Archive for the 'Steve Sailer' Category

The Rise of Income Inequality and the Rise of the Jews.

September 9, 2010

Income inequality is U shaped in 20th century. It fell during immigration restriction and rose after it. See graph below:

http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entry/2266026/

Timothy Noah


Over the next two weeks, I’ll try to answer that question by looking at all potential explanations—race, gender, the computer revolution, immigration, trade, government policies, the decline of labor, compensation policies on Wall Street and in executive suites, and education.

And he will claim none of them cause it?

==Steve Sailer at Vdare

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/091025_podhoretz.htm

After all, back in 1987, Jews made up 92 of the Forbes 400 richest people in America, according to Nathaniel Weyl’s 1989 book, The Geography of American Achievement. This month, however, after 22 years in which power at the federal level has been fairly evenly split between the two parties, Jacob Berkman, who covers Jewish philanthropists for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, estimated that in the newly released 2009 Forbes 400:

“At least 139 of the Forbes 400 are Jewish”

That’s an increase of about one-half over 22 years.

Hence, Jews, who comprise about 1/50th of the population, are 1/3rd or more of the Forbes 400. On a per capita basis, Jewish-Americans are roughly 25 times more likely than other Americans to be billionaires.

==

If we look at the percentage of non-Jewish Whites at Harvard it falls from
1965 to the present. Its now under 25 percent roughly. A similar figure applies to Stanford. We could regress income inequality against the percentage of non-Whites including Jews at Harvard or Stanford. Or we could use one over the percentage of non-Jewish Whites. Both of these went up during this period. This may be a regression not seen in economic journals. Wonder who edits them?

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5. However, the numbers come out, its 10 to 25 percent non-Jewish white. That is the Camp of the Saints being done to FSA’s by Jews.

http://www.onenation.org/1198/111698b.html

Some Minorities Are More Minor than Others

Ron K. Unz
Wall Street Journal
Monday, November 16, 1998.

“For example, Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.”

“In fact, it seems likely that non-Jewish white Americans represent no more than a quarter of Harvard undergraduates, even though this group constitutes nearly 75% of the population at large, resulting in a degree of underrepresentation far more severe than that of blacks, Hispanics or any other minority groups.”

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates. Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

Elite Jews have succeeded in ethnically cleansing non-Jewish whites who founded Harvard from Harvard. Elite Jews use their position to enforce immigration that genocides whites. These are combined with Department of Labor rules that give priority to hiring non-whites in every job linked to government contracts.

Internet Applicant Recordkeeping rule

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/faqs/iappfaqs.htm

What is the purpose of the Internet Applicant final rule?

The Internet Applicant final rule, issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), addresses recordkeeping by Federal contractors and subcontractors about the Internet hiring process and the solicitation of race, gender, and ethnicity of “Internet Applicants.” The rule is the product of a lengthy deliberative process, including public input, to develop a definition of “Internet Applicant” applicable in the Internet age (added to 41 CFR 60-1.3). The recordkeeping requirements of the rule (amending 41 CFR 60-1.12) will provide meaningful data that OFCCP will use to enhance its enforcement of the nondiscrimination laws.

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/Presentation/Applicant%20Rule%20Presentation_files/frame.htm

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/aa.htm

Operation of the Executive Order Program. The EEO Clause
Each contracting agency in the Executive Branch of government must include the equal opportunity clause in each of its nonexempt government contracts. The equal opportunity clause requires that the contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic individuals are considered minorities for purposes of the Executive Order.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/steve-sailer/jewish-influence/

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/09/08/129728016/income-more-unequal-in-u-s-than-in-parts-of-latin-america?ft=1&f=1001

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/income-inequality-graph/

Fertility is an inverse U

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://data.princeton.edu/eco572/uspctfr.png&imgrefurl=http://data.princeton.edu/eco572/heuser.html&usg=__gT-EVtEKKf6f9NBg__PDi6Oj6ko=&h=374&w=553&sz=15&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=j0nVBUVkdjZoHM:&tbnh=124&tbnw=183&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfertility%2Bus%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26channel%3Ds%26biw%3D800%26bih%3D393%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=369&vpy=87&dur=403&hovh=124&hovw=183&tx=96&ty=88&ei=XdSITOSlEYWClAem5JS0Dg&oei=XdSITOSlEYWClAem5JS0Dg&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=6&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0

http://www.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=fertility+us&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=800&bih=393

See Patrick Cleburne on Vdare

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2239/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/20/robert-novak-old-atlantic-lighthouse-votes-no/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/latino-revolution/

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-substitution-effect/

Thus the rise of the Jews is linked to factors lowering the income of Whites. Jewish oligarchs push those factors, non-White immigration, Asians replacing Whites in tech jobs, know-how transfer to non-Whites, etc.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/slicer-coalition/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/paul-krugman/

Krugman wrings his hands over rising income inequality, but Princeton and MIT do all they can to increase it by race replacement of Whites in their institutions. Genocide of Whites by immigration has led to income inequality that favors wealth Jewish Oligarchs, Jewgarchs. This is Jewgarchy, rule by Jewish Oligarchs. That is what ruined Russia in the 1990’s after the fall of the Soviet Union. That was funded by Jewarchs Larry Summers (US Treasury) and Stanley Fischer (MIT).

Putin offered Stanley Fischer a job in Russia as a joke:

Stanley Fischer chaired Ben Bailout Bernanke’s Ph.D. thesis at MIT. Jewarch Bernanke bailed out Jewgarchs at Goldman Sachs. Jewarchy, rule by Jews, and Jewgarchy, Rule by Jewish Oligarchs, have been bad for Whites.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/06/04/new-study-on-jewish-genes/

By Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times

Jews of European descent living on opposite sides of the globe are more closely related to one another than they are to their fellow countrymen, according to the largest study ever conducted of what it means genetically to be Jewish. Ashkenazis, the primary group descended from European Jews, are all as closely related as fourth or fifth cousins would be, the study found.

http://www.vdare.com/hoste/100709_immigration_policy.htm

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SlezkineRev.pdf


This reminds me of Jews as an elite in the Soviet Union, where a nascent Jewish elite motivated by moral fervor and hatred unleashed by their exclusion under the Czar morphed easily into a corrupt, nepotistic elite that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of Russia. A report to the Soviet Central Committee reminds me of Kagan’s route to success: “They gather around themselves people of the same nationality, impose the habit of praising one another (while making others erroneously believe that they are indispensable), and force their protégés through to high posts” (see here, p. 78). Another report, from 1942, noted that elite cultural institutions “turned out to be filled by non-Russian people (mainly by Jews)” (see here , p. 51, ff). For example, of the ten top executives of the Bolshoi Theater—the most prestigious Soviet cultural institution—there were eight Jews and one Russian. Similar disproportions were reported in prestigious musical conservatories, the Soviet Academy of Science Institute of Literature, and among art and music reviewers in elite publications. Ethnic nepotism, not IQ, is the only way to explain these disproportions.

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SAIDchap2.pdf

http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/28/magazine/inside-the-meritocracy-machine.html?pagewanted=7

http://mondoweiss.net/2010/01/the-meritocracy-and-jewish-kinship-networks.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/opinion/12brooks.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=opinion&adxnnlx=1284037262-MNc9RRjWf2HhJl17PnyCYw

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/opinion/19douthat.html

The Roots of White Anxiety
By ROSS DOUTHAT
Published: July 18, 2010

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/ross-douthat-on-roots-of-white-anxiety.html

http://mangans.blogspot.com/2010/07/anti-white-racism-of-hostile-elite.html

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/06/jewish-intellectuals-endorse-kevin.html

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

http://www.americanbuddhist.net/roots-white-anxiety

“Kevin MacDonald: Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities explained”

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

One might simply suppose that this is due to higher Jewish IQ. However, on the basis of Richard Lynn’s estimates of Ashkenazi Jewish IQ and correcting for the greater numbers of European Whites, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews should be around 7 to 1 (IQ >130) or 4.5 to 1 (IQ > 145). Instead, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews is around 1 to 1 or less. (See here.)

So there must be some other reason besides IQ that Jews are such a large percentage of the population classified as White at elite universities.

Espenshade and Radford show that there is discrimination against poor Whites and against non-urban Whites—exactly the population groups that are least likely to be Jewish.

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

“A comment on Paul Gottfried’s review of Cultural Insurrections”

Kevin MacDonald

April 18, 2009

==

The extent to which we live under Jewarchy (rule by Jews like Bernanke, Summers, Stanley Fischer, Norbert Schlei, etc. ) and Jewgarchy (Mayor Bloomberg, Schumer, Arlen Specter, ) and who manifest their dislike of us ( “comedians” attacking Sarah Palin over and over), we have to be free to talk about it and analyze it. This means in writing and build on the work of others, Steve Sailer, Kevin MacDonald, Vdare, Alternative Right, Occidental Dissent, Occidental Quarterly, etc.

For Whites in America, to an ever rising extent, Jews are our oppressors. Because of this we have the right to talk about it. Because of this we have the right to decide if we want separation from those who oppress us. This is the same as in Russia. Jewgarchs like Bloomberg openly side with Muslims against us. This is the same as Spain.

We have the right to separate from a separate nation, The Jewish People, who do not identify with us and who advocate policies reducing us to poverty and ultimately dispossession and extinction. Jews are related to each other more than any European population they live in.

Their close genetic kinship shows that Jews are not White and are a separate people, one that shows its antipathy and disdain with Whites. They show that in their constant attacks on Sarah Palin. They show that in their attacks on Vigil Goode. They funded his being defeated.

They show their antipathy to Whites as a separate people they disdain in their attacks on Whites in the debate on what has become their Ground Zero Mosque. To the Jewarchy, the Ground Zero Mosque is a symbol comparable to Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty of their dispossession of Founding Stock Americans and their rise to mastery in America. In fact, the Ground Zero Mosque now joins Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty as the Jewish Trinity of Symbols of the Dispossession of Founding Stock Americans in particular and Whites in general.

The Bailout was the action of an insider network. The bailout proved that financial services is not a competitive market but an insider network. The insider network spans Wall Street, academia, the Council of Economic Advisers, the Federal Reserve, US Treasury and the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. Econ profs circulate between these as well as IMF and World Bank and other stations such as major media.

This insider network is an antitrust violation. What we saw in the bailout was a massive antitrust violation. This is an insiders network not a competitive market. The Jewish ethno-network of Jewish mandarins and oligarchs, The Elite Jewish Nation, is the glue that binds this network together across academia, Wall Street and government.

The elite Jewish ethno-network staffs these nodes and their people circulate from node to node in their careers. Wall Street builds the nice buildings for econ departments and B-schools that house the econ profs who run the Antitrust Division, Federal Reserve, US Treasury, Council of Economic Advisers, and other spots as well. The Law and Economics movement cements in the law schools and the courts with this network.

Advertisements

Re “The Atlantic 50:” Pundit Demographics by Steve Sailer

September 25, 2009

“The Atlantic 50:” Pundit Demographics [Steve Sailer]

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/09/24/the-atlantic-50-pundit-demographics/

Steve Sailer analyzes the demographics of the list of most 50 pundits compiled by the Atlantic.

==Excerpt

Jews make up about 50% of the Atlantic 50 versus 3% of the population, which means people of Jewish background are a little more than 30 times more likely to be in the Atlantic 50 as the average American.

The Jewish figure may go down a little as I hear about more individuals with Jewish surnames who are actually half-Jewish. And there are all the questions about what to do with adoptees, cuckoos’ eggs, converts, and so forth.

This strong Jewish representation among the influential isn’t new. In the 1995 book Jews and the New American Scene,
, the prominent social scientist Seymour Martin Lipset, a Senior Scholar of the Wilstein Institute for Jewish Policy Studies, and Earl Raab, Director of the Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at Brandeis University, pointed out:

“During the last three decades, Jews have made up 50% of the top two hundred intellectuals, 40 percent of American Nobel Prize Winners in science and economics, 20 percent of professors at the leading universities, 21 percent of high level civil servants, 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington, 26% of the reporters, editors, and executives of the major print and broadcast media, 59 percent of the directors, writers, and producers of the fifty top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series.” [pp 26-27]

==End Excerpt

Looking at the list none that I see have advocated stopping immigration or even opposing amnesty.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Thus this group of elite Jews is advocating genocide of non-Jewish whites.

http://www.stanford.edu/about/facts/undergraduate.html

Ethnic Diversity
African American 10.5%
Asian American 19.8%
International 7.2%
Mexican American 7.9%
Native American 3.2%
Native Hawaiian 0.8%
Other Hispanic 6.7%
White 31.5%
Other 3.1%
Declined to State 9.5%

Subtract out 20 percent Jewish from White 31.5 and you get non Jewish white 11.5.  However, the numbers come out, its 10 to 25 percent non-Jewish white.  That is the Camp of the Saints being done to FSA’s by Jews.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/pbs-the-extraordinary-journey-celebrates-ethnic-cleansing/

http://www.onenation.org/1198/111698b.html

Some Minorities Are More Minor than Others

Ron K. Unz
Wall Street Journal
Monday, November 16, 1998.

“For example, Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.”

“In fact, it seems likely that non-Jewish white Americans represent no more than a quarter of Harvard undergraduates, even though this group constitutes nearly 75% of the population at large, resulting in a degree of underrepresentation far more severe than that of blacks, Hispanics or any other minority groups.”

http://www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu/employers/factsheet.htm

Whites non Hispanic are 48 percent of Harvard undergraduates.  Subtract the 30 percent Jewish and you have 18 percent non-Jewish whites.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem

30 percent of Harvard undergrads are Jewish leaving 18 percent as NJ whites.

Elite Jews have succeeded in ethnically cleansing non-Jewish whites who founded Harvard from Harvard.  Elite Jews use their position to enforce immigration that genocides whites.  These are combined with Department of Labor rules that give priority to hiring non-whites in every job linked to government contracts.

Internet Applicant Recordkeeping rule

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/faqs/iappfaqs.htm

What is the purpose of the Internet Applicant final rule?

The Internet Applicant final rule, issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), addresses recordkeeping by Federal contractors and subcontractors about the Internet hiring process and the solicitation of race, gender, and ethnicity of “Internet Applicants.” The rule is the product of a lengthy deliberative process, including public input, to develop a definition of “Internet Applicant” applicable in the Internet age (added to 41 CFR 60-1.3). The recordkeeping requirements of the rule (amending 41 CFR 60-1.12) will provide meaningful data that OFCCP will use to enhance its enforcement of the nondiscrimination laws.

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/Presentation/Applicant%20Rule%20Presentation_files/frame.htm

http://www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp/regs/compliance/aa.htm

Operation of the Executive Order Program. The EEO Clause
Each contracting agency in the Executive Branch of government must include the equal opportunity clause in each of its nonexempt government contracts. The equal opportunity clause requires that the contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic individuals are considered minorities for purposes of the Executive Order.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

==Excerpt

…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II

==

DOL rules and the Harvard and Stanford admissions policies are covered under (c) and (d).

==http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin Excerpt

Lemkin’s broader concerns over genocide, as set out in his “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe”, [5] also embraced what may be considered as non-physical, namely, psychological acts of genocide which he personally defined as:

  • “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”
  • “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor’s own nationals.”

He also outlined his various observed “techniques” [6] on achieving genocide which ranged from:

  • Political
  • Social
  • Cultural [7] [8]
  • Economic
  • Biological
  • Physical:
  • Endangering Health
  • Mass Killing
  • Religious
  • Moral

==

The elite Jews are thus engaged in genocide of non-Jewish whites.  They must be confronted with their actions.  If we are afraid to confront them with actions of genocide, then they will not stop.   Elite Jews profit from their actions.  They have used the institutions of society to benefit themselves.   Instead of founding a new Harvard they took the one we founded and threw us out.  Founding one of their own would not have helped them genocide us the way taking ours away from us does.  This gives them the entry to write rules against us such as at Department of Labor or at least advocate for these rules and this mindset.

They profited from the bailout to excess.  CEO compensation in 2008 was down less than one percent.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/24/news/economy/corporate_library_executive_compensation/?postversion=2009092417

Elite Jews are engaged in genocide.  We need to confront them with their actions in order to ask them to stop.  If we can’t ask them to stop, they won’t stop.  If we don’t stop them, then we go extinct.

Our genetic extinction by immigration is a type of generalized Ponzi scheme.  Generalized Ponzi schemes involve substituting out the target group and favoring an in group.  Health care reform is a type of generalized Ponzi scheme intended to substitute out whites.

Joel Klein has used his position to fire American programmers and substitute non-American ones.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/05/outsourcing-new-york-schools-hired-future-technology-associates/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/09/17/outsourcing-new-york-city-schools/

From definition of genocide:

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

==

Nesta Bevan at Takimag recounts a conservative, Revilo Oliver, who fell out with William F. Buckley for not appropriately censoring himself.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_forgotten_conservative/

in his posthumous work The Jewish Strategy, he claimed that we are now in the “third stage” of the Jewish onslaught, which has as its goal the killing of all Gentiles.

Given the record of his later years, it is small wonder that contemporary conservatives prefer to ignore Oliver.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revilo_P._Oliver

Revilo Pendleton Oliver (7 July 190810 August 1994) was an American professor of Classical philology, Spanish, and Italian at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who wrote and polemicized extensively for white nationalist causes.

Oliver died in 1994.  The Wright Island Model was first published in 1930.

EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
SEWALL WRIGHT
University of Chicago. Chicago. Illinois
Received January 20. 1930

That immigration causes genetic extinction was thus long known in population genetics.  That measures like affirmative action cause it in the targeted group, whites, is the same math.  Elite Jews were supporting both.  The Ron Unz article of 1998 pointing out non Jewish whites were fewer than Jewish whites at Harvard was only 4 years after Oliver’s death.  The Nagylaki article on the Wright Island Model was published in 1979 also at University of Chicago.

Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

Copyright notice

The Island Model with Stochastic Migration

Thomas Nagylaki

Department of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1213928

The Wright Island Model was in population genetics textbooks long before 1994.

So it was well known in population genetics that the popular idea that immigration causes genetic replacement is fact.  The same applies to affirmative action as a policy that helps all non-whites even immigrants.  Jews support both.  Ted Sorensen wrote Nation of Immigrants under Kennedy’s name and supported immigration.  Thus it was a fact that Jews and elite Jews in particular were advocates of genocide of whites and were part of making it happen.  This is scientific fact and was well before Oliver died and long before William F. Buckley died.

So Oliver was being banned for saying what was proven nearby at University of Chicago starting in 1930.

http://www.takimag.com/article/was_irving_kristol_a_cia_plot/

Richard Spencer writes about Irving Kristol and the neocons at Takimag.  The neocons almost all support immigration and thus almost all support genocide of whites.  Spencer quotes Kristol:

T]he historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy.

Spencer points out the neocons were hijacking the Republican party and that Kristol admitted it.

Thus Oliver was exiled from conservatism by William F. Buckley and became untouchable for saying what is scientific fact, Jews in general and elite Jews in particular are advocates of and are colluding in the genocide of whites.  Neocons according to Kristol are engaged in this genocide against whites “against their respective wills”.

Irving Kristol +  Wright Island Model = Revilo Oliver

Moreover this equality is in the latter years of Oliver, and Kristol too, not just in the early years.  The Wright Island Model has been heavily linked to and cited and requoted here and on many web pages such as Washington Post, Rawstory, etc.  No neocon has reversed his position.

No neocon has cited this authoritative math and reversed his position on legal immigration.  So we can conclude that neocons agree with the popular analysis of white nationalists that immigration is genocide.  They thought that before the theorem was so widely quoted and cited in the popular discussion.  Both sides already, white nationalists and neocons believed already that immigration was genocide of whites the same as in the theorem.

More on the math and simple numerical examples here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/category/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

The numerical examples show how the replacement can proceed quickly. They also show the theorem is not needed for someone familiar with basic arithmetic to show that immigration causes genetic replacement and does so rapidly.  Thus the theorem is redundant to popular understanding.  White nationalists and neocons both agree that immigration and affirmative action for immigrants are genocide of whites.  White nationalists oppose it.  Neocons support it.

==

Elite Jews are engaged in the advocacy of and support of the genocide of non-Jewish whites.  If we are afraid to point this out, then we can’t ask them to stop.  We are entitled to ask them to stop participating in the genocide of non-Jewish whites.  Thus we must point out the complicity of elite Jews in the genocide of non-Jewish whites as a first step to asking them to stop their collusion in the genocide of non-Jewish whites.  Whites need to join those pointing this out and asking them to stop.  We should not turn on our own who point this out and ask them to stop.

The above is draft and preliminary.  Comments and corrections welcome.  This is subject to revision.  All other disclaimers apply.

Vdare blog answers Kennedy eulogies

August 30, 2009

The outstanding writers at the Vdare blog that Peter Brimelow has put together spent Saturday answering the false and harmful eulogies of Teddy Kennedy pouring out from TV.  This continues their excellent work from the week.  The first step to being a good writer is being a clear thinker.  Vdare is on the right side of logic so that is the first step.

Its writers have done an outstanding job pointing out the truth about Kennedy over the years and in this last week.  If anyone is thinking about where to contribute money, its to this team that Peter Brimelow has put together.   This is the hottest team of writers writing anywhere.

While the elite world wept for Kennedy (and Free Republic pulled a thread last week for being too anti-Kennedy) Vdare pointed out the following:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/28/ted-kennedy%E2%80%99s-legacy-symbolism-vs-stark-realities/

[Kevin Lamb] @ 12:07 pm

Historian Douglas Brinkley summarized Kennedy’s legacy as if his political contributions ranked with the Founding Fathers.

The parade of odious court historians who bray out a twisted version of history was on display yesterday and the day before.   Vdare was on the scene to point some of them out. However, this is a work for many to follow their lead and join in.  If you have any memories of this or notice transcripts of it in the days to come be sure to post them on your blog if you have one, here in the comments, or some place.  This is valuable work.

The plagiarist Doris Kearns Goodwin whose career is praising the greatest harm of our most harmful presidents was in full queen bee mode.  She was an assistant to LBJ in the White House.  Not content with her contribution to harming the nation then she went on to try to finish it off with her praise of the poison.   LBJ, FDR and Lincoln and his cabinet she has praised.  This is the trio that destroyed Founding Stock America.

http://www.doriskearnsgoodwin.com/team-of-rivals.php

Obama modeled himself on Lincoln in choosing such cabinet or near cabinet luminaries as Larry Summers, Eric Holder, and Timothy Geithner.  This trio is charged by Obama with finishing off Founding Stock America.   Bailing out Wall Street is an example.  They have done nothing to deal with the risk of large financial institutions as even Stanley Fischer pointed out at a recent meeting of the in crowd.  Obama has said he read Despicable Doris’s tome while choosing his team of the Devil’s Disciples.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/

==

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/kennedycare/

Steve Sailer points out that Kennedycare will remind people to think KopechneCare.  Kopechne was the first person to get Kennedycare, which consisted of a Kennedy Death Panel of one.  She died not from drowing but from slow suffocation.  You can still see ytedk.com website in the archive.  (Make copies if you want one.)

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.ytedk.com

Kennedy left her to die while he went back to his hotel, had a hot shower and a drink and then called friends saing the Protestant bigots will make a big deal of this.

Sailer elaborates on this and points out Kennedy was found with a dead girl in his car and his career lived on just fine.  There are different rules for the genociders and those who are genocided.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/tenure/

==

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/29/obama-kennedy-voice-of-poor-and-powerless-vdarecom-of-which-nationality/

[Patrick Cleburne] @ 3:30 pm

With deadly wit, Patrick Cleburne takes apart the nonsense that Kennedy was for the poor.

Obama lauds Kennedy as voice of poor and powerless
Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:44pm

The VDARE.com response of course is “poor and powerless of which nationality”? Kennedy’s sponsorship of, and unrepentant attempts to expand the 1965 Immigration Act disaster has been an unmitigated catastrophe for the American Working class – particularly Blacks – in terms of income and quality of life. It has to some extent benefited Plutocrats like Kennedy and the upper class generally.

This is an extremely important point and builds on discussion previously this week here and at Vdare back and forth on income inequality graphs being U shaped in the 20th century.

Those posts started with two on Novak and then the Kennedy articles have built on those.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/nation-of-immigrants-robert-novak-called-us-xenophobic-demagogues/e

(Krugman graph on income inequality discussed here:)

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/20/robert-novak-old-atlantic-lighthouse-votes-no/

Link to Krugman graph:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/even-more-gilded/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/ted-kennedy-legacy-median-wages-same-1973/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/ted-kennedy-destroyed-the-greatest-country-that-ever-was-old-atlantic-lighthouse/

Also see Cleburne’s post here pointing out Kennedy’s harm to the working class:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/senator-edward-kennedy-a-disaster-for-his-country/

==

To supplement that discussion, the following references are taken from an earlier post on Joe Guzzardi pointing out how the press has hollowed out itself by its support of immigration.

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/press-watches-people-not-the-powerful/

Berkeley prof Saez’s paper with more graphs of the share of top 1 percent, top 10 percent over the period from before 1924 immigration restriction to today:

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2007.pdf

“Top Incomes in the Long Run of History” with Tony Atkinson and Thomas Piketty, April 2009, forthcoming in A.B. Atkinson and T. Piketty eds., Oxford University Press, 2010 (Tables and Figures in Excel format)

See Fig 13.8 of Excel sheet.  The U shaped countries from 1900 to 2004.  These are the UK, US, CA, AUS, NZ, IN, ARG, SE, NO.   We can see why immigration is popular with the elites in Europe.

Look at Table 13A.19.  The top .1 percent in Norway is in column F.  The top .1 percent went from being around 1 percent of national income in the 1970’s to being as much as 8.41 percent in 2005 as well as other high numbers.  These fluctuate with the stock market.  The very top have gotten a huge share of national income by immigration keeping wages down. These are the people who own the newspapers and TV stations.  They own Hollywood studios

==

Patrick Cleburne gives Kennedy his epitaph

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/26/senator-edward-kennedy-a-disaster-for-his-country/

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

These words should be his epitaph.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.

Because of affirmative action, the alleles are not neutral, but non-white ones are favored.  That just makes it happen faster.  In fact, each gene here individually has a world line that goes extinct under immigration as proven here:

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/immigration-vanishing-survival-theorem/

Peter Brimelow has assembled a brilliant team of Vdare Veterans to stand against the Feckless Fabulists who are legion in the main stream media.  Their names and faces familiar to us.  Academics who once knew the truth and have grown so accustomed to lies they can hardly notice. They are accustomed to their lies not being pointed out which leads them to tell even bigger whoppers.

Krugman posting the income inequality graph that is U shaped is an example.  The daily liars we are exposed to take a toll on us we don’t realize.  Putnam should do a study of that.  It took courage for Peter Brimelow as an editor to turn his group loose on Kennedy’s funeral day.

Most of the rest of the right was silent.  But it was the proper thing to do.  The MSM had their teams of corporate liars spewing out false statements.  Its always the right thing to do to meet lies with truth and to do so instantly.

No family feelings entitle the MSM to get away with lies, which is exactly what the MSM expected.  Its what the speakers expected.  They were put out on national TV for the nation to come to a halt and listen to them.  They plugged health care and uncivil rights and immigration.  Kennedy himself said it in his remarks prepared for his funeral.  Brimelow had the courage to see through the establishment ploy and not hold back like certain other sites like National (morbid) Review.

==1126 AM

Patrick Cleburne extends the great Vdare coverage of Kennedy Week with this article on the Brazilianization of Martha’s Vineyard.  Americans can’t get jobs where Democrats rule.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/08/30/democratic-elite-prefers-marthas-vineyardbrazilian/

North East…Brazil?

Cleburne’s trademark incisive wit on display.

(Lou Dobbs take notice.)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/23/obama-marthas-vineyard-chelsea-clinton

The Guardian asks why MV is Obama’s ideal retreat?  Because Americans can’t get jobs.  Cleburne links to FT in depth article on the history of immigration there.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/e737b6c6-87a1-11de-9280-00144feabdc0.html

Cleburne links to two Vdare classics worth reading:

http://vdare.com/guzzardi/cheap_labor.htm

http://vdare.com/pb/people.htm

Cleburne also documented that Obama got the hedge fund money

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/10/26/hedge-funds-support-obama-why/

Cleburne links to this informative article on the top hedge funds.

http://nymag.com/news/features/2007/hedgefunds/30342/

They wanted their bailout and illegals too.  They want the government to pay for their health care as well as legalize their employers crimes on a rolling ongoing basis.  There are many other jobs they don’t want Founding Stock Americans to do, like Attorney General or Supreme Court justice. Obama has complied.

The subprime gene depression

December 29, 2008

Steve Sailer has pointed out the unPC causes of the subprime mess.  See

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/081228_diversity.htm

He points out we have a depression from a lowering of human capital.   In short, we have subprime genes and the country is going down because of the importation of subprime genes from abroad and growing them at home.  Until those two things are stopped, we can’t stop digging the hole deeper.

We have a depression from subprime:  genes, talent, ethics, honesty, integrity, and sacrifice.  We have an increase in diversity caused corruption, graft, and intimidation.  In short, we are in what seems an ideal world to Jeb Bush, George Bush, Mel Martinez, Bobby Jindal, Mike Pence, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and Bernie Madoff.  The Madoff politicians and MSM are who rule us now and have for some time.

Sailer is trying to craft language that the MSM can pick up instead of just saying its the genes.  This is because they picked up his earlier work on the unPC causes of the subprime mess.  So they may pick up on this.  Their budget now is limited, so plagiarism is cheap.  Moreover, men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, see p60-235.pdf graph page 19.  So the MSM are losing customers who can’t afford to pay for those who root for their replacement.  Sam Zell is losing money on his investment as are others from this simple economic fact.

Low Fertility Liquidity Trap Evolution

December 11, 2007

If fertility is below replacement for each individual, then the increase in the number of  copies of a favorable gene becomes unlikely.  Say that a mutation occurs in an individual.  If from that individual onwards the number of descendants at each generation in the entire tree of descendants is always 2, and we consider that replacement, then its unlikely for that mutation to spread out and take over.

In this scenario, there is almost no selection going on anyhow as we have set it up, at least explicitly.   But aside from that, the number of gene copies will tend to be the same in each generation.  So a favorable mutation, e.g. higher intelligence, doesn’t blow up and take over.

We need a frequency distribution of offspring that includes more than 2.  We also need those with favorable mutations and accumulated branches of them to have fertility greater than 2.

Modernity is working against that.   Modernity doesn’t have much selection and it doesn’t have long chains of above 3 fertility by those with better genes in the sense of intelligence, social skills, etc.  So we have constructed a Liquidity Trap.   Good genes don’t have the liquidity they need in the sense of above 2 fertility to spread through the population.

We need to construct that by societal selection.  We could impose penalties for having children by those with lower genetic potential.  This would mean charging the parents for school instead of providing it free.  It would mean no welfare. We might also give benefits to high IQ children or other favorable traits.  Children who pass tests would be free in school.  Scholarships to college are already a form of that.

We need to have parents with high genetic value to have more than 2 children and those with low to have less than 2.  We have moved in the opposite direction during the last 50 years under the forces of higher labor force participation rates by women and immigration.

Steve Sailer has written on whether evolution has been faster  during the increase in human population over the last X-thousand years, where X can vary.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/12/10/are-humans-evolving-faster/

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/heres-link.html

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/more-press-coverage.html

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/recent-acceleration-of-human-adaptive.html

Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution

John Hawks, Eric T. Wang, Gregory Cochran, Henry C. Harpending, and Robert K. Moyzis

Genomic surveys in humans identify a large amount of recent positive selection. Using the 3.9-million HapMap SNP dataset, we found that selection has accelerated greatly during the last 40,000 years

Here’s the link for “Recent acceleration of adaptive human evolution” by Cochran, Harpending, Hawks, Moyzis, and Wang:
http://www.anthro.utah.edu/PDFs/accel.pnas.smallpdf.pdf

For evolution to happen, we need chains of above 2 fertility for a gene to spread out, unless we had a lot of luck.

These chains might be in stages. So we might have a contraction or funnel stage where the good genes survive in the funnel, even though fertility is below replacement, and the bad genes don’t.  So the population falls but the percentage of a gene rises.

But then the population increases again from that point with above replacement fertility spreading the gene.  Before the funnel, there had to be enough above replacement fertility to spread the gene to the group that survives the funnel.

But to spread a gene out, requires liquidity.  Evolutionary liquidity is in the form of 3 or more offspring surviving to the point of having offspring.  To spread a favorable gene, there need to be long chains with above replacement fertility for the good gene.

These are not happening anymore in the modern world among the white population or much of the East Asian population.  We are instead getting this only in the lower tiers, in the third world population.  Thus we are losing the genetic inheritance of mankind and stopping evolution from the high level it has reached in the white and Asian populations.

So the white and East Asian worlds have arrived into a genetic Liquidity Trap.  They lack the fertility liquidity needed to spread good genes.  The answer is to make having 3 or more children the tendency in those having good genes and 1 or 0 the tendency in those having the worst.

Society needs to structure itself to spread good genes not bad. Right now its spreading bad with welfare, affirmative action, third world immigration into the developed world, etc.  We should have immigration into the 3rd world to spread the better genes in the developed world and below replacement fertility in the 3rd world.  The Genetic Liquidity Trap is a bigger danger to humans then global warming.

Watson and is Detroit in the genes?

October 22, 2007

Please see the disclaimer at the end. Bear in mind, that we are discussing frequency distributions and that not everyone is the same as the average or tail of the groups they belong to. Comparisons among groups are comparisons of frequency distributions.

The flap on James Watson is covered by Steve Sailer at Vdare this morning.

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/071021_watson.htm

Sailer quoting Watson

E.O. Wilson for saying that genes influence the behavior of humans as well as of other animals

Its not just IQ, its behavior.

The following has photos of Detroit’s history and fall into decay. This can’t be blamed on Katrina.

http://detroityes.com/toc.htm

Sailer raises the question of what the liberal establishment is worried about. Its not really Hitler, its more like the following link:

http://www.detroitiscrap.com/

(Dershowitz said in his criticism of Walt and Mearsheimer that they should have cited taboo websites. So if you don’t like this link, send email to Harvard, where one professor seems to think the rules of citation apply at least in this case.)

That link has some interesting information but is surrounded by inappropriate language. But the message of the link is that Detroit was done in by what the MSM won’t say and won’t cover. How many stories about Katrina destroying New Orleans? How many stories about who destroyed Detroit?

One reason to link to the above site is that it has the no major grocery chain store in Detroit story on it.http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070705/METRO/707050349/1003

Grocery closings hit Detroit hard
City shoppers’ choices dwindle as last big chain leaves
Joel J. Smith and Nathan Hurst / The Detroit News

DETROIT — Colleen Rogers isn’t looking forward to crossing the street to shop for even a few groceries.

The store, a locally owned market, is convenient, just steps away from the beauty shop where she works on Livernois in Detroit. But what troubles her is its higher prices, lack of variety and the low quality of fruit, vegetables, meats and other food — staples Rogers could find every day in abundance at the Farmer Jack store near her home that is about to close.

“Sure, there’s other grocery stores, but try finding something to eat in there,” said the 34-year-old skin care specialist. “You can’t buy quality food in the city anymore.”

..

If no grocery stores buy the Farmer Jack locations from the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Detroit will be left without a single national chain supermarket, much less a Wal-Mart or Meijer superstore or a Costco-style warehouse store.

Analysts say no other major city in America is such a supermarket desert. And it’s not likely to change anytime soon.

Over the years, national chains have located in Detroit, only to pull up stakes and flee. There are a multitude of reasons, according to retail analysts, with the major deterrent being the high cost of doing business in the city.

“Sometimes even the people that live in the neighborhood don’t feel safe shopping in the store,” said David J. Livingston, a supermarket expert from Wisconsin. “They’ll drive right past that Detroit store to go to a suburban store where they feel more comfortable.”

Note these are blacks living in Detroit who presumably are being talked about. So there is black flight from blacks in Detroit? Is that what Mexican immigration is? Mexican flight from Mexicans?

Expired food is a problem

Most independent food stores in Detroit are owned and operated by Chaldeans, some of whom have been in business for 40 or more years. A few are owned by African-Americans.

ACORN has been picketing stores it contends have been selling expired meats and unhealthy foods.

“We have problems with meat and produce being expired,” Hollins said. “We have no security in the parking lots, …”

That is the store’s problem? ACORN as presumably representing the local community is telling store owners they are responsible for security in the parking lot against people from the local community? Shouldn’t the local community provide security to the store?

“…no restrooms in the stores and a poor selection of food products. When you cross Eight Mile, these problems all disappear. The poor folks, who don’t have transportation to the suburbs to shop, are being taken advantage of.”

So people migrated to Detroit in the early 20th century, a functioning city, chased the people who lived there to the suburbs, and now they have to go to the suburbs to shop? Ken Burns “The War” was covering how bad the whites were in Detroit during the war. But now we have this story.

This is why the MSM doesn’t talk about Detroit. It only leads to inconvenient truths. That is what Watson is, inconvenient truth. That is what immigration is.

This story on Detroit would indicate something to be studied with grants and no obligation to come to one conclusion over another. Also it should be published, without the author or institution or journal deciding not to. We need to find out what is going on.

Watson is saying that the genes for IQ and also behavior will be found in 10 years. E. O. Wilson says our behavior is genetic in large part, not just taught. Of course, what happened in Detroit is partly from behavior that is genetic and part that is from behavior that is taught.

So we are left with the implication from Watson, Wilson, and others that in 10 years we likely will find that, at least in part, Detroit is in the genes. We will find that the behaviors that lead to it are in the genes. This potentially might also include genes for racism that lead to black on white crime.

That is the type of finding that would run contrary to the whole concept of liberalism in the 20th century. If there is DNA coded for racism, and black on white crime is a reflection of that, then this is also active in less visible situations. So there is likely discrimination by blacks in hiring, employment, courts, jury duty (O. J. Simpson case), etc. under this hypothesis.

This hypothesis undermines the whole case for the current form of civil rights and desegregation. This hypothesis might indicate lack of proper medical care might happen as a result of this coding. That would imply that hospitals should be segregated for example so that each race gets the proper care.

If racism is coded in the DNA, and if its not just violent crime, but every interaction that is influenced by it, then the conclusion is that segregation is a civil right. Not giving people segregated schools, hospitals, work places, etc violates their civil rights, because discrimination by race is coded into DNA. This is a possible conclusion that we may reach from decoding the DNA of racism. We also may find that black violence on whites or the O.J. Simpson jury’s behavior is because blacks are less able to control the DNA racism gene because they lack a gene that lets them overcome that.

All the liberals who have said that whites are the evil ones and acted without basis in history may find their position undermined. If its shown that black behavior is genetic and that this is what caused the ruins of Detroit, the O.J. Simpson jury verdict, black on white violence, then some would say it shows that the “bigots” were right all along.

Sailer talks about how the President of Harvard, Derek Bok, is worried that his “scholarship” for affirmative action will be undermined by the DNA decoding that Watson predicts in 10 years. Sailer indicates that the left will try to suppress and reinterpret the findings. However, the above issues will inevitably arise.

We can see the images of ruined Detroit. We can read the report that no national grocery chain will put a store in the city of Detroit. We can read the statistics on black on white violence. We can read the IQ gap literature. Its not just IQ, its behavior as E. O. Wilson of Harvard said. We are about to see that science disagrees with liberalism. Liberalism makes statements, and science proves them false.

This means that many people that liberalism has sidelined will be shown to have been trying to understand reality instead of ignore it. This includes Vdare, Lawrence Auster, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, and many others. It will undermine the position of many groups like SPLC. It will also say that most of immigration is harmful. It brings not only people with low IQ, but with low self control, and bad behaviors including racism that they are not able to control. This comes out not just in crime, but in other situations as well. That undermines the whole basis of immigration. It may show that cross-racial assimilation may be largely a myth and essentially false.

==

How could a great American city reach the point that no major grocery store chain will put a store in the city of Detroit?

Did liberalism and its policies undermine Detroit Motors not just Detroit? At least in part? Are we losing our industry for the sake of a false theory of society?

Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973. Is this because liberalism instituted desegregation that undermined the reality of the environment students need to learn? Is learning in a homogeneous group better for children?

Has desegregation undermined our ability to compete in the world and even maintain our civilization? Are schools in East Asia better because of homogeneity of the students and the teachers? Do teachers of different race fail to teach self-worth? Is the message of the accomplishments of past generations and their contributions not taught in a way to inspire scientists in our schools today? Does this violate the civil rights of students? Of workers? Are we on a downward spiral over a false theory, liberalism?

Does homogeneity help East Asian factories compete? Is this part of their competitive advantage over the U.S.? These are the issues raised by the critics of Watson by the things they say. The critics say if Watson is true, it would imply that the critics theory of society is false and harmful. That is why they react with such fury against him. As Steve Sailer says, like Derek Bok, the President of Harvard, they already know their theory is false.

==

Black migration to Detroit led to the demise of the city. This is historical fact. This was what the conflict was that Ken Burns The War was indirectly alluding to, insofar as it may have mentioned Detroit. That conflict was lost in the sense that Detroit became a ruined city relative to its past greatness. Now we are seeing black flight from blacks in Detroit, at least to shop.

If Mexican migration is Mexican flight from Mexicans, what does that imply it will do to our cities? They will go the same way as Detroit. In fact, its not just our cities, its our suburbs. Asylum refugees are doing the same thing to communities. Asylum refugees are by definition in flight from the people in their home countries, i.e. people like themselves.

The message of Watson and Wilson is that behavior is in the genes and there are race differences in genes and thus behavior. IQ tests are just one form of behavior, one often called, “acting white”.

Moreover, conflict between races may be in the genes as well. Assimilation is a painful process at best, and likely not to happen. That is in the DNA is what we have to consider. The migration of blacks to Detroit and other cities has to be considered as the cause of their fall. This is another forbidden truth from the MSM. The MSM present “news” to keep us from the news. The schools teach “history” to keep us from history we can use. The same applies to Ken Burns History and PC Official History.

This section, like the rest, is to be interpreted as a hypothesis and draft. Other factors played a role in the fall of American cities. However, where countries were homogeneous, we did not see a fall of cities from these factors. Cities didn’t decay in Japan after World War II, despite being bombed. Nor in Europe, until the advent of immigration. Bombing didn’t cause lasting damage to cities the way immigration did.

==Sailer quoting Watson

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/071021_watson.htm

“Last week, Watson told the Sunday Times of London that he was:”

“‘inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa’ because ‘all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really.'” [The elementary DNA of Dr Watson, By Charlotte Hunt-Grubbe, October 14, 2007]

This is about the Africans in Detroit the MSM say, not just those in Africa. Watson is saying that DNA proves that liberalism is just lies. Its a false theory.

As Watson reveals in his book, Bok basically knows the score already. (Steve Sailer)

Harvard knows liberalism, as a factual theory of equal ability is false. Ability isn’t equal. Watson and Wilson also lead to the issue that behavior isn’t the same and is in the DNA. Thus what happened to Detroit is in the DNA of those who did it to Detroit. This is the conclusion the MSM fear.

The MSM already don’t report on Detroit or its history. They already know who did it. They already know its not something in the remote past. The last big grocery store pulled out of Detroit in 2007. This is behavior in the present. Watson and Wilson lead us to ask is this behavior in the present from DNA in the present?

To speak of Detroit except in terms of white racism is forbidden by the MSM and Harvard. Watson and Wilson threaten to lift that veil. This is, as Sailer quotes Orwell, crimethink.

We can wordsmith the Watson quote, with changes emphasized:

“‘inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa’ because ‘all our social policies are based on the fact that their behavior is the same as ours – whereas all the history says not really.'”

Its not just IQ. Its not just scores on a test. IQ is about predicting behavior. This is the real issue. Is there behavior different than ours because their genes are different?

Sailer on Derek Bok, President of Harvard, asking Watson when DNA of IQ (and behavior) would be mapped:

So he had a particular reason to hope the dread date (2017) would fall well out into his dotage—when nobody would ask him embarrassing questions about why he (Bok of Harvard) institutionalized punitive discrimination against, notably, white males.

==Disclaimer

This is very draft and preliminary. For many the above are sensitive topics. However, we need to take a scientific approach. That is what Watson and Wilson, and Steve Sailer are telling us. The above is subject to substantial revision. All comments are welcome. The above are hypotheses, speculation or opinion. This weblog considers contradictory hypotheses or ideas.

Re: President George Bush Renewing Efforts on Immigration

April 9, 2007

“President Renewing Efforts on Immigration Plan for Overhaul Faces Battle in Divided Congress”

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 9, 2007; Page A01

See comments by Patrick Cleburne at

Problem for Amnesty: Troops unwilling.

Follow up WaPo Article

Bush Pushes Immigration Plan, Guest Worker Program

By Michael A. Fletcher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 9, 2007; 3:36 PM
Comments at Follow Up article
==Comments original WaPo article posted at WaPo below

What follows is a mess. Its notes while posting comments at WaPo on the Bush immigration speech. In some cases, the links that were used to source quotes are included. But these are not formatted as live links at this point.
==

Men’s median wages peaked in 1973. See p60-231.pdf a publication of the census at census.gov. Search on p60-231.pdf is enough. Income inequality is U shaped in the 20th century. Search on “u shaped” income inequality Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez. Saez is a Berkeley prof. He has data to download from his website. They have an NBER paper. They find that the top 1 percent got 20 percent of national income before immigration restriction in the 1920’s, they got 10 percent after and then after the 1965 Immigration Act, legal immigration, it has gone back up to 20 percent. Search NEW DATA SHOW EXTRAORDINARY JUMP IN INCOME CONCENTRATION IN 2004
By Aviva Aron-Dine and Isaac Shapiro to see a graph of the percentage share of national income of the top 1 percent. The Bush family is in the top 1 percent. So are Kennedy and McCain. So is Sheikh Pelosi.

==

quote Mr. Luntz is 80 percent right. The richest 20 percent of American households—and only the richest 20 percent—have enjoyed higher real incomes during the Bush expansion. Everyone else has lost ground; the lowest 20 percent has actually lost a full 1.8 percent. (For details, click here: Table 1.) end quote September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality
at Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==Edwin S. Rubenstein quotation:

Until recently, economists rarely mentioned the I-word when explaining the income distribution. The consensus among most academics was that the primary cause of increased inequality was “skill-biased technical change” (SBTC)—i.e., increased economic rewards to educated, technically savvy workers.

In a word, SBTC compensation was based on merit. How quaint!

Northwestern University economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon broke from the group naiveté in a paper published last year:

“If SBTC had been a major source of the rise in inequality, then we should have observed an increase in relative wages of those most directly skilled in the development and use of computers. Yet in the 1989-97 period….total real compensation of CEOs increased by 100 percent, while those in occupations related to math and computer science increased only 4.8 percent and engineers decreased by 1.4 percent.” [Where did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, (PDF) Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon, Northwestern University]

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==quotation Edwin S. Rubenstein:

quote In debunking SBTC the authors make a broader historical point regarding immigration:

“To be convincing, a theory must fit the facts, and the basic facts to be explained about income equality are not one but two, that is, not only why inequality rose after the mid-1970s but why it declined from 1929 to the mid-1970s. Three events fit neatly into this U-shaped pattern, all of which influence the effective labor supply curve and the bargaining power of labor: (1) the rise and fall of unionization, (2) the decline and recovery of immigration, and (3) the decline and recovery in the importance of international trade and the share of imports…”

“Partly as a result of restrictive legislation in the 1920s, and also the Great Depression and World War II, the share of immigration per year in the total population declined from 1.3 percent in 1914 to 0.02 percent in 1933, remained very low until a gradual recovery began in the late 1960s, reaching 0.48 percent (legal and illegal) in 2002. Competition for unskilled labor not only arrives in the form of immigration but also in the form of imports, and the decline of the import share from the 1920s to the 1950s and its subsequent recovery is a basic fact of the national accounts.” end quote. September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==quotation Edwin S. Rubenstein:

quote But the foreign-born share of the labor force—15 percent in 2005—is also unprecedented. Since 2001 illegals have accounted for most of immigrant labor force growth.

Cheap immigrant labor induces only a nugatory increase in total native income. Its biggest impact, according to Harvard economist George Borjas, is to redistribute income from native workers to employers.

Recent data seem to confirm this. The construction industry is booming, home builders are racking up record profits, yet average construction wages have fallen between 15 percent and 35 percent across the country—the result of cheap immigrant labor.

Similarly, the service industries—restaurants, hotels, motels, cleaning companies, etc. – are major employers of immigrant labor. These industries are booming, creating wealth for executives and shareholders. But average real wages of service industry workers have declined since 2001. end quote April 06, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
The Smoking Bottom Line: Immigration Boosting Profits, Cutting Wages Vdare.com

==

http://www.vdare.com/walker/dui.htm

quote Traditionally, drinking to excess is valued in Mexican and Latin culture, where it is seen an expression of machismo. Moreover, MADD reports that Hispanics believe it takes 6-8 drinks to affect driving, while Americans think it takes 2-4 drinks.

In 2001, according to MADD, 44.1 percent of California’s drunk driving arrests in 2001 were of Hispanics, although Hispanics made up only 31.3 percent of the state’s population.

The general incidence of drunk driving has worsened in California—parallel with the skyrocketing Latino population. Accidents involving drunk drivers increased overall nearly 5 percent in the state in 2000, with an uptick in Los Angeles County of 7.6 percent in that year. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for Hispanics ages 1-44. end quote Brenda Walker Vdare.com

==

quote THE MIDDLE CLASS IS NOT BEING WIPED OUT, THIS ASSERTION IS NONSENSE, the unemployment rate is 5 percent and wages are rising. We are not going to deport 12 million people, without creating a police state that people woud never support.

By RealChoices | Apr 9, 2007 6:56:50 AM | end quote. Men’s median wages are lower than in 1973. See p60-231.pdf graph page 18 at census.gov. Just search on p60-231 in google.

==

L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.
by Brentin Mock Southern Poverty Love Center.

quote “The way I hear these knuckleheads tell it, they don’t want their neighborhoods infested with blacks, as if it’s an infestation,” says respected Los Angeles gang expert Tony Rafael, who interviewed several Latino street gang leaders for an upcoming book on the Mexican Mafia, the dominant Latino gang in Southern California. “It’s pure racial animosity that manifests itself in a policy of a major criminal organization.”

“There’s absolutely no motive absent the color of their skin,” adds former Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Michael Camacho. Before he became a judge, in 2003, Camacho successfully prosecuted a Latino gang member for the random shootings of three black men in Pomona, Calif. end quote

==
June 05, 2006
Time To Rethink Immigration (II): Freeing America From The Immigration Gulag

By Peter Brimelow
quote Moratorium on legal immigration. Not no gross immigration but no net immigration—which would permit an inflow of 200,000 a year or so, enough to take care of hardship cases, needed skills etc. Abandon the principle of “family reunification,” which in practice has meant uncontrollable chain migration. Immigrants should be admitted on own merits.

bullet Abolish “refugee” category. In practice, this is simply an expedited, subsidized immigration program for politically-favored groups. Anyway, humanitarian aid is best given in situ—for example, the “Somali Bantu” could have been resettled in Mozambique, not Maine. America is not the world’s Kleenex. end quote June 05, 2006
Time To Rethink Immigration (II): Freeing America From The Immigration Gulag

By Peter Brimelow Vdare.com

==

Immigration, legal, amnesty, refugee, means the end of social security, medicare, medicaid, functional schools, ERs, and health insurance at work. Men’s median wages were higher in 1973, see p60-231.pdf at census.gov, graph page 18. The reason they cut health benefits is the same reason, to cut our wages. Government can’t afford what we don’t make. We can’t have national health insurance for the 3rd world. We are losing our health coverage by legal immigration. We must have zero immigration to save our way of life.

==

Bush is disloyal to the American people.

..

Bush: America is an idea not people. The American
people can be discarded in the dustbin of history.

==

Bush what matters is the idea of freedom, not the people
who want to be free, they can be discarded as refuse.

Iraq was for freedom as an idea, Abu Ghraib was for the actual people. Bushism is Stalinism. Believe in Bush and you will be free in Stalin.

==

Bush’s Iraq promise was for freedom as an idea. Bush’s Abu Ghraib was for the actual people.

==

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

Brentin Mock continued
quote A comprehensive study of hate crimes in Los Angeles County released by the University of Hawaii in 2000 concluded that while the vast majority of hate crimes nationwide are not committed by members of organized groups, Los Angeles County is a different story. Researchers found that in areas with high concentrations, or “clusters,” of hate crimes, the perpetrators were typically members of Latino street gangs who were purposely targeting blacks.

Furthermore, the study found, “There is strong evidence of race-bias hate crimes among gangs in which the major motive is not the defense of territorial boundaries against other gangs, but hatred toward a group defined by racial identification, regardless of any gang-related territorial threat.”
Six years later, the racist terror campaign continues. end quote

SPLC L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.
by Brentin Mock

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

==

Don’t protect politicians who commit crimes. They are disloyal to us on immigration. Let Bush go to jail for torture. Let Kennedy go to jail for Chappaquiddick. These politicians have a long list of suspect transactions. If you have even a little information send it to groups that forward information on crime or Judicial Watch or blog it anonymously. You don’t have to be a hero and go into the FBI. Turn your information over to organizations that go after politicians. You don’t have to tell your boss. There are tipster organizations you can contact.

==

quote The question is asked, who will pick the fruits and vegetables, who will do the construction jobs, who will do the jobs in the service industry? Which in turn begs the question, who owns the farms, who is having the house built, who owns the hotel and the restraunt? And the answer is the rich, the upper 10 who exploit these illegals,who are just trying to have a better way of life. If these people were made to pay better wages then maybe a lot more people could have a better way of life

By johnleebowes | Apr 9, 2007 10:41:40 AM | end quote. Put employers of illegals in prison and they can pick the fruit on a chain gang. What about politicians who vote the way they get contributions. They will want to have a jury decide if they did right, won’t they? To clear their name?

==

Jack Abramoff can probably fill the farms with chain gang pols from his contribution rolodex. And he isn’t the only one. The K street gang documented by the Post can fill our farms with their labor.

==

quote Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos, were sentenced to 12 years and 11 years, respectively, in October by U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Cardone end quote WND. Members of Congress and Senators and lobbyists will want juries to determine if the contributions they gave for earmarks were bribery, won’t they? They will want to clear their name before their constituents? If border guards go to jail for dangerous work, shouldn’t Senators who take money from special interests face the people on a jury?

“u shaped” income inequality Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez
http://www.vdare.com/walker/dui.htm

May 04, 2004
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Drunk Driving

By Brenda Walker

==

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=181

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-harbor4mar04,0,5714315.story?coll=la-home-headlines

How a community imploded
L.A. long ignored Harbor Gateway. Now a Latino gang calls the shots.
By Sam Quinones, Times Staff Writer
March 4, 2007

==

Thomas Piketty

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/mccain-fighting-to-recapture-maverick-spirit-of-2000-bid/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR2007030300841.html

==

April 08, 2007

NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON’T want your name and/or email address published when sending VDARE email.

04/07/07 – A Jewish Immigration Dissident Advises David Orland Not To Hold His Breath
Today’s Letter: A Reader Experiences Censorship

Re: LAPD: “We Don’t Get Into” Immigration Status Of Christmas Story Director’s Killer By Nicholas Stix

From: An “Irate Reader”

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_040807.htm
==

“u shaped” site:vdare.com

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/

http://www.nber.org/papers/W8467

http://www.cbpp.org/7-10-06inc.htm

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060406_nd.htm

http://www.vdare.com/pb/060605_gulag.htm

http://www.vdare.com/bulletins/031907_bulletin.htm

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/03/04/mexican-gangs-ethnic-cleansing-of-black-amercans-in-los-angeles/

Duane Chapman bounty hunter mexico

http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/dog-bounty-hunter-star-duane-chapman-arrested-for-capture-1009823.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Chapman

==

m.jagger | Apr 9, 2007 11:38:04 AM is right. Also, as others pointed out, illegals here and those who would come here can make their own countries better rather than keeping us from having children by taking away job security for young adults. Think of all the children not born to Americans since Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act because men’s median wages stopped going up in 1973. quote ==

“Numbers Drop for the Married With Children
Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent”

By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03

PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.

As marriage with children becomes an exception rather than the norm, social scientists say it is also becoming the self-selected province of the college-educated and the affluent.

“The culture is shifting, and marriage has almost become a luxury item, one that only the well educated and well paid are interested in,” said Isabel V. Sawhill, an expert on marriage and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Many demographers peg the rise of a class-based marriage gap to the erosion since 1970 of the broad-based economic prosperity that followed World War II. end quote

The 1965 Immigration Act caused this. Men’s median wages are down from 1973. Search p60-229.pdf and go to page 14 on census.gov. 51 percent of women live alone. This is because men don’t make enough.Female fertility is then below replacement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=201

==

quote *Mens median wages peaked in 1973. See p60-231.pdf a publication of the census at census.gov. Search on p60-231.pdf is enough.* What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. end quote quote Until recently, economists rarely mentioned the I-word when explaining the income distribution. The consensus among most academics was that the primary cause of increased inequality was “skill-biased technical change” (SBTC)—i.e., increased economic rewards to educated, technically savvy workers.

In a word, SBTC compensation was based on merit. How quaint!

Northwestern University economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon broke from the group naiveté in a paper published last year:

“If SBTC had been a major source of the rise in inequality, then we should have observed an increase in relative wages of those most directly skilled in the development and use of computers. Yet in the 1989-97 period….total real compensation of CEOs increased by 100 percent, while those in occupations related to math and computer science increased only 4.8 percent and engineers decreased by 1.4 percent.” [Where did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, (PDF) Ian Dew-Becker and Robert J. Gordon, Northwestern University] end quote September 26, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
It’s Official: Immigration Causing Income Inequality

==

Second post has a different quotation from Vdare on U shaped timing show that share of top 1 percent, the Bush Pelosi McCain Kennedy group, went from 20 percent before 1920’s restriction to 10 percent during restriction back to 20 percent with legal immigration. This shows its legal and illegal immigration that is the cause of men’s median wages being below 1973. Sorry if 2nd post above looks like the same post over again, but the reply is different. Also thanks to Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 12:14:00 PM | for his research and insights in replying to this, that the rise in women’s wages is simply creating men and women living apart with no kids or a single parent with kids. In fact, the Post has reported on that several times. 51 percent of women live without a spouse. Married with kids is the privilege of the affluent according to Post reporting. quote “Numbers Drop for the Married With Children
Institution Becoming The Choice of the Educated, Affluent”

By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 4, 2007; Page A03

PORTLAND, Ore. — Punctuating a fundamental change in American family life, married couples with children now occupy fewer than one in every four households — a share that has been slashed in half since 1960 and is the lowest ever recorded by the census.

As marriage with children becomes an exception rather than the norm, social scientists say it is also becoming the self-selected province of the college-educated and the affluent.

“The culture is shifting, and marriage has almost become a luxury item, one that only the well educated and well paid are interested in,” said Isabel V. Sawhill, an expert on marriage and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Many demographers peg the rise of a class-based marriage gap to the erosion since 1970 of the broad-based economic prosperity that followed World War II. end quote

The 1965 Immigration Act caused this. Men’s median wages are down from 1973. Search p60-229.pdf and go to page 14 on census.gov. 51 percent of women live alone. This is because men don’t make enough.Female fertility is then below replacement.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/03/04/mexican-gangs-ethnic-cleansing-of-black-amercans-in-los-angeles/

Hispanic ethnic cleansing blacks site:Vdare.com

ethnic cleansing blacks site:Vdare.com

u shaped site:vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070318_diversity.htm

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=722

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/01/25/

http://wordpress.com/tag/income-inequality-graph/

https://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/mccain-fighting-to-recapture-maverick-spirit-of-2000-bid/

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060926_nd.htm

==

quote Economists Ian Dew-Becker and Robert Gordon have compared wage and salary growth within the richest ten percent of American earners with that of the median wage earner. [Ian Dew-Becker, Robert J. Gordon, Where Did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2:2005. PDF]

Here are their results, adjusted for inflation, for the years 1966 to 2001:
bullet Median wage and salary: +11 percent
bullet 90th percentile: +58 percent
bullet 99th percentile: +121 percent
bullet 99.9th percentile: +236 percent end quote
January 29, 2007
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
Yes, Tyler, Income Inequality Is Real. And Immigration Is A Cause. Vdare.com

==

quote July 28, 2003
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
Hispanic Family Values?
Illegitimacy rates: unmarried Hispanic women aged 15-44 are about one-third again as likely to have a child as unmarried black women in that age bracket – 93.4 per 1,000 vs. 71.5 – and more than three times as an unmarried white women (27.9 per 1,000). [Source: Centers For Disease Control, pdf file]

bullet Abortion: Hispanic women are two and a half times more likely to have abortions than white women (33 per 1,000 annually vs. 13) and nearly-two thirds as likely as black women (49). [Source: Guttmacher Institute]

bullet Teenage pregnancy: Hispanics are high (about 94 per 1,000 vs. 32 for whites) and relatively worsening – they’ve now surpassed blacks (83 per 1,000). [Source: Centers For Disease Control, pdf file]

bullet Dependency: Nearly one-third (30.6%) of Hispanics receive means-tested benefits, compared to less than a tenth (9.2%) of non-Hispanic whites and just over a third (35.0%) of blacks. [Source: U.S. Census, pdf file]

bullet Criminality: just over one in every hundred adult male Hispanics (1.2%) was imprisoned in 2001 – almost a third of the non-Hispanic black rate (3.5%) and well over twice the non-Hispanic white rate (0.5%). [Source: Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 2001, pdf file]

bullet Risky behavior: The Hispanic death rate from HIV disease is 2.5-times that of whites (7 per 100,000 vs. 2.8), and about one-third of the black rate (24). [National Center For Health Statistics, pdf file]

end quote
==

quote Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall
Deadbeat Dads Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande

“Family Values Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande.”

That’s a slogan George W. Bush uses to justify illegal immigration.
Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall
Deadbeat Dads Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande

“Family Values Don’t Stop At The Rio Grande.”
The problem of emigrants abandoning their families is so bad that some of these poor Mexican women have actually written to VDARE.COM for help! One of them told us (my translation) that

“…my husband is an illegal alien, and has been for approximately a year and a half. I haven’t seen him for 3 years and I would like him sent back to Mexico, where he was born… I am a desperate woman with 4 children and I can’t provide for them, we live in poverty…Help me…”

This desperate lady wants the U.S. to deport her husband, and she actually included the guy’s address in California.

That’s a slogan George W. Bush uses to justify illegal immigration.
One of the towns in Susuapan is Tremecino:

“In Tremecino 25% of the mothers are left alone with their children, expecting a husband who may return this year, in 2 years or more, if at all.”

By the way, in Tremecino, the average age of marriage or cohabitation is 14!

One of the inhabitants of Tremecino is Rosa:

“…She had 4 children when her husband emigrated to Tucson. She was expecting him to send her money but it never arrived, because the man became an alcoholic and found another woman.”

==

quote It’s not widely understood, but the 1986 federal amnesty for illegal immigrants set off a baby boom among unskilled Hispanics in California that began in 1988 and lasted into the late 1990s, with consequences for gang activity that have just recently become palpable.

Demographers Laura E. Hill and Hans P. Johnson of the Public Policy Institute of California wrote in 2002:

“Between 1987 and 1991, total fertility rates for foreign-born Hispanics [in California] increased from 3.2 to 4.4 [expected babies per woman over her lifetime]. … Why did total fertility rates increase so dramatically for Hispanic immigrants? First, the composition of the Hispanic immigrant population in California changed as a result of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986. In California alone, 1.6 million unauthorized immigrants applied for amnesty (legal immigrant status) under this act. The vast majority were young men, and many were agricultural workers who settled permanently in the United States. Previous research indicates that many of those granted amnesty were joined later by spouses and relatives in the United States… As a result, many young adult Hispanic women came to California during the late 1980s. (“Understanding the Future of Californians’ Fertility: The Role of Immigrants”).

This ex-illegal immigrant baby boom created an indigestible population pig-in-a-python that overwhelmed California’s public schools in the 1990s, with many having to shift to disruptive year round schedules. The LA Unified School District alone has budgeted $19 billion for construction to accommodate the immigration-driven growth in student numbers. end quote March 18, 2007
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Gang Warfare

By Steve Sailer Vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070318_diversity.htm

==

Search construction industry wages site:vdare.com

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060406_nd.htm

quote The last few years should have been good ones for labor. Since February 2004 more than 4 million jobs have been created. Output per worker increased by 3.5 percent in 2004 and 2.7 percent last year. Yet the balance of power continued shifting from labor to capital. Not only did profits spike as a share of GDP, but real median income actually declined in 2003 and 2004 (the latest available year.) end quote quote Recent data seem to confirm this. The construction industry is booming, home builders are racking up record profits, yet average construction wages have fallen between 15 percent and 35 percent across the country—the result of cheap immigrant labor. end quote April 06, 2006
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein
The Smoking Bottom Line: Immigration Boosting Profits, Cutting Wages Vdare.com

==

quote Americans also know that there are resulting consequences for such massive uncontrolled illegal immigration. One result will be a population explosion! Do the math– it’s breathtaking! If all 20 to 23 million illegal aliens here today are given guest worker amnesty along with “family reunification,” it will add roughly 60 million people to the current legal population of 293 million.(12) In 2050, just forty-four years from now, demographers say there will be half a billion people residing in America!(13) Just imagine what kind of impact that will have on our natural resources and quality of life! end quote Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
March 16, 2006 Anarchy Reigns ~ Enforce the Laws ~ Stop The Invasion

==

quote Today, California’s amnesty baby boom generation is between ages 10 and 19, entering their prime gang violence years. … California is now exporting its illegal immigration problem—gang wars, overcrowded schools, declining standards of living, and the like—to the other 49 states. end quote March 18, 2007
Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Gang Warfare

By Steve Sailer

==

quote L.A. Blackout
Acting on orders from the Mexican Mafia, Latino gang members in Southern California are terrorizing and killing blacks.

According to gang experts and law enforcement agents, a longstanding race war between the Mexican Mafia and the Black Guerilla family, a rival African-American prison gang, has generated such intense racial hatred among Mexican Mafia leaders, or shot callers, that they have issued a “green light” on all blacks. A sort of gang-life fatwah, this amounts to a standing authorization for Latino gang members to prove their mettle by terrorizing or even murdering any blacks sighted in a neighborhood claimed by a gang loyal to the Mexican Mafia.

“This attitude is pretty pervasive throughout all the [Latino] gangs,” says Tim Brown, a Los Angeles County probation supervisor. “As long as [street] gangs are heavily influenced by the prison gangs, particularly the Mexican Mafia, racism is just part and parcel of why they come into being and why they continue to exist.” But with the Mexican Mafia’s shadow looming over Los Angeles, it may be a long time before the rapidly growing number of streets claimed by Latino gangs are safe for blacks, if ever.
“It’s not just Highland Park. It’s almost anywhere in L.A. that you could find yourself in a difficult position [as a black person],” says Lewis, the LAPD probation officer. “All blacks are on green light no matter where.”
by Brentin Mock end quote SPLC

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=281

==

7 of the top 8 wealthiest Senators voted for S. 2611, amnesty, affirmative action, non-deportable crime, and a pathway for the top 1 percent of households to continue to enjoy 20 percent of each year’s income, compared to 10 percent before Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. The only 1 of the top 8 who didn’t vote for S. 2611 didn’t vote, Jay Rockefeller. McCain is 7th and Kennedy 8th in wealth.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.asp?type=W&cycle=2005&filter=S

Rank Name Minimum Net Worth Maximum Net Worth

1 Herb Kohl (D-Wis) $219,098,029 to $234,549,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

2 John Kerry (D-Mass) $165,741,511 to $235,262,100

Voted Yes S. 2611

3 Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa) $78,150,023 to $101,579,003 Not Voting S. 2611

4 Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) $43,343,464 to $98,660,021 Voted Yes S. 2611

5 Lincoln D. Chafee (R-RI) $41,153,105 to $64,096,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

6 Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) $38,198,170 to $90,733,019 Voted Yes S. 2611

7 John McCain (R-Ariz) $25,071,142 to $38,043,014

Voted Yes S. 2611

8 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $19,189,049 to $93,043,004 Voted Yes S. 2611

S 2611 Roll Call Senators understand: immigration goes up, wages go down. Wages go down Senators’ stocks go up. Men’s median wages are lower than
in 1973, Senators’ stocks go up. Top 1 percent get 20 percent of national income today and 10 percent in 1965, Senators’ stocks go up. Bush family and Pelosi family are also in the top 1 percent.

==

quote Poll: Most Americans Don’t Want Continuing
Large U.S. Population Growth

As Nation Hits 300 Million Milestone, Voters Prefer
Reduced Immigration Over Adding Another 100 Million

Commentary by Roy Beck * endquote NumbersUSA Posted on another thread by
blowe1 | Apr 9, 2007 2:43:58 PM

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/04/sweet_blog_special_bush_return.html

8th amnesty?

==

quote What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. by RealChoices from Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 4:39:28 PM above. In addition to Pacthed’s arguments above and earlier in response to this point by RealChoices it should be pointed out that women’s wages are still below men’s. But men’s are below what they were in 1973. So women’s wages now are still less than men’s wages in 1973. That is the argument of Bush, McCain and Kennedy for immigration, that its kept wages for women below what men’s wages were in 1973. How many women have thought that was society’s goal? I haven’t heard many women saying they wanted women’s wages to stay below men’s wages in 1973 for their entire working life from 1973 to now. Search p60-231.pdf in google and go to page 18 for the graph. It has men’s and women’s wages. Is the future for women that Kennedy promises them is that their wages will stay below the wages of men in 1973?

==

quote What OldAtlantic never mentions is wages of women have rising considerably and more than made up for the drop in the wages of men. These trends have very little to illegal immigration. by RealChoices from Pacthed | Apr 9, 2007 4:39:28 PM above. In addition to Pacthed’s arguments above and earlier in response to this point by RealChoices it should be pointed out that women’s wages are still below men’s. But men’s are below what they were in 1973. So women’s wages now are still less than men’s wages in 1973. That is the argument of Bush, McCain and Kennedy for immigration, that its kept wages for women below what men’s wages were in 1973. How many women have thought that was society’s goal? I haven’t heard many women saying they wanted women’s wages to stay below men’s wages in 1973 for their entire working life from 1973 to now. Search p60-231.pdf in google and go to page 18 for the graph. It has men’s and women’s wages. Is the future for women that Kennedy promises them is that their wages will stay below the wages of men in 1973? The ratio of women’s wages to men’s went from 60 percent in 1959 to about 77 percent in 2005. This is what women were hoping for? That 77 percent is 77 percent of men’s wages in 2005, but men’s wages in 2005 were lower than men’s wages in 1973. So women are getting less than 77 percent of what men’s wages were in 1973. Is that what women have been working for? Is that the future they want? A women who started working in 1965, the year of Kennedy’s immigration act and who worked to this year would have worked 42 years, all of them at less than 77 percent of what men made in 1973. Was that the goal? Do they thank Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act and its legal immigration for that lifetime of underpay?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=321

=

Another way to think of this. Suppose men made 100 in 1973 and women made 60 percent, or 60. Women go to 77 percent or 77, an improvement of 17. But if men’s wages had gone to 150 say and women’s percent stayed at 60, they would make 90 instead of 77. Moreover, if they had gone to 90 percent they would make 135 instead of 77, almost twice as much. Immigration did 2 things to women. It kept men’s wages down, and thus since women get a percentage less than 100 of men’s that means it kept theirs down. Second, the percentage of women’s pay to men’s pay was kept down by immigration. So women lost out twice from immigration, a lower percentage of men’s pay than they would have got, and their base in effect, men’s pay, didn’t move up. Even at 100 percent, women would only make what men did in 1973, since men only make that much.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=341

==

Women are often treated harshly by employers. Look at Mary Jo Kopechne who was left by Kennedy to die in an air pocket while he went back to his hotel and had a drink while she suffocated. See ytedk.com. Women are treated too harshly by employers for them to have a ceiling of men’s pay which doesn’t move since 1973. Women work too hard and are treated too harshly for their percentage of men’s pay to be kept at 77 percent by immigration instead of being close to 100 percent where it would have been after 40 years of women’s lib without the legal and illegal immigration influx. Women got the short end from Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration act 2 ways, men’s pay was frozen at the 1973 level and women’s percentage didn’t go to 100 percent, which it would have done without a market influx of low cost labor. Because health insurance benefits are cut back, women lose out a third time from immigration which has not just cut pay but also benefits including health insurance. Even if you get health insurance its not as good as it used to be.

==
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040801260&start=341

Women also lose in that 51 percent live without a spouse and on pay that is 77 percent of what a man made in 1973. That’s a pretty hard life. If they are a single mom on 77 percent of what a man made in 1973 that is harsher still.

Immigration is leaving many women unmarried, perhaps childless, or perhaps single moms. With men earning what they did in 1973, they aren’t able to pay much child support, and many just skip out because they earn so little.

Mary Jo Kopechne was a secretary when she was left to die in an air pocket by Kennedy at Chappaquiddick. The scenario experienced by women , pay at under 77 percent of men’s and men’s pay frozen at the 1973 level, and a 51 percent chance to live without a spouse would have been her life had Kennedy let her live, albeit under his 1965 Immigration Act. This is what Kennedy calls upside.

==Mary Jo Kopechne Scenario

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Jo_Kopechne

Mary Jo Kopechne (July 26, 1940July 18, 1969) was an American teacher, secretary and administrator, notable for her death in a car accident on Chappaquiddick Island in a car driven by Senator Ted Kennedy.”

Ytedk archive site

also

July 20, 2004, 9:44 a.m.
Remembering Mary Jo
35 years later: Ted Kennedy’s under-investigated scandal.
Myrna Blyth National Review Online
If she had worked to 2007, she would have retired at age 67. That would have been as a teacher, secretary and administrator. She would have made typically less than 77 percent of what a man made her entire career. Because men’s wages topped out in 1973, she would have made no more than 77 percent of what a man made in 1973. That is what would have happened to her under Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act, if she hadn’t suffered under Kennedy’s 1969 Chappaquiddick Act.

http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p60-231.pdf

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007040900105&start=41

Immigration kept men’s median wages to the 1973 level, and women’s wages to under 77 percent of men. That was legal immigration from Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act. With zero immigration, women’s wages would have reached parity with men long ago. In addition, men’s median wages would be higher than in 1973.

Search p60-231.pdf and go to census.gov to see a graph on page 18 that shows men’s median wages are less than in 1973 and that women’s ratio to men’s wages went from 60 percent in 1960 to 77 percent in 2005. They were kept from going higher by immigration which has targeted women’s jobs, e.g. cleaning and nursing.

==

amonster | Apr 9, 2007 8:26:05 PM great find.

quote

Labor Day is almost upon us, and like some of my fellow graybeards, I can, if I concentrate, actually remember what it was that this holiday once celebrated. Something about America being the land of broadly shared prosperity. Something about America being the first nation in human history that had a middle-class majority, where parents had every reason to think their children would fare even better than they had.
The young may be understandably incredulous, but the Great Compression, as economists call it, was the single most important social fact in our country in the decades after World War II. From 1947 through 1973, American productivity rose by a whopping 104 percent, and median family income rose by the very same 104 percent. More Americans bought homes and new cars and sent their kids to college than ever before. In ways more difficult to quantify, the mass prosperity fostered a generosity of spirit: The civil rights revolution and the Marshall Plan both emanated from an America in which most people were imbued with a sense of economic security.

That America is as dead as the dodo. Ours is the age of the Great Upward Redistribution.
end quote.

from Devaluing Labor By Harold Meyerson
Wednesday, August 30, 2006; Page A19
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082901042.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

Since 1973, men’s median wages are unchanged, see p60-231.pdf page 18 graph. Women’s wages were 60 percent of men’s in 1960 and are 77 percent in 2005.So women’s wages are less than 77 percent of what men’s wages were in 1973. This shows that before immigration, from 1947 to 1973, productivity and median wages went up 1 for 1. Since then, its all been to the shareholders, many of them rich senators like McCain and Kennedy.

==
Further comment on Meyerson quote that amonster | Apr 9, 2007 8:26:05 PM found above. quote

More Americans bought homes and new cars and sent their kids to college than ever before. In ways more difficult to quantify, the mass prosperity fostered a generosity of spirit: The civil rights revolution and the Marshall Plan both emanated from an America in which most people were imbued with a sense of economic security. end quote

Those words are so true. America was once so much more of a family than it is today. Today it is a Bush Hobbesian land. America was so much better 25 years ago. It was so much safer to walk at night. There was so much less fear.

Children could play on their own and roam and get into trouble. They were safe. Probably, no one on earth will ever know a land that great and good for centuries and possibly millenia to come.

You can see what America was in the movies from decades ago. That was once real and it was America. It was so safe and so more unified.

read more | digg story

%d bloggers like this: