Archive for the 'Islamofascism' Category

Islam is a fusion of religion, political, and military

January 22, 2011

Islam does not deserve protection of the First Amendment because it is a fusion of religion, political aims and military methods. Muslims are soldiers of their religion in a literal sense, unlike in other religions.

If something X is part religion,R, and part political, P, in such a way that the P is not removable from the X or separable from the R then the whole thing does not get the benefits of the first amendment.

In terms of altering the West to its peril from Islam, we can simply point out this fused nature. This is why Islam does not get the benefit of religious protection laws. This is why Muslims can not stay in the West.

Islam was designed to be a unitary system of religion, justice, law, theology, politics, military, economics, finance, etc.

This is why Islamic Finance exists. Google it. This is why there are Islamic financial products.

“Islamic financial products”
About 417,000 results (0.32 seconds)

Stated another way, the unitary nature of Islam that includes politics, military, law, etc. makes it Islamo-fascism.

Benito Mussolini Definitions of Fascism

The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State—a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values—interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.

Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his immanent relationship with a superior law and with an objective Will that transcends the particular individual and raises him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. Whoever has seen in the religious politics of the Fascist regime nothing but mere opportunism has not understood that Fascism besides being a system of government is also, and above all, a system of thought.

Liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the XXth century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the ‘right’, a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the ‘collective’ century, and therefore the century of the State.

So fascism is where individual liberty as in the First Amendment does not apply. That applies to freedom of religion and expression. Both are not free under Islamic Republics.

Islam is fascist as defined above.


Rawstory Comments Hate Map of Ground Zero Site

September 10, 2010

Rawstory has a hate thread of comments on Fox’s map of the body parts around Ground Zero.

9/11/2001 was done by Muslims, but the hate that brought them here after the WTC 1993 attacks is shown in the Lib comments on this hate thread.

Islam and Liberalism are matched as Twin Hates against White Christian America as shown on this hate thread at Raw Story. Just as the Twin Towers loomed over New York at equal height, so the Twin Hates of Liberalism and Islam tower over New York and America in both the Ground Zero Mosque debate and the Pastor Terry Jones Koran burning debate.

Liberalism adopting Muslim hate and making Muslim immigration sacred shows that Liberalism wants to kill the West and the White Race and Christianity.

Islamo-Liberalism is the fusion hate of the White Race, the White West, and White Christian America.

“The Grand Ayatollah Behind the Curtain”

October 28, 2006

By Colbert I. King
Saturday, October 28, 2006; Page A15

WaPo Comments.

Excellent column Mr. King. We are fighting to uphold Sharia law and religious courts of an Islamic Republic in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

Did we invade Germany in WWII to uphold fascist law, fascist courts, and to set up the Fascist Republic of Germany? Bush would have.

Because Bush is fighting to build an Islamic Republic and uphold the rulings of religous courts and law, America can’t win. If we win, we create what is against us. Bush has set up a no win situation.

Americans realize this and don’t want to fight a war to uphold religious laws and courts that conflict with our values. Americans don’t want to volunteer to die to uphold the rulings of religious courts in Iraq. Bush doesn’t realize this. Why?

This article is speculation, hypotheses or opinion. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: