Archive for the 'Barack Obama' Category

Ferraro was profiled by Obama Axelrod to be smeared as racist

March 13, 2008

The Geraldine Ferraro comment was completely mild and no one knew of it until the Barrack Obama campaign saw it as a way to silence all criticism of Barack Rezko Obama. This was an intentional ploy by David Axelrod. They had to reach to find this and turn it into a claim of racism. The original interview in the obscure paper the Daily Breeze was nothing to complain about at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geraldine_Ferraro

On March 7, 2008, Ferraro made remarks in an interview with a small newspaper from Torrance, California called The Daily Breeze, saying:

“I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama’s campaign – to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against,” she said. “For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on her. It’s been a very sexist media. Some just don’t like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign.

“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” she continued. “And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.” [21]

The Obama campaign had already decided in advance of the Ferraro comment to play the race card and label someone as racist in order to silence criticism of Obama. They couldn’t allow Obama to be seen as inexperienced, which he is, if they wanted to beat Hillary and then McCain. Obama was not being criticized last year at all by the press. In the last month its become acceptable to criticize Obama. Axelrod decided to find someone to take attack to silence critics.

Axelrod and Obama didn’t just react to Ferraro’s comments. They analyzed Ferraro’s history to pick her as the right one to attack. This was a deliberate act. They had already decided to destroy someone as racist for criticizing Obama, someone associated with the Clinton campaign. They were previewing
many comments for this. They got this comment, did a background check of Ferraro and decided Ferraro fit their profile of the white person they wanted to call racist.
==Axelrod

David Axelrod “dirty politics”

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070219/hayes

“Axelrod, veteran of Chicago’s ugly racialized battles,”

Obama switched to down and dirty Chicago style.

David Axelrod “dirty politics” smear

We saw the sneer side of Obama in one debate. Now we see the David Axelrod smear side of Obama. Barack Sneer and Smear Obama is not a likable candidate. What personna will he try to reinvent himself as?

Obama sneer “likeable enough”

==Ferraro Profiled

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geraldine_Ferraro

Controversy

Mondale’s campaign was already far behind the Republican ticket when Ferraro joined the ticket, and one issue that hurt her credibility was her disclosure of her husband’s tax returns. In July 1984, she said she would release both her and her husband’s tax returns. Yet a month later she backtracked and said she would release only her returns. Then she backtracked again, saying her husband would release “a financial — a tax statement” on August 20. But she must not have consulted her husband, because Zaccaro initially refused.[13] To her astonishment news surfaced that when she was a baby both parents had been under federal criminal indictment for gambling; the charges were dropped when her father died. After the election the House Ethics Committee officially criticized her mishandling of campaign finances.[14]

Axelrod read her bio on Wikipedia before they decided on Ferraro as the target for white working class victim of the race card. They were profiling her based on Jimmy the Greek Snyder, John Rocker, Trent Lott, etc. They wanted a white working class politician who had had problems in her past to go after.

Axelrod and Obama also wanted a woman so that people would associate that with Hillary. If it was a man, they would be reminded that Hillary had had Bill as a burden on her life. By picking a woman they avoid that sympathy card for Hillary.

The David Axelrod message is that any white person who criticizes Obama is in danger of losing their job. They set out to get Ferraro fired. This is an intentional deliberate ploy from the dirty world of racist Chicago politics, the political world that David Axelrod knows. Axelrod and Obama played the smear card and its intended to put Obama back on the pedastal where he can’t be criticized by any white who wants to keep their job.

Fox: Obama didn’t hold his hand over his fart.

November 8, 2007

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,304723,00.html

ALAN COLMES, CO-HOST: Illinois Senator Barack Obama finds himself at the center of yet another controversy as conservatives continue their assault on his patriotism, if you can believe that.

The Democratic presidential hopeful is captured on film at a steak fry sponsored by Iowa Senator Tom Harkin. A closer look shows that Obama, unlike his Democratic colleagues, isn’t putting his hand over his heart during the national anthem. Can you believe this? That’s an outrage.

Joining us now with reaction is the author of “Outrage”. Oh, wait a minute. What a coincidence. Former Clinton advisor — I didn’t even know that was coming — Dick Morris.

Can you believe he was — is this unbelievable? Is this going to ruin his chances politically forever or what?

DICK MORRIS, AUTHOR, “OUTRAGE”: If he’d covered his heart, he’d have covered himself.

COLMES: Oh, come on. That’s very funny, but come on.

In never before seen footage, Fox infrared video detectors show that Obama didn’t put his hand over his fart during the national anthem. Sean Hannity will have total 360 coverage at 9 Eastern.

Dick Morris said, “If you break wind during the National Anthem you are supposed to put your hand over it out of respect. Its the same as putting your hand over your heart. You should put one hand over your heart and the other over your fart.”

The photo of Obama shows both his hands folded. Morris, “He wasn’t holding his hand over his fart or his heart.” Maybe he has no heart? Obama to be named Arguido by Portuguese Police, Morris has the inside scoop.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/kate-mccann/

The Portuguese police will bring in witch sniffing dogs to check Barack Obama. Dick Morris:

These are special fart sniffing dogs. They can detect a fart months afterwards. They will be given the flag used at the ceremony. If they can detect Obama’s fart on it, then he will be indicted.

His wife has said he leaves his clothes on the floor. The dogs can tell that too.

Next up on Fox, Dick Morris and his fart sniffing dogs head to Gitmo.

West’s Rational and Irrational Choices on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan

August 23, 2007

We present a set of rational and irrational choices the West has for its policy in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, and the Persian Gulf.

Scenario 1: Bleed in Afghanistan.

US forces in Afghanistan, out of Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan to keep US monthly casualty rate high. Iran,Iraq, and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is supported by some Democratic candidates for president and some other leading Democrats. There is also some Republican support for this. This is also favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 2: Bleed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

US forces in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Iran and Pakistan both nuclear and both supporting insurgency in Afghanistan and Iraq to keep US casualty rate high. Iran and Pakistan bases of international terrorism.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Stupid policymakers.
Advocates: This is close to a second choice supported by some Democratic and Republican candidates for president and some other leading Democrats and Republicans. This is also somewhat favored by the MSM as inevitable, and therefore righteous, since its bad for us.

Scenario 3: Admit defeat and bring the war home.

US out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Persian Gulf. Iran and Pakistan nuclear. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq bases of international terrorism. US allows immigration and travel from Islamic lands to West.

Score: Bad for US.
Evaluation: Appeasing policymakers.
Advocates: Some in MSM, Some Democrats.

Variant of 1, 2 and 3: An ineffective missile and air attack on Iran leading to the Persian Gulf being closed to shipping and the isolation of US forces in Iraq, if any, and Kuwait from supply and naval support. This variant is somewhat unstable and leads either to war with Iran, or withdrawal from Iraq, Kuwait and the Gulf because of lack of supply.

Scenario 4a: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, Stay in Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US stays in Iraq and Afghanistan. Travel from Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq to West is not allowed. Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4b: Invade Iran, Surround and Blockade Pakistan, leave Iraq.

US invades Iran, surrounds Pakistan and blockades it with India to give up nukes. US leaves Iraq but stays in Afghanistan. Pakistan and Iran are not effective bases for terrorism against West. Iraq is a weak base of terrorism against West. Stop travel from Islamic countries to West.

Score: Improving for US.
Evaluation: Policy is trying to match means to ends.
Advocates: Almost no one.

Scenario 4a and 4b are logical and in our interest. Therefore they are scored as bigoted and racist and not possible by the MSM and Left.

Diagnosis: West is at war with Islam and won’t admit it. West is at war, demographically, with third world and won’t admit it. The mistakes in the Middle East are just more of the same as the last 50 years of 3rd world immigration. This demographic conflict is, in part, the West’s own making by its own expansion of the third world population bubble.

Senator John Warner has advocated changing Maliki and starting some withdrawal of US forces from Iraq. This is because Bush focuses on Iraq and won’t think about the rest. We have no rational policy. That leaves us in the Iraq irrationality that comes from Bush’s brain.

The following comment was posted at Raw Story and they pulled the entire thread.

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer
Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

If we do a missile strike on Iran, we have to pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf because of their antiship missiles. But then they can never go back in. We then can’t supply Iraq or even Kuwait. So we have to withdrawal completely from the Persian Gulf and abandon Kuwait and the Iraqi, Kuwaiti, and Saudi oil fields to Iran. This is actually worse than Saddam’s plan to take them.

The US is in paralysis because its in reality denial. We are in a war with Islam and the Middle East. They are at war with us. We are losing that war, primarily by immigration. We are going extinct from third world immigration as a mathematical theorem. We are unable to admit reality and so we can’t act on it.

We have allowed Pakistan to effectively extort money from us by the terrorism they have permitted since 1998 after they did their nuclear test. Pakistan had 38 billion in foreign debt on 9-11, with its interest greater than gross exports as its central banker wrote in a book. We let them extort money from us and they still are. We have to prevent Iran from getting nukes and denuke Pakistan.

Pakistan treats us with contempt because we have troops in Afghanistan but no ground supply route. The only way to get one is to invade Iran and position our forces on the border of Pakistan. Then we can, with India, surround and blockade Pakistan.

Instead, we are allowing pipeline deals through Pakistan to India that will further undermine our bargaining power. We allow arranged marriages from Pakistan and Afghanistan to people in the US as family reunification. We allow free movement to some terrorists from the Middle East to the West. We allow them on planes. We did so half-knowingly, in part, before 9-11.

We are fools. We deny reality. We deny our own biology. We think we can conquer death and the physical world by machines and know-how. Our entire lives have become a denial of reality. That is why our policies make no sense.

=

Senator Barack Obama advocates, in effect, our having a monthly casualty rate in Afghanistan pumped up by a nuclear Iran and nuclear Pakistan. This is now the consensus choice of the MSM and US establishment. They support continued appeasement and tribute to Pakistan. They support continued free access to the West by the Muslim world. They support our demographic suicide by immigration, and that’s a mathematical theorem, published in genetics journals.

See the Population Genetics, Wright Island Model, One Way Migration, and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

== Senator Hillary Clinton

Senator Clinton advocates something close to what Barack Obama advocates. She, like Obama, voted for the Bush Kennedy, McCain amnesty.

Senator John McCain is almost out of the race, because he advocated the same irrational mix Bush did, immigration and war. Obama and Clinton advocate that irrational mix as well. Almost every candidate does, except Tom Tancredo and a few others. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are antiwar, so they don’t advocate the full mix. Duncan Hunter is close to Tom Tancredo.

All major candidates, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Rudi Giuliani, Fred Thompson advocate war with at least one Muslim land, appeasement of the others, and allowing the Muslim lands to colonize us by immigration and for their young men here to kill us here.

Reality catches up with presidents, as Bush’s presidency shows. Advocating the irrational makes no sense. Now its in the open that both parties and all major candidates and the MSM are advocating inconsistent irrational policies guaranteed to fail.

The job is for the people to point this out in detail, in writing, on talk radio, in letters, faxes, phone calls, town meetings and other contacts with Congress, the executive, the MSM, etc.

We as voters have to know the facts, numbers, history, theory, etc. better than those we vote for, and then explain to them that their wrong statements are wrong and they aren’t good enough. We have to explain that to the MSM. It takes a village to teach our politicians, MSM, profs, etc. common sense, and rational decision making under uncertainty and under biology. These are things the MSM and elites would rather have us die from than be forced to admit they don’t know how to do it or are too lazy to.

We have to learn the numbers, history, facts, theory, etc. We have to put it together on the internet and elsewhere. We then have to force it down the throat of the MSM, Congress, President, and other elites including Wall Street.

==Iran and Pakistan are our Front line enemies.

We are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan in insurgencies funded and supported by Iran and Pakistan. Al Qaeda doesn’t come from the sky. They are supplied out of Pakistan and other insurgents are supported out of Iran or Saudi Arabia.

We can’t win insurgencies in the back countries of Iraq and Afghanistan while the frontline countries of Iran and Pakistan supply the insurgents and block us from effective action. We need to do a ground invasion now of Iran while its non-nuclear. Then we isolate Pakistan by surrounding it and blockading it.

Pakistan is not strong economically or financially. Pakistan without foreign aid or assistance or trade is not viable as the political entity it is. It will have to negotiate or face break up. We have to insist on our own removal and our own inspections of nuclear weapons.

As a surrounded and isolated country, Pakistan will not be able to maintain or develop its nuclear arsenal. Nuclear weapons decay, so will Pakistan’s. They will wilt, if we have the will to surround them and isolate them physically. That would also mean no arranged marriages from Pakistan to the West as part of family reunification.
==Appendix

August 23rd, 2007 at 11:08:09 From: Fallaci Admirer

Ground invasion
If we pull our ships out of the Persian Gulf before a missile/air strike, because of Iran’s antiship missiles, when can we go back in? If we can’t go back in, how can we supply Kuwait and Iraq? A single carrier going down is over 5000 lives. The battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. A ground invasion of Iran at that rate would equal 2 months staying in Iraq. The time to fight wars is when its cheap.

Thread now gone:

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/36593.html

This was about John Bolton’s call for attacking Iran.

Leave Biden alone on Obama, Indian

January 31, 2007

Political Correctness Police, PCP’s, target Senator Joe Biden again.  Paula Zahn Now on CNN is covering the story of Biden’s remarks on Obama and also an old comment about Indians and Dunkin Donuts and 7-11.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIT3jUrNTX0

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13757367/

“I’ve had a great relationship. In Delaware, the largest growth in population is Indian-Americans moving from India. You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking,” Biden said.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/31/biden.obama/

In the article published Wednesday, Biden is quoted evaluating presidential rivals Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, former Sen. John Edwards, D-North Carolina, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. His remarks about Obama, the only African-American serving in the Senate, drew the most scrutiny.

“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” Biden said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”

Biden issued a statement Wednesday afternoon, saying: “I deeply regret any offense my remark in the New York Observer might have caused anyone. That was not my intent and I expressed that to Sen. Obama.”

Hilary had her comment on Indians as well. She referenced Gandhi running a gas station in St. Louis. CNN also played that up big.

Compare this to the risks Democrats expose us to.

The Democrats expose us to risk from Iran by limiting war options of President Bush. If we do hot pursuit into Iran for some incident or they retaliate for our actions against them in Iraq by shooting an anti-ship missile at a Nimitz class carrier, we can lose 5700 people in one shot.

If we do a ground invasion, and pull our ships out, we might lose 200 to 2000 killed. By limiting us to retaliating to a small level, the Democrats actually will cost us 5 to 20 thousand killed at sea. We also let Iran use its subs at a time of its choosing.

Anything other than an immediate ground invasion of Iran exposes us to unacceptable risks. This is because we can defeat Iran at low cost by ground, but they can retaliate against our ships until we occupy them on the ground.

ST. LOUIS, Missouri (AP) — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton apologized for joking that Mahatma Gandhi used to run a gas station in St. Louis, saying it was “a lame attempt at humor.”

%d bloggers like this: