Archive for the 'USDOJ' Category

Navigating Resources on Russia Plagiarism Files

January 31, 2014

This post is meant to help in finding information on Russia Plagiarism Files, ie the hypothesis that the Russian government keeps track of plagiarism, or its appearance or post publication efforts to claim credit or deny credit or recognition to rivals or victims.

If you come to a tag page like Klaus Fuchs you will find a stack of articles with the tag Klaus Fuchs with the latest articles first.  You can think of it as a column of articles with the latest article on the top of the column.

The latest article may be tagged Klaus Fuchs because it has some application related to Klaus Fuchs.  However, the latest article is not the one to read if you are starting at the beginning.  It will simply confuse you and seem hopeless.

One thing you can do is go to the bottom of the column which is the oldest article.

The top article currently in the Klaus Fuchs tag column is

This article is mostly about Thomas C. Reed citing the tag column Klaus Fuchs.  It is December 12, 2008.

Note the current link to the Reed article is now

If we go to the bottom of the Klaus Fuchs tag column, we get

This article is from 2006.  The 2006 article is more basic and from the beginning. So you would do better to read that unless you can’t think for yourself, in which case you just want to see that Thomas C. Reed linked to these webpages.  Reed was a former Sec of the Air Force and worked with Teller before that to develop nuclear weapons at Lawrence Livermore.

Another place to start on Russia Plagiarism Files is

This has links to some other articles.

If you come to a random article webpage from a Google link or a link in an email provided by a friend or unfriend, then you may find it confusing or not of much use.  You have to make some effort to find the right articles to read given your background knowledge.

This navigation page will be added to from time to time.  So you may want to come back to it.


As a reminder, See Something Say Something.

If you know something that could be of use in exposing government or academic corruption or in counter-terrorism, speak up.  Chechens or others may have specific resentments against academic, banking, government or international targets.  If you work for one of those or are a student and see something suspicious, speak up.  Report it to someone.  Post a comment on these webpages if you can’t do anything else.

This is currently posted on January 31, 2014.  We are in a fever over Sochi Terrorism.  But the strike may be somewhere else such as Harvard and MIT economics departments or business schools.  If you work or study there, and no one seems to take notice of anything, speak up.  These departments should issue warnings in advance of the Sochi games, really even before this.  They are a special target during Sochi. So are the IMF and World Bank in Washington DC or affiliated locations in Europe.

Russia may also be spreading stories inside Chechen or Muslim groups blaming Andrei Shleifer, Larry Summers, Stanley Fischer or others.  Putin wants to deflect blame for the Chechen genocide and Moscow Apartment Bombings onto the US, British and likely Israel.

After the Boston Bombings in 2013, Putin blamed the CIA for manipulating Anatoly Chubais, this fingered Harvard prof Andrei Shleifer.  If something happens in the US or Europe, Putin will blame the CIA.  If someone is killed, Putin will say they were the next Snowden and were going to expose the CIA.    Russia will have a twisted story to explain whatever happens.  Thus you can’t exclude any target or any scenario because it is too absurd or stupid.

Stanley Fischer’s appointment as Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve before the Sochi Olympics was waiving a red flag in the face of Chechens and Muslims. They blame the IMF loans under Fischer and Summers for funding the Chechen genocide in 1999 during the Second Chechen War.  The Kavkaz Center in Sweden pushes this line.  Thus the Federal Reserve is a target and groups or individuals linked to it.  If you know something about any of this, you should pass that on.  This includes Russia’s use of academic misconduct kompromat, pre or post publication.

The universities, the IMF and World Bank, Federal Reserve, banks and other related financial institutions have not passed on what they know to the FBI or JTTF or even within their own organization to their own security people.  They have to take blame for not doing so.  If you have information or academic misconduct, Russia’s use of it, an interest in this subject by Chechens and Muslims, Chinese, or Russians, then pass it on.

Countries like Pakistan and India and likely Iran try to piggy back on this information and use it. So report people from these countries if you know they are involved in such matters.  You can link to this page in a written report or tip as providing background on these subjects.

Don’t be a victim.  These people manipulate not just terrorism but academic misconduct and recognition to advance their national or group interests.  You don’t have to protect them because they are colleagues or leader figures, even if they have important titles or recognition.


Robert Reich: Tells Wall Street their common enemy is the Tea Party

October 30, 2010

Hunter Wallace reviews some of Robert Reich’s articles and statements to Congress.

Reich said don’t give the stimulus to just “White construction workers”. This was all code words that became a little too explicit. Charlie Rangel was there, possibly as chairman. This was testifying for the initial Obama stimulus.

Hunter Wallace reviews Reich’s statements and shows that Reich hates the Tea Party and wants to destroy the people. This is in effect for being White.

Hunter Wallace has written a very good article and exposed Robert Reich as someone motivated by hate of Whites and working to destroy Whites with trade and with forcing stimulus to go to non-Whites. Reich also says keep the state legislatures out of it, so as to keep them from giving the money to Whites presumably.

Reich hates the state legislatures from the days of the pre Civil Rights era. Reich’s conclusion is those state legislatures should never have a say in anything even budget matters or how to spend money on local projects. Presumably he thinks they would spend the money on Whites or at least not channel the money to non-Whites only, which is Reich’s real goal.

Reich shows himself full of hate for Whites. Robert Reich is a real enemy of Whites. The Democrats in Congress listened to him on stimulus and trade as has Obama. Obama is pushing free trade for Korea to export at low cost to the US and thus damage the US auto industry, what is left of computers, etc.

Here is Reich in WSJ saying that he Reich and Wall Street have a common enemy, the Tea Party

Why Business Should Fear the Tea Party
CEOs who complain about uncertainties caused by President Obama’s policies aren’t going to be happy about a new crop of congressman seeking to abolish the Fed.

Notice when Whites fear its Nazi. But Wall Street should fear the Tea Party. When Wall Street fears Whites like Reich does that fear is not Nazi.

They blame the Fed for creating the Great Recession and believe that the economy would be better off without a single institution in Washington setting monetary policy.

I.e. without Jews setting monetary policy. Actually monetary policy is a code word for setting bailout policy. And that is not just policy its specifically whom will be bailed out and they need to control who does the deciding of whom gets the bailout money.

Another tea party target is the Internal Revenue Service. South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint, who has emerged as the Senate’s leading tea party incumbent, says that his “main goal in the Senate will not only be to cut taxes, but to get rid of the IRS.” Mr. DeMint’s goal is echoed by many tea party candidates, including Arkansas Rep. John Boozman, now running for Senate.

Why is it that business and the rich should fear this?

Wall Street may be furious with the Obama administration but at least Mr. Obama (and his predecessor) bailed it out. By contrast, tea party activists consider the Troubled Asset Relief Program a betrayal of America. In the Bloomberg poll, nearly 70% of tea partiers said that they’re less likely to support a candidate who voted for the bank rescue.

Reich says he is with the banksters against their common main enemy, the Tea Party ie Whites. To Reich, its the Nazi Tea Party.

Underlying all of this is a deep tea party suspicion that big government is in cahoots with big business and Wall Street, against the rest of America.

The bailout proves it. Reich proves it by this article, his testimony to Congress, and his being in the Clinton administration as Labor Secretary while being anti-labor and in favor of free trade and worker replacement by immigration and low wages. Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973. That is the Reich achievement by cheap foreign labor.

Reich has betrayed workers while having the job title of Secretary of Labor. That puts him up as a person to be blamed by the White working class for their unemployment, underemployment, and stagnant wages.

Reich is saying let’s finish off White workers before they wake up to how much Robert Reich himself personally has lied to them as Secretary of Labor and betrayed them as Secretary of Labor. Reich is a Yale law school graduate like Clinton.

Lesser known is that a higher proportion of tea party adherents believes that free trade agreements hurt the nation overall (61%) than does the general population (53%), according to a NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll last month. In a poll earlier this year by the Mellman Group, a majority of tea party supporters favored putting taxes on imports from countries with lower environmental standards than the United States.

So Reich is for exploiting labor in other countries by exposing them to toxic working conditions and those will also hit pollute their schools and their own children. Reich wants malformed children around the world. For what? To keep White construction workers from having jobs in industry while construction work drops out from the burst of the housing bubble. Reich is against level working conditions in foreign countries that export into the US at cheap prices, causing White workers to lose their jobs. Suddenly, Reich doesn’t care about non-White workers losing their jobs. Secretary of anti-Labor is what he is.

History has shown that people threatened by losses of jobs, wages, homes and savings are easy prey for demagogues who turn those fears into anger at major institutions, as well as individuals and minorities who become easy scapegoats—immigrants, foreign traders, certain religious groups. Were it not for their economic stresses, Americans wouldn’t be receptive to abolishing the Fed and the IRS, or believe that government and big business were conspiring against them, or turn isolationist.

So when the chips are down, Reich is for cheap imports, and keeping stimulus away from White construction workers or White state legislatures. Doesn’t that show their fear is right? But fear is always wrong when Whites fear and always right when those who see Whites as their main enemy do it.

“History has shown that people threatened by losses of jobs, wages, homes and savings”

“as well as individuals”

like the Secretary of anti-White Labor Robert Reich.

Reich tries to deal with that “unfounded” fear, by in fact taking their jobs, wages, homes and savings, if they are White. And he takes them if not White in order to hit the Whites too.

Business leaders should be standing up to this dangerous idiocy, while actively supporting policies to relieve the economic stresses that fuel it. Their silence in both regards is bad for business and threatens the stability of our economic and political system.

“dangerous idiocy” What would be the dangerous idiocy? It isn’t voting for Hitler, since he still is not on the ballot. So it must be what?

Were it not for their economic stresses, Americans wouldn’t be receptive to abolishing the Fed and the IRS, or believe that government and big business were conspiring against them, or turn isolationist.

So Reich proposes conspiring against them by cheap imports and directing stimulus money to non-Whites to show them their fears are wrong? Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973. Graph page 19:

Mr. Reich is a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, former U.S. secretary of labor, and author, most recently, of “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future” (Knopf, 2010).

The state of Jewish America is good. The state of White America is bad, which for Reich is good, because White America is the main enemy of Reich. Reich says fear keeps Jews alive. Reich says that Whites are waking up to what has been done to them for decades by Jews like Reich. For decades, Jews like Reich have worked to take schools, jobs, education, factories, know-how, freedom, and their majority away from Whites.

Reich is saying the way to fight these fears is what? To finish Whites off. To keep free trade flowing to take away the rest of manufacturing from Whites. To direct stimulus money so Whites don’t get it and White state legislatures can’t get their hands on it.

Reich is saying that fear and hate of Whites is what keeps Jews like himself alive. He is saying that Wall Street should join him in that fear and hate of Whites. Reich is saying give their money to the Democrats because the Democrats are a reliable force against Whites. But he is also saying when they give to the GOP make sure the GOP knows its being bought to be anti-White on trades, stimulus, bailouts, affirmative action, desegregation, non-White immigration, amnesty, gay marriage, and the entire program of dispossession of Whites.

Reich is saying that Whites will start listening to those who have pointed out the whole time in the last 50 years that this was being done to them and who was doing it to them. Reich is saying this makes Whites the main enemy of Whites too because it will be bad for Wall Street bailouts and normal theft through market manipulation trading programs like the one the Justice Department asked a court to keep secret for Goldman Sachs.

Goldman’s high frequency trading program is for market manipulation. They don’t want the public to know how it works, because then they can’t make money.

Goldman Sachs and others use “flash trading” to send out automated sell offers at higher and higher prices until one comes back with no buyer. The program then drops back to the highest acceptable price and sells at what the buyer set as his maximum limit. This allows Goldman to always obtain the best possible selling price, while the buyer loses the normal give and take of bargaining. In the case of large orders, such as those from pension funds or mutual funds, this can cost the buyers a small fortune.

All this leaves us to wonder: Did Goldman really tell the government its high-speed, high-volume, algorithmic-trading program can be used to manipulate markets in unfair ways, as Facciponti said? And shouldn’t Goldman’s bosses be worried this revelation may cause lots of people to start hypothesizing aloud about whether Goldman itself might misuse this program?

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and JOSEPH M. DEMAREST, JR., the Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced that SERGEY ALEYNIKOV was indicted today on charges related to his theft of proprietary computer code concerning a high-frequency trading platform from his former employer, Goldman Sachs. ALEYNIKOV was previously arrested and is expected to be arraigned in Manhattan federal court at a later date.

This case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds Unit. Assistant United States Attorneys JOSEPH FACCIPONTI and REBECCA ROHR are in charge of the prosecution.

So they are helping Goldman Sachs maintain its edge in market manipulation programs to take away money from individual traders up to insurance companies, investment funds, pensions, and even hedge funds that don’t use high frequency trading. So even sophisticated hedge funds are fleeced by Goldman’s high frequency trading if they don’t do high frequency trading defensively. That can also get in the way of other goals in trading and not be practical if the fund has to make large trades in one direction.

When large institutions have to trade in one direction in a thin market, these programs let Goldman Sachs make it far worse for that institution to get good prices. They are systematically manipulated so that it is more costly for large institutions to do large trades in one direction. This then hits individuals when these large institutions are insurance companies, pensions, mutual funds, or others.

The USDOJ under Preet Bharara is helping Goldman manipulate the markets against individuals, mutual funds, pension funds and insurance companies.

Robert Reich from WSJ

Underlying all of this is a deep tea party suspicion that big government is in cahoots with big business and Wall Street, against the rest of America.

Reich is saying Wall Street, government, and Reich share a common enemy, the White Tea Party. He is saying they have to eliminate it before they wake up to the truth that they are trying to eliminate it with non-White immigration, free trade, bailouts, monetary aka bailout policy, and even helping Goldman Sachs manipulate markets when caught doing so.

== Fear roundup:

The Right Way to Manage U.S. Attorneys

March 10, 2007

“The actions of an appointed U.S. attorney must be totally off-limits to questions from the White House or anyone in Congress.” from Abbe David Lowell Saturday, March 10, 2007; Page A19.

A discussion of whether Bush is trying to influence the Tom Delay, Jack Abramoff, and Libby investigations or to intimidate Assistant US Attorney Sara Bloom at the USAO Mass from reopening the Harvard investigation follows. This are in response to the article by Abbe Lowell on the US Attorney firings.


The following is all hypotheses and speculation. All statements should be restated as questions. All other
disclaimes apply.
Comments at WaPo


Assistant US Attorney Sara Bloom of USAO Mass is the real target of intimidation? Because Russia used kompromat to get loans from Clinton admin and Bush knew thay by the time of Bush v. Gore? In July 1998, Putin became head of FSB and Russia got another 4.8 billion in IMF loans.

But the money was taken from the bank accounts of the Russian govt to the personal accounts of the leaders. (Note the IMF disputes this in part and had an audit done and claimed equivalent amounts of money from other Russian government controlled accounts were used.) So the Russian government defaulted on Russian govt debt in Aug 98 since the money was not in the govt bank accounts.

Russia 4.8 billion IMF

Russia 4.8 billion IMF

A discussion of some of the IMF Russia and Asia transactions that is more technical is here.

Two professors, Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer had control over the IMF loans to Russia. Putin and the oligarchs and FSB had decades of files on academic kompromat some of it linked to Fischer’s 1969 Ph.D. thesis and an NSF grant involving Paul Samuelson, Summers’ uncle.

The KGB in 1972 at an econ conference in Warsaw may have used this incident and others to try to pressure Samuelson and Arrow, also uncle of Summers to nominate Kantorovich of the USSR for the Nobel in econ.

This was all possibly hid from USAO Mass from 1997 to 2005 by Clinton admin and then Bush. Did Bush use it during Bush v. Gore to make Gore go away? Gore turned down the presidency of Harvard. Did Marc Rich know this? Libby and Wolfowitz? Jacob Wolfowitz likely knew of the 1969 and 1972 incidents.

The above is speculation.⊂=AR

Job Offer to Stanley Fischer from Putin in 2001:

quote Russia Restores Ties with IMF BBC News June 19, 2001 For his part, Mr Putin complimented Mr Fischer, who plans to step down from his IMF role before the end of the year. He also offered him a job. We are always glad to see you in our country, said Mr Putin. If you would like to move from the IMF to Moscow, we can look at various options. end quote.

Putin likely got in on the July 1998 4.8 billion pot of money. So he was protecting his money at this point. After Fischer was hired by Israel in Jan 2005, Putin did an arms deal with Syria and then Iran. Israel and Bush kept quiet. The SVR and FSB are professionals at intimidation. Follow the money. Follow Putins money.
search “In Honor of Edmund S. Phelps ” plagiarism

quote Thus, my much-cited 1969 paper on optimal intertemporal portfolio programming opportunistically used the Bellman-Beckman-Phelps recursive techniques to analyze what defines the best qualitative asset-portfolio mix of the Phelps 1962 aggregate saving. It was not plagiarism but it was horning in on a created public good there for the taking. end quote Paul Samuelson.

old link:

from Preface Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics:
In Honor of Edmund S. Phelps
Edited by Philippe Aghion, Roman Frydman, Joseph Stiglitz, and Michael Woodford. Its on line.

Note the text was removed from above link after being posted with this link.

But it can be seen with Google inside:

If you type the word plagiarism into the search, you get part of the passage quoted above.  Click on page 1 and scroll down.  This link brings it up:

Fischer’s thesis was part of the same 1969 events. Samuelson and Merton got NSF grants for their 1969 papers. But it was already in part in the 1966 Nils Hakansson Ph.D. thesis that MIT had a copy of in 1966. Fischer got his US citizenship from his thesis. Above is speculation.
search Wolfowitz

Engle Nobel autobio shows Jacob Wolfowitz, Paul’s father was part of this small world in 1969.quote I took Kiefer’s probability and Wolfowitz’s statistics. I was extremely happy. … We married on August 10, 1969. On that day, I turned in my dissertation, received my Ph.D. and we left Cornell for good to take my first academic job at MIT. …
… Many of my students from that time have gone on to do quite well themselves: Larry Summers, …
Frank Fisher, Bob Solow, and Jerry Rothenberg encouraged me to join them on a new project to build a model of the city of Boston. …end quote.
quote Robert M. Solow – Autobiography
So, in 1949-50, I spent a fellowship year at Columbia University, in the lectures of Abraham Wald, Jacob Wolfowitz and T.W. Anderson, along with my fellow … end quote. Solow Nobel Prize autobio.

Solow was on one of the Ph.D. committees of Merton and Stanley Fischer at that time. This was one little world and Russia knew this to use it at the 1972 Warsaw econ conference to pressure Arrow and Samuelson to nominate Kantorovich of the USSR for the 1975 Nobel Prize in economics. Above is speculation.


Paul Wolfowitz was Jacob Wolfowitz’s son and signed the 1998 PNAC letter to make regime change in Iraq part of US goals. Clinton was impeached in fall of 1998 and signed the Iraq Liberation Act in October 1998. At the same time there were hearings into IMF loans for Russia, LTCM bailout, etc.

Robert C. Merton was part of LTCM which bought Russian bonds in Aug 98 betting the IMF would have to bail Russia out. But the money was put into the personal bank accounts of the leaders so it wasn’t there to pay Russia’s bonds, so it defaulted. LTCM went belly up and Congress investigated why the Fed helped arrange a bailout.

The USAO Mass had already started investigating Harvard and Russia and Clinton profs like Larry Summers in spring 1997. If Jacob Wolfowitz had revealed this at that time, Clinton might have been removed from office and this would have become part of the ongoing investigations of Clinton more closely. This could be used again during Bush v. Gore, the USAO Mass was still investigating, in fact to August 2005. The above is all speculation.


The DeLay-Abramoff Money Trail
Nonprofit Group Linked to Lawmaker Was Funded Mostly by Clients of Lobbyist

quote Two former Buckham associates said that he told them years ago not only that the $1 million donation was solicited from Russian oil and gas executives, but also that the initial plan was for the donation to be made via a delivery of cash to be picked up at a Washington area airport.

One of the former associates, a Frederick, Md., pastor named Christopher Geeslin who served as the U.S. Family Network’s director or president from 1998 to 2001, said Buckham further told him in 1999 that the payment was meant to influence DeLay’s vote in 1998 on legislation that helped make it possible for the IMF to bail out the faltering Russian economy and the wealthy investors there.

“Ed told me, ‘This is the way things work in Washington,’ ” Geeslin said. “He said the Russians wanted to give the money first in cash.” Buckham, he said, orchestrated all the group’s fundraising and spending and rarely informed the board about the details. Buckham and his attorney, Laura Miller, did not reply to repeated requests for comment on this article.

The IMF funding legislation was a contentious issue in 1998. The Russian stock market fell steeply in April and May, and the government in Moscow announced on June 18 — just a week before the $1 million check was sent by the London law firm — that it needed $10 billion to $15 billion in new international loans.

House Republican leaders had expressed opposition through that spring to giving the IMF the money it could use for new bailouts, decrying what they described as previous destabilizing loans to other countries. The IMF and its Western funders, meanwhile, were pressing Moscow, as a condition of any loan, to increase taxes on major domestic oil companies such as Gazprom, which had earlier defaulted on billions of dollars in tax payments.

On Aug. 18, 1998, the Russian government devalued the ruble and defaulted on its treasury bills. But DeLay, appearing on “Fox News Sunday” on Aug. 30 of that year, criticized the IMF financing bill, calling the replenishment of its funds “unfortunate” because the IMF was wrongly insisting on a Russian tax increase. “They are trying to force Russia to raise taxes at a time when they ought to be cutting taxes in order to get a loan from the IMF. That’s just outrageous,” DeLay said. end quote

By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 31, 2005; A01

search Russia IMF july 1998$file/kap08_01.htm

If Russia was bribing Tom Delay, they weren’t using academic kompromat at the same time? This was a big time operation of the Russian goverment to get these IMF loans. They were bribing Tom Delay through Jack Abramoff and at the same time there were pressuing Larry Summers at US Treasury and Stanley Fischer at IMF based on the academic kompromat trail that stretches back to the 1920’s and includes the same methods used to help gain atomic know-how.

Putin was head of FSB in July 1998. This was partly his operation. That is why he became President of Russia, he was part of this. That’s why Berezovsky and Yeltsin trusted him.

They were pushing all buttons at once and that didn’t just include bribing Tom Delay but also pushing academic kompromat buttons. That was while USAO Mass was investigating Harvard from 1997 and questioning Summers on his relationship to Shleifer.

Paul Wolfowitz and the neocons knew the Clinton profs and Harvard were concealing this history from the USAO Mass investigation. They got the Iraq Liberation Act during the Clinton impeachment. Then used this during Bush v. Gore to influence Scalia and then make Gore go away. Scalia has had econ Ph.D./JD clerks from the schools involved from the 1990’s to now. The links are all over the place. The above is speculation.


Bush is trying to intimidate the investigation of Tom Delay and Jack Abramoff, of Marc Rich, and of other investigations that may link to this. Bush is trying to keep Assistant US Attorney Sara Bloom from reopening the Harvard investigation into whether Bush’s team knew this in 1998 and formed a conspiracy to keep this information from USAO Mass and use it to pressure Clinton admin figures for the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act and then later during Bush v. Gore. Above is speculation.


Bush was not a US government employee prior to Jan 20, 2001. Nor were the others during these incidents. If they formed an agreement as non US government employees to keep this information from the USAO Mass office, that was a conspiracy to obstruct justice and to conceal espionage by Russia against the United States. That is what this is about. That is why they put into the Patriot Act that they could appoint interim US Attorneys. They had this problem from before 9-11. The above is speculation.

read more | digg story

The above is all hypotheses and speculation. All statements should be restated as questions. All other disclaimes apply.

Conspiracy Theory

December 6, 2006

Conspiracy Theory List

Litvinenko and others say that: Putin is behind the 1999 Moscow Apartment Building bombings

US Dept of State says that Russia is behind saying that CIA behind AIDs:

The U.S. military or intelligence community is a favorite villain in many conspiracy theories.

For example, the Soviet disinformation apparatus regularly blamed the U.S. military or intelligence community for a variety of natural disasters as well as political events. In March 1992, then-Russian foreign intelligence chief Yevgeni Primakov admitted that the disinformation service of the Soviet KGB intelligence service had concocted the false story that the AIDS virus had been created in a US military laboratory as a biological weapon. When AIDS was first discovered, no one knew how this horrifying new disease had arisen, although scientists have now used DNA analysis to determine that “all HIV-1 strains known to infect man” are closely related to a simian immunodeficiency virus found in a western equatorial African chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes. But the Soviets used widespread suspicions about the U.S. military to blame it for AIDS. (More details on this.)”

So if CIA did it, its conspiracy theory, if KGB or FSB or SVR did it, its not conspiracy theory.

USDOJ is the world’s largest conspiracy theory site?

USDOJ has over 15,000 hits on the search conspiracy

Conspiracy Nut: A person who believes everyone charged by USDOJ for conspiracy is guilty, that they should have been charged with that crime, and that what they were charged with should be a crime.

Well known conspiracy nuts: Alberto Gonzales, John Ashcroft, John Yoo.




Supreme Court and Judiciary

conspiracy site: over 19,000 and growing. Since DOJ is the source of most of these conspiracy hits, we still go back to DOJ.

Washington Post has over 10,000 hits on the search: conspiracy

Harvard conspiracy has 19,600
— Conspiracy events in History

Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

Boston Tea Party

Assassination of Caeser

Hitler Stalin Pact to Divide Poland that started World War II

==WWI Explanations are all conspiracy theory?

“Events which seem to resist such interpretation—for example, because they are, in fact, unexplainable—may provoke the inquirer to look harder for a meaning, until one is reached that is capable of offering the inquirer the required emotional satisfaction. As sociological historian Holger Herwig found in studying German explanations for the origins of World War I:
Those events that are most important are hardest to understand, because they attract the greatest attention from mythmakers and charlatans. ”

So the conclusion is that WWI is unexplainable and everyone who tries to do so is a conspiracy nut, mythmaker and charlatan. Presumably, this applies to all large historical events.

A guy in Serbia shot some Austrian Archduke, so Austria sent an ultimatum to Serbia designed to be refused, and Serbia wouldn’t agree to a little of it, so Austria declared war backed by Germany, because they wanted to control central Europe is a conspiracy theory. Just like Russia wanted to stop it, the French sided with the Russians, and the Brits joined in to stop the Germans when they invaded Belgrium. The Turks joined in out of their long standing imperialist ambitions, plus they were already killing Christians in genocide, and why not get some land out of it as well? All that is conspiracy theory, myth making and charlatanism.

== Conspiracy Theory and Theory of History

So Conspiracy Theory is the view that history
is determined by individual and sometimes identifiable actions. Standard Theory is that history is not explainable and that all attempts to explain or even describe history are mythmaking and charlatanism. It sounds like Standard Theory is close to Marxist Leninist Theory, except the conspiracy theory parts, of course.

Sounds like we are all conspiracy nuts.


Bush admits to overseas CIA jails

CIA flights renditions

Secret Prisons Timeline

CIA wiki


cia program detentions

== Unitary Conspiray Theory by John Yoo

Nat Hentoff on Yoo etc.

Unitary Executive Theory is conspiracy theory.

John Yoo, the Berkeley, Bush DOJ, Silberman Thomas Clerk, Hatch Senate Judiciary Chief Counsel, Torture Memos, CIA Renditions, Unitary Executive Theory, Walking Conspiracy Theory.

=Carlyle Group: Follow the Money

(Remember Lee Hamilton’s 9-11 Commission said don’t follow the money. This was after the House Senate Joint Taskforce already had in 2003 and found it led to Saudi Arabia. Lee Hamilton’s whole career seems a conspiracy theory. Does he wish he had gone to Yale and into the CIA?)

search Carlyle Group

Richest 2 pct own more than half the world: study

Tue Dec 5, 2006 8:12 AM EST


–Law firms

Baker Botts


–Conspiracy Commissions

Hamilton Iran Contra

Hamilton October Surprise (theory Bush Sr. did a deal in 1980 to hold hostages until after election)

Baker Hamilton Iraq Study Group

Baker Kean Commission

— Immigration Conspiracy Theory

Immigration Chappaquiddick-ization implies the Middle Class in US and the GOP are doomed. We will all be toys for Bush McCain Kennedy Yoo. Its the extraordinary rendition of America against the will of its people.

This article represents hypotheses, speculation, opinion or conspiracy theory. All other disclaimers apply.

%d bloggers like this: