiding something or taking credit for the work of others to be a great jihadi.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2883801/Marathon-bombing-suspects-lawyers-invoke-McVeigh.html

It is likely that Dzohkar Tsarnaev deeply hates White Christian America and the people.  He didn’t create this hate out of himself by himself.  This is something Chechens feel and they hate us and want to harm us in revenge for the IMF funding of the genocide of Chechens in the 1990s by Russia.  They see us as using them as a pawn and abandoning them to their fate.  They want to make us pay attention to that hurt and feel it ourselves.

They also see us as part of the wider war on Islam and Moslems.  This is a war they believe they can win.  They want us to feel what they felt, helpless in the face of a greater power, Islam.

But we appear to ignore the danger of Islam as well as the dangers of Russia inside our countries.  Russia’s most harmful activities are inside the universities, but the government seems determined to ignore this and bring more Russians and Chinese to make it worse in our universities and the companies that hire them in tech and banking.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and US government Mutual Assured Coverup?

January 25, 2015

Do each of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and the US government have things they want to conceal during the trial?  Does Tsarnaev want to conceal the involvement of others? A wider plots? Follow on targets? The role of Russia?  Protect his family in Russia from reprisals from FSB, Chechens or Moslem radicals?

Does US government want to coverup that NSA was monitoring Chechens and Harvard and MIT professors prior to the Boston Bombing and after Berezovsky’s death?

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev seems determined to take credit for the Boston Bombing.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2883801/Marathon-bombing-suspects-lawyers-invoke-McVeigh.html

Tsarnaev confession

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325524/Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-Boston-bomber-scrawled-F–America-confession-boat.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2314508/Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-confessed-FBI-hospital-bedside-went-silent-read-rights.html

Tsarnaev shows a pattern from the note scrawled in the boat, to the confession to the FBI in hospital to the motion to exclude conspiracy theory types from the courthouse area to take credit for the bombing.

Reasons Tsarnaev may want to take credit.

  1. He is a dedicated jihadi who hates White Christian America and wants to kill as many of us as he can.  He wants to say that and take credit with other jihadis.
  2. There are others involved he wants to protect.
  3. Others did things Tsarnaev wants to take credit for now with the jihadi public to bolster his memory as a jihadi.
  4. He wants to inspire others.
  5. There are people back in Russia he wants to protect from reprisals if he admits information he knows.  This could be of a wider conspiracy or a role by Russia or Moslem groups in Russia.

Does Tsarnaev want to coverup some of the same things the US government wants to coverup? Were they going to target the professors at Harvard and MIT? Or just anyone at Harvard and MIT? Was that a motive in shooting the MIT officer?

Did Tsarnaev know that Russian FSB, SVR had a role in planning the bombing? Did Russian FSB use a front group of Moslems, but the Tsarnaevs knew that?  Or were told it by someone?

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Links to some blogs asking questions about what is government case against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

January 25, 2015

Some links on questions on the Boston Bombing by others.  There is a good chance that there will be no effective defense, and this may be because Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was involved and he wants to take credit for his role.  He may also wish to shield others.

http://my.firedoglake.com/efbeall/tag/baby-blake/

http://my.firedoglake.com/efbeall/2013/11/21/what-would-require-explanation-at-a-tsarnaev-trial/#comments

http://my.firedoglake.com/efbeall/2013/11/06/so-who-did-bomb-the-boston-marathon/

http://my.firedoglake.com/efbeall/2013/11/11/who-bombed-the-boston-marathon-ii-a-hypothesis/

Simulations of a model wearing a backpack with a 30 pound load shows stress wrinkles in the jackets that are not present in the photos of the Tsarnaevs before the bombing.

http://whowhatwhy.org/2013/05/20/official-story-has-odd-wrinkles-a-pack-of-questions-about-the-boston-bombing-backpacks/

http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2013/07/boston-marathon-analysis-of-second-bomb.html

In the event that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev wants to take credit for the crime, the government still has some explaining to do as to how it was done and how the NSA missed what was happening from the time of Berezovsky’s death to the Boston Bombing.  They also should have been monitoring Chechens in Boston because of their blaming IMF loans for funding their genocide.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Boston Bombing trial what evidence public wants to see

January 25, 2015

The public wants to see evidence that proves Dzhokhar Tsarnaev really did plant a backpack bomb at the Boston Marathon. This means eliminating the possibility that he was framed as part of a false flag.  Another alternative is that he was involved but he did not know the full plot and/or that the role of others has not been brought out.

The Boston Bombing was a political event that requires evidence appropriate to a political event.  Political event bombings are staged in one way or another, whether by the Tsarnaevs or someone else.  A patsy is a known concept in such events.

Thus proof in such a political event case requires acknowledging that there are false flags, that the government engages in them, that in political matters, the government lies and to show that this was not the case in the Boston Bombing.

However, the government is in fact covering up parts of this.  After the Boston Bombing, Putin said that Anatoly Chubais was advised by CIA agents, meaning Andrei Shleifer of Harvard, Nicholas Hay now in London and in effect Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer. This was a reversal of the reality, that Chubais was passing on kompromat pressure through Shleifer to Summers and Fischer to get IMF loans for Russia based on Fischer’s plagiarism and Summers’ uncles involvement.

Russia wanted Tamerlan Tsarnaev to do something in Boston in order to push this button.  The Boston Bombing was planned for the Marathon Day on April 15, 2013 in advance, and Berezovsky killed on March 23, 2013 in advance of it. Russia likely knew the plan for the Boston Bombing.  Russia likely passed it to Tamerlan through a front group in Russia while he was there.

All of this is being concealed from the prosecutor and the judge is likely.  This makes the case a bit of a farce.

The NSA was probably recording every phone call of Tsarnaev and their circle and all their emails.  Most of this material has likely not been seen by the prosecutor or the judge.  The judge has not been briefed on the big picture and on this intelligence surveillance by NSA.  All the judge has been told is FBI dropped the case. But NSA likely did not.  NSA has known for years about these matters and likely was monitoring everyone involved, saving their phone conversations and emails.

Since Tamerlan Tsarnaev went to Russia and to Dagestan and Chechnya, traveling through Moscow and the Russians warned about him to the US, the Russia side of it has to be disclosed to the judge and prosecutor so they can understand the context of the case.  This is so the judge can make rulings and also determine how much has to be told the defense counsel.

This structures the evidence of guilt by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as opposed to some false flag that framed him.  In that regard, it appears Israel and Russia killed Berezovsky in March 2013 ahead of the Boston Bombing knowing that it would happen.

Since information was available to the public including the NSA and the British before and after the Berezovsky death and before the Boston Bombing, the NSA was likely monitoring the Boston situation involving these professors closely. The NSA did not likely drop the Tsarnaevs the way the FBI did. So NSA was probably monitoring all communications of the Tsarnaevs from Berezovsky death forward very intensely. That would also include of the contact the Tsarnaevs had in New Hampshire who linked to Chechens in London linked to Berezovsky.

Musa Khadzhimuratov was the Chechen in New Hampshire. Tamerlan Tsarnaev visited him before the Boston Bombing and likely practiced and possibly made pressure cooker bombs.  That is under the official scenario.  However, Musa Khadzhimuratov  may also have been part of a plot to frame Tsarnaev is a logical possibility.  That could be a Russian plot, CIA false flag, Berezovsky from the grave plot, etc.  Those have to be considered in turn and disproven.

If the NSA was monitoring Chechen communications after the death of Berezovsky on March 23, 2013, which seems very likely since Berezovsky had links to the Chechen underworld and they wanted to know what happened to his money, then they probably were monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov  and thus Tsarnaev’s visit to Musa Khadzhimuratov  before the Boston Bombing on April 15, 2013.

Berezovsky giving money to Chechens has been reported since 2002.

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS581US581&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=where%20berezovsky%20money%20went%20chechens

What happened to Berezovsky’s money was at issue in the press at the time of his death, since one explanation is that he committed suicide because his fortune was lost from the prior year case with Abramovich.  So this was known to the public. The NSA must have read these stories and talked to the British and been monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov  in New Hampshire to try to learn more about where Berezovsky’s money went to.

All of this is probably concealed from the judge, the prosecutor and possibly still the FBI team assigned to the case.  This means the FBI investigators and prosecutors were shut out of critical government information during the investigation and preparation of charges.  Then the judge was deceived as to the existence of this information.  That means the judge can’t make evidence rulings or determine what information the defense has to be told.

The defense should have been told before trial that NSA was monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov as part of the group of Chechens being monitored after the Berezovsky death and to locate his funds.

Long article on Musa Khadzhimuratov and FBI investigation of him here:

http://seattletimes.com/text/2021001697.html

Musa khadzhimuratov bodyguard Akhmed Zakayev

March 25 2013:

“How Dead Oligarch Boris Berezovsky Impoverished Himself Fighting Putin And Losing A Lawsuit Against His Old Friend”

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/how-boris-berezovsky-lost-his-fortune-2013-3#ixzz3Ppnpzxsl

This was before Boston Bombing, so NSA could have been searching for Berezovsky’s money and that would include monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov and Akhmed Zakayev communications if any and other Chechens between the death of Berezovsky in March 2013 and the Boston Bombing.

What did NSA know and when did it know it?  This is the famous Watergate question of Senator Howard Baker.

Andrei Shleifer prior to the Boston Bombing wrote about the likely future failures of the FBI and NSA dealing with Russia and Chechens and posted it on his Harvard webpage.  Did the NSA not know of that?  Didn’t they monitor everyone involved closely?

Chechens Shleifer site:Harvard.edu

March 25, 2013

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298571/Why-Boris-Berezovsky-billionaire-Rasputin-life.html

To protect his fortune, Berezovsky forged ties with Chechen gangsters – some of the most feared people in Russia. The graveyards of Russia are full of dead businessmen from the 1990s, and Berezovsky almost joined them: he faced a gun battle in central Moscow in 1994, and a year later the Mercedes he was in was blown up, decapitating his driver.

Rewarded with a seat on Yeltsin’s national Security Council, he helped implement the peace deal that ended Russia’s first war with rebels in the Chechnya region, and was seen as a figure of almost Rasputin-like influence.

So the Berezovsky Chechen connection was well known to NSA. Berezovsky’s death in March 2013 should then have intensified their monitoring of Chechens in the US linked to Chechens in the UK or Russia. That would include Musa Khadzhimuratov in New Hampshire and Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

This is the context to approaching NSA surveillance of Musa Khadzhimuratov and Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dhzokarh Tsarnaev between the death of Berezovsky March 23 2013 and the Boston Bombing on April 15, 2013.

Given such interest by NSA, Russian FSB, Chechen gangs, and so on, the question of who knew what and who was in on what before the Boston Bombing is a basic part of the case.  Berezvosky was likely killed by Russia and Israel as part of a plot to remove him so they could advance Stanley Fischer at the Federal Reserve, possibly even as chairman.  Fischer resigned unexpectedly as Israel’s central banker in January 2013 a week after I asked MIT to investigate him for plagiarism and Russia using that as kompromat to get IMF loans.

So where was the NSA in all of this?  Fischer resigning in January 2013 should have alerted them to monitor Berezovsky since it was public information that Berezovsky had pressured Fischer over kompromat over his plagiarism. Moreover, NSA presumably got copies of my emails to MIT in January 2013 asking them to investigate Fischer the week before Fischer resigned unexpectedly.

Stanley Fischer resigns Israel 

So NSA had a lot of information in the press to focus them on Stanley Fischer, Berezovsky, Chechens, missing billions, connections to Chechen muscle men and separtists and terrorists.  They should have know the Chechens blamed the IMF loans under Stanley Fischer for funding the Second Chechen War.  They should have known that Russia tried to blame the CIA for the Moscow Apartment Bombings, and that Russia killed Dzhokhar Dudayev in 1996 on the same day Clinton was in Russia with Yeltstin and that Strobe Talbott reported in his book that Clinton congratulated Yeltsin on the kill. Moreover, the FSB had planted the rumor the CIA gave them the location information on Dudayev when he was killed.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev trip to Russia has been compared to Lee Harvey Oswald.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/24/the-brothers-tsarnaev-the-lee-harvey-oswalds-of-the-boston-bombings/

CIA still won’t release LHO related files.  So they should have known that Tamerlan Tsarnaev could be part of some Russian false flag.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/29/cia-financing-of-chechen-and-other-caucasus-regional-terrorists/

Uncle Ruslan was probably a CIA asset.

Then there was the professor Brian Glyn Williams.

Tsarnaev professor Brian Glyn Williams

The Welsh feel a link to Chechens as mutual victims of occupation.  The Welsh have been taking the side of the Chechens since the 1990s.  They seem to edit Wikipedia pages related to the Chechens such as for Dudayev, going by memory.

Did the CIA and NSA really drop the ball on these links at this time, after Berezovsky’s death and Fischer’s resignation?They were recording everything at the time and that likely included full phone conversations and emails for this group.

Wasn’t NSA monitoring these people including the Chechens in the US?  Has most of this been kept from the FBI investigators in the Boston Bombing case? From the prosecutor? From the judge? From the defense lawyer?  Congress? The public?

This is like 911 and the Kennedy Assassination. We only get a fraction of an investigation.  Most of the investigators are kept in the dark most of the time of the investigation.

What really happened on April 15, 2013?  There were a lot of private security types or government security types practicing we are told.  But who did they work for?  Did some of them know some of the above?  Who was in position to take advantage of this information and nexus of events?

Why did Putin jump in after the Boston Bombing saying Anatoly Chubais was advised by CIA agents, meaning Shleifer, Hay, Summers, Fischer?  Russia blamed the CIA for the Moscow Apartment Bombings with the Chechens.  NSA must have known that. What did Putin know?

Russia in May 2013 outed a CIA agent and the CIA station chief in Moscow to emphasize the CIA connection to Chechens?Was this planned already before the Boston Bombing?

How is there a fair trial with all this still hanging as far as the public and most likely the FBI, prosecutor and judge are concerned?  It makes the Tsarnaev trial a farce.

There can’t be a fair trial because there still hasn’t been an investigation. If the people investigating the bombing itself and the shooting of the MIT police officer knew all of this, they would have asked different questions and investigated false flag leads. This information was concealed from them. The MIT connection to IMF loans, Berezovsky, Chechens was likely concealed from most of the investigators of that shooting.  So there was not really a proper investigation with the NSA CIA part of the government concealing critical information from the investigators.

So what really happened? Who did the bombing? Who prepared the bombs where? What color backpack were they in? Could they fit in the Tsarnaev backpacks? Did anyone see them plant the bombs? Did they still have their backpacks later? Were they recovered?  Who knew these things as they were happening?  Who was on the scene for other parts of the government?  What government employees were where at what time in these events? What did they know? Non-government employees?

Even if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was involved, that does not exclude others. Nor does Dzhokhar Tsarnaev know everything. The public wants to understand the full picture and setting which includes the above issues. What did the NSA know and what was it doing during all this?

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

Frontline Putin’s Way and what should be our way?

January 16, 2015

PBS Frontline had a documentary on Vladimir Putin and his rise to power and how he has used it.  It is called Putin’s Way. It has many interesting interview snippets.  Some of them apparently by people still in Russia speaking frankly.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/putins-way/

Basically Putin’s Way is as follows. Putin left the KGB and became the Rahm Emanuel for Anatoly Sobchak the mayor of St. Petersburg.  Putin controlled access to offices and permits for Western business and used that in a sort of food for licenses program. However, the food part ended up being money in foreign bank accounts for Sobchak, Putin, etc.

Putin then was seen by Yeltsin as someone to protect him in retirement.  This is because Putin had  been loyal to Sobchak when Sobchak was investigated.  Actually it was Berezovsky who promoted Putin and Berezovsky who was the power behind the Yeltsin throne.

Putin engineered apartment bombings in 1999 to fuel a second Chechen war.  This was a genocide as far as Chechens were concerned.

Left out was how Russia used academic kompromat and likely spying kompromat on Stanley Fischer and Larry Summers to get IMF loans and the role of Andrei Shleifer, Anatoly Chubais, etc.  This was a Berezovsky operation and the key to his power, because he as an academic knew this history and used it in the 1990s.

Putin used the 2nd Chechen War to get elected president of Russia.  Once president, Putin publicly taunted Stanley Fischer to take credit for the IMF loans that funded the Berezovsky Yeltsin corruption in the 1990s.

The Frontline concentrates on Khodorkovsky instead of Berezovsky as representing the oligarchs.  This is inaccurate.  Berezovsky was killed in 2013 most likely by a joint agreement between Israel and Russia.  Perhaps this is why PBS did a special on Putin’s rise without ever mentioning Berezovsky.  Having Khodorkovsy as the representative oligarch is a fiction and intentionally is meant to fill the hole of avoiding Berezovsky.  Many viewers will think that Khodorkovsky was the person behind corruption in the 1990s and he got Yukos Oil out of it.

Frontline takes elements of conflict between Khodorkovsky and Putin and makes the uninformed viewer think that Khodorovsky was a sort of “young reformer” taking on Putin.  This is almost agitprop and part of their distraction op from Putin working with Israel to kill Berezvosky in 2013.

Frontline does acknowledge MH17 being shot down as having a critical effect on the West’s relation to Russia. However, they ignore the context of Russia blaming the CIA for everything from the 1990s on. That included linking the CIA to killing Dzokhar Dudayev in 1996 while Clinton was in Russia, blaming the CIA for the Moscow Apartment bombings and saying that Shleifer was a CIA agent (in response to this webpage?) having exposed the academic kompromat used to get the IMF loans.

Ignored was Renova Group likely holding part of Putin’s money in Switzerland and that Alexander Zyurikov watches over Viktor Vekselberg and is also involved in Russian private security company Mongoose which is all over Central Asia and Ukraine.

So now Putin shows us he is willing to kill Westerners and to kill inside our own countries.  He in some way sponsored the Boston Bombing involving Tamerlan Tsarnaev probably through a front group in Dagestan and Chechnya that planned it when Tamerlan visited Russia.

Putin tells the story of how he confronted a rat as a boy and cornered it and the rat apparently jumped out of the corner surprising Putin.  This is left as the message of the documentary.  They say Putin fears prosecution if he leaves the presidency of Russia and so he is invading Ukraine to repeat the method of the 2nd Chechen War to stay in power.  So the message of the documentary is leave Putin alone?

Who did the documentary?  It is almost like Putin did it in order to tell the US to back off Russia. This is very strange.  It leaves out Berezovsky’s death and likely killing by Russia and Israel in a joint pact in 2013.  It leaves out this is to cover up for Stanley Fischer and Obama.  So it is like Russia, Israel and Obama put this documentary together to tell us to back off Russia.

Also left out is that MH370 may have been taken by Russia as indicated in The Spoof by Jeff Wise. The spoof is that they spoofed Inmarsat to think MH370 flew south when it flew north by using a device programmed to send out deceptive signals.

http://jeffwise.net/2014/11/07/mh370-evidence-points-to-sophisticated-hijackers/

http://jeffwise.net/the-spoof-part-1-why-a-speculative-scenario/

Putin has a sophisticated plan in place over several years to advance his interests.  This reflects the weakness of Obama as an opportunity. Frontline did mention that.  But that Stanley Fischer gives Putin even more leverage was not.  Nor that Putin has executed a plan step by step including a media campaign such as Boston Bombing, Snowden Saga, MH370 disappearing possibly, MH17, etc.

Putin is presented as a passive person in Putin’s Way in the current situation. Poor Putin he is just a pooch caught in the storm. Let’s take him in.  But actually, Putin has a plan that he is executing and he thinks it is succeeding.

So we can follow the message of this documentary and back off Putin and lift or moderate sanctions and accept whatever he does, or we can think about having our own plan.  Any plan to convince Putin we are serious has to involve exposing Stanley Fischer, Larry Summers, Andrei Shleifer, and likely presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama as involved in covering this up.  That likely includes the attorney generals and also likely heads of the FBI as part of the conspiracy.

If Putin thinks the FBI heads and AGs are involved in covering up Russia’s kompromat to get IMF loans in the 1990s, then he thinks he has the US contained if not controlled.  In that case, he will continue to expand Russia and gain popularity that way.

Germany has been corrupted by Russia. Frontline admits that in the case of former Chancellor Schroeder.  However, this appears to be deeper in Germany and widespread. Renova Group’s Josef Ackermann and Peter Loescher seem to be part of this.

Frontline also said that Russia has corrupted the UK through oligarch money in London.  This was quite bold for them.  Russia needed to payoff the UK to neutralize MI5 and to cover up for Berezovsky. Eventually, Russia killed Berezovsky inside the UK with Israel’s help.  MI5 has gone along with the suicide idea.  No doubt this was ordered by Cameron.

The CIA, FBI and DOJ in the US are also covering up.  So Putin feels he has a free ride from the Anglo Powers, US and UK. No wonder the PM of Australia was so frustrated with the inaction over Putin.

There is no leverage possibly on Putin as long as he thinks he has MI5, CIA, FBI and DOJ under his thumb and covering up for him in order to cover up for their political bosses.

So the West is a fractured alliance which Russian intelligence has co-opted and turned and which has been bribed by oligarch money into being a partner with Putin not his adversary.  To Putin, the West is pretending to oppose him because it keeps covering up Russia’s actions such as the IMF loans caper with Stanley Fischer now installed as vice chairman of the Fed after Russia and Israel killed Berezovsky to make it possible.

Putin is not fearing his retirement as the Frontline documentary tells us, Putin feels he is one of the great men of history. He has neutralized and co-opted the West and made it his partner by bribes, networking and kompromat.  He can rebuild the Russian Soviet empire.  He is a man of destiny.  He is not a worm fearing his own death as Frontline makes out. He strides the earth as a 21st century colossus and uses the Russian intel service to neutralize and coopt his enemies.

Putin feels he can seize the moment and make Russia great.  Putin will die in his bed in the Kremlin of old age as the beloved man who restored Russia’s greatness. This in a world where Moslem terrorists can freely invade the West and kill people and destroy buildings at their whim.  Russia is being protected from what happens in Paris and New York happening in Moscow.  Putin does that.  Putin the Great does that.

Until we expose Russia’s intel operations, networks and the corruption of our political leaders and the MI5, FBI, DOJ going along with it, nothing will push Putin off this path. He won’t believe that any US or European initiative is anything but window dressing on a corrupt West that he has the files on.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: