Archive for the 'Islam’s War on the West' Category

Dominique Strauss-Kahn accuser is Muslim from Ghana

May 16, 2011

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2011/05/16/2011-05-16_imf_chief_dominique_strausskahn_charged_with_sexually_assaulting_maid_in_nyc_hot.html?page=1

She always wore an Islamic headscarf and worked long hours.

DSK is in a sense the world’s top Jewish official. What is the chance that the Jewish head of the IMF would be falsely accused by a Muslim from Ghana, a former French colony?

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/CAR071609B.htm

Adjustment program

In June 2009, the authorities adopted new budget measures to ensure that the 2009 deficit target is met. Given the limited scope to expand public borrowing, Ghana has no scope for countercyclical fiscal policy, and the government stands ready to cut spending further if the slowing economy leads to revenue shortfalls.

In other words, the IMF put this woman out of work in 2009 and then she came to NYC? Or put her family out of work?

==

Post I submitted at New York Post, part appeared, presumably hitting the word limit.

“She always wore an Islamic headscarf and worked long hours.” DSK is in a certain sense the top Jewish official in the world.

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/CAR071609B.htm

IMF imposes austerity on Ghana. She is from Ghana. Perhaps she had to leave Ghana because of IMF policies or blames them.

“IMF support is being provided under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Under the PRGF-supported program, the government is targeting a substantial phased reduction of the fiscal deficit. This would cut public sector borrowing and allow Ghana to reverse the sharp deterioration in the public debt-to-GDP ratio since 2006 (see Box 1).”

“Ghana’s inflation—already higher than the African average—rose from the 10 percent range in 2007 to more than 20 percent by early 2009. ”

“The fiscal deficit, which had already risen to 9 percent of GDP in 2007, rose to 14½ percent of GDP in 2008,”

This could be revenge on the IMF for imposing deficit reduction on Ghana’s government leading to unemployment. She may blame the Jews and DSK in particular for this, thinking the Jews run the IMF.

==
Posted in discussion thread at New York Post

The Muslim maid from Ghana may be retaliating for IMF imposed austerity on Ghana in 2009, leading to a cut in government spending and thus higher unemployment. DSK has immunity for retaliation against IMF policy by this woman from Ghana. IMF austerity imposed on Ghana: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/CAR071609B.htm

==

http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=2524954#2524954

==

http://inwent-iij-lab.org/Weblog/2009/04/24/ghana-considers-going-back-to-imf-loans/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/18/ghana-economy-imf-polly-toynbee

“Wall Street wounded Ghana. IMF tonic could hurt it more”

Polly Toynbee in Accra
The Guardian, Saturday 18 April 2009

==

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/malinvestments/no-immuity-for-the-champagne-socialist/

Actually, DSK may have a good case for diplomatic immunity. The hotel maid is a headscarf wearing Muslim from Ghana. The IMF has imposed austerity on Ghana.

“Wall Street wounded Ghana. IMF tonic could hurt it more”

Polly Toynbee in Accra
The Guardian, Saturday 18 April 2009

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm…

Search IMF loans Ghana for more. IMF austerity loan package link at IMFhttp://www.imf.org/external… discuss imposing austerity on the government. This may have led to unemployment. The Muslim maid have left Ghana and come to NYC because of this austerity. She may blame the IMF. This allows DSK to claim diplomatic immunity for this revenge against IMF policy.

Advertisements

Harddrivers want the bin Laden hard drive released

May 3, 2011

Release the hard drive. This is a true where is Wikileaks when you need them moment.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8489425/Osama-bin-Laden-dead-US-retrieves-hard-drive-with-information-on-deputys-location.html

This hard drive has to frighten the leadership of the establishment conspiracy, from Islamabad to Washington.

Al Qaeda flows into Obama’s Libya Qadmire

May 3, 2011

Libya is the new Qaeda Qaddafi Quagmire Q3 as we Quers or Qadmirers call it.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/0503/Libyan-rebel-says-Osama-bin-Laden-s-death-won-t-stop-jihadist-flow

Libyan rebel says Osama bin Laden’s death won’t stop jihadist flow

‘Al Qaeda [is] getting more and more organized and bringing people [to Libya] from abroad,’ says the rebel, who has been contacted by militants wanting to fight against Col. Muammar Qaddafi.

Obama’s Muslim love lives on. Just as Bush’s did. With us paying the price for the lie that is Peaceful Islam and Muslim Nation Building with the peaceful women respecting Muslim Brotherhood.

This whole war with Islam thing is turning into one giant Qadmire from Pakistan to Indonesia and from Afghanistan to Londonistan and then to America. It is so 7th century. So El Cid. So Reconquista. So now.

The Pakistan USG MSM teachable lying moment

May 3, 2011

Pakistan is caught holding bin Laden in a safe house of its ISI and next to the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) and Pakistan, United States government and the MSM all lie and say it isn’t holding him. They are lying to our face. The MSM then calls us names like conspiracy nut, birther, Trumper, bigot, racist, Islamophobe, etc. to silence us.

The MSM plays the role of the KGB. They subject us to fear so that we become silent in public or official matters. They operate on the view that Auster expresses, it is what you say in public that matters. It is not your private or mental reservations or what you say in private. Although the KGB extended its actions there to. As we see in prosecutions in the UK and child custody cases, they can extend their reach there as well.

So what name do we give people who believe that Pakistan was holding bin Laden? Holder is the name of the Attorney General. We can say they harbored him. Harborers? Accessory after the fact theorists? This is conspiracy in the law.

I proclaim myself a Harborer. A Harborer is someone who believes the government of Pakistan was harboring bin Laden. This is a narrow Harborer. A full blown case of Harboring Theory is that Pakistan was doing the same for al Qaeda, and still is. A Full Harborer (why is birther not capitalized or is it?) also believes that the reason Pakistan harbored bin Laden and still harbors al Qaeda is because they were part of the original 9/11 conspiracy.

The next step is to add the anthrax attacks in. The next step is to say that as 9/11 started to unfold, the US government and then the MSM did the same thing they are doing now right in our face. They covered up the obvious role of Pakistan and that Pakistan was getting a payoff of the lifting of sanctions on its nuclear program for its support of the 9/11 attacks. This is born again harboring. I proclaim myself and freely admit that I am a Born Again Harborer.

Wise as Serpent Harborers know that the MSM is lying to us and is working for the government to hector us into silence. We know that the MSM lies when it says it is the giver of truth. We know the MSM lies when it says it is on our side against government. We know that the MSM as it goes back and forth to be the President’s Press Secretary is just the official mouth piece of the government. It is the same. This is why its sales volume is going down in part.

==
Vanishing American has a column from last evening calling this process in front of us gaslighting.

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2011/05/all-conspiracy-theories-are-not-equal.html

My comment there:

I think gaslighting is a proper word for what is going on in front of us. Pakistan’s role is being white washed yet again with the MSM playing the enforcer role of calling us names. Gaslighting Media or Gaslighting Stream Media are new names for them and what they do. They are the Gaslighters not us. Although they will want Gaslighter to mean a conspiracy nut who thinks they are the Gaslighters.

I wrote my blog article today before reading yours. It is somewhat similar in its conclusion although more focused on Pakistan. I pronounce myself a Harborer, someone who believes Pakistan was harboring bin Laden. Not only that I am a full blown Harborer who thinks that Pakistan was in on the original 9/11 attacks to get the sanctions lifted on its nuclear program and that this is the reason they harbored bin Laden and still harbor al Qaeda.

I would add the real gaslighting is that them and their Islam in our lands is peaceful or good for us. Which is part of their larger lie that immigration is good for us. The truth is them and their Islam out of our lands is what is not just good for us, but our only path to survival.

==

Safe Houser is an alternative term to Harborer. WND is using the term safe house for the bin Laden Abbottabad compound. This term works as well.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=294193

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8489425/Osama-bin-Laden-dead-US-retrieves-hard-drive-with-information-on-deputys-location.html

“Although Monday’s operation was primarily a Find, Fix, Finish mission to kill bin Laden, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, it has also yielded intelligence.”

If they had not used an explosion, presumably to blow up the compound?, but had scaled the walls, they could have taken bin Laden alive? It is a house without a phone. So it couldn’t call for help.

==

Al Qaeda’s idea of independent cells or franchises has not worked out. The cells are just not that good at terrorism. They are also underfunded and lack experience and sophistication. Without a franchising organization to provide services and management, it doesn’t work. Like so many startups, al Qaeda is a business failure. Pakistan as a rogue terrorist sponsoring state though is another matter. It is the difference for the 9/11 and likely the anthrax attacks.

==

A Harborer or Safe Houser, not only believes that Pakistan was harboring bin Laden in a safe house, but that the US Government and MSM are now in a conspiracy to lie about this to us and make us sound like nuts to say it.

Pastor Terry Jones Fran Ingram Ten Reasons to Burn a Koran

September 11, 2010

Note that the Ten Reasons to Burn a Koran was written by Fran Ingram not Pastor Terry Jones.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/017293.html

N. at Vdare provided following link that Lawrence Auster posted. Auster supports the Koran burning by Pastor Terry Jones, even though Jones is off it appears. However, Bob Old and the Phelps family at Westboro Baptist Church are saying they will burn a Koran today. Bob Old says at noon and will post video on Youtube of it.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DJVLrwTrFVkJ:www.doveworld.org/blog/ten-reasons-to-burn-a-koran+doveworld&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

=Fran Ingram:

Home » Blogs » Fran Ingram’s blog » Ten Reasons to Burn a Koran
Ten Reasons to Burn a Koran

By Fran Ingram – Posted on 02 September 2010

On 9/11/10 we are burning Korans to raise awareness and warn. In a sense it is neither an act of love nor of hate. We see, as we state in the Ten Reasons below, that Islam is a danger. We are using this act to warn about the teaching and ideology of Islam, which we do hate as it is hateful. We do not hate any people, however. We love, as God loves, all the people in the world and we want them to come to a knowledge of the truth. To warn of danger and harm is a loving act. God is love and truth. If you know the truth it can set you free. The world is in bondage to the massive grip of the lies of Islam. These are:

One

The Koran teaches that Jesus Christ, the Crucified, Risen Son of God, King of Kings and Lord of Lords was NOT the Son of God, nor was he crucified (a well documented historical fact that ONLY Islam denies). This teaching removes the possibility of salvation and eternal life in heaven for all Islam’s believers. They face eternal damnation in hell if they do not repent.

Two

The Koran does not have an eternal origin. It is not recorded in heaven. The Almighty God, Creator of the World, is NOT it’s source. It is not holy. It’s writings are human in origin, a concoction of old and new teachings. This has been stated and restated for centuries by scholars since Islam’s beginnings, both Moslem and non-Moslem.

Three

The Koran’s teaching includes Arabian idolatry, paganism, rites and rituals. These are demonic, an ongoing satanic stronghold under which Moslems and the world suffer.

Four

The earliest writings that are known to exist about the Prophet Mohammad were recorded 120 years after his death. All of the Islamic writings (the Koran and the Hadith, the biographies, the traditions and histories) are confused, contradictory and inconsistent. Maybe Mohammad never existed. We have no conclusive account about what he said or did. Yet Moslems follow the destructive teachings of Islam without question.

Five

Mohammad’s life and message cannot be respected. The first Meccan period of his leadership seems to have been religiously motivated and a search for the truth. But in the second Medina period he was “corrupted by power and worldly ambitions.” (Ibn Warraq) These are characteristics that God hates. They also led to political assassinations and massacres which continue to be carried out on a regular basis by his followers today.

Six

Islamic Law is totalitarian in nature. There is no separation of church and state. It is irrational. It is supposedly immutable and cannot be changed. It must be accepted without criticism. It has many similarities to Nazism, Communism and Fascism. It is not compatible with Western Civilization.

Seven

Islam is not compatible with democracy and human rights. The notion of a moral individual capable of making decisions and taking responsibility for them does not exist in Islam. The attitude towards women in Islam as inferior possessions of men has led to countless cases of mistreatment and abuse for which Moslem men receive little or no punishment, and in many cases are encouraged to commit such acts, and are even praised for them. This is a direct fruit of the teachings of the Koran.

Eight

A Muslim does not have the right to change his religion. Apostasy is punishable by death.

Nine

Deep in the Islamic teaching and culture is the irrational fear and loathing of the West.

Ten

Islam is a weapon of Arab imperialism and Islamic colonialism. Wherever Islam has or gains political power, Christians, Jews and all non-Moslems receive persecution, discrimination, are forced to convert. There are massacres and churches, synagogues, temples and other places of worship are destroyed.

From Acts 19 (Amplified)

18Many also of those who were now believers came making full confession and thoroughly exposing their [former deceptive and evil] practices.

19And many of those who had practiced curious, magical arts collected their books and [throwing them, book after book, on the pile] burned them in the sight of everybody. When they counted the value of them, they found it amounted to 50,000 pieces of silver (about $9,300).

20Thus the Word of the Lord [concerning the attainment through Christ of eternal salvation in the kingdom of God] grew and spread and intensified, prevailing mightily.

Like the Christians in Acts 19, we are publicly burning a book that is demonic. Many of our greatest supporters are ex-Moslems. They know these evils first hand. We are not, like the Nazis, stealing books, destroying properties or harming any people. We are not Nazis nor are we like Nazis. The Christians in Acts 19 did not go on from their scroll burning to harm anyone. They used the public burning as an opportunity, a demonstration to preach the truth. Only to preach and leave the decision of whether to follow the truth or not.

Do not forget POINT SIX. Islam (not us) is totalitarian in nature, like Nazism, Communism, and Fascism. This evil nature of Islam needs to be seen. Moslems around the world burn and kill on a regular basis, every week, properties and people. All you have to do is follow the news. The many death threats we are receiving, the warnings about terror attacks also prove our point. Do Christians make these threats when Bibles or churches are burned? No.

We have fallen asleep since 9/11/01 and have been hoodwinked by the growth of a (for now) non violent Islam. Shall we give in to threats, then, and allow Islam to grow in America unopposed? We at Dove World Outreach Center will not, even if it costs us our lives. For those who support us, we say thank you for standing with us in courage. For those who oppose us, we say wake up and do not give in to the fear and lies!

International Burn a Koran Day on Facebook

For more on Islam and the Burn a Koran Day, see our blog and leave comments here: http://islamisofthedevil.com/blog

(The post continues at the link)
==

Others standing with Pastor Terry Jones in some way are Jihad Watch, Gates of Vienna, and Diana West. Those who have supported the Koran burning itself include Lawrence Auster, Laura Wood, and some posters or commenters at all of those sites.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/017272.html

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/09/on-burning-sacred-texts/

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/09/kumbaya-diplomacy/#more-15202

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/09/when-rhinoceroses-rule/

Links to Diana West articles on this

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/pastor-terry-jones-a-modern-day-prophet-of-god/

Jihad Watch and Gates of Vienna have many threads with excellent comments on them.

Gates Vienna archives are hard to find so I post a couple links

==

Old Atlantic Lighthouse said…

The Baron’s original post is proven better with each hour of news hysteria over the Koran burning. I have tried the Baron’s comparison out on someone who lived during WWII and they agree with the point.

Moreover, Hollywood really was ridiculing Nazism, Hitler and Mein Kampf all through the war. Germany never threatened to retaliate against American POWs because of Hollywood movies depicting Nazis badly.

Hollywood during WWII was semi-official propaganda. This is a single pastor in Florida with a congregation of 50.

To reiterate the main message brilliantly shown by the Baron.
The White House is saying its only a few radicals in caves that we are fighting. They say its not Islam we are fighting. They said this morning that this one pastor will take back all our work in Afghanistan. (I couldn’t confirm that statement on the WH webpage.)

Petraeus and the White House are saying our troops will suffer from this single pastor’s Koran burning.
The comparison of all the Hollywood movies during WWII mocking Hitler and Nazism in comparison to this one pastor, the Danish Cartoons, etc. does in fact prove that we are fighting all of Islam. It also proves that this is the view of a greater percentage of Muslims today than of Nazis during WWII. It shows a greater percentage of Muslims today want our utter destruction and our implacably against us than Nazis during WWII.
9/08/2010 7:04 AM
Blogger Zenster said…

Old Atlantic Lighthouse: The comparison of all the Hollywood movies during WWII mocking Hitler and Nazism in comparison to this one pastor, the Danish Cartoons, etc. does in fact prove that we are fighting all of Islam. It also proves that this is the view of a greater percentage of Muslims today than of Nazis during WWII. It shows a greater percentage of Muslims today want our utter destruction and [are] implacably against us than Nazis during WWII. [emphasis added]

This is an excellent observation and also an important logical extension of the Baron’s superb history lesson.

WHERE ARE ALL THE “MODERATE” MUSLIMS WHO SHOULD BE RALLYING TO ASSURE US THAT BURNING THE QUR’AN IS NOT A REASON TO COMMIT MURDER?

Once the “moderate” Muslim street remains deafening silent.

How much longer are we to tolerate this intentionally deceptive farce of Muslim “moderation”?

This is yet one more sterling opportunity for Muslims to come out against Islamic intolerance. Instead, they are milking this like the last cow on the farm.
9/08/2010 1:29 PM
Blogger Zenster said…

I’m going to cross-post my latest comment in the Why Do Our Soldiers Fight? thread:

As a dedicated bibliophile, I feel obliged to go on the record yet one more time about how reluctant I am to encourage book burning.

But let there be no dispute that it is a person’s most basic right to burn whatever book they own whenever they want to.

That said, there remains one unequivocal fact:

THERE ARE FEW MORE EXPLICIT AND NON-LETHAL WAYS OF INFORMING ISLAM JUST HOW CLEARLY IT SKIRTS TOTAL ANNIHILATION THAN BY BURNING THE QUR’AN.

Burning this piece of ideological filth is a direct message and straight-forward object lesson regarding what all Muslims should anticipate if they refuse to abandon jihad.

BURNING QUR’ANS → BURNING MUSLIM CITIES

Either Muslims begin to make this connection or understand that they will have no reason to complain when Damascus, Islamabad, Ankara, Kabul, Tripoli, Riyadh, Baghdad, Tehran, Cairo and other Muslim cities go up in flames.

In my own mind, it is not a question of “if” but when this will happen. The only real question is whether conventional or unconventional weapons will be involved.
9/08/2010 1:53 PM
Blogger Old Atlantic Lighthouse said…

Zenster, thank you for your kind words and your powerful posts. I appreciate your highlighting from my posts as well as in your own well thought out and structured comments.

We are submitting to Islam with the reaction of our government. Burning the Koran as you point out is how we send a message of victory instead of defeat to the Muslim world.

That is precisely the message our elites won’t send because they don’t want us to win. Our winning would be a victory for unreconstructed White bigots. This they can not be for. They want us to lose. This is the message the Muslims and we both hear.
9/08/2010 4:01 PM

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/09/fear-of-nazi-street.html#readfurther

There are other good comments by Zenster at several threads. These should be collected onto a blog so as not to be lost. Some more Zenster comments here:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-do-our-soldiers-fight.html?showComment=1283944694708

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/florida-pastor-says-imam-lied-to-him-about-ground-zero-mosque-deal.html#comments

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/islamic-supremacist-ground-zero-imam-says-no-deal-to-move-mosque.html#comments

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/petraeus-on-quran-burning-reinforces-lesson-that-if-islamic-supremacists-are-sufficiently-violent-we.html#comments

There are others at Gates of Vienna, Jihad Watch, Lawrence Auster, and likely Diana West and Laura Wood as well as other sites.

Hate threads at Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/islam-controversies-cast-shadow-911-events/

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/pastor-mad-needs-help-daughter/

Some patriot voices at WaPo thread:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2010/09/obama_and_the_right_to_burn_th.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Note Old Atlantic was banned at Raw Story and stealth banned at Washington Post.

Dutch judges rule Muslims can’t leave Islam

February 23, 2009

(Spoof) Dutch judges ruled today in the Geert Wilders trial that Muslims can not leave Islam and can not criticize or change Islam.

Wilders had made a motion that if the judges were to rule against him it would be tantamount to ruling that Muslims could not criticize their own religion and leave it.    What if a Muslim decided Islam was just a cult of the desert and decided it was false and stupid and a lie his lawyers asked.   What if he wanted to tell his friends and family his new insight? Isn’t every time a Muslim leaves Islam a statement by that Muslim that Islam is false?  Isn’t saying Islam is false an attack on Islam?

What if Saudi Arabia passed a law allowing all religions and criticism of any of them in any way. Suppose people in Arabia started mocking Islam and many left.  Isn’t that what we want?

The judges agreed.  They declared that Muslims can not leave Islam in Holland.  They said Muslims may not criticize Islam.

What about changing it the lawyers shouted?

No, Muslims can not change Islam because that is an attack on Islam.

Geert’s lawyer: So they must adhere to the form of Islam proclaimed by the government of Saudi Arabia without deviation?

Judges: yes.

Geert’s lawyer: And that applies world wide.

Judges:  yes.

Geert’s lawyer: Any anyone, Muslim or infidel who says otherwise will be put into prison in Holland or in any court adhering to the law, which is universal?

Judges:  Yes.  Islam is universal and the law must be as well.

Geert’s lawyer:  So Islam can’t be criticized even by Muslims and so can’t be changed, even by Muslims.  Only the original form of Islam can apply and no person can leave Islam anywhere in the world, because that would be to deny Islam.  This is the universal law everywhere in the world.

Judges: Yes.

==Motions to submit to the court for ruling

Can a Muslim leave Islam in Holland?

Can a Muslim have reasons for leaving Islam in Holland?

Can the reason a Muslim leaves Islam be that Islam is a wicked faith in that Muslim’s mind?

If that is the reason they want to leave, the true reason, then are they forbidden to leave Islam in Holland?

But if the reason they wanted to leave was to drink alcohol that would be allowed in Holland?

Can a person leave Islam and say the reason?

If the reason is Islam is a wicked faith can they say that?

If someone asks them why did you leave Islam can they answer?

Can they say, I think Islam is a wicked faith?

If they think Islam is the same as Nazism can they say it?

Can they even leave Islam if that is true, cross their heart hope to die, reason?

Before a person leaves Islam, can they say to others, Muslim or not, I am thinking of leaving Islam because I think

a) its like Nazism.

b) its a wicked faith.

c) it commands evil.

Can they discuss any of those reasons?

After they leave the faith can they say that is why?

Can they try to get other Muslims to leave Islam by saying their beliefs?

What about others?

What about those who believe Islam targets them?

Can they state their belief?

Can they try to get Muslims to leave or change Islam because of what they think Islam is?

Wasn’t all of the above allowed for those leaving Christianity over centuries?

Aren’t things like that about Christianity taught in schools, movies, newspapers, etc. in Holland and other Western lands?  Isn’t there a war on Christianity where anti-Christians can say anything they want against Christianity and attribute any bad thing to it?

These motions should be submitted to the court in the Netherlands in the Geert Wilders trial.

Doesn’t this show the real reason for the prosecution of Geert Wilders is because he is a white politician who the white establishment in the Netherlands loathe?  They loathe him for being loyal to whites and saying the truth about Islam and non-white immigration?  That is why he is being prosecuted?

==

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/02/geert-wilders-american-tour.html#readfurther

==

Comment posted Gates of Vienna

How can a person reform Islam if it can’t be criticized?

How can a person leave Islam if they can’t condemn Islam?

If a person thinks Islam is a wicked faith, is it illegal
for them to leave Islam in the Netherlands?

If that’s their true reason, they can’t leave Islam?

Or if they do, they can’t say it?  Even if asked?

Wilders should submit motions to the court asking above and other questions at my site.

Is it against the law in Holland for a person to leave Islam because they think Islam is a wicked faith?  Or they think its close to Nazism? Submit that to the court.

<a href=”https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/02/23/dutch-judges-rule-muslims-cant-leave-islam/”&gt;
More motions and questions </a>

Is the Dutch court ruling that:

  1. Islam can not be reformed
  2. because to reform Islam it must be criticized
  3. and criticizing Islam is illegal under Dutch law
  4. and therefore Islam can not be reformed.
  5. Since leaving Islam is a criticism of it, in fact is to condemn it, leaving Islam is also forbidden under Dutch law.
  6. Dutch law requires that Muslims not leave Islam and that Islam stay as the unreconstructed form of the original Koran and the original Muslim invasion of Europe.   That is Dutch law.

Geert Wilders Releases Fitna: The War of Islam on the West

March 27, 2008

Geert Wilders, one of the heros of Europe and the West’s fight in the war started by Islam in 622 A.D., Year 1 of the Muslim calendar has released his film Fitna on the current stage of this great war for planet earth.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7d9_1206624103

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3130 

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010231.html

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020472.php#comments 

The film is accurate. Will Muslims rage against the truth?

Posted by Robert at March 27, 2008 4:13 PM

This will not be the end of times, if we fight for our civilization, freedom and people and to maintain our ethnic hegemony in our own lands.  All of these are targeted for cleansing by Islam.

This is preliminary and draft.  This is subject to substantial revision.  All statements should be restated as questions.  This is part of a petition to Congress to adopt the position of Virginia Congressman Virgil Goode to stop Muslim immigration and of Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo to develop a credible retaliatory strategy towards attacks in the name of Islam.

%d bloggers like this: