Archive for the 'Jeffrey Imm' Category

Total equality is no equality and no liberty

February 2, 2010

Jeffrey Imm disputes the idea that partial inequality is optimal.

This in his discussion of Jared Taylor and the American Renaissance Conference that Imm at one time claimed to have gotten removed from the Dulles Westin.  The phrase partial equality appeared in my earlier post. we can form a measure of

I started with the title for the post that equality, liberty and diversity are not compatible with the others.  This is in the sense that each is a cost to the other.  Diversity is itself a bad not a good.  This is shown by history, Putnam’s study, the attempts of people to live with their own, voting for their own for office, etc.  It is embedded genetically in us.  It is not limited to humans, although some species are less sociable.

In writing the post, I realized, however that the relationship was not in one direction between equality and liberty.   Excessive equality will clearly make Liberty impossible.  This is true of any system, it doesn’t have to be humans.  Take a set of numbers, two will suffice.  If the numbers are equal, the degrees of freedom of one is not two.  Thus equality has eliminated liberty completely.  This applies by induction to a set of n numbers.

We can then extend this to anything we can measure by numbers.  Partial equality would be a state where the set of numbers are partially constrained but not fully constrained.  Thus a departure from equality is necessary for liberty.

However, extreme inequality in human societies also reduces liberty.  Think of a set of particles.  If one particle has all the kinetic energy and momentum then the others are at rest.  Thus extreme inequality causes almost a total loss of liberty.

Money or wealth can substitute for energy.  In a society where one person owns everything, liberty is low for the rest.  Thus extreme inequality can reduce the number of degrees of freedom of the social system and thus of liberty.

If liberty is extreme, then equality will be low.

Equality is zero is no real desirable equality, particularly if it means equality in the form of equal non-existence.  That is what immigration gives us, see the Wright Island Model discussion below.

To summarize:

Liberty implies inequality.  So inequality is a necessary but not sufficient condition for liberty.  Liberty and equality are not consistent.  a large dose of one implies a substantial shortfall in the other.  Some states of inequality may imply a low level of liberty,
in particular extreme inequality implies low liberty.

So we are left with moderate inequality if we want substantial liberty.  But an excess of inequality will work against  liberty.

Moreover, search is part of optimality.  Randomness is necessary for dealing with high dimensional problems.  Human society is a high dimensional problem.  It requires search.  But it also requires keeping good searches not losing them to theft or chaos.  That is where diversity comes in, especially for whites.   Third worlders destroy the results of successful search by white societies, including of genes favorable to white concepts of civilization.

This is seen in schools, areas that were white and then ethnically cleansed by non-whites, etc.  Posner has commented on the loss of competence in our country.  This is caused by diversity.  Corruption has been associated with diversity.  Putnam has documented that diversity, especially adding non-whites to white societies increases distrust.  This is no surprise since it increases measured social dysfunction.

Black crime has been documented as consistently very high for over 100 years.  Jared Taylor has contributed to that analysis.

== Some links from above article

“Will Education Solve The Race Problem?
By Professor John Roach Straton, Of Mercer University”

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites

I work out from BJS DOJ stats that the average of violent
crimes per black man is 4 to 8 over his lifetime.

Jared Taylor “Color of Crime”


Diversity harms liberty for whites.  It also harms equality.  That is why Bill Gates is in favor of it.  Bill Gates has non-white only scholarships after he sponsored H-1b’s to keep down white wages.

Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, women’s the same as men’s were in 1963.  This is caused by immigration and in particular non-white immigration from the 3rd world.  America has been kept down as Japanese officials have tried to tell us from time to time, including their Justice Department.

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Immigration implies that the survival probability of every lineage here asymptotes to zero.  This is a form of equality, but not of liberty.  This loss of non-zero equality and liberty is what is offered by liberalism.  Its just race replacement as the math shows.  It erases successful searches, ie the evolution of genes and culture.  Whites have traveled a unique road of human evolution.

The common law, Bill of Rights, altruism, etc. are the virtues of white civilization.  But immigration erases them.

==Generalized Genocide quote from Wiki (they don’t use that term but we define the following as generalized genocide)

Lemkin’s broader concerns over genocide, as set out in his “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe”, [5] also embraced what may be considered as non-physical, namely, psychological acts of genocide which he personally defined as:

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”


White minority at HarvardWhite minority at Harvard

(Note White minority at Harvard is not in the original but was entered as alternative to image in the form for inserting an image.)

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.


Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5.  The 20 percent Jewish at Stanford is not in the following list but is a reasonable estimate.  The result is the same whatever number within reason is used as a plug.

Whites at Berkeley are 31 percent.  That includes Jews.  Take out 20 percent and you are down to 11 percent like Stanford.  This is a university founded and made great by non Jewish whites from nothing.

70% have at least one parent born outside the U.S. (2008)

Living alumni: 431,500 (August 2009)


Counts for the Fall 2003 entering class shown in the graph above:

Total 24,636

African American / Black 841 3%
American Indian / Alaskan Native 126 1%
Asian / Pacific Islander 10,272 42%

Hispanic 2,839 12%

White 7,755 31% •

Race/Ethnicity Unknown 2,017 8%

Total Citizens and Immigrants 23,850 97%

International 786 3%


Ethnic minorities constitute over one half of the undergraduate student population. As of Fall 2006, the UCLA undergraduate student body, excluding transfer students, was 44% Asian American, 31% White, 13% Chicano/Latino, 2% African American, less than 1% Native American, 3% International, and 7% Other/Unknown.


The Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews is eliminating whites from the universities whites founded.  Note the 31 percent number for whites.  It was 31.5 percent white at Stanford and 31 percent white at Berkeley.  That is before subtracting out Jews.  Once that is done one is down to under 20 percent whites, likely 10 percent whites.  Harvard was 48 percent white gross minus 31 percent Jewish for 17 percent white net.

The Slicer Coalition is blacks and Hispanics taking off the bottom and Jews and Asians off the top.  Jews are left in control by verbal dominance and their networking skills and group cohesion.  They bully the others and thus control the coalition.  Thus Jews have replaced whites at the elite schools in terms of control.  They erase the national pattern of whites and replace it with that of their own.  The removal of the cross in the Mojave desert, now on the way out of California for whites, symbolizes this complete erasing of the national pattern of whites.

This is why we have the right to separation from blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews. They are erasing our national pattern. That is generalized genocide.  That is followed by imposing their pattern.  That is followed by their replacing our genes by their own coalition.  That is guaranteed by new immigration according to the Wright Island Model and the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.

Discussion in above paragraphs is taken from:


Jeffrey Imm partly debates his critics at Hunter Wallace’s Occidental Dissent.

Also see this discussion:

In the above post I link to the former Chief of Counter-intelligence of the US, Joel Brenner who said Russia had cold war levels of activity in the U.S. But the FBI has not brought any cases.  Why is the FBI so concerned with White Nationalists?   China too is taking our secrets and is actually conducting cyber war against the US military and government as well as private entities.  Yet the FBI has to go to a college because of something scrawled in a bathroom.  Eric Holder is Attorney General and he said to the DOJ and implicitly the FBI that they were cowards on telling the truth about race.  That was in Black History Month 2009.   Well, we are speaking up.  Nation of Cowards is a whole blog devoted to that.

%d bloggers like this: