Archive for the 'Baker Hamilton Iraq Commission' Category

Blair Bush Dec 7, 2006 News Conference

December 7, 2006

Blair: “perverted view of Islam.” Who has that perverted view? Muhammed had those perverted views? Did the Caliphs who authorized the final version of the Koran? Then they had all other copies destroyed.

Was Muhammed the one who hijacked Islam? Was it the Caliphs? Was the attack of Islam on the Eastern Roman Empire in 633 AD a perversion of Islam?

The Koran was written down after 633 A.D. under the authority of the Caliph. Didn’t the Caliphate authorized version of the Koran justify everything the Caliphate had done, was doing and wanted to do?

So the Koran was written at the height of the age of perversion of Islam? The Koran was written in final form by the hijackers? They were occupying Damascus, Jerusalem, and so on at the time the Koran was finalized in written form.

Wasn’t it the Eastern Roman Empire that was hijacked not Islam? The hostage takers wrote down the Koran in final form and destroyed all other copies. They did it during the hostage taking.

After taking cities like Damascus, they sold the Christians into slavery, after raping them. Their standard was 3 days of looting and raping followed by selling the Christians and Jews as slaves.

This was done before, during and after the writing of the Koran. The Koran was written under the authority of the Caliphate to justify this. So the Koran justifies this looting and raping of Christians and Jews. This was during the hijacking and hostage taking.

Piracy, slavery, hostage taking, ransom have been part of Islam’s relation to the West from 622 A.D. to the present time. That is standard Islam. That is the entire history of Islam from then to now. The hostage takers were in charge when the Koran was finalized in written form. They authorized the final version, the version that exists today. It justifies what they were doing then and had done and have done since then.

When did Islam change from the Caliphate? Which attack on the West was not part of Islam? Did the Caliphs hijack Islam from Muhammed? Then they had control of the final written version of the Koran after the hijacking?

So the Caliphs had the Koran in its final written form embed the hijacking? So the Koran is not the teachings of Muhammed, but of the hijackers, the Caliphs? The Koran says its it, the whole thing. So that was false?

The current version of the Koran is a false book, created by Caliphs who hijacked Islam? What they wrote about Muhammed in the Koran, hadith, etc. is fabricated to justify their attack on the West?

–Bush: The New Course.

Stay the course. Change the course. Stay the new course.

This was always the course. We knew this from the beginning. The course never changed. Stay the course.

–Blair releasing money to Palestinians.

Hamas and Fatah are becoming more extreme not less?

This article represents hypotheses, speculation or opinion. Any part of it that gives offense to any person or faith should be considered restated or reinterpreted to avoid that offense. All other disclaimers apply.


Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group: The Goal Thing

December 7, 2006

The Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group Report states the goal as:

Paragraph #150 (on page 57)

39 A s s e s s m e n t D. Achieving Our Goals We agree with the goal of U.S. policy in Iraq, as stated by the President: an Iraq that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.” In our view, this definition entails an Iraq with a broadly representative government that maintains its territorial integrity, is at peace with its neighbors, denies terrorism a sanctuary, and doesn’t brutalize its own people. Given the current situation in Iraq, achieving this goal will require much time and will depend primarily on the actions of the Iraqi people.

Vivisimo Clustering: Goal

an Iraq that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.”

This is not a goal for us. Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Russia and China all satisfy that goal, but they all act at times against us.

Let’s try substituting the word Islam for Iraq:

an Islam that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.”

an Islamic Republic that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.”

Consider this different goal:

A Secular Republic that abolishes religious law and courts and gives equal rights to Christian, secular and other minorities, that does not export violence, does not threaten its neighbors, and that does not possess or seek weapons of mass destruction.

This goal has already failed because Iraq is an Islamic Republic. Why should American soldiers die in Iraq and Afghanistan to uphold the decisions of Islamic courts and judges? Why did U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad agree to Islamic Republics in both places?

We didn’t agree to a Fascist Republic in Germany? We fought in Japan to change the role of the emperor because we thought it would make a wasted sacrifice of the lives of our soldiers not to. Why didn’t that apply in Iraq and Afganistan?

How about, America:

an America that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.”

a West that can “govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself.”

What would defending America or the West mean? It would mean no nukes for Iran. It would mean no immigration into the West.

How about this modified goal:

A region of Secular Republics or Kingdoms that abolishes religious law and courts and gives equal rights to Christian, secular and other minorities, that does not export violence, does not threaten its neighbors, and that does not possess or seek weapons of mass destruction.

Search on goals

Paragraph #19 (on page 15)

The United States cannot achieve its goals in the Middle East unless it deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict and regional instability. There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the United States to a comprehensive ArabIsraeli peace on all fronts: Lebanon, Syria, and President Bush’s June 2002 commitment to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. This commitment must include direct talks with, by, and between Israel, Lebanon, Palestinians (those who accept Israel’s right to exist), and Syria.

Everyone is entitled to their view of the root cause of conflict. Is Israel really the problem (see Ralph Peters on this)?

The Ottoman Empire was engaged in genocide of Christians from the 1890’s onwards. They still discriminate against them. This has gone on continually from the 1890’s to now.

This was not because of Israel. The genocide of Christians by the Ottoman Empire was not caused by Israel. So even in the 20th century, the attack on Christians by the Caliphate predates Israel. The genocide of Christians by the Caliphate can’t be traced to Israel, and neither can the Muslim immigration into the West that has made it its goal to establish Sharia law in Europe and America.

It seems they know their goal. Their goal is to use immigration, Dhimmi PC, Marxist self hate, apology, etc. to infiltrate and take over our lands. Their aim, as stated from the beginning clearly, is a world under Islamic law and rule. The Baker Hamilton study group clearly either never studied this, or rejects it.

Is Islam at war with the West? It says it is. Its history shows it has been continually from 622 AD to the present. Islam has never been at peace with the non-Muslim world, which it defines as the House of War. There has never a century without Muslim attacks, atrocity, piracy, discrimination or enslavement of non-Muslims.

How do we know that Islam is at war with the West? Because it says so. Its declared war in the name of Islam in every century from the 7th to the present. Bin Laden is only one in a long line of affirming and reaffirming this war of Islam on the West. They know their goal and have made it clear, our subjugation or death.

Search on goal

Paragraph #219 (on page 72)

4. The Wider Regional Context The United States will not be able to achieve its goals in the Middle East unless the United States deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict.


Why not Pakistan’s nuclear weapons? Why not Iran’s nuclear program? Why aren’t these the wider regional context? They are missing from the section titled, “The Wider Regional Context”.

They rejected more troops, because they were not available in their view.

Paragraph #298 (on page 91)

Because of the importance of Iraq to our regional security goals and to our ongoing fight against al Qaeda, we considered proposals to make a substantial increase (100,000 to 200,000) in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. We rejected this course because we do not believe that the needed levels are available for a sustained deployment. Further, adding more American troops could conceivably worsen those aspects of the security problem that are fed by the view that the U.S. presence is intended to be a long-term “occupation.” We could, however, support a short-term redeployment or surge of American combat forces to stabilize Baghdad, or to speed up the training and equipping mission, if the U.S. commander in Iraq determines that such steps would be effective.

Modified version:

Because of the importance of Nucleaer Weapons to blowing us up and to our regional security goals and to our ongoing fight against al Qaeda, we considered proposals to denuke Iran and Pakistan. This might include a substantial increase (100,000 to 200,000) in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq, Iran, or Pakistan. We rejected this course because we weren’t asked to think about it and we do not believe that the needed levels are available for a sustained deployment.

Cluster/search on regional

The Iraq Study Group Report recommends limiting aid to Iraq if they don’t meet timelines. Why not limit Baker Botts fees from pipeline deals or defending Saudi Arabia? If Saudi support of insurgents in Iraq or Afghanistan doesn’t stop within 6 months, Baker Botts can’t take any more fees from Saudi Arabia. If Pakistan doesn’t stop supporting the Taliban or give up bin Laden within 6 months, Baker Botts can’t take any more pipeline deal fees.

This article represents hypotheses, speculation or opinion. All other disclaimers apply.


Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group Fallacies

December 6, 2006

The Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group has based their analysis on a number of fallacies. Some of these were in the Gingrich article at Front Page Mag.

Fallacy: Iraq can be analysed by itself

Iraq is a war by itself, not part of a regional war.

Fallacy: Iran and Syria part of the solution.

Baker Hamilton treat enemy countries, Iran and Syria as part of the solution, not part of the war.

This is like invading France in 1944 at Normandy and asking Germany to help end the insurgency.

Fallacy: Ignoring Islam

Islam is the problem. Baker Hamilton ignore this.

Mistake: Maliki is a friend.

al Maliki is an enemy, as is the government of Iraq.

Fallacy: Islamic Republic can be pro-Western
Islamic Republics are anti-American. By creating Islamic Republics in Iraq and Afghanistan we created enemies. We are dying to strengthen enemies.

Iraq Army could turn on us?

The Iraq army if it gets strong enough will stab us in the back. The fallacy is to spend our resources to make a hostile army stronger in the name of stability.

Stable Iraq can build nukes?

A stable Iraq can be a more effective enemy. They already are an enemy, except for the Kurds.

Don’t help Christians and Kurds.

This is a standard Jim Baker mistake. Baker betrayed the Christians in Lebanon to Syria during the Iraq war.

Leaving embeds in a hosilte army?

We can’t leave embeds in an enemy army, a fallacious conclusion of the Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group.

Golan Heights Giveaway?

Israel is an ally. They propose giving the Golan Heights back to Syria. Syria is an enemy country. This is like giving France back to Germany in 1944.

When did giving back the Golan Heights become part of their mandate?

Fallacy: Israel is the problem.

Turkey started genocide of Christians in the 1890’s, before Israel was founded in 1947. Islam is the problem. Demographics are the problem. Their immigration here is the problem. Disloyalty and self-interest of our leaders is the problem. PC Leftist Marxist self-hate is the problem, especially when used by self-interested “leaders”.

Holding Ground v. Holding onto an Enemy?

Like Patton said, don’t hold ground, hold onto the enemy. The enemy right now is Iran. Hold on to them and finish them.

Invading Iran, they assume we won’t.

BH said if we withdraw, Iran and Syria will invade Iraq. Iran won’t invade Iraq if its busy being invaded by us.

Immigration to US brings in enemies?

We have to stop all immigration to the US. We can’t have people coming from enemy countries who believe in an enemy ideology of our destruction coming here.

That includes Communist Chinese grad students as well as grad students from Russia. Both are enemy countries that see themselves as our adversary.

Don’t Fight wars when killed are 200?

The time to fight wars is when battle phase deaths are 200 per war, or even 2000.

Ignore need for Iranian regime change

We need to remove the Iranian regime that is hostile to us and prevents a solution in Iraq.

We need to apply Weed and Seed in Iran. Weed and seed is remove what’s bad, seed what’s good and see what grows. If its a weed, remove it.

Ignore Iran’s missiles, subs and nuclear program.

We need to remove Iran’s missile, sub, and nuclear program. We can’t let Iran put nukes on missiles on subs and have them off our shores or sell them to North Korea or Pakistan. The time to defeat them is now.

We have Iran surrounded on 3 sides. Saddam didn’t. We have air and naval power, Saddam didn’t. We have a better military than Saddam or Iran in the 1980’s or what they have now.

Give up bases to invade Iran from?
We should not retreat from Iraq and give up our bases to attack Iran. We lose more dead from retaking this ground around Iran than attacking now.

If Iran defends forward, we defeat it from our bases, if back, we can defeat it piecemeal. If it defends back, it loses missile and sub bases to threaten our ships.

Our biggest potential loss in a war with Iran is a missile or sub that sinks a carrier. So we want to use our ground troops to remove missiles in range of our ships and subs. Air power will get most but not all of their missiles.

Pakistan nukes, subs, missiles.

Pakistan has nukes, subs and missiles and is intending to combine them. They have a sub shipyard the French built for them. They have a new nuclear reactor coming on line that will help them build many minaturized warheads that will fit on missiles on subs.

Risks in Iran Invasion made worse

Attacking Iran from the ground from Iraq is less risky than using ships. Big ships can be sunk by Iran’s missiles or subs. We want to move our ships back and use ground forces because its lower risk and lower cost. To do that, we need bases in Iraq.

The BH group wants us to lower our ground forces and remove our combat units from Iraq. That will let Iran attack them. It also doesn’t let us attack Iran during a rotation when we double up combat units in Iraq. That means we lose surprise.

Delay makes Iran and Pakistan problems worse and solutions more costly and risky.

Surround and Blockade Pakistan

We must surround and blockade Pakistan to force it to give up its subs, missiles and nukes. If that fails, we must invade it. We need to surround it to minimize casualties.

We need bases in Iraq to invade Iran at lower cost. We need to invade Iran to surround Pakistan. We need to surround and blockade Pakistan to make it give up its nukes without fighting a war.

We have wasted time after 9-11

We have wasted time. We should have won the whole war starting after 9-11 by the end of 2003. That should have included Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah, Afghanistan, Hamas, and North Korea. We have acted as if we had time, when we don’t.

Our know-how is going to China, Iran, Pakistan

Our military advantage is eroded by Chinese grad students and H1B’s and Indian and other nationals who give our technology and know-how to China, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, etc.

We have to teach our people math and science in our grad schools, and not the people of any other country at all. We need to employ our people in our country, and not the people of any other country at all. We need to give our young adults economic and job security so they can get married, have kids and stay married. That means ending immigration.

Islam at war with West using immigration

Islam is at war with us using immigration and population demographics. We are losing that war. Islam is conquering Europe and Russia by these means. We must get Europe to stop immigration and to keep Turkey out of Europe.

Islam’s history is war with West

We have to look at history. We have to stop the PC idea that we are the problem of history and return to the idea of our forbears that Islam is the problem. We need leaders on our side, not on the side of their own pipeline deals.

Lee Hamilton lied about Saudi Pak role in 9-11

We don’t need a Lee Hamilton who lies about the role of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and then to cover up his lies pretends that Iraq is a problem by itself instead of part of a wider war, a war he covered up.

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia attacked us on 9-11 through proxies. They are supporting the insurgencies against us in Iraq and Afghanistan. So is Iran. All 3 countries are at war with us. They are the main enemy homelands. We must defeat all 3.

Baker Hamilton, Baker Kean, Nawaf Obaid, Prince Turki al-Faisal, President Bush in defending Saudi Arabia and Prince Bandar are part of the same disinformation machine working against us.

We need to exclude Muslims from our military, Congress, weapons lab, etc. We must keep Muslims from getting access to Russian, British, French or US nukes. We need to stop their immigration or even visiting our country.

After Pearl Harbor, Immigration stopped.

After Pearl Harbor was attacked, immigration and tourism from Japan and Germany was completely halted. That is what happens in war. Nor did we have Chinese grad students occupy our physics departments and weapons labs, with some exceptions like C. S. Wu, who may have been a spy, other Chinese in the West during WWII later returned to China and built their bombs including Huanwu Peng.

History teaches that countries that continue immigration and tourism from hostile lands during war and after they are caught attacking us from within and stealing our know-how don’t survive. We are a feckless country.

Is it better to bomb Iraq than to stop immigration home? Bush says we have to fight them there so that we don’t have to fight them here. If they can’t come here, they can’t kill us here. Why don’t we stop immigration? Why is it better to kill them in their own lands than stop them coming to our lands?

–America had survival instinct after Dec 7, 1941

America stopped all immigration. It stopped tourism and student visas. Only Americans were taught Ph.D. level physics. Now its the opposite.

The people of that time had a survival instinct for themselves, their children and their country. It was their and their children’s country then and forever. They took it seriously and took their children’s future seriously. They had courage to face up to reality and do what it took to win.

They said the truth. They didn’t say fascism is the religion of peace. They defeated fascism. They didn’t set up fascist republics, courts and laws, they abolished them. They didn’t praise what attacked them, they destroyed it, utterly and completely for all time.

They removed it from the planet so that it could never harm any human being, in their own time or any time to come. They thought not just of themselves, but of generations to come. They did what had to be done.

Leaders want to coverup their betrayal

Our leaders are interested in covering up their mistakes and complicity in our problems, especially in the immigration of the last 40 years that allowed 9-11 and led to our know in night vision and stealth ending up with China.

Time to win is short, invade Iran now

We need to rapidly defeat our enemies before our know-how transferred to China is sold to Iran and Pakistan and used against us.

We are at war, but act like we are not only at peace, but that all the world is already united as one people. We have PC lies broadcast from our media that blame us and undermine our loyalty to ourselves. Our leaders do this for personal advantage and to lie about having betrayed us already. Baker Hamilton are part of that.

Baker Botts Saudi Arabia’s lawyer

Baker Botts is defending Saudi Arabia, a country that Lee Hamilton lied about not having financed the 9-11 attacks against us.

BH study group has covered up Saudi Arabia and Iran’s role in supporting the insurgency against us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Baker Botts law firm has pipeline deals in the Middle East and Central Asia. James A. Baker IV, the son of James A. Baker III is head of the Washington Office of Baker Botts and part of those pipeline deals.

Prince Bandar has boasted on US TV that he pays people when they leave government and this makes them look at things his way while in government.

The West has the most disloyal leaders in recorded history. The elites in the West have an ideology of hatred of the West and of the middle classes.

Baker Hamiton Botts Bush are more loyal to the elites of our enemies than to our middle class. We have enemies within like the communists in WWII. Like FDR then, our leaders lie about it now.

We have already been attacked from within

Unlike Pearl Harbor, we were attacked from within, not once but multiple times. Our enemies organize in our homeland and use our own courts against us.

After Pearl Harbor, when attacked from without by Imperial Japanese Navy, we interned Japanese. After 9-11 when attacked from within by Muslims, we didn’t intern Muslims or even stop immigration. We got it wrong both times?

Americans during WWII believed in themselves. They wanted to live and though they had an unconditional right to live. Our leaders thought that and were loyal.

Americans believed during WWII that they were fighting to keep this land for themselves and their children forever. They believed this land belonged to them to the exclusion of all others forever. Owning land means excluding others from its enjoyment. They believed they owned this land in that sense and their children would forever.

Ask your politician if he believes the people of this country and their children own this land to the exclusion of all other people forever? Ask them at every opportunity.

Why is killing over 100,000 Iraqis by some counts thinkable and moral, but stopping immigration or deporting those who attack us from within unthinkable? When will worse become not just thinkable but necessary?

Look at what they have done to their lands before coming here? Look at Iraq, Lebanon, the West Bank, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. What do they do when they come here? They call us racist. They call us names.

They say one thing in English and another thing in their own language. Why is it unthinkable to send them back, but thinkable to bomb their relatives who are still there? Why do we have to bomb their relatives there so they won’t kill us here?

Does that even make sense? Doesn’t bombing their relatives there make them more likely to kill us here? Isn’t that what happened in 1993 at WTC and in 2001 at WTC and the Pentagon?

Didn’t the MSM lie about this after the WTC 1993 attack? Didn’t the MSM say the Republicans were bigots including Pat Buchanan at the 1996 Republican convention to want to slow down immigration?

Didn’t all 19 hijackers come after the 1996 Republican convention? Didn’t the MSM lie on 9-11? Didn’t they call us bigots pre-emptively for wanting to stop immigration?

Didn’t Norman Mineta on 9-12 say he was against profiling to cover up that he was responsible for 3000 people being killed? Didn’t we find out later he had had warnings before 9-11 that he didn’t tell us about on 9-12 when he said no profiling. He was told in advance of the risk, as was Bush and as was Rice. They all did nothing and then after 9-11, lied to us when they said they had no warning and no idea.

If they lied about that, aren’ they lying about immigration? They kill over 100,000 Muslims and say its to keep their relatives here from killing us. But the Muslims here have already attacked us from within. How can killing Muslims there make us safer from Muslims here?

If they can’t deport them, why can’t they stop immigration from the very lands where our troops are being killed or that are supporting it? Saudi Arabia is supplying men, money and arms to the insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan to kill Americans. Why do we have 15,000 Saudi students coming here? Isn’t everything that Bush and the MSM say a lie?

When America is a Lebanon, Iraq, or even a Denmark, France, or Netherlands won’t we have to do worse? When the civil war is on us, won’t we have to do and suffer far worse then? Why can’t we face reality now?

Our ancestors in WWII faced up to what had to be done. They did what it took to protect their land, their children, and their grand children. They didn’t tell themselves PC lies that they were responsible for everything that is wrong.

The MSM repeat Manuel II’s words but turn them on the West.

Show me just what the West brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as its command to stop immigration by the authentic indigenous people of Denmark, England, France, and America, i.e. Muslims from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, whose ancestors never came from there.[2]

If we don’t want to deport or do worse later, had we not better stop immigration now? Aren’t the MSM and our leaders lying about immigration now to cover up for their past betrayals since 1965? Aren’t they making it worse later to cover up for the past now?

If we hope to assimilate those here, instead of fighting them, shouldn’t we stop immigration now? Which is kinder? Its the truth that the MSM hate. They were responsible for the deaths on 9-11 by their calling Pat Buchanan a bigot at the 1996 Republican Convention.

On 9-11, Peter Jennings and the others couldn’t admit that Pat Buchanan was right in 1996 at the Republican Convention and they were wrong to call him a bigot. Almost 3,000 people died on 9-11 because they made the wrong call in 1996. Thousands have died since in Iraq because of their mistake. They can’t admit they all died because they called Pat Buchanan a bigot in 1996.

Because if they were wrong then, their motives must have been their own bigotry and anti-Americanism. They must have intended immigration all along to take our job, physical and speech security. To admit that is to let us blame them and to give up their strategy. They still want to take away our job, physical and speech security.

That includes Bush after 9-11. He wanted to keep us fearful because he was warned before 9-11. He lied to us then and he is still lying. All the deaths are his fault. He lies to keep from admitting that.

Things will only get worse while we listen to the lies of the MSM. A country can become Lebanon or Iraq or the West Bank. Those lands were better than they were now. But high birth rates by the people in those lands made them unlivable. Those high birth rates caused the most extreme interpretation of Islam to become the norm.

In the 1960’s, women did not walk covered in Lebanon or Iraq or the West Bank. Now they walk that way even in London and America. What does that tell us will happen next here?

If their birth rates caused their lands to become unlivable, what will they do in our lands? When do we speak up for our own survival? Now or when its too late? What will they do to us when they have the power? What they are doing now?

The issue of whether to stop immigration or to deport those who attack us from within or support those who do is an empirical question. The PC MSM make it sound like a moral issue of black and white. To let ourselves be turned into a Baghdad situation is not moral. To let our land become a land of terror and war is not moral.

Moreover, earth’s sustainable population is far below its current population, perhaps 1 billion. If America and Europe became war zones, then earth will miss its chance to reverse with technology the environmental problems. In that case, the human population may go down to 50 million or even zero.

We have an obligation to maintain the human species. This may be the only intelligent species in the universe.

The universe may be wasted if we die out. This may be the only universe. This may be the last best hope of intelligent life in the universe. We can’t let it be turned into a war zone by a PC elite that denies the evidence of buildings burning behind them as they say immigration is not the problem.

Everyone who died has done so for immigration.

Every person who died on 9-11 2001 or in WTC 1993 or in Iraq or Afghanistan, whether Muslim or not, died for immigration. Every person put in prison, every person detained, every person tortured, whether in Iraq or Gitmo or some secret prison sufferred for immigration.

Every person who has been afraid, been searched, been delayed, been subjected to indignity, been offended, can trace that to immigration.

Take away the 1965 Immigration Act and none of it would have happened. There would be no Gitmo. There would be no extraordinary renditions. There would have been no waterboarding. There would have been no Abu Ghraib. There would be no bombing. None of it would have happened.

We keep Gitmo open today to keep immigration going into the future. We have secret prisons to keep immigration going into the future. We have troops in Iraq to keep immigration going into the future. Every death, every maiming, every sacrifice is for immigration.

Teddy Kennedy and the others in 1965 lied about the reasons for the 1965 Immigration Act. They said it wasn’t to change the racial make up, when it explicitly said it was. They lied about it then and their motives. Immigration has always been a lie.

Immigration is a lie today. Immigration is about lies. Everyone being detained in Gitmo today is there for immigration. Everyone dying in Iraq today is dying for immigration.

More people will die with certainty because of what has happened. Our night vision and stealth technology have been stolen by China by immigration.

Middle class job security has been taken by immigration. Good working class jobs with good wages, benefits and job security no longer exist because of immigration. They once were regarded as a right.

Men’s median wages are no higher today in the US than in 1973. This is the intended outcome of the 1965 Immigration Act, and every pro-immigration vote since then. Senators take money for this. Nancy Pelosi has illegals work her vineyards outside San Francisco and she voted against requiring employers of illegals to pay for their hospital costs.

Congress lies about immigration. The Democratic Party is a lie. It says its for the little guy, the poor, the working class and the middle class but they are in fact totally against them. What has taken away the Archie Bunker homestead is the 1965 Immigration Act of the Democratic Party. The truth is they hate Archie Bunker and to get him have hit every middle class and working class person in America.

The intended result of immigration was to take away job security, physical security and speech security. Its accomplished that. All the people who died on 9-11, died and their deaths lied about to cover up that Pat Buchanan was right in 1996 to want to stop immigration completely.

Everything that Bush, McCain, George Will, William Kristol, the 9-11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Jim Baker, the Iraq Study Group, the Senate, Nancy Pelosi say about all this is a lie. They are covering up their own immigration policies as the root cause of what happened on 9-11 and since then.

Iraq was flip side of Dec 7, 1941 reaction.

On Dec 7, 1941, we were attacked by a foreign navy. We responded by internment and cutting off immigration and then went after them. Even before they were defeated, we relaxed the internment.

On Sep 11, 2001, we were attacked from inside. We didn’t do internment or even slow down immigration, tourism or student visas, even from the countries that attacked us or supported the attack.

Instead, we attacked a country outside ours that didn’t even support the 9-11 attacks. Bush said we had to fight them in Iraq so that Saudis, Pakistanis, etc. wouldn’t fight us here. But he still kept them coming here.

Irrationality and lies not security

Those who deny reality are not interested in our security but their own short term security. Bush and the establishment were covering up their lies about immigration and intentionally causing more deaths here to cover up for their lies. We know they were warned before 9-11, and chose not to warn us.

It was for the same reason. They wouldn’t admit before 9-11 that immigrants were a risk. There would have been a manhunt for the immigrants, which would have led to the question of why they were here.

So their lies led to our deaths. Then they took away our civil rights. So their lies led to our losing our physical and legal security. They also have taken away our job security. Men’s median wages are below what they were in 1973. They lie about immigration’s role in that and try to hide that it happened. Democrats say they are for the poor when they are against them.

You don’t get security from those who lie about the causes of 9-11. They lied before, during and after it. They still are covering up Saudi and Pakistani involvement many believe.

Irrationality and lies are not security. They lead to worse actual outcomes and even bigger lies. Countries can fall apart and become combat zones. Look at Lebanon and Iraq over the last 50 years.

This is now happening here. The real racism is to think we are different. The real racism is to think that we can change the people and give up homogeneity and not have the wars that come from diversity. The real racism is to think diversity causes wars there but won’t here.

Irrationality and lies are not the basis of security. Retirement financial and physical security is not built on lies. It will be far worse than we can let ourselves believe. We see what it will be in Lebanon and Iraq today. That is the future immigration brings us.

That is what the Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group should have said. They should have said, whatever can be said about Iraq, we have to stop immigration so that it doesn’t happen here.

If they can’t stop diversity killing there with our army there, why should we believe they can stop it here? Do we want our army in our lives? Do we want checkpoints like in Baghdad and the West Bank and Gaza?

The MSM elite will get special treatment, as will Congress. We won’t be able to take sick children to the doctor or hospital, get to work, buy groceries or even have electricity and water. They will laugh at us and lie to us just as they do now.

Future in America will be worse with certainty

If they lie about the past, won’t they lie about the future? The intended result of immigration is to take away job, physical and speech security. So it will.

What will happen in the future will be far worse than 9-11. Suicide bombing will come. That’s what 9-11 was. Its going to come as a norm. Fatwa’s will be prepared and given to order it.
Not mobilized our military

We have not moblized our military to deal with the threats because Bush Sr. lost the 1992 election after his no new taxes pledge. We get no truth from our government.

The first Bush administration used fear to cover up a multitude of crimes after taking office and likely many before.

We are infiltrated

Our society is infiltrated in universities, MSM, Wall Street, defense industries, Silicon valley, etc. by foreign nationals from hostile countries. They gather kompromat and blackmail and bribe our elites to be against us.

Deindustrialization after 9-11 in time of war

After being attacked on 9-11, we have sold companies to foreign countries, invested outside the US, continued low cost imports, seen our automobile companies verge on bankruptcy, invested in a housing boom instead of the weapons and energy independence we need. We have sent our know-how overseas and brought others to our shores to displace and substitute for our own people to learn science, math, engineering, computers and technology.

Our information of all types has been sent outside the country and foreigners brought here, often from hostile lands like Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, etc. to have control of it.

The education, recommendation letters, promotion, admissions, hiring, etc. of Americans is controlled by foreigners from hostile lands including Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, etc. They openly discriminate and make racist comments about the inferiority and laziness of Americans.

MSM, Profs, Govt are Enemy Propaganda Machine

We have abandoned ourselves, our dignity, all sense of loyalty and reason. The truth is told by a few and they are called racists and bigots, even in time of war.

On and after 9-11, the MSM, President, Norman Mineta, praise our enemies ideology and religion, and attack as bigots those who want to stop immigration and tourism into our country at time of war. Our night vision and stealth technology have been taken since then. Our night vision is used by insurgents to kill and maim our troops and our leaders, MSM, profs, etc. say its bigotry to want to stop that and support our troops by keeping it here.

Stop Immigration, Know-how transfer, Self-hate in wartime

The way to do that is to stop immigration, tourism, student visas to our land during time of war. Yet our MSM, profs, leaders, etc. all say that is bigotry. They say to be for ourselves in time of war is bigotry. Their concepts are leftist concepts created by the Soviet Union and Marx to defeat us. They have combined the 19th century anti Western concepts of Marx as an enemy ideology within with Islam as another enemy ideology within. They have made Muslims the highest birth rate group in our society, and say its bigotry to stop their immigration. They are choosing death and say its not. This reflects Marxist hate of the West that is taught in K-12, colleges, and by the MSM and political leaders.

The Commission parrot the same lies and hate. We have few leaders who are for us, and they are called nativists and bigots. We are losing the immigration, demographic and birth rate conflict and the MSM praise it. They fund a third world population bubble that is causing a mass extinction of species. Then they push immigration that makes it worse.

Earth’s population above sustainable level

Earth’s population is far above its sustainable level, i.e. the level that doesn’t cause more species to go extinct than come into existence. The longer this continues, the more species that go extinct, and the lower the sustainable population becomes.

We are on a train to destruction and our leaders ignore it. No one is at the controls of this train as it heads towards desruction. No one is at the controls but death.

Islam was developed in 622 AD, the Dark Ages. It reflected the scarcity and demographic stress of those times. Some think this was caused by a volcano, but whatever the cause the Dark Ages was a time of population decline and stress.

The 19th century was a time of rapid population growth, and demographic stress. This resulted in the genocide of Christians by the Muslims of the Ottoman Empire that started in the 1890’s and has essentially continued in the successor states of that Empire to the present day.

Resurgent Islam is a reflection of the current demographic stress induced by their high birth rate, just as Marxism was a reflection of demographic stress from high birth rates in the 19th century. The toxic fundamentalist Islam of today, far worse than the 1960’s is a reflection of demographic stress.

Earth is crowded. It is far above its sustainable human population level. There are Volterra Predator Prey equations that govern this. However, in our system of equations, instead of a decline in population of each species in proportion, the supporting species go extinct.

This means the sustainable human population level falls. This continues in proportion to the gap between the current population and the sustainable population. But that gap is increasing, because current population goes up and the sustainable population goes down as species go extinct. This just makes more species go extinct, further driving down the sustainable population.

At some point, the current population must reverse course and then go down faster than the sustainable population if it is to meet the sustainable population before the sustainable population reaches zero.

Islam and Latin Leftism driven by population bubble

Islam and self hate Marxism will only get worse until we reach this equilibrium point. Demographic stress will increase as the sustainable population falls from the mass extinction of species underway. This means that ideologies like Islam and self hate Leftism will get worse.

We see this in the hatred of Latin America for America and Europeans. This hatred has become toxically racist towards non native American groups. This reflects the overpopulation of the Americas. The rhetoric of hate from Hispanic groups and Latin American countries is an expression of the same demographic stress as the change in Islam from the 1960’s to the present.

Both will continue to become more extreme, violent and with greater rhetoric of hatred of Americans and Europeans based on race, religion, etc. The reaction of the elites is to increase current population more, and thus to cause extinction of species and thus lower the sustainable population. This increases the gap of current population minus sustainable population.

That increases the extinction of species, and it increases the rhetoric of hatred from Islam and Latin American leftism. We are getting farther and farther away from the 1950’s breathing spell we had. Our leaders think that is automatic. But in fact, it was an extreme aberration. That was the best time ever for the people of the West. Our leaders do everything possible to move away from that, including immigration and the rest of it.

Immigration to the developed world, increases the use of hydrocarbons and other resources faster than any other action. This then causes extinction of species and degrading of earth’s environment. It is the easiest of the bad policies are leaders follow to stop. We must stop immigration totally.

Remover nukes from lands of demographic stress

We must remove all nukes from places of demographic stress, Pakistan, North Korea and incipiently Iran. While battle phase deaths are 200 or even 20,000 this must be done now. We must restore our military. We must do it all in 2 years, denuke North Korea and Pakistan and remove Iran’s nuclear program.

We delayed after 9-11. Time is against us and running out. Our leaders need a WWII sense of urgency, instead of the peace time rhythms of Congress.

Gap of Population minus Sustainable Population drives Islam, Latin Leftism, anti-Westernism, and regional conflict.

Anti-American and anti Western Islam and Latin American Leftism increase as the gap between current population
and sustainable population increases. These combine with immigration to become doctrines of democide and genocide. The West responds with self-hate and aid which make the population gap larger, thus increasing the anti-Western hate. This will result in the extinction of Western populations followed by a collapse of the World population made worse by that extinction to a very low level.

Other advanced populations, including China and Japan and the elites in other countries will also collapse as this population bubble collapses in an implosion. The means to sustain population will then disintegrate, bringing the population even below the long term sustainable level, if a fully functioning advanced world was operating normally.

Just as Islam contributed to this process in the 7th century by attacking the Western superpower, the Eastern Roman Empire, so it contributes to it today. So does Third World Leftism, which also dominates our own institutes of learning, non-profits, NGO’s, the UN, corporations, and the MSM.

The third world blames the West using the terms at hand, Marxism, anti-colonialism or Islam, because it blames the West for anything that goes wrong. Aids arose because the third world population exceeded the sustainable level. This made the 3rd world human population an incubator of new disease. This was the response of the living biosphere to this cause of mass extinction of species. It was an equilibrium response to return the human population to the sustainable level, the level at which it does not cause extinction of other species. The third world blamed this new disease, caused by its own population bubble on the CIA.

In fact, it was the West by giving food aid, vaccinations, etc. that caused the third world population bubble and thus caused aids. The West stopped all the equilibrium mechanisms for population in the third world. The earth then stepped in with a new restoring force to equilibrium, aids.

Gates and Buffet, Sachs and Bono, travel the world making things worse. Immigration makes it worse by importing this population excess into the first world, and which uses energy at higher rates. The do gooders who travel the third world and want to relieve its misery by Western aid are a force against equilibrium.

Their response is to disrupt the equilibrium mechanism that restores current population to the sustainable population level, the level at which humans don’t cause extinction of other species. The Sachs Bono Buffet Gates types are increasing or maintaining the gap between the current population and the sustainable population.

This increases extinction of species and thus lowers the sustainable population. The result is an increase in the hatred of the third world for the first, and the increase of the hatred of immigrant groups from the third world inside the first world.

The result is an increase in radical Islam or radical Latin American Leftism. These operate inside and outside of the West. They result in rumors and a disconnect between reality and perception. They are the “bacteria of stupidity” spread by the NGO’s, left, World Bank, MSM, profs, rock stars, celebrities, movie stars, etc.

The result of this is war. It is war within the West and from outside. Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, etc. search for nuclear weapons. Unlike the 1950’s, this is at a time of extreme demographic stress. That results in a disconnect between actions and reality. Thus these weapons will be used.

The 1950’s was a time of mathematical analysis of mutual assured destruction between two stable societies. Now we are at a time of an unsustainable population bubble. That causes the third world to operate outside the reality zone. It also causes them to seek a new morality of global conquest and jihad, whether in Islam or Latin American Reconquista Leftism. This will be from within and without.

MAD doesn’t work with demographic stress

Mutual assured destruction doesn’t work when one side is motivated by demographic stress, denial of reality and hate of the West. We can’t rely on MAD because it doesn’t apply to the situation. They view their population as unsustainable and excess themselves. If they trade some of their people for us, they view it as win win.

Equivalents of anti-Americanism will operate in Russia and China. The Litvinenko killing is the sort of madness killing miscalculation that will happen, but on a small scale. Its easier to understand than 9-11, but reflects the same underlying math.

In either case, the result is war, immigration, conflict, hatred, and racism on a toxic level. This is not assimilation. This is war for extinction based on extreme demographic induced hysteria and hatred. There is no reasoning with human populations in the grip of demographic stress and a population bubble. There is only the movement to the most extreme ideologies of hate and the using of all weapons available, including nuclear, birth rate, immigration, discrimination, crime, etc.

As the gap between current population and sustainable population increases, the gap between reality and perception increases as well. The result can only be the piercing of the population bubble in a cataclysmic process of destruction. This will be through and by anti-Western Latin American Leftism, extreme Islam, etc.

This article represents hypotheses, speculation, and opinion. All other disclaimers apply.

Baker Hamilton Munich Study Group Conclusion

December 6, 2006

Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group conclusions are in:
Iran and Syria to take over Iraq

Syria gets Golan Heights

Hezbollah gets Christian Lebanon

Turkey to take over Europe

Hamas gets Israel

Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya get piracy.

Mexico and China to take over US

North Korea to take over South Korea and Japan

Whatever floats along gets Australia and New Zealand

Canada, sells itself out, sorry

Russia is just supposed to kill people sporadically until Muslims control its nukes. Sushi bars are open season for FSB.

And, oh yeah, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia never had anything to do with 9-11 or terrorism before or after 9-11.

Baker Botts gets pipeline deals everywhere.

Nuclear warheads on missiles on subs for all of them. India, Pacific, Atlantic oceans will be full of Jizyah sub flotillas demanding payment. So will the seven seas.

This is called realism.

Working Group members

“The Iraq Study Group is a bipartisan group of prominent Americans supported by four premier institutions. It is led by co-chairs James A. Baker, III, the nation’s 61st Secretary of State and Honorary Chairman of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University, and Lee H. Hamilton, former Congressman and Director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

The other members of the study group include: Lawrence S. Eagleburger, Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., Edwin Meese III , Sandra Day O’Connor, Leon E. Panetta, William J. Perry, Charles S. Robb, and Alan K. Simpson.”

The “four premier institutions” correspond to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse:

Mass extinction of species from 3rd world population bubble funded by Gates Buffet Bono Sachs World Bank etc.



Betrayal of the Middle Class by know-how transfer.

This article represents hypotheses, speculation, opinion and the real realism about our “leaders” aka occupiers.

Get Jim in Here, Pronto!

November 14, 2006

By Michael Kinsley
Tuesday, November 14, 2006; Page A31

“The urgent issue of war and peace in Iraq should be decided by the people we elected, not a commission. If we’d wanted James Baker to run the country, we’d have voted for him.”


The Baker (Botts) Hamilton Iraq Study Group is too deeply linked to Saudi Arabia to have any credibility. James A. Baker III is a Senior Partner in Baker Botts. His son, James A. Baker IV heads the Washington office. Baker Botts is defending Saudi Arabia against a 9-11 lawsuit.

Lee Hamilton said don’t follow the money on 9-11 financing. But Congress had already found them, search on Saudi Arabia 9-11 and see Lee Hamilton has admitted he didn’t question Reagan or Bush Elder when Hamilton ran an Iran Contra investigation. Hamilton said he didn’t ask them because the country couldn’t have another impeachment. Hamilton has admitted he hid information in an investigation to the country when his midwestern straight arrow personality was being relied on to tell the truth.

Hamilton has, to read between the lines, covered up for Saudi Arabia, even after Congress found the links. These are the 27 pages in 2003 that couldn’t be published. The truthout site has a letter with a summary of the information.

Look at James A. Baker IV and III at the Baker Botts webpage. Its full of oil deals in Central Asia, Middle East, and all the countries in the region. They want to do deals with Iran.

They are selling us out, letting Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Iran get away with terrorism world wide and now letting Iran get nuclear weapons. Saudis are many of the foreign fighters in Iraq the Post has reported. They are funding insurgency in Afghanistan. Our troops are being sold out by the establishment for pipeline deals, etc.

== Later comment

They should tell the facts and forget the recommendations.  The difficult facts, like Saudi foreign fighters and money.  This is the opposite of the Hamilton Kean 9-11 Commission.

They hid key facts, like Saudi funding and Pakistan’s links to it, and instead made recommendations.  Those turned out to be pure smokescreens, reorganize the government, to distract us from what was going on, Saudi and Pakistan involvement, already spotted in 2003 by Congress, from being acted on.

This article represents hypotheses, speculation, or opinion. All other disclaimers apply.

read more | digg story

Panel May Have Few Good Options to Offer

November 12, 2006

Panel May Have Few Good Options to Offer
Bipartisan Group’s Plan Expected in Dec.

By Michael Abramowitz and Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 12, 2006; Page A01
“After meeting with President Bush tomorrow, a panel of prestigious Americans will begin deliberations to chart a new course on Iraq, with the goal of stabilizing the country with a different U.S. strategy and possibly the withdrawal of troops.”

Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group


Many good comments above. Basically, the study group is pretending we are at war with Iraq and nothing else. This is the Religion of Peace PC. It means we can’t talk about anything.

Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan are free to fund insurgencies against us in Iraq and Afghanistan and to support genocide in Africa, and we can’t talk about it under the MSM Democrat Republican Cone of PC Silence. Of course, the original cone of silence was where you could talk truth without being afraid. Problem is that only happens on the Internet. We have to go to the source to win.

If in WWII we had stopped in N. Africa to nation build, we would have lost. We didn’t have a Powell to spout KGB propaganda of 3rd world liberation and reparations. Instead we just invaded Sicily, Italy, France and Germany. We didn’t nation build along the way.

Does anyone even know when the last US troops left North Africa? No. Everyone forgot N. Africa and we went on to win.

In this war, we nation build the first little countries we get to instead of island hop to Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia the countries that are the real source of what’s against us. The time to fight wars is when we lose 200 killed.

The Saudis are the source of the foreign fighters and money in Iraq. Go the source countries against us, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

We will fight forever until we go against those 3. We have to put them all out at the same time, its like John Wayne’s oil fire fighting movie, Hellfighters (1968).


Bakers realism only extends to the next check from Saudi Arabia.

By OldAtlantic | Nov 12, 2006 3:40:56 PM=

Lee Hamilton has already said that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia had no link to 9-11 that he could find. Evidently he couldn’t find the 27 pages of the 2003 Congressional report linking Saudi Arabia to the financing of 9-11.

He also can’t find the web site of the Complete 9-11 Timeline. Nor can he find Christina Lamb’s London Times article, nor it appears anything else that might interdict the money flow from Saudi Arabia to big Washington law firms like Baker and Botts.

Now Baker and Botts has a James A. Baker IV, head of the Washington office. If he is young enough to collect Saudi money for 40 years, then Baker III isn’t going to recommend any action against Saudi Arabia. Why don’t we send the partners of Baker and Botts to fight in Iraq against Saudi foreign fighters funded and supplied from Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Send the Washington Office of Baker and Botts to Afghanistan. How long until they recommend we take on Pakistan after that happens? A draft of their kids might wake up Washington to who is funding the killing of our kids.

James A. Baker IV

search “James A Baker IV

Practice Areas


“Jamie Baker is partner in charge of the Washington office of Baker Botts, where his practice concentrates on international commercial and trade-related matters and transactions. His transactional practice relates principally to the energy and natural resources, telecommunications, and technology sectors of the economy, and involves contract negotiation and documentation of investment vehicles, business combinations, divestitures and operations, and various forms of corporate and project finance.”

“Mr. Baker’s recent representations have included transactions in the Arabian peninsula and North Africa, Central and East Asia, Europe, and Russia, many of which have involved negotiations between private concerns and government agencies or state enterprises.”
“From 1982 to 1985, prior to joining Baker Botts, Mr. Baker served as counsel to the U.S. Senate Majority Leader. He is currently co-chairman of the U.S.-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce, and he serves on the advisory board of Milestone Merchant Partners, a Washington-based investment firm.”

  • Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC) (1997-1999) – development of the BTC Pipeline transporting oil from the Caspian Sea at Baku to the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, Turkey”
  • James A. Baker III at Baker and Botts

    Practice Areas


    “Mr. Baker is presently a senior partner at Baker Botts. He is honorary chairman of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University and serves on the board of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. From 1997 to 2004, Mr. Baker served as the personal envoy of United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan in seeking a political solution to the conflict over Western Sahara. In 2003, Mr. Baker was appointed Special Presidential Envoy for President George W. Bush on the issue of Iraqi debt.”
    Bush Pioneers and Jack Abramoff

    Defunct Baku office link of Baker and Botts
    search “James A Baker III” Baker Botts

    At the Nation Its a Baker Botts World -stub public and rest subscription and Naomi Klein: James Baker Double Life -available to public.

    Baker Botts defending lawsuit against Saudis for 9-11. Damaging admissions according to MSNBC.

    “But in laying out their arguments, Sultan’s U.S. lawyers also presented highly detailed new evidence of the Saudi government’s role in funneling millions of dollars to a web of Islamic charities that are widely suspected by U.S. officials of covertly financing the operations of Al Qaeda and other international terrorist groups.”

    ==Saudi Arabia 9-11

    Saudi Government Provided Aid to 9/11 Hijackers, Sources Say
    By Josh Meyer
    The Los Angeles Times

    Saturday 02 August 2003

    WASHINGTON – The 27 classified pages of a congressional report about Sept. 11 depict a Saudi government that not only provided significant money and aid to the suicide hijackers but also allowed potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to flow to Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups through suspect charities and other fronts, according to sources familiar with the document.

    One U.S. official who has read the classified section said it describes “very direct, very specific links” between Saudi officials, two of the San Diego-based hijackers and other potential co-conspirators “that cannot be passed off as rogue, isolated or coincidental.”

    Said another official: “It’s really damning. What it says is that not only Saudi entities or nationals are implicated in 9/11, but the [Saudi] government” as well.”

    Jihadwatch comment.
    read more | digg story

    This article is hypotheses, speculation and opinion. All other conceivable disclaimers apply.

    %d bloggers like this: