Putin can be person of the year, because he is a person, as far as we know. He is not an American, but Time doesn’t talk about the American of the Year but the Person of the Year. That is how Hitler and Stalin could make it.
For better or for worse, illegal immigrants are de facto Texans, certainly for purposes of our editorial’s points. To deny that seems to me to be a legalistic argument.
Auster points out that Illegal Aliens are not Texans because transitivity would imply that they are Americans, which they are not.
Dreher’s defense is weak. Were the Norman invaders of England in 1066, English? PC does name the invaders the same as the ethnic group of the victims, but this is intentional deception and propaganda. Invaders are not British, French, German, etc. merely by occupying the country. Americans did not become English when they waited to invade France in 1943, then become French in 1944 when they invaded France, and then become German in 1945 when they invaded Germany. Dreher speak would have it so, but it is not so.
Rather than Texan of the Year, Person of the Wright Island Model would be a better term.
Repetition from previous posts:
==Wright Island Model Sustained Immigration is genetic replacement immigration.
“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”
Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.
The Island Model with Stochastic Migration
Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
As pointed out in a previous post:
The theorem doesn’t say you get a mixture of old and new. The theorem says you get complete replacement of the old by the new. The old goes extinct. This is pure genetic replacement. It doesn’t matter if there is an intermediate mixture or not. Over time, the initial stock is replaced completely. Promises of a mixture are false.
So Person of the Wright Island Model makes more sense, here referring to the replacer as opposed to the victims on the island being replaced by the ethnic cleansing. In order to clarify who is who, the best formulation is
Ethnic Cleanser of the Year: The Illegal Alien.
Now surely the Dallas Morning News doesn’t want to say that Texans are ethnic cleansers, now do they? As to the Dallas Morning News they could win some sort of award, such as Confused Editor of the Year. As Auster points out, an illegal can’t be a Texan, so they can’t be Texan of the Year.
==A note on legal and illegal, both are ethnic cleansers.
The Wright Island Model quoted above applies both legal and illegal immigrants. Both are ethnic cleansers.
the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.
Legal or not it the gene frequency converges to that of the immigrants. What part of that can the Dallas Morning News not understand?
Legal ethnic cleansers v. illegal ethnic cleansers? Isn’t all ethnic cleansing illegal? Isn’t one way migration therefore illegal?