Archive for the 'Hispanic Nationalism' Category

Perez Hilton posts vulgar drawing of Carrie Prejean

April 21, 2009

Background on story of Perez Hilton’s question on gay rights to Carrie Prejean, Miss California.,22049,25363645-5001026,00.html

Perez Hilton was a judge in the Miss America contest.  But he put an improper drawing on a photo of Carrie Prejean, Miss California, on his webpage after the contest:

He also called her a dumb bitch for not supporting gay marriage.

He has a crude drawing on the photo of another woman as well.

This may be a long standing pattern with him to use these drawings of women.  This is hatred of women.  Perez Hilton is a gay activist.  He is someone the Hollywood community has lifted up as presenting their values and their attitude towards middle America.

The vulgarity of it is stunning.  When a person agrees to be a judge they agree to act as if neutral and impartial, not as if they routinely put up such drawings on their website.

What it shows is the overweening arrogance of gay activists.  They hate straights as was pointed out at another website or a comment, I don’t remember where I saw that opinion.  But it is true.  They hate the people and they hate the community and its morality.  They become part of the 5th column trying to destroy it.  They become actively disloyal.   Gays spread disease and it takes hate to do that.  That was going on long before aids.  To do that shows a hatred of morality, which is what gay activists demonstrate over and over by their violation of morality.

DOJ Civil Rights Division gay lawyers in Philadelphia are another example.  When Christians were at their parade, they had them prosecuted to an extreme.  Eventually the charges were thrown out, but after great cost to the Christians in time and money.

Stories on Philadelpha 4 or Philadelphia 11

Philadelphia Eleven all freed by court:

DOJ Civil Rights Division is the real hate group.  Eric Holder is the real hate leader in America along with Obama.

Perez Hilton is following Obama’s example of vulgar gestures towards women.

See also Texas Darlin on Obama’s tour:

Obama’s inauguration was the same thing.  Links to inauguration and Obama giving finger to Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and calling Sara Palin a pig, and smiling at his inauguration when whites were attacked by one of his chosen black speakers.

Perez Hilton was born to parents from Cuba and may be posting his drawing to attack Carrie Prejean for being part of white middle America.

“Mario Armando Lavandeira, Jr. (born March 23, 1978 in Miami, Florida) is an American blogger and television personality.”

This is the same thing we hear from Michael Steele that white America looks like Nazi Germany.  To Steele, Miss California looks Nazi.

This is the attitude of the left and Hollywood.  It is an attitude of hate. This is where genocide by immigration comes from.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

We are being genocided by them.  They hate us.  They say it openly.  This is ethnic cleansing.  Their talk is ethnic cleansing talk.  Get involved.  You are being ethnically cleansed.  Stop being quiet about it.  There is no right time to wait when you are being ethnically cleansed.  Now is the time to speak up against it.

Support, NumbersUSA, Fairus, etc. is having a fundraising drive.


“On September 15, 2008, named Perez Hilton as the Hispanic of the Year in Honor of Hispanic Heritage Month.[27]

Perez Hilton personifies Hispanic values in the opinion of Hispanics.  He has contempt for the morality of Middle America and for white Americans.  He spews that out.  At some point, that shows hatred of whites.   He has been doing his blog for years it appears from Wiki.  Much of it appears to be contempt for white morality, including claims that he violated copyright laws.

This contempt for law and morality of whites is linked to and becomes or comes from hatred of whites.  Its hatred of the white country and the country whites created.  Its hatred of the whites and the wish and action to ethnically cleanse whites and take this country from them.

This is hatred of whites.  Its real.  It is the hate that Hispanics show.  Its the deeds that Hispanics live.   Its not family values.  Its hatred of and ethnic cleansing of and genocide of whites in their own country.


A black judge said the contestant was wrong to say what she thought.   That judge said many were offended at her answer and didn’t like her.  Note the black judge can’t tell the difference between saying what you think as if its optional and telling the truth to a direct specific question asked by a judge.

The black morality is you say what gets you ahead.  When you are in
power, you get to indulge your prejudices and enjoy power over others and subjecting them to fear.  This is also the Hispanic attitude.

The white attitude is when a judge asks you a specific question, you tell the truth.  This is why blacks and Hispanics are not fit for power.  This is why we need to separate.  Its why our schools and prisons are so bad for whites now.  Its why government doesnt’t work.  Non-whites with these attitudes fill positions of power and use that
power in a non-judicious unfair way.  Moreover, these two judges don’t even realize they are showing they are bad judges who are the worst type of judges, ones who see their position as one of power just to indulge themselves, not to be fair.

Whites think a judge is supposed to lean over backwards to be fair.   Whites think a judge is there to do judstice.  This Hispanic judge and black judge think when someone answers their question with the truth its an affront to them and a chance for them to take offense and hurt the person to show their power.  This makes the person respect them.  They think respect is servility and lying to those in power.   The black and Hispanic judge don’t think a judge is there to serve the parties but that the parties are there to cater to the judge as someone who has power over them.

This is why they corrupt corrups and schools and police stations and everything else.  Its why their places are places of violence.  Its why everyone flees black and Hispanic countries or cities.  They carry these attitudes towards their own people, although they indulge them more against whites who are foolish enough to give them power they don’t understand the proper way to exercise.

These two bad judges and the others like them have damaged the Miss America pageant.  They asked a direct question and got a direct answer.  Then in public they say that people shouldn’t tell the truth to judges and think its offensive and arrogant to tell a judge the truthful answer to a question if its not what they want to hear.  This is corrupt to the core.

They are corrupt in their DNA and can’t even understand what judge means.  They think judge and tyrant are the same thing.  They think its about power.  You are service to power and you dominate the servile who are cowering before you.  This is why apologies, affirmative action, and immigration make things worse not better.  It empowers non-whites to attack.

This is why its a human rights abuse for whites to have to live with non-whites.  This is why non-whites have to go back to their dysfunctional lands that they made that way and leave whites to their own lands and ways.

But whites can’t expect this to happen from non-whites who will destroy whites even though it destroys civilization on earth and destroys the future of earth.  Whites have  a moral duty to stop this and save civilization and the future.  That means a moral duty to keep majorities in white lands and incentivize non-whites to return to their lands even though they have destroyed them.


New York Times Nativists are Restless Vdare

February 1, 2009

NYT attacks Peter Brimelow, Marcus Epstein, Vdare, Bay Buchanan, Tom Tancredo, Pat Buchanan, Republicans, white people, Founding Stock Americans, Southernors, Virginia Dare, Benjamin Franklin implicitly and everyone linked to them in any way.

Americans want immigration solved, and they realize that mass deportations will not do that. When you add the unprecedented engagement of growing numbers of Latino voters in 2008, it becomes clear that the nativist path is the path to permanent political irrelevance. Unless you can find a way to get rid of all the Latinos.

What a very interesting point of view.  NYT is saying you can never stop Latino immigration, since there will always be illegals to be legalized or anchor babies even if stopped legal immigration.  Either Latinos take over completely and genocide all here, or the rest have to eject all the Latinos.  Wisdom of the New York Times.

NYT is saying its all Latinos out or its:

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

NYT is saying literally its all Latino genes replace all others or the others eject all Latinos.  This is because some sort of Latino immigration continues forever if any Latinos remain is the NYT position.  By the theorem that implies genetic extinction of all other genes.  Not mixing, but complete replacement.  Theorem doesn’t say there is final state of mixture, but a final state of complete replacement.

Note NYT is saying that Latinos insist on genocide of all other genes by future Latino immigration.  NYT says other genes can only survive by ejecting all Latinos because Latinos insist on genocide and have a program of genocide.  NYT is saying Latinos won’t let others coexist with them in equilibrium but insist on perpetual immigration to genocide all other genes completely.  Moreover, NYT says its either fight this and remove them all or give in and submit to genocide.  Those are the only two choices according to NYT.  (NYT is in effect saying Latinos hate all non-Latinos and are determined to genocide them and if any Latinos are left they will continue to try it.)

A semi-spoof with data to reject NYT and more math and theory is

CHCI FNMA swears in Hispanic Caucus Congress

January 8, 2009

The laxness towards the Constitution goes on in other ways besides the non-birth certificate President.  Hispanic members of Congress are sworn in offsite at the meeting of a non US government entity by a federal judge. This is improper.

“United States District Judge Hilda Tagle swears-in Hispanic Members of Congress”

A federal judge swears in Hispanic members of Congress offsite at the meeting of CHCI which is a legal entity that is not part of the federal government.

“The Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute (CHCI) is one of the leading Hispanic non-profit and non-partisan 501(c) (3) organizations in the country. ”

So its not any part of the US government. So why does a federal judge go there and swear in members of Congress?

FNMA sponsored this swearing in January 2003. Scroll down to the bottom. This was before the bailout. Should private companies sponsor the swearing in of members of Congress by a federal judge? There is a real attitude here of you can pick and choose what parts of America you want and just cash in. No country can last with that attitude.

Comment posted at


CHCI list from link farther up:

Joining Chairman-elect Rodriguez and Rep. Silvestre Reyes in the 108th session of the U.S. Congress are Rep. Aníbal Acevedo-Vilá (D-PR); Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA); Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA); Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-TX); Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-CA); Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL); Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL); Rep. Charles Gonzalez (D-TX); Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ); Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL); Rep. Rubén Hinojosa (D-TX); Rep. Robert Menendez (D-NJ); Rep. Grace Napolitano (D-CA); Rep. Solomon P. Ortiz (D-TX); Rep. Ed Pastor (D-AZ); Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX); Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL); Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA); Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA); Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA); Rep. Jose E. Serrano (D-NY); Rep. Hilda L. Solis (D-CA); and Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D-NY). United States District Judge Hilda G. Tagle officiateed the swearing-in ceremony.

Lawrence Auster at View from the Right

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the Hispanic/African-American/Asian-Pacific/Lesbian-Gay-Transgendered/Disabled States of America

Carol Iannone writes:

I just saw a glimpse of the opening ceremony of the Hispanic caucus in the House.

Pelosi came in 2007.  FNMA sponsored it.

Illegal Immigration is Literal Hispanic Supremacy

December 14, 2007

The Supremacy Clause is the common name given to Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, which reads:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Supremacy Clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. treaties as “the supreme law of the land.” The Constitution is the highest form of law in the American legal system. State judges are required to uphold it, even if state laws or constitutions conflict with it.

Hispanics assert, by the term undocumented and the like that they have the right to immigrate illegally and get amnesty for it. That is to assert that Hispanics are supreme to the US Constitution and US laws. They are asserting a Hispanic Supremacy Doctrine, that Hispanics are supreme to the law of the land and are not bound by laws they don’t wish to be bound by, including the right to enter the United States.

They also, by the Univision Spanish Debate and Spanish language everywhere have asserted the right to change the language, culture and genes of the United States. This is Hispanic Supremacy.

Their assertion of a right to immigration asserts the right to cause complete white extinction.

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

As pointed out in the neighboring post:

The theorem doesn’t say you get a mixture of old and new. The theorem says you get complete replacement of the old by the new. The old goes extinct. This is pure genetic replacement. It doesn’t matter if there is an intermediate mixture or not. Over time, the initial stock is replaced completely. Promises of a mixture are false.

Immigration, by this theorem, is also an assertion of Hispanic supremacy. The way that Jorge Ramos and others like Maria Hinojosa also convey Latino and Hispanic Supremacy. The name La Raza conveys that. Maria Hinojosa has accepted an award from La Raza.

Maria Hinojosa and Jorge Ramos have no fear and are shameless. They realize that whites are frozen in fear like deers in the headlight. They realize they can extinct whites if they act quickly now. The very title of PBS Now the show where Maria Hinojosa vents her Latina Supremacy conveys their realization of their chance and their seizing the moment. Maria Hinojosa doesn’t waste any time calling Ron Paul’s supporters white supremacist and smearing Paul with that. This is because she knows Ron Paul like all whites is full of fear and easily taken advantage of to the point of genetic extinction.

Latino Supremacy is not just asserting the right to take the land, speak Spanish and extinct all white genes. Latino Supremacy is the boldness to do it and cow us in fear. We are afraid. But in this contest the side that loses its fear or rises above it is the one that wins. There is no time now.

The fate of North America forever is being determined now. This is the time to preserve a white majority by stopping all immigration or allow complete white genetic extinction by allowing immigration to continue. The Wright Island Model theorem states that is the choice.

To be or not to be. That is literally the choice for white genes now. The answer of Maria Hinojosa and Jorge Ramos is extinction of all white genes. Not a mixture, complete replacement according to the Wright Island Model.

If we continue in fear, we go extinct. We don’t survive in a mixture, we go extinct completely. We have to stop being afraid of being called white nationalist or white supremacist. The theorem says we are going extinct and Maria Hinojosa and Jorge Ramos know it. We have to speak up now and lose or overcome our fear.

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Illegal immigration is asserting Hispanic Legal Supremacy.  It is a doctrine of Hispanic legal supremacy.  So is affirmative action, welfare, and all forms of assistance and legal and illegal immigration themselves.

Univision Hispanic Nationalist or Supremacist?

December 14, 2007

Was the Univision Republican President Debate a Hispanic nationalist or even Hispanic Supremacist event? The same applies to the Univision Democratic Debate.

The Univision Debate demanded one way migration forever. This was advocating genetic replacement. The Wright Island Model makes that clear.

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.”

The theorem doesn’t say you get a mixture of old and new. The theorem says you get complete replacement of the old by the new. The old goes extinct. This is pure genetic replacement. It doesn’t matter if there is an intermediate mixture or not. Over time, the initial stock is replaced completely. Promises of a mixture are false.

Isn’t advocating the genetic extinction of every gene in whites a form of Hispanic supremacism? Do so-called white supremacists or nationalists advocate genetic extinction of other groups? The Hispanics are not saying keep the best genes, or the high IQ genes or resistance to disease genes. They are saying wipe out every single white gene in America, good or bad.

Jorge Ramos was a main organizer of the Univision Debate. Ramos is a Mexican national. The debate didn’t have any means for English speakers to follow along at the time. They had to wait for a transcript later. This gave an edge to Spanish speakers to blog on it on the internet.

univision debate

Michelle Malkin (well known Bubba KKKer , you can’t tell under the sheets at the meetings?)

Furthermore, does Jorge Ramos, a Mexican citizen, have any business being one of the moderators of an American political debate?

In an interview several months back, Ramos gloated that

“…all the time we [Hispanics] are more numerous, richer, all the time we gain more acquisitive [sic—or maybe not] power, all the time we are stronger politically, and all the time we are taking over the United States more…I think that the growth of the Latino Community is unstoppable, but there is much to correct, especially, the cases of rejection and persecution against other Latinos, but we’re doing well, definitely.” [Jorge Ramos y el libro que lo hizo llorar. Nuevo Siglo, August 24, 2007

Hispanics usually don’t stop at Hispanic nationalism but go directly to Hispanic supremacism? The GOP Spanish debate was not about assimilation in its form or content. This was about compelling attendance under their rules by the presidential candidates. They said attend or be called white nationalist or white supremacist. They are already going after Ron Paul that way. Tom Tancredo has been attacked that way for a long time.

The GOP Univision Debate was Hispanic supremacism in form and content. It was intentionally saying you must do these things or be labeled a bigot, nativist, white nationalist or white supremacist. If you don’t attend in Spanish you are a bigot and nativist. This was the threat.

This was a powerful moment in American history in the intention of the debate organizers. This was the end of the white and English era and the transition to the Hispanic and Spanish era. The debate organizers were giddy as the founding fathers of a new nation, born in their debate, immigration, superior and conquering birth rate.

They asserted their right to ignore our laws on immigration because they didn’t assent to them. They assert that any law not passed by Hispanic majorities is not a valid law and is not the law of this land. They asserted Hispanic Supremacism over the Constitution and the law.

They demand that all candidates and elected officials and everyone assent to Hispanic supremacism in the form of the right to immigrate illegally and get amnesty and welfare. They assert the right of Hispanics to live here illegally, get welfare and in-state college tuition and evade the laws they please such as military service.

They call anyone opposed to denying any benefit or opportunity to Hispanic illegals, a nativist, bigot, white nationalist and white supremacist. They make this clear. They demand Spanish language everywhere. They have made corporations and government and non-profits bow to them. Press 1 for English, 2 for Hispanic Supremacism. That is the message on every corporate and government answering system in the country they have gotten their hands on.

The same was their theory in court cases where they claim illegals have standing to sue and can remain anonymous. These are Hispanic supremacist lawsuits.

The PBS Now show did a Ron Paul segment.

They brought up the white supremacism issue and dismissed any references to white or the Celtic cross as evidence of white supremacism. They forced Ron Paul to disavow the people themselves. The person doing this was herself a Hispanic supremacist? Or at least Hispanic nationalist? As are most Hispanic journalists and politicians? Or professors?

search PBS Now Latino

Is Maria Hinojosa a Hispanic nationalist or Hispanic supremacist? She prefers the word Latino? Is that itself used as a word for Latino nationalism or Latino supremacism?

Maria Hinojosa (born 1961 in Mexico City) is a television journalist. Her first journalism experience was as host of a Latino radio show as a student at Barnard College, where she graduated magna cum laude with a degree in Latin American studies.

In 1995, Hinojosa began hosting the National Public Radio show Latino USA. She hosted the WNBC-TV public affairs show Visiones before joining CNN in 1997, where she worked for the New York City bureau for eight years and became known for reporting urban issues.

She has won many honors and awards, including being named one of the 100 Most Influential Hispanics by Hispanic Business magazine, the Robert F. Kennedy award, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists‘ Radio Award, the New York Society of Professional Journalists Deadline Award, the National Council of La Raza‘s Ruben Salazar Communications Award, and an Associated Press award.

La Raza is considered by many a Latino supremacist organization. The name itself, The Race, is Latino supremacist.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Isn’t this the policy of La Raza and all Latino journalists? They insist on sustained immigration, which mathematically causes the complete extinction of all white genes. That makes them Latino Supremacists in a way more radical than those they label white nationalist or white supremacist. For them someone who tries to stop the extinction of all white genes is a white nationalist or white supremacist. This is a Marxist abuse of language.

search Maria Hinojosa immigration

Joe Guzzardi at Vdare has written about her.

In the end, “Immigrant Nation, Divided Country,” revealed Hinojosa, winner of the National Council of La Raza Ruben Salazar Award, as a shameless Mexican mouthpiece. Hinojosa showed her true colors in pre and post-documentary interviews.

Proving that her ethnic identity politics should have disqualified her from reporting on the wave of illegal aliens in Georgia, Hinosoja told Atlanta Latino that she was surprised to find that Atlanta has become a “mini-Mexico” and that “as a Mexican” the “immigrants are my countrymen and countrywomen.

She identifies as a Mexican. That makes her a Mexican nationalist. She insists on the right of Mexican immigration into America, legally or not, and that makes her a Mexican supremacist. She advocates that Mexican desires or “needs” trump American law. That is Mexican supremacism. She herself extends her advocacy for the right to immigrate and to cause white extinction and to do so against US laws or the wishes of the American people to all Latinos. That makes her a Latino Supremacist.

Finally, Hinojosa plays the immigration enthusiast’s trump card…that immigration reformers are just Nazis.

This exchange took place between Hinosoja and fellow CNN anchor Kelli Arena:

Arena: I notice you didn’t use the term illegal immigrant. There’s even some controversy over that term itself, isn’t there?

HINOJOSA: Absolutely. Well, the people who are fighting against these immigrants, and they wouldn’t even say that they’re immigrants, they called them illegal aliens and that’s the only term they will use. That’s a very controversial term. If you listen to the teachings of Eli Wiesel, who won a Nobel Peace Prize, he was a survivor of the Holocaust. He always said that there is no such thing as an illegal human being. There can be an illegal action, what they have done is criminal. But to call them illegal is—once you label somebody illegal, it sets up perhaps what he says the potential of declaring these people illegal, and therefore the result was, in his case, the Holocaust.”

She was saying Ron Paul was identified with white supremacists by taking their donations, or implied that strongly by her questions and tone of voice. But she took an award from La Raza, whose name is The Race. Ron Paul said he didn’t have time to research the donations. She certainly knew she was taking an award from La Raza. Ron Paul didn’t go give a talk and take an award from a group called The White Race and advocate policies proven to cause the genetic extinction of every Hispanic gene, good or bad. Hasn’t she done that towards whites? By taking the La Raza award didn’t she acknowledge she is a Latino Supremacist? Hasn’t she advocated policies proven in math and science journals to cause the extinction of every white gene in America?

Math says that Hispanic immigration is a genetic extinction event that is ongoing. Links to academic papers on the Wright Island Model are below:

The above is draft and preliminary. This is subject to review. All statements should be restated as hypotheses or questions. This includes all characterization of any person or organization. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: