Archive for the 'Peter Brimelow' Category

Rev Ted Pike and Peter Brimelow still chance to stop hate crimes bill

October 18, 2009

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/10/18/hate-crime-bill-dirty-deal-still-not-done/

18 October 2009
“Hate Crime” Bill: Dirty Deal Still Not Done
[Peter Brimelow] @ 4:25 pm

http://www.truthtellers.org/hatecrimes.html

Rev Ted Pike and Peter Brimelow tell us there is still a chance to stop hate crimes bill.  This is saving free speech and our way of life.  The hate crimes bill is part of generalized genocide.  (Following has theory and then many links to related articles in series on generalized genocide and that it causes narrow genocide which is illegal and thus generalized genocide is too.)

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/

Jim Webb, why did you fight in Vietnam?  To take our freedom here at home?  Is cowardice before hate crimes bills the New Webb?   Senator Mark Warner, are you just a pale shadow of John Warner?  Do both of you have no respect for Thomas Jefferson?  Or George Washington?  Or James Madison the Father of the Bill of Rights?  Madison’s wife saved the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (at least in legend if not in fact).   Too bad you two can’t even try (neither in fact nor in legend).  Apparently, you can’t even think about it.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/senators-mark-warner-and-jim-webb-vote-against-s-909-hate-crimes/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/senators-mark-warner-and-jim-webb-vote-against-whites-on-hate-crimes/

Also read Patrick Cleburne at Vdare earlier on stopping hate crimes.  This set of columns by Cleburne is the way to learn the history of the fight on the bill.   These columns have many links to articles and to blogs of those fighting the bill including Rev Ted Pike.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/04/hate-crime-laws-a-zero-sum-game/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/11/holocaust-museum-shooting-quick-lets-suppress-free-speech/

Should one shooting end the first amendment and our freedom in general?  Not to mention the right to life free from immigration’s substitution effect that results in genetic extinction.  When a random event ends our freedom it shows they intended it in advance.  Remember the Patriot Act?  That should be a phrase like Remember Pearl Harbor or Remember the Maine.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/16/top-obama-gay-hate-crime-bill-to-pass-this-weekmaybe/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/18/immigration-scepticism-to-be-a-hate-crime/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/19/is-the-hate-bill-faltering/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/19/some-hate-killings-more-equal-than-others/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/21/hate-bill-problemwhite-men-can-count/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/26/a-g-holder-no-hate-crime-protection-for-white-christians-or-servicemen/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/27/hate-crime-bill-its-the-privilege-stupid/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/01/featured-holders-chilling-blunders-on-hate-crime-bill/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/02/hate-crime-bill-some-did-not-flinch/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/07/coming-from-california-a-crack-down-on-free-speech/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/10/hate-crimes-bill-update/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/13/this-week-ground-zero-for-hate-crimes-bill/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/15/hate-crime-privilege-grab-dangerously-close/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/16/hate-crimes-bill-the-christians-strike-back/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/16/hate-bill-cloture-vote-early-friday-sunset-on-liberty/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/17/hate-crimes-bill-a-reckoning/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/17/hate-crimes-bill-gays-adl-more-powerful-than-christians/

Cleburne on 2 British bloggers prosecuted for hate speech:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/12/for-who-the-bell-tolls/

Was part of the motivation for hate crimes here, the victory by BNP in the mother country?

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/06/07/bnp-breaks-though-in-european-parliament-elections/

Obama gave Hillary and McCain the finger and called Sarah Palin a pig.  Obama was elected on a platform of hate of whites which he showed openly.  Obama earned the name, President Hate.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/obama-gives-whites-finger-metaphorically/

You can drag it to second 48 and see him put his hand over his forehead when he implies Sarah Palin is a pig.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utHZ7zYytLk

Obama giving McCain the finger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnEhmbKazdw

Obama giving Hillary the finger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM

Obama smiles broadly when white comes up during the hate “prayer” against whites at Obama’s  Sinaugural.  He doesn’t grimace as if he didn’t know it was coming. He just lessens his smile near the end.  Moreover, he smiles broadly when its over.  You can see it below.

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/20/inaugural-benediction-pray-that-white-will-embrace-what-is-right/

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/20/about-that-race-based-benediction/

It was Obama’s plan.  This was deliberate.  Obama gave The White People the finger at his inauguration.  That inaugurated him as President Hate.  President Hate of the White Race.

Advertisements

Vdare blog answers Kennedy eulogies

August 30, 2009

The outstanding writers at the Vdare blog that Peter Brimelow has put together spent Saturday answering the false and harmful eulogies of Teddy Kennedy pouring out from TV.  This continues their excellent work from the week.  The first step to being a good writer is being a clear thinker.  Vdare is on the right side of logic so that is the first step.

Its writers have done an outstanding job pointing out the truth about Kennedy over the years and in this last week.  If anyone is thinking about where to contribute money, its to this team that Peter Brimelow has put together.   This is the hottest team of writers writing anywhere.

While the elite world wept for Kennedy (and Free Republic pulled a thread last week for being too anti-Kennedy) Vdare pointed out the following:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/28/ted-kennedy%E2%80%99s-legacy-symbolism-vs-stark-realities/

[Kevin Lamb] @ 12:07 pm

Historian Douglas Brinkley summarized Kennedy’s legacy as if his political contributions ranked with the Founding Fathers.

The parade of odious court historians who bray out a twisted version of history was on display yesterday and the day before.   Vdare was on the scene to point some of them out. However, this is a work for many to follow their lead and join in.  If you have any memories of this or notice transcripts of it in the days to come be sure to post them on your blog if you have one, here in the comments, or some place.  This is valuable work.

The plagiarist Doris Kearns Goodwin whose career is praising the greatest harm of our most harmful presidents was in full queen bee mode.  She was an assistant to LBJ in the White House.  Not content with her contribution to harming the nation then she went on to try to finish it off with her praise of the poison.   LBJ, FDR and Lincoln and his cabinet she has praised.  This is the trio that destroyed Founding Stock America.

http://www.doriskearnsgoodwin.com/team-of-rivals.php

Obama modeled himself on Lincoln in choosing such cabinet or near cabinet luminaries as Larry Summers, Eric Holder, and Timothy Geithner.  This trio is charged by Obama with finishing off Founding Stock America.   Bailing out Wall Street is an example.  They have done nothing to deal with the risk of large financial institutions as even Stanley Fischer pointed out at a recent meeting of the in crowd.  Obama has said he read Despicable Doris’s tome while choosing his team of the Devil’s Disciples.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/

==

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/kennedycare/

Steve Sailer points out that Kennedycare will remind people to think KopechneCare.  Kopechne was the first person to get Kennedycare, which consisted of a Kennedy Death Panel of one.  She died not from drowing but from slow suffocation.  You can still see ytedk.com website in the archive.  (Make copies if you want one.)

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.ytedk.com

Kennedy left her to die while he went back to his hotel, had a hot shower and a drink and then called friends saing the Protestant bigots will make a big deal of this.

Sailer elaborates on this and points out Kennedy was found with a dead girl in his car and his career lived on just fine.  There are different rules for the genociders and those who are genocided.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/tenure/

==

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/obama-kennedy-voice-of-poor-and-powerless-vdarecom-of-which-nationality/

[Patrick Cleburne] @ 3:30 pm

With deadly wit, Patrick Cleburne takes apart the nonsense that Kennedy was for the poor.

Obama lauds Kennedy as voice of poor and powerless
Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:44pm

The VDARE.com response of course is “poor and powerless of which nationality”? Kennedy’s sponsorship of, and unrepentant attempts to expand the 1965 Immigration Act disaster has been an unmitigated catastrophe for the American Working class – particularly Blacks – in terms of income and quality of life. It has to some extent benefited Plutocrats like Kennedy and the upper class generally.

This is an extremely important point and builds on discussion previously this week here and at Vdare back and forth on income inequality graphs being U shaped in the 20th century.

Those posts started with two on Novak and then the Kennedy articles have built on those.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/nation-of-immigrants-robert-novak-called-us-xenophobic-demagogues/e

(Krugman graph on income inequality discussed here:)

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/20/robert-novak-old-atlantic-lighthouse-votes-no/

Link to Krugman graph:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/even-more-gilded/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/ted-kennedy-legacy-median-wages-same-1973/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/ted-kennedy-destroyed-the-greatest-country-that-ever-was-old-atlantic-lighthouse/

Also see Cleburne’s post here pointing out Kennedy’s harm to the working class:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/senator-edward-kennedy-a-disaster-for-his-country/

==

To supplement that discussion, the following references are taken from an earlier post on Joe Guzzardi pointing out how the press has hollowed out itself by its support of immigration.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/press-watches-people-not-the-powerful/

Berkeley prof Saez’s paper with more graphs of the share of top 1 percent, top 10 percent over the period from before 1924 immigration restriction to today:

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2007.pdf

“Top Incomes in the Long Run of History” with Tony Atkinson and Thomas Piketty, April 2009, forthcoming in A.B. Atkinson and T. Piketty eds., Oxford University Press, 2010 (Tables and Figures in Excel format)

See Fig 13.8 of Excel sheet.  The U shaped countries from 1900 to 2004.  These are the UK, US, CA, AUS, NZ, IN, ARG, SE, NO.   We can see why immigration is popular with the elites in Europe.

Look at Table 13A.19.  The top .1 percent in Norway is in column F.  The top .1 percent went from being around 1 percent of national income in the 1970’s to being as much as 8.41 percent in 2005 as well as other high numbers.  These fluctuate with the stock market.  The very top have gotten a huge share of national income by immigration keeping wages down. These are the people who own the newspapers and TV stations.  They own Hollywood studios

==

Patrick Cleburne gives Kennedy his epitaph

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/senator-edward-kennedy-a-disaster-for-his-country/

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

These words should be his epitaph.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Because of affirmative action, the alleles are not neutral, but non-white ones are favored.  That just makes it happen faster.  In fact, each gene here individually has a world line that goes extinct under immigration as proven here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

Peter Brimelow has assembled a brilliant team of Vdare Veterans to stand against the Feckless Fabulists who are legion in the main stream media.  Their names and faces familiar to us.  Academics who once knew the truth and have grown so accustomed to lies they can hardly notice. They are accustomed to their lies not being pointed out which leads them to tell even bigger whoppers.

Krugman posting the income inequality graph that is U shaped is an example.  The daily liars we are exposed to take a toll on us we don’t realize.  Putnam should do a study of that.  It took courage for Peter Brimelow as an editor to turn his group loose on Kennedy’s funeral day.

Most of the rest of the right was silent.  But it was the proper thing to do.  The MSM had their teams of corporate liars spewing out false statements.  Its always the right thing to do to meet lies with truth and to do so instantly.

No family feelings entitle the MSM to get away with lies, which is exactly what the MSM expected.  Its what the speakers expected.  They were put out on national TV for the nation to come to a halt and listen to them.  They plugged health care and uncivil rights and immigration.  Kennedy himself said it in his remarks prepared for his funeral.  Brimelow had the courage to see through the establishment ploy and not hold back like certain other sites like National (morbid) Review.

==1126 AM

Patrick Cleburne extends the great Vdare coverage of Kennedy Week with this article on the Brazilianization of Martha’s Vineyard.  Americans can’t get jobs where Democrats rule.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/30/democratic-elite-prefers-marthas-vineyardbrazilian/

North East…Brazil?

Cleburne’s trademark incisive wit on display.

(Lou Dobbs take notice.)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/23/obama-marthas-vineyard-chelsea-clinton

The Guardian asks why MV is Obama’s ideal retreat?  Because Americans can’t get jobs.  Cleburne links to FT in depth article on the history of immigration there.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/e737b6c6-87a1-11de-9280-00144feabdc0.html

Cleburne links to two Vdare classics worth reading:

http://vdare.com/guzzardi/cheap_labor.htm

http://vdare.com/pb/people.htm

Cleburne also documented that Obama got the hedge fund money

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/10/26/hedge-funds-support-obama-why/

Cleburne links to this informative article on the top hedge funds.

http://nymag.com/news/features/2007/hedgefunds/30342/

They wanted their bailout and illegals too.  They want the government to pay for their health care as well as legalize their employers crimes on a rolling ongoing basis.  There are many other jobs they don’t want Founding Stock Americans to do, like Attorney General or Supreme Court justice. Obama has complied.

New York Times Nativists are Restless Vdare

February 1, 2009

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/01/peter-brimelow-at-the-national-press-club/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/01/theyre-just-not-making-white-supremacists-like-they-used-to/

NYT attacks Peter Brimelow, Marcus Epstein, Vdare, Bay Buchanan, Tom Tancredo, Pat Buchanan, Republicans, white people, Founding Stock Americans, Southernors, Virginia Dare, Benjamin Franklin implicitly and everyone linked to them in any way.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/opinion/01sun1.html?_r=1

Americans want immigration solved, and they realize that mass deportations will not do that. When you add the unprecedented engagement of growing numbers of Latino voters in 2008, it becomes clear that the nativist path is the path to permanent political irrelevance. Unless you can find a way to get rid of all the Latinos.

What a very interesting point of view.  NYT is saying you can never stop Latino immigration, since there will always be illegals to be legalized or anchor babies even if stopped legal immigration.  Either Latinos take over completely and genocide all here, or the rest have to eject all the Latinos.  Wisdom of the New York Times.

NYT is saying its all Latinos out or its:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

NYT is saying literally its all Latino genes replace all others or the others eject all Latinos.  This is because some sort of Latino immigration continues forever if any Latinos remain is the NYT position.  By the theorem that implies genetic extinction of all other genes.  Not mixing, but complete replacement.  Theorem doesn’t say there is final state of mixture, but a final state of complete replacement.

Note NYT is saying that Latinos insist on genocide of all other genes by future Latino immigration.  NYT says other genes can only survive by ejecting all Latinos because Latinos insist on genocide and have a program of genocide.  NYT is saying Latinos won’t let others coexist with them in equilibrium but insist on perpetual immigration to genocide all other genes completely.  Moreover, NYT says its either fight this and remove them all or give in and submit to genocide.  Those are the only two choices according to NYT.  (NYT is in effect saying Latinos hate all non-Latinos and are determined to genocide them and if any Latinos are left they will continue to try it.)

A semi-spoof with data to reject NYT and more math and theory is

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/new-york-times-orders-wright-island-model-concealed/

New York Times orders Wright Island Model concealed

February 1, 2009

(Spoof) The New York Times ordered that the Wright Island Model be removed from textbooks and webpages worldwide.  The NYT wrote:

The Wright Island Model makes the white nativists restless.  Its too much for the poor dears to comprehend that their extinction is decreed by us, and that makes it good.  Peter Brimelow, Vdare, and Marcus Epstein received warnings from the Times that they must apologize 5 times a day for being white.   When it was pointed out that Vdare was a website, the Times said so?  We say it is, so it is.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/population-genetics-island-model-one-way-migration/

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

(Nagylaki got started in physics and wrote papers on quantum electrodynamics.  WIM though is much older.)

New York Times claims that this is too complicated.  We are journalists, we are told what to say.   What do we care what some theorem says.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/01/19/carlos-slim-to-buy-more-of-new-york-times/

Besides we don’t like the assumptions.

Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem

June 4th, 2007 Assume that

  1. Population is bounded from above
  2. The flow of immigrants is unbounded from above
  3. The survival probabilities of the genes of each immigrant are equal.

Then

For any given cohort of immigrants at time t, the survival probability of their genes at T > t, p(t,T) must go to zero as T goes to infinity.

In fact the assumptions can be weakened so that if some group with unbounded influx has a survival probability which mutiplied by some constant bounds the other groups then it and all the groups have zero survival probability.  Same applies for ex-post survival factor.

NYT:  You didn’t use measure theory in that proof did you?   If you didn’t, we don’t accept it.  Its not theoretical enough.  If you did, we don’t accept it either, its not practical.

(OK, obviously the spoof is going too far.  The NYT editorialists don’t know measure theory and that probably includes Paul Krugman as well.)

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/01/peter-brimelow-at-the-national-press-club/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/01/theyre-just-not-making-white-supremacists-like-they-used-to/

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/opinion/01sun1.html?_r=1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewall_Wright

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/01/theyre-just-not-making-white.html

BTW with the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem you can proof the second law of thermodynamics.   The proof is basically that the full Hamiltonian or time development operator causes the system to have an influx of probability of other states as seen relative to some simpler Hamiltonian.  Thus the entropy increases since the probability of every state relative to the simpler Hamiltonian goes to zero.

The WIM implies a substitution effect.  This carries over to all aspects of human society.  The WIM says whatever good you do, the bad rises even more to force extinction of every gene here and each year’s cohort of genes that come here.  Immigration forever means that this is a genetic graveyard.  Every gene that comes here goes extinct.

Another way of understanding it is as follows.  Suppose every gene now in the US gets a serial number that is distinct.  Each gene that crosses the border gets a new serial border.  When a gene is created from a single gene, it copies the same serial number plus the date.  When created from two genes it gets both serial numbers combined and the date.

The serial numbers as of any date eventually all disappear even embedded in other numbers.  All the serial numbers that arrive in a year disappear as well even embedded in other numbers.  This has to happen because otherwise there would be more serial numbers than the upper bound on population.

Thus all the good that happens has to be overmatched by bad to force humans to reproduce below replacement.   We are in the credit crisis and financial crisis that the WIM predicts will happen.  Uncertainty is a way to get humans to defer reproduction.  In some cases, that is permanent.  Young adults defer and then are old adults before they know it.  Marriages are unstable.   So they don’t have more kids they break up.

Then young adults think recursively.  The marriage won’t last, so don’t have kids.  So don’t get married.

With zero immigration, not zero net, but zero influx, young adults have job security.  All jobs have to go to them if there is zero influx, not zero net, but zero absolute.  This gives young adults the confidence and security to get married, have kids, stay married and have more kids.  This produces institutions that work and happy families.  Happy families make institutions work and when institutions work they make it possible to have happy families.  This is why influx must be zero, not just equal to outflux.

Graph of ferility 1800 to 1990:

http://www.elderweb.com/home/node/2919

Fertility fell except during immigration restriction from 1940 to 1957, when immigration reached 250,000 per year again.  That is why that amount is too high, it cuts off the security of young adults and interferes with marriage stability.

Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973

See graph page 19

http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf

Productivity per hour doubled over the period.

==

Series Id: PRS84006093
Duration: index, 1992 = 100
Measure: Output Per Hour
Sector: Business

Series Id,Year,Period,Value,
PRS84006093,1947,Annual,32.232
PRS84006093,1948,Annual,33.722
PRS84006093,1949,Annual,34.493
PRS84006093,1950,Annual,37.325
PRS84006093,1951,Annual,38.510
PRS84006093,1952,Annual,39.602
PRS84006093,1953,Annual,41.013
PRS84006093,1954,Annual,41.883
PRS84006093,1955,Annual,43.619
PRS84006093,1956,Annual,43.647
PRS84006093,1957,Annual,45.026
PRS84006093,1958,Annual,46.268
PRS84006093,1959,Annual,48.027
PRS84006093,1960,Annual,48.865
PRS84006093,1961,Annual,50.568
PRS84006093,1962,Annual,52.882
PRS84006093,1963,Annual,54.950
PRS84006093,1964,Annual,56.808
PRS84006093,1965,Annual,58.817
PRS84006093,1966,Annual,61.205
PRS84006093,1967,Annual,62.543
PRS84006093,1968,Annual,64.678
PRS84006093,1969,Annual,64.994
PRS84006093,1970,Annual,66.285
PRS84006093,1971,Annual,69.015
PRS84006093,1972,Annual,71.243
PRS84006093,1973,Annual,73.410
PRS84006093,1974,Annual,72.257
PRS84006093,1975,Annual,74.793
PRS84006093,1976,Annual,77.145
PRS84006093,1977,Annual,78.455
PRS84006093,1978,Annual,79.320
PRS84006093,1979,Annual,79.305
PRS84006093,1980,Annual,79.151
PRS84006093,1981,Annual,80.779
PRS84006093,1982,Annual,80.149
PRS84006093,1983,Annual,83.002
PRS84006093,1984,Annual,85.215
PRS84006093,1985,Annual,87.131
PRS84006093,1986,Annual,89.673
PRS84006093,1987,Annual,90.133
PRS84006093,1988,Annual,91.507
PRS84006093,1989,Annual,92.409
PRS84006093,1990,Annual,94.381
PRS84006093,1991,Annual,95.902
PRS84006093,1992,Annual,100.000
PRS84006093,1993,Annual,100.390
PRS84006093,1994,Annual,101.360
PRS84006093,1995,Annual,101.495
PRS84006093,1996,Annual,104.494
PRS84006093,1997,Annual,106.478
PRS84006093,1998,Annual,109.477
PRS84006093,1999,Annual,112.841
PRS84006093,2000,Annual,116.107
PRS84006093,2001,Annual,119.067
PRS84006093,2002,Annual,123.934
PRS84006093,2003,Annual,128.693
PRS84006093,2004,Annual,132.403
PRS84006093,2005,Annual,135.001
PRS84006093,2006,Annual,136.416
PRS84006093,2007,Annual,138.957

==

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/outside.jsp?survey=pr

Select business, output per hour, and index. Then click on Add to Your Selection.

Then click on Get Data. You can get formatting options later. I selected only annual data and csv data. I copied that into a text file and then recopied it into this.

Other productivity choices and sources

Labor productivity

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/home.htm

http://www.bls.gov/bls/productivity.htm

http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?pr

1948 to 2002

http://www.bls.gov/mfp/historicalsic.htm

http://www.bls.gov/mfp/

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod3.t01.htm

Table 1. Private business sector:Indexes of productivity & related measures, 1987-2006

“productivity index” bls

==

PRS84006093,1973,Annual,73.410

PRS84006093,2007,Annual,138.957

This is almost a doubling of this measure of output per labor. There are many at BLS.

==NYT.  Bottom line is bottom line.  And top line is top line.

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/01/carlos-slim-to-bailout-ny-times.html

Virginia Dare’s Birthday at Vdare

August 18, 2007

James Fulford at Vdare discusses Virginia Dare’s birthday and links to articles at Vdare on that topic and the founding of Vdare.com by Peter Brimelow. Virginia Dare was born August 18, 1587.
http://vdare.com/fulford/070817_fulford_file.htm

Peter Brimelow’s book, Alien Nation (available for download) was published in 1995.

Peter Brimelow, Lawrence Auster, Roy Beck, Dan Stein, and many others were fighting this fight in the 1990’s and even in the 1980’s in some cases.
Fairus was founded in 1979. Fairus publications are here. Center for Immigration Studies was founded in 1985.

Dan Stein Report, where can post comments.

Lawrence Auster published “The Path to National Suicide” in 1990 (download here). Auster works. VFR.

Wiki on Auster.

Numbers USA “Our lost future” graphic. Jordan Commission 1994 report. Other Jordan Commission info. Roy Beck Case Against Immigration 1996.

Vanishing American reviews the Virginia Dare story with links to articles on Virginia Dare including the Saturday Evening Post article in 1941 on the Virginia Dare Stones:

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/08/virginia-dare-lost-colony-and-us.html

Vanishing American does a great job in bringing forward the contribution of many blogs on stopping immigration completely, not simply vague reform.

DHS Immigration Statistics.

http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/

33 million illegals and counting:

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/08/prospects-for-west-part-ii.html

Fred Elbel at American Resistance

http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/illegal_alien_numbers.html

Steve Sailer in 2005 reported that the Mexican government at that time estimated 20.64 million Mexicans living in the US.

http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/050821_chavez.htm

A Vdare reader estimates 40 million illegals in the US.

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_081407.htm

Above Replacement level Immigrants and their descendants since 1970 number about 50 million according to Roy Beck at Numbers USA.

The cost of post 1965 immigrants and their descendants may be 3/4 to 1.5 trillion per year. This top down estimate is discussed here. That estimate is based on 41 million foreign born. That includes legal and illegal.

http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign.html

http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/acscensus.cfm

http://www.cis.org/topics/currentnumbers.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Dare

http://the-lost-colony.blogspot.com/

http://www.lost-colony.com/

==Vdare’s Fan Club

Southern Poverty Law Center aka Southern Poverty Love Center

vdare site:splcenter.org

“Keeping America White”

“At a meeting of ‘paleoconservatives,’ former Forbes editor Peter Brimelow and others sound the alarm on non-white immigration”
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=285

Note that its a mathematical theorem that sustained one way migration will cause extinction of all genes in America or Europe or Australia or Canada. Thus one way migration is genetic extinction of all whites, as well as anyone else in those regions, and with a lag, everyone who comes there. This is in SPLC’s way of thinking, “normal”, and objecting to it by those in these lands is “racist”. See the Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=286

Other SPLC Love targets

Taylor and the Pioneer Fund are attacked in the article on Peter Brimelow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Taylor

Taylor founded American Renaissance in 1990. Archive from 1990.

Pioneer Fund

http://www.pioneerfund.org/

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=105

“Into the Mainstream An array of right-wing foundations and think tanks support efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable”
By Chip Berlet

The Nativists
Around the country, an anti-immigration movement is spreading like wildfire. An array of activists is fanning the flames.
by Susy Buchanan and Tom Kim

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/population-genetics-island-model-one-way-migration/

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1213928

The island model with stochastically variable migration rate and immigrant gene frequency is investigated. It is supposed that the migration rate and the immigrant gene frequency are independent of each other in each generation, and each of them is independently and identically distributed in every generation. The treatment is confined to a single diallelic locus without mutation. If the diploid population is infinite, selection is absent and the immigrant gene frequency is fixed, then the gene frequency on the island converges to the immigrant frequency, and the logarithm of the absolute value of its deviation from it is asymptotically normally distributed.

Prof Nagylaki didn’t make the 2005 list of Nativists compiled by SPLC, but maybe he can make the 2007 list? SPLC can search Wright Island Model.

“Results 1100 of about 1,990,000 for wright island model.”

Look at that, almost 2 million nativists, or a smaller number who are beavering away. Nativists seem to congregate in biology departments.

SPLC should compile a list of bigoted theorems.

Stalin’s henchmen also opposed genetics and biology in the 1940’s. See “Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939-1956: Books: David Holloway by David Holloway.” for a discussion of some of the strange goings on in Soviet science.

See this discussion of Lysenko, a true hero of PC thinking under Comrade Stalin.

The Soviet leadership sought an indigenous theory to counter the “capitalistic” works of Mendel and Charles Darwin and to separate evolution from genetics.

After this interruption for great moments in Stalinism, we now return to SPLC.

genetic site:splcenter.org

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=361

Race and ‘Reason’
Academic ideas a pillar of racist thought
By Barry Mehler

Does SPLC think there is any genetic basis for intelligence in biological organisms at all? Does SPLC think humans have a genetic difference in intelligence with other species? Does SPLC think that if humans differ from other species, that within humans there is perfect uniformity in a genetic basis of intelligence? If humans are not uniform, does the variation correlate to race? Does SPLC say that such statistics are bigoted and therefore false? Does Lysenko live in Montgomery Alabama in that SPLC building which is maintained, in part, by donations based on plagiarism of Colorado Media Matters research?

search Darwin bigot

Darwin site:splcenter.org

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp?S=MI&m=5

No one dared challenge Lysenko until 1964 – 9 years after Stalin died – even when he claimed, between 1948 and 1953, that wheat plants can produce seeds of rye. But, as the Encyclopedia Britannica observes, “he and his followers, however, long retained their degrees, their titles, and their academic positions and remained free to support their aberrant trend in biology.”

http://globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=1228&print=true

Maybe SPLC should be called part of the “Lysenko Nation” and should be called Lysenko Nationalists. Example, the Lysenko Nationalists at SPLC have mounted another fund raising smear against Peter Brimelow.

creationism site:splcenter.org

SPLC attacks whites who are against evolution as creationist Christian cretins. SPLC attacks whites who are for evolution as white nationalist bigots. Which is it? They don’t care, as long as they pay for that nice building? They have one box for donations against whites for evolution and another box for donations against whites against evolution. Pecunia non olet, money has no smell.

The more things change, the more the Stalinist left stays the same.

Blood on the Border

With racist rhetoric heating up and the American economy on unsteady legs, more anti-immigrant violence looms

Anti-Immigration Groups

SPLC plagiarism? SPLC appears to have used Colorado Media Matters research on its own webpage without citation in its dispute with Lou Dobbs on immigration bringing disease to the US, in particular leprosy. CMM and SPLC both compete for the same donations from the left. SPLC has a big building and brings in more more money to itself than CMM.

== Plagiarism of CMM?

search leprosy colorado media matters

leprosy site: colorado.mediamatters.org

leprosy site:splcenter.org

leprosy colorado media matters site:splcenter.org

“Your search – leprosy colorado media matters site:splcenter.org – did not match any documents.”

SPLC never cited CMM, despite apparently using its work. A comparison of the CMM and SPLC articles on leprosy, Lou Dobbs, the Peter Boyles Show, etc. shows that CMM was beating this horse long before SPLC and that SPLC appears to have used some of the same info. CMM is also more honest in linking to data that teaches away from its point of view, in particular a graph that labeled the big bulge of leprosy cases from South Asian immigrants related to post Vietnam asylum. SPLC didn’t cite that link because it teaches that legal immigration is the alternative cause to the spike in leprosy in the US instead of illegal immigration.

SPLC holds itself out as a public interest donation supported law firm. That is an ethical claim to a standard of ethics above a broadcaster like CNN that is for-profit. CNN reporters don’t hold themselves out as experts on leprosy. They also have little time for each story, and have to make nightly deadlines. SPLC has no nightly deadlines. They can take as long as they like to work on one of their pieces. They represent themselves as spending all the time required for a story, not doing the best they can subject to tight news deadlines.

Following have additional points on 60 Minutes and SPLC mining CMM research on the web w/o citation on this story.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/leslie-stahl-60-minutes-lou-dobbs-7000-leprosy-cases-dispute/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/part-2-leslie-stahl-60-minutes-lou-dobbs-7000-leprosy-dispute/

Also a note on SPLC here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/tag/allison-kunhardt/

Editor’s note: Based on evidence compiled by the Intelligence Report, the Southern Poverty Law Center is adding VDARE to its list of hate sites on the Web.”

Based on blatant plagiarism, the post-Lysenko Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian intelligence and Moscow State University are adding SPLC to their list of establishment plagiarism sites on the web, including Harvard University? Please send inquiries, and greetings on his 70th birthday, to Academician Valery Makarov at the New Economic School, Moscow.

More on SPLC

Other early voices to stop immigration.

Buchanan Speech in 1992 at Republican National Convention

http://www.buchanan.org/pa-92-0817-rnc.html

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Patrick_Buchanan’s_Speech_to_1992_GOP_Convention

http://www.buchanan.org/blog/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tancredo

Tancredo opposed bilingual education in the 1970’s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Buchanan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Sailer

Internet rankings: (To be used, not believed.)

http://www.quantcast.com/fairus.org

http://www.quantcast.com/vdare.com

http://www.quantcast.com/blog.vdare.com

Lou Dobbs joined the fight in 2003?

http://www.quantcast.com/keyword:lou+dobbs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Dobbs

He also regained the helm of the newly renamed Lou Dobbs Moneyline (which became Lou Dobbs Tonight in June 2003).

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2867

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1162

In Jan 2004, Dobbs started to be the target of hate profiles.

Extra! January/February 2004

Dobbs’ Choice
CNN host picks immigration as his ax to grind

By Peter Hart

With all the attention paid to the near-overt partisanship of the Fox News Channel, it’s important to remember that skewed reporting wasn’t invented by Rupert Murdoch’s cable operation.

In the last few months of 2003, CNN‘s Lou Dobbs Tonight

The selection of topics, the slanted sourcing and the occasionally inaccurate or incomplete information conveyed on the program all seemed calculated to convince the viewer that the U.S. is in the midst of a crisis that is, according to Dobbs, “changing the very nature of this country” (9/30/03). The title of a series on immigration, “Broken Borders,” conveyed Dobbs’ political position; immigrants were also routinely featured on his show’s regular “Great American Giveaway” segment.

devoted abundant broadcast time to what anchor Dobbs described as an influx of “illegal aliens who not only threaten our economy and security, but also our health and well-being. Millions of aliens crossing our borders.”

http://www.american.com/archive/2006/november/lou-dobbs

In December 2003, the show was reaching an average of 463,000 households a night; by August 2006, it was reaching 646,000 families, according to Nielsen Media Research. Dobbs’s audience share is only one-tenth as large as the average nightly news show on ABC, NBC, and CBS, and less than two-thirds’ the size of the competing Fox News program at 6 p.m. eastern time, “Special Report with Brit Hume.” Still, Dobbs reaches nearly twice as many homes as Chris Matthews, and Dobbs—unlike Hume and Matthews—has an audience that’s powerfully growing.

Casual channel surfers aren’t the only ones tuning in. Members of Congress say that Dobbs’s acerbic positions on his latest fascination, illegal immigration, have become increasingly influential on Capitol Hill. “I’d have to give him pretty strong points for being one of the singular figures to drive this agenda item in Congress,” said a prominent free-trade Republican congressman. Meanwhile, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado), whose views on immigration are similar to those of Dobbs, says he regularly overhears his colleagues telling each other, “If you do this Dobbs will go after us, or if you do this it will play well on Dobbs.”

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060828/eviatar

http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2005/02/lou_dobbs.html

Since 2003, his CNN news show Lou Dobbs Tonight has featured a recurring segment in which Dobbs and his team report on corporations sending jobs overseas. He has compiled an online list of outsourcers

Ismail Ax and anti-Americanism?

April 19, 2007

Lawrence Auster asks: If the Koreans are our friends, why do they dislike us so much?

From the Chosun Ilbo:

Yu Bum-hee, Dept. of Neuropsychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, said, “Virginia has a reputation for having comparatively strong white supremacy movements. It’s possible that Cho felt diminished by that atmosphere.”

April 18, 2007

Virginia Tech Massacre: Gun Control—Or Immigration Control?
By Peter Brimelow

Re: President George Bush Renewing Efforts on Immigration

April 9, 2007

“President Renewing Efforts on Immigration Plan for Overhaul Faces Battle in Divided Congress”

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 9, 2007; Page A01

See comments by Patrick Cleburne at

Problem for Amnesty: Troops unwilling.

Follow up WaPo Article

Bush Pushes Immigration Plan, Guest Worker Program

By Michael A. Fletcher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 9, 2007; 3:36 PM
Comments at Follow Up article
==Comments original WaPo article posted at WaPo below

What follows is a mess. Its notes while posting comments at WaPo on the Bush immigration speech. In some cases, the links that were used to source quotes are included. But these are not formatted as live links at this point.
==

Men’s median wages peaked in 1973. See p60-231.pdf a publication of the census at census.gov. Search on p60-231.pdf is enough. Income inequality is U shaped in the 20th century. Search on “u shaped” income inequality Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez. Saez is a Berkeley prof. He has data to download from his website. They have an NBER paper. They find that the top 1 percent got 20 percent of national income before immigration restriction in the 1920’s, they got 10 percent after and then after the 1965 Immigration Act, legal immigration, it has gone back up to 20 percent. Search NEW DATA SHOW EXTRAORDINARY JUMP IN INCOME CONCENTRATION IN 2004
By Aviva Aron-Dine and Isaac Shapiro to see a graph of the percentage share of national income of the top 1 percent. The Bush family is in the top 1 percent. So are Kennedy and McCain. So is Sheikh Pelosi.

==

quote Mr. Luntz is 80 percent right. The richest 20 percent of American households—and only the richest 20 percent—have enjoyed higher real incomes during the Bush expansion. Everyone else has lost ground; the lowest 20 percent has actually lost a full 1.8 percent. (For details, click here: Table 1.) end quote September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality
at Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==Edwin S. Rubenstein quotation:

Until recently, economists rarely mentioned the I-word when explaining the income distribution. The consensus among most academics was that the primary cause of increased inequality was “skill-biased technical change” (SBTC)—i.e., increased economic rewards to educated, technically savvy workers.

In a word, SBTC compensation was based on merit. How quaint!

Northwestern University economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon broke from the group naiveté in a paper published last year:

“If SBTC had been a major source of the rise in inequality, then we should have observed an increase in relative wages of those most directly skilled in the development and use of computers. Yet in the 1989-97 period….total real compensation of CEOs increased by 100 percent, while those in occupations related to math and computer science increased only 4.8 percent and engineers decreased by 1.4 percent.” [Where did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, (PDF) Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon, Northwestern University]

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==quotation Edwin S. Rubenstein:

quote In debunking SBTC the authors make a broader historical point regarding immigration:

“To be convincing, a theory must fit the facts, and the basic facts to be explained about income equality are not one but two, that is, not only why inequality rose after the mid-1970s but why it declined from 1929 to the mid-1970s. Three events fit neatly into this U-shaped pattern, all of which influence the effective labor supply curve and the bargaining power of labor: (1) the rise and fall of unionization, (2) the decline and recovery of immigration, and (3) the decline and recovery in the importance of international trade and the share of imports…”

“Partly as a result of restrictive legislation in the 1920s, and also the Great Depression and World War II, the share of immigration per year in the total population declined from 1.3 percent in 1914 to 0.02 percent in 1933, remained very low until a gradual recovery began in the late 1960s, reaching 0.48 percent (legal and illegal) in 2002. Competition for unskilled labor not only arrives in the form of immigration but also in the form of imports, and the decline of the import share from the 1920s to the 1950s and its subsequent recovery is a basic fact of the national accounts.” end quote. September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==quotation Edwin S. Rubenstein:

quote But the foreign-born share of the labor force—15 percent in 2005—is also unprecedented. Since 2001 illegals have accounted for most of immigrant labor force growth.

Cheap immigrant labor induces only a nugatory increase in total native income. Its biggest impact, according to Harvard economist George Borjas, is to redistribute income from native workers to employers.

Recent data seem to confirm this. The construction industry is booming, home builders are racking up record profits, yet average construction wages have fallen between 15 percent and 35 percent across the country—the result of cheap immigrant labor.

Similarly, the service industries—restaurants, hotels, motels, cleaning companies, etc. – are major employers of immigrant labor. These industries are booming, creating wealth for executives and shareholders. But average real wages of service industry workers have declined since 2001. end quote April 06, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
The Smoking Bottom Line: Immigration Boosting Profits, Cutting Wages Vdare.com

==

http://www.vdare.com/walker/dui.htm

quote Traditionally, drinking to excess is valued in Mexican and Latin culture, where it is seen an expression of machismo. Moreover, MADD reports that Hispanics believe it takes 6-8 drinks to affect driving, while Americans think it takes 2-4 drinks.

In 2001, according to MADD, 44.1 percent of California’s drunk driving arrests in 2001 were of Hispanics, although Hispanics made up only 31.3 percent of the state’s population.

The general incidence of drunk driving has worsened in California—parallel with the skyrocketing Latino population. Accidents involving drunk drivers increased overall nearly 5 percent in the state in 2000, with an uptick in Los Angeles County of 7.6 percent in that year. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for Hispanics ages 1-44. end quote Brenda Walker Vdare.com

==

quote THE MIDDLE CLASS IS NOT BEING WIPED OUT, THIS ASSERTION IS NONSENSE, the unemployment rate is 5 percent and wages are rising. We are not going to deport 12 million people, without creating a police state that people woud never support.

By RealChoices | Apr 9, 2007 6:56:50 AM | end quote. Men’s median wages are lower than in 1973. See p60-231.pdf graph page 18 at census.gov. Just search on p60-231 in google.

==

L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.
by Brentin Mock Southern Poverty Love Center.

quote “The way I hear these knuckleheads tell it, they don’t want their neighborhoods infested with blacks, as if it’s an infestation,” says respected Los Angeles gang expert Tony Rafael, who interviewed several Latino street gang leaders for an upcoming book on the Mexican Mafia, the dominant Latino gang in Southern California. “It’s pure racial animosity that manifests itself in a policy of a major criminal organization.”

“There’s absolutely no motive absent the color of their skin,” adds former Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Michael Camacho. Before he became a judge, in 2003, Camacho successfully prosecuted a Latino gang member for the random shootings of three black men in Pomona, Calif. end quote

==
June 05, 2006
Time To Rethink Immigration (II): Freeing America From The Immigration Gulag

By Peter Brimelow
quote Moratorium on legal immigration. Not no gross immigration but no net immigration—which would permit an inflow of 200,000 a year or so, enough to take care of hardship cases, needed skills etc. Abandon the principle of “family reunification,” which in practice has meant uncontrollable chain migration. Immigrants should be admitted on own merits.

bullet Abolish “refugee” category. In practice, this is simply an expedited, subsidized immigration program for politically-favored groups. Anyway, humanitarian aid is best given in situ—for example, the “Somali Bantu” could have been resettled in Mozambique, not Maine. America is not the world’s Kleenex. end quote June 05, 2006
Time To Rethink Immigration (II): Freeing America From The Immigration Gulag

By Peter Brimelow Vdare.com

==

Immigration, legal, amnesty, refugee, means the end of social security, medicare, medicaid, functional schools, ERs, and health insurance at work. Men’s median wages were higher in 1973, see p60-231.pdf at census.gov, graph page 18. The reason they cut health benefits is the same reason, to cut our wages. Government can’t afford what we don’t make. We can’t have national health insurance for the 3rd world. We are losing our health coverage by legal immigration. We must have zero immigration to save our way of life.

==

Bush is disloyal to the American people.

..

Bush: America is an idea not people. The American
people can be discarded in the dustbin of history.

==

Bush what matters is the idea of freedom, not the people
who want to be free, they can be discarded as refuse.

Iraq was for freedom as an idea, Abu Ghraib was for the actual people. Bushism is Stalinism. Believe in Bush and you will be free in Stalin.

==

Bush’s Iraq promise was for freedom as an idea. Bush’s Abu Ghraib was for the actual people.

==

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

Brentin Mock continued
quote A comprehensive study of hate crimes in Los Angeles County released by the University of Hawaii in 2000 concluded that while the vast majority of hate crimes nationwide are not committed by members of organized groups, Los Angeles County is a different story. Researchers found that in areas with high concentrations, or “clusters,” of hate crimes, the perpetrators were typically members of Latino street gangs who were purposely targeting blacks.

Furthermore, the study found, “There is strong evidence of race-bias hate crimes among gangs in which the major motive is not the defense of territorial boundaries against other gangs, but hatred toward a group defined by racial identification, regardless of any gang-related territorial threat.”
Six years later, the racist terror campaign continues. end quote

SPLC L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.
by Brentin Mock

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

==

Don’t protect politicians who commit crimes. They are disloyal to us on immigration. Let Bush go to jail for torture. Let Kennedy go to jail for Chappaquiddick. These politicians have a long list of suspect transactions. If you have even a little information send it to groups that forward information on crime or Judicial Watch or blog it anonymously. You don’t have to be a hero and go into the FBI. Turn your information over to organizations that go after politicians. You don’t have to tell your boss. There are tipster organizations you can contact.

==

quote The question is asked, who will pick the fruits and vegetables, who will do the construction jobs, who will do the jobs in the service industry? Which in turn begs the question, who owns the farms, who is having the house built, who owns the hotel and the restraunt? And the answer is the rich, the upper 10 who exploit these illegals,who are just trying to have a better way of life. If these people were made to pay better wages then maybe a lot more people could have a better way of life

By johnleebowes | Apr 9, 2007 10:41:40 AM | end quote. Put employers of illegals in prison and they can pick the fruit on a chain gang. What about politicians who vote the way they get contributions. They will want to have a jury decide if they did right, won’t they? To clear their name?

==

Jack Abramoff can probably fill the farms with chain gang pols from his contribution rolodex. And he isn’t the only one. The K street gang documented by the Post can fill our farms with their labor.

==

quote Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos, were sentenced to 12 years and 11 years, respectively, in October by U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Cardone end quote WND. Members of Congress and Senators and lobbyists will want juries to determine if the contributions they gave for earmarks were bribery, won’t they? They will want to clear their name before their constituents? If border guards go to jail for dangerous work, shouldn’t Senators who take money from special interests face the people on a jury?

“u shaped” income inequality Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez
http://www.vdare.com/walker/dui.htm

May 04, 2004
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Drunk Driving

By Brenda Walker

==

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=181

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-harbor4mar04,0,5714315.story?coll=la-home-headlines

How a community imploded
L.A. long ignored Harbor Gateway. Now a Latino gang calls the shots.
By Sam Quinones, Times Staff Writer
March 4, 2007

==

Thomas Piketty

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/mccain-fighting-to-recapture-maverick-spirit-of-2000-bid/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR2007030300841.html

==

April 08, 2007

NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON’T want your name and/or email address published when sending VDARE email.

04/07/07 – A Jewish Immigration Dissident Advises David Orland Not To Hold His Breath
Today’s Letter: A Reader Experiences Censorship

Re: LAPD: “We Don’t Get Into” Immigration Status Of Christmas Story Director’s Killer By Nicholas Stix

From: An “Irate Reader”

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_040807.htm
==

“u shaped” site:vdare.com

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/

http://www.nber.org/papers/W8467

http://www.cbpp.org/7-10-06inc.htm

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060406_nd.htm

http://www.vdare.com/pb/060605_gulag.htm

http://www.vdare.com/bulletins/031907_bulletin.htm

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/03/04/mexican-gangs-ethnic-cleansing-of-black-amercans-in-los-angeles/

Duane Chapman bounty hunter mexico

http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/dog-bounty-hunter-star-duane-chapman-arrested-for-capture-1009823.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Chapman

==

m.jagger | Apr 9, 2007 11:38:04 AM is right. Also, as others pointed out, illegals here and those who would come here can make their own countries better rather than keeping us from having children by taking away job security for young adults. Think of all the children not born to Americans since Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act because men’s median wages stopped going up in 1973. quote ==

“Numbers Drop for the Married With Children
Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent”

By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03

PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.

As marriage with children becomes an exception rather than the norm, social scientists say it is also becoming the self-selected province of the college-educated and the affluent.

“The culture is shifting, and marriage has almost become a luxury item, one that only the well educated and well paid are interested in,” said Isabel V. Sawhill, an expert on marriage and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Many demographers peg the rise of a class-based marriage gap to the erosion since 1970 of the broad-based economic prosperity that followed World War II. end quote

The 1965 Immigration Act caused this. Men’s median wages are down from 1973. Search p60-229.pdf and go to page 14 on census.gov. 51 percent of women live alone. This is because men don’t make enough.Female fertility is then below replacement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=201

==

quote *Mens median wages peaked in 1973. See p60-231.pdf a publication of the census at census.gov. Search on p60-231.pdf is enough.* What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. end quote quote Until recently, economists rarely mentioned the I-word when explaining the income distribution. The consensus among most academics was that the primary cause of increased inequality was “skill-biased technical change” (SBTC)—i.e., increased economic rewards to educated, technically savvy workers.

In a word, SBTC compensation was based on merit. How quaint!

Northwestern University economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon broke from the group naiveté in a paper published last year:

“If SBTC had been a major source of the rise in inequality, then we should have observed an increase in relative wages of those most directly skilled in the development and use of computers. Yet in the 1989-97 period….total real compensation of CEOs increased by 100 percent, while those in occupations related to math and computer science increased only 4.8 percent and engineers decreased by 1.4 percent.” [Where did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, (PDF) Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon, Northwestern University] end quote September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality

==

Second post has a different quotation from Vdare on U shaped timing show that share of top 1 percent, the Bush Pelosi McCain Kennedy group, went from 20 percent before 1920’s restriction to 10 percent during restriction back to 20 percent with legal immigration. This shows its legal and illegal immigration that is the cause of men’s median wages being below 1973. Sorry if 2nd post above looks like the same post over again, but the reply is different. Also thanks to Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 12:14:00 PM | for his research and insights in replying to this, that the rise in women’s wages is simply creating men and women living apart with no kids or a single parent with kids. In fact, the Post has reported on that several times. 51 percent of women live without a spouse. Married with kids is the privilege of the affluent according to Post reporting. quote “Numbers Drop for the Married With Children
Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent”

By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03

PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.

As marriage with children becomes an exception rather than the norm, social scientists say it is also becoming the self-selected province of the college-educated and the affluent.

“The culture is shifting, and marriage has almost become a luxury item, one that only the well educated and well paid are interested in,” said Isabel V. Sawhill, an expert on marriage and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Many demographers peg the rise of a class-based marriage gap to the erosion since 1970 of the broad-based economic prosperity that followed World War II. end quote

The 1965 Immigration Act caused this. Men’s median wages are down from 1973. Search p60-229.pdf and go to page 14 on census.gov. 51 percent of women live alone. This is because men don’t make enough.Female fertility is then below replacement.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/03/04/mexican-gangs-ethnic-cleansing-of-black-amercans-in-los-angeles/

Hispanic ethnic cleansing blacks site:Vdare.com

ethnic cleansing blacks site:Vdare.com

u shaped site:vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070318_diversity.htm

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/01/25/

http://wordpress.com/tag/income-inequality-graph/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/mccain-fighting-to-recapture-maverick-spirit-of-2000-bid/

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==

quote Economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert Gordon have compared wage and salary growth within the richest ten percent of American earners with that of the median wage earner. [Ian Dew-Becker, Robert J. Gordon, Where Did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2:2005. PDF]

Here are their results, adjusted for inflation, for the years 1966 to 2001:
bullet Median wage and salary: +11 percent
bullet 90th percentile: +58 percent
bullet 99th percentile: +121 percent
bullet 99.9th percentile: +236 percent end quote
January 29, 2007
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
Yes, Tyler, Income Inequality Is Real. And Immigration Is A Cause. Vdare.com

==

quote July 28, 2003
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
Hispanic Family Values?
Illegitimacy rates: unmarried Hispanic women aged 15-44 are about one-third again as likely to have a child as unmarried black women in that age bracket – 93.4 per 1,000 vs. 71.5 – and more than three times as an unmarried white women (27.9 per 1,000). [Source: Centers For Disease Control, pdf file]

bullet Abortion: Hispanic women are two and a half times more likely to have abortions than white women (33 per 1,000 annually vs. 13) and nearly-two thirds as likely as black women (49). [Source: Guttmacher Institute]

bullet Teenage pregnancy: Hispanics are high (about 94 per 1,000 vs. 32 for whites) and relatively worsening – they’ve now surpassed blacks (83 per 1,000). [Source: Centers For Disease Control, pdf file]

bullet Dependency: Nearly one-third (30.6%) of Hispanics receive means-tested benefits, compared to less than a tenth (9.2%) of non-Hispanic whites and just over a third (35.0%) of blacks. [Source: U.S. Census, pdf file]

bullet Criminality: just over one in every hundred adult male Hispanics (1.2%) was imprisoned in 2001 – almost a third of the non-Hispanic black rate (3.5%) and well over twice the non-Hispanic white rate (0.5%). [Source: Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 2001, pdf file]

bullet Risky behavior: The Hispanic death rate from HIV disease is 2.5-times that of whites (7 per 100,000 vs. 2.8), and about one-third of the black rate (24). [National Center For Health Statistics, pdf file]

end quote
==

quote Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall
Deadbeat Dads Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande

“Family Values Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande.”

That’s a slogan George W. Bush uses to justify illegal immigration.
Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall
Deadbeat Dads Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande

“Family Values Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande.”
The problem of emigrants abandoning their families is so bad that some of these poor Mexican women have actually written to VDARE.COM for help! One of them told us (my translation) that

“…my husband is an illegal alien, and has been for approximately a year and a half. I haven’t seen him for 3 years and I would like him sent back to Mexico, where he was born… I am a desperate woman with 4 children and I can’t provide for them, we live in poverty…Help me…”

This desperate lady wants the U.S. to deport her husband, and she actually included the guy’s address in California.

That’s a slogan George W. Bush uses to justify illegal immigration.
One of the towns in Susuapan is Tremecino:

“In Tremecino 25% of the mothers are left alone with their children, expecting a husband who may return this year, in 2 years or more, if at all.”

By the way, in Tremecino, the average age of marriage or cohabitation is 14!

One of the inhabitants of Tremecino is Rosa:

“…She had 4 children when her husband emigrated to Tucson. She was expecting him to send her money but it never arrived, because the man became an alcoholic and found another woman.”

==

quote It’s not widely understood, but the 1986 federal amnesty for illegal immigrants set off a baby boom among unskilled Hispanics in California that began in 1988 and lasted into the late 1990s, with consequences for gang activity that have just recently become palpable.

Demographers Laura E. Hill and Hans P. Johnson of the Public Policy Institute of California wrote in 2002:

“Between 1987 and 1991, total fertility rates for foreign-born Hispanics [in California] increased from 3.2 to 4.4 [expected babies per woman over her lifetime]. … Why did total fertility rates increase so dramatically for Hispanic immigrants? First, the composition of the Hispanic immigrant population in California changed as a result of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986. In California alone, 1.6 million unauthorized immigrants applied for amnesty (legal immigrant status) under this act. The vast majority were young men, and many were agricultural workers who settled permanently in the United States. Previous research indicates that many of those granted amnesty were joined later by spouses and relatives in the United States… As a result, many young adult Hispanic women came to California during the late 1980s. (“Understanding the Future of Californians’ Fertility: The Role of Immigrants”).

This ex-illegal immigrant baby boom created an indigestible population pig-in-a-python that overwhelmed California’s public schools in the 1990s, with many having to shift to disruptive year round schedules. The LA Unified School District alone has budgeted $19 billion for construction to accommodate the immigration-driven growth in student numbers. end quote March 18, 2007
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Gang Warfare

By Steve Sailer Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070318_diversity.htm

==

Search construction industry wages site:vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060406_nd.htm

quote The last few years should have been good ones for labor. Since February 2004 more than 4 million jobs have been created. Output per worker increased by 3.5 percent in 2004 and 2.7 percent last year. Yet the balance of power continued shifting from labor to capital. Not only did profits spike as a share of GDP, but real median income actually declined in 2003 and 2004 (the latest available year.) end quote quote Recent data seem to confirm this. The construction industry is booming, home builders are racking up record profits, yet average construction wages have fallen between 15 percent and 35 percent across the country—the result of cheap immigrant labor. end quote April 06, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
The Smoking Bottom Line: Immigration Boosting Profits, Cutting Wages Vdare.com

==

quote Americans also know that there are resulting consequences for such massive uncontrolled illegal immigration. One result will be a population explosion! Do the math– it’s breathtaking! If all 20 to 23 million illegal aliens here today are given guest worker amnesty along with “family reunification,” it will add roughly 60 million people to the current legal population of 293 million.(12) In 2050, just forty-four years from now, demographers say there will be half a billion people residing in America!(13) Just imagine what kind of impact that will have on our natural resources and quality of life! end quote Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
March 16, 2006 Anarchy Reigns ~ Enforce the Laws ~ Stop The Invasion

==

quote Today, California’s amnesty baby boom generation is between ages 10 and 19, entering their prime gang violence years. … California is now exporting its illegal immigration problem—gang wars, overcrowded schools, declining standards of living, and the like—to the other 49 states. end quote March 18, 2007
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Gang Warfare

By Steve Sailer

==

quote L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.

According to gang experts and law enforcement agents, a longstanding race war between the Mexican Mafia and the Black Guerilla family, a rival African-American prison gang, has generated such intense racial hatred among Mexican Mafia leaders, or shot callers, that they have issued a “green light” on all blacks. A sort of gang-life fatwah, this amounts to a standing authorization for Latino gang members to prove their mettle by terrorizing or even murdering any blacks sighted in a neighborhood claimed by a gang loyal to the Mexican Mafia.

“This attitude is pretty pervasive throughout all the [Latino] gangs,” says Tim Brown, a Los Angeles County probation supervisor. “As long as [street] gangs are heavily influenced by the prison gangs, particularly the Mexican Mafia, racism is just part and parcel of why they come into being and why they continue to exist.” But with the Mexican Mafia’s shadow looming over Los Angeles, it may be a long time before the rapidly growing number of streets claimed by Latino gangs are safe for blacks, if ever.
“It’s not just Highland Park. It’s almost anywhere in L.A. that you could find yourself in a difficult position [as a black person],” says Lewis, the LAPD probation officer. “All blacks are on green light no matter where.”
by Brentin Mock end quote SPLC

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=281

==

7 of the top 8 wealthiest Senators voted for S. 2611, amnesty, affirmative action, non-deportable crime, and a pathway for the top 1 percent of households to continue to enjoy 20 percent of each year’s income, compared to 10 percent before Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. The only 1 of the top 8 who didn’t vote for S. 2611 didn’t vote, Jay Rockefeller. McCain is 7th and Kennedy 8th in wealth.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.asp?type=W&cycle=2005&filter=S

Rank Name Minimum Net Worth Maximum Net Worth

1 Herb Kohl (D-Wis) $219,098,029 to $234,549,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

2 John Kerry (D-Mass) $165,741,511 to $235,262,100

Voted Yes S. 2611

3 Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa) $78,150,023 to $101,579,003 Not Voting S. 2611

4 Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) $43,343,464 to $98,660,021 Voted Yes S. 2611

5 Lincoln D. Chafee (R-RI) $41,153,105 to $64,096,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

6 Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) $38,198,170 to $90,733,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

7 John McCain (R-Ariz) $25,071,142 to $38,043,014

Voted Yes S. 2611

8 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $19,189,049 to $93,043,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

S 2611 Roll Call Senators understand: immigration goes up, wages go down. Wages go down Senators’ stocks go up. Men’s median wages are lower than
in 1973, Senators’ stocks go up. Top 1 percent get 20 percent of national income today and 10 percent in 1965, Senators’ stocks go up. Bush family and Pelosi family are also in the top 1 percent.

==

quote Poll: Most Americans Don’t Want Continuing
Large U.S. Population Growth

As Nation Hits 300 Million Milestone, Voters Prefer
Reduced Immigration Over Adding Another 100 Million

Commentary by Roy Beck * endquote NumbersUSA Posted on another thread by
blowe1 | Apr 9, 2007 2:43:58 PM

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/04/sweet_blog_special_bush_return.html

8th amnesty?

==

quote What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. by RealChoices from Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 4:39:28 PM above. In addition to Pacthed’s arguments above and earlier in response to this point by RealChoices it should be pointed out that women’s wages are still below men’s. But men’s are below what they were in 1973. So women’s wages now are still less than men’s wages in 1973. That is the argument of Bush, McCain and Kennedy for immigration, that its kept wages for women below what men’s wages were in 1973. How many women have thought that was society’s goal? I haven’t heard many women saying they wanted women’s wages to stay below men’s wages in 1973 for their entire working life from 1973 to now. Search p60-231.pdf in google and go to page 18 for the graph. It has men’s and women’s wages. Is the future for women that Kennedy promises them is that their wages will stay below the wages of men in 1973?

==

quote What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. by RealChoices from Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 4:39:28 PM above. In addition to Pacthed’s arguments above and earlier in response to this point by RealChoices it should be pointed out that women’s wages are still below men’s. But men’s are below what they were in 1973. So women’s wages now are still less than men’s wages in 1973. That is the argument of Bush, McCain and Kennedy for immigration, that its kept wages for women below what men’s wages were in 1973. How many women have thought that was society’s goal? I haven’t heard many women saying they wanted women’s wages to stay below men’s wages in 1973 for their entire working life from 1973 to now. Search p60-231.pdf in google and go to page 18 for the graph. It has men’s and women’s wages. Is the future for women that Kennedy promises them is that their wages will stay below the wages of men in 1973? The ratio of women’s wages to men’s went from 60 percent in 1959 to about 77 percent in 2005. This is what women were hoping for? That 77 percent is 77 percent of men’s wages in 2005, but men’s wages in 2005 were lower than men’s wages in 1973. So women are getting less than 77 percent of what men’s wages were in 1973. Is that what women have been working for? Is that the future they want? A women who started working in 1965, the year of Kennedy’s immigration act and who worked to this year would have worked 42 years, all of them at less than 77 percent of what men made in 1973. Was that the goal? Do they thank Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act and its legal immigration for that lifetime of underpay?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=321

=

Another way to think of this. Suppose men made 100 in 1973 and women made 60 percent, or 60. Women go to 77 percent or 77, an improvement of 17. But if men’s wages had gone to 150 say and women’s percent stayed at 60, they would make 90 instead of 77. Moreover, if they had gone to 90 percent they would make 135 instead of 77, almost twice as much. Immigration did 2 things to women. It kept men’s wages down, and thus since women get a percentage less than 100 of men’s that means it kept theirs down. Second, the percentage of women’s pay to men’s pay was kept down by immigration. So women lost out twice from immigration, a lower percentage of men’s pay than they would have got, and their base in effect, men’s pay, didn’t move up. Even at 100 percent, women would only make what men did in 1973, since men only make that much.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=341

==

Women are often treated harshly by employers. Look at Mary Jo Kopechne who was left by Kennedy to die in an air pocket while he went back to his hotel and had a drink while she suffocated. See ytedk.com. Women are treated too harshly by employers for them to have a ceiling of men’s pay which doesn’t move since 1973. Women work too hard and are treated too harshly for their percentage of men’s pay to be kept at 77 percent by immigration instead of being close to 100 percent where it would have been after 40 years of women’s lib without the legal and illegal immigration influx. Women got the short end from Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration act 2 ways, men’s pay was frozen at the 1973 level and women’s percentage didn’t go to 100 percent, which it would have done without a market influx of low cost labor. Because health insurance benefits are cut back, women lose out a third time from immigration which has not just cut pay but also benefits including health insurance. Even if you get health insurance its not as good as it used to be.

==
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=341

Women also lose in that 51 percent live without a spouse and on pay that is 77 percent of what a man made in 1973. That’s a pretty hard life. If they are a single mom on 77 percent of what a man made in 1973 that is harsher still.

Immigration is leaving many women unmarried, perhaps childless, or perhaps single moms. With men earning what they did in 1973, they aren’t able to pay much child support, and many just skip out because they earn so little.

Mary Jo Kopechne was a secretary when she was left to die in an air pocket by Kennedy at Chappaquiddick. The scenario experienced by women , pay at under 77 percent of men’s and men’s pay frozen at the 1973 level, and a 51 percent chance to live without a spouse would have been her life had Kennedy let her live, albeit under his 1965 Immigration Act. This is what Kennedy calls upside.

==Mary Jo Kopechne Scenario

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Jo_Kopechne

Mary Jo Kopechne (July 26, 1940July 18, 1969) was an American teacher, secretary and administrator, notable for her death in a car accident on Chappaquiddick Island in a car driven by Senator Ted Kennedy.”

Ytedk archive site

also

July 20, 2004, 9:44 a.m.
Remembering Mary Jo
35 years later: Ted Kennedy’s under-investigated scandal.
Myrna Blyth National Review Online
If she had worked to 2007, she would have retired at age 67. That would have been as a teacher, secretary and administrator. She would have made typically less than 77 percent of what a man made her entire career. Because men’s wages topped out in 1973, she would have made no more than 77 percent of what a man made in 1973. That is what would have happened to her under Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act, if she hadn’t suffered under Kennedy’s 1969 Chappaquiddick Act.

http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p60-231.pdf

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040900105&start=41

Immigration kept men’s median wages to the 1973 level, and women’s wages to under 77 percent of men. That was legal immigration from Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. With zero immigration, women’s wages would have reached parity with men long ago. In addition, men’s median wages would be higher than in 1973.

Search p60-231.pdf and go to census.gov to see a graph on page 18 that shows men’s median wages are less than in 1973 and that women’s ratio to men’s wages went from 60 percent in 1960 to 77 percent in 2005. They were kept from going higher by immigration which has targeted women’s jobs, e.g. cleaning and nursing.

==

amonster | Apr 9, 2007 8:26:05 PM great find.

quote

Labor Day is almost upon us, and like some of my fellow graybeards, I can, if I concentrate, actually remember what it was that this holiday once celebrated. Something about America being the land of broadly shared prosperity. Something about America being the first nation in human history that had a middle-class majority, where parents had every reason to think their children would fare even better than they had.
The young may be understandably incredulous, but the Great Compression, as economists call it, was the single most important social fact in our country in the decades after World War II. From 1947 through 1973, American productivity rose by a whopping 104 percent, and median family income rose by the very same 104 percent. More Americans bought homes and new cars and sent their kids to college than ever before. In ways more difficult to quantify, the mass prosperity fostered a generosity of spirit: The civil rights revolution and the Marshall Plan both emanated from an America in which most people were imbued with a sense of economic security.

That America is as dead as the dodo. Ours is the age of the Great Upward Redistribution.
end quote.

from Devaluing Labor By Harold Meyerson
Wednesday, August 30, 2006; Page A19
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082901042.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

Since 1973, men’s median wages are unchanged, see p60-231.pdf page 18 graph. Women’s wages were 60 percent of men’s in 1960 and are 77 percent in 2005.So women’s wages are less than 77 percent of what men’s wages were in 1973. This shows that before immigration, from 1947 to 1973, productivity and median wages went up 1 for 1. Since then, its all been to the shareholders, many of them rich senators like McCain and Kennedy.

==
Further comment on Meyerson quote that amonster | Apr 9, 2007 8:26:05 PM found above. quote

More Americans bought homes and new cars and sent their kids to college than ever before. In ways more difficult to quantify, the mass prosperity fostered a generosity of spirit: The civil rights revolution and the Marshall Plan both emanated from an America in which most people were imbued with a sense of economic security. end quote

Those words are so true. America was once so much more of a family than it is today. Today it is a Bush Hobbesian land. America was so much better 25 years ago. It was so much safer to walk at night. There was so much less fear.

Children could play on their own and roam and get into trouble. They were safe. Probably, no one on earth will ever know a land that great and good for centuries and possibly millenia to come.

You can see what America was in the movies from decades ago. That was once real and it was America. It was so safe and so more unified.

read more | digg story

Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act smited Graham family’s stability

February 19, 2007

Two posts at Vdare by Patrick Cleburne and Randall Burns lead into this article’s discussion of how Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act harmed the family of Senator Lindsey Graham while he and his sister were growing up. Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act created income inequality and economic insecurity to further undermine Senator Lindsey Graham and his sister’s start in life when both their parents died.

If you look at p60-191.pdf at Census.gov they have a graph showing income inequality went down from the start of statistics in the 1940’s to bottom out at the time of the 1965 Immigration Act and started up after 1968 and has gone up ever since. Men’s median wages flattened in 1973 and in 2005 were below 1973. See p60-229.pdf graph page 14. Most Senators timed the income inequality graph perfectly, coming of age as young adults when income inequality was low from the 1940’s to 1960’s and then building or increasing fortunes as income inequality increased from 1968 to the present.

In an earlier article, Graham was compared to several other senators who sponsored or cosponsored the S. 2611 amnesty bill who unlike Graham benefited from low income inequality when they started out as young adults and high income inequality in their peak earning years. Several Senators who conspored S. 2611 built or deepened fortunes from the misfortunes of others on the income inequality graph.

From an earlier Old Atlantic article:

The lives of Arlen Specter and the 6 cosponsors of S. 2611 are reviewed at the end of the article in terms of how they fit on the income inequality graph. Arlen Specter, John McCain and Ted Kennedy were born in the 1930’s and became young adults in the 1950’s while income inequality was falling. They could build careers and have families while still young. Two Senators, Chuck Hagel and Mel Martinez were born in 1946. They became 21 in 1967. They had families and full careers as they timed the income inequality graph perfectly, low income inequality when they were young and rising while they got on top. Both became rich on this curve.

Lindsey Graham and Sam Brownback were born in the mid 1950’s. Graham had to start out as the curve was getting worse. He had to choose a career or family and chose career. He has never had children. Brownback solved this problem by marrying an heiress and has 5 children and a career. Brownback is running for president.

Patrick Cleburne comments on the prior Old Atlantic article at Vdare.com:
The Senate: In an Income Time Warp?”

Patrick Cleburne

A large number of Americans appear to have realized that income inequality has increased and that massive immigration is substantially responsible. And they are increasingly willing to say so.

A frequently-expressed view of Peter Brimelow’s is that the current generation of political “leaders” was formed intellectually before immigration was discernable as a social problem. Quite possibly they will literally have to die off before public policy will change – people rarely have new ideas.

Personally, though, I still think the more persuasive explanation is that these Senators are selfish, corrupt, and unAmerican.

Mr. Cleburne has some kind words for a previous Old Atlantic column and this blogger, which I thank him for. I am only too well aware of the editing work needed for this blog and I thank my readers for putting up with it.

What To Do With The Senate?” Randall Burns at Vdare.com

Randall Burns deepens our understanding of the comparison of the lives of the Senators by providing information on the life of Lindsey Graham. Burns points out that Graham helped to take care of a sister when both of their parents died.

His sister was taken in by relatives and Graham arranged to do his law school education near to where she was living and also with the military’s assent adopted her so she could take advantage of military health care.

As Burns points out, this was not selfish on the part of Graham. But in the context of the discussion here and in Mr. Cleburne’s column, Graham was distinguished from the selfish Senators as illustrating the impact of economic insecurity as he reached young adulthood. The other Senators’ lives illustrated selfishness and attributing to themselves the advantage of the timing of their birth on the income inequality graph.

The loss of both parents can only be a shock to the sense of economic security of any person. Since Graham had a minor sister at the time, that can only deepen that sense of economic insecurity. In the comparison of the lives above, Graham illustrated how economic insecurity was higher in the late 1970’s and 1980’s as income inequality was going up from its low in 1968 as the effects of Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act cut in.

By pointing this episode out, Burns deepens our understanding of this. Graham was subject to two shocks, one was the loss of his parents while he had a minor sister and the other was the rising tide of income inequality from Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. This meant it would be harder for her to have a job during school or for her relatives to support her who had taken her in.

In fact, Graham tells us she got 600 dollars per month from Social Security and that she needed that money. This shows how social security had taken the place for the Graham family of a job market with job shortages and high wages, which is the historic basis of income security for all but the rich.

Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act had taken from the Graham family the economic opportunity it needed both before and after the loss of Graham’s parents. The Kennedy 1965 Immigration Act had left the Graham family unprepared except by social security and the kindess of relatives for one of life’s blows, the loss of the two parents. We can infer that Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act kept Graham’s parents from having sufficient life insurance, and that they couldn’t afford sufficient life insurance because Kennedy took away the wages of both of Graham’s parents with his 1965 Immigration Act.

2001 Abortions 1,303,000 Legal Immigrants 1,064,318

February 13, 2007

NRLC Abortions 2001 1,303,000

FAIRUS 2001 Legal Immigrants 1,064,318

This shows that immigration is substitution for births.  If we stopped immigration completely, legal and illegal, we would just balance the effect of abortions.

CATEGORIES CEILINGS 2001
ADMISSIONS
Relatives 676,144
Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens Unlimited 443,984
Unmarried Adult Children of U.S. Citizens 23,400 27,098
Spouses & Unmarried Adult Children of Legal Residents 114,200 112,260
Married Adult Children of U.S. Citizens 23,400 24,878
Siblings of U.S. Citizens 65,000 67,907
Legalization Dependents 37
Employment-Based Preferences 179,195
Priority Workers 40,040 41,801
Professionally Exceptional 40,040 42,620
Skilled Workers and Professionals 40,040 86,058
Special Immigrants 9,940 8,523
Investors 9,940 193
Other 208,979
Lottery 55,000 42,015
Refugees 90,000 97,305
Asylees 10,000 11,201
Miscellaneous 58,458
LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, TOTAL (est.) 1,064,318

Illegal, who knows. Could be 1 to 2 million per year. Total here could be 10 to 30 million. These numbers are always far more than anyone imagines. 1986 Amnesty brought in far more people than even the most extreme criticis predicted.

==Brimelow:

And if there is a looming labor shortage (hotly disputed), it could presumably be countered by natalist policies—encouraging Americans to step up their below-replacement birthrate. Even the current high immigration inflow is exceeded by the 1.6 million abortions in the U.S. each year.

“Time to Rethink Immigration?”

by Peter Brimelow
from National Review, June 22, 1992

Mr. Brimelow is Editor at VDARE.com.

http://www.vdare.com/pb/time_to_rethink2.htm

 http://www.vdare.com/misc/070212_smith.htm
February 12, 2007
“U.S. Chamber Urging Country On Rome’s Path To Disaster”

I find it ironic that the US Chamber of Commerce is promoting a report “America’s Perfect Storm: Three Forces Changing Our Nation’s Future,” [PDF] (press release here). The report, by ETS’s Policy Information Center, contends that the convergence of three forces—inadequate literacy skills among large segments of our population, the continuing evolution of our economy and the nation’s job structure, and an ongoing shift in the demographic profile of our country driven by the highest immigration rates in almost a century—will have “dire consequences for America”.

==

By Steve Smith

Barbary Pirates Torture of Christians and Jews

December 23, 2006

Pictures of Barbary Pirates tortures of European Christians and Jews.

also hereSearch Barbary Pirates torture. First hit is pictures from British Library of torture by Barbary Pirates. These pictures are from 1637. The torture continued for 200 more years. All the time those against it were called Islamophobic, not.

Over 1 million Europeans, Christians and Jews, were taken by the Barbary Pirates up to the 1800’s.

When the US asked them why, they said God commands them to.

My security code is sound. As you look at the pictures, think of the sounds the people made. The Muslim torturers wanted to hear that. Why?

Because they wanted non-Muslims to fear Muslims. They want Islamophobia, its in the Koran. God commands non-Muslims to be Islamophobes.

Posted by: Old Atlantic

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002227.php

search Barbary Pirates torture

Reference —

Record Number: nhil 021 0001349
Shelfmark: C.80.a.2
Page Folio Number: 412 – 413
Description: Scenes of torture, carried out by the Barbary pirates or Corsairs. Twenty-two scenes.
Title of Work: Histoire de Barbarie, et des Corsaires…
Author: Pierre, Dan
Illustrator:
Production: Pierre Rocolet, Paris, 1637
Language/Script: French / –
All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the above description, but the British Library cannot accept responsibility for any errors that may occur.

http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/britishlibrary/controller/subjectidsearch?id=8126&&idx=1&startid=2051

Barbary Pirates at Vdare (they have a fund raising drive and are short of money on it.)
Peter Brimelow, “Are Mexican Immigrants The New Barbary Pirates?”.

Barbary Pirates site:Vdare.com

http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,1166849,00.html

His (Robert Davis) new book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, concluded that 1 million to 1.25 million ended up in bondage.

See “New book reopens old arguments about slave raids on Europe” “US scholar claims more than 1m people were captured by African pirates”

Rory Carroll, Africa correspondent
Thursday March 11, 2004
The Guardian
Modern Tribalist

Cartoon Jihad cover of Weekly Standard

Those who deny the origin or cause of genocide or mass slavery are a type of genocide denier. Denying that Muhammed and the Koran commanded this genocide and slavery is genocide denial. Denying that the Koran and Muhammed are part of Islam, and that Islam commanded this genocide is genocide denial. Its the same as denying Hitler and Mein Kampf were part of the Holocaust in World War II.

This article is hypotheses, speculation or opinion.  This is draft and preliminary. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: