Archive for the 'Gates of Vienna' Category

Geert Wilders incitement Daubert junk science

January 22, 2009

Geert Wilders is charged with incitement to violence.  But no scientific proof of incitement to violence is offered.  This is junk science.  The case should be dismissed.  In the US, this can be done with a Daubert motion.

Whether statements incite is either subject to proof or it can’t be the basis of legal prosecution.  Do the statements incite is not how the judges feel subjectively.  The judge’s feelings are not proof.  Nor are insulted Muslims.

Do Wilder type statements actually incite violence? And compared to what?  TV shows?  Events in the Middle East?  A t-statistic has to be computed for the alleged incitement.

A Daubert motion is a motion, raised before or during trial, to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the jury. This is a special case of motion in limine, usually used to exclude the testimony of an expert witness who has no such expertise or used questionable methods to obtain the information.

The case should be dismissed because there is no actual evidence of incitement.  Proof of incitement to meet the Daubert standard means a scientific proof of incitement.  That means real evidence.  That means the type of evidence that is valid when you try to convict someone from bloodstains.  Its not how the judges feel about the bloodstains.

Even though Daubert is a US rule of law, the equivalent should be asserted in this case. There is no scientific standard for incitement of violence by a film or TV show.  There is no expert who is qualified because there is no body of public science on that subject.

There are no scientific journals on it.  Nor has any scientific journal published a paper on scientific tests of incitement to violence.  Thus the case has to be dismissed as being junk science.

Science means it can be replicated by others.  Scientific proof involves protocols of gathering samples, tests, and analysis of data. It means protocols of statistical significance.  Science is in the form of falsifiable hypothesis.  These are then subjected to tests.  The methodology of the tests is described in writing.  Others can then try to replicate the tests.  If they can’t with the same results, then its not science.

The incitement to violence charges against Wilders are just hysterical.   They are not based on any scientific theory.  Nor is there any comparison or benchmark standard.   They are not based on science and can not be subjected to scientific standards.  Therefore there is no way to use evidence in evaluating such charges nor can it be done in a fair, independent and replicable way.

That means no fair standard to defendants.  That means its a violation of human rights and basic universal concepts of law and justice.  Law that is against or outside of science is not within the modern concepts of law and justice.

Daubert is the law in the United States.  So any US case of hate speech, hate crime, etc. is subject to it.  Because Daubert draws on general principles of fairness and science, it should apply universally.  Daubert reflects (judicial) codification of scientific learning about evidence into the law.  Daubert is not some random decision.  It reflects decades of practice in the US courts.  To the extent that the same science is used in courts in the Netherlands with the same scientific protocols, the same reasoning applies there.

This should have been applied in other cases like the Mikko Ellilä case in Finland.  There a government ombudsman on his own initiated a case.  But that was without any scientific evidence.  In fact, it was mostly against science.   Science itself is evidence against non-scientific claims brought by agitated individuals, whether in government or not.  Taking offense is not scientific evidence of incitement to violence.


DownEast Blog defends Vlaams Belang

November 4, 2007

“Posted by Michael: 6:40:00 PM”
This article defends Vlaams Belang from charges it is anti-Semitic.   It has 25 comments in the comment thread.  The defense appears very good.  The author bears no grudge to Charles Johnson, but says:

 These days it seems I can’t open up LGF or there’s another smear from Charles Johnson, LGF founder and chief editor, against the party I am a member of, the Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest). Mr. Johnson, who, btw, I still admire very much for keeping up a blog which learns us a gazillion of facts on the true nature of the “Religion of Peace”, seems to have become convinced that the Vlaams Belang, and the Sweden Democrats party for that matter, are neo-nazi parties.

Vlaams Belang opposed a resolution in the EU tying the Holocaust to immigration opposition.   The resolution about the Holocaust also specified:

The purpose of this framework decision is to ensure that, in the European Union, racism and xenophobia are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties which can give rise to extradition or surrender; to improve and encourage judicial cooperation.

  PE 354.156, a Leftist/Green fabrication, is in its essence a shameful thing, as it recuperates one of the greatest horrors humanity has ever known for vile political purposes. To explain the VB’s decision, Filip Dewinter wrote in an Open Letter to the Jewish Community on January 28, 2005

Naturally Vlaams Belang bows down in deep respect for the suffering of all the victims of the Holocaust. The genocide against the Jewish people committed by the Nazi regime no one can never forget. The 60th anniversary of the release of the prisoners from the camp at Auschwitz is an excellent occasion to honor the victims and stands as a warning memory to the victims of every form of anti-Semitism and racism. I can refer to the MEP elected and party President Frank Vanhecke, who has also put this explicitly in his speech in the European Parliament with the following words: “Vlaams Belang bows down in deep respect for the Jews and for all the other victims of the criminal National Socialistic regime” [Nazi regime].


The above draws on an article from Gates of Vienna by Baron Bodissey:

Vanishing American’s March of Truth

November 1, 2007

Vanishing American has had a great series of articles attracting many comments at her site in important thread discussions where people come out for forbidden truth. These are an antidote to others giving into PC and denouncing others for unPC at some sites.

(Note this is also Fjordman’s March to Truth, and Lawrence Auster‘s March of Truth, and Sheik Yer’mami‘s March for Truth, and Paul Belien at Brussels Journal, and Gates of Vienna, Atlas Shrugs, many of them linked to below. These are all in response to what might be, although I have not followed him enough to be sure, Charles Johnson at LGF’s march from Truth. I am hopeful LGF can simply drop this line and we will have been strengthened and enlightened by this dialogue as good debate colleagues who can get past moments of excitement in discussion.)

One of the recent ones VA Posts is here:

My own comment at the thread on becoming more unPC is:

I have become more politically incorrect just as part of the process of commenting at sites or blogging. Each time we speak the truth against the establishment, it becomes easier to do. Also, truth builds on truth. As we speak more truth, we see more truth.

There are also fear resistance levels. There are taboos that are harder to break as you march through telling truth. James Watson went through one of the high resistance levels, and was attacked for it. The MSM are desperate to preserve their control on public speech. Each time we speak out to say an obvious truth it changes us and also makes it easier for others.

I agree with you that we are reverting to normality. The liberals think that as well. This is why they stage these attacks. The worst is to condemn others for speaking out. This kills us inside more than anything. This has been a great series of articles VA. Its having an impact.

==Circular Firing Squad at LGF continues:

With comments exposed at Little Green Footballs


Above has 40 comments on the comment thread as of 1 Nov 2007 10:25 AM.

Racism is human nature.

To claim it occurs only in Whites is absurd.

University of Delaware is making students say that. We are allowed to comment about it.

To claim that you are not a racist will only help doom you and your kin to oblivion.

The left disagrees with this, not the dooming, just the implication whites have a right to stop their “rightful” doom.

“Racism is human nature” seems to be generally believed. Liberals believe this, and their response is either self-hate or to manipulate it for self-wealth. SPLC and Wall Street are examples. Eduardo Mestre is the investment banker who did M and A, presumably American job destruction, and chaired the CSHL board that “let” Watson retire. Scientists believe this when they model and study human populations. Historians believe this when they write about history. The older the events, the easier it is to accept racism as part of the story and to just deal with it. The left has perfected the manipulation of self-hate about racism for its own ends, many of which are openly racist such as at Delaware University, covered in the VA threads.

Link from VA

The above deck of victimhood cards should send the message that LGF is on the wrong track by attacking anti-immigration groups. Its ineffective at best to be anti-Islamofascism and for immigration.

Steve Sailer at Vdare linked to this:

More antidotes

The best antidotes are to write comments, write emails to your Congressman, go to the Numbers USA Fax site or Fairus and fax against legal immigration. Does LGF think that everyone who called their senator in June 2007 is a racist who should be exiled from civil discussion? Does LGF think that fighting jihad means Muslim immigration to Europe and America?

Maybe Charles Johnson has opposed this immigration, I don’t follow him. But to attack Peter Brimelow and others who oppose immigration as bigots, if that is what he is doing, undermines whatever action he proposes or intends to fight jihad. Does he intend others to do the “racist” things that win the fight, while he stays above it all, and earns income however he does from holding back? I have not followed his comments closely enough to know what his views really are. But there is a trend in this direction.

Perhaps there is a new definition of neocon, although its wider than that group. A neocon is someone who incites others to do “racist” things that the neocon believes have to be done, while the neocon stands back and pretends to be above it and makes money safely. This is, of course, older than neocons.

Quite often, its a corporation engaged in intentional racist exploitation and democide for profit that is paying the neocons or liberals or flack hacks. Why do we let corporations engage in democide and pretend they are PC? It seems a valid statement that those engaged in democide for profit denounce others as racists. This is how the liberals, neocons, MSM, universities, think tanks, speaking fees for hire, etc. seem to earn their money.

Those who advocate for war against Islam or Islamofascism and call Virgil Goode a bigot or racist for wanting to end Muslim immigration are hypocrites. War is racist, and if its not, its damn close. Racism will be opposed by racism seems like a law of human physics. The left simply wants to charge a fee to each side of the transaction for transgressing.

The left says you can have your racism, but only if you pay an indulgence. Universities and think tanks are in the racket of handing out indulgences for racism. The left might be called the Race Indulgence Complex. The universities attack whites for racism, because whites have more money to pay for a “race indulgence”. Charge racism where the money is if you want to become rich.

This is draft and preliminary. This is not meant to criticize Charles Johnson or LGF, just to raise some issues for further discussion. This is subject to revision.

==Added 851 AM 1 Nov 2007

Following is from links at Little Green Footballs

Another smear and jeer site for dollars:

On February 22, Vlaams Belang leaders held a meeting with the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the oldest and most influential anti-immigrant group in the country. The next evening they also spoke at a forum organized by the “Robert A. Taft Club” in the Arlington, Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C.

Given the VB’s reputation, FAIR’s decision to meet with its representatives should tell us something about the American anti-immigrant lobby. Despite its origins in the den of white supremacist eugenics, FAIR executives have made a great deal of noise pretending that race, culture and the continued hegemony of white people are not on their agenda. FAIR gives money to candidates, supports and opposes legislation and other wise acts as if it is just one more D.C.-based political lobby. But VB is explicitly about race and white dominance, and the meeting with FAIR is one more piece of evidence linking the American lobby to white nationalism.

From this its clear this group is advocating white minority status everywhere. That is their clear agenda. This is implied by their statements. We need to wake up to their racism. By the way, its usually considered racist to eliminate a group, not to preserve it. But they have defined it as racism for whites to perpetuate themselves.


The Virginia forum, on the other hand, openly gathered an amalgam of Buchananites, proponents of scientific racism, and white supremacists from the Council of Conservative Citizens. The event was organized by 23-year-old Marcus Epstein, the executive director at both The American Cause Foundation, founded by Pat Buchanan, and the Team America PAC, where Pat’s sister Angela (Bay) Buchanan serves as chair.

Its time to stop denouncing our own so that this group can make money from its donors. We are supposed to denounce our own so they can get money for calling us racist and then making us call our own racist?

Among his many literary accomplishments, Epstein wrote his own eulogy of Sam Francis for the white nationalist website VDARE, declaring that, “like so many Southern leaders before him, Sam Francis ‘took his stand’.”

They just said that white majorities are racist and have to be eliminated everywhere. Wherever you take your stand, they will call you a racist, Nazi, confederate, Klanner, Duker, Buchananite, CCCer etc.

Epstein seemed to do everything except whistle Dixie in his prose.

Lincoln didn’t condemn Dixie, why should we condemn Dixie to please and profit this group?

And so he had the pleasure of introducing the two Vlaams Belangers to a crowd of about thirty-five white nationalists.

Notice how he is saying that preserving the white race is only a fringe supported activity. We are supposed to condemn everyone doing it or advocating it is the suggestion, because its fringe, and we will lose our job if we don’t denounce.

Its time to wake-up. This is hate that they are spewing. This is openly proclaimed democide and ethnocide and racecide. They are saying preserving whites is racism and you will lose your job if you advocate it. Time to listen to what they say.

This is an organized attack on the entire immigration restriction movement. They are attacking FAIR, Vdare, Buchanan, James Watson, etc. They are doing this for money and to destroy us.

It doesn’t matter what you say, they call you a racist Nazi white nationalist white supremacist. Even if you agree, as at U Delaware they call you that. All whites are white nationalist Nazis to the left.

Brentin Mock wrote an SPLC article about

All blacks are on green light no matter where” to be killed in LA county by Hispanic gangs.

One green light leads to the other. We can wordsmith this to

All whites are on green light to be called white nationalist Nazis no matter what they actually say or don’t say.

As University of Delaware said, it doesn’t matter what whites do or say or don’t do or don’t say, they will be treated the same in this war. As the Sultan said in the 19th century, “All wars on infidels are but one.” So to the left, “All wars on whites are but one.”

All whites are white nationalists to the left. Silence is not a defense for whites. All whites will be called white nationalists no matter what they say or don’t say.

This is not hyperbole. They say openly that no land will be a white majority land. They say openly anyone who calls for the survival of the white race they will destroy. What are these but an open proclamation of unending war and annihilation? Why don’t we listen to them and take them seriously?

LGF links to this as a normal site. This Building Democracy site is openly calling for racecide and ethnocide of whites. LGF links to it the same way it condemns the Muslim Brotherhood being condemned. How can LGF link to both approvingly? The only answer is money?

LGF wants an audience for anti-Islamofascism and thinks that linking to white democide and racecide sites will help it keep the money flowing? This is not to assert this as a conclusion, just to raise this issue. Didn’t LGF get started as just a random website trying to make money and then it latched onto anti-Islamofascism after 9-11? Someone at one of the VA threads linked to the early pages of LGF showing this was its evolution.

This is draft and preliminary. These are hypotheses and speculation. All statements should be restated as questions. All other disclaimers apply.

==9:42 AM 1 Nov 2007

The neocons engaged in torture and many have defended it. They have waterboarded Muslims. Some have at the same time denounced Virgil Goode as a bigot for saying stop Muslim immigration. The only reason to waterboard Muslims is Muslim immigration. If we had no Muslim immigration after the WTC 1993 attacks, we would not have tortured any Muslims. Its irrational to be for torture of Muslims and call those who say stop their immigration bigots.

As others have pointed out, they engage in this open hypocrisy to show their power over us. Our staying silent before it is meant to show us our powerlessness to change our fate. We die inside when we stay silent in the face of such hypocrisy and lies. That is the point. They want us to die inside, so they can make us die outside. That’s the whole point of the Democide Industrial Complex.

==The Wright Island Model Theorem

In population genetics, the case of one way migration is often treated in what is called the “Island Model”.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.

The above implies that if you have two genes in some frequency in the immigrant population, that under one way migration that frequency becomes the frequency on the island.

From PDF, conclusion:

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

==Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem

Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem

This adds to and is actually easier to understand than the Wright Island Model papers.

==Immigration is Whitecide, Its a Theorem.

The immigration process inherently leads to the extinction of all whites. Not just their genes for skin, all their genes are wiped out. This is a program of democide and racecide. Its published in science journals. We see why they are anti-science. They are engaging in whitecide and they don’t want scientists who know these papers to speak up like James Watson did.

==Sheik Yer-mami Winds of Jihad points out LGF’s error

For millennium wars were fought by alliances. Hitler allied himself with Muslims, the allies united against Hitler with communist Russia, the US allies itself with any despot or dictator that is useful to her, including Islamic Turkey, African despots and South American dictators. And the same US sees Saudi Arabia and Pakistan as allies against the misnamed ‘WoT’ – yet the lizard army is clinging to a moral buraq that is so high up in the stratosphere that the oxygen bottles explode.

Excellent comment thread. To paraphrase Zionist Younger, we can’t be to critical of those in the foxhole with us shooting out, especially when we aren’t even in the foxhole and they are.

==”When Friends Attack”

==Earlier OA articles keying off of VA’s discussion:

Search neocons anarchists

Results 1100 of about 599,000 for neocons anarchists.

Neocons seem to lack an inner consistency that undermines everything they touch. They don’t really understand that we have to preserve a civilization. This means preserving the people, and yes that includes preserving the whites and the white majority status of Western lands.

A non-white West is not the West. Why does that sound so racist? Does it sound as racist to say a non-Asian East is not the East? A non-Chinese China is not China? But a non-British Britain is not Britain. Why does that sound racist? Who made it sound racist? When?

A third world West won’t be the West. The neocons are so short sighted, and so worried about being called racist and losing their funding, that they undermine the fight they are in and turn on those who are doing the actual “racist” fighting that they act as voyeurs for. Victory in war is ugly and brings out ugly emotions. Those who call for war should have more internal reflection.

Those who call for torture of Muslim immigrants but call Virgil Goode a bigot for saying stop Muslim immigration are irrational and can’t see themselves. This is an ugly fight we are in. We didn’t choose it. We were going along with multiculti PC, despite our doubts, until we realized its a racial train wreck not racial harmony.

== Fjordman at Gates of Vienna has commented extensively on Charles Johnson and Vlaams Belang. Fjordman has extensively defended the idea of defending whites at LGF and forced out an important admission from Charles Johnson.

he (Charles Johnson) reluctantly replied that yes, Europeans have the right to resist being turned into a minority in their own countries.

On May 14 Call Senator John Warner VA to vote against Amnesty

May 11, 2007

It is urgent to get Senator John Warner of Virginia to vote against amnesty. The Senate may reach a compromise early the week of May 14, 2007. You need to call Monday May 14, 2007. If you live in Virginia call Senator Warner to vote against amnesty. Senator Warner is a fence sitter who voted for S. 2611 last year, for amnesty.

Advice from NumbersUSA:

“Always be polite but firm. You can make a very successful call by simply stating your name, where you are calling from, and a couple of brief talking points. Then, free up the line so the next caller can get through.”

We want Warner to vote against whatever bill comes up and to vote against cloture, i.e. vote against cutting off debate. Mention Lou Dobbs and that Lou Dobbs is against the bill. Say you trust and have faith in Lou Dobbs.

Warner has a D from Americans for Better Immigration.

Warner voted for amnesty last year S. 2611:

Warner’s current statement on comprehensive immigration:

John Warner is the 21st wealthiest Senator.

Net Worth: From $4,858,197 to $7,186,148 Ranks 21st among all members of the Senate”

List of All Senators wealth

Vote for final passage on S. 2611, Amnesty i.e. Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

A Nation of Lou Dobbs Democrats


“NEW DATA SHOW EXTRAORDINARY JUMP IN INCOME CONCENTRATION IN 2004″ By Aviva Aron-Dine and Isaac Shapiro for a graph of income share of top 1 percent from 1913 to 2004.

Income Inequality U Shape Timeline

7 of the top 8 wealthiest Senators voted for S. 2611, amnesty, affirmative action, non-deportable crime, and a pathway for the top 1 percent of households to continue to enjoy 20 percent of each year’s income, compared to 10 percent before Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. The only 1 of the top 8 who didn’t vote for S. 2611 didn’t vote, Jay Rockefeller. McCain is 7th and Kennedy 8th in wealth.

Open Secrets

Rank Name Minimum Net Worth Maximum Net Worth

1 Herb Kohl (D-Wis) $219,098,029 to $234,549,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

2 John Kerry (D-Mass) $165,741,511 to $235,262,100 Voted Yes S. 2611

3 Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa) $78,150,023 to $101,579,003 Not Voting S. 2611

4 Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) $43,343,464 to $98,660,021 Voted Yes S. 2611

5 Lincoln D. Chafee (R-RI) $41,153,105 to $64,096,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

6 Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) $38,198,170 to $90,733,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

7 John McCain (R-Ariz) $25,071,142 to $38,043,014 Voted Yes S. 2611

8 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $19,189,049 to $93,043,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

More data here

Free fax to Congress on hot immigration bills:


Immigration doesn’t help the middle class. Men’s median wages are lower than in 1973.

Income, Poverty, and
Health Insurance Coverage in
the United States: 2005

US Census Report on wages By
Carmen DeNavas-Walt
Bernadette D. Proctor
Cheryl Hill Lee

Graph page 18 shows men’s median wages peaked in 1973, they are lower now. Women’s median wages are lower than men’s, which means they are lower than men earned in 1973. Black median wages are lower than all men, which means black wages are lower than what all men made in 1973.

1973 is 35 years ago. When they push immigration after the US government reports wages are stagnant for 35 years it shows they are voting their stock portfolio.

Immigration keeps wages to the 1973 level. That boosts up stock prices, because productivity has gone up since 1973. So the money is going to profits which pushes up stock prices. The leading Senators pushing immigration, McCain and Kennedy are worth 10’s of millions of dollars. They are i the top 1 percent that get 20 percent of the income.

The top 1 percent got 20 percent of income before the 1920’s restriction, 10 percent after, and now get 20 percent with 1965 legal immigration. Kennedy pushed that act and he is now wealthier because his stocks went up.


Senate trades our lives and security so that they get 20 dollars of every 100 dollars we create at work instead of the 10 dollars they got before the 1965 Immigration Act.

Worker Productivity Graph and info

Productivity never stopped growing, except possibly during some recessions or odd years from 1947 to present.

1947 to 1973 worker productivity up 2.7 percent per year.

1973 to early 1990’s 1.4 percent per year

1995 to 2004 2.9 percent per year increase in worker productivity.

Yet men’s median wages are lower than in 1973, and the other groups, women, blacks, etc. are lower than all men in 1973.

The workers became more productive, but wages stayed at or below the level of men in 1973.

What changed is that the top 1 percent get 20 percent of every 100 dollars we make now but only got 10 dollars per every 100 before the 1965 Immigration Act.

Scroll down for graph below:

U Shaped Income Inequality Timeline

Stocks boomed. Senator’s wealth boomed.

They are trading off our lives for their stock portfolio.


Lower wages, shorter lifetimes data

“Mortality, Education, Income, and Inequality among American Cohorts”

Angus Deaton
Christina Paxson

“People whose family income was less than $5,000 in 1980 could expect to live about 25 percent fewer years than people whose family income was greater than $50,000.”

The Senate is in jihad against middle class wages. The Senate jihad against wages by immigration has also lowered our lifespan. The Senate jihad on wages by immigration kills more Americans than the Senate’s jihad against Americans by importing Muslim jihadis to kill us directly. The indirect killing by lower lifespans kills far more than the Fort Dix type, at least for now.


Did immigration cause productivity to go up? No. Productivity was going up from 1947 onwards. If you draw a straight line from 1947 to 2004 its close to the graph anyhow.

The slowdown in productivity growth started in 1973, 8 years after the 1965 Immigration Act.

“The consensus among most economists is that there is no one factor that accounts for that productivity slowdown, but rather that it was the result of a series of different influences that each made a modest contribution and happened to occur at about the same time.”

“Among the factors that are likely to have played some role are increased safety and environmental regulation, reduced investment in productive equipment, and demographic changes , along with a number of other developments.”

Demographic changes is code words for immigration. They are not even allowed to say it.


Productivity Graph and analysis

So we had 2.7 percent productivity growth before immigration. Immigration brought down productivity growth, it didn’t increase it. Moreover, before the 1965 Immigration Act, wages went up with productivity. We got all our increased productivity. That’s our work. After the 1965 Immigration Act, the rich Senator’s got our productivity increases in their stock portfolio.

Men’s median wages stopped growing completely in 1973. Zero growth in wages while productivity goes up substantially shows that markets are undercutting workers.

The income inequality graph proves this as well. The top 1 percent got 20 percent before immigration restriction in the 1920’s, they got 10 percent during restriction up to the 1965 Immigration Act, and now they are back to 20 percent. This shows its immigration that is driving this redistribution from those who create income to those who control income distribution by controlling immigration. Wealth inequality has become even worse than income inequality.

==Two Virginia Beach Teens killed by drunk illegal

Virginia Beach Teens Killed at Intersection [Brenda Walker]

Click on above to see their photo together. For some systems you can use the mouse to put the cursor over the link above and you can see the photo.

Below, Tessa Tranchant, 16, left, and Allison Kunhardt, 17, were killed late Friday.”

Alfredo Ramos, who was born in Mexico of Guatemalan parents, has been in the United States for about seven years.
[Suspect in crash that killed 2 had alcohol-related convictions, Hampton Roads Pilot 4/3/07]

Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome” By Brenda Walker

Top Ten Reasons Why the US Should Not Marry Mexico”
By Brenda Walker

== U Md Econ major killed by drunk illegal who fled scene.

A Son, Brother and “Friend with Everyone” Is Killed
[Brenda Walker] @ 7:32 am [Email author] [Email This Article] [Print This Article]

Another bright young person has had his life snuffed out by a drunk-driving illegal alien. Matthew Watson, 20, a sophomore economics major at the University of Maryland, was killed May 5 at 3 am when the Jeep Cherokee in which he was a passenger was struck by a truck driven by Never Leopoldo Navarro-Montoya. The Cherokee driver and two other passengers were hospitalized with injuries considered not life threatening.

The Mexican fled the scene and was found unconscious a third of a mile away on the median strip. Police said Navarro-Montoya possessed a permanent resident card and a Social Security card with his name, which he said were forged and bought in Texas.

The death by illegal alien was the second of a Howard County resident during the last six months. Marine Cpl. Brian Mathews survived a tour of duty in Iraq, but was killed on Thanksgiving night along with his date.

The family has organized two scholarships to honor Matt’s memory — one for a football player to attend summer training camp and the other for a student who participates in music and sports to attend the University of Maryland. The website also has photos and memories of Matt, including the article ‘He was friends with everyone’.

==Also covered here:

=Islam at GMU

search Northern Virginiastan

Friday, May 11, 2007

GMU – worse than I initially reported

A follow-up to my post Muslim spacehogs at GMU:

UPDATE May 11, 2007: From Snapped Shot via LGF, Brian C. Ledbetter clears up some misperceptions about George Mason U and the Muslim Student Association: for example, not all bathrooms in the Johnson Center have ritual foot-washing basins, but every bathroom in the northeastern half of the building has foot-washing basins. Still doesn’t give me a warm fuzzy.

The original article from Snapped Shot was titled “Some are more equal.” This statement is adapted from the proclamation “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” made by the ruling pigs in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. A fitting extension of our porcine metaphor.

As noted in a previous article Muslim accomodations on college campuses:

The [Muslim Accomodations Task Force, a project of the Muslim Student Association] isn’t operated by overly enthusiastic college students. Its professional staff, based in the Washington, D.C., area, includes coordinators who provide legal advice, teach students to lobby, write letters on their behalf, and help them overcome “obstacles” such as college administrators’ concerns about violating the separation of church and state.

To learn how local colleges and universities are “accomodating” Muslim demands, visit Muslim Accomodations (East Zone USA) on the MSA National web site.


Gates of Vienna Monday, October 10, 2005
Jamaat ul-Fuqra in Virginia, Part 1
by Baron Bodissey

During the Beltway Sniper crisis, back in the fall of 2002, a series of articles in The Washington Times described John Allen Muhammad’s conversion to Islam, and his later break with the Nation of Islam (the articles are no longer available, but extracts have been preserved here). Apparently the NOI was not militant enough for Mr. Muhammad, and he left it to become involved with a group called Jamaat ul-Fuqra (Arabic for “community of the impoverished”), a terrorist organization founded by a notorious Pakistani cleric, Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani.

What drew my eye in the article was the mention of a Jamaat ul-Fuqra compound in Red House, Virginia. Red House?! I know Red House — a small village in rural Charlotte County.

But first: some background on Jamaat ul-Fuqra. The group was founded in New York by Sheikh Gilani in New York in 1980. Its current headquarters is in Hancock, New York, and it has various compounds, or Jamaats, scattered throughout the United States and Canada, notably in Colorado, New York, Tennessee, Georgia, and Virginia. Most of the adherents are reported to be American-born Black Muslims who follow a strict Islamist ideology.

Sheikh Gilani, you may remember, is the cleric with whom Daniel Pearl had arranged an interview back in January of 2002. Unfortunately, Mr. Pearl was betrayed by his sources, and then abducted and beheaded. Sheikh Gilani was arrested later that month and languishes in Pakistani custody.

Virginia Part 2

Virginia Part 3

==Islamberg branches Red House, Virginia; Falls Church, Virginia, Hyattsville, Maryland

Islamberg, New York: “You can hear gunfire up there. I can’t understand why the FBI won’t shut it down” from Jihad Watch
Paul Williams report in Canada Free Press: Islamberg is a branch of Muslims of the Americas Inc., a tax-exempt organization formed in 1980 by Pakistani cleric Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, who refers to himself as “the sixth Sultan Ul Faqr,” Gilani, has been directly linked by court documents to Jamaat ul-Fuqra or “community of the impoverished,” an organization that seeks to “purify” Islam through violence.

Though primarily based in Lahore, Pakistan, Jamaat ul-Fuqra has operational headquarters in New York and openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in hamaats or compounds, such as Islamberg, where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority. Additional hamaats have been established in Hyattsville, Maryland; Red House, Virginia; Falls Church, Virginia; Macon, Georgia; York, South Carolina; Dover, Tennessee; Buena Vista, Colorado; Talihina, Oklahoma; Tulane Country, California; Commerce, California; and Onalaska, Washington. Others are being built, including an expansive facility in Sherman, Pennsylvania.

Some 9-11 terrorists used Maryland and Virginia for their final staging.


Look up your state impact statement at


Numbers USA lets you fax your Congressman and Senator for free on stopping the amnesty bill for illegals and reducing legal immigration.


You can register without paying money. You click on buttons to send faxes once you enter your personal info. You can send faxes to each Senator and your rep by clicking buttons. They have them already written out.

You can stop chain migration which lets jihadis come through arranged marriage. You can stop illegal amnesty which will help other jihadis.

“NumbersUSA’s 314,000 activist members are contacting their Senators and asking them to honor the pro-worker spirit of the Commission, chaired by the late Barbara Jordan (D-Texas). Click here to see what actions are available for you to take today!”

Join up and make a difference. Its easier to click buttons to fax now, then fight a civil war later.

Islamophobia Alert: 60 Minutes Jihad means violence

May 7, 2007

60 minutes used Jihad to mean violent struggle and didn’t mention internal struggle once in their broadcast.

“Switching Sides: Inside The Enemy Camp
Bob Simon Talks To A Former Terrorist Commander” Simon interviewed Nasir Abas.

He was a top commander in Jemaah Islamiyah, al Qaeda’s franchise operation in Southeast Asia.

For 20 years, he worked to achieve an Islamic state throughout Southeast Asia. He embraced the idea of a holy war and spoke the language of jihad.

“I hate the infidels,” Abas admits he once believed. (For some reason this is never called infidelphobia.)

“Infidel is a non-Muslim people,” Abas replies.

“And you hated non-Muslim people,” Simon remarks. “At that time you would have hated me.”

“Of course. But now not,” Abas says.

(This is what Infidelphobia sounds like. Interestingly, 60 Minutes piece is what the Swedish and Finnish government think is Islamophobia. All phobia is evil by Westerners.)

Infidelphobia and Islamophobia, compare and contrast:  Both are commanded in the Quran.  Muslims are commanded to fear and subjugate infidels.  Infidels are commanded to fear and submit to Islam and Muslims.  Thus the only difference, is that infidels are to submit and Muslims are to subjugate as a consequence of their fears.  This is the view of the Quran.  Muslims are commanded to make it so.  The Swedish, Finnish, etc. governments follow the Quran in this regard.

There are many verses to Muslims to fear infidels.  There are many verses commanding infidels to submit.  Submission by its nature, ipso res, comes from fear.  For the Quran to command that infidels submit, means a command that they fear.  Submission comes from great fear, not little fear.  So the Quran commands great fear in infidels.

In fact, the fear of submission is the fear that slaves feel, or women when they stop resisting a rape.  This is the fear of paralysis.  That is a fear controlled in the lower brain.  This is the fear Islam commands.  Is that irrational fear?  Its fight or flight or submit fear.

That fear doesn’t go through the higher reasoning centers at all.  Its in the lower brain stem that has far more control of our motor responses than the higher brain.   The Quran commands the most extreme fear the brain is capable of, and in the lower brain centers that bypass the higher brain centers.

Finnish police go after blogger Mikko Ellilä from Dhimmi Watch: “Tundra Tabloids and Gates of Vienna have important updates on the case of Finnish blogger Mikko Ellilä”. Dhimmi Watch: “Finnish Police Will Question Blogger Under ‘Incitement Against Groups’ Law” See Lynn Davidson at Newsbusters.

%d bloggers like this: