Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Boston Bombing trial what evidence public wants to see

January 25, 2015

The public wants to see evidence that proves Dzhokhar Tsarnaev really did plant a backpack bomb at the Boston Marathon. This means eliminating the possibility that he was framed as part of a false flag.  Another alternative is that he was involved but he did not know the full plot and/or that the role of others has not been brought out.

The Boston Bombing was a political event that requires evidence appropriate to a political event.  Political event bombings are staged in one way or another, whether by the Tsarnaevs or someone else.  A patsy is a known concept in such events.

Thus proof in such a political event case requires acknowledging that there are false flags, that the government engages in them, that in political matters, the government lies and to show that this was not the case in the Boston Bombing.

However, the government is in fact covering up parts of this.  After the Boston Bombing, Putin said that Anatoly Chubais was advised by CIA agents, meaning Andrei Shleifer of Harvard, Nicholas Hay now in London and in effect Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer. This was a reversal of the reality, that Chubais was passing on kompromat pressure through Shleifer to Summers and Fischer to get IMF loans for Russia based on Fischer’s plagiarism and Summers’ uncles involvement.

Russia wanted Tamerlan Tsarnaev to do something in Boston in order to push this button.  The Boston Bombing was planned for the Marathon Day on April 15, 2013 in advance, and Berezovsky killed on March 23, 2013 in advance of it. Russia likely knew the plan for the Boston Bombing.  Russia likely passed it to Tamerlan through a front group in Russia while he was there.

All of this is being concealed from the prosecutor and the judge is likely.  This makes the case a bit of a farce.

The NSA was probably recording every phone call of Tsarnaev and their circle and all their emails.  Most of this material has likely not been seen by the prosecutor or the judge.  The judge has not been briefed on the big picture and on this intelligence surveillance by NSA.  All the judge has been told is FBI dropped the case. But NSA likely did not.  NSA has known for years about these matters and likely was monitoring everyone involved, saving their phone conversations and emails.

Since Tamerlan Tsarnaev went to Russia and to Dagestan and Chechnya, traveling through Moscow and the Russians warned about him to the US, the Russia side of it has to be disclosed to the judge and prosecutor so they can understand the context of the case.  This is so the judge can make rulings and also determine how much has to be told the defense counsel.

This structures the evidence of guilt by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as opposed to some false flag that framed him.  In that regard, it appears Israel and Russia killed Berezovsky in March 2013 ahead of the Boston Bombing knowing that it would happen.

Since information was available to the public including the NSA and the British before and after the Berezovsky death and before the Boston Bombing, the NSA was likely monitoring the Boston situation involving these professors closely. The NSA did not likely drop the Tsarnaevs the way the FBI did. So NSA was probably monitoring all communications of the Tsarnaevs from Berezovsky death forward very intensely. That would also include of the contact the Tsarnaevs had in New Hampshire who linked to Chechens in London linked to Berezovsky.

Musa Khadzhimuratov was the Chechen in New Hampshire. Tamerlan Tsarnaev visited him before the Boston Bombing and likely practiced and possibly made pressure cooker bombs.  That is under the official scenario.  However, Musa Khadzhimuratov  may also have been part of a plot to frame Tsarnaev is a logical possibility.  That could be a Russian plot, CIA false flag, Berezovsky from the grave plot, etc.  Those have to be considered in turn and disproven.

If the NSA was monitoring Chechen communications after the death of Berezovsky on March 23, 2013, which seems very likely since Berezovsky had links to the Chechen underworld and they wanted to know what happened to his money, then they probably were monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov  and thus Tsarnaev’s visit to Musa Khadzhimuratov  before the Boston Bombing on April 15, 2013.

Berezovsky giving money to Chechens has been reported since 2002.

What happened to Berezovsky’s money was at issue in the press at the time of his death, since one explanation is that he committed suicide because his fortune was lost from the prior year case with Abramovich.  So this was known to the public. The NSA must have read these stories and talked to the British and been monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov  in New Hampshire to try to learn more about where Berezovsky’s money went to.

All of this is probably concealed from the judge, the prosecutor and possibly still the FBI team assigned to the case.  This means the FBI investigators and prosecutors were shut out of critical government information during the investigation and preparation of charges.  Then the judge was deceived as to the existence of this information.  That means the judge can’t make evidence rulings or determine what information the defense has to be told.

The defense should have been told before trial that NSA was monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov as part of the group of Chechens being monitored after the Berezovsky death and to locate his funds.

Long article on Musa Khadzhimuratov and FBI investigation of him here:

Musa khadzhimuratov bodyguard Akhmed Zakayev

March 25 2013:

“How Dead Oligarch Boris Berezovsky Impoverished Himself Fighting Putin And Losing A Lawsuit Against His Old Friend”

Read more:

This was before Boston Bombing, so NSA could have been searching for Berezovsky’s money and that would include monitoring Musa Khadzhimuratov and Akhmed Zakayev communications if any and other Chechens between the death of Berezovsky in March 2013 and the Boston Bombing.

What did NSA know and when did it know it?  This is the famous Watergate question of Senator Howard Baker.

Andrei Shleifer prior to the Boston Bombing wrote about the likely future failures of the FBI and NSA dealing with Russia and Chechens and posted it on his Harvard webpage.  Did the NSA not know of that?  Didn’t they monitor everyone involved closely?

Chechens Shleifer

March 25, 2013

To protect his fortune, Berezovsky forged ties with Chechen gangsters – some of the most feared people in Russia. The graveyards of Russia are full of dead businessmen from the 1990s, and Berezovsky almost joined them: he faced a gun battle in central Moscow in 1994, and a year later the Mercedes he was in was blown up, decapitating his driver.

Rewarded with a seat on Yeltsin’s national Security Council, he helped implement the peace deal that ended Russia’s first war with rebels in the Chechnya region, and was seen as a figure of almost Rasputin-like influence.

So the Berezovsky Chechen connection was well known to NSA. Berezovsky’s death in March 2013 should then have intensified their monitoring of Chechens in the US linked to Chechens in the UK or Russia. That would include Musa Khadzhimuratov in New Hampshire and Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

This is the context to approaching NSA surveillance of Musa Khadzhimuratov and Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dhzokarh Tsarnaev between the death of Berezovsky March 23 2013 and the Boston Bombing on April 15, 2013.

Given such interest by NSA, Russian FSB, Chechen gangs, and so on, the question of who knew what and who was in on what before the Boston Bombing is a basic part of the case.  Berezvosky was likely killed by Russia and Israel as part of a plot to remove him so they could advance Stanley Fischer at the Federal Reserve, possibly even as chairman.  Fischer resigned unexpectedly as Israel’s central banker in January 2013 a week after I asked MIT to investigate him for plagiarism and Russia using that as kompromat to get IMF loans.

So where was the NSA in all of this?  Fischer resigning in January 2013 should have alerted them to monitor Berezovsky since it was public information that Berezovsky had pressured Fischer over kompromat over his plagiarism. Moreover, NSA presumably got copies of my emails to MIT in January 2013 asking them to investigate Fischer the week before Fischer resigned unexpectedly.

Stanley Fischer resigns Israel 

So NSA had a lot of information in the press to focus them on Stanley Fischer, Berezovsky, Chechens, missing billions, connections to Chechen muscle men and separtists and terrorists.  They should have know the Chechens blamed the IMF loans under Stanley Fischer for funding the Second Chechen War.  They should have known that Russia tried to blame the CIA for the Moscow Apartment Bombings, and that Russia killed Dzhokhar Dudayev in 1996 on the same day Clinton was in Russia with Yeltstin and that Strobe Talbott reported in his book that Clinton congratulated Yeltsin on the kill. Moreover, the FSB had planted the rumor the CIA gave them the location information on Dudayev when he was killed.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev trip to Russia has been compared to Lee Harvey Oswald.

CIA still won’t release LHO related files.  So they should have known that Tamerlan Tsarnaev could be part of some Russian false flag.

Uncle Ruslan was probably a CIA asset.

Then there was the professor Brian Glyn Williams.

Tsarnaev professor Brian Glyn Williams

The Welsh feel a link to Chechens as mutual victims of occupation.  The Welsh have been taking the side of the Chechens since the 1990s.  They seem to edit Wikipedia pages related to the Chechens such as for Dudayev, going by memory.

Did the CIA and NSA really drop the ball on these links at this time, after Berezovsky’s death and Fischer’s resignation?They were recording everything at the time and that likely included full phone conversations and emails for this group.

Wasn’t NSA monitoring these people including the Chechens in the US?  Has most of this been kept from the FBI investigators in the Boston Bombing case? From the prosecutor? From the judge? From the defense lawyer?  Congress? The public?

This is like 911 and the Kennedy Assassination. We only get a fraction of an investigation.  Most of the investigators are kept in the dark most of the time of the investigation.

What really happened on April 15, 2013?  There were a lot of private security types or government security types practicing we are told.  But who did they work for?  Did some of them know some of the above?  Who was in position to take advantage of this information and nexus of events?

Why did Putin jump in after the Boston Bombing saying Anatoly Chubais was advised by CIA agents, meaning Shleifer, Hay, Summers, Fischer?  Russia blamed the CIA for the Moscow Apartment Bombings with the Chechens.  NSA must have known that. What did Putin know?

Russia in May 2013 outed a CIA agent and the CIA station chief in Moscow to emphasize the CIA connection to Chechens?Was this planned already before the Boston Bombing?

How is there a fair trial with all this still hanging as far as the public and most likely the FBI, prosecutor and judge are concerned?  It makes the Tsarnaev trial a farce.

There can’t be a fair trial because there still hasn’t been an investigation. If the people investigating the bombing itself and the shooting of the MIT police officer knew all of this, they would have asked different questions and investigated false flag leads. This information was concealed from them. The MIT connection to IMF loans, Berezovsky, Chechens was likely concealed from most of the investigators of that shooting.  So there was not really a proper investigation with the NSA CIA part of the government concealing critical information from the investigators.

So what really happened? Who did the bombing? Who prepared the bombs where? What color backpack were they in? Could they fit in the Tsarnaev backpacks? Did anyone see them plant the bombs? Did they still have their backpacks later? Were they recovered?  Who knew these things as they were happening?  Who was on the scene for other parts of the government?  What government employees were where at what time in these events? What did they know? Non-government employees?

Even if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was involved, that does not exclude others. Nor does Dzhokhar Tsarnaev know everything. The public wants to understand the full picture and setting which includes the above issues. What did the NSA know and what was it doing during all this?

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: