Archive for the 'France' Category

IMF Dominique Strauss Kahn case questions

May 18, 2011

Some questions.

1. What times can they fix for entering and leaving the room from a) any record kept from opening the door b) records on electronic key cards c) hall cameras d) minibar being used e) checkout of hotel f) logs on chambermaid g) logs from person who allegedly told her the room was clear.

2. Did some man tell the chambermaid the room was empty?

3. Where did this conversation happen?

4. Who was he and why did he say this to her?

5. Was he arranging someone for DSK?

6. Did he pick a different woman?

7. Or not communicate fully with the chambermaid?

8. Was there any payment between any of these parties now or in the past?

9. How did this woman get to the US?

10. Where is she from?

11. Does she have resentments against France, US, Whites, Christians or the IMF?

12. Did DSK verbally abuse this man who is said to have told her the room was clear?

13. Did the maid go back to this man after the incident?

14. Was he her pimp?

15. Was there an exchange of money?

16. Was it the pimp who came up with the story?

17. Or this man, pimp or not?

18. Did this man then contact hotel security or 911?

19.Why did the maid enter the room before checkout?

20. Is there not a fixed rule not to?

21. Does the maid enter a room because some random hotel employee tells her to?

22. Why would this man have entered the room before the checkout?

23. Is there a record of when this man entered the room, if he did?

24. Why would this man tell the maid he had entered the room if he hadn’t? (See above for hypotheses and questions.)

25. Is the sequence the chambermaid described really credible?

26. Even if the encounter was arranged by this other man with DSK for a fee, would the scenario play out on the short time frame as described by the chambermaid?

27. Does she go to a mosque?

28. What about her family?

29. Who is the imam?

30. What is their past from before 9/11/2001 to the present?

31. The scenario described as it ever happened in America where a White man did this to a black chambermaid in a hotel?

32. Has it happened in Africa?

33. Was it done to her in Africa by some black?

34. Who is her the father of her child? Did something like this happen?

35. Was the scene in a movie that this mysterious hotel employee man saw?

http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/05/16/is-imf-managing-director-dominique-strauss-kahn-the-victim-of-a-false-rape-charge/

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/05/17/presumed-innocent-anyone#comment_540066

Why is Geithner so hot to take the lead to dump DSK from the IMF? Because Obama is black, a black chambermaid gets to dump the IMF head? Because the chambermaid is Muslim and Barack Hussein Obama is pResident? What story did the woman give to get in the country? Is this diversity lottery? Muslim reunification?

== Posted at Galliawatch

There were reports that a male hotel worker told the maid the room was clear. Who was he? Why did a male hotel worker go in the room before the guest checked out? Where did he tell her this? Did she go back to him after the alleged incident?

If there was no male worker telling her to go to the room, why did she go to the room before the guest checked out?

Did this unknown male arrange something for DSK? Then double cross him by sending in a maid who knew nothing? Or some other cross? Who is this man and what is his history? Did DSK verbally abuse him at a prior stay? Did the staff dislike DSK for verbal abuse from prior stays? Hercule Poirot is needed to unravel this one.

The basic fact that someone, the maid or another hotel worker went into the room before checkout is what to hold onto.

Also, since when does an employee go into a room and not find anyone there and decide the guest has checked out and tell the maid to clean it? Since when does a hotel employee go into a room just before check out to check if the guest is still there? What if the guest is going to try to stay late or another night? Did someone else want the room?

Even so, they wouldn’t just check out the head of the IMF without his knowing it or being informed that the room was now taken for someone else.

http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2011/05/dsk-everywhere.html

=

BHL denounced:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/asher-smith/bernardhenri-levy-says-th_b_862850.html

The phenomenon is not unique to Lévy or French philosophers. The Tennessee Freedom Coalition’s decision to honor Dutch politician Geert Wilders at an event last week caused little uproar — despite the latter’s habit of hate speech against Muslims.

Or maybe it’s a general lack of knowledge of the intricacies of foreign politics, and the inability to adequately judge whether the foreign pundit at hand is a legitimate figure or his or her country’s equivalent of Michele Bachmann.

Of course, the maid is a Muslim from Africa. That trumps BHL being Jewish under liberalism. Thus BHL becomes just another racist and Islamophobe. Our ranks keep growing.

BHL, Geert Wilders, and Michele Bachmann all White bigots. It is enough to make you want to rethink the whole BHL thing.

== It gets worse.

http://www.tnr.com/article/against-the-current/88598/strauss-kahn-levy-daniel-badinter-IMF

“An Indefensible Defense
French intellectuals’ despicable response to Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s arrest.”

David Rieff

A journalist from one of France’s main radio stations who witnessed Strauss-Kahn’s arraignment reported that, before he had been brought before the judge, there had been a procession of “blacks and Latinos accused of all sorts of petty crimes, above all selling drugs.”

So now all French people are White racist bigots. Convicted. Proof that America under its enlightened establishment is superior on race to the French intellectuals who pride themselves on being above the racists in America. Turns out they all think the same about blacks and Hispanics. It is a horror to see DSK in Ryker’s Island with the blacks and the Hispanics. In the same court room. Many liberals will rethink living in New York City or even Westchester County while at the same time denouncing others who say that for being racist. Perhaps even Goldman Sachs will think about increasing its office staff in other locations and reducing the New York staff or at least capping it.

Also is it such a good idea to have financial contracts subject to New York jurisdiction where a jury of blacks and Hispanics and some judge of this type handles a case? Maybe a White state should be found to have the contracts settled in like Utah or Vermont. Even Idaho and Montana might be considered.

The above are hypotheses or questions. All disclaimers apply.

Advertisements

bande de racailles video attack Paris bus youths

April 10, 2009

Vanishing American on story of white French man attacked by non-whites on a bus in Paris and not helped much by other passengers or bus driver.  Even when he got to bus driver, the attackers came back on the bus and attacked him again.  This video was posted in France with the word racailles and because of that the videos were removed and the posters called the real racists.  Even the victim gave an interview where he said the attackers were not racist and this had nothing to do with immigration and that the bloggers on the right were the real racists.

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-civlilzed-are-we.html

http://www.redstate.com/johnrichardson/2009/04/10/the-video-french-officials-dont-want-anyone-to-see/

Policeman arrested and suspended for giving video to right wing bloggers.  SUD RATP the union complains that the video was released but says this violence is typical every night.

http://www.slate.fr/story/3505/racailles-parcours-dun-buzz

French right wing politician Thomas Joly has link to Live Leak video after Youtube and Daily Motion and possibly Face book took it off for using word racaille to refer to youths.

http://thomasjolyfn.over-blog.com/article-29935690-6.html#anchorComment

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/vanam/4784014201035550316/?a=48654

Newspaper account.

http://www.lepost.fr/article/200…r-le- web_7.html

This paper apparently said the video was fake and then contacted RATP which said it was their video.

The article implies that Dailymotion and Youtube banned the videos because the articles were titled anti French agression or racism.

(As if a video of a white guy attacking non-whites with those titles would be banned.)

“2. Qu’en dit la RATP ?

Contactée par Le Post, la RATP confie que la vidéo peut être vraie. Tous les bus sont équipés de plusieurs caméras de surveillance. Les caméras captent des images en couleur et avec du son donc techniquement, l’authenticité de la vidéo est plausible.”

Link to youtube that says removed.

https://twitter.com/BUZZMAN_TIME/…atus/ 1463824800

RATP may have said they owned it. RATP is French urban transit authority that owns this bus and the video presumably.

“Parti de la France”

is the new right wing party apparently formed by some disgusted with Le Pen.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=…us+& btnG=Search

Post vu en Une Un homme agressé dans un bus

A better search is

Un homme agressé dans un bus RATP video

or

homme agressé dans un bus RATP video

http://www.rue89.com/2009/04/07/…flamme- internet

http://www.20minutes.fr/article/…dans-un- bus.php

More discussion on the claim video was fake.

http://lowblogging.fr/?p=1461

http://www.paperblog.fr/1791816/…not-fake-video/

More on whether video is fake. Apparently, the left in France immediately claimed the video was faked by the right to spread racism and bigotry.


Gravatar Account in English

http://observers.france24.com/en…ult-caught- cctv

“A document produced by the French interior ministry, which lists cases solved thanks to CCTV, mentions the incident. The events are described just as they unfold on the video. The document states that two of the attackers have been identified and charged with assault. ”

RATP in Google news search brings up
several articles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RATP

http://www.google.com/ hostednews…70F5ec6AOJFx02A

Victim says it was not a racist attack and he refuses to be exploited for politics.

“”Par ailleurs, ils n’étaient pas tous issus de l’immigration.”

Nothing to do with immigration says victim.

“”Diffuser ces images sur internet est très grave”, dit-il. “Il y a eu un grave amalgame entre la réalité de cette scène et sa représentation. Cette vidéo a circulé sur des sites extrémistes et a été exploitée par des politiques. Or, je ne veux pas être instrumentalisé. Le sujet est propice aux idées radicales et je n’ai aucune envie de nourrir cela. Il me fallait sortir de cette réductrice caricature”, a-t-il expliqué.”

He says the video is not the reality of this scene. Extremists are circulating it. In effect, he is blaming the racist whites circulating the video on the Internet and not the youths. Not immigration. He will not be the tool of racists or used by racists for their evil, i.e. to spread bigotry and racism.

Full interview with victim

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite…s-temoigne- .php


Gravatar Just to make it clear, the victim is saying we at this site are the racists.

More on word racailles used in title of videos, and which is a word used for non-whites living in the projects outside Paris. It is considered an improper word by left.

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/ a…_agression.html

La vidéo a circulé pendant plusieurs mois entre utilisateurs de Facebook avant d’être reprise, au début du mois d’avril par des blogs d’extrême-droite qui l’ont posté à plusieurs reprises sur les site de partage de vidéos You Tube et Dailymotion avec des titres tels que “Agression d’un blanc dans un bus RATP par des racailles” ou encore “Racailles anti-Français agresse dans un bus”.

Agression against a white by the racailles.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racaille

Wiki says the origin of the word is not clear. It appears to be a recent word. It was labeled racist by the left to call people in the projects by this name.

“bande de racailles”

Sarkozy used that phrase in Nov 2005 during the riots and burnings which caused an uproar in the left. He refused to apologize. So the videos intentionally used that word and that is why they were taken down, at least according to this article it appears.

This is then why the victim insists there was no racism by the attackers, because they were called racaille on the Internet, and the victim doesn’t want to be associated with the real racists, the people using the word racaille.

Its the word that is racism, not the act. That summarizes liberalism. Racism is a thought crime that must be punished. Punished by immigration to make whites a minority. Because racism is a unique thought crime of whites.

This is surely a true story of racism in our time.

==Same material as above but additional notes.

Newspaper account.

http://www.lepost.fr/article/2009/04/07/1486518_un-blanc-agresse-par-des-racailles-dans-un-bus-la-video-qui-seme-le-trouble-sur-le-web_7.html

This paper apparently said the video was fake and then contacted RATP which said it was their video.

The article implies that Dailymotion and Youtube banned the videos because the articles were titled anti French agression or racism.

(As if a video of a white guy attacking non-whites with those titles would be banned.)

“2. Qu’en dit la RATP ?

Contactée par Le Post, la RATP confie que la vidéo peut être vraie. Tous les bus sont équipés de plusieurs caméras de surveillance. Les caméras captent des images en couleur et avec du son donc techniquement, l’authenticité de la vidéo est plausible.”

Link to youtube that says removed.

RATP may have said they owned it.  RATP is French urban transit authority that owns this bus and the video presumably.

“Parti de la France”

is the new right wing party apparently formed by some disgusted with Le Pen.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Mjk&num=100&q=Post+vu+en+Une+Un+homme+agress%C3%A9+dans+un+bus+&btnG=Search

Post vu en Une Un homme agressé dans un bus

A better search is

Un homme agressé dans un bus RATP video

or

homme agressé dans un bus RATP video

http://www.rue89.com/2009/04/07/agression-dans-un-bus-ratp-la-video-qui-enflamme-internet

http://www.20minutes.fr/article/318507/France-La-RATP-ouvre-une-enquete-sur-une-video-d-agression-dans-un-bus.php

More discussion on the claim video was fake.

http://lowblogging.fr/?p=1461

http://www.paperblog.fr/1791816/un-homme-se-fait-agresser-dans-un-bus-de-la-ratp-fake-or-not-fake-video/

More on whether video is fake.  Apparently, the left in France immediately claimed the video was faked by the right to spread racism and bigotry.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/vanam/4784014201035550316/?a=23175

http://thomasjolyfn.over-blog.com/article-29935690-6.html#anchorComment

homme agressé dans un bus RATP video fake

==

Account in English

http://observers.france24.com/en/content/20090408-paris-night-bus-assault-caught-cctv

“A document produced by the French interior ministry, which lists cases solved thanks to CCTV, mentions the incident. The events are described just as they unfold on the video. The document states that two of the attackers have been identified and charged with assault. ”

RATP in Google news search brings up
several articles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RATP

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j5s9xG5SAWfUk70F5ec6AOJFx02A

Victim says it was not a racist attack and he refuses to be exploited for politics.

“”Par ailleurs, ils n’étaient pas tous issus de l’immigration.”

Nothing to do with immigration says victim.

“”Diffuser ces images sur internet est très grave”, dit-il. “Il y a eu un grave amalgame entre la réalité de cette scène et sa représentation. Cette vidéo a circulé sur des sites extrémistes et a été exploitée par des politiques. Or, je ne veux pas être instrumentalisé. Le sujet est propice aux idées radicales et je n’ai aucune envie de nourrir cela. Il me fallait sortir de cette réductrice caricature”, a-t-il expliqué.”

He says the video is not the reality of this scene.  Extremists are circulating it.  In effect, he is blaming the racist whites circulating the video on the Internet and not the youths.  Not immigration.  He will not be the tool of racists or used by racists for their evil, i.e. to spread bigotry and racism.

Full interview with victim

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/04/10/01016-20090410ARTFIG00681-la-victime-agressee-dans-le-bus-temoigne-.php

and what does he think of those who said the video was fake?
Who in effect said he was one of the fakers?  Does he condemn them?
No.  Nor the youths.  They were just trying to help their families.

One wonders how he could restrain himself from chanting Obama’s
going to change it.  Obama’s going to change it.
==

Just to make it clear, the victim is saying we at this site are the racists.
Old Atlantic | Homepage | 04.10.09 – 8:02 pm | #

==

These youths are just hard working. They are just here, in France,
trying to help their families.  This video shows their strong family
values.

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualites/vu_sur_le_web/20090410.OBS2937/lextremedroite_recupere_la_video_dune_agression.html

confirms why videos taken down.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racaille

“bande de racailles”

==

More on word racailles used in title of videos, and which is a word used for non-whites living in the projects outside Paris.  It is considered an improper word by left.

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualites/vu_sur_le_web/20090410.OBS2937/lextremedroite_recupere_la_video_dune_agression.html

La vidéo a circulé pendant plusieurs mois entre utilisateurs de Facebook avant d’être reprise, au début du mois d’avril par des blogs d’extrême-droite qui l’ont posté à plusieurs reprises sur les site de partage de vidéos You Tube et Dailymotion avec des titres tels que “Agression d’un blanc dans un bus RATP par des racailles” ou encore “Racailles anti-Français agresse dans un bus”.

Agression against a white by the racailles.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racaille

Wiki says the origin of the word is not clear.  It appears to be a recent word.  It was labeled racist by the left to call people in the projects by this name.

“bande de racailles”

Sarkozy used that phrase in Nov 2005 during the riots and burnings which caused an uproar in the left.  He refused to apologize.  So the videos intentionally used that word and that is why they were taken down, at least according to this article it appears.

This is then why the victim insists there was no racism by the attackers, because they were called racaille on the Internet, and the victim doesn’t want to be associated with the real racists, the people using the word racaille.

Its the word that is racism, not the act.  That summarizes liberalism.  Racism is a thought crime that must be punished. Punished by immigration to make whites a minority.  Because racism is a unique thought crime of whites.

This is surely a true story of racism in our time.

==

I recently entered a US govt building in DC area with security and security guard who was evidently Haitian asked me to epeler my name.  Which I did and he was satisfied.

== Video Who Will Raise Their Voice?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gApE5wwMK8

A little sanity.

“French Minister Says 43 Baggage Handlers at Main Paris Airport Denied Security Clearance”

October 22, 2006

By SOPHIE TETREL
Associated Press
Sunday, October 22, 2006; 9:48 AM

PARIS (AP) — “Authorities rescinded the security clearance of 43 baggage handlers at France’s main international airport due to suspicions they were connected with radical organizations, a top government minister said Saturday.”
– By SOPHIE TETREL

France is already in civil war with its Muslim immigrants. There are over 100 car burnings a night. Police are attacked, even in large groups. Its now a military type situation. This is what happens when after a 9-11, the MSM like Peter Jennings and Bush and McCain stand up and lie and call Americans bigots for wanting to stop the immigration. They can’t even say that 9-11 was done by Muslims.

Bush, McCain and the MSM blame the victims and say more terrorism is a certainty. Thats saying civil war is a certainty. Terrorism is civil war. That’s whats going on in France.

That is what started here in America when they attacked WTC in 1993. They were immigrants here in America who attacked us here. That’s civil war.

Bush and Rice lied to themselves so much after WTC 93 happened, that they thought the 2001 warnings must mean an attack outside the US. They have lied so much to themselves about immigration that they can’t see civil war in their face. An attack in this country by immigrants is civil war.

CAIR got a mosque at Quantico Marine Base. They want Muslims to have control over US, French, and UK nuclear weapons. Bush and McCain insist o giving it to them.
This article is opinion, hypotheses and speculation. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: