Archive for the 'Afghanistan' Category

re Andrew Bacevich Endless war, a recipe for four-star arrogance

June 27, 2010

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/25/AR2010062502160.html

Above link has oped by Andrew J. Bacevich Sunday, June 27, 2010 Washington Post, Bastion of elitist immigration complex.
==

“Throughout history, circumstances such as these have bred praetorianism, warriors becoming enamored with their moral superiority and impatient with the failings of those they are charged to defend. The smug disdain for high-ranking civilians casually expressed by McChrystal and his chief lieutenants — along with the conviction that “Team America,” as these officers style themselves, was bravely holding out against a sea of stupidity and corruption — suggests that the officer corps of the United States is not immune to this affliction. ”

The elites including Congress and the academics show this by an immigration policy that is genocide. Its a math theorem that immigration is genocide.

==
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

Copyright notice

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
==

There are many variants of this theorem.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/wright-island-model/

==

“Throughout history, circumstances such as these have bred corporate cultural elitism, elites becoming enamored with their moral superiority and impatient with the failings of those they are charged to defend. The smug disdain for low-ranking civilians casually expressed by Obama and his chief lieutenants — along with the conviction that “Team Diversity,” as these Czars and cabinet officers style themselves, was bravely holding out against a sea of stupidity and racism — suggests that the governing corps of the United States is not immune to this affliction. ”

When the elites, banking, academic and government race replace the people with immigration it is the obligation of the people to throw them off.

“That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. ”

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/doi/text.html

Genociding whites because they are white is reason for the people to cast off this government and these elites. This is what the elites fear. This is why Obama and Emanuel and Biden, the Diversity Troika fired the general. They are engaged in genocide of the whites. So its not surprising they are afraid of being cast off.

==

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/25/AR2010062502160_Comments.html

Posted in comments at 6/27/2010 7:45:13 AM

==
“rsryland wrote:
As a former history professor I understand the inductive reasoning in this piece. However, it is culture bound. Americans have not only passed the buck to the generals, but you have also forgotten the message of past wars such as Viet Nam in which ethnocentricism was the enemy which got you in the end. Sadly, it’s not just geo-politics you don’t get, but also massive budget deficits and a national debt which threaten the world economy.
6/27/2010 1:44:00 AM”

This summarizes the elite opinion exactly, its white racism that is the real enemy. They conclude race replacement of whites by immigration is the solution.

Sending whites to die in Afghanistan and race replacing them with Afghans and Pakistanis at the same time is the real crime. That is the crime of elites determined to genocide the White Race. That is the real conflict here. Obama, Emanuel and Biden are determined to race replace whites. The elites are with them. Its now a question whether whites can somehow organize themselves to stop it. That is the question of our time. That is the war of our time. Whites need to just win this war.

6/27/2010 8:22:16 AM

==
The government has declared war on the White Race. The government is waging a war of genocide on the white race. The Diversity Troika of Obama, Emanuel, and Biden is waging war on the White Race’s existence. That means genociding whites. Whites have a moral duty to fight back against this war being waged on their existence.

“That to secure these white rights, white governments are instituted among white men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the white governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to the White Race, it is the right of the white people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new white government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect white safety and happiness. ”

Endless immigration, a recipe for banker, academic, and Congressional-Presidential-Justices arrogance.

It may be that a military coup is one of the few ways for whites to survive. The military would find that ending genocide and restoring a white majority is the best way to justify a coup, whatever the real motive. So these currents may find each other.

Diversity Troika fired McChrystal with hate of Southern and British Whites

June 24, 2010

The following article shows that McChrystal had a unique network in the military and unique skills.

http://defensetech.org/2010/06/24/will-the-afghan-war-suffer-from-mcchrystal%E2%80%99s-ouster/

=Excerpt

“He had better battlefield situational awareness than any other commander out there,” one former operator told me. McChrystal, who spent much of his career in the “black” special operations world, understood that the best weapon to fight terrorist and insurgent networks was another network, and he put those networks in place in Iraq, Afghanistan and other parts of the world.

Those personal networks McChrystal built up during his time in the black SOF world, “special mission unit” commanders that he knew and had worked with for years, he brought with him to Afghanistan; some who still commanded SOF units, others who now commanded units among the general purpose force.

Read more: http://defensetech.org/2010/06/24/will-the-afghan-war-suffer-from-mcchrystal%E2%80%99s-ouster/#ixzz0rnBiE73T
Defense.org

=End Excerpt

The Diversity Troika of Obama, Emanuel and Biden deliberately chose to increase the number of men and women who come home without limbs and whose families have to care for them that way for the rest of their lives. Disproportionately those are Southern Whites and their British cousins. The Diversity Troika knew they were causing more Anglo whites in the South, Midwest and Britain to live out their lives without limbs.

Everytime you see a serviceman or woman without a limb, you can visualize the faces of Obama, Emanuel and Biden where their limb would have been.

The Diversity Troika chose this intentionally out of not just personal pique but a deep contempt and disdain for Anglos in the US military and British military. Obama has shown his hatred for this ethnic stock and for the British over and over. This is where this gut decision comes from, Obama’s gut of hate for Anglo whites.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/23/AR2010062305448.html?hpid=topnews

Posted at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/23/AR2010062305448_Comments.html

West’s Rational and Irrational Choices on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan

August 23, 2007

We present a set of rational and irrational choices the West has for its policy in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, and the Persian Gulf.

Scenario 1: Bleed in Afghanistan.

US forces in Afghanistan, out of Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan to keep US monthly casualty rate high. Iran,Iraq, and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is supported by some Democratic candidates for president and some other leading Democrats. There is also some Republican support for this. This is also favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 2: Bleed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

US forces in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan and Iraq to keep US casualty rate high. Iran and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is close to a second choice supported by some Democratic and Republican candidates for president and some other leading Democrats and Republicans. This is also somewhat favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 3: Admit defeat and bring the war home.

US out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Persian Gulf. Iran and Pakistan nuclear. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq bases of international terrorism. US allows immigration and travel from Islamic lands to West.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Appeasing policymakers.
Advocates: Some in MSM, Some Democrats.

Variant of 1, 2 and 3: An ineffective missile and air attack on Iran leading to the Persian Gulf being closed to shipping and the isolation of US forces in Iraq, if any, and Kuwait from supply and naval support. This variant is somewhat unstable and leads either to war with Iran, or withdrawal from Iraq, Kuwait and the Gulf because of lack of supply.

Scenario 4a: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, Stay in Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US stays in Iraq and Afghanistan. Travel from Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq to West is not allowed. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4b: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, leave Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US leaves Iraq but stays in Afghanistan. Pakistan and Iran are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Iraq is a weak base of terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4a and 4b are logical and in our interest. Therefore they are scored as bigoted and racist and not possible by the MSM and Left.

Diagnosis: West is at war with Islam and won’t admit it. West is at war, demographically, with third world and won’t admit it. The mistakes in the Middle East are just more of the same as the last 50 years of 3rd world immigration. This demographic conflict is, in part, the West’s own making by its own expansion of the third world population bubble.

Senator John Warner has advocated changing Maliki and starting some withdrawal of US forces from Iraq. This is because Bush focuses on Iraq and won’t think about the rest. We have no rational policy. That leaves us in the Iraq irrationality that comes from Bush’s brain.

The following comment was posted at Raw Story and they pulled the entire thread.

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer
Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

If we do a missile strike on Iran, we have to pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf because of their antiship missiles. But then they can never go back in. We then can’t supply Iraq or even Kuwait. So we have to withdrawal completely from the Persian Gulf and abandon Kuwait and the Iraqi, Kuwaiti, and Saudi oil fields to Iran. This is actually worse than Saddam’s plan to take them.

The US is in paralysis because its in reality denial. We are in a war with Islam and the Middle East. They are at war with us. We are losing that war, primarily by immigration. We are going extinct from third world immigration as a mathematical theorem. We are unable to admit reality and so we can’t act on it.

We have allowed Pakistan to effectively extort money from us by the terrorism they have permitted since 1998 after they did their nuclear test. Pakistan had 38 billion in foreign debt on 9-11, with its interest greater than gross exports as its central banker wrote in a book. We let them extort money from us and they still are. We have to prevent Iran from getting nukes and denuke Pakistan.

Pakistan treats us with contempt because we have troops in Afghanistan but no ground supply route. The only way to get one is to invade Iran and position our forces on the border of Pakistan. Then we can, with India, surround and blockade Pakistan.

Instead, we are allowing pipeline deals through Pakistan to India that will further undermine our bargaining power. We allow arranged marriages from Pakistan and Afghanistan to people in the US as family reunification. We allow free movement to some terrorists from the Middle East to the West. We allow them on planes. We did so half-knowingly, in part, before 9-11.

We are fools. We deny reality. We deny our own biology. We think we can conquer death and the physical world by machines and know-how. Our entire lives have become a denial of reality. That is why our policies make no sense.

=

Senator Barack Obama advocates, in effect, our having a monthly casualty rate in Afghanistan pumped up by a nuclear Iran and nuclear Pakistan. This is now the consensus choice of the MSM and US establishment. They support continued appeasement and tribute to Pakistan. They support continued free access to the West by the Muslim world. They support our demographic suicide by immigration, and that’s a mathematical theorem, published in genetics journals.

See the Population Genetics, Wright Island Model, One Way Migration, and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

== Senator Hillary Clinton

Senator Clinton advocates something close to what Barack Obama advocates. She, like Obama, voted for the Bush Kennedy, McCain amnesty.

Senator John McCain is almost out of the race, because he advocated the same irrational mix Bush did, immigration and war. Obama and Clinton advocate that irrational mix as well. Almost every candidate does, except Tom Tancredo and a few others. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are antiwar, so they don’t advocate the full mix. Duncan Hunter is close to Tom Tancredo.

All major candidates, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Rudi Giuliani, Fred Thompson advocate war with at least one Muslim land, appeasement of the others, and allowing the Muslim lands to colonize us by immigration and for their young men here to kill us here.

Reality catches up with presidents, as Bush’s presidency shows. Advocating the irrational makes no sense. Now its in the open that both parties and all major candidates and the MSM are advocating inconsistent irrational policies guaranteed to fail.

The job is for the people to point this out in detail, in writing, on talk radio, in letters, faxes, phone calls, town meetings and other contacts with Congress, the executive, the MSM, etc.

We as voters have to know the facts, numbers, history, theory, etc. better than those we vote for, and then explain to them that their wrong statements are wrong and they aren’t good enough. We have to explain that to the MSM. It takes a village to teach our politicians, MSM, profs, etc. common sense, and rational decision making under uncertainty and under biology. These are things the MSM and elites would rather have us die from than be forced to admit they don’t know how to do it or are too lazy to.

We have to learn the numbers, history, facts, theory, etc. We have to put it together on the internet and elsewhere. We then have to force it down the throat of the MSM, Congress, President, and other elites including Wall Street.

==Iran and Pakistan are our Front line enemies.

We are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan in insurgencies funded and supported by Iran and Pakistan. Al Qaeda doesn’t come from the sky. They are supplied out of Pakistan and other insurgents are supported out of Iran or Saudi Arabia.

We can’t win insurgencies in the back countries of Iraq and Afghanistan while the frontline countries of Iran and Pakistan supply the insurgents and block us from effective action. We need to do a ground invasion now of Iran while its non-nuclear. Then we isolate Pakistan by surrounding it and blockading it.

Pakistan is not strong economically or financially. Pakistan without foreign aid or assistance or trade is not viable as the political entity it is. It will have to negotiate or face break up. We have to insist on our own removal and our own inspections of nuclear weapons.

As a surrounded and isolated country, Pakistan will not be able to maintain or develop its nuclear arsenal. Nuclear weapons decay, so will Pakistan’s. They will wilt, if we have the will to surround them and isolate them physically. That would also mean no arranged marriages from Pakistan to the West as part of family reunification.
==Appendix

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer

Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

Thread now gone:

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/36593.html

This was about John Bolton’s call for attacking Iran.

“We see the English as our enemy since the time of the Prophet Mohammed.”

October 27, 2006

Last Updated: Thursday, 26 October 2006, 10:01 GMT 11:01 UK

E-mail this to a friend Printable version

Tories criticise BBC over Taleban

The BBC has been criticised by the Conservative Party after it broadcast an interview with a Taleban spokesman.

begin quote

In the film, broadcast on Wednesday, a Taleban fighter who gave his name as Mullah Assad Akhond said: “We see the English as our enemy since the time of the Prophet Mohammed. They are our enemies now and they were then.

“We will fight them to our death. We will not let them into our country. They can’t deceive us about their propaganda that they are here for reconstruction or rebuilding this country.”

end quotation

This is the view in Saudi Arabia that funds them and in Pakistan that trains and aids them. This is the view in Iran. The time to fight them is when it costs us 200 battle phase deaths, as in Iraq, not when its 50,000 killed like Vietnam.

We still have Vietnam syndrome.

Afghanistan and Iraq are like two meaningless islands in the Pacific. Its time to Island hop to the mainland of what is attacking us and wants to destroy us, Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia.

The real racism is to think that they can’t beat us. They are beating us by immigration, terrorism, and propaganda, just what this guy said. They attacked the Eastern Roman Empire in 633, i.e. the West. They want to kill and enslave Christians, Jews, Hindus, and secular people.

They hate the liberals and the left and want to destroy them and will when the left let them. The left glorify their struggle from 633 AD on and praise very victory of theirs and every defeat of ours.

This article is opinion, hypotheses and speculation. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: