Archive for the '011 British' Category

Queen Victoria Up Diamond Jubilee Queen Elizabeth II Down Down Jubilee

June 5, 2012

Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee was 1897.  The previous 60 years saw a great updraft of the British People world wide.  From 1837 to 1897 was a period of great progress, only marred by the American Civil War and the upsurge of Ellis Island Diversity in America.

The Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee of 2012 marks 60 years of retreat and ethnic cleansing of the British Race in England, America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.  The 5 homelands of the British Race are under assault and are turning into diversity colonies.

These two jubilees are the updraft and the downdraft of the British Race.


English blogs against the English song Roots by Show of Hands

October 30, 2010

Here is Fitroy against the victory of the English over the Spanish Armada and calls the Spanish the victims of the English.

The Spanish formed a fleet and set out to invade and conquer England and the Spanish are the victims when they lose in his view. “This House won’t fight for King and Country.” Nor the Church of England too.

One author writes for establishment media and so can’t afford to offend them. The other may have that situation or that aspiration.

The measure of their intense dislike of Roots by Show of Hands and the English who like it and the BNP may be their own measure of dependence on the establishment that is race replacing the English.

After reading their contempt for the English who like this song, one might consider the Bible:

Bible, Matthew 7:2:

For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

The King James Bible and Shakespeare they are allowed to favor still by the establishment that has not completely eliminated them for bigotry and racism.

We know that Enoch Powell would enjoy Roots for the truth of what it says.

Roots Show of Hands:

We have had to save the English two times in the last 100 years. This time we will have to fight in the fields and in the cities to eject the invaders. But their total defeat is assured, because we are the branch and roots of The English People. We are The Founding Stock Americans and we are the head stock and natural leaders of The Confederacy of the White Race. When we stand together we can not be defeated despite all the envy of less happier lands. We are coming. The Yanks are Coming and the Muslims are leaving. God’s Will be Done.

Over There George M. Cohan The Yanks are Coming

Johnny, get your gun, get your gun, get your gun,
Johnny, show the “Mus”[3] you’re a son-of-a-gun.
Hoist the flag and let her fly.
Yankee Doodle[4] do or die.
Pack your little kit, show your grit, do your bit.
Yankee[5] to the ranks from the towns and the tanks.[6]
Make your Mother proud of you
And the old red-white-and-blue[7]


Over there, over there,
Send the word, send the word over there
That the Yanks are coming, the Yanks are coming
The drums rum-tumming everywhere.
So prepare, say a prayer,
Send the word, send the word to beware –
We’ll be over, we’re coming over,
And we won’t come back till it’s over, over there.

When The English People stand together we have never been defeated. This is why we are the main enemy of those who seek to destroy the West and plunge us into the rule of darkness and misery. The English People shall rise again in a new birth of freedom and greatness that shall be a New City on a Hill that shall be a light to mankind in the future as it has in the past.

BNP + Red White Blue Festival 2009 = Jerusalem

English Pride World Wide. The sun never sets on English Pride.

America, Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand.

When we stand together, we have never been defeated.

Obama natural born citizen v natural born subject

August 7, 2009

Leo Donofrio at Natural Born Citizen shows that US legal decisions hold that Obama is a natural born subject of the British crown from birth.  This seeming tie is resolved by looking at original intent and by fact according to the argument below.  We can look to Obama’s actual behavior in fact to see if he exhibits loyalties and entanglements in Kenya and resentments of Britain hostile to the US alliance to Britain from the colonial history of Kenya and Britain.  We in fact find that.  Obama resents Britain’s colonial past and applies that to whites and then acts to harm our link to Britain.

Natural Born Citizen v Natural Born Subject.

Tiebreaker:  Original intent is avoid entanglement.

Entanglement in Fact: Obama went to Kenya and was part of Kenya politics in the 2000’s with Odinga, cousin or not.  Obama also dissed the British after becoming president and excluded them at Normandy from some celebration, sent back the Churchill bust, and gave them cheesy insulting gifts.  He also wouldn’t have dinner with Sarkozy on that trip.  France and Britain are our oldest allies and its British law itself we are citing.  We are using our colonial relation to Britain to interpret our laws.  But Obama resents Britain’s colonial relation to Kenya and applies that resentment to disrupt the very tie of Britain to America we are using to interpret our laws.  Obama is not just entangled in Kenya but in a way to want to disrupt our relation with Britain out of his resentments over Kenya being a colony of Britain.  This shows he puts Kenya first.

Where the feared entanglement is shown by the actual conduct of the candidate in question, the tie is resolved that Obama exhibits in fact the divided loyalty feared.  The NBC clause in the Constitution is intended to achieve the result of avoiding entanglement.  Substance over form means the tie is broken that Obama is not NBC because he exhibits the entanglement and divided loyalty and even hostile loyalty that is the original intent to avoid.  Resolution is that Obama is not NBC in fact and is thus not eligible to be US president in fact.


Americans exhibit behavior: Because we were Britain’s colony, we apply her laws and concepts.  Those are us.

Obama’s behavior:  Because Kenya was Britain’s colony, he hates and resents Britain.  Obama is showing he does not identify with Britain but hates it. Thus Obama shows he is not us.

By showing his behavior that he is not us, Obama shows he is not a natural born citizen.


Americans identify with Britain and British because we are the same stock as them and the same people.

Obama resents Kenya being a colony of Britain because Obama considers Kenyans and British as separate and different people.  Obama considers British colonialism was racism because whites and blacks are different peoples and Obama identifies himself as black.  We consider British colonialism was not racism, because we consider we are the Colonists.  The Constitution was written by the Colonists upon becoming independent.

NBC is about people who are us transmitting us-ness.  This is particularly so in Article II which is about having a Commander in Chief CINC who is us. The original intent was to avoid a CINC who didn’t identify as us but identified with some other country or some other people.

Obama identifies with Kenyans as who he is us.  For Obama, “us” means Kenyan.  Obama is black because of his Kenyan father alone.  Obama identifies with black nationalism becuase of his Kenyan father.  That is the identification the Founders wanted to avoid in a CINC.

Obama even resents us because of what “we” did to “him” and “his” by “our” colonizing Kenya.  For Obama, Kenyans are blacks and are “us”, and we are whites and are “them”.   We are the same as the British because we are white and from British stock.  So he resents us and doesn’t identify with us.  This is what the Founders wanted to avoid in a CINC.


When Obama thinks of the relation of Kenya to Britain, Obama thinks of himself as Kenyan
and British as them.  When Obama thinks of Britain by itself, he reverts to this point of view, his resentment as a Kenyan of the British for colonizing his people, the Kenyans.

For us, Britain is the mother country. We show that by interpreting our laws and our Constitution based on British Common Law for centuries past.  We are them.  They are us.

Obama does not think of Britain as the mother country.  Obama thinks of Britain as a hostile colonizing power trying to rule his people, the Kenyans.   This despite being educated at Harvard Law School and teaching Constitutional Law at University of Chicago.

Despite all that, Obama identifies with Kenya as us and Britain as them.  This is not what the president of the US, or CINC, is supposed to feel.  Our courts are applying British law on natural born because they identify us with Britain as our mother country.  We are them.   To Obama, they are the enemy.  That makes us the enemy.  Obama shows that by his black nationalism.

To Obama, his black nationalism in Chicago for 20 years and Kenya’s struggle to throw off British colonialism, are the same thing.  That makes Obama not us and so he can’t be CINC.  The Constitution intends only someone who identifies as us can be CINC.  That rules out someone who identifies Kenyans as us and identifies white Americans as the same as the British and as Obama’s enemies who were tossed out of Kenya.


The Left sometimes admits this is part of why they resent this whole discussion or fear it.  They also sometimes celebrate Obama as not being us, white America especially British Americans who are the Founding Stock Americans who they equate with racism for black slavery.  The Left admits at times and celebrates at times that Obama is not us and does not have an identify of being an American in the sense of the Founding Stock who wrote the Constitution and created the country.  That is an identity the Left hates and denies. They deny the Founding Stock created America and that ultimately denies the identity of America as created out of being a British colony and as ultimately British in origin and identity.  They deny America has a British identity or white identity.


UK Daily Telegraph falsely asserts Unabomber McVeigh racist

July 15, 2009

By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent
Published: 4:49PM BST 15 Jul 2009

Neil Lewington is the man whose life fell apart.

“He was obsessed with other racist attackers such as London nail bomber David Copeland, America’s Unabomber and Oklahoma bomber Timothy McVeigh.”

The didn’t refer to the Unabomber’s name because it was too much trouble to cut and paste it from Wikipedia?

“He decided to start a bombing campaign after watching the wilderness around his home get destroyed by development.[1] From 1978 to 1995, Kaczynski sent 16 bombs to targets including universities and airlines, killing three people and injuring 23. Kaczynski sent a letter to The New York Times on April 24, 1995 and promised “to desist from terrorism” if the Times or The Washington Post published his manifesto. In his Industrial Society and Its Future (also called the “Unabomber Manifesto”), he argued that his bombings were extreme but necessary to attract attention to the erosion of human freedom necessitated by modern technologies requiring large-scale organization.”

Sounds racist eh?

McVeigh claimed that the bombing was revenge for “what the U.S. government did at Waco and Ruby Ridge.”[83] McVeigh visited Waco during the standoff, where he spoke to a news reporter about his anger over what was happening there.[8]

McVeigh frequently quoted and alluded to the white supremacist novel The Turner Diaries. It described acts of terrorism similar to the one he carried out. While McVeigh openly rejected the book’s racism (a roommate said that McVeigh was not a racist and was basically indifferent to racist matters),[84] he claimed to appreciate its interest in firearms. Photocopies of pages sixty-one and sixty-two of The Turner Diaries were found in an envelope inside McVeigh’s car. These pages depicted a fictitious mortar attack upon the U.S. Capitol in Washington.[85]”

McVeigh did it on the anniversary of Lexington so that makes him racist? The British elite now think the American Revolution was racist?  That’s why they have the word American in the title?

Duncan Gardham of the Telegraph and his editors likely think all Americans are racists, ergo the Unabomber whatever his name is, too much trouble to check Wikipedia, and Timothy McVeigh were racists.  All American whites are racist and all their killings racist in their minds.  Even George Religion of Peace Bush was a racist to invade Iraq.  Why?  He was American.  Just to be double sure, he is from Texas.   Must have Confederate flags in his room and Swastikas on the bottom of his boots.  No wonder he had to get back to his ranch.

What makes Neil Lewington a white supremacist?  Didn’t like immigration? Was arrested?  Hard luck in life?  The Telegraph actually celebrates that he wasn’t able to get a good job but was being beaten down by the bad job market created by immigration.  The journalists and editors at the Telegraph feel this proves they are right to have no loyalty to the British people and that David Cameron is right to feel no loyalty.

Neil Lewington is a white supremacist out of work failure carrying bombs.  Therefore genocide of the British people is justified.  But why was he in this situation?  Have anything to do with immigration at genocidal levels?

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

What the theorem says is that the genocide is a certainty for everyone on the island.  That includes sneering Daily Telegraph journalists who look down their noses at whites who are being destroyed by their policies.

Sean O’Neill, Crime and Security Editor

A white supremacist who plotted to ignite racial violence by bombing people he regarded as “non-British” has been found guilty of terrorism and explosives offences.”

“”From time to time threats emerge from right wing extremists who are intent on undermining community cohesion in London and elsewhere in the UK,” said Deputy Assistant Commissioner John McDowall, head of the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command.”

“Community Cohesion”?

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Is that what community cohesion means?   What about non-British?  Would the alleles that replace the alleles formerly known as British be non-British?  Or are alleles British by virtue of being issued a British passport?

How many people born in Britian are descended from British?  This is a trick exam question.  Its 100 percent of course.  The official answer.  Be sure to remember it if you apply for citizenship or are tested for white supremacy for pre-detention for mental illness.

Adil Khan ‘nowhere to hide’ genocide British stock

July 12, 2009

“Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police”

“”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

(Note his address to “you”.  Whom is he talking to?  British people?  White people, British and American?  More on this later.)

Khan if we could only hear you now:–I-Spit-My-Last-Breath-at-TheeWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Ricardo-Montalban-is-the-Man-

Patrick Cleburne updates us on the sentences of the two bloggers prosecuted for hate speech in the UK.  Their sentences were long and harsh.

Also see Nicholas Stix

“Simon Sheppard, 51, of Selby in North Yorkshire, received four years and 10 months, and Stephen Whittle, 42, of Preston, two years and four months.”

Kirk: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”  For the heretical two now sentenced to long terms in prison this quote fits.   To fight for your freedom and the survival of your race is the greatest thing we can do.  Now these two are in prison for having fought for our freedom.  The quote is from Tale of Two Cities and refers to the French Revolution.  We are in such a time of revolution now.  We are fighting for our freedom and our survival yet again.

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.
Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
English novelist (1812 – 1870)–It-Was-the-Best-of-TimesWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-

“That, said Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police, makes their conviction a first.”

“I’ve done far worse than kill you. I’ve hurt you. And, I wish to go on hurting you. I shall leave you as you left me–as you left her–marooned, for all eternity, in the center of a dead planet: buried alive.”

Adil Khan has done something far worse than kill the two bloggers, if he could have, he has killed British Justice.  That was something uncommon although it was called the Common Law.  But British Justice is something Adil Khan and his country didn’t invent and don’t have.

They only had it when the British ruled there and only where the British ruled and when the British ruled.  Since then its back to Islamic Law, which is what the two bloggers were practically imprisoned under.  They were imprisoned under the law of Adil Khan.  Khan is the law and they are his prisoners.

Take away the British, the real ethnic British, and leave Khan’s lot in charge and you lose British Justice straight away.  Faster than you can say Sheppard and Whittle.

Adil Khan is put over British, ethnic British, as part of their ethnic cleansing.

Judge Rodney Grant “which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.”

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

Adil Khan is one of the colonizing oppressor’s own nationals.  He is not British ethnicity.  He is genociding the British by Wright Island Model immigration.  This an intentional policy.  Khan’s job is to do what the definition of genocide above says.

“Adil Khan, head of diversity”

“destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group;”

Khan is engaged in genocide under the definition.  He is paid to do this.  The oppressed group are 011 British, i.e. ethnic British stock.

The two bloggers were exercising a fundamental right, the right to use humor against those engaged in genocide of them.

Kirk: “Khan — I’m laughing at the superior intellect.”–Laughing-at-the-Superior-IntellectWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Nerds-

That isn’t hate speech by Kirk, that’s the right to fight back.  The right to make jokes at those ethnically cleansing us is the right to keep our culture as we fight back.  Its the right to organize unity in our group to repel the invaders.  That is why they make it illegal.  They know that already.

Adil Khan.  Evil Khan.  Evil Adil Khan.  Adil Evil Khan.  Now look what has happened.  Khan would call it hate speech.  He would target it, yes he can.  In Britain he can.

If the hate speech bill passes in the Senate then yes he can and Eric Holder and Obama can in the U.S.  Because Khan doesn’t allow such hate speech, not for British or Americans.  White ones that is.  He allows himself all the hate speech he likes.

Eric Holder spelled that out specifically in his testimony to Congress.   Target whites, preferably British ethnic stock or something close to it.   Some of the links point to his testimony.  Holder said that Holder can call America a nation of cowards or whites a nation of cowards all he wants.  Yes he can.  But white Americans can’t say anything about blacks, no they can’t.  That is the Holder Rule.  He spelled it out to Congress.

Holder did that because he was sure the bill would pass and he wanted a legislative record for Sonia Sotomayor and other Hussein appointments to point to in their decisions so as to apply the law only to whites, because Holder said in his testimony to Congress it is only to whites.  Think University of Chicago Constitutional Law Lecturer Barack Hussein Obama pointed out to Holder that he should put that into the legislative record so that judges could point to Holder’s testimony, that the law targets whites only?

The Wright Island Model should have been used as a defense to this law and to charge Adil Khan.  That should be done in the US if this is tried here.  Blair, Brown, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Bush Sr, Kennedy, McCain, etc are guilty of genocide under the law already.   Clinton’s frequent statements of his intent to make whites a minority and his taking money from Saudi Arabia and UAE which continued immigration to the US after 9/11 shows that.

This is part of a petition to Congress to stop Wright Island Model immigration to the US and stop so called hate crime laws which are themselves genocide under the above definitino and mathematical theorem.

“It is important to remember this is a separate bill from S.909, the “Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act”. Some commentaries confuse the two. HR 1966 has so far made little progress, whereas S.909 has cleared the House and is very close to getting through the Senate.”

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.  Also, have you watched the shocking video that shows Attorney General Holder saying there is no equal protection under the hate bill?  It’s on the home page at””

Call Senate Judiciary to stop hate crime Bills Monday July 13 2009.  One day before July 14 the anniversary of liberating the Bastille, which had only two prisoners.  They were

“Simon Sheppard, 51, of Selby in North Yorkshire, received four years and 10 months, and Stephen Whittle, 42, of Preston, two years and four months.”

Members of the
Senate Committee on the Judiciary



  • Patrick J. Leahy (Ver.), Chairman
  • Herb Kohl (Wis.)
  • Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)
  • Russell D. Feingold (Wis.)
  • Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.)
  • Richard J. Durbin (Illin.)
  • Benjamin L. Cardin (Maryl.)
  • Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Is.)
  • Ron Wyden (Ore.)
  • Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)
  • Edward E. Kaufman (Dela.)
  • Arlen Specter (Penn.)
  • Orrin G. Hatch (Utah)
  • Charles E. Grassley (Iowa)
  • Jon Kyl (Ariz.)
  • Jeff Sessions (Alab.)
  • Lindsey Graham (S.C.)
  • John Cornyn (Texas)
  • Tom Coburn (Okla.)

Call now to liberate Americans from hate crime bills in honor of Bastille Day.  Call your Senator but especially if on Senate Judiciary.

For now, the following page is full of videos and information on this bill.

Note 011 British is a US Census Code and thus directed into the forum of the United States.  011 British should not be ethnically cleansed from America the way Adil Khan is doing it in the UK.  Sonia Sotomayor and Adil Khan are the same, ethnic cleansers of 011 British world wide.  They are generals of genocide of 011 British.  Call your senator to oppose Sonia Sotomayor for confirmation to the US Supreme Court as well.  Its like putting Adil Khan on the US Supreme Court.  We might as well give them the keys to US and UK subs with nukes next.  In fact, a Muslim born in Iran is head of FBI WMD, Vahid Majidi.

Think it matters?  Saudis and UAE were gotten out of US after 9/11.  Pakistan ISI General Ahmed was in US in week before 9/11 to demand US lift sanctions on Pakistan’s nuclear program, or it would be unjust.  That is what was written in US papers and Pakistan papers.  Then they did 9/11.  Think this doesn’t matter?  This matters.  Think of the time its cost you since 9/11 at airports.   Think of the several days delay when only Saudi nationals were allowed to fly in the US making their escape out.  It matters.  Adil Khan is here to genocide us physically not just mentally.  He works together with bin Laden. When you ride with Adil Khan bin Laden rides with the three of you.  Pakistan, UAE and Saudi links to 9/11 are documented here.

Senator Schumer has taken down his press releases on Saudi links to 9/11. Schumer saudi arabia 9/11

This may be a transition to a new website, but I didn’t find these ones spot on Saudi Arabia and 9/11 at the new one.


    Mar 19, 2003 SCHUMER: US MUST SHOW 9/11 FAMILIES THE BLUEPRINTS OF SAUDI SUPPORT FOR AL QAEDA. New US documents identify Saudi Arabian families as among…/PR01566.html – Similar


    A key figure in the 9/11 report that was released yesterday is reportedly living in Saudi Arabia and should be brought back to the United States for further…/PR01893.html – Similar


    Sep 10, 2003 Experts agree that Saudi Arabia is the epicenter of Wahhabist belief and that Zionists were responsible for 9-11 and claimed that Saudis…/PR02009.html – Similar

If Schumer is afraid, if its not just a website move, then what about you?  Adil Khan rides with the Saudis, UAE and Pakistan ISI to come after you.  This is your chance to seize the day and stand up for Liberty.  Be a Son or Daughter of Liberty.  Now is the time to be a Summer Patriot Caller to save our freedom of speech that once again has been stolen by the British government, this time by Adil Khan, the new overseer of 011 British.  Want one of those here.  Sonia Sotomayor is one.

This is the Summer of Freedom Fighting in America.  Call Senate Judiciary especially if in your state.  Let your voice be heard.  Phone calls count the most.  One phone call in a year is better than 12 faxes.  So make your call this week.  Think of those who sacrifice limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They sacrifice for what?  For your right to call your Senator in the Summer of Freedom from hate laws and hate judges like Sonia Sotomayor and hate overseers like Adil Khan.

“Khan: “Kirk, you’re still alive, my old friend.”  Kirk: “Still! Old! Friend!””–Still-Old-FriendWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-

“Who will raise their voice?”

If you are 011 British or are with them, don’t let your kind be subjected to hate speech laws, which means advocating your survival is hate speech.  This is the time.  Every phone call counts.

== Pakistan nuclear sanctions “unjust”

Hypothesis: Pakistan. Timeline: Week before 9/11/2001, the head of Pakistan’s ISI came to the US and met with US leaders to try to get sanctions lifted. That failed. He gave the go-ahead for 9/11 to al Qaeda in the DC area.

Then he met with US intensively following few days. US agreed to life sanctions and pay money to Pakistan. He then gave the signal to the anthrax team to mail the anthrax on 9/18. Reason? 9/11 was to turn on US concern for al Qaeda and that they needed Pakistan’s help to get to Afghanistan.

Once they got the money they sent out anthrax made from spores from a US lab to turn US attention to domestic terrorism. Once they got the money they wanted to turn attention away from Pakistan. It basically worked.

Before 9/11, there was talk the US might lift sanctions on India but not Pakistan. Pakistan already considered the sanctions unjust. The head of ISI was a fundamentalist and unjust in that context means its not just ok to kill but whatever it takes is required to do to remove the unjust situation.

Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001

NEW YORK: The Bush administration is preparing to lift punitive sanctions imposed on India for its nuclear program. But clearing this hurdle to bolster political, economic and military ties with India while maintaining even sterner sanctions on Pakistan would be seen throughout the Middle East as discrimination of the first order. Islamabad would be pushed in dangerous directions, particularly toward increased reliance on its nuclear and missile programs.

Further crippling a weak Pakistan, perhaps to the point of state failure, would invite its myriad problems to spill over into other countries. Islamic militancy, arms and drug trafficking and religiously motivated sectarian violence could have devastating consequences for India’s economic prospects and cause trouble in important Islamic oil-producing countries. Risks to U.S. forces and interests in the Middle East would be a virtual certainty.


Search Pakistan “sanctions lifted” 2001, and other similar searches. Toss in nuclear, IMF, etc. Pakistan’s central banker on 9/11 later wrote a book and said Pakistan was unable to continue w/o lifting sanctions. That meant Pakistan would have to give up its nuclear program but India wouldn’t. That would be “unjust”.

has info on Pakistan and 9/11. Can look up meetings ISI and US after 9/11 before 9/18. Also has an anthrax timeline.

By Sep 23 2001 Sanctions lifted in the news.

Pakistan knew that before 9/18/01. There were also anthrax incidents in Pakistan in 2001 after 9/11. Pakistan ISI was capable of getting anthrax from a US source and then producing it. Only Pakistan and the others involved in 9/11 could plan it all out in advance and be ready to mail on 9/18 from NJ and from Florida the fake letters to same people, e.g. NBC.

Only Pakistan had a motive to divert attention from 9/11 on 9/18 because then they had the money and sanctions lifted deal. Means, motive, opportunity, timing. It all fits Pakistan.

Pakistan also has the MO before 9/11 and up to now. In 1999, Musharraf invaded Kargil and said Pakistani troops were terrorists. India won and wanted to return the bodies of Pakistan soldiers, but Pakistan still said they were terrorists and wouldn’t take the bodies of their own soldiers.


The Heretical 2 case:

Judge Rodney Grant told the men their material was “abusive and insulting” and had the potential to cause “grave social harm”.

He added: “Such offences as these have, by their very nature, the potential to cause grave social harm, particularly in a society such as ours which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.

‘Groundbreaking case’

“These are serious offences. I can say without any hesitation that I have rarely seen, or had to read or consider, material which is so abusive and insulting… towards racial groups within our own society.”

“Pakistan:Leaving U.S. Sanctions in Place Would Be Grave
By Mansoor Ijaz, R. James Woolsey and James A. Abrahamson
Published: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001”

Almost the same language from Adil Khan and his pet judge and Pakistan on Sep 7 2001 to the US with former CIA James Woolsey on the side of Pakistan ISI delivering in effect was an ultimatum on the United States.  Atta was in the DC area the week before 9/11. He came up from Florida on his way to New Jersey.  When the US didn’t agree to life sanctions, did ISI General Mahmood Ahmed (also spelled alternative ways) then give Mohamed Atta the order?

Pakistan nuclear sanctions unjust

How long until the above speech is labeled hate speech against our ally Pakistan and its ISI?  How long until the website Complete 9/11 Timeline is hate speech?  How long until the BBC takes down its webpages that have links to 9/11 and Pakistan ISI?  Senator Schumer has already removed if it isn’t just a move his webpages linking Saudi Arabia to 9/11.  After 9/11, only Saudis and UAE could fly and that was to leave the US.

The Saudi Ambassador’s wife had given funds to the handlers who met the hijackers in California before 9/11.  How long until that becomes hate speech against Saudis and Islam? How long until stopping Muslims is a hate crime?  Atta was thought a hijacker by an American official but he didn’t stop him because that would be racist.  How will it be after Eric Holder and Barack Hussein Obama get their hate laws going?  How long until using Hussein’s middle name will be hate speech?  If you want your freedom and your life call Senate Judiciary this week or call your Senator if not on Senate Judiciary.

Do you want Adil Khan giving diversity training to our security people at airports?  You want Adil Khan praising them for searching Al Gore and for not stopping Atta?  You want Khan to say the agent who thought he was racist to want to stop Atta was right, he was racist and now is in prison?  Think it can’t happen here?  9/11 did happen here.  Call those Senators.  They practically work for Saudi Arabia as it is already.  Let them know they work for you.  Let them know you want your freedom and your life.

And you don’t want to wait at airports when the real hijackers go in without being stopped.  Think that’s racist? Adil Khan does.  Atta was one of the hijackers.  He wasn’t stopped because the agent thought it was racist to stop him.  Think Adil Khan will change that when he is in charge?  Think Vahid Majidi has changed that?  He already is in charge of FBI WMD.  Call your Senator.

==Quote Vdare inside this section

David Hench of the Portland Press Herald interviewed U.S. Air ticket agent Michael Tuohey in 2005 and recounted that fateful encounter.

“Then [Tuohey’s] eyes locked on Atta.

“’It just sent chills through you. You see his picture in the paper (now). You see more life in that picture than there is in flesh and blood,’ Tuohey said.

“Then Tuohey went through an internal debate that still haunts him.

“‘I said to myself, “If this guy doesn’t look like an Arab terrorist, then nothing does.” Then I gave myself a mental slap, because in this day and age, it’s not nice to say things like this,’ he said.”   [More]

==End quote Vdare

Who is laughing at this? Adil Khan is laughing.  He is laughing all the way to the next terrorist attack.

Khan: “Time is a luxury you don’t have.”–Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan-Ricardo-Montalban-Khan-Noonien-Singh-Time-Is-A-Luxury-You-Do-Not-Have

Call your Senator.

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.  Also, have you watched the shocking video that shows Attorney General Holder saying there is no equal protection under the hate bill?  It’s on the home page at””

The right to stop the terrorists is the same as the right to laugh at jokes about them.  They are one and the same.  Adil Khan knows that.  He is following the playbook of the Left to colonize the West.   Adil Khan’s colonization isn’t nice.  Its the same as bin Laden’s.  Adil Khan is a more effective bin Laden.


Khan “”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

Wonder who he means by “you”?  Sort of odd expression for a policeman isn’t it?  Aren’t they supposed to wait for a crime and investigate it?  When do they issue general threats for speech they don’t like?  Who does he mean by you?  Would that be British citizens including non-whites?  Or would that be British as in:

“Mumbai Terrorists Told to “Kill Whites, Especially British and Americans””

Did Adil Khan have these same chaps in mind when he said “you”?

==Just to repeat

“”From hell’s heart, I stab at thee. For hates’ sake, I spit my last breath at thee.””

“thee” and “you” and “kill whites preferably British and American.”  All the same?  What type of American is that?  US Census Code 011 British perhaps?  Or other census codes will do in a pinch?  Like German perhaps?  Or French? Just possibly?  Like Barack Hussein Obama not having dinner with the President of France when he visited France after Hussein’s Cairo speech to the Ummah?

The Ummah that includes Adil Khan and whoever issued instructions to “target whites preferably British and American.”  There seems some confusion in the reporting whether it was kill or target whites and whether it was preferably or especially.  But no confusion about who they meant by British and American.

They didn’t mean Adil Khan that is for sure.  Adil Khan understood whom they meant.  He meant them too.   They both think as one on who whom.   They are on the same page on that.  Funny how that is isn’t it?  Almost like they shared something in common.  Funny, Adil Khan probably insists he is British to the whites on the force.  But then again, when he says “you”, he means something a little more specific.

Adil Khan: target whites, preferably British and American.  Works for him.

In the world of Adil Khan, Eric Holder and Barrack Hussein Obama, “target whites, preferably British and American” is not a hate crime.  “It is a consummation devoutly to be wished.”  Sonia Sotomayor joins in that too.  She also knows who whom.  In Obama’s case, he makes it clear.  He gave fellow Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain the finger in public and called Sarah Palin a pig, all in public on videotape.

Just because Obama makes a face doesn’t mean he didn’t know it.

You can drag it to second 48 and see him put his hand over his forehead when he implies Sarah Palin is a pig.  That’s with him saying the words.
Obama giving McCain the finger

Obama giving Hillary the finger

We know who he was targeting then.

Let’s hear Khan say it, say it for all of them:–I-Spit-My-Last-Breath-at-TheeWrath-of-Khan-Fanclub-Wrath-of-Khan-Film-Animation-Ricardo-Montalban-is-the-Man-


Adil Khan works to make permanent what bin Laden made temporary, terror in our hearts so that we lose the will to fight back.  Of the two, Adil Khan is the more deadly by far.  When Adil Khan wins, all our people will die.  Slowly to be sure, but the end is certain.  All 011 British die under Khan.  All whites in the West die under Khan.  Slowly.  With much unpleasantness, but the end is certain.  Unless you call your Senator to stop the hate crimes bill and stop the Adil Khans in their track.


More commentary on the case here:


“”The fact is now that we’ve been able to demonstrate that you’ve got nowhere to hide; people have been hiding on [sic] the fact that this server was in the US.”

So who is Adil Khan addressing when he says “you’ve”?  White British?  Wouldn’t that make it a hate crime for a policeman to target white ethnic British that way?  Doesn’t sound very fair.  Could Adil Khan be charged for this remark?  Can it be used in an appeal to show bias on Khan’s part?  Bias in Adil Khan?  I’m shocked.

What about Eric Holder’s testimony and Obama’s not rescinding it?  That the law targets whites?  Isn’t that conspiracy to deny whites their civil rights?  You don’t get to violate the law just because you are Attorney General and President do you?  Holder’s testimony and Obama’s not contradicting it especially after the Nation of Cowards speech show an intent to apply the laws unevenly against whites.  That is conspiracy to deny whites their civil rights.  That can be charged by state and local prosecutors not just federal prosecutors.  They can convene a grand jury and have Obama and Holder indicted.


Kirk: “I don’t believe in the no-win scenario.”–Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan-William-Shatner-Admiral-James-T-Kirk-I-Do-Not-Believe-in-the-No-Win-Scenario

Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121 with this message: “Please tell the Senator not to vote for the hate crimes bill.”

Stop the no-win scenario that Adil Khan thinks he has set for us.

This is draft and preliminary.  Comments and corrections welcome.  All other disclaimers apply.

Obama America and Britain only connected by language

March 4, 2009

Obama says that America and Britain are only connected by the English language and nothing else.

Mr. Brown is the first European leader to meet with Mr. Obama since the president took office in January. Some observers in Britain are concerned the new administration is not committed to the decades-long “special relationship” enjoyed by London and Washington.

Mr. Obama dismissed those concerns as “misguided,” saying the U.S. and Britain are sustained by a common language and culture.

Obama returned the Churchill bust from White House that was loaned after 9/11.

Patrick Cleburne

–Following from Patrick Cleburne

The reason why according to The Telegraph

a bust of Mr Lincoln now sits in the Oval Office where Epstein’s Churchill once ruled the roost.

is that Obama detests founding-stock Americans (and, no doubt, their cousins). Lincoln’s bust is in the Oval Office because he killed more of them than anybody else. Obama hates them partly because of his traiterous mother and partly because in Affirmative Action America that is the attitude that pays.

— end Cleburne quote

Brenda Walker

These may be the “Britons” that Obama identifies with:

El Ingles at Gates Vienna on BNP

February 17, 2009

Pick a Tribe, Any Tribe
by El Inglés


“For even I, gentle reader, have too much of the cosmopolitan in me to rejoice in the notion of people identifying each other as mortal enemies for tribal reasons. Viewing the BNP homepage on one occasion for reasons which now escape me, I remember feeling my eyes start to glaze over at the group photos of happy white people being happy and white together. Why was it so important for them all to be white? What if one of them had been an Inuit? Would something terrible have happened? Were the Inuit any less worthy of human consideration, just because their ancestors went right when mine went left?”
I view BNP support as playing a role similar to that of a price in a free-market economy, which is to say that I see it as a signal conveying a certain type of information. If the BNP were to be banned and its support therefore to disappear at the electoral level, this information would be lost to the system, easing the pressure on the establishment parties to formulate a real response to Islamization, which I fervently hope they will eventually do.

Vanishing American has an excellent column which discusses this El Ingles piece, “The decline of “democracy”, and tribalism”

(Comments below at times, and to begin with, are as if expressed to El Ingles.  So you means El Ingles.  They are really meant as questions for discussion and not a criticism of El Ingles or others holding similar views.)

If your foxhole is full of PCers expect to lose.  Join up with the BNP.  It really is the only choice in England.  You don’t seem to want the BNP to win.  What do you want?

You say that Gordon Brown and the PCers will get more pro-Muslim.  Do you expect the resistance to become more pro-Muslim too?  Or to become more centered around the British people?

What do you want?  A slow process of genetic replacement where the bulk happens after you are dead?  Isn’t that the heart of PC cowardice?  Isn’t that Gordon Brown’s wish too?  And his plan?  In the end aren’t you the same as Brown?  Let the other side win, but after I’m gone.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Isn’t that your plan too?

The above is the actual theorem governing the situation.  When the genes are replaced the culture is too.

To stop the theorem you have to reverse the force.  That’s the math.  That’s the choice.


Better to have the BNP Ballerina passing ammunition than El Ingles who might suddenly decide too many white people here.  Is that what he thinks when he sees faces of British troops in old photos or war films?  Too many whites?  Why are they all white?

His money quote:

For even I, gentle reader, have too much of the cosmopolitan in me to rejoice in the notion of people identifying each other as mortal enemies for tribal reasons.

Actually, the BNP Ballerina is more cosmopolitan.  It isn’t cosmopolitan, its just plain disloyalty and dislike of your own.   El Ingles.  The name says it all.  Ashamed to be English.


A comment I posted at VA:

I agree with Cabbageroll’s comment and Western’s Critique.  For me the money quote from El Ingles is:

“For even I, gentle reader, have too much of the cosmopolitan in me to rejoice in the notion of people identifying each other as mortal enemies for tribal reasons. Viewing the BNP homepage on one occasion for reasons which now escape me, I remember feeling my eyes start to glaze over at the group photos of happy white people being happy and white together. Why was it so important for them all to be white? What if one of them had been an Inuit? Would something terrible have happened? Were the Inuit any less worthy of human consideration, just because their ancestors went right when mine went left?”

El Ingles makes it clear he doesn’t really think of himself as Mr. English.

==Comments from earlier VA posts

Great article VA with important quotes and insights. I can’t avoid elaborating on it if only to restate it.

For the virtuous to let the vicious vote the end of virtue is itself unvirtuous. Virtue is incomplete that lets virtue itself be destroyed by the vicious. Gets back close to Barry Goldwater.

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!

But it has to be self-sustaining justice and virtue that are defended in an extreme way. Giving away virtue and justice is not virtue or justice.

Complete virtue and complete justice include the perpetuation of virtue and justice. And to the extent they are not reached yet, it means an approach towards them that converges not moves away from the target.

Liberalism moves away from the target of justice by not comprehending justice or virtue. Justice comes from virtue. There is no justice in an unvirtuous society perhaps or litte of it. (Which is what Plato meant perhaps.) Liberals send virtue packing by a variety of means including getting rid of the genes for virtue and replacing them with genes for unvirtue (relative to a society virtuous with respect to white genes).

If the delicate genes of virtue are eliminated, the result is to eliminate the meaning of justice. Its to return to the jungle.

Virtue and justice are concepts linked to a society with genes and culture to promote them and make them useful and meaningful.

Liberalism destroys justice and a just society by trying to extend the concept of justice to those who are not virtuous by reason of their genes and culture.

The virtues of white society depend on white genes and white culture as both have developed together. When the non-white is brought in on equal terms the result is to destroy the society built on a delicate balance.

This is another reason non-whites need to go back to their continents and leave us ours. But they don’t have the virtue or sense of justice to do that on their own. They will simply leech on us until we are dead and then move on without any thought forwards while we are here or backwards when we are gone.

Its up to us to have complete virtue and complete justice, which is to perpetuate virtue and justice by perpetuating ourselves and our society with us as the dominant majority. v=1…feature=related

Above is a pro white child video by Saga. Its Tomorrow Belongs to Me. It shows white children. Liberals would call this the usual names.

OA – that is a good video. Beautiful.

Any ‘legitimately’-obtained successes on their part in this regard, obtained through whatsoever means, are in fact rendered illegitimate due to the cancellation of the democratic contract and corruption of the democratic game that their presence in Britain implied from the start.

It would scarcely be credible to suggest that there is no real political momentum being established here, or that the recent bowing and scraping to the believers is in actual fact little more than a trivial imbalance in the political equilibrium, soon to be corrected by Gordon Brown denouncing Muhammad as a paedophile and a murderer in the House of Commons, spittle flying from his lips. As Muslims continue to flood into the UK, it will become ever more difficult to avoid building on the precedents set in these days of cowardice for reasons I have examined at length elsewhere, but that are intuitively obvious anyway.

If the BNP were to be banned and its support therefore to disappear at the electoral level, this information would be lost to the system, easing the pressure on the establishment parties to formulate a real response to Islamization, which I fervently hope they will eventually do.

The whole article is a series of such contradictions.  He won’t be for the white English and he won’t accept their end.  But he won’t do anything but wait for the establishment parties.  And who forces their hand?  BNP.  Will he help BNP?  No.  So he will do nothing.

The establishment parties have their plan.  Its to genocide us.  Its for it to happen after they die.  Its for them to make a lot of money and live in gated communities while we are killed by the ethnic cleansing immigrants.  Its happening now.  They see it.

If it wasn’t their plan they would have changed already.  Republicans made it clear that was their plan with McCain and Steele.  They’ve chosen.  So has David Cameron.  So has Gordon Brown.  The New York Times chose to be owned by Carlos Slim.  They then attacked us as nativists.  They are his attack dog.

“Why I won’t fight” by El Ingles

is an alternative title.

recognizing that tribal feelings of a type I myself feel no strong attraction towards will play a vital role in the defence of what is good in that country; insisting that standard democratic processes will have to be cast aside to remove the influence of pernicious ideologies: to be frank, I would rather not have to think about any these things at all.

Why I will fight with BNP by Mr. English

is what we need.

“When a man is lying in a shell hole, if he just stays there all day, a third world immigrant will get to him eventually.  His job.  His community.   His school.  All gone.  The hell with that idea. The hell with taking it.

That ethnic cleansing by 3rd world immigrants can be with a gun, knife, taking a job, affirmative action, bringing in more 3rd world immigrants, stimulus for 3rd world immigrants, bailout for immigrant mortgage defaults, lower rate mortgages for immigrants, cities and states for immigrants, schools for immigrants, immigrant studies which are just ethnic cleansing white meetings.   We can’t just sit and take any of it.  We have to fight back.  That means doing what it takes to achieve victory. Real victory.  Not where the 3rd world immigrants win on the next round.


El Ingles summary:

White survival means white survival.  I don’t really like that.  But I would like it to happen without my being responsible for it.  That’s the real fascism.

When you turn survival over to the leader and you don’t want to know or be involved. And the leader may decide its you who doesn’t survive. That’s what our leaders have decided now.

We live in fascism right now and its genociding us.  Its doing it because you don’t want to be involved with our survival.  You just want it to happen. You want the leaders to do it.  Well the leaders are ethnically cleansing us, precisely because you won’t get involved.

You have to get involved all the way if you want to stop fascism.  People stopping leaders from genociding them is anti-fascism.  Not genocide in the future.  Its happening right now.  BNP is fighting fascism now.  BNP is fighting genocide now.

LibLabCon Democrats Republicans are real fascism and real genocide happening right now.  Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Barack Hussein Obama, George Bush, John McCain are the real fascist leaders practicing genocide on us right now.  Stopping that right now isn’t fascism its stopping establishment PC fascism.

The establishment PC fascism that came because you didn’t want to be bothered, you wanted the establishment parties to do it for you, provide for your existence and the survival of your extended family.  You don’t want to be bothered with those tasks.  They don’t either.  So your existence is being terminated by them at a profit to them and their financial masters.  But you don’t want to think about it.

Be what the PC left hates most

December 15, 2008

Your first duty is to yourself. Your second duty is to your family. Your third duty is to your (real) friends. Your fourth duty is to your nation. If you live in a multicultural society, your fourth duty is to your tribe; your fifth one is to your nation. Your sixth duty is to humanity. Your seventh duty is to Planet Earth. All these duties coexist, and none may be pursued without proportional regard for the others. Proportional is the operative word.

Saving Western Civilization must entail as well separation from Muslims and from Third World Latinos(6), which these groups already practice toward whites. How to separate without cruel and unjust policies is an issue beyond the scope of this discussion, as it requires a fully-informed consideration of the specific circumstances in each Western country separately.

(6) A few Latinos have lived in the United States since before there was a United States. These are obviously not meant to be included in this statement.

Vanishing American comments on Takuan Seiyo. So does James Edwards:

Great post and comments above.  If you can’t sing it or wear it you can’t fight for it.  The British like BNP know who they are fighting for. They know who they are.  When you deny who you are, you have nothing to fight for.

The PC right construct a set of principles that are only good to pass through the gates set for them by the PC left.  Those who go slightly right of that are still constructing artificial rationales that don’t work.  They are still looking to the PC left to define what is the good.

Its the ancient peoples of Europe who know who they are and who have something understandable to fight for.  They can sing it, wear it, speak it and its instantaneously recognizable who they are and what they are fighting for.

This is what the PC left is trying to kill.  You can’t take PC leftism and create the authentic symbols that people actually have fought for and under for centuries.

I have posted this video before, but a few seconds are enough to recognize what its for and about.


If it can’t be explained this way, this quickly, it isn’t going anywhere.  Defeating the above type of nativist jingoist etc expression is what PC leftism was invented to do.  That is why it hates it so.  That is why it vilifies.

We have to be what the PC left hates.  We have to say what they hate.  We have to be hated by the PC left, because they hate precisely what is capable of surviving.  They know that. Its time we did too.


Charles Johnson of LGF denounces Brussels Journal article.

LGF own editorial:

In an extremely verbose article that begins with a bizarre science fictional premise that “white Europeans” suffer from a disease only they can catch, Brussels Journal openly advocates tribal nationalism and white separatism.

The mask is completely gone now. This article is indistinguishable from the rubbish you’ll find at sites like the neo-Nazi Stormfront — except that the author, “Takuan Seiyo,” tries mightily to sound like he’s actually denouncing white supremacism, while simultaneously embracing all of its ideological bases. He attempts to short circuit criticism with twisted rationalizations like this:

LGF quotes the following passage:

The tribe I imagine is a sort of ethno-conservative and culturally reactionary white ummah stretching from New Zealand to Alaska, the way the Muslim ummah spans from the remotest islands of Indonesia through Bosnia to British Columbia, but without the negative baggage. In each nation, people who have not yet morphed into Body Snatchers already know how to define themselves as a local ethny, but a universal component is needed as well.

The British National Party’s constitution defines BNP’s constituency as “indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain.”

Good definition, but one day it will be nice to see a phrase added that asserts solidarity with a list of similar parties in 40 other countries. For now, the vehement Fascism(3) of Body Snatcher society is such that by merely mentioning the BNP I am subjecting this website to criticism and am placing myself on a variety of black lists and white lists maintained in some windowless cubicles by Pod apparatchiks no less fanatical than were the Stasi functionaries rifling through East German population’s letters and underpants [sic] in the basement of the Stasi Headquarters in the Berlin suburb of Lichtenfeld.

LGF states:

It’s sickening—and almost beyond belief that Brussels Journal, who are closely affiliated with the Vlaams Belang, would publish something so openly racist at a time when they’re under the microscope more than ever before,

This is the time to stand up for what you believe.  James Watson lost his chance to do that.  Take the chance.  Its when the Charles Johnson type hate comes forth that one should affirm one’s position, and even double it.

Are these the kinds of sentiments the Wall Street Journal wants to support—praise for the fascist British National Party and white separatism? And if you’re linking to them, is this the kind of “conservatism” you want to support?

Its precisely supporting BNP, Vlaams Belang and Brussels Journal at such a time that counts.  We want to win, not be approved by Charles Johnson and the PC Left and PC Right as we go extinct.

“Who will raise their voice?”

The time to raise your voice for your own survival and to maintain white majorities in all white countries is now.  Separatism means the 3rd worlders return to their countries not that we give up ours.  The latter is a recipe for defeat and admits defeat before we start.  We keep all our lands and 3rd worlders go home.  That’s what separation means.

Say what you really want, not what Charles Johnson says you can say.  We want our lands, all of them.  If you say the 3rd worlders can have part of them, then you are already admitting defeat and that Charles Johnson’s fear tactics control what you can say.  All our lands.  White majorities in all our lands.  We don’t give up any of our lands.

No one will fight to give up part of our lands.  No one will fight to repeat this over again.  We have to have a program and a dream worth fighting for.  Giving up part of our lands is no such dream and no such program.

Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably will not themselves be realized.

All our lands is our plan.  Giving up part of our lands is to lose the fight for men’s minds and hearts before it starts.  We can’t get people to rally to keep part of our lands, we have to rally them to keep them all.  Every inch.


The reason the neocons failed was they didn’t make it their plan to take all Muslim nukes, eject Muslims from the West, stop 3rd world immigration, and end Islam world wide.  They needed a plan to win.  They should have taken the opportunity after 9/11 to crush Islam the way Europe should have done in 1500 and ever since.  Do it while we can or face extinction.  That is our only choice with Islam.

The neocons flubbed 9/11 and lost their chance because they didn’t plan for victory.  So they got defeat and are hated and detested for it.  That’s what happens to those who plan their own defeat as the best possible outcome.  That’s why we have to plan to keep all our lands.

Charles Johnson already hates us and he was supposedly on our side.  He opposes victory over Islam.  He supports certain defeat and opposes all measures to achieve victory.  This is because he opposes our very survival from the start.

Charles Johnson is part of the PC Left Right which are really the same. They both oppose the symbols of us.  They hate them on sight and condemn them on sight.  They condemn us when we use them and they really just condemn us.  PC is about not letting us be for us.  That is why they hate us whatever we do, if we are for us.  In fact, they just hate us.  They intend our extinction.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

That’s our fate in their plan. We need a plan that meets the test of this theorem, not one that delays our extinction.  That means stop the flow in and reverse it to go out.  We are supposed to spread our alleles for higher intelligence, empathy, non-violence, honoring contracts, and impartial administration of justice.

We either spread those genes world wide or they spread theirs and extinct all such genes.  Those are the only two mathematical outcomes available. We have to plan the one to get people to fight for it or suffer the other. Charles Johnson has chosen our total extinction, not survival in a mixture, but total extinction.

There is no equilibrium of 3rd world theft and destroy and indifference genes and Western white empathy, civilization, order, contract honoring, fairness, altruism genes.  Only one set of those genes can survive in equilibrium.  There is no other possible outcome.  We have to fight for and plan for the survival of the good genes.  That is the only way for mankind to have a future.

Right now there is a fight in Athens between 3rd world asylum seekers and legal immigrants and the Greeks.  The Greeks have to eject the entire 3rd world population, legal or not, or they won’t survive. That is their stark choice.  We can see it in the situation of others.  We should see it for ourselves.  We have seen this same play in France in the car burnings and on the streets of London.  The only solution is total ejection of the 3rd world influx.

The solution is not give them Birmingham, Paris, London, Rome, Athens, and Jerusalem. Charles Johnson says that Vlaams Belang was not invited to the Jerusalem conference of anti-jihadis.  We save all our cities or known.  That also includes Los Angeles and New York and San Francisco.  Save them all or save none.  We need our cities to be us.  They have to go back to the 3rd world enriched by their time here and make their own cities there, not destroy ours here.

Brussels Journal part of WSJ list:

Vdare didn’t make the list.


Why is it that its so wrong for them to return to their people and their lands to live among them?  They have most of the surface of the earth.

White flight is exactly that reunification.  Whites would gladly have their own lands that 3rd worlders couldn’t come to and move to them if they were available.  If whites want to go home to their own people and own lands, why is it so bad for 3rd worlders to go home to their own people and own lands?

Why is it we can’t have our own people and our own lands?  That is the real issue here.  The 3rd worlders here and the PC Left and Right both oppose our having our own lands and being our own people. That is what they will not agree to.

The real issue comes down to this.  Charles Johnson and the PC Right and Left, the Obama C. Rice, C. Powell, Jindal worshipers won’t let us have our own lands and be our own people.  There is no place for white flight in their world.  Whites can’t flee, only go extinct.  We either agree to their plan or we oppose it.

White lands for white people.  3rd worlders take their enriched experience here back to their lands to make them more like here.  That’s the plan to move men’s minds.  If you can’t move their minds, you can’t move their feet.

3rd worlders should be excited at the chance to take what they have learned here and the money they earned here and go back and make their lands and peoples better.  That is a noble purpose for them.  Staying here and extincting us and our civilization is no noble purpose for them.  Nor is it for us.  That should not be our plan for ourselves, nor theirs for them.

BNP 12000 immortals list of heroes online

November 18, 2008

List of the saints.  To be on that list is to be on the list of heroes like Waterloo, Trafalgar, and the Battle of Britain.  To be on the list is to be immortal.  If the British People (as in US census code 011 British) last 12000 years it will be because of those on the list.

These are individual heroes.  They don’t come to this in a group. They are not ordered to do it by government.  They didn’t get draft cards.  Each person on the list has made a testament to truth on their own act of conscience. They have risked all for their kin, despite the ingratitude and hate shown by the official minders of PC.  Many are with them.  And the numbers are growing and not just in  Britain.  We are a great people and when we are united we can not be defeated.

Churchill said it, and it has been true throughout history.  When evil has marched it has been us who have stopped it for centuries.  No other people can make this claim.

Our Union Jack

Men of Harlech Zulu

Nick Griffin leads the BNP like another Churchill.


And did those feet in ancient time,

Walk upon England’s mountains green
And was the holy Lamb of God,

On England’s pleasant pastures seen
And did the Countenance Divine,

Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here,

Among these dark Satanic Mills?
Bring me my Bow of burning gold;

Bring me my Arrows of desire:
Bring me my Spear: O clouds unfold:

Bring me my Chariot of fire!
I will not cease from Mental Fight,

Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
Till we have built Jerusalem,

In England’s green and pleasant Land.

We are a great people.

We can not be defeated if we are united.

Cheddar Man British DNA 9000 Years old

May 31, 2008

By The Associated Press
LONDON — Using DNA from a tooth, scientist have established a blood tie between a 9,000-year-old skeleton known as “Cheddar Man” and an English schoolteacher who lives just a half mile from the cave where the bones were found.
Oxford University scientists announced Friday that Adrian Targett, 42, a history teacher in the town of Cheddar in southwest England, shares a common ancestor with Cheddar Man.
It is the longest human lineage ever traced, the team of scientists from the university’s Institute of Molecular Medicine said.

“They would have shared a common ancestor about 10,000 years ago, so they are related — just not very closely,” said Dr. Bryan Sykes, leader of the research team.

If Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron have their way, the descendants of Cheddar Man will all vanish from the earth and especially from England. BTW British DNA does not mean Pakistani or Arab DNA. Cheddar Man is US Census Code 011 British.

%d bloggers like this: