Archive for the 'Edward Snowden' Category

Why Russia needed to have Boris Berezovsky dead early in 2013

July 16, 2014

Russia needed to have Boris Berezovsky dead before the Boston bombing in April 2013 if it was responsible for it. If Berezovsky was alive, he would have accused Putin of being behind the Boston Bombing. So if Russia knew it was coming, it also knew it had to have Berezovsky dead if it wanted to avoid that. Berezovsky was a billionaire and former ruler of Russia in effect. His speaking out would have carried weight and been widely reported.

Did Russia know the Boston Bombing was coming in April 2013? Did it know the date and the place?

Putin’s comments after the Boston Bombing about Anatoly Chubais advised by CIA agents, ie Andrei Shleifer.

The coming of Sergei Guriev as a fake dissident fleeing Russia.

The use of the CIA outing in Moscow to distract attention from Snowden leaving Hawaii. Once both were public, Berezovsky would have seen that Putin had used the CIA in May to distract Snowden leaving Hawaii.

Berezovskly also would have understood how Putin was using leverage over Michael McFaul from the plagiarism kompromat on Duffie.

What about before Snowden?

Berezovsky would have seen Snowden as linked to the Boston Bombing and possible to the Aaron Swartz case. He might have spoken up about Russia’s surveillance systems and methods.

When Pierre Wauthier was killed, Berezovsky could have seen that it was about Ackermann gathering information from Russia
and Wauthier suspecting it.

The consideration of Larry Summers for the Fed chairman and then Stanley Fischer for vice chairman. Berezovsky might have tried to make a deal to expose them or leak information.

What about the bombings in Volgograd before the Olympics?

Berezovsky would have said Putin was behind them.

Josef Ackermann joining Renova Group would also have given Berezovsky a chance to speak out.

Stanford SIEPR Agenda Day award to Stanley Fischer. Berezovsky would have seen through the whole thing as well as Sergei Guriev going there.

The invasion of Crimea, Berezovsky would have opposed. Berezovsky would have seen that Putin was using Stanley Fischer as leverage over Obama, because Obama was complicit in covering up Fischer’s crimes. Berezovsky could have spoken out or leaded information.

The further invasion of Eastern Ukraine, Lugansk (or Luhansk) and Donetsk would have been the same thing. Berezovsky would have been tempted by each act of Putin to reuse the Stanley Fischer kompromat to speak out or leak out.

This is draft and preliminary. The above is hypotheses and speculation. Comments and corrections welcome. Please restate as questions. All other disclaimers apply.


Is DOJ trying to keep Edward Snowden in Moscow or China?

June 25, 2013

Is the goal of the DOJ to keep Edward Snowden in Russia or China? To protect DOJ from criminal prosecution?

Consider following hypothesis.

  1. Russia used kompromat to get IMF loans from Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer in the 1990s.
  2. GOP neocon profs knew this and used it as leverage to get Iraq Liberation Act 1998 and then during Bush v. Gore to influence Supreme Court to vote in Bush.
  3. DE Shaw and LTCM traded on this info in 1990s.
  4. Clinton, Bush and Obama DOJ covered it up.
  5. Harvard, MIT, etc. concealed this from FBI, USAO Mass during US v Harvard, Shleifer and Hay.
  6. When Larry Summers was rehired by USgov in 2009, Obama, Eric Holder, other DOJ leaders, Harvard, MIT, DE Shaw, etc concealed this from FBI.
  7. During Aaron Swartz case, USAO Mass used this to make MIT go along with harsh treatment of Aaron Swartz resulting in his suicide.
  8. When Tamerlan Tsarnaev tip came to FBI they concealed this info from local FBI and local police as part of coverup.  This resulted in Boston deaths.
  9. Coverup continued after Boston bombing.
  10. Edward Snowden may have info on this.

DOJ wants to conceal this info from public.  As long as Snowden is trapped in Russia, he can’t disclose this.  So Russia is where DOJ wants Edward Snowden.

So DOJ puts out talk of sanctions on Ecuador if it takes Snowden. If Snowden goes to Ecuador, Snowden can expose DOJ.  But if Snowden is in Moscow, he can’t. So DOJ is threatening Ecuador to keep Snowden in Moscow.

DOJ doesn’t know if Snowden has files on this, they just are playing it safe.

Drafted June 24 2013 8:01pm.  Published Eastern Daylight Time USA 9:32 PM June 25 2013. (at least I share a timezone with DOJ.)

Above are hypotheses or speculation.

‘Sofðu unga ástin mín’ This one is for Edward Snowden future Icelandic saga hero

June 22, 2013

Sofðu unga ástin mín

Gudrun Ingimars Sofdu unga ástin mín Icelandic Folksong

Another version

As I wrote last Midsummer:

Rannveig Sif Sigurdardottir has a beautiful voice and sings the traditional Icelandic lullaby Sofdu unga astin min.

Since then Edward Snowden has emerged as a potential new addition to the Icelandic heroes of old. Surely a saga is brewing from the North.

Bambi learns how to speak Icelandic, learn along!

Common Phrases in Icelandic Language : Simple Greetings in Icelandic

Iceland Midsummer.

Althing at Thingvellir, Iceland (English)

Althing is opposite of NSA, DOJ, Eastern District of Virginia forum shopping for harsh judges. Just the fact that the case is to be heard in the Eastern District of Virginia for a crime alleged to happen in Hawaii shows it is political and that it is intended to deny Edward Snowden a fair trial.

“Ex-NSA official on Snowden and the U.S. spy leviathan ” Thomas Drake

Back to Althing. Asylum for Edward Snowden.

Þingvellir – June 14 2010 (Iceland)

Á Sprengisandi (At Sprengisandur) – Icelandic folk song by Bergþór Pálsson

Olafur Vignir Sigurvinsson is the businessman trying to help bring Edward Snowden to Iceland.

Birgitta Jónsdóttir is a member of the Althing. Her webpage:

She is trying to help Edward Snowden get asylum in Iceland.

Next Midsummer, Edward Snowden will be in Iceland, hopefully at Thingvellir. Edward Snowden part of the Pantheon of Icelandic Heroes. They are part of why we have freedom and democracy today. Edward Snowden is their heir.

Edward Snowden America needs a hero and he showed us the light

June 16, 2013

Footloose- Holding Out for a Hero Lyrics!

From 9/11/2001 to now, America has heard one clear signal from its establishment, disdain. Cheney came out to call Edward Snowden a traitor. That is what the establishment thinks of every White who speaks up against their tyranny.

Cheney is responsible for torture and crimes against humanity. Cheney is evil from the late Roman Empire. Cheney represents what Christianity came to change. The entire establishment joined in the chorus of calling us scum as they take our jobs and give them to their new superwave of replacement immigrants.

Never once have we heard the truth from the establishment about immigration, Islam, or their immolation of Western Civilization and the White Race.

They are genociders of the White Race. They are torturers of everyone. They tortured Bradley Manning right in Quantico, Virginia. This was an insult to every man and woman who fought for America in history. This was intentionally done to show us that our sacrifice was in vain, and that their rule of torture and evil could not be stopped by any power of man or God.

The incredible evil that was exposed in their torture network and DOJ torture memos resulted in no prosecution. This was an affront to the Constitution, Human Rights and the Atlantic Charter.

They overturned guarantees of fair treatment that go back to Magna Carta. Their insolence towards the Constitution and the Founding Stock Americans who made it is now unrestrained. They openly break laws of man and God considered sacrosanct at the Numerberg Trials.

Cheney, Bush and most of all DOJ are Little Eichmanns of Torture. Even Eichmann had the decency to try to hide his crimes. At first, so did the neocon empire that replaces the old WASP elite. But now they simply revel openly in double standards in hate crimes and in every law and every element of a decent and civilized society. The prosecution of Zimmerman shows their contempt for law and justice. The DOJ and FBI corrupted the process, suborned perjury from witnesses and engaged openly in malicious prosecution. This was done openly on racial grounds.

Their eruption of hate at Edward Snowden shows their contempt and disdain for the rule of law and for truth. At bottom, this shows their contempt and disdain for us.

Judgment at Nuremberg verdict

This verdict applies to the Department of Justice, its torture memos, its violations of the 4th Amendment, its overcharging, its evil prison system, its sentencing guidelines of excess.

The killing of Todashev in secret and then the secret investigation concealing the names of those who did it from the public is a violation of the norms of civilization. Secret killings by the government are the essence of tyranny.

“Illegal even unto American law.”

DOJ is an accessory to the crimes of torture, of overcharging, of excessive sentencing, of genocide by immigration, of denial of civil rights to Whites, of denial of equal protection of the laws to Whites, of torture, of torture memos written at DOJ HQ that were part of the system of torture that circled the globe, this includes rendition, a practice of evil, as well as covering up all of these and many more. They have used prosecution of whistle blowers to frighten those who know in and out of government. They prosecuted Aaron Swartz undo death as part of this system of intimidation.


“Judgment at Nuremberg” (1961)
Spencer Tracy (Judge Dan Haywood)
Delivers Final Verdict

Judge Haywood: The trial conducted before this Tribunal began over eight months ago. The record of evidence is more than ten thousand pages long, and final arguments of counsel have been concluded.

Simple murders and atrocities do not constitute the gravamen of the charges in this indictment. Rather, the charge is that of conscious participation in a nationwide, government organized system of cruelty and injustice in violation of every moral and legal principle known to all civilized nations. The Tribunal has carefully studied the record and found therein abundant evidence to support beyond a reasonable doubt the charges against these defendants.

Heir Rolfe, in his very skillful defense, has asserted that there are others who must share the ultimate responsibility for what happened here in Germany. There is truth in this. The real complaining party at the bar in this courtroom is civilization. But the Tribunal does say that the men in the dock are responsible for their actions, men who sat in black robes in judgment on other men, men who took part in the enactment of laws and decrees, the purpose of which was the extermination of humans beings, men who in executive positions actively participated in the enforcement of these laws — illegal even under German law. The principle of criminal law in every civilized society has this in common: Any person who sways another to commit murder, any person who furnishes the lethal weapon for the purpose of the crime, any person who is an accessory to the crime — is guilty.

Heir Rolfe further asserts that the defendant, Janning, was an extraordinary jurist and acted in what he thought was the best interest of this country. There is truth in this also. Janning, to be sure, is a tragic figure. We believe he loathed the evil he did. But compassion for the present torture of his soul must not beget forgetfulness of the torture and the death of millions by the Government of which he was a part. Janning’s record and his fate illuminate the most shattering truth that has emerged from this trial: If he and all of the other defendants had been degraded perverts, if all of the leaders of the Third Reich had been sadistic monsters and maniacs, then these events would have no more moral significance than an earthquake, or any other natural catastrophe. But this trial has shown that under a national crisis, ordinary — even able and extraordinary — men can delude themselves into the commission of crimes so vast and heinous that they beggar the imagination. No one who has sat at through trial can ever forget them: men sterilized because of political belief; a mockery made of friendship and faith; the murder of children. How easily it can happen.

There are those in our own country too who today speak of the “protection of country” — of “survival.” A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient — to look the other way.

Well, the answer to that is “survival as what?” A country isn’t a rock. It’s not an extension of one’s self. It’s what it stands for. It’s what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult!

Before the people of the world, let it now be noted that here, in our decision, this is what we stand for: justice, truth, and the value of a single human being.


We must prosecute the leadership of the Department of Justice under Clinton, Bush and Obama for Crimes Against Humanity including the Genocide of the White Race by immigration and the violation of the Constitution of the United States and of every charter and document of human rights in the history of Mankind.

All the whistleblowers must be freed and pardoned including Edward Snowden, John Kiriakou and all the rest. Decency demands we dedicate our lives to achieving this goal.

The DOJ uses over prosecution, over charging, excessive sentencing guidelines to obstruct its own leaders from being held to the standard of decency and law at Nuremberg. That standard must be applied to them for America to regain its system of law and constitutional government. This is the only way forward for Mankind.

Edward Snowden reveals that NSA monitored Russia Medvedev communications

June 16, 2013

NSA targeted Dmitry Medvedev at London G20 summit

Leaked documents reveal Russian president was spied on during visit, as questions are raised over use of US base in Britain

Ewen MacAskill, Nick Davies, Nick Hopkins, Julian Borger and James Ball
The Guardian, Sunday 16 June 2013 15.47 EDT

This article appears to be just about from where and/or how Russia sent communications. It does not appear to be about the content of the communications. These are presumably encrypted.

Snowden is now going to reveal information of substance? This is still about how the communications game is played as opposed to actual substance unknown to the public.

Will Snowden expose that Russia used kompromat to get IMF loans in the 1990s from Lawrence Summers and Stanley Fischer? Did DOJ under Clinton, Bush and Obama cover this up? If so, Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill would leapfrog over Woodward and Bernstein, Guardian would leapfrog the Washington Post and Edward Snowden would leapfrog Deep Throat.

Does the NSA have a file on Russia Plagiarism Files? Does Snowden have it? This would change history.

This is a discussion of a story of public interest. Please restate all statements as questions. This is hypotheses or speculation. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: