Archive for the 'Statue of Liberty' Category

The Rise of Income Inequality and the Rise of the Jews.

September 9, 2010

Income inequality is U shaped in 20th century. It fell during immigration restriction and rose after it. See graph below:

http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entry/2266026/

Timothy Noah


Over the next two weeks, I’ll try to answer that question by looking at all potential explanations—race, gender, the computer revolution, immigration, trade, government policies, the decline of labor, compensation policies on Wall Street and in executive suites, and education.

And he will claim none of them cause it?

==Steve Sailer at Vdare

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/091025_podhoretz.htm

After all, back in 1987, Jews made up 92 of the Forbes 400 richest people in America, according to Nathaniel Weyl’s 1989 book, The Geography of American Achievement. This month, however, after 22 years in which power at the federal level has been fairly evenly split between the two parties, Jacob Berkman, who covers Jewish philanthropists for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, estimated that in the newly released 2009 Forbes 400:

“At least 139 of the Forbes 400 are Jewish”

That’s an increase of about one-half over 22 years.

Hence, Jews, who comprise about 1/50th of the population, are 1/3rd or more of the Forbes 400. On a per capita basis, Jewish-Americans are roughly 25 times more likely than other Americans to be billionaires.

==

If we look at the percentage of non-Jewish Whites at Harvard it falls from
1965 to the present. Its now under 25 percent roughly. A similar figure applies to Stanford. We could regress income inequality against the percentage of non-Whites including Jews at Harvard or Stanford. Or we could use one over the percentage of non-Jewish Whites. Both of these went up during this period. This may be a regression not seen in economic journals. Wonder who edits them?

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5. However, the numbers come out, its 10 to 25 percent non-Jewish white. That is the Camp of the Saints being done to FSA’s by Jews.

http://www.onenation.org/1198/111698b.html

Some Minorities Are More Minor than Others

Ron K. Unz
Wall Street Journal
Monday, November 16, 1998.

“For example, Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.”

“In fact, it seems likely that non-Jewish white Americans represent no more than a quarter of Harvard undergraduates, even though this group constitutes nearly 75% of the population at large, resulting in a degree of underrepresentation far more severe than that of blacks, Hispanics or any other minority groups.”

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates. Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

Elite Jews have succeeded in ethnically cleansing non-Jewish whites who founded Harvard from Harvard. Elite Jews use their position to enforce immigration that genocides whites. These are combined with Department of Labor rules that give priority to hiring non-whites in every job linked to government contracts.

Internet Applicant Recordkeeping rule

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/faqs/iappfaqs.htm

What is the purpose of the Internet Applicant final rule?

The Internet Applicant final rule, issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), addresses recordkeeping by Federal contractors and subcontractors about the Internet hiring process and the solicitation of race, gender, and ethnicity of “Internet Applicants.” The rule is the product of a lengthy deliberative process, including public input, to develop a definition of “Internet Applicant” applicable in the Internet age (added to 41 CFR 60-1.3). The recordkeeping requirements of the rule (amending 41 CFR 60-1.12) will provide meaningful data that OFCCP will use to enhance its enforcement of the nondiscrimination laws.

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/Presentation/Applicant%20Rule%20Presentation_files/frame.htm

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/aa.htm

Operation of the Executive Order Program. The EEO Clause
Each contracting agency in the Executive Branch of government must include the equal opportunity clause in each of its nonexempt government contracts. The equal opportunity clause requires that the contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic individuals are considered minorities for purposes of the Executive Order.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/steve-sailer/jewish-influence/

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/09/08/129728016/income-more-unequal-in-u-s-than-in-parts-of-latin-america?ft=1&f=1001

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/income-inequality-graph/

Fertility is an inverse U

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://data.princeton.edu/eco572/uspctfr.png&imgrefurl=http://data.princeton.edu/eco572/heuser.html&usg=__gT-EVtEKKf6f9NBg__PDi6Oj6ko=&h=374&w=553&sz=15&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=j0nVBUVkdjZoHM:&tbnh=124&tbnw=183&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfertility%2Bus%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26channel%3Ds%26biw%3D800%26bih%3D393%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=369&vpy=87&dur=403&hovh=124&hovw=183&tx=96&ty=88&ei=XdSITOSlEYWClAem5JS0Dg&oei=XdSITOSlEYWClAem5JS0Dg&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=6&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0

http://www.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=fertility+us&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=800&bih=393

See Patrick Cleburne on Vdare

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2239/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/20/robert-novak-old-atlantic-lighthouse-votes-no/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/latino-revolution/

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-substitution-effect/

Thus the rise of the Jews is linked to factors lowering the income of Whites. Jewish oligarchs push those factors, non-White immigration, Asians replacing Whites in tech jobs, know-how transfer to non-Whites, etc.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/slicer-coalition/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/paul-krugman/

Krugman wrings his hands over rising income inequality, but Princeton and MIT do all they can to increase it by race replacement of Whites in their institutions. Genocide of Whites by immigration has led to income inequality that favors wealth Jewish Oligarchs, Jewgarchs. This is Jewgarchy, rule by Jewish Oligarchs. That is what ruined Russia in the 1990’s after the fall of the Soviet Union. That was funded by Jewarchs Larry Summers (US Treasury) and Stanley Fischer (MIT).

Putin offered Stanley Fischer a job in Russia as a joke:

Stanley Fischer chaired Ben Bailout Bernanke’s Ph.D. thesis at MIT. Jewarch Bernanke bailed out Jewgarchs at Goldman Sachs. Jewarchy, rule by Jews, and Jewgarchy, Rule by Jewish Oligarchs, have been bad for Whites.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/06/04/new-study-on-jewish-genes/

By Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times

Jews of European descent living on opposite sides of the globe are more closely related to one another than they are to their fellow countrymen, according to the largest study ever conducted of what it means genetically to be Jewish. Ashkenazis, the primary group descended from European Jews, are all as closely related as fourth or fifth cousins would be, the study found.

http://www.vdare.com/hoste/100709_immigration_policy.htm

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SlezkineRev.pdf


This reminds me of Jews as an elite in the Soviet Union, where a nascent Jewish elite motivated by moral fervor and hatred unleashed by their exclusion under the Czar morphed easily into a corrupt, nepotistic elite that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of Russia. A report to the Soviet Central Committee reminds me of Kagan’s route to success: “They gather around themselves people of the same nationality, impose the habit of praising one another (while making others erroneously believe that they are indispensable), and force their protégés through to high posts” (see here, p. 78). Another report, from 1942, noted that elite cultural institutions “turned out to be filled by non-Russian people (mainly by Jews)” (see here , p. 51, ff). For example, of the ten top executives of the Bolshoi Theater—the most prestigious Soviet cultural institution—there were eight Jews and one Russian. Similar disproportions were reported in prestigious musical conservatories, the Soviet Academy of Science Institute of Literature, and among art and music reviewers in elite publications. Ethnic nepotism, not IQ, is the only way to explain these disproportions.

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SAIDchap2.pdf

http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/28/magazine/inside-the-meritocracy-machine.html?pagewanted=7

http://mondoweiss.net/2010/01/the-meritocracy-and-jewish-kinship-networks.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/opinion/12brooks.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=opinion&adxnnlx=1284037262-MNc9RRjWf2HhJl17PnyCYw

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/opinion/19douthat.html

The Roots of White Anxiety
By ROSS DOUTHAT
Published: July 18, 2010

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/ross-douthat-on-roots-of-white-anxiety.html

http://mangans.blogspot.com/2010/07/anti-white-racism-of-hostile-elite.html

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/06/jewish-intellectuals-endorse-kevin.html

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

http://www.americanbuddhist.net/roots-white-anxiety

“Kevin MacDonald: Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities explained”

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

One might simply suppose that this is due to higher Jewish IQ. However, on the basis of Richard Lynn’s estimates of Ashkenazi Jewish IQ and correcting for the greater numbers of European Whites, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews should be around 7 to 1 (IQ >130) or 4.5 to 1 (IQ > 145). Instead, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews is around 1 to 1 or less. (See here.)

So there must be some other reason besides IQ that Jews are such a large percentage of the population classified as White at elite universities.

Espenshade and Radford show that there is discrimination against poor Whites and against non-urban Whites—exactly the population groups that are least likely to be Jewish.

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

“A comment on Paul Gottfried’s review of Cultural Insurrections”

Kevin MacDonald

April 18, 2009

==

The extent to which we live under Jewarchy (rule by Jews like Bernanke, Summers, Stanley Fischer, Norbert Schlei, etc. ) and Jewgarchy (Mayor Bloomberg, Schumer, Arlen Specter, ) and who manifest their dislike of us ( “comedians” attacking Sarah Palin over and over), we have to be free to talk about it and analyze it. This means in writing and build on the work of others, Steve Sailer, Kevin MacDonald, Vdare, Alternative Right, Occidental Dissent, Occidental Quarterly, etc.

For Whites in America, to an ever rising extent, Jews are our oppressors. Because of this we have the right to talk about it. Because of this we have the right to decide if we want separation from those who oppress us. This is the same as in Russia. Jewgarchs like Bloomberg openly side with Muslims against us. This is the same as Spain.

We have the right to separate from a separate nation, The Jewish People, who do not identify with us and who advocate policies reducing us to poverty and ultimately dispossession and extinction. Jews are related to each other more than any European population they live in.

Their close genetic kinship shows that Jews are not White and are a separate people, one that shows its antipathy and disdain with Whites. They show that in their constant attacks on Sarah Palin. They show that in their attacks on Vigil Goode. They funded his being defeated.

They show their antipathy to Whites as a separate people they disdain in their attacks on Whites in the debate on what has become their Ground Zero Mosque. To the Jewarchy, the Ground Zero Mosque is a symbol comparable to Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty of their dispossession of Founding Stock Americans and their rise to mastery in America. In fact, the Ground Zero Mosque now joins Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty as the Jewish Trinity of Symbols of the Dispossession of Founding Stock Americans in particular and Whites in general.

The Bailout was the action of an insider network. The bailout proved that financial services is not a competitive market but an insider network. The insider network spans Wall Street, academia, the Council of Economic Advisers, the Federal Reserve, US Treasury and the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. Econ profs circulate between these as well as IMF and World Bank and other stations such as major media.

This insider network is an antitrust violation. What we saw in the bailout was a massive antitrust violation. This is an insiders network not a competitive market. The Jewish ethno-network of Jewish mandarins and oligarchs, The Elite Jewish Nation, is the glue that binds this network together across academia, Wall Street and government.

The elite Jewish ethno-network staffs these nodes and their people circulate from node to node in their careers. Wall Street builds the nice buildings for econ departments and B-schools that house the econ profs who run the Antitrust Division, Federal Reserve, US Treasury, Council of Economic Advisers, and other spots as well. The Law and Economics movement cements in the law schools and the courts with this network.

Advertisements

Sarah Palin immigrants built this country fallacy

February 2, 2010

A commenter at Lawrence Auster earlier transcribed a portion of the Sarah Palin peon to immigration on Glenn Beck.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015344.html

Paul K transcribed Sarah Palin on Glenn Beck on immigration

Palin:

Let me address legal immigration. We need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty. The immigrants, of course, built this country, and I think Republicans, conservatives, are at fault when we allow the other side to capture this immigration issue and try to turn this issue into something negative for Republicans. I think we need to recognize that, again, immigrants built this great country. There are rules to follow if you want to be part of this great country–let’s be sure people are following those rules–but let’s welcome this.

This was discussed earlier here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/sarah-palin-v-wright-island-model-on-immigration-why-math/

Allan Wall at Vdare discusses the same portion of the Glenn Beck program.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/02/01/sarah-palin-on-legal-immigration/

Rereading the passage, the following fallacies stand out.

  1. Immigrants have a common identity.
  2. Immigrants built this country.
  3. Immigrants today bear an identity with immigrants in the past.
  4. There are rules to follow to be part of this country.

If we follow the same line of loose thinking, consider that immigrants today are tearing down this country.  Are the immigrants who tear down the country the same as the ones who built it up?  Clearly not.  Are they following some rules to be part of this country?  Other than the rule of erasing the national pattern of those who came before them?

Immigrants do not have a common identity by being immigrants.  Animals and seeds also are immigrants, but that doesn’t make them have a common identity with each other or with us.  Invasive species of fish do not have a common identity with each other or with native species.

Those who built the country in the past are the natives today and the immigrants coming here are tearing the country down.  The immigrants today are an invasive species. They are erasing the national pattern of the native founding stock Americans.  So did the immigrants of the late 19th century and early 20th century.

Emma Goldman came here from Russia and participated in an assassination conspiracy on Frick.  That inspired a son of immigrants from Poland to assassinate President McKinley.   Were those rules to be followed to be part of this country?  Or rules to race replace the people who came before and erase their national pattern?  Leon Trotsky came in 1917 and later developed the words racist and racism to race replace Founding Stock Americans, a separate nation of their own.

The assassinations, including Wall Street bombings later, were not building the country up, it was tearing it down.  It was an attack on the social fabric.  Moreover, they intended it that way.  They intended to ethnically cleanse the Wasps and with Trotsky inventing the words racist and racism to race replace whites in general, particularly non-Jewish whites.

Maps of settlement in New England show this pattern, e.g. in Boston and in parts of New York City.  Wasps are now almost completely cleansed from New York City, a city they founded and Boston.   Non-Jewish whites are 20 percent at Harvard, so Founding Stock Americans are less than that, say 10 percent.  That is erasing the national pattern.  Founding Stock Americans built Harvard.  Now their national pattern is erased by immigrants from Eastern Europe as well as from the 3rd world.

Immigrants have no common identity.  No more than all flying things have a common identity or all walking things or all swimming things have a common identity.  In each case, they feed on each other.  That is not common identity.

Species replace others in the air, land and seas not because they are the same, but because they are different.  So it is with immigrants.  They replace the gene lineages.  They erase the national pattern. They prefer their own as Obama and Sotomayor do.

The one thing that binds the recent immigrants together is hatred of those who have come before them and a determination to erase them from Harvard, Standford, Berkeley and UCLA so that they can erase them from Boston, New York City, Los Angeles and San Francisco-Oakland and vice versa.  What unites the immigrants of the recent past and those of the turn of the 19th into the 20th century is a common determination to race replace those who came before them. That is the fundamental rule they have.

Trotsky was just playing race replace the previous immigrants the same thing by inventing racism and racist.  Trotsky was just another immigrant to the Americas pursuing race replacement of those who came before his race.   Trotsky was just putting his people first like other immigrant cohorts do that are distinct by race from those already here.

Their rule is race replace those here.  Their rule is use the resources of society to have a higher birth rate and race replace those here. Their rule is erase the national pattern of those who came here before.  Rename the streets.  Claim they built America when they didn’t.

Their rules are lie, steal and corrupt.  Lie about who built the country.  Lie about the uniqueness of the people who built.  Lie that its a proposition nation when in fact its not.

Their rules are as follows. Steal the land.  Corrupt the government to favor them.  Tax and eliminate those who came before them.  Those are the rules immigrants who came after the founding of America have played by.  Consistently and to the last.

The result is plain in the maps of ethnicity around America and in the proportion of non-Jewish whites at Harvard, Stanford, UCLA and Berkeley.  The percentage of FSA’s is even lower, in the 10 percent range at universities their ancestors founded for their posterity, their genetic posterity.

Sarah Palin is playing by their rules.

We need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty

The immigrants reclaimed the Statue of Liberty as theirs.  They changed its meaning from a gift from the French people to Founding Stock Americans to them.  That’s how immigrant cohorts lie.  They claim the Statue of Liberty as a symbol to them when its a symbol of the friendship of the French people and Founding Stock Americans.  It was not friendship between the French people and Jews.    It was a lie to say it meant 19th century immigrants and not Founding Stock Americans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Lazarus

Lazarus was the fourth of seven children of Moshe Lazarus and Esther Nathan, Portuguese Sephardic Jews[4] whose families had been settled in New York since the colonial period.

She invented the lie that the Statue of Liberty represented late 19th century immigrants and not the Founding Stock Americans.  She also showed that despite her lineage being here from the founding, she didn’t identify with Founding Stock Americans but with Jews from Eastern Europe.  Those were her people.  Those are who she identified with.  She invented the lie that the Statue of Liberty symbolized her people and not Founding Stock Americans.

Her lie was a denial about what the Statue of Liberty really represented, the Founding Stock Americans and their alliance with the French people.  An alliance is about the two parties to the alliance, not about abstract alliances independent of the parties.

Her denial of which people and which nation the Statue of Liberty represented was part of erasing the national pattern of FSA’s.  It was about erasing their nation and what it really was, the creation of a distinct people, and replacing it by her people, her nation, and saying it was about them.  It showed that her people, despite living here since the founding, had never identified with the Founding Stock Americans.

Her lie about which people the Statue of Liberty represents is part of the race replacement of Founding Stock Americans by her people.  Its the race replacement of one nation by another nation. We see that on the ethnicity maps of New York city and the statistics on students at Harvard and elsewhere.

It is a lie when the 19th century immigrants, the race replacers of FSA’s, say on the Fourth of July that it symbolizes them. They lie on TV.  Their politicians lie.  Its not about them.  Its about Founding Stock Americans.  They are race replacing FSA’s as the statisics from Harvard show and as the ethnicity maps of New York City and Boston and coastal New England from Boston to New York City show.

Its a lie when Jews say the Statue of Liberty symbolizes Jews and not Founding Stock Americans.  Trotsky came to New York in 1917.  As an immigrant to the Americas later he invented the words racist and racism precisely because his fortunes now lay with race replacement of the Wasps who came before the Jews.  There is a line that connects Emma Lazarus to Emma Goldman to Leon Trotsky to Emanuel Cellar to Norbert Schlei to Charles Schumer.

The very words racism and racist were invented by Trotksy as words to lie with about race replacement.  Denial of ethnic and racial identity is part of the lies of Marxism.  That is a war on the people themselves.  It is why Marxism has contempt for the petit bourgeois and the working class alike.

Marxism’s contempt and disdain for the middle class and working class turn into hate and are hate.  This is the same process we see in Congress where disdain and contempt by Senators and Congressman for voters who vote for them after they vote for race replacement of the voters turns into hate and a physical need in the rulers to harm the ruled.   The same pattern played out in Russia under Trotsky and the Bolsheviks.  Race replacement in America is the same movement as Bolshevism and has common players like Trotsky.

More on the Statue of Liberty and the lies and tricks of 19th century immigrants to falsely misrepresent its meaning and which people it symbolized.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/statue-of-liberty/

The Statue of Liberty symbolizes the victims of race replacement immigration, the Founding Stock Americans.  Hispanics also don’t identify with it the way Jews in New York do.  Jews in New York have turned it into their symbol just as they have taken over the city and ethnically cleansed FSA’s from it by using follow on immigration since 1965.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

That is exactly what is done by saying the Statue of Liberty represents late 19th century immigrants and not FSA’s.

Also see here

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/july-4-is-founding-stock-american-separation-day/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/generalized-genocide/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/generalized-genocide/

July 4 is Founding Stock American Separation Day

July 6, 2009

July 4, 1776 was the day that Founding Stock Americans said they were a single people, American.  July 4 is when FSA’s said they as a separate people need a separation country.  July 4 is when FSA’s said that when non-FSA’s rule us, they oppress us.  This is the real meaning of July 4, 1776 and the Declaration of Independence.

Founding Stock Americans are a separate people who need a separate country.  When others rule us they oppress us.  Therefore we need our own separate country.

The Slicer Coalition, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Jews are working slicer games against us that are designed to give us no say in our present or our future.  The Slicer Coalition say that its immoral for FSA’s to have associations of their own of any kind.  That includes Harvard University.  That includes local regions of FSA’s only.  They settle Somalis, Hmong, etc. among us to deny us the right of association.

Slicers say that FSA’s can not talk back or object to what is done t them, because that is immoral.  Slicers say FSA’s don’t get to set the rules under which FSA’s live.  Slicers set those rules to economically harm FSA’s so that their numbers will dwindle.

Slicers set policies to cause the ultimate extinction of FSA’s.  But first FSA’s lose more and more say over their own lives and their future.  This is the meaning to Slicers of July 4, to dispossess FSA’s of their country and any say in the rules of society.

The Statue of Liberty in reality is a gift from the French people to the FSA people.  It is a symbol of the FSA French alliance of the Revolution and Louisiana Purchase.    These were acts between two peoples, the FSA’s and the French people.  The Statue of Liberty signals the Declaration of Independence that FSA’s can only have Liberty when they have their own separate country, free from Slicers.

Slicers are the oppressors of FSA’s.  They conceive slicing games of all kinds to weaken FSA’s economically, taxwise, politically, morally and in religion.  Immigration, affirmative action, laws against association by FSA’s, laws against promotion, hiring, retention, bonuses, etc. for FSA’s by FSA’s.  Laws against FSA free speech.

Slicers progress to absolute despotism over FSA’s whom they have wronged.  Slicers believe they have to finish off FSA’s before FSA’s can react with righteous outrage at what Slicers do to FSA’s.  Slicers mean to cause FSA numbers to dwindle to zero before they can react.  Slicers oppress FSA’s to keep them in check until their numbers dwindle.

The Declaration of Independence says that FSA’s are a separate people and that the answer to this type of oppression by Slicers is separation.   The universal meaning of the DofI is that when a slicer coalition of different people oppress a distinct people, that the people oppressed must have their own country to recover Liberty and Survival.  Separation has to precede Liberty and Survival for FSA’s from Slicers.

Every July 4 is FSA Separation Day.  The Statue of Liberty signals FSA Separation from others.  That means separation from Slicers who are oppressing FSA’s and trying to end them having any say in their lives or their future.  Slicers twist the Constitution to turn it into meaning a compact to give FSA’s no say in their own lives or own laws.  This shows separation has to precede Liberty and Survival.  Those come from separation from Slicers.

The meaning of July 4 is FSA Separation Day. FSA’s need and deserve their own country.  Only separation will secure Liberty and Survival to FSA’s.  Only Separation will give FSA’s the rights in the Constitution which Slicers deny them.  That includes association, religion, speech, trial by FSA jury, and the freedom from Slicer oppression in regulating every aspect of FSA life.

The Statue of Liberty symbolizes that FSA’s fought for their separation and won it and that this is why FSA’s had Liberty and Survival including the right of FSA only association.  Separation must precede Liberty and Survival or Slicers will oppress FSA’s using the law and Constitution as tools to oppress FSA’s and deny FSA’s the right of FSA only association and to make their own rules and laws.  This is what the fireworks symbolize.  This is what the National Anthem symbolizes.  These all symbolize FSA separation from Slicers who will inherently oppress FSA’s if given any power over them of any kind.  Separation first, laws and Constitution second. This is the meaning of FSA Separation Day.

==Comment posted at Vanishing American

July 4 is when Founding Stock Americans said that FSA’s all by themselves are a separate people and will be oppressed automatically if ruled by any other people.  The French people aided FSA’s people to people in the Revolutionary War and the Louisiana Purchase.

The Statue of Liberty symbolizes the people to people friendship of those two acts of expansion of America.  America returned that in WWI and WWII. Obama would not have dinner with Sarkozy the president of France after Obama’s speech to the Ummah, the 57 state community or nation of Muslims.

July 4 is FSA Separation Day a day that symbolizes that FSA’s are a separate people who must have a separate country to secure Liberty and Survival to themselves and their posterity.  Separation first, Constitution second.  That is what the DofI, FSA Separation Day, and the Statue of FSA Liberty all symbolize.

The proposition is that FSA’s are a separate people who need a separate country to avoid the oppression of other people ruling over them.  The proposition is that all the rights in the Constitution won’t happen unless FSA’s have a separate country of their own.

If ruled by others, those others will twist whatever the law or Constitution says to mean oppression of FSA’s.  This means denying them speech, FSA only association in universities and schools and religion and business, and criminalizing ever more broadly any micro separation that FSA’s may manage to achieve. It means bringing Hmong, Somalis and others and settling them in FSA communities to deny FSA’s their last separation and FSA only existence.  This precedes the final extinction of FSA’s.

The meaning of the DofI is FSA’s are a separate people who can only have and keep Liberty and Survival by first having a separate country.  Separation first, Constitution second. July 4 FSA Separation Day, Statue of FSA Lost Liberty, the FSA Declaration of Independence all mean the same thing, FSA separation first, FSA constitution to codify the Liberty and Survival won by FSA separation from other peoples in the first place comes second. Keeping FSA Liberty means keeping FSA separation.  Liberty now means the liberty of others to oppress and condemn FSA’s.

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2009/07/hail-and-farewell-columbia.html

VA column on Miss Columbia who was already a figure used in the Revolutionary War to symbolize FSA’s as a separate people.  The Statue of Liberty is modeled on Miss Columbia, who symbolizes FSA’s as a separate people.  The Statue of Liberty symbolizes FSA Liberty that comes from FSA separation from other peoples.

==
The Declaration of Independence is written by FSA’s for FSA’s.  It says government of the FSA’s by the FSA’s is the only way for FSA’s to avoid the oppression of non FSA’s.  The DofI says FSA’s are a separate people, and any collection of non FSA’s will oppress them if given power to do so.  We have seen that Slicers have extended that oppression to every aspect of life.  Slicers regulate every moment of FSA life to oppress them and deny them Liberty and FSA only association.  The DofI says Slicers always do that if given power to rule us.  The DofI says the only solution is separation for FSA’s.

The DofI says FSA separation precedes FSA Liberty and Survival.  The DofI says that separation of FSA’s from other people is the only awy to keep and preserve FSA Liberty and Survival.  The DofI says otherwise, the others will extend their oppression and hostile regulation into every aspect of FSA lives and associations, giving them neither peace nor liberty.  The DofI says the others will take away from FSA’s any say in their own lives and instead substitute the rules of the others for every aspect of FSA lives.

The DofI is written by FSA’s for FSA’s.  Slicers say its not.  Slicers say its written for them.  Slicers say the Constitution is all that matters and the DofI is a dead letter. Slicers say they can regulate every aspect of FSA life and deny FSA’s the right to associate with FSA’s in schools, universities, business, or other associations.

Slicers bring Hmong and Somalis to settle in pure FSA communities to take away the lest vestige of FSA separation which the DofI says is the only basis of FSA liberty and survival.  Slicers deny liberty and survivel to FSA’s as rights and openly proclaim that FSA’s have no liberty or right to separate FSA association or separate FSA say in FSA’s own lives.  Instead, Slicers demand to regulate every aspect of FSA life and to deny FSA’s the right to associate among themselves.

Slicers say that the Constitution says FSA’s don’t have such a right and are to be regulated in every aspect of their life by Slicer Rules.  The DofI says to FSA’s that FSA separation is the only answer to regain FSA liberty and FSA survival.  The DofI says its separation or nothing.  Slicers say the same thing. So Slicers forbid the FSA’s the right to meet among themselves and work this out for themselves.

The DofI says the Constitution guarantees nothing without separation.  The Slicers say the same thing in effect.  The Slicers use the Constitution to deny FSA’s any say over their own lives and take away their freedom of association and settle Somalis among FSA’s to take away their peace and quiet which they built and earned.

==Two propositions now compete.

FSA’s are a separate people. Only FSA separation will bring FSA Liberty and FSA Survival.

Slicers say that the Constitution is Liberty for Slicers to make rules to govern every aspect of FSA lives. FSA’s get no effective say in the rules governing their association or speech.

These are the two propositions that are competing for what the Declaration of Independence and Constitution mean. These are the two propositions that are now in competition for FSA and white consciousness.

Slicers say the Statue of Liberty symbolizes Slicers as a separate people set apart and above FSA’s to rule FSA’s and to take the country away from FSA’s because FSA’s are inherently racist.  Slicers say that July 4 symbolizes new Slicers coming to America becoming citizens.   Slicers say FSA’s are inherently bigoted and that the FSA desire for separate assocation is racism and bigotry.  Thus Slicers say the Declaration of Independence is racism and bigotry because it says FSA’s are a separate people who deserve a separate country of their own to associate with FSA’s only.

The propositions are radically different.  However, at their core, they also have a kernel of agreement.  Both agree that FSA’s are a separate people.  Both agree that the only way for FSA’s to escape the oppression of the other people in America is separation.  The FSA Proposition of FSA Separation precedes FSA Survival and Liberty is the truth that can not be denied.

Slicers seek to rule over FSA’s and make rules over every aspect of FSA life denying them freedom to associate with other FSA’s and claiming the freedom to bring Somalis to settle in FSA communities.  Slicers proclaim that is what was written in the Constitution and DofI and that this is its “living” ie Slicer meaning. Slicers say they decide what the meanings of the DofI, Constitution, and Statue of Liberty are.  Slicers say those all mean Slicers are a people who are given the right to rule over FSA’s and to make rules to cause FSA’s to dwindle and ultimately cease to exist.

Slicers say its all about them, even in 1776.  Slicers say it all means they take over and take possession of this country. Slicers say it means they regulate every aspect of FSA life and deny FSA’s freedom of association with other FSA’s. Slicers say FSA’s have no right to separation at the micro or macro level.  Slicers say there is no escape for FSA’s.  Slicers say they are free to and in fact obligated to make rules that deny FSA’s freedom of association large or small and that will work economic hardship on FSA’s ultimately leading to the dwindling and extinction of FSA’s.  That is the Slicer Proposition.  That is the core agreement that binds the slicer coalition together, the making of harsh rules to govern FSA lives, unlike the rules governing Slicers, but like oppression by one people of another people in history.

In fact, Slicer rules against association by FSA’s are taken directly from rules of the Caliphate on Europeans under their rule.  That led utlimately to the ethnic cleansing of Europeans in the present Muslim lands. Slicer rules on FSA association are the same rules used to exterminate Europeans in the past.  They are now being used to do the same in the present.  Slicers say that is the proposition of this country because they say so and they have the power.

FSA’s must learn to recognize the core proposition of the FSA Declaration of FSA Independence.  FSA’s are a separate people who can only escape oppression by having a separate country.  That is true here and in the EU.  That is the only real path of hope for FSA’s.  FSA Separation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for FSA Liberty and FSA Survival.  That is the proposition in the Declaration of Independence.

Freedom from the Slicers requires separation from the Slicers.  Slicers oppress when they have power.  Given absolute power, Slicers oppress FSA’s absolutely.  That is the basic lesson of English Liberty from Locke to Acton from Magna Carta to the Declaration of Independence.  These documents speak of FSA rights to FSA separation. These documents speak of the FSA right of self-rule. These documents say that is the only way for FSA’s to escape the oppression of other distinct peoples.

==

What does Declaration of Independence mean?

Slicer answer: That they inherit America.  They are a separate people and this country is theirs.  They bring in more Slicers on July 4 every year.  They are the posterity of America.  America was founded on the proposition of genetic replacement.  The current rulers make the rules and those are to oppress the FSA’s.  The Constitution is a Living Constitution whose meaning is genetic replacement of FSA’s and that oppressive rules are made by Slicers to regulate every aspect of FSA life and forbid FSA association. Somalis are brought to settle among the last refuges of FSA’s to make this oppression total and complete.  The Somalis brought are set over the FSA’s the instant they are here.

FSA answer.  FSA’s are a separate people who can only escape oppression from others by separation first.  Only FSA separation will bring FSA liberty and survival.  FSA separation is the right and duty of FSA’s to achieve.  All that is guaranteed in the Constitution is empty rhetoric without FSA separation.  The only way to escape the oppression and rule making of non FSA’s that govern every aspect of FSA life and the settling of hostile peoples among FSA’s to disrupt FSA quite life is separation.  FSA’s can only associate with their own, have free speech of their own to express FSA ideas of their own is to have separation at the country level.

Statue of Lost Liberty reopens crown

July 5, 2009

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus

“The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”

Emma Lazarus

If that was said today, it would be called bigotry.  Its accurate.

It was in fact the same as the 1973 Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail.  What Raspail said the flotilla would do to Europe was not peering into the future without a compass.  His compass was what had already happened to America.  Camp of the Saints was as much the history of America up to 1973 from immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. America took them in and they betrayed America.  They ethnically cleansed Founding Stock Americans.  Camp of the Saints was an update of De Tocqueville’s Democracy in America.

What happened to America was that it was Camped on by the Saints of Ellis Island.   All the PC speech they have imposed, the new immigration they imposed that was non-white, the affirmative action they imposed was all Camp of the Saints action by them against Founding Stock Americans (FSA’s) whom they intentionally ethnically cleansed from Harvard and other universities, government, Boston, New York and everywhere they could get at them.  Somali settlements are a continuation of that against the last pockets of FSA’s.

http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/why-i-always-wind-up-defending-the-jews/

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

Jewish percentages at top schools.  You then have to subtract these numbers from the white percentage to get the non Jewish white percentage.  Its often less than the Jewish percentage.

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5.  However, the numbers come out, its 10 to 25 percent non-Jewish white.  That is the Camp of the Saints being done to FSA’s by Jews.

http://www.onenation.org/1198/111698b.html

Some Minorities Are More Minor than Others

Ron K. Unz
Wall Street Journal
Monday, November 16, 1998.

“For example, Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.”

“In fact, it seems likely that non-Jewish white Americans represent no more than a quarter of Harvard undergraduates, even though this group constitutes nearly 75% of the population at large, resulting in a degree of underrepresentation far more severe than that of blacks, Hispanics or any other minority groups.”

Who did that to them?  Ellis Island Jews did.  Camp of the Saints. Ellis Island is the Camp of the Saints.  Raspail simply wrote what happened in America as what would happen to Europe.  A great inside joke to him.

The numbers at Harvard have only gotten worse since 1998 for whites.  This is because each iteration of the Affirmative Action Slicing Game acts as a multiplier less than one to the previous percentage of whites.   Immigration and high birth rates increase blacks, Hispanics, and Asians who along with Jews are the non-white Slicer Coalition doing this to non Jewish whites.

Jews are behaviorally non-white when acting as part of the Slicer Coalition.  They get to be the top dog in this coalition because they are the verbal and legal elite in the Slicer Coalition.  Both Jewish Justices on the Supreme Court voted for affirmative action in Ricce v. Stefano, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Ginsburg.  Obama and Sotomayor are for that.   All of them in the Slicer Coalition.

The Statue of Liberty was given by France to the Founding Stock America that was their ally in 1776.  It symbolized the alliance of the two countries in the Revolutionary War and the sale by France of Louisiana to America.  That was a sale to the same Founding Stock American allies of France they funded in the Revolutionary War. France wanted to keep that alliance with America, so it sold it the second large section of its country.

The Statue of Liberty represented that.  It did not represent America becoming the excess population depository of Southern and Eastern Europe.   Those who came from those areas had no connection to the founding of the country.  To them, it was a place to colonize and conquer.  That is what they set about to do.

Jews set their sites on Harvard and were held up by quotas.   Eventually though they took it over and put quotas on non-Jewish whites.  Thus the Jews completely reversed the situation at Harvard.  It went from FSA’s putting quotas on Jews to Jews putting quotas on FSA’s.  FSA’s now are less under the Jewish imposed quotas than Jews were under FSA imposed quotas.  Yet Jews at Harvard continue to call whites racist, and use that to shut FSA’s out of Harvard.  Do they expect us to thank them for this?

No, they expect to finish us off before we get reverse it.  That is what they are doing by the continued non-white immigration of blacks, Hispanics and Asians.  Each iteration of this immigration then slices more from top and bottom.  The more blacks and Hispanics there are, the bigger slice taken off the bottom. The more Asians, the bigger slice taken off the top. The result is that each iteration of immigration and affirmative action slices whites thinner.

Affirmative action in society means that blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Jews get more resources from better jobs and job security to spend time teaching their young.  That makes more of them Harvard eligible at the top or bottom.  The result is they can slice out more whites.  The FSA share gets smaller and smaller.

Jews have succeeded in running FSA’s out of Harvard and silencing them about the information concealed by Harvard from USAO Mass from 1997 to present.  See Russia Plagiarism Files.  That was done by Larry Summers and his group including Elena Kagan and the Harvard Economics Department and Harvard Business School and Law School.

The affirmative action slicer game and other contractors of whites of the same type, slicer games, put whites at Harvard or DOJ into a state of fear.  This is why Harvard and its allies can cover up the use by Russia of plagiarism at Harvard, MIT and other schools to pressure profs.

Joel Brenner was in the Antitrust Division as a trial lawyer and is now head of Counter Intelligence.  He has pointed out Russia has a cold war level of kompromat and pressure but doesn’t give specifics.  The reason is that its the misconduct of this group.  Brenner in effect said Russia was kompromating the elite. What elite would that be?  The one running our country, Harvard, etc.  That elite.  What did Russia get?  The 20 billion in IMF loans. Who gave them that?  Summers and Stanley Fischer.  So what did Russia have on them?  The plagiarism by Fischer and Summers’ uncle in 1969 of Nils Hakansson.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN29426639

“But he said Moscow appears less interested in U.S. commercial and military technology than other countries”

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10785968

http://nationalstrategy.com/Programs/NationalStrategyForumReview/SpringSummer2009NSFROnlineJournal/FeatureEssayEconomicandIndustrialEspionage/tabid/189/Default.aspx

http://www.ncix.gov/publications/speeches/ABAspeech.pdf

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2007/03/29/HP/A/6196/ABA+Speech+on+Counterintelligence+Threats.aspx

The comments on Russia were in the Q and A session that are not in the official speech above.  You have to look at the video.   You can slide the bar at the bottom to the end.  Let it load 100 percent first.  Then slide the bar.  It may reload but it is still where you slid it to.  Those more technical may want to excerpt out the Q and A session remarks on Russia and put them on Youtube.  Please post a link in the comments if you are this enterprising.

In Q and A on Wen Ho-Lee case.   Excerpts: “Porous (or poor?) situation in national labs. Problems in national labs.  FBI has agents in the labs now.  Better software to monitor anomalous activity in the labs.  Labs not secure enough.  Dealing in labs with academic culture. … Hostile to notion there are people you shouldn’t talk to.”  Who are these academics in the national labs not protecting our info?  They are increasingly Asians and Jews, i.e. slicers.  They are giving our know-how away to the countries they identify with.  Those are their real nations and real homelands.  That is where they should go is a reasonable conclusion.

The Ellis Island Wave, especially Jews, have behaved exactly as in the Camp of the Saints.  It is the update to De Tocqueville.   Harvard was taken over by Jews who pushed FSA’s out.  Then they used Harvard to help Russia and cover it up.  Its a total betrayal.  It continues because people are afraid to speak out, in and out of government.  Brenner is from the Antitrust Division of DOJ where the econ profs are and their 50 econ Ph.D.’s.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/russias-plagiarism-files/

Slicer games are run against FSA’s and non-Jewish whites by the Slicer Coalition. Affirmative Action is only one of the Slicer Games.  So is non-white immigration.  So are laws against association by FSA’s and non-Jewish whites to organize. They can’t have their own law firms, companies, organizations, public interest law firms or groups that are organized for their survival.  This is imposed by the Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews.

Ellis Islanders in general, including Italians and Irish Catholics were part of the Slicer Coalition in the 1960’s.  They played a key role in making this happen.  But as the Unz article shows, they have been sliced out of Harvard.  As Ricci shows, Jews are with the Slicer Coalition even when Jews are not benefitting but their Slicer Coalition allies are.

Communism was intended to be a slicer coalition of Jews and the white working class and whatever non native elements were available.  In Russia, that was the Georgians Stalin and Beria among others.  In Russia, the white working class were fooled, and helped cut off their genetic head.  In America, the elite whites have been fooled to cut off their own head at Harvard. FSA Protestants are a minority on the Supreme Court.

Italians and Irish Catholics are in the process of exiting the Slicer Coalition, and are now among its intended victims.  But many still are in it, such as Rudi Giuliani.   It is possible that non-elite Jews may also leave, and some have left.  But the vote for Obama of approximately 80 percent of Jews in 2008 shows most Jews are firmly part of the Slicer Coalition against non-Jewish whites.

Non-Jewish whites need to wake up to what is being done to them.  They are living in the Ellis Island Camp of the Saints.  The Statue of Liberty is the Statue of Their Lost Liberty.  The Slicer Coalition led by Jews has imposed hate speech laws on whites not to speak up for their own survival.

Immigration, Affirmative Action Slicing Game, welfare, socialism, PC laws, uncivil rights laws and other slicer games set up by Jews initially or which they now run as the lead legal counsel of the Slicer Coalition from inside the establishment are now genociding whites.  These processes make zero a fixed point for whites.

White Consciousness is also iterating towards the fixed point of realizing this is being done to them by the Ellis Island Camp of the Saints Slicer Coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews.  That Coalition is full of malice towards non Jewish whites.  We can see that because they are ethnically cleansing them.  Not just from Harvard, but New York and Boston.  Not just there but California.  Not just there but everywhere.

White Consciousness is iterating towards the fixed point of realizing that the Slicer Coalition is full of lies about whites.  That the Slicer Coalition hate whites and spew out hatred of them from the schools and courts and law firms they dominate.  The Slicier Coalition is a genocide coalition.  It is doing the full court press of genocide.

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

This is what the Slicer Coalition is doing to non-Jewish whites.  Whites are in a state of extreme fear.  This is why they don’t speak out.

Let’s go back to Joel Brenner’s remarks about Russia.  He is head of Counter Intelligence and from the Antitrust Division of the DOJ.  So why is it he gives this speech but there are no arrests?  Doesn’t the FBI see the same intelligence he does?  How can they know of this unprecedented level of activity by Russia in the US but not know of any single instance of it?  Despite the NSA and all we have heard about phone companies tapping all calls through certain nodes.  Or do they know who?

Who Whom?  Lenin’s questions.  How can Russia have this activity level in the US that Brenner speaks out about but there are no arrests?  It must be that those involved are too powerful.  Which comes back to what did Russia get in the last 20 years from the US?  Brenner said it wasn’t technology or defense secrets.  That leaves the IMF loans.  That is the econ profs.  That is DOJ Antitrust Division in part where Brenner comes from.  That is US v. Harvard, Shleifer and Hay.

That leads to Larry Summers, Elena Kagan and likely Cass Sunstein and Carl Shapiro. That leads to Barrack Hussein Obama whose central career was at University of Chicago Law School and president of Harvard Law Review.  His wife got paid over 300k a year from University of Chicago while all this was going on.  He took his money then.  Michelle was expensive.  But so is the Slicer Coalition.

The Slicers have their demands and those are another few percentage points each year of admission to Harvard until we are zero.  Its not just Harvard, its fire stations or any government or big business employment.  That is what is happening.  How can whites not understand zero?  That is why the fixed point of White Consciousness is to realize that we are being exterminated deliberately, that it is malice, and that the Slicer Coalition is the one doing it to us.

The Statue of Liberty symbolizes the Lost Liberty of Founding Stock Americans.  Their Harvard and their country have been taken from them by the Camp of Saints Ellis Island Slicer Coalition.  That Coalition won’t stop until whites are zero.  This is because they know that White Consciousness is headed towards a fixed point of realizing what has been done and deciding to undo it completely.

The Slicer Coalition wants whites to reach zero before whites can react effectively and reverse what has happened.  For the Slicer Coalition, this a fight to the extinction of all whites.  Whites have to wake up and realize that.  The Slicer Coalition is the one that is racist. The Slicer Coalition is the one full of malice as its name indicates.  They are slicing whites to zero. Whites are waking up to that and must act.  Slicers won’t stop until whites are zero.  They have made that clear.

Ron Unz wrote in 1998 in the WSJ in the MSM.  But the slicing game continued.  That shows its a plan.  That shows its intended malice by the Slicers, all of them. The last 10 years shows they won’t stop.  Whites have to realize its up to them to save themselves.  They must organize and act.

The Slicer Coalition is waging war on whites from inside the government, Harvard, and the establishment.  This is in violation of the US Constitution.  The US Constitution was not set up by Founding Stock Americans so that Camp of the Saints Ellis Islanders could genocide FSA’s.  But that is what the Slicer Coalition is doing.

There must be total separation.  The Slicer Coalition is genetically programmed to slice whites.  They can’t be fair to whites in positions of power because their genes make them genocide whites.   The Slicer Coalition as it exists today has to be taken as a group that genetically hates whites and can’t act differently.  They can’t not genocide whites when they have that power at Harvard, the federal courts, etc.

This means there must be a separation between the Slicer Coalition and whites.  They must each be in separate countries.    The Slicier Coalition won’t let whites live in peace in separate countries if they can.  Thus to cut America in pieces will just mean more encroachment by the Slicers.   Its not a matter of more white flight from them.

FSA’s were ethnically cleansed from Boston and New York City.  The ethnicity maps show that.  FSA’s can’t play another round of this.  We have to reclaim the cities and universities we built.   We built them and they must be ours.  They must remain ours and must be dominated by us and be for us.  Otherwise, they are against us.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/statute-of-warfare/

The above is hypotheses, specuation or commentary.  This is draft and preliminary.  Comments and corrections welcome.

1831 when all America was All American

March 4, 2009

Vanishing American

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2009/03/democracy-and-demopathy.html

Our present system is not ‘ours’, and does not represent us or our interests. It is not only not responsive to our will as it pretends to be, and it is in fact downright hostile to our interests. It is a system which works to thwart the popular will, and which is inimical to the survival of the legitimate people of this country, the established American people. As such, according to our Founding Fathers, it is no longer a legitimate government.

Robert Reis in a comment there also uses the wonderful word pathocracy to describe our condition.

VA links to Henry George writing in 1883

http://www.schalkenbach.org/library/george.henry/sp02.html

Jorg Banner:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/03/american-dream-vs-demopathy.html

Comment at VA

Great post VA.  This is one I would call Vanishing American Classic (VAC).  It vacs up the facts and gives you the explanation.  When people want to know what happened, how we turned it around despite what seemed impossible odds, they will read this and other posts to find out.

In the fall of empires and civilizations, I think one cause is the destruction of the middle class genes of the native stock.  These are the people who manage the society in the middle.  When you eliminate their genes, and those jobs are done by people of non-native stock, the native stock group is already dead.

Its cutting off the genetic head of the native stock.  This is what Stanford is doing.

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Race/Ethnicity
African American    676     (10%)
American Indian or Alaska Native    187     (3%)
Asian American or Pacific Islander  1,563   (23%)
White   2,628   (38%)
International   462     (7%)
Mexican American    495     (7%)
Other Hispanic  334     (5%)
Unidentified    467     (7%)

If you can do this to all middle class niches in the society, then you kill the native stock genes and the country of the original native stock is dead.

Cut off the genetic head,
and the native stock is dead.

Obama is targeting white middle class.  This is the Ayers Alinsky Trotsky plan.  It likely is the real cause of the fall of the great civilizations of history from before Greece and Rome to the present.  We see it now in England, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain to name a few of its victims.

The critical period was 1831 to 1880’s when  America died.   It was mostly done by 1865.    Immigration, the Civil War, and the unrepatriated blacks killed the original America.  The Civil War was also the triumph of the tyrants and demopathy and pathocracy in America.

Henry George in 1883 as quoted by Vanishing American:

It behooves us to look facts in the face. The experiment of popular government in the United States is clearly a failure. Not that it is a failure everywhere and in everything. An experiment of this kind does not have to be fully worked out to be proved a failure. But speaking generally of the whole country, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from the Lakes to the Gulf, our government by the people has in large degree become, is in larger degree becoming, government by the strong and unscrupulous.”

The America de Toqueville witnessed in 1831 was the last time when all America was All American.  Note that the usurpers and dispossessors always say the opposite.  They say America was never America until they were in power.  That is their constant refrain.

But in fact the usurpers killed it, and they did it between 1831 when de Tocqueville came and saw the native stock American’s America and 1883 when Henry George wrote of the already multiculti multiethny America.  That America had already switched from small town values that VA talks about in her essay to the take over of entire cities by gangs that George talks of and by 1983 had become the destruction of entire cities or great portions of them such as befell Detroit, the South Side of Chicago, much of LA, Atlanta and so forth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville#Democracy_in_America
The Ellis Island Wave resented the original and real America for taking them in and strove to eliminate its genetic head.  Their humor and comments show that today.  Kill its genetic head and the native stock is dead.  That is their animating impulse.  Their leaders constantly say that, no matter their success or prizes.  No matter the issue or provocation.  When Muslims kill all, the Ellis Islanders come out and say the real enemy are the native stock who they equate with bigots, racists and the KKK.  In fact, the attacks of Muslims, Hispanics and the constant killing by blacks spur them on to say that they resent the native stock and their parents and grand-parents taught them that.

Their enmity is so great they celebrate the final ethnic cleansing of the native stock from any position of power or influence even at the price of their own group’s demise from the new immigrants.  This is hate.  This is all consuming destructive hate.  But it pours out every day on MSM.  Its the one true message.

==

When America is attacked, New York City is the beachhead of the assault, except when it comes across the Pacific from China or another Asian power.  Those are often sneak attacks.

New York has loudly proclaimed its hostility to America from the 19th century to the present.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tammany_Hall

On 9/11, New York MSM couldn’t wait to tell the rest of the country that we were the real bigots and racists, not the 19 immigrants.  They made it clear then and since that their real enemy was the native American stock, same as ever.  Every attack since has been the chance for them to reaffirm their true loyalty to the enterprise of removing the native stock from every crack and denying them any place of their own, no matter how far removed from the seats of power.

Their leaders in all walks of life constantly pour out that refrain.  It is the simple truth, that’s why they resent it so much when we say it.  That’s when they erupt into real hate speech.  Hate speech directed at us, their real enemy.

Reverting to Liberalism: IPDE Car Nativism and Hate

September 18, 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate

Wiki on hate:

Hatred is an emotion of intense revulsion, distaste, enmity, or antipathy for a person or thing, generally attributed to a desire to avoid, restrict, remove, or destroy the hated object. Hate can be based on fear of an object or past or present negative consequences of dealing with the hated thing. People may feel conflicting and complicated emotions or thoughts involving hate, as in a love-hate relationship. Hate of someone or something is usually brought on by an extensive period of aggravation from the hating subject. This said, hate can just as easily be a case of “hate at first sight”[citation needed], just as in the term “love at first sight[citation needed] although the analogous English term is an “instant dislike” (hatred (of persons) is not considered polite in the English speaking countries).

According to evolutionary psychologists, hate is a reaction to people whose interests consistently conflict with one’s own. People whose behavior threatens one’s own survival interests are to be hated, while people whose behavior enhances one’s survival prospects are to be liked or even loved (as in the case of offspring and other genetic kin).[citation needed]

The passions of hate arise from several features of our thinking process. These include a desire to strengthen our community and to alleviate our fear. The ability to quickly separate friend from foe is essential to self-defense and safety and provides the origins of hate.[1]

We will take Wiki as the authoritative guide to liberalism, except when overridden by specific statements of the Southern Poverty Law Center (aka Southern Poverty Love Center).

We can summarize this as hate is what links perceived threats to survival to action to avoid, mitigate or remove the threat. Emotion is what links perception to action. When the action is done to survive the emotion is, by definition, hate. Hate is the emotion that links any perceived threat to the action to avoid the threat.

==IPDE

Identify Predict Decide Execute

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=IPDE&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw

== No article on IPDE on Wiki

As of this date, there is no article on Wikipedia on the IPDE method.

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=IPDE+site%3Awikipedia.org&btnG=Search

Results 11 of 1 from wikipedia.org for IPDE. (0.07 seconds)
Diplôme national de l’enseignement supérieur français – Wikipédia
– [ Translate this page ]Diplôme d’Etat d’infirmier; Diplôme d’Etat d’infirmier de bloc opératoire (IBODE); Diplôme d’Etat de puéricultrice (IPDE); Diplôme d’Etat d’infirmier
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplôme_national_de_l’enseignement_supérieur_français – 33k –
==

Without a Wiki article we shall have to struggle on as best we can with IPDE.

==


==Application

You are driving in your car towards an intersection and you have green. A large truck is coming from the perpendicular road and isn’t stopping. You use what we learned in high school IPDE

Identify

Predict

Decide

Execute

You Identify the truck as a theat.

You Predict the truck is going to go through the red light and occupy the intersection at the same time as you.

You Decide to hit the breaks.

You Execute by hitting the breaks.

Outcome: you and the truck driver, and the truck itself survive.

How does a liberal analyze this situation:

You saw the truck was going to be in the intersection and cause you harm and threaten your survival. You then formed the emotion of hate towards the truck, because it threatened your survival. The only thing that could make you survive was hitting the breaks. Emotion in liberalism is what links your brain identifying and predicting a threat to your survival to the action that avoids the threat to survival.

The IP part of IPDE is xenophobia in liberalism. The D part is hate. The E part is a hate crime.

However, liberalism doesn’t stop there. You didn’t just hate that particular truck. You acted out of a general pervasive fear of trucks. This is anti-truck car nativism. Slowing down to avoid the truck was car nativism. This is a persistent attitude of hate. How do we know this? Because you used IPDE to avoid the truck it showed it was something you would do in the same situation again. That shows its a pervasive and persistent pattern of behavior.

What is the solution under liberalism? If a police officer sees you slow down to avoid a collision with a truck when you have the right away, the police officer should arrest you, not the truck driver. You are the one who has shown hate and also engaged in a hate crime by hitting the break and avoiding the accident. At a minimum you have to be given sensitivity training so that you will avoid doing this in the future.

Thus in high school the government paid money to teach you IPDE, now it has to pay money to teach you not to hate trucks and not be a car nativist.

==

The D, deciding, is what happens between identifying and predicting and execution. Once D is done, we slam on the brakes. We act. We stop deciding, we start doing. Emotion is what makes us move. What happens when we are deciding is emotion. We are linking identification and prediction to action. That stage is where are emotions are engaged. This is the stage liberalism wants to stop by calling it hate.

== Second Example

You are out on the road and it starts raining. You increase your following distance from vehicles in front of you.

You have identified the problem, rain during driving. You predict this may present a problem to stop if a threat arises. You decide to slow down. You execute the decision.

Under liberalism, you formed a hate towards rain on roads. You had a nativist reaction to rain being on your road. You recognized this rain invasion was a threat to your survival. The emotion of hate is what connects your identifying a threat to your reaction. You reacted with hate by slowing down, i.e. easing up on the gas. Thus easing up on the gas is a hate crime.

This is not an ordinary hate crime situation. The reason you eased up on the gas during the rain was not just that you hated rain immigrating onto your road space. You hated the rain because it would interfere with your reacting with hate to some additional threat to your survival. The reason you slowed down was not that there was an immediate threat to your survival, but because the rain would interfere with your reaction to the rain if a threat to your survival should arise during the period of rain invasion.

Thus your motive to slow down during the rain was preparation to commit a hate crime if some other object of your animus should present itself, such as a truck coming through a red light towards where you would be if you didn’t slow down.

A hate crime is the E part of the IPDE. The action that ensures your survival is the hate crime.

==Identifying the root cause: IPDE training in high school.

What caused this is government teaching the IPDE method in high school. This is government teaching hate, the D part of IPDE, and teaching that hate crime, the E part, is good as a reaction to a perceived threat to survival, the IP part.

==Predicting the outcome:

We can predict the outcome of IPDE training, people will survive. (Liberalism has also identified the survival of Western people as the highest form of hate. So IPDE will keep Western people alive, since they have more roads and cars per capita.)

IPDE involves multiple other hates. These include car nativism and dryness nativism (a reaction of slowing down during water immigration on roads while driving.) IPDE breeds hate.

If we teach Western people not to implement survival actions to threats they perceive, then we can stop hate and hate crimes. Hate is whatever emotion links perceived threats to action.

If we stop teaching IPDE in the schools, then government as the source of hate and hate crimes can be removed. The white establishment created IPDE back when they had power and imposed it on all the schools before liberalism had sufficient control to stop it.

== Decide

IPDE has to be stopped because it causes haters to survive. IPDE is government mandated hate and nativism for the survival of Western people.

== Execute

We execute the decision and stop teaching IPDE in schools.

This is the triumph of liberalism. An exercise in double think. We have identified the threat of hate, the emotion that links perceived threats to survival to action to avoid those threats. We then predict that if we stop teaching IPDE we will stop teaching hate to the young who are so impressionable. We decide to implement the action of stopping the teaching of IPDE. We then execute the action, and stop the teaching of hate in the schools.

==References

This article arose from reading Vanishing American, Lawrence Auster, Katie’s Dad, our good friends at SPLC, and others.

Katie’s Dad

http://americankernel.com/2007/09/cant-handle-the-truth-dont-read-this/

Vanishing American

“Outlawing emotions”

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/09/outlawing-emotions.html

“Refinding Passion”

http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/09/refinding-passion.html

The latter two pieces are VA channelling the same underlying spirit of survival of the West that Oriana Fallaci was in tune with. VA is the American OF.

We should not disarm ourselves from humor, a process in which all liberals subject all conservatives to a state of fear. (This is a paraphrase from a Firing Line debate back in the cave days before William F. Buckley reverted to liberalism. Search henpecking “state of fear”.)

When we do humor, its hate according to liberalism. Don’t forget that. Liberals won’t let you if you do. Humor is what helps teach us how to survive. It imparts lessons we should not forget. That is, humor helps you remember IPDE. That is why humor is hate under liberalism.

Humor can help us detect the hate in others. The Danish Cartoons showed us the hate in Islam. This was before the Muslim reaction. The Muslims reacted because they knew that Islam is hate and that the Danish Cartoons were showing the hate in Islam and the hate in Muhammad.

The Muslims know they do want to invade us and take us over and then get rid of us. That is their intention and they are doing it by immigration. They reacted to the Cartoons for teaching that lesson with humor that anyone in the West could understand.

The MSM wouldn’t show the Danish Cartoons out of fear. The biggest fear was not of Muslims, but that the Cartoons would show people that Islam is hate and that Islam attacked us. The Cartoons came out in 2006. The MSM had lied about Islam and Muslims from 2001 to 2006. The MSM was afraid in 2006, but more than being afraid of Muslims, they were afraid of being exposed as having lied about Islam. That is their business franchise.

Steve Sailer, a heresiarch of forbidden IPDE, has insights on humor teaching us truth here:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/01/18/why-ethnic-humor-is-funny/

==Liberal IPDE Reductionism.

I: Anything in Western society that is a transformation of IPDE is hate. Western civilization is rooted in the people who created it and sustain it.

P: If we stop anything that is IPDE in Western civilization, i.e. promotes the survival of the people and the civilization, then Western civilization and the people will die.

D: Linking perception to action is the D step. We have to decide to stop all IPDE in Western civilization so as to end Western civilization and the underlying people.

E: Execute Western Civilization by eliminating all IPDE from its schools, churches, factories, legislatures, laws, police, customs, border enforcement, government handout agencies GHA’s, non-government hand out organizations, NGHO’s, etc.

This is the triumphant of liberalism, a process by which all liberals keep IPDE tendencies in the West under control by keeping the people in the West in a state of fear.

This is IPDE in a nutshell. Identify IPDE as a way for Western peoples and civilization to survive. Predict if we use fear tactics we can stop it and redefine it as hate. Decide to end Western civilization by ending the people. Execute the plan by subjecting Western people to a state of fear when they act to survive.

== The Reversion to Liberalism Method

Liberals like SPLC subject conservatives to a state of fear so as to promote reversion to liberalism in a survival situation.

Liberals want us when we IP, identify a threat and predict the action needed to save us, to instead of deciding to do it, to label that decision as hate. They want to make us identify threats as friends, but they use fear as an additional safety mechanism to prevent our implementing our survival. So when we identify a threat and predict what action is needed to avoid the threat, they label the D part as hate. This is the genius of liberalism. Not only does it deny what is really a threat in the first place, but even when we perceive the threat, and decide on the action to avoid it, liberalism teaches us that its hate to link this identification and prediction to the action that will save us.

This includes saving us as individuals, as a group, as a people and as a civilization. Liberalism has taught us that even when we see the threat and predict the needed action, that the emotion that links the perception to the action is hate, and therefore we can’t do it.

==Vanishing American, Katie’s Dad, Lawrence Auster, Steve Sailer

The articles of Vanishing American referenced above, or of Katie’s Dad, or many by Lawrence Auster or others all involve the same issues as raised above. We can search on hate on Auster:

hate site:amnation.com

For Steve Sailer

hate site:isteve.com

==Revert to liberalism in stress situations

Once liberalism can get us to define hate as the emotion that links a perceived threat and the action needed to avoid it as the decision to implement that action, then they have stopped us from using the IPDE method to survive. They label the E as a hate crime to reinforce it. Liberals try to make us identify, i.e. misidentify, threats as not threats. But when the chips are down they want us to be frozen in fear when we want to link our actions to our perceptions and predictions. They label the D step in our survival as individuals, a people or civilization as hate.

Any emotion that links the perception of a threat to Western civilization or Western people to action to avoid the threat is hate. It is Western hate. Emotion is what makes you move. Its what links perception and prediction to action. If its for the West to survive, that emotion is hate under liberalism.

Thus in moments of stress, liberals have taught us to identify our emotion to link perceptions and predictions to action to survive as being hate. As we go through an IPDE process, liberalism is a meta IPDE process going on in the background. When we get to the D step in the primary IPDE process, liberalism cuts in and makes us identify the D in the primary process as being hate, because it is an emotion that links the IP in the primary IPDE to the E in the primary IPDE.

== Meta IPDE Liberalism

We will call an IPDE reaction such as in driving a primary IPDE. Its something you do because its trained or instinctive. We shall call the observation of such an IPDE and the applying of an IPDE method to a primary IPDE a meta IPDE.

Liberalism is a secondary or meta IPDE running in background. When a primary IPDE starts up, and we Identify a threat, Predict the action to avoid it and are about to Decide to execute it, then liberalism’s meta IPDE cuts in. We meta-identify that we are employing an IPDE routine in our brains. We meta-predict this will cause us to act to survive. We meta-identify that the primary process Decision step is the emotion of hate (what links a primary ID set to action in liberalism), and we then stop the primary IPDE program from executing.

The liberalism meta-IPDE identifies a primary IPDE. It identifies its in operation. It predicts it will cause us to survive. It also predicts that if it calls the D step in the primary IPDE hate, then it can stop us from linking our Identification and Prediction to action. The meta program actually works. We actually shut down our primary IPDE process and don’t stop the threat to us.

This is how immigration is maintained. Liberalism has set up the meta IPDE in our brains to run constantly and to identify the D step in a primary IPDE as hate. Anything that links our Identification of a threat and Prediction of the needed action to stop it is labeled as hate by the liberal meta-IPDE. This is why we didn’t stop immigration after 9-11.

Bush identified his reaction after 9-11 as hate. So he shut off the obvious action, stopping immigration. The meta IPDE cut in. The Red Crescent Memorial is the same thing. Its deliberately praising what attacked us because we recognize Islam as the threat in the 9-11 case.

Praising Mexicans as having family values compared to us is another example of this Red Crescent Syndrome. We make memorials to what is destroying us and praise what is destroying us. This is the Meta IPDE of liberalism.

==The solution.

We need to apply IPDE to the liberalism metaIPDE . This is meta meta IPDE. or meta squared IPDE.

We identify the liberal meta IPDE as defining the D step in our implementing IPDE to save ourselves.

We predict if we continue to define as hate the emotion that links our actions to implement the IP steps as hate, then we won’t survive.

We decide not to label the D step as hate.

We execute our plan by stop labeling as hate the emotions that link our identification of threats and predictions of how to stop them to the action of stopping them.

== Action.

We reinforce the meta meta IPDE by applying it. We call our Senator and ask them politely to vote against the Dream Act, increases in H-1B, Ag Jobs, H-2B, and to join Tom Tancredo in a moratorium on immigration.

Fax Congress Free:

http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter

https://secure2.convio.net/fair/site/Advocacy?alertId=199&pg=makeACall

http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer
Keep informed on the Dream Act

http://www.steinreport.com/archives/010771.html

== Paralysis by fear is not a strategy for survival.

Liberalism’s Meta IPDE program will kill us unless we identify it and act to stop it. Liberalism makes us identify the emotion that links our action to survive to our perception of the threat and our prediction of what action will save us. We have to identify the liberalism IPDE as a threat. We need to predict if we do nothing we will not survive. We must decide to stop the Liberalism IPDE. We must execute our plan.

Living in fear of speaking out is not a plan for survival. Not calling your senator’s office to ask them to vote against the Dream Act this week is not a plan for survival. Being afraid for your job is not a plan for survival. We have to identify the fear that the liberalism IPDE subjects us to. We have to identify that they have said that the emotion that links the IP to the E is hate. We have to predict that if we don’t say, no it is not, then we will not survive. We must Execute our plan and say its not hate for us to stop all immigration or welfare or affirmative action or anchor baby or ER mandates or the other things that threaten us.

Being afraid for our jobs is not a plan for our survival. Being afraid to speak out against the fear tactics of SPLC, ACLU, Harvard, the NEA, the school board and others is not a plan for survival. It takes risk taking to survive. Let us remember, as VA so often reminds us, this is the “land where our fathers died”. This is the land of the “Pilgrim’s Pride”.

Pilgrims were not wimps. Being a Pilgrim was not going on a picnic. It meant not just dying sometimes, but fighting sometimes. You didn’t come here if you didn’t want to fight. Coming to America was an act of courage not of fear. It may have come from fear, but the act to come here itself was an act of courage.

We must reinvoke the spirit of 1776. We must recognize that the Statue of Liberty was given to us by France, not to say we were a welfare agency, but something for people in France who stayed in France to admire and emulate. The Statute of Liberty was for the people who stayed in France, not the ones who came here. It was to inspire those who stayed in France to make France an America.

We need to make America what the Pilgrim’s Pride made of it. We need to identify the threat to our survival, predict what is needed to stop it, end all immigration, decide on this plan and execute it. We need to understand the Statute of Liberty was not to make us feel afraid but proud. The Statue of Liberty was a gift for what we had done, not for future welfare benefits.

The Statue of Liberty was a monument to the people who created America. The Statue of Liberty was given to recognize achievements already done, i.e. those that happened before the statute was gifted. It was gifted to those who had already done something and for actions already completed in the past, the creation of America. Now its time to stop that America from disappearing in a wind of immigration.

Liberalism is about reinterpreting history in violation of science. Causality says the cause happens before the effect. The Statute of Liberty was gifted by France to America in recognition of 1776 and France’s aid in helping the founders create America. The Statue of Liberty was a gift by one ally of the fight in 1776 to another ally in the fight of 1776. It was a gift to cement the alliance of 1776.

The Statue of Liberty has been misappropriated by liberalism to stand for immigration. This is a process not limited to the Statue of Liberty. Its everything in our society, down to our shoes made in China. We are supposed to be afraid of telling the truth because it will offend someone. At what point do lies offend someone?

The fear of offense is part of the liberalism meta IPDE. We are supposed to be afraid of insulting post 1886 immigrants by saying the Statute of Liberty was a gift by one ally in the war of 1776 to another ally and not at all about the desire of all French people to move to America and get welfare.

The very name of the statue says what it is for, Liberty. That was created in 1776. The French Revolution used Liberty as part of its slogan. That revolution was in 1789. The statute is a commemoration of 1776 and the joint war fought by the French and Americans for American independence.

Those who immigrated after 1886 might want to consider what will happen in the reinterpretation game to their lives and monuments. What about those who fought in WWII? Do they want the WWII monument dug up and moved because Mexico didn’t fight in WWII and it causes distress to Mexicans to see a monument to a war that Mexico sat out of?

Those who came after 1886 may want to think about the WWII monument as their memorial, because it was set up after they participated in doing something for this country. It is more honest to take pride in the monuments put up after a contribution than to take the monuments set up for the work of others and claim they are about those taking them. That is real pride.

Saying a monument for achievement in 1776 is really a tribute to people who came after 1886 is not real pride. But Leftism says no monument has intrinsic meaning, only the meaning that Leftism gives it at the time. This is fundamental to Leftism as Orwell pointed out. The Statue of Liberty now symbolizes the opposite of its original intention. It originally stood for truth as part of liberty. Now it stands, under liberalism, for meaning whatever liberalism says it means.

That is the opposite of 1776, which was about the right to say the truth even if unpopular with the establishment. The Spirit of 1776 is not about falsely claiming the monuments to the achievements of others as about us. Its about the right to say the truth and take back the truth when its stolen.

Should the WWII monument be taken down because it symbolizes the unity of pre 1886 European immigrants and post 1886 European immigrants? This memorial of European unity is offensive to Mexicans so it has to be taken down? That is the logic of liberalism. Don’t expect truth to be sugar coated like the false interpretation of the Statue of Liberty as a monument to those who came after it was built instead of to those who died before it was built.

Truth offends. Truth is offensive. The achievement of one person is not the achievement of another. The recognition of one person’s achievement or groups is a denial that another person did it. When one person wins the Nobel Prize, it means, most of the time, they made that discovery and not someone else. This applies to modern Western civilization as well. It is the creation of the West, and not the third world. Its specifically not the creation of Mexico or Islam.

The Spirit of 1776 is about the right to say truth that offends. It is offensive to some liberals to say Islam and Mexico didn’t make Western Civilization. They would say, then Western Civilization is wrong, if they had to admit that. The Red Crescent of Embrace Memorial is about saying the West was wrong on 9-11. Right in front of the Statue of Liberty, Islam attacked America.

That may shock liberals to say that. But liberals have conditioned us all to be shocked by it being said. That is how they control us. They use this to divide us. When one of us says the truth, the others recoil in fear. We react in fear when one of our fellows says a truth forbidden to us. This is why liberals hate humor, because humor makes our fellows willing to listen to truth about the pharisees in power.

Well the spirit of 1776 is exactly about saying that. In 1776, as now, speaking up against the government and the English King was dangerous. Those who did it were considered shocking. That had been going on for years.

When Franklin Graham said Islam was an evil faith, he spoke the truth. We reacted in fear, not to the Muslim attack, but in Graham saying the truth. Graham didn’t say Islam was an evil faith at that time for no reason. He said it because Islam attacked us on 9-11. Just as Communism and Fascism had attacked us, so Islam attacked us. The liberal establishment reacted like pharisees in power always do to the truth, they screamed, shouted, ranted and demanded the head of Franklin Graham. We gave it to them out of fear of their shouting.

That was a victory for liberals. The head of Franklin Graham and the shunning of him by establishment institutions including President Bush was a victory for the pharisee press. At that moment, they took ownership of 9-11 as their act. They became allies with Islam. They had continued Muslim immigration after the WTC 1993 attack.

This is why when Virgil Goode said in 2006 that we should stop Muslim immigration, the MSM attacked him like Graham. They wanted Goode out of the House. They wanted him to take it back. They had lied from 1993 onwards about Muslim immigration.

This is why the leader of the BNP in the UK, Nick Griffin was prosecuted for saying similar things about Islam. Griffin was charged twice and found not guilty by a jury both times. The Labour party under Blair has been trying to restrict the right to jury trials. They have also taken away other parts of what was once considered the unwritten Constitution of Britain.

This is why the MSM wouldn’t show the Danish Cartoons. The pharisees of the press know that cartoons show truth. The pharisees know that the proles will see through them when humor is used. The Danish Cartoons exposed Islam and Muslim immigration, but also the press as liars and traitors. They did it with humor. The press knew that when people saw the cartoons, they would see through the press and Islam and Muslim immigration. That is why the Danish Cartoons were not shown.

The Liberal meta IPDE program is exactly about making people put their hands over their ears when they read Islam attacked America on 9-11. The Liberal meta IPDE is meant to disable us from self-defense. To defend America, we have to say the truth.

Terrorism didn’t attack America on 9-11-2001, Islam did. The West can’t fight what attacked it, until it says what attacked it. Liberalism’s IPDE is about making the West feel that to say who attacked it is hate. Liberalism identifies that if we say Islam attacked us on 9-11, and Arabs and Pakistanis, etc. then that knowledge will help us fight back.

Just as the knowledge coded in humor is forbidden to us, even to say who attacked us and what we are fighting is forbidden to us. The Republican primary candidates and to a lesser extent the Democrat ones are willing in 2007 to say we are in a fight with radical Islam. That has taken 6 years of progress in a constant fight with liberalism.

From Religion of Peace to Radical Islam attacked us has taken 6 years of hard fighting by non-liberals. That has taken saying truth that offends. It also takes humor that offends. The Muhammad Cartoons of 2006 were a key step in awaking the West. When we say the reaction of Muslims to those cartoons, we realized they do hate us. This is a war of Islam against the West.

It took humor to make this clear. 9-11 didn’t do it. Our sanctimonious pious self-righteous liberalism couldn’t identify who attacked us on 9-11. “We have some planes,” they said. We couldn’t identify what attacked us. It took Danish Cartoons to show us what was attacking us. That is the power of humor.

Humor is powerful because it has survival value. Humor teaches truth that powerful pharisees don’t want us to know. Humor is a weapon against the lies of those in power. When the schools, textbooks, MSM all lie about what attacks us, the Danish Cartoons showed it was Islam. It was Muhammad who attacked us in 633 A.D. and it was his religion according to his book that attacked us in 2001 A.D.

Liberals identify humor as a danger to their problem to stop us from responding to what threatens us. They predict if we can tell jokes about Islam and have cartoons in newspapers about Muhammad that we will stop Muslim immigration and take away Pakistan’s nukes and stop Iran from getting nukes. So they take humor away from us.

The liberals are the pious self-righteous pharisees taken to a power. Liberalism is the modern perfection of phariseeism. Liberals are pharisees. Tim Russert’s show, Meet the Press could be renamed Meet the Pharisees.

Liberals intentionally use the methods of a self righteous elite. Like all self-righteous elites they know humor is the truth of the oppressed and the fearful. They hate humor just as they hate anything that lets those under them see through them.

Humor releases the fearful from fear. That leads to action. That leads to survival. That is why liberalism fights humor. Humor is a powerful force that liberalism can’t control. Humor cuts through liberalism saying that any emotion that links perception of a threat to action to stop it is hate. Humor is what the oppressed and fearful use to see the lies of the elites who are trying to end their survival.

Even though they use humor to ridicule Westerners for survival as hicks, liberals know that they can’t allow humor to be legitimate. They have to launch a war on humor just like one on hate. Because humor will expose the liberal war on hate as really just a war on the West and the people of the West. The liberals are allies of those who attacked us on 9-11 as the Red Crescent of Embrace Memorial shows.

==More on France’s motives for Statute of Liberty

France may also have gifted the Statue of Liberty to counteract the impact of immigration, German immigration on America. France fought a war with Germany in 1871, and Germany occupied Paris after a siege. France may have wanted to remind America that it was its ally in 1776, not the Germans. In WWI and WWII America fought with France against Germany despite all the German immigrants in America.

We have to look to France for the motives of why France gave the Statue of Liberty. France had just been overrun by Germany and Germany was setting up an alliance system against France. Germany had a mobilization plan for invading France in time of war. France wanted America to think of the help France gave in 1776 while France was threatened by Germany. So France put up a statute to the aid France gave America in 1776 right where Americans would see it, in New York Harbor.

France’s motive was not to say, look welfare go get it. France’s motive was to address the same people who had been their allies in 1776. They wanted to say in 1886, 15 years after German soldiers occupied Paris, that France was the ally of the people of America. This was addressed not to those seeking welfare, but to those who had fought in 1776.

France was thinking of its own survival. France didn’t want an America of welfare recipients and ER mandates, but the America of 1776 that had the fighting spirit to aid France against Germany. That America did exist and liberated France in World War I and World War II.

France didn’t give us the Statue of Welfare, it gave us the Statue of Liberty. They didn’t want welfare recipients, but free and independent people who really could come to their aid to save them from the German army. France didn’t want to create a right to welfare, but a right to freedom.

France didn’t want welfare, but help in preserving its freedom from Germany. It feared that German immigrants would turn America against France. So it gave us the Statue of Liberty to remind us of the alliance with France that gave us our birth.

France gave us the Statue of Liberty because it needed to preserve freedom after the German army’s invasion and occupation of France in 1871. The Statute of Liberty is also the Statue of Warfare. Because it is only by fighting that we can preserve our freedom. France had been occupied, and knew then that to fight invasion and occupation is as essential to fight for freedom as it is to fight those in power who lie for their own benefit and greed.

If we want to be more charitable perhaps, we would say that Liberty was France’s fight in 1789 and 1776. France was putting up a monument to its contribution to Liberty by helping birth America. This was a fight still going on, since the occupation of Paris in 1871 was not liberty to the French point of view.

Liberalism uses fear to take our symbols like the Statue of Liberty, a symbol to the founders in 1776 and reinterpret it as a symbol to people who came after 1886 the date the statue was built. Memorials and statutes are not put up to people not yet born or arrived. They put up the Washington Monument after he died, not before his ancestors came here. Liberalism is about denying the truths of science, such as cause precedes effect, and making us too afraid of offending someone to point that out.

Its the same with immigration. Its a mathematical theorem in genetics already published that one way immigration causes genetic replacement. Liberalism is about creating the fear to repeat what is published in science journals. This fear is working.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

From PDF, conclusion:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

The MSM and others are afraid to repeat a published theorem. This is fear. This is real. It works. Its not just theory. The idea of using fear to stop people taking the action needed to survive is fundamental to the entire history of leftism.

Truth builds on truth. The post 1886 European immigrants who want a contribution to make could make it by stopping immigration entirely, instead of saying the Statue of Liberty was a monument for them, when it wasn’t.

We can’t be living in fear that we may lose our job because the ACLU or SPLC or the MSM will come after our employer for employing us. We must recognize these fears and act anyhow. This is what Pilgrim’s Pride is. Its recognizing fear that paralyzes us and acting anyhow. Pilgrim’s Pride means using IPDE to survive not to interrupt at the moment we are putting the foot on the break to stop immigration all the way to zero.

==IPDE on immigration.

Identify that immigration will cause our genetic replacement by studying the Wright Island Model and Immigration Vanishing Survival Theorem.
Population Genetics Island Model One Way Migration

One Source Group and Vanishing Survival for rest
Is the West too anti-geek to survive?

Dream Act This week: All illegals under 16 made citizens

Predict we have to have zero immigration to stop this because that is what the theorem says we have to have. Predict you need to call your senator.

Decide to call your senator and to vote for candidates like Tom Tancredo for zero legal immigration.

Execute your decision by calling your senator and voting for Tom Tancredo and other zero legal immigration candidates.

For the members of Congress and the Senate, truth is determined by votes and money. Who has the most votes and money has truth. Their definition is completely in their own interest.

Call and fax your senators and Congressman to stop the Dream Act. Be polite, many staffers are on our side already. Don’t be the call that embarrasses our side. But the ultimate embarrassment is if we don’t have enough calls. The press only care about corporate speaking fees and advertisement. Immigration is supposed to make us so afraid for our jobs that we won’t tell advertisers that supporting programming for immigration doesn’t sell soap. Tell your congressman and senator.

http://www.teamtancredo.com/

http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter

https://secure2.convio.net/fair/site/Advocacy?alertId=199&pg=makeACall

%d bloggers like this: